Slashdot Mirror


ZDNet on the Essence of Geek

sebFlyte writes "ZDNet has a feature on The Essence of Geek, which looks at the rise of the geek (and the fact that everyone's turning into one), in the years post .com boom." From the article: "For a few years, an interest in computers and technology became inextricable linked with wealth and power -- geek became chic. Technology companies suddenly became the focus of the kind of attention that had been reserved for the music or fashion industries. In the UK TV makers even went so far as to create a hip series, Attachments, based around the antics of a tech start-up."

239 comments

  1. It takes more than that by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    and the fact that everyone's turning into [a geek]...

    Um...no. Owning an iPod and knowing how to use it doesn't make you a geek. Knowing how to use your Windows smartphone doesn't make you a geek. Discussing mobile phone design doesn't make you a geek, because from tfa, I don't think they were talking about protocols or other engineering aspects. Even knowing how to synchronize your email with your smartphone doesn't make you a geek. It makes you a slave, but not a geek.

    Knowing how to use technical things in the prescribed manner does not make you a geek, any more than knowing the exits on an airplane makes you a flight attendent. Knowing how to use technical things in ways they were never meant to be used makes you a geek. (and this is only one small definition "geekiness.")

    Saying that "we're all geeks" is like saying "everyone is special, just like you."

    Mox

    1. Re:It takes more than that by xeniten · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      There's an old saying I picked up years ago that fits here...

      "Nerds are people that are fascinated by technology. Geeks are people that are fascinated by technology, but know what to do with it."

      Case in point, Bill Gates is a nerd. Linus Torvalds is a geek. IMHO.

      --
      Romana: "How did you know?" Doctor Who: "Ah, well, knowing is easy. Everyone does THAT ad nauseum. I just sort of hope"
    2. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing how to use technical things in the prescribed manner does not make you a geek, any more than knowing the exits on an airplane makes you a flight attendent.

      To quote from The New Hacker's Dictionary, a computer geek is "one who eats (computer) bugs for a living. One who fulfills all the dreariest negative stereotypes about hackers: an asocial, malodorous, pasty-faced monomaniac with all the personality of a cheese grater. Cannot be used by outsiders without implied insult to all hackers. A computer geek may be either a fundamentally clueless individual or a proto-hacker in larval stage. Also called 'turbo nerd' or 'turbo geek.' "

    3. Re:It takes more than that by grub · · Score: 1

      Your comment and mine below start eerily similar... do you have a camera installed in my office? [/tinfoil_hat]

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:It takes more than that by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      "I just want you to know, that you are very, very special. Just like everyone else."

      I think that's pretty much on the mark. I do think that, in general, knowing how to use something doesn't put you into a different mold... a more apt example would be: knowing how to drive doesn't make you a mechanic.

      In any case, I would say an infatuation with technology or an obscure subject is what makes a geek. Technology (ie: computers) is becoming more common place.. so being a "Computer Geek" is becoming less common as a result, not more. Geekiness imho is partially related to the obscurity of the interest.. maybe that is just my own take though.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    5. Re:It takes more than that by flipsoft · · Score: 1

      Wheewww...

      I hope that not everyone is classified as a "geek". If we were all considered "geeks" then our chances of getting laid would have dropped drastically.

      Who could compete with any of these new "geeks" that look like Brad Pitt?

      Our current status of being a "geek" scores points with some of the ladies!

      -flipsoft

    6. Re:It takes more than that by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Knowing how to use technical things in ways they were never meant to be used makes you a geek. (and this is only one small definition "geekiness.")

      I agree with you on all the other points, but wasn't this the definition of a "hack" last time we had this pointless discussion?

      To me "geek", at least in the sense related to technology, is one who not only uses technology, but also understands how it works and is capable of applying technical knowledge. One who loves programming computers is probably not using anything "in ways they were never meant to be used", but most certainly a "geek" by most people's definition of the word. Probably a "hacker" by a lot of people's definition, too, although the programming itself wouldn't likely be considered a "hack" unless it were something quick-n-dirty or a particularly elegant application of some algorithm that were previously used for something entirely different.

      There. I think that clears it up. *HEAD EXPLODES*

    7. Re:It takes more than that by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Nerds are people that are fascinated by technology. Geeks are people that are fascinated by technology, but know what to do with it."

      Case in point, Bill Gates is a nerd. Linus Torvalds is a geek. IMHO.


      Do me a favour! You are suggesting that Bill Gates, the guy who built a technology company that changed the entire planet and based on the success attained a personal fortune that is larger than the GDP of many countries is someone who is "fascinated by technology but doesnt know what to do with it!". I think not!

      It is time to stop trying to define the terms nerd, geek, dork etc they mean nothing. I happen to be a software professional whose hobbies are mostly related to tech too. I have been called all of these things (and more :oP), as a wise-mane once said... "I am what I am and that's all that I am!".

    8. Re:It takes more than that by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see Bill as a business man.
      He used computers as an end to a means, MONEY.

      Linus is here for the code.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    9. Re:It takes more than that by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 0

      "Do me a favour! You are suggesting that Bill Gates, the guy who built a technology company that changed the entire planet and based on the success attained a personal fortune that is larger than the GDP of many countries is someone who is "fascinated by technology but doesnt know what to do with it!". I think not!"

      I think yes. What he did/does is marketing, nothing to do with technology.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    10. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it actually takes less then all that. The simple act of biting the head off a chicken makes you a geek. That's how i do it anyway.

    11. Re:It takes more than that by xeniten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Do me a favour! You are suggesting that Bill Gates, the guy who built a technology company that changed the entire planet and based on the success attained a personal fortune that is larger than the GDP of many countries is someone who is "fascinated by technology but doesnt know what to do with it!"." Yes I am. Exactly that. Look it's well known that Microsoft makes terrible products. Microsoft is the McDonalds of the software industry. Sure McDonalds probably sells more food than anyone, and they are very wealthy at it. But everyone knows a steady diet of that crap will kill you eventually. Microsoft's major customers are nerds not geeks and that's why MS is so wealthy, that's why they have been so successful. Their target market is decidedly non-geek. Most geeks use Linux, *BSD, and recently OSX. If Bill Gates was a geek, Windows would be far more secure and more stable than it is. If Bill Gates were a geek I doubt anyone would have ever heard of the "blue screen of death".

      --
      Romana: "How did you know?" Doctor Who: "Ah, well, knowing is easy. Everyone does THAT ad nauseum. I just sort of hope"
    12. Re:It takes more than that by nickos · · Score: 1

      "What, exactly, is the difference between a nerd and a geek?"

      I replied, "It's tougher than it seems. It's subtle. Instinctual. I think geek implies hireability, whereas nerd doesn't necessarily mean your skills are 100 percent sellable."

      -Douglas Coupland, "Microserfs"

    13. Re:It takes more than that by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Nerds and geeks alike are people fascinated by technology.

      Geeks have social skills, or the appearance of social skills (their social ineptitude can simply be so awesome that it gives the appearance of coolness.)

      Nerds have no style, typically because they cannot be arsed to care.

      The use of the term "Geek" to mean "social computer user" essentially began at MIT and/or UC Santa Cruz. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do. Now quit doing that to yourself and get back to work!
      - Your Boss

    15. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The goal of fashon is to make others feel insecure about themselves so they come to the logical conclusion they need to go out and buy whatever it is you tell them to, no matter how rediculous it is; it could be a bucket hat, hello kitty underwear, or a gaming shirt. Insecure people are people who haven't accepted themselves the way they are, and therefor, need to draw their self-acceptance from something else. The result of the goal of fashon is people eventually build an idea of what they are from what has gotten them accepted and, upon accepting this as self-image, go out and buy things they like; what kind of clothing defines me? It used to be parents taught the kids to accept themselves and what good/bad clothing was, for example. Now, due to a century of abandonment to schools, churches, and steets, kids grow up without any self-value whatseover and get sucked into this massive fashon industry. What ever it sells, they become; you are the product, you are the reciept.

      What I find ironic is people such as yourself who've decided to define themselves as geeks simply to be accepted by the illusion of a horde of ignorant sheeple. You do realize the word geek once meant people who are pretty retarded socially, correct? Therein lies the irony; people want to be told they are smart, obstensivly because their parents abandoned them and anyone who's either been socially beaten around(teased, taunted, ect) or has had decent parents knows compliments are often used to control and to accept them on their own terms. Instead of building themselves up to be truely smart, they try to be some person who can take apart and put together a computer and reconfigure it with a soldering iron, but cannot figure out their armpit rash is due to their lack of hygene.

      The reason the advertisers catered to geeks and made the image of other people wanting to be like them? The dot-com boom necessitated the buying of a lot of high-tech gadgetry to keep itself going; they wanted a customer base. So everyone got lumped under one term and bam; instant sales.

      Stop watching things that make you want; TV is one example, the better part of movies are another, advertisements are yet another. You will be far more happy if you are in control of your wants than if you are not, especially when you can decide when they are fulfilled.

    16. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Bill Gates, the guy who built a technology company that changed the entire planet..."

      You give him too much credit, IMHO. The changes he has made to the world are mostly negative from my perspective. His company's products are a constant source of incompatibility becaue of their control-freak nature.

      That I don't respect and much of his success is also attributed to the people he employed and a bit of luck.

    17. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrible products? Like the spaghetti-code monolithic kernel they made for NT. Wait, that's Linux. Oh, well maybe it's the slow, buggy and prone-to-crash GUI. Wait, that's X windows. Okay, perhaps it's the slow, bloated and ugly office suite that's missing functionality of other more advanced office suites. No wait, that's OpenOffice.org.

      Like I tell all other Linux zealots who hate on Microsoft, it's not 1995 anymore. Windows doesn't suck. It "just works" and it's fast and it has a large selection of free and proprietary software available for it.

      This post was written in Firefox running in KDE on top of Gentoo Linux.

    18. Re:It takes more than that by Otter · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Microsoft's major customers are nerds not geeks and that's why MS is so wealthy, that's why they have been so successful.

      Actually, Microsoft's major customers are pretty much everyone who uses a computer which a) is why MS is so wealthy and b) tends to support the grandparent's point that Bill Gates might be thought to know at least a little about "what to do with technology".

    19. Re:It takes more than that by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Saying that "we're all geeks" is like saying "everyone is special, just like you." Actually it's saying that formerly non-geek people are becoming more technologically saavy. Short of asserting your dominance as a nerd, there was no real point in correcting that statement. (or modding it up, for that matter.)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    20. Re:It takes more than that by westlake · · Score: 1
      Microsoft's major customers are nerds not geeks and that's why MS is so wealthy, that's why they have been so successful.

      The nerd is fad-driven, the geek a hobbyist, neither are a solid foundation on which to build a business.

      Apple sells an upscale urban life-style, and is subject to the boom and bust cycles of that particular market niche. Microsoft, marketing middle-class value, tends to do well in good times and bad.

    21. Re:It takes more than that by kurt_ram · · Score: 1, Informative

      Mac Donalds and Microsoft. Oh God. Such a terrible analogy and modded +4 informative. Also, you are wrong about eating at Mac Donalds. Know the facts.

