You think that major chord progressions (like I-IV-V-I) are classical melodies? Most pop music is severely lacking in musical technique. Classical music was (and is) real music; far more creative and complex than whatever you'll get from the **AA. Jazz is like that, but in its own completely new way (i.e. improv, interpretation, style).
Checks and balances, son. There's always the Judicial branch to look at for this sort of thing. If this sort of bullshit got through Congress, I'm sure hell would be let loose in the Judicial side of things. "Joe Sixpack" can't view his home movies anymore because he hasn't paid the **AA tax? Watch out for flying chairs...
Oh come on, why doesn't it support Illinois? Chicago is one of the biggest cities in the world, yet we get excluded... They forgot New York even! Bah...
I don't know what he'll do, but I'm sure that you can be one of the owners of said IP for about $27 or so. Sure, it's a far smaller share of the company (i.e. a single share), but you'd still be the owner of a miniscule piece of Disney and its copyrighted works.
I'd recommend something like rTorrent or even the original BitTorrent for both robustness and low resource usage. CLI torrent programs will always be far less resource-intensive than a full-blown GUI like the non-free Windows ones or other popular programs like Azureus.
I would much rather spend $100 on a gig or two of RAM than ~$140 on a Microsoft Windows license just to use non-free software like BitComet or muTorrent. At least I can resell the RAM to a friend when I upgraded my memory again in a year or two (if needed).
I think he meant Free as I never see no-cost music published without some sort of gimmick. It takes money to buy equipment to do all the recording and whatnot, so it's sorta hard to publish music as gratis unless you are doing live gigs in the first place (which you should be doing if you're a musician; it's the best way of living as a musician).
When is the last time you saw a short Mickey Mouse cartoon?
Never if Disney continues to corrupt the copyright laws. I'd rather consider anything published before 1986 to be public domain, but I'm not going to do anything large enough to warrant legal issues.
It's doing no evil if by answering their questions you're possibly incriminating yourself. I prefer to use my Fifth Amendment rights to do otherwise. Those nutjobs can find anything wrong with you if they don't like you, so it's best to stay quiet.
Shut up! You're ruining our perfect chance to roll out a "fibre to every home" political campaign so that us Americans don't have to suffer with Ma Bell's crappy DSL services.:(
I remember the reasoning behind people trusting him was that he would give an outright bullshit reason for any problem they had, so they would do whatever possible to fix it.
He means Gecko 1.8. Firefox 1.5 (and 2.0 eventually) use Gecko 1.8. The current Firefox trunk is Gecko 1.9a1 (Firefox 3.0, that of which will be based on their ongoing efforts to make a platform called XULRunner by then). The different 1.7 versions would probably be Firefox 1.0 and Mozilla Suite.
Konqueror does indeed kick massive amounts of ass, but I still prefer Firefox. There is an ongoing effort to include usage of Qt, so we'll eventually get good Mozilla products that work well with KDE. In the meantime, I just stick with gtk-qt-engine.
So, does that mean if you include a method that basically self-checkout's itself from your modified version and allows for download (excluding personal data files I'd assume), you must respect that feature? I don't get how this is supposed to be done; if there's no way to do it, there's no way to enforce it either.
You think that major chord progressions (like I-IV-V-I) are classical melodies? Most pop music is severely lacking in musical technique. Classical music was (and is) real music; far more creative and complex than whatever you'll get from the **AA. Jazz is like that, but in its own completely new way (i.e. improv, interpretation, style).
Checks and balances, son. There's always the Judicial branch to look at for this sort of thing. If this sort of bullshit got through Congress, I'm sure hell would be let loose in the Judicial side of things. "Joe Sixpack" can't view his home movies anymore because he hasn't paid the **AA tax? Watch out for flying chairs...
Oh come on, why doesn't it support Illinois? Chicago is one of the biggest cities in the world, yet we get excluded... They forgot New York even! Bah...
I don't know what he'll do, but I'm sure that you can be one of the owners of said IP for about $27 or so. Sure, it's a far smaller share of the company (i.e. a single share), but you'd still be the owner of a miniscule piece of Disney and its copyrighted works.
Why would anyone want to install java anyways?
Why would anyone want to install Microsoft Windows anyways? I'm serious here...
I hear that this is a good place to check as well as here.
I'd recommend something like rTorrent or even the original BitTorrent for both robustness and low resource usage. CLI torrent programs will always be far less resource-intensive than a full-blown GUI like the non-free Windows ones or other popular programs like Azureus.
I would much rather spend $100 on a gig or two of RAM than ~$140 on a Microsoft Windows license just to use non-free software like BitComet or muTorrent. At least I can resell the RAM to a friend when I upgraded my memory again in a year or two (if needed).
I think he meant Free as I never see no-cost music published without some sort of gimmick. It takes money to buy equipment to do all the recording and whatnot, so it's sorta hard to publish music as gratis unless you are doing live gigs in the first place (which you should be doing if you're a musician; it's the best way of living as a musician).
He said Firefox and Safari, so that would cover Konqueror, Epiphany, Galeon, Mozilla, Firefox, and probably others I'm not remembering.
Register an account and you wouldn't have to worry about them. ;)
Third time's a charm...
Unless you're throwing all that data into a block, you'll have to use XHTML the same way the Atom specification says.
When is the last time you saw a short Mickey Mouse cartoon?
Never if Disney continues to corrupt the copyright laws. I'd rather consider anything published before 1986 to be public domain, but I'm not going to do anything large enough to warrant legal issues.
It's doing no evil if by answering their questions you're possibly incriminating yourself. I prefer to use my Fifth Amendment rights to do otherwise. Those nutjobs can find anything wrong with you if they don't like you, so it's best to stay quiet.
Then explain how Trolltech makes money off of selling proprietary licenses for GPL software? Legitly might I add.
Shut up! You're ruining our perfect chance to roll out a "fibre to every home" political campaign so that us Americans don't have to suffer with Ma Bell's crappy DSL services. :(
Show me how to stream ice and I'll show you a group of pissed off physicists who say otherwise.
I remember the reasoning behind people trusting him was that he would give an outright bullshit reason for any problem they had, so they would do whatever possible to fix it.
Sounds more like an audiophile to me. ;)
Multimedia geeks are the ones who make things like Xiph.org, Xine, MPlayer, VLC, MPEG, etc.
I think you mean nerds...
Second only to Windows itself I'd presume?
He means Gecko 1.8. Firefox 1.5 (and 2.0 eventually) use Gecko 1.8. The current Firefox trunk is Gecko 1.9a1 (Firefox 3.0, that of which will be based on their ongoing efforts to make a platform called XULRunner by then). The different 1.7 versions would probably be Firefox 1.0 and Mozilla Suite.
Konqueror does indeed kick massive amounts of ass, but I still prefer Firefox. There is an ongoing effort to include usage of Qt, so we'll eventually get good Mozilla products that work well with KDE. In the meantime, I just stick with gtk-qt-engine.
So, does that mean if you include a method that basically self-checkout's itself from your modified version and allows for download (excluding personal data files I'd assume), you must respect that feature? I don't get how this is supposed to be done; if there's no way to do it, there's no way to enforce it either.