      --
      Clearly, Google is the next Microsoft.
    22. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Most geeks use Linux"

      Strangely enough, the most popular and widely-used linux programs rip-off concepts from Microsoft programs right down to the GUI. Instead of creating something new and innovative, the open source crowd has resorted to making their apps look and feel more and more like Microsoft products with each revision.

      I'm no fan of Microsoft's "embrace, extend, extinguish" philosophy. But the open source crowd's philosophy of "copy, don't innovate" is what drove me back to BSD.

    23. Re:It takes more than that by CBMTTek · · Score: 1

      Being a geek is denying that you are a geek, and having a printed list of reasons that you are not a geek.

    24. Re:It takes more than that by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      THe assetion that everyone wants to get into IT just beacuse they associate it with money is true IME.

      I am at the start of my career, working in a call center for an ISP (not making very good money), before that I have had many temp IT jobs. I have met so many people that are only interested in IT because they think it will make them rich, most of these people are really stupid/naive. I working with people that think that in ten years time they will be earning 75 grand a year (english pounds, ~ 130,000 dollars) just because they have seen jobs advertised on the web with that salary. I have yet to actually have it out with any of these people tho I did mention that in the uk only 10% of the population earn more than 30 grand a year. Basically if you can look around the 10 closest people to you in the office and say that you are the cleverest and most qualified (and know the right people) person there then you may have chance of earning megabucks. Most of the people I work with are still chasing dot com silly money and have very little interest in technology or computing (I don't know anyone at work who reads /., not that that is an indication of competance). I met a 40 year old guy who reckons that if he learns SQL in his spare time someone will hire him on 20k even tho he has no experience, he was driving instructor up until a couple of years ago.

      What annoys me most is that I literally can't do anything else and wouldn't want to, I will be working in IT all my life (hopefully) no matter what the pay because I enjoy working with computers and like the technical stuff.

      There is a little bit of jealously to this (get off my turf!) but it really would be nice to work with people who are hardcore into tech as me (and not be embarassed when people clock me reading a website that sya news for nerds on it).

    25. Re:It takes more than that by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your ananova story is really stupid.

      Of course you lose weight if you eat much less!

      It doesn't make it healthy or even meeting the dietary requirements for an average person.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    26. Re:It takes more than that by aconkling · · Score: 1
      Knowing how to use technical things in the prescribed manner does not make you a geek, any more than knowing the exits on an airplane makes you a flight attendent. Knowing how to use technical things in ways they were never meant to be used makes you a geek. (and this is only one small definition "geekiness.")
      I see your point, but I just want to add some food for thought: according to your definition, using Linux or C (just examples) in their "prescribed manner" doesn't make you a geek. I would disagree. I think it's really more a question of motivation and enthusiasm, and simply doing things "out of the box" doesn't really make you a geek.
    27. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is what meant by "know your facts", I'm surprised what else you might consider 'factual'. The story was indeed outright foolish.

    28. Re:It takes more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows doesn't suck. It "just works" and it's fast and it has a large selection of free and proprietary software available for it."

      Yes, that's true. But what does suck is:

      Their EULA
      Their disregard to what is fair use
      Their compatibility with other products
      Their business practices
      Their imposed artifical limitations (see EULA)
      Their lock-in, lock-out designs
      Their marketing machine
      Their lawyers
      Their assumptions about computer use
      Their security track record
      Their business interest put higher on than the list than the consumer

      To name a few. But of course those things many not be important to everyone.

      -

    29. Re:It takes more than that by ocbwilg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think yes. What he did/does is marketing, nothing to do with technology.

      I disagree. I think that Bill Gates, along with Paul Allen and the other early Microsofites are all geeks. The difference is that now that they're multi-millionaires and billionaires, you don't see as much of the geeking as you used to.

      If you read some of the histories of early Microsoft (or bios of Gates) I think you would be suprised. Bill dropped out of college because he was more interested in tinkering with early computers and writing software for them than getting his degree. The first company he formed with Paul Allen (Traf-o-data) was basically just the two of them building traffic monitoring computers and writing software for them, and then trying to sell them to cities for flow/congestion analysis.

      Bill himself was responsible for writing some of the early BASIC interpreters on multiple platforms in the late 70's and early 80's. They wrote CPU emulators because they couldn't get their hands on prototypes of early computing platforms but needed to write software for them. And this was the stuff that was going on when MS only had 8-10 employees.

      You might not like Bill Gates or Microsoft for what they are today, but it is absolutely ludicrous to pretend that he hasn't more than earned his chops as a geek.

    30. Re:It takes more than that by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      Windows doesn't suck. It "just works" and it's fast and it has a large selection of free and proprietary software available for it.

      The only part of that statement that's true is "Windows... has a large selection of ... proprietary software available for it."

      --
      I do not have a signature
    31. Re:It takes more than that by necrognome · · Score: 1

      I think this is sufficient geek cred for Bill G. He is so much more hardcore than you.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    32. Re:It takes more than that by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Actually, thanks to the F/OSS community, it has a large amount of free (as in both speech and beer) software as well. Surely you've hooked up a few people who didn't want to switch to Linux with Firefox, OpenOffice,(or whatever F/OSS apps you like) et cetera?

    33. Re:It takes more than that by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      Do me a favour! You are suggesting that Bill Gates, the guy who built a technology company that changed the entire planet and based on the success attained a personal fortune that is larger than the GDP of many countries is someone who is "fascinated by technology but doesnt know what to do with it!"

      Well, yeah. The only piece of software he ever actually wrote was an implementation of BASIC. His first big product, MS-DOS, was purchased outright from the company that developed it. Windows was just a graphical shell for DOS. Windows NT was done by a guy they hired away from Digital. And so on and so forth.

      So, yeah. Gates may be a heck of a businessman, but I wouldn't put him in the geek category by the "knows what to do with it" definition.

    34. Re:It takes more than that by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Funny, but I barely ever watch television, go to about 2 movies a year, had decent parents, take showers on a daily basis, have no desire to be like anything else in particular and STILL want to code for some reason. Could it be I just happen to like something?

    35. Re:It takes more than that by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      It seems that the better working definitions of "geek" and "nerd" are third party definitions that cross a gender line:

      A "geek" is someone that your GF doesn't want to sit at the same table with because the experience would ruin her lunch.

      A "nerd" is someone that your GF doesn't want to sit at the same table with because the experience would ruin her appetite.

      Those here who don't have a minimal working understanding of "GF" don't yet have a need to know what distinguishes a "geek" from a "nerd". For them it is a useless distinction unless and until they evolve into one of those Higher Life Forms whose attributes include a ProbabilityOfGfAttachment that is neither unassigned nor void.

    36. Re:It takes more than that by khallow · · Score: 1
      The only piece of software he ever actually wrote was an implementation of BASIC.

      That's a pretty weak argument since you just showed that he "knows what to do with it".

    37. Re:It takes more than that by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you read some of the histories of early Microsoft (or bios of Gates) I think you would be suprised. Bill dropped out of college because he was more interested in tinkering with early computers and writing software for them than getting his degree.

      He was expelled from college because he stole computer time to develop the BASIC software that launched Microsoft.

    38. Re:It takes more than that by Al+Dimond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being a geek isn't about technology. I know lots of geeks that aren't really all that fascinated with technology. They might be art geeks, language geeks, philosophy geeks or math geeks, and when I (as a computer geek) talk to those people it's like we're speaking a common language. It's the language of inquiry and passion for understanding. They want to understand a bit about why I get so pissed off at BellSouth or SCO, or what Linux is (and I usually tell them "It's acutally GNU/Linux" and then go off on a Stallmanesque rant). I want to understand the difference between artistic and musical minimalism or what the Incompleteness Theorem actually means.

      Wow, I must have forgotten to take my cynicism pill before that post.

    39. Re:It takes more than that by RedCard · · Score: 1

      He was expelled from college because he stole computer time to develop the BASIC software that launched Microsoft.

      I don't know if that's true or not and I'm too lazy to look it up, but if it is, in a way, that makes him even geekier.

    40. Re:It takes more than that by orin · · Score: 1

      Do you have anything to back that up? Wikipedia (for one) disagrees. Googling for Gates Expelled doesn't back you up (you'd think something like that would be everywhere). I've read a few histories that go over the whole Basic / Altair story and none of them state that Gates was expelled. Perhaps what you are thinking about is this: http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/random-bits/2 002-October/000952.html

    41. Re:It takes more than that by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      That is true, and with Cygwin you can work on Windows almost like it was a more serious operating system, but it's always a little bit more difficult. Where the F/OSS stuff "just works" on Linux often requires a bit of handholding on Windows.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    42. Re:It takes more than that by nathanh · · Score: 1

      He was threatened with expulsion and soon thereafter left "totally voluntarily". You connect the dots; he was told to leave voluntarily and save himself the embarrassment. That's the standard way for an administration to expel a troublesome student without creating paperwork.

    43. Re:It takes more than that by orin · · Score: 1

      Your claim was that he was expelled. He wasn't expelled, hence your claim is untrue. Your claim was not that he was threatened with expulsion, but that he was actually expelled. He wasn't expelled, hence your claim is untrue. If you look at the linked article you will see that he was pushed into putting his code into the public domain. That was the punishment, not expulsion. It sounds as though he was pissed off about the punishment and left, but he was not expelled, hence your claim is untrue.

  2. "Everyone's turning into one" by grub · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Not true.

    Owning an iPod and knowing how to download music doesn't make one a geek, that's just common knowledge nowadays. I hope the GeekBar is a bit higher than that.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Everyone's turning into one" by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Frankly the geek bar seems to be getting lower not higher.
      I know people that just because they can us Windows think they are a "Geek". I hate the term geek I like the term hacker. If you can not create technology then you are not a hacker. If you can code, solder, or wire wrap then you are a hacker. If you can IM you are not. If you can write an IM then you are.
      It is about creation not use.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:"Everyone's turning into one" by OneOver137 · · Score: 1

      Creation without true understanding is not geeky. Amateur astronomy is a perfect example of this. Lots of folks buy kilobuck telescopes that require very little in the way of astronomical knowledge to operate them. They hook up kilobuck CCD cameras, take pretty pictures, and then post them in forums thinking they are astrogeeks. Not so!

      I spent the better part of an hour trying to explain to a guy why his telescope wouldn't slew to Jupiter. He was mad because "all you had to do was push this button here..." Nevermind the fact that Jupiter wouldn't rise for several hours.

      Does the fact that I grind my own mirrors and build my own telescopes make me a geek? Not really. Crafty maybe. But the fact that I can find Jupiter on any given day and then get into a debate about the MTF of a telescope probably does.

    3. Re:"Everyone's turning into one" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Creation without true understanding is not geeky. Amateur astronomy is a perfect example of this. Lots of folks buy kilobuck telescopes that require very little in the way of astronomical knowledge to operate them. They hook up kilobuck CCD cameras, take pretty pictures, and then post them in forums thinking they are astrogeeks. Not so!"
      You kind of proved my point. They didn' create anything they bought it and put it together. Before you create anything you must understand it.

      "Does the fact that I grind my own mirrors and build my own telescopes make me geek? Not really. Crafty maybe. " I really hate the term geek. However yes it makes you a geek or as I would rather call you a hacker. If nothing else you are an optics hacker. To grind your own mirrors you must have an understanding of optics. As you see creation and understanding come hand in hand.
      "But the fact that I can find Jupiter on any given day and then get into a debate about the MTF of a telescope probably does." Okay I am guessing that MTF may mean "Mean time to failure" I could be wrong because while I did take an Astonomy class in college and I did get a good grade I am afraid that I am not an Astrogeek of your calibre. Anyway just how good of a grasp would anybody that has never built a telescope have on the MTF? I would guess very little.
      As I said you can not create without understanding.
      People that create are always different and a little scary to those that do not. Ever notice that Artists, musicians, authors, scientists, and computer programmers always seem odd or eccentric to "normal" people?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  3. Yeah, I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowadays, I constantly have to wear an umbrella because chicks are jumping me all the time...

  4. Everyone is a Geek. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Everyone. Everyone has that one area of passion in which they excel and have a knowledge of minutae. Be it Red Sox stats dating to 1903, the best ways to obtain and smoke drugs, or how to make a rocket- everyone is a Geek in one way shape or form. Now we're just finally realizing it.

    After all, how different is dressing up for a Star Trek Convention and a Football game? Not much...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by N1ghtFalcon · · Score: 1

      Once is acceptable by society's standards, the other one is not.

    2. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by trigeek · · Score: 3, Funny
      "After all, how different is dressing up for a Star Trek Convention and a Football game? Not much..."

      Spoken like a true Star Trek geek...

      --
      Sometimes I doubt your committment to SparkleMotion!
    3. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


      how different is dressing up for a Star Trek Convention and a Football game?

      You won't get home from the convention with hot-wing sauce smeared on your face and Bud spilled down your uniform.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by tommers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well one big difference is that the number of people in American society who dress up for Star Trek Conventions is smaller by many orders of magnitudes than the number of people who dress up for Fotoball games.

      Not everyone has passion, but more importantly the level of passion for traditional interests like baseball still has much more breadth and depth than baseball.

      I agree the geek is "more" chic, especially in certain tech-conscious areas like the valley, but I think the article and this post perceive it to be a much more significant trend than is justified by the info provided.

      And to look at it from another perspective, I think modern politics have reflected an increase in anti-intellectualism. This was most apparent in the success of the the 2004 Bush/Cheney campaign and an antagonism towards science the Intelligent Design issue seems to have espoused/surfaced. And while geeks might not value the "cultured" aspect of intellectualism, they still seem to be pro-intellectual.

    5. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by MattyDK23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone. Everyone has that one area of passion in which they excel and have a knowledge of minutae. Be it Red Sox stats dating to 1903...

      Shh! Do you want to be sued?

    6. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on the team. From what I've observed, Star Trek geeks are more accepted by society then (rabid) Oakland Raiders fans (and Raiders Fans aren't particularly accepting of fans of the opposing team, at least at home games).

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    7. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      The difference? One of these events is a lot more likely to involve beer. Sadly, neither are likely to date very much.

    8. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      >than the number of people who dress up for Fotoball games. Glad to see you've heard of Fotoball. Sure hope it catches on...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    9. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by tsaler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't have any problem with the majority of what you said in your post. The only thing I take issue with is the claim about anti-intellectualism. I'll try to clarify.

      Anti-intellectualism is, to me, a belief that those who are academics or intellectually-inclined are bad. You'll find this sometimes, I hate to say it, in a lot of blue collar communities across the country. I come from one such community, though I didn't find the sentiment to be as strong as I have seen it elsewhere.

      What I think you see from time to time, though I won't be so bold as to attach it to the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign, is a similar philosophy that says academics aren't any better than mechanics or any other group of people. This is more along the lines of what I subscribe to, and what I think people from where I grew up tend to subscribe to.

      Intellectualism is held on a pedestal by some people. If somebody says that intellectuals and academics are no better than the rest of us, that is sometimes construed as "anti-intellectualism" I think.

      To use your Intelligent Design example, some folks out there believe that evolution just isn't so. That doesn't mean that teachers can't teach it in schools, but you would be missing the other half of the story if you didn't see the heavy disdain heaped upon the religious community by the so-called intellectuals for belieiving in creationism in the first place. I'm fairly certain most Intelligent Design advocates have no problem co-existing with evolution. I believe they would argue that it's the intellectuals who refuse to co-exist with their beliefs. Whether any of that is actually true I won't begin to address here.

      I've heard people complain that they suffer from anti-intellectualism, and I've heard people make what I think you would consider "anti-intellectual" statements of their own. So I'm not coming at this from one side or the other.

      I'm more educated than the average American based on the statistics, but I dislike the superiority complex of some academics/intellectuals as much as the next guy. I don't think I'm anti-intellectual; I just think academics and intellectuals are in the same boat as the rest of us. I'm seriously opposed to the idea of philosopher-kings, and it bugs the heck out of me when professors in particular get their heads in the clouds like that from time to time.

      If you are thinking of a more specific example of anti-intellectualism within the Bush-Cheney campaign I'd be happy to address it, but I think you might be projecting general criticisms of conservatives in American politics onto a specific campaign when maybe it's not the most accurate thing in the world.

      Just my two cents.

    10. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by Heembo · · Score: 1

      After all, how different is dressing up for a Star Trek Convention and a Football game? Not much...

      Uh, putting on a little face paint is way different than dressing in full on starship officer uniform, along with starfleet phaser rifle, with working communicator badge and a special 24th (or whatever) century haircut to match. Not to mention learning a fake language and grunting at everyone to show just how much of a star trek GEEK you are! *grinz*

      And hey, one of my worst memories as a kid was watching my fathers reaction as he drove me to a dungeons and dragons convention all dressed up like a wizard! He was not pleased.... But If I was going to a football game in fan regalia, he would have been stoked!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    11. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by tommers · · Score: 1

      Great response. Much appreciated.

      I guess to respond to the Bush-Cheney point (which I would certainly still support, though throwing it out there rather casually does come from being insulated in an environment of disdain for this administration). But to be more specific, I was referring to the campaigns success in creating an association between Kerry's intellectual nature and speaking style and general sentiments of distrust. They successfully took a president who made a point of avoiding information more than any president in recent memory and acting on his gut and were able to use these traits as selling points. It seems there are a lot of people who think there is a strong correlation between how much you would want a particular person at your BBQ and how much you would want that person in your Oval Office. This approach was perceived to have a lot of resonance with Americans, and good or bad, I think its fair to say that if what we describe as "anti-intellectualism" was not as strong in America, this approach would have been less successful.

      I do agree that many accusations of "anti-intellectualism" are rooted in a form of elitism, though just because the E-word has a negative connotation, I don't regard it as negatively as some. Critics of anti-intellectualism (like myself) don't believe that people with less education or a less intellectual/analytical approach are as suited to solve many problems compared to those who are more educated or more intellectual/analytical. This is exemplified in the ID arguments by the general perception that religious authorities are just as valid judges of what constitutes science as those who practice science. Or that presidents who make a point of ignoring information and viewpoints that conflict with their own are just as well suited to make decisions as presidents who don't try and shield themselves from information that conflicts with their guts.

      There was an interesting article in Rolling Stone about ID ( http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/80 92015 ) that argued that the ID proponents big secret was that their intentions were religious and they didn't truly respect the scientific process and looked upon scientists with distrust, but that the other side's big secret was that they didn't truly respect religious viewpoints and looked upon religious people with disdain.

      So I agree it is a problem when "pro-intellectuals" have disdain for people they deem less educated or informed. But even if we all may be in the same big boat of humanity, personally, I'd rather not have many of the smaller points such as science and foreign policy sink because we are afraid to admit that we'd rather have people who are educated about sailing captain these boats.

    12. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by Schickie · · Score: 0

      Fotoball is pre-digital Virtual Futbol, you drok.

    13. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by tsaler · · Score: 1

      I guess to respond to the Bush-Cheney point (which I would certainly still support, though throwing it out there rather casually does come from being insulated in an environment of disdain for this administration).

      I kind of thought that's where it came from, which is the reason why I replied. I think it's fair to accuse this administration of any number of things, but one of the unfortunate side effects of being relatively unpopular (especially on the Internet and sites like this) is that it starts to get to the point where people blame them for the sun going down. I think you were still well within the bounds of legitimate criticism with your point though, so I'm not talking about you so much as I'm making a general statement.

      But to be more specific, I was referring to the campaigns success in creating an association between Kerry's intellectual nature and speaking style and general sentiments of distrust. They successfully took a president who made a point of avoiding information more than any president in recent memory and acting on his gut and were able to use these traits as selling points.

      Okay, this makes more sense to me. I see what you're trying to say now. I'm not sure what it means to you but the Nixon administration was pretty similar to this one in terms of how often the President would hold press conferences and so on. The Reagan administration also seemed to control events similarly to this one. So, it's not unprecedented, but it's a fair critique.

      Now, one thing about "nuance," which is a nice favorable word to use describing some of Kerry's positions during his political career and the 2004 campaign in particular, is that it seems to require the audience to have a certain level of understanding and knowledge in order for it to be successful.

      Let's take one of Kerry's statements as an example, because I think it's the most common one people think of when they think of Kerry in 2004. "I voted for it before I voted against it," he said in regards to the $87 billion in supplemental funding for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, that is a nuanced statement. People who don't know the details are going to hear that, and did hear that, and think, "This guy is trying to have it both ways!"

      The reality was that the votes on that bill were set up in a structure called "King of the Hill," which means that the last vote is the one that counts. What the Senate leadership did on the supplemental bill is that they scheduled the last vote to be on the bill without the amendments that had been made to it by some Democratic members.

      Kerry had in fact voted in favor of the bill with some amendments earlier on in the process. But the last vote was the one without the amendments, which was the one that counted. He voted against it, and so he really did vote for it before he voted against it. Now the campaign presumably didn't think they could or wanted to put together a campaign ad, a brochure, a line in the stump speech or anything to actually explain all of that.

      So, it got picked up and spun into this huge "Kerry is a flip-flopper" argument, and the other part of it was that he was a wishy-washy academic who you couldn't trust to tell you the truth and be straight with you. The latter argument is the one that I think really had the most impact. People who never spoke to me about politics before were telling me that they were voting for Bush in 2004 because they couldn't trust Kerry to tell them the truth. Now, you could take that apart all you want and say Bush is a bigger liar or what have you. I'm not really inclined to get into that right now.

      In my view, it wasn't his speaking style that was used to create a sense of distrust. For example, what was intellectual about Bill Clinton's down-home, raspy Southern accent? And yet he was roundly criticized for being untrustworthy. "Slick Willie," they used to call it in his campaign. Now, was there a case of anti-Southernism in the Bush 1992 campaign when political

    14. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well one big difference is that the number of people in American society who dress up for Star Trek Conventions is smaller by many orders of magnitudes than the number of people who dress up for Fotoball games.

      I bet it's about the exact same. I don't have any evidence either way but, then again, I'm betting you don't either.

      Remember, of the 30,000 who GO to the game, it's usually a few dozen at most who dress up for it.

    15. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by c4ffeine · · Score: 2, Funny

      What conventions do you go to?

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    16. Re:Everyone is a Geek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few dozen might put on face paint or dress up like the mascot but thousands wear jerseys of their favorite player or general team branded cloathing like sweatshirts, jackets and hats. Just like a few trekies will go all out and wear the makeup to look like a klingon but most will just wear a star fleet uniform or a star trek t-shirt.

  5. The country formerly known as Great Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now known as Pepsi UK.

  6. And geek is not chic. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until the high school cheerleaders start hanging out at the chess club, geek ain't chic.

    This is just about toys. Pre-packaged, nearly idiot proof, toys.

    1. Re:And geek is not chic. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Honestly I could care less about the cheerleaders. What I'm happiest about with this "geek revolution" is that suddenly...a lot of the things that used to be mocked and uncool are cool. What this does is cause a lot more um...to put it bluntly...HOT girls to hang out with geeky guys because they now share similar interests. I'm talking about things like anime...video games...MMORPGs, etc.

      And yes, I realize there are many people who are attracted to these things because they're suddenly "cool", but many stayed away from them in the past because of the stigma that was attached to them. That stigma is fast disappearing.

      So while we don't get to feel all special because we're into the things that are now mainstream, I for one welcome it. I'm excited that I get to enjoy my hobbies with a wider range of people now and not be looked at funny when I mention them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:And geek is not chic. by packeteer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone may be turning into a geek but on slashdot we are still all just dorks.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:And geek is not chic. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      HOT girls to hang out with geeky guys because they now share similar interests. I'm talking about things like anime...video games...MMORPGs, etc.

      that hot elf babe you picked up on wow -- she's not a girl. i know she sent you some 'pics' of her at her 'porn site' but dude, it's just a guy fucking with your head ;)

    4. Re:And geek is not chic. by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you would be suprised at how "geeks" are looked upon by your average girl, no matter what any news article or study says. notice i said your everyday normal girl, hot or not. Sure there are girls here and there that do web design, do a little gaming, and know how to do more on their computers other than IM, add to her 'myspace' and type something up in Word, but for the most part girls are right brained..fascinated by art, fashion & design, cooking, interior design and other things that fall closely into that category. I have found that most girls i talk to, chat with or come in contact with shutter in amazement or just give me the "deer in the headlights look" when the infamous question comes up.."so..what do you do for a living?" and/or "what do you like to do?" and i tell her that i am a C++ programmer and i do OpenGL programming on the side, i have a LAN at home(which leads to a whole other explanation if she is bold enough to ask) and i like playing video games. She might think its cool or even muster that to you but in the back of her mind she is thinking how much in common this guy would have with me and the answer would be about 0.05%. Ohhh he is a programmer so he must smart and he has a LAN?? huh? what a nerd.. likes playing video games? what a socialphobe..umm i want to have kids thank you...i dont want to marry a 10 year old still playing video games...this is what i think your average girl would think.. but hey i could be wrong..

    5. Re:And geek is not chic. by montibbalt · · Score: 1

      Of course, there is an exception in my case. I'm president of my school's computer club and I hang out with a cheerleader. I also do track, so maybe I'm just weird.

    6. Re:And geek is not chic. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      And yes, I realize there are many people who are attracted to these things because they're suddenly "cool", but many stayed away from them in the past because of the stigma that was attached to them. That stigma is fast disappearing.

      Well, maybe it's just about the adoption of a new industry. 20 years ago, the video game, as well as the computer industry were at their infancy. Now that technology has progressed to the point where it's interesting and entertaining to adopt the new tech for non-tech people, it's becoming more mainstream and accepted. The fact that you were excited about a technology before everyone else grabbed onto it makes you a geek.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:And geek is not chic. by MutantHamster · · Score: 1
      Two cheerleaders at our school have read A Brief History of Time, and are also on the Policy Debate team.

      Although, all that proves is that they are the exception to the rule.

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    8. Re:And geek is not chic. by jZnat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean nerds...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    9. Re:And geek is not chic. by middlemen · · Score: 1

      And chic(s) is(are) not geek(s).

    10. Re:And geek is not chic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this does is cause a lot more um...to put it bluntly...HOT girls to hang out with geeky guys because they now share similar interests. I'm talking about things like anime...video games...MMORPGs, etc.

      You seem to be confusing "dorky" with "geeky."

    11. Re:And geek is not chic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! You're wrong, she's real, I know it!

  7. What makes a geek by helmutvs · · Score: 0

    Geek = slashdot user

    --
    There are no uninteresting things. There are only uninterested people.
    1. Re:What makes a geek by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 2, Funny
      Geek = slashdot user

      Nononononononononono. News for nerds. Not news for geeks.

      The true geeks are all somewhere else, having much more fun.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    2. Re:What makes a geek by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, get outta here, you geeks!

    3. Re:What makes a geek by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      But... but... ThinkGeek is selling a /. t-shirt... that doesn't... make... sense... *head explodes*

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  8. Essence of Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does no one consult authoritative sources anymore, like Wikipedia?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeks

    This notion that the Greeks had a common descent was then comparatively recent. As Thucydides observes, the name of Hellas spread from a valley in Thessaly to the Greek-speaking peoples after the formation of the text of Homer (the Panellenes of Il. 2.530 are the troops of Thessaly, contrasting with the Achaeans), not long before his own time. This places the idea in the Archaic period, when Greek-speakers discovered that the world was wider, wealthier, and more cultured than they had hitherto imagined. Homer's Trojan War is, indeed, a conflict among Greeks: the Trojans speak Greek, bear Greek names, and worship the Greek gods; and Priam is descended from Zeus (see Alaksandus). The Carians are the only people Homer considers barbarophonoi.

    1. Re:Essence of Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude this chic is hot, thanks for the link (which led me to it

    2. Re:Essence of Geek by method77 · · Score: 0

      I am a greek geek. Yes I am. I can prove it. I smoke too much.

  9. I'm a geek now! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Funny

    Like, omg, I'm so totally a geek now! I can IM, and sync my ipod, and blog, and post myspace pix! And like, even I know that those popups are annoying!

    I am SO geek!!!!

    1. Re:I'm a geek now! by lucifig · · Score: 1

      You have nothing to worry about, your username cements your geekosity. (And I do mean that in the best possible way).

    2. Re:I'm a geek now! by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

      lmao'd reading that. Thanks.

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  10. Essence of Geek? by thaerin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a line of new cologne from Ralph Loren aimed at today's IT workers.

    --
    If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
    1. Re:Essence of Geek? by xlr8ed · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's smells like a mix of Dorito's and Mom's basement

    2. Re:Essence of Geek? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like a line of new cologne from Ralph Loren aimed at today's IT workers.

      Sold in compressed air duster cans

    3. Re:Essence of Geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't apply it with the can upside-down, and you'll be fine.

    4. Re:Essence of Geek? by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      compressed air duster cans

      Is that what geeks are calling their colons these days?

    5. Re:Essence of Geek? by POKETNRJSH · · Score: 1

      16 bucks for 2 cans of compressed air...it's just as expensive at cologne.

    6. Re:Essence of Geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's the the air can that smells, not me. Honest...

  11. Attachments by Malc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anybody who saw Attachments will know that the so called "geeks" it portrayed were nothing like the pale and socially inept people of real life. Entertaining enough though.

    Q: You know how a geek likes you?
    A: He looks at your shoes.

    1. Re:Attachments by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I remember Attachments. Humourless, drug-sodden nonsense. Never met a "geek" who was a dope-arsed, trendy drip like the ones in that series. Those I know are quite confident (at least, amongst other geeks). They should've sent ESR into that office — he'd've soon sorted them out.

      First Doctor Who and now this... the Jason King re-runs on ITV4 are the only thing worth watching these days.

    2. Re:Attachments by The+Standard+Deviant · · Score: 0

      I didn't even know there was an ITV4!

  12. Essenes of Greek? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

    I have been reading too many Doctor Bronner's Castile Soap labels!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Essenes of Greek? by bfischer · · Score: 1

      He was definitely a kook, but it is great soap.

  13. I don't know about rockstar by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I still don't have my 5000 groupie girls who would spread their legs open for me en masse'....however, when I meet girls and i tell them I program they pretty much go "oh wow, you must make a lot of money" and then i snicker to myself in sadness...obviously i don't argue with them (what girl wants a poor guy) but hey :) It is, however, more accepted. I know many hot girls who love places like myspace, AIM, etc.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:I don't know about rockstar by dada21 · · Score: 0

      (what girl wants a poor guy)

      Every girl.

      Hit me up with an e-mail. I have an e-book about dating advice for poor bald fat geeks. I dated many hot girls, married one -- they all thought I was poor.

    2. Re:I don't know about rockstar by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Interesting
      While I got the tone of your post, I'd like to point out that there is a distinction with the current trend of geekiness from before.

      Before, in the tech boom, people thought it was cool to be a geek because if you were good with computers, you must make a lot of money, and people don't want to work, so they want to be married to someone who makes a lot.

      Nowadays people are actually interested in what we geeks are as opposed to just our earning potential (however misinformed they may be about that).

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:I don't know about rockstar by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I still don't have my 5000 groupie girls who would spread their legs open for me en masse'

      Computers piss people off. Why would making something that people see as a necessary evil want to fuck you?

      If a rock band can attract 20,000 people or more to get together and have a good time and party, that is what people want to do. The reason they get laid is because if they can make 20,000+ people feel good for a couple hours, then they might be a good fuck too. Plus they are leaders and successful, which also has attraction as a mate.

    4. Re:I don't know about rockstar by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Computers piss people off

      Not always

      Plus they are leaders

      Being a rockstar does not make one a leader - not even close. They just happen to play some tunes that some people find enjoyable enough to come and see...entertainers yes, leaders MAYBE, but I would never think of an entertainer as a leader unless they did something extra - like well lead.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:I don't know about rockstar by ksheff · · Score: 1

      when I meet girls and i tell them I program they pretty much go "oh wow, you must make a lot of money" and then i snicker to myself in sadness..

      That's better than "oh, you're too smart for me. good bye".
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    6. Re:I don't know about rockstar by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I would never think of an entertainer as a leader unless they did something extra - like well lead.

      OK. What is a leader? The best definition is "The foremost animal, such as a horse or dog, in a harnessed team."

      Rock stars are on stage, up higher than everybody else, nobody at the place can speak louder than they can, everybody in the audience faces them, the people cheer them on, the people congregate to see them just as though they were seeing a politician or priest. If thats not what a leader is, I don't know what one is.

    7. Re:I don't know about rockstar by pklinken · · Score: 0

      You know, i recently switched over from studying CS to music (specifically, jazz piano) and every time i introduce myself to someone i remember how it used to be:
      'I study CS'
      'Oh. Great.'
      As compared to:
      'I study jazz piano.'
      'Oh really?! That's really great! I got this cousin who ... etc'

      It's sad to see that it makes such a big difference but generally i enjoy the enthousiastic response :)

    8. Re:I don't know about rockstar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's better than "oh, you're too smart for me. good bye"

      If only women I knew could tell me that before I date them for two months.

    9. Re:I don't know about rockstar by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      That's better than "oh, you're too smart for me. good bye".

      I don't know any girls who say that, well at least not to me. Maybe if I was smart and arrogant about it? Like the one guy from Beauty and the Geek 2... he was the guy, on the first episode, that won the competition...he became a complete ass....I tell you what, on that show, all those geeks have is the fact they are nice and sympathetic (like a lost puppy) :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:I don't know about rockstar by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      OK. What is a leader? The best definition is "The foremost animal, such as a horse or dog, in a harnessed team." Rock stars are on stage, up higher than everybody else, nobody at the place can speak louder than they can, everybody in the audience faces them, the people cheer them on, the people congregate to see them just as though they were seeing a politician or priest. If thats not what a leader is, I don't know what one is.

      The best definition for leader that you could get was that? Since you used dictionary.com, go back to it and look at entries 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b). They are all much better then your horse example. Or you could skip to 9 and use the "a pipe for conducting liquid".

      The definition of leader is broad, but being a rock star and in the lime light does not make you a leader...it makes you a rock star.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    11. Re:I don't know about rockstar by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      The definition of leader is broad, but being a rock star and in the lime light does not make you a leader...it makes you a rock star.

      limelight n Definition: focus of attention

      People pay attention to what is important to them, including people. Leaders have it first, and the rest either want it and give up, or they just follow.

      If you have ever seen a good rock-n-rool band, go outside after the show and look at all the people following the band to the next show. People follow leaders.

      I'm gonna sing you a hundred verses in ragtime
      I know this song it ain't never gonna end
      I'm gonna march you up and down the local county line
      Take you to the leader of the band

    12. Re:I don't know about rockstar by sancho7124 · · Score: 1

      You get to talk to girls ... wow, I don't know what to say to them unless they are dressed as Counselor Troy at the Star Trek Con.

    13. Re:I don't know about rockstar by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I don't have cable, so I can't comment on that show. The woman in my example had just asked where I worked and that was her response to my answer.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    14. Re:I don't know about rockstar by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I don't have cable, so I can't comment on that show. The woman in my example had just asked where I worked and that was her response to my answer.

      Then, as I am sure you already know, she ain't worth the time of day. Thats the kind of girl that I take to bed, and kick her out five minutes after I am done with her - telling her she should try not to embarass herself by calling me again.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  14. Book of Revelations? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    "For a few years, an interest in computers and technology became inextricable linked with wealth and power -- geek became chic"

    I'm pretty sure this is one of the signs of the apocalypse

    1. Re:Book of Revelations? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this is one of the signs of the apocalypse

      Yep... Jesus got it right. The geek shall inherit the earth. Now where are the cheese makers?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:Book of Revelations? by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

      there's a typo in the bible
      it should have been "...and the geek shall inherit the earth".

      :)

      --
      remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  15. Anorak? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Funny

    unlike nerd and anorak, which still tend to be used as insults Dude, I would HATE to be called an anorak! After all, who WOULD want to be identified as "a usually pullover hooded jacket long enough to cover the hips". So insulting.

    1. Re:Anorak? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1
      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    2. Re:Anorak? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Aha -- that explains it, thanks.

    3. Re:Anorak? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      To put things into perspective...think of the Dwayne Dibbly character that the Cat sometimes plays on Red Dwarf.

    4. Re:Anorak? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Oh, dammit dude now you're giving me nightmares *shudders*.

      explanation linky for the great undwarfed: http://www.layke.net/funny/5-4l.jpg

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  16. etymology by globaljustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from TFA

    The modern word surfaced in American slang in the early 20th century, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, and continued to refer to various kinds of oddballs. The OED records this example from the 1916 Wells Fargo Messenger: "A new Wells agent struck our town the other week, and say you never saw a more enthusiastic geek!" By the 1950s Webster's dictionary recorded that the word referred to a carnival sideshow weirdo "whose act usually includes biting the head off a live chicken or snake".

    At some point, the word began to be used to refer to people with an interest so obsessive that it puts them outside the mainstream -- as it still is used to talk about people with an inordinate knowledge of, say, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. However, it's most immediate association is now with technology, and particularly with people who actually make technology work.

    I've found 'geek' to be neutral at best in common usage, and nerd always is negative. Now being 'rich' as opposed to being a 'geek'...I've found the former is always better socially, but is directly proportionate to the latter.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  17. Ancient Geek Mythology by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He claims that increasingly, "we're all geeks" -- even if a lot of people don't care to admit it.

    I remember when a geek was a guy who was extremely intelligent, read books, didn't dress well or had the latest fashions, never had a good haircut/hygiene, was not good at sports and never made out with girls.

    If we are all indeed 'geeks' than the word geek doesn't mean anything. Or maybe we're just all nerds trying to be geeks?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Ancient Geek Mythology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bahh!!

      I remember when a Geek was the guy in the sideshow who bit the head off of a chicken. Those were the days!

    2. Re:Ancient Geek Mythology by Ibag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The way language is used changes over time. Just as "liberal" was not always a pejorative, the term "geek" is being used either in a different context or possibly in a completely new way. Part of the reason language can shift like this is because words are defined by examples of their usage. There is no clear and objective standard for judging when an activity is "fun" or a pigment is "red" (I challenge you to, on a 256 color palette, decide which shades are clearly red and which are clearly not red. If you put every shade in one category or the other, your best friend will probably disagree on at least some of your decisions, though you probably won't be confident about it either). So too, there is no clear definition of geek.

      "Geek" was previously used to describe several, often overlapping groups of people; Geek described those who prefer math and computers to drinking or those who preferred Star Wars to women. Somehow, because of the correlation between "geekiness" and earnings potential, people felt the need to cast being in a geek in a more positive light and decided to focus on the relatively common (but not defining) tendency of geeks to be passionate about something. Passion bordering on fanatical zealotry that interferes in social interaction is not a requirement: I have heard people say things like "I'm a music geek" to mean as little as "I buy a few cds or 2 a month and go to a few concerts a year." As the common usage of the term changes, the definition changes. At this rate, in 10 years the term geek will be nothing but a meaningless modifier indicating slight interest.

      The problem is that while people don't want to view all "geeks" in a bad light because they see positives to being geeky, not all geeks are going to be deserving of praise for their geekiness, and so either "geek" will remain a pejorative depending on context or some other term will fill the niche of the formerly derogatory use of the word. When I was younger, there did not seem to be a large difference between "geek" and "nerd", but perhaps now "nerd" will become the formerly negative connotation of "geek"? Who knows?

      Language changes because we use many not quite equivalent definitions or examples to define terms, and as we shift from one definition to another, we change the canonical examples and alternate definitions. Do not be confused, though, geeks have not changed, only the usage of the term. Personally, I think that people changing the language I want to use is double plus ungood, but what can you do?

    3. Re:Ancient Geek Mythology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were talking about Richard Stallman... right?

  18. It had to be said. by DietCoke · · Score: 1

    "After all, how different is dressing up for a Star Trek Convention and a Football game?"

    Only one has attractive women attending.

    1. Re:It had to be said. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      No, they both have attractive women attending but in both cases they are paid to be there.

  19. So I'm chic, eh? by daddyrief · · Score: 1

    geek became chic.

    I was never chic. Scrawny, yes, but not chic.

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
  20. Quick recipe by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Essence of Geek:
    Serves: 1

    Ingredients:
    2 tbsp Mountain Dew: cooled to room temperature
    12 fl oz generic beer
    2 oz Cheetos: crushed to fine powder
    5 oz Bacon strips: fried till crisp
    0.5 lb butter: at room temperature
    0.5 lbs onions: ground to fine consistency
    2 nos. matured socks: preferably fermented for 3 days

    Preparation:
    Preparation Time: 5 minutes.

    Heat butter in pan until gently melting. Stir in remaining ingredients and simmer till delicious smell begins to whaffle through kitchen. Cool to room temperature, drain and apply in generous proportion.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Quick recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what kind of geek am I then?

      2 tbsp Mountain Dew: cooled to room temperature

      Uggh. Tea or water thanks.

      12 fl oz generic beer

      Are you kidding? I already drink enough water. Guinness please.

      2 oz Cheetos: crushed to fine powder

      Foul! I'd rather not have my fingers stained so that I look like a heavy smoker.

      5 oz Bacon strips: fried till crisp

      No flavour there either. Middle or back Danish bacon please. Canadian Peameal bacon will do if unavailable.

      0.5 lb butter: at room temperature

      Hmmm. Always preferred butter to marg.

      0.5 lbs onions: ground to fine consistency

      Prefer my onions chopped in big chunks so I can taste them. Probably want four times that amount with a few cloves of garlic sauted in Olive Oil.

      2 nos. matured socks: preferably fermented for 3 days

      I can't think of many things more gross. Besides, don't you like getting laid?

    2. Re:Quick recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wondered a second or two about what "Two tablespaces of mountain dew" could be..

    3. Re:Quick recipe by servognome · · Score: 1

      I just wondered a second or two about what "Two tablespaces of mountain dew" could be..

      Given the weight of most geeks, two tablespaces is just about right ;)

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  21. The Geek is dead. Long live the Geek! by davidgrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the guys who picked on me are geeks too?

  22. I don't see that. by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Nerds are people that are fascinated by technology. Geeks are people that are fascinated by technology, but know what to do with it."

    Case in point, Bill Gates is a nerd. Linus Torvalds is a geek. IMHO.
    I'd say the first person is just a toy-phile. It isn't the technology, it's the toy.

    They don't care about the GPS technology. But when it came out in a toy, they bought them.

    They can't tell the difference between xDSL and a cable modem. But they buy whatever claims to give them the fastest access.

    The toy-philes will be able to take a picture with their phone, email to their work account and print it on the colour printer there. But they won't know how to convert it to a different format or even that there are different formats.

    Driver
    Driver who takes advanced driving classes
    Mechanic
    Automotive engineer
    1. Re:I don't see that. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      won't know how to convert it to a different format or even that there are different formats.

      I'm sure Bill has had very detailed meetings about other specific graphic image formats recently.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  23. Geek = wealth? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When did wealth mean "big credit lines?"

    Most geeks I meet have negative net equity due to outrageous debt loads. Maybe it's just Chicago? It seems that every geek here thinks they can live like Sergei Brin.

    I wonder if all the common people see are (leased) BMW's, (interest-only mortgaged) 5-bedroom homes and (almost maxed out) platinum cards when they see supergeeks?

    Talk about keeping up with the Joneses.

    1. Re:Geek = wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... You're confusing Geek with Stock Broker. It's an easy mistake to make.

      Geeks are the guys who are still living in the basement of their parent's house with that awesome liquid helium cooled rack of CPUs.

    2. Re:Geek = wealth? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No kidding. Chicago has definitely taken a New York twist with what people go through to "keep up with the Joneses".

      Of course, neither you nor I are in a place to make an accurate statement about that because honestly, how are we to know how much they make? Not to mention that they may have other sources of income (geeks are more likely to invest their money than non-geeks).

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Geek = wealth? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I do a free clinic in the Chicago area to help people lose debt and build wealth. Most of my attenders are geeks earning $60k a year, and I turn away 3 geeks for every 1 I can help.

      I'm blown away by the foreclosure listings I receive from local banks. One local bank discloses a little more than it should regarding the current "owners" and I'd say 50% are in the IT field.

    4. Re:Geek = wealth? by bloosqr · · Score: 1

      My cousin just bought a 1 bedroom in Chicago for about $500k as a second weekend home. He is a doctor and can afford it but I think part of the problem is chicagos housing market is much more in vein w/ NYC/SF. I know people who make $65k be told by realtors and mortgage companies that they can buy a $500k home in SF. The problem is they dont see any homes in their area that are cheaper and all their friends have done the same thing (I think over 1/2 of new loans in SF are interest only now) and if the banks say they can be responsible for that sort of debt then it must be okay. The problem is $65k is only about $3k and change a month, and the people who make that want the downtown apartment ($1.5k+) and are probably right out of college (college loans) and feel a bit of indulgence coming on for their first proper job (Plasma, new car etc).

      I think part of the issue is that people who make $65k think they are rich. They are rich to some extent if they acted wisely, but the "mainstream" consumer culture lifestyle for the 20 something single crowd (i.e. $30 entrees at restaurants, $8 cocktails, downtown rental, design w/in reach, west elm furniture, whole foods shopping, $200 diesel jeans) are really catering to people who make $100k+ w/ no kids and comfortably w/ two incomes. So people who make $80k are surprised they've bled off so much of their $4k and change a month.

  24. Re:First Post? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 0, Troll

    Excuse me mods.

    mpitcavage is not a troll (not this post any way)

    He is just doing as bored geeks do.
    He is all we aim to be, the geek above all other geeks - the first poster.

    To the youngsters watching, learn from this one, he is wise.
    One day you too can aquire the essence of geek which oozes from his pores.
    Hang on, on second thoughts, your all best off having a shower and going playing football or somethin

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  25. Geek-Cred by Slipgrid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um...no. Owning an iPod and knowing how to use it doesn't make you a geek. Knowing how to use your Windows smartphone doesn't make you a geek. Discussing mobile phone design doesn't make you a geek, because from tfa, I don't think they were talking about protocols or other engineering aspects. Even knowing how to synchronize your email with your smartphone doesn't make you a geek. It makes you a slave, but not a geek.

    Yeah, but some teen who wants to *fit-in* with the geeky kids, might buy these things thanking it helps. It's like when you were in high school, and saw that guy walking about with a tie dye Dead shirt on. He wasn't a hippy, and likly never found a Dead song that he liked, and never when to the show, but he did buy a tie dye shirt. Very trendy.

    Now, I've got a cs degree, and I know I geek my friends out with blab that they don't care about, but I don't own an iPod because of the DRM issues. Some people might say that someone who won't buy an iPod because of the DRM issues is a bigger geek than someone who owns them. However, the article is making a point. It does't matter if these people have any geek-cred. It's obvious that they want that geek-cred, just like the dude with the tie dye shirt.

    1. Re:Geek-Cred by chowhound · · Score: 1

      I don't own an iPod because of the DRM issues. Some people might say that someone who won't buy an iPod because of the DRM issues is a bigger geek than someone who owns them.

      Actually, someone who owns a iPod and has neutralized the DRM is far more geeky than someone who refuses to buy one altogether.

    2. Re:Geek-Cred by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1
      I don't own an iPod because of the DRM issues

      Umm, what issues? The iTunes store uses DRM, but the iPod?

    3. Re:Geek-Cred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was never a hippy. I am a deadhead. The two are not _necessarily_ connected.

      I was that kid in school who was (probably considered a dirtbag) a badass, a rebel - whatever. I was the kid who people thought was crazy and weren't sure about. I spoke my mind, skipped classes incessantly, smoked, drank, did drugs, hung out with the older kids, etc. Hell, I never even graduated H.S., I wound up getting a GED.

      I was also the kid who got a 96 in biology, even though I barely ever went and *never* did homework (this pissed some people off to no end, let me tell you).

      I was the kid who got kicked out of AP chemistry, not because I couldn't do well (I scored among the highest in the class on the tests I took while I was there). I got kicked out because, "AP is different, you can't cut an AP class". Elitism, anyone?

      I was the kid that stood up for the "geeks". I was the one that saved a few of those "geeks" from getting their asses kicked.

      To me, a geek (notice there's no quotes around this one) is someone who is extremely proficient in an area. An expert, an uber-professional in a given field, if you will. That's it. Not someone who likes to read books. Not someone who is smart. Not necessarily a hacker.

      Me? I'm not a geek in the classical sense. Perhaps, the "person who has chosen concentration rather than conformity; one who pursues skill (especially technical skill) and imagination, not mainstream social acceptance." definition fits me. I'm a bit of a "jack of all trades, master of none".

      To me, the words geek, nerd, dork etc. are words borne out of desire to classiy people as somehow inferior (or superior, depending on one's vantage point).

      As for me, at this point in my life, if I _had_ to choose one; I'd consider myself more of a dork.

  26. why, WHY us? by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Funny
    those were the days cherished by the chosen few, kissed by the Geek God, his children were happy in their cubicles happily glued to their monitors..

    then came an article claiming that geekiness is actually "kewl", and people were actually yearning to be one. That marked the end of geekdom. Now every other person using ipod and knowing how to download firefox considers himself/herself a geek, making the existence of the actual geeks as minority. Maybe, the geeks would start yearning to be just normal, and then it would reverse..

  27. Using technology vs. controlling it by lawaetf1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No doubt the term "geek" has been coopted by the media to describe, basically, the digerati generation. But I have to agree with my fellow /.ers... using your ipod and knowing how to upload photos from your cell phone does not make you a geek.

    Geek's don't just use technology, they understand how it is put together and desire to change or "hack" it for their own purposes. A geek molds technology to suit him, a regular schmoe makes do with what has been handed his way by 3com, intel, microsoft, etc, etc.
    That is the difference.

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    1. Re:Using technology vs. controlling it by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      ...a regular schmoe makes do with what has been handed his way by 3com, intel, microsoft, etc, etc. ... and his/her geek friends. :-)

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  28. Oh, Geesh...my bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was so busy recompiling Debian for my Nintendo Gameboy (overclocked, of course, sitting in a vat of liquid N2) that I misread the headline and posted some gibberish about the Greek people...my bad ... naturally I saw "Greek" instead of "Geek" since I'm not familiar with the latter term.

  29. Windows isn't geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeks don't use Windows. Geeks are about control. Windows does not give you any. You're at the mercy of the media corporations, the virus writers, the spammers, and most of all Micro$oft. The only person controlling a Windows computer is Bill Gates. All the *real* geeks have moved on to better things like Linux.

    1. Re:Windows isn't geek by warith · · Score: 1

      Not all geeks are control freaks, and Windows is (unfortunately) essential for your gamer-variety geek. ;)

    2. Re:Windows isn't geek by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Geeks don't use Windows.

      I'm a software tech support geek. The people I deal with use Windows. Unless I used it, I wouldn't be able to help them very much. Instead of refusing to use it, I've turned myself into a specialist in Windows internals, so I can talk my customers through undoing the damage Windows has done to itself without either uninstalling/reinstalling the software or reinstalling Windows.

      Geeks do use Windows, when their job needs it, or they need to use a program that only exists for Windows. Geeks don't, however, think Windows is the be-all/end-all of computing.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  30. Glorious Geek Revolution by tokki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We are in the midst of the Glorius Geek Revolution. Sure, high school sucks for geeks. It sucked for me, and it still sucks for most geeks today, but the life after high school has dramtically changed for the geek, for the better.

    A lot of the rags to riches stories involves geeks. South Park's creators, Family Guy's creator, Matt Groenig, Woz and Steve Jobs.

    We live better lives than our geek forefathers. A smart, industrious geek these days often earns a better living and lifestyle than our jock counterpart.

    Society is getting geekier. Take cops shows. They used to be buddy films, the cool guys with street smarts driving cool cars in chase scenes. Now the top cop show is CSI. Geeks with badges, walking around with black lights, analyzing semen. NCIS, Law and Order, The West Wing, Adult Swim... culture has definately taken a turn for the geekier end of the spectrum.

    Nerd girls are doing well as well. I read somewhere that SNL producers were worried about Tina Fey in glasses, but it turns out it totally works, and she has tremendous appeal and talent.

    Of course, as we start having kids and they grow up, maybe they'll be jocks, and maybe they'll be teased unmercifully by the geeks.

    1. Re:Glorious Geek Revolution by carnifex0 · · Score: 1

      A lot of the rags to riches stories involves geeks. South Park's creators, Family Guy's creator, Matt Groenig, Woz and Steve Jobs.

      And Kevin Smith, and Quentin Tarentino....

    2. Re:Glorious Geek Revolution by 3fiddy · · Score: 1
      Of course, as we start having kids and they grow up, maybe they'll be jocks, and maybe they'll be teased unmercifully by the geeks.

      Except in reality, said jocks would simply pound said geeks into the floor. That's the advantage of being a jock in high school.

    3. Re:Glorious Geek Revolution by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Is the whole Geek/Jock division strictly an american thing?
      Because when i went to highschool most of the people who were better at sports also studied the Physics/CS thing.
      I really can't think of anyone i could characterize as a geek.

    4. Re:Glorious Geek Revolution by Webz · · Score: 1

      Your mention of analyzing semen just totally threw me off... But I digress.

      In regards to the whole jock-geek flip over, I've read a similar situation regarding obesity in America. As the percentage of obese, American children rises, it slowly becomes the norm. Then, suddenly, the thinner, not-so-fat kids are being picked on for being abnormal.

      Gross.

    5. Re:Glorious Geek Revolution by hb0mb · · Score: 1

      They used to be buddy films, the cool guys with street smarts driving cool cars in chase scenes. Now the top cop show is CSI. Geeks with badges, walking around with black lights, analyzing semen.

      uhhh... wtf

  31. The Essence of Geek by click2005 · · Score: 1

    When i first read that I thought they were reporting on a new perfume/aftershave by calvin Klein.

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  32. Worst. Perfume. EVAR. by Syberghost · · Score: 1

    (eom)

  33. What's That Smell? by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you what essence of Geek is. My friend, a sys admin, ate dinner at The Stinking Rose (they season your garlic with food) in San Francisco one night. The next day he had some serious gas. A co-worker, another IT person, went into his office said they smelled pizza and that it smelled good. He did not dissuade from that notion.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  34. The author must not be a geek by VampireByte · · Score: 1
    ...and Eric Reynolds, author of the influential open source manifesto The Cathedral and the Bazaar.


    A real geek knows that ERS is Eric Raymond.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:The author must not be a geek by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny
      A real geek knows that ERS is Eric Raymond.
      NO! It's E–S–R! Eric Steven Raymond, Open Source's Rottweiler.
    2. Re:The author must not be a geek by ggambett · · Score: 2, Funny

      A real geek knows that Eric Raymond is ESR, not ERS.

    3. Re:The author must not be a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it "Eric S. Raymond" and "ESR"?

  35. I loathe the contrived hipness of IBM by NickySantoro360 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is anyone else annoyed by IBM's seemingly endless marketing campaign that aims to be more "IT hip" with each commercial? I think IBM tries to play to this rising coolness with the computing industry (if there is one) by trying to be hip, but it just comes off as contrived and weak to me. annoying.

    -Santoro

    1. Re:I loathe the contrived hipness of IBM by santaliqueur · · Score: 0

      agreed. those commercials are so fucking annoying.

      --
      I do not accept czechs.
    2. Re:I loathe the contrived hipness of IBM by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you trying to say there is a marketing campaign that doesn't come off as contrived and weak? You do realize that all marketing campaigns are contrived, right?

      On an almost totally different subject (well, still ads, but a totally different industry), has anyone seen that damn Coke commercial with the penguins and the polar bears? Talk about idio-fucking-otic ads, everything is wrong with that one.

    3. Re:I loathe the contrived hipness of IBM by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      has anyone seen that damn Coke commercial with the penguins and the polar bears? Talk about idio-fucking-otic ads, everything is wrong with that one.

      Yeah! Penguins are Southern hemisphere and polar bears are Northern hemisphere! What a crock!

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  36. Re:First Post? - Funniest.Geek.Evar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn geek-bro, that made for a laugh riot.

  37. Not what a geek is... by RobinH · · Score: 3, Funny

    A geek isn't someone who knows how to use an iPod. A geek is someone who has all their Ogg Vorbis's on their bluetooth enabled PDA along with playlists, and he can walk from his house to his car to his cubicle without a skip in the beat because it seamlessly transfers between his home stereo, built in speakers in the PDA, his car stereo, and his computer's speakers at the office.

    Extra points for writing a new compression algorithm to store more songs on the PDA. Bonus if you have neon lights under your car that are synchronised to the music.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Not what a geek is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a real geek would use lossless compression, or none at all.

    2. Re:Not what a geek is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not to mention using a pair of HD650s to listen to them on. With a decent portable amp.

    3. Re:Not what a geek is... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like an audiophile to me. ;)

      Multimedia geeks are the ones who make things like Xiph.org, Xine, MPlayer, VLC, MPEG, etc.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  38. Essence for Geek by Dan+Ferguson · · Score: 1

    Isn't that like when a cat sprays in the corner?? 8)

  39. Re:It takes more than that (with a Cartoon) by wasthere · · Score: 1
    I summed up the Nerd thing this way:-

    http://www.users.bigpond.com/adriansbruce/cartoons /nerd!.jpg

    "After inventing fire, the wheel and Art, Trevor (Modern man) is introduced to a new word... NERD!" (by a Nethanderal)

    It has been those that have changed the world, advanced it, that have been called Nerds or Geeks by the great unwashed that couldn't rub two sticks together to make fire, or program their VCR. NOT everyone is a geek.

  40. It's the knowledge, stupid! by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The essence of geek has nothing to do with what you use, but with what you know about it; people break down into three groups:

    Group A: people who know only what they need to know to get along. This is actually a fairly small group; most people have a beyond-necessary level of interest/knowledge regarding something.

    Group B: people who have some (or quite a bit of) in-depth knowledge of one or two areas because they're interested, and are perfectly content with a "necessity" level of knowledge in everything else. This is most everyone.

    Group C: people who are interested in having in-depth knowledge for its own sake, and will always (given the opportunity) choose to know more about any given subject.

    "Geeks," as far as I can tell, are pretty much a subset of Group B, where the one or two areas of interest are math-, science-, or computer-related, and the level of knowledge is above some ill-defined, but relatively high, point. Linus is a geek. Da Vinci was not.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  41. The association... I don't like IT.. so bite me! by chivo243 · · Score: 0, Troll

    never bitten the head off of a chicken, live or dead. Has anyone looked up the traditional meaning of "geek"? please... I'd rather be the CD (computer dude) BC (big cheese, I work at a school), TG (tech guy) one 9 yr. old said "I want to be a wizard when I grow up too." but please, Geek^2, "A carnival performer who does wild or disgusting acts." Which had always been number one, until the Tech Era is not what I what to be associated with! Sorry case closed, end of story, hatchet buried, loose ends tied up, etc, etc...

    yeah, yeah, I graduated (HS) in the early 80's, and I do realize that language is a virus... Thanks Laurie Anderson...

    but a geek still bites the heads off of chickens in side shows for a buck.... I haven't bitten the head off a chicken ever! (L)users, ahh... we all know that story.

    --
    Sig Hansen?
  42. Who is Eric Reynolds? by Protectiva · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article: "Eric Reynolds, author of the influential open source manifesto The Cathedral and the Bazaar ."

    Um, what? Sloppy research or just a typo? These mainstream "Look how geek everyone is becoming! Even your has an iPod and is therefore a geek." articles really irritate me.

    --
    It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.
    1. Re:Who is Eric Reynolds? by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      It's worse than just a typo; they use the name 'Reynolds' again in a later paragraph. The author probably misread the name in his research, and no one else who handled the story ever noticed (or knew any better)...

    2. Re:Who is Eric Reynolds? by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 1

      They also misspelled "specifically" in the same paragraph, and since "specificall" isn't a word, this leads me to believe the proofreading of this article did not even include a simple spell checker.

      I'd say it's pretty much on par with the content.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  43. Off the ground? by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    "Einstein, who had a wardrobe full of identical clothing and saw nothing wrong with smoking cigarette butts collected off the street.

    Is that true? Somehow i cant see Einstein doing that. I guess if he was REALLY cheap, but most people that i know who smoke would never pick butts off the ground, even if they were broke. (they'd just bum one but thats not really the point)

    Anyways thats the first i ever heard of this. Anyone can confirm this very interesing anecdote?

    Well i just decided to google for it and it aparently is true.
    "Bernhard Caesar Einstein said in the letter written in 1998 that his grandfather collected the cigarette butts to circumvent his doctor's orders to stop smoking, reported the Sunday Telegraph."

    and thats the end of that mystery.*dusts hands*

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:Off the ground? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the clothing, but Einstein was a pipe smoker. I did read once, a story about him taking apart some cigarettes to use the tobacco in his pipe, but I can assure you the experiment didn't turn out well. I can't picture him ever scrounging butts off the street to resmoke, even if he'd been a cigarette smoker. It just doesn't sound like him.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  44. "Attachments" sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show features this particularly noxious character called Clippy. Each week the other characters ask "Who killed Clippy?," but the bastard keeps showing up the next week.

  45. We must be grateful... by butterwise · · Score: 0

    Many geeks died to bring us this information...

    --
    If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
  46. Re:Quick recipe - serious this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really...this is EXCELLENT...it looks gross, but tastes great

    1 Cup Root Beer, 1 Cup Orange Juice (with pulp preferably)
    Pour over partially melted Ice Cream in a bowl
    Stick salt&vinegar chips into the whole mess

    I'm not joking. It looks really gross, but it tastes fantastic

  47. How to be a Geek by lot3k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, I feel blessed that I maintain the social graces and ability to interface with women on a fairly regular basis.... well my wife anyway :) I don't know that as a whole you all aren't grabbing at straws to justify your own position as a geek. Truth be told, I'm called a geek, nerd, technogod, and addict by various people. Quite frankly the way I see it is if you are you know you are and it's not worth arguing about. It's more socially acceptable now for us to be infatuated with our technology and our abilities are becoming more appreciated (figured you would be happy not offended that you aren't the only one). I guess we are geeks for even arguing about what a geek is, constantly having a who's logical line is bigger over inconsiquential nonsense like this. The first time I went off rambling about the latest linux kernel source structure (back when I was 16) and how clean it was with such enthusiasim as to make the listening party look at me with the look of "please god don't hurt me" I knew I was a geek. For that matter, if you find you are consitently speaking with fellow nerds and it suddenly becomes very apparent they have no clue what you are talking about... you might be a geek.... neck?... sorry jeff foxworthy flashback sweet god, I'm talking about nothing... damned coffee

  48. THE 90's ARE OVER!! Please someone tell ZD! by jordinyc · · Score: 1

    Ziff Davis? Ziff freaking Davis? Isn't this the company that couldn't afford to keep a cable tv network about computers going, so they sold it to some other company, who couldn't afford to keep it on either so then THEY sold it to Comcast, who merged it with a channel about video games?

    And isn't that same cable channel, the one that only has one show left still about computers*, replacing shows about videogames with the Man Show, Star Trek TNG, and some stupid A-Team show with Bill Bellamy?

    And now ZD is talking about how geeks are hot?

    Sure the economy's getting a little better, but WE ARE NOT LIVING IN THE YEAR 1997 ANYMORE! The bubble burst a freaking long time ago! Sorry, but this kind of nostalgic ignorance really boils me.

    jordi NYC

    * PS: Attack Of The Show DOES NOT COUNT! AOTS is NOT the Screen Savers "blasted" with marketing ooze (self-censored). It's ... aw heck, I don't even know what that show's about anymore, other than pumping it's own ego. I'm speaking of the Canadian produced Call For Help. Leo Laporte still freakin' rules, as far as I'm concerned. (remember when blasted was called frosted? yeah, now that I'm reaching 40, my hair's getting a little blasted)

  49. A new cologne? by stavromueller · · Score: 0

    "Essense of Geek"... is that a new cologne by Calvin Klien? Or perhaps it's related to Pimp Juice?
    Hmmm?

    --
    I kill harmless processes for sport
  50. Not just UK TV... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Warner Brothers, in US, is doing a reality show too. Hot women vs. geeks. You can watch its season 2 on Thursday nights at 9:00 PM (assuming Los Angeles, CA).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Not just UK TV... by Random+Hacker · · Score: 1

      I heard about that show (I haven't seen it). I presume the women were paid a great amount of money.

    2. Re:Not just UK TV... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. The whole thing show is to win $250,000 (if I remember the price correctly) at the end of the season.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  51. Nerds are uniform wearers by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

    I wish all these geeks/nerds would stop copying eachother, and get a personality of their own. They are uniform wearers, just as the suits.

    Personally, having been into technology and computers from when I was a child, I hate being labelled just because of my field. I don't see a difference with people who have their 'thing' in other fields, be it sports, music, journalism, etc., and we aren't calling Jordan a sports geek and Madonna a music nerd. But when I know how to succesfully trigger an emacs vs vi flame war, I must start wearing cheap t-shirts, smelly sneakers (the uniform) and attach the well documented personality to it. No thank you.

    You guys with the 'proud to be a nerd' thing have a serious lack of identity. I feel sorry for you.

  52. Thanks to a particular geek by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    Whatever else you might think of Bill Gates, you gotta admire a geek that becomes a billionaire. That is a large part of why geek is no longer stigmatized.

    1. Re:Thanks to a particular geek by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      The guy I admire is this "Eric Reynolds", who according to TFA wrote some open source manifesto called "The Cathedral and the Bazaar". He sounds like a real hacker's hacker... no mere geek, y'know.

      Or maybe I just admire ZDNet's ability to publish pure tripe and get it to the front page of Slashdot.

      Or maybe not.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:Thanks to a particular geek by chrish · · Score: 1

      Gates started rich. It's trivial to make even more money when you've already got millions at your disposal.

      Just look at Donald Trump. He's a terrible business man (but an excellent media whore); his fortune was inherited, not made.

      Also note that both of them have horrible hair cuts. All that money, and they can't find a decent barber...

      --
      - chrish
  53. Toleration by schlichte · · Score: 0

    Being a "geek" seemed to become the "cool" thing to be after people started finding out they could get stuff for ""free" ie. games, software, music, movies, etc... This obviously does not define what a geek is. Just the misinformed trying to think they are.

  54. Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the only one who gets talk, that's nice freaks.

  55. Re:Essence of Geek'snot the knowing; issa doing! by ncurtain · · Score: 0

    A young man I was and an old man I am...

    Or to put it another way: Being clevva isn't doing clevvah.

    As for example, being a geek would get you here: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/200401518 00.gif from there: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.htm l

    But how many of you can work out what to do with it?

    Actually, there is a misnomer involved; as the ancient empire got its greatness from war and only learned what was well known to other empires by conquest (very ungeek.)

    Seeing as Alexander died in his thirties and his generals spent the remaining generations to Rome fighting each other, it isn't suprising that the Roman empire lasted so much longer....

    Never mind about all that crap. I'll tell you what, if you really are a geek, I will give you the answer for the above if you can find out how to ask me for it. Clue:
    It's Greek to me. But it is more your North African, in reality.

  56. youre all funny!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny it seems.. with the posting of that article /. has just given birth to the "geek snob" trying to justify thier geekiness by saying that everyone else is not one, funny, a few years ago no one wanted to be one.. remember, you read it on /. first :P PS. let the flaming of me commence.. bring it on geeks!!! http://www.ps3grill.com/

  57. It must be true by Busy · · Score: 1

    Proof that the *geek* is going mainstream - all the old-school geeks complaining that the term is being used too broadly, and these aren't real geeks.

    --
    Think of someone with average intelligence. Now think 1/2 the world is dumber than that guy.
  58. A *real* geek.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But a *real* geek wouldn't have an endianness bug in his initial routine.

  59. The Essence of Geekness by elmartinos · · Score: 1

    Watch it here.

  60. Give me.... by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

    To quote Jack Nickolson and Tom Cruise...

    I want the Geeks, The whole Geek and nothing but the Geeks!
    YOU CANT HANDLE THE GEEKS!
    __________________________________________________
    Will the real slim-shadey.. err.. reeel-geeks please stand up, please stand up...

    --
    This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
    Catahoula!
  61. Not Ralph Loren... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a new fragrance by Ralph Lorien.

    1. Re:Not Ralph Loren... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are not Geek, just gay?

  62. Can you change from non-geek to geek later? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some ways I used to be the antithesis of geek. For example, my college experience- joining a frat and "Fear and Loathing in..." Berkeley, California. If people really knew what things I did earlier in life... haha. Considering how much work I now do with computers I am wondering if I have changed into a geek. That would seem to be the opposite of how many people evolve.

  63. What that essence really is by ehiggins · · Score: 2, Funny

    Around where I work, this "Essence of Geek" of which you speak is BO.

    1. Re:What that essence really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it's the dank cheesy smell of the sweater I wear every day. It really takes time and perseverence (at least two weeks without laundering) to accomplish that--not something anyone can work up in a morning like BO.

  64. Geek is definitely not chic, but popular by aprenot · · Score: 1

    I not the geekiest guy, but I am pretty damn close. I have been writing software since i was 10 years old, and doing evertyhing from assembler to basic. I can talk protocols, architecture, and best practices. I always have some kind of book with me related to software and computers. However, this does not impress anyone. Nobody cares if you know how a computer works, or what registers and opcodes are - unless there computer breaks.

    However, geeks have definitely come into the spotlight in the past 6 or 7 years. Geeks are getting attention in TV shows, as another poster already pointed out, like in CSI, House, and Mythbusters (not so sure how many non-geeks watch Mythbusters though). Geeks do seem to get a certain amount of respect though - but usually from co-workers and other more intelligent people. Have you noticed the number of people that claim to be hackers, and brag to their friends about how they secretly downloaded movies by hacking through mainframes and evading the man (read "used Kazaa")? These people want the respect and admiration that is given to those that truely *can do*.

    Being a geek does not mean that you have to be socially inept, pale, and skinny (or way overweight). I go out frequently, date lots of beautiful women, and hit the gym 3-4 times a week. Being a geek is about capability and interest. The capability to solve complex problems and the interest to discover them in the first place. The capability to discuss intricate systems with a high level of comprehension and understanding.

    Being a geek is most definitely *not* owning toys (iPods, Media Center PCs, etc), pocket protectors, bad hygiene, or even caffeine. And many people like to throw in that gamers are geeks. While gamers can be geeks, many gamers can't even begin to tell you about the inner workings of a PC, or even their beloved PS2/XBox/Gamecube.

    And for those of you who identify yourselves as geeks, this does not mean that you can't shower everyday, have to drink so much caffeine that you have a heart murmor, or hang out in computer stores. I mean for crying out loud, take a shower!!

    Aa

    1. Re:Geek is definitely not chic, but popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      geek out - slang term for punding, esp. under the influence of amphetamines.

      punding - "human activity characterized by compulsive fascination with and performance of repetitive, mechanical tasks, such as assembling and disassembling, collecting, or sorting household objects. People engaging in punding find engaging in such activities comforting, even when it serves no purpose, and generally find it very frustrating to be diverted from them."

      No mention of intelligence or aptitude. But it does imply being so singleminded that you even forget to sleep (hence all the caffine to keep you awake the day after).

      QED - You are not a geek. Go back to your dating and working out. Leave the OCD behavior to the professionals

  65. Re:The association... I don't like IT.. so bite me by Pop69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sacrificed a chicken and chanted a bit to get a server restarted once, does that count as being a geek ?

  66. beware by bobamu · · Score: 1

    of geeks baring .gifs

  67. This is stupid. by TehDagda · · Score: 1

    This article and thread is just so much E! T.V. drivel. I can't believe that this entire thread has been about defining two (until now apparently) slanderous names (among hundreds) given to the socially inept by immature children in order to boost their own egos back in fucking high school (for those of you still in high/middle/elementary school, you are hereby exempt from my rant). Geek and nerd are/were derogatory terms. Made up names. Childish one-upmanship transmogrified here into personal ego-boosting. Anyone who buys into the 'Nerds and geeks are two different things' bs is a fucking tard for giving it a second thought in the first place. It's just name calling. Weather main-stream culture shifts their meanings from the negative to the positive is irrelevant. They're made up words and you're all juvenile for entertaining this discussion in the first place. Get over yourselves.

  68. Easy Answer: They Are Overcompensating by MCTFB · · Score: 1

    for having a small wang or else just a low sense of self-esteem. Real men don't need BMW's, McMansions, and other superficial crap to get laid and more importantly be happy. I see this all the time in my profession and the sad thing is these guys would be a lot more happy if they saved their money and didn't live beyond their means and invested that money in some weights to lift at home (geeks tend to be introverts which means they are gym averse), maybe a decent multivitamin, and some good healthy food.

    A lot of geeks spend zero time on taking care of themselves and either look like Skeletor at one extreme or else Chris Farley at the other extreme, yet they parade their money around like women should be attracted to them like flies are to a dung heap. The sad thing is women are attracted to their money, and when they get suckered into marrying and find out a year or two later that their wife now has a bad boy boyfriend on the side, while the divorce papers are in the mail, they scratch their heads and wonder how it could happen to them.

    Just because you are involved in technology, does not give you license to be a weakling because you think the size of your brain is the only thing that counts. In reality, it helps to cover all the bases which means not being lazy with your health or your social skills. Too many geeks spend zero time in their 20's improving their social skills with both men and women, and then when they finally get enough money, they wonder why everyone is still laughing at them.

    Most of these "geeks" are good guys and they mistakenly follow the celebrity culture like many superficial women do and think that they need to be "ghetto fabulous" or "metrosexual" for people, and especially women to take interest in them or at the very least respect them. Maybe these "geeks" had shitty male role models when they were growing up, or maybe their dad was a helpless geek, but when I talk to a lot of my peers about how the world really works, they just seem dumbfounded and immune to change.

    If god could take Chuck Norris and cut him up into little pieces and put a little piece of him in every geek guy out there, then the world would be a much better place. Until that happens, you are going to have geeks earning 100K a year and spending the money like they are millionaires, and then when their job gets outsourced and they are broke they will come here on Slashdot and whine about how bad their life sucks, when they should of just been a little more frugal and conservative with their money when the going was good.

    1. Re:Easy Answer: They Are Overcompensating by ksheff · · Score: 1
      Skeletor? I don't think you watched the same cartoons as I did. Other than the blue skin and no flesh on his skull, Skeletor looked like a body builder.

      I agree on the social skills part. The few women that I've gone out with, only did so because I was picking up the tab (from a movie date "oh crap..there's some people from my church..uh..if they ask, I'm not here with you, you're just some guy that happened to walk in from the parking lot at the same time" to ex-wife "I never really loved you, I just got tired of using you"). So, now I've become the equivalent of a monk with a paid off car, no credit cards, and the sole person responsible for my finances (for better or worse).

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  69. Insulting is what it is. by Bezben · · Score: 1

    In my mind, a geek is someone who plays with technology (exluding gaming console and the like). Someone who given a gadget can figure out what it does and how it works and have fun in the process. Basically, if you need the manual, you're not a geek.

    Now nerd, that is someone who argues about linux vs windows and the like.

  70. Students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a student on a non-tech course (Latin American studies), I've noticed that my comrades jump at any opportunity to call themselves geeks. It's not usually related to computers - for example, "I'm such a geek!" after explaining the library's archive system. Aside from this, they profess no technical knowledge, and despite being students, and therefore pro-being-clever, are still doing the fashionably computer-illiterate act.

    Away from university, this is even more extreme. People are still openly hostile to technology, and most have some whine story about being forced into some tech upgrade at work and the terrible consequences, which they eagerly repeat at all opportunities.
    So, an affinity for computers is no longer social suicide. And Apple did a good job of marketting the iPod by not playing up its tech side, instead focussing as usual on "lifestyle" and silhouettes of dancers.

    I see articles like this as the start of an avalanche of mass-media attempts to market people like us as a cool subculture. Apple and IBM are analagous to the waters receding (yes, this is some sort of avalanche-tsunami combo. Eat it bitches).

  71. Stop being prejudice to Bill Gates/Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Love and use Linux/Unix as being an admin a fairly decent company. And I do user Microsoft Windows. I dont know why people one way or the other tend to hate Microsoft and Bill Gates. Its by Virtue of Microsft and Bill Gates that people who know nothing about computers are using computers. I dont know why people here on slashdot tend to divert from topic and start bashing MS/Bill Gates.
    Richard Stallman
    Bill Gates
    Linus Torvalds
    are one of the most respectable hackers of their time. If Bill Gates has a different attitude towards money or business that doesnt puts him in a situation where we can call him technically challenged or some one who doesnt deserver respect in IT/Computer Science by any means. I totlaly believe "Those who don;t understand unix/linux are condemned to rewrite it poorly" but my mother wont be emailing me if there were no windows. There are issues with Microsft business model and sofware security but come on this post wasnt about it!
    and yes Geek is a person who uses technolody in a way it wasnt intended to be used and nerd thinks in they ways that are unconvetional but elegant and itroduce break throughs in science. So nerds are closer to science(theory) while geeks are closer to technology(application).

  72. Music? by Da+Zeg · · Score: 1

    I am a CS student and will admit to being a bit geeky. What you will notice is that most groups of like people in society (well when growing up anyway) seem to define themselves/ be defined by what they listen to. Can geeks be defined in this way?

  73. Chic?!? They really mean "chick" by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

    A recent survey by the Sci-Fi channel discovered that an increasing number of women could be included in the ranks of a new demographic it nick-named "New Geek". The research revealed that a third of the UK's total 6.9 million geeks were actually female. "Whereas once geeks were seen as solitary, embarrassing and uncool, the statistics show that New Geek is chic, popular and hugely influential," the researchers claimed.

    So, it's now more common and more cool to be a geek simply because there are more *women* getting into technology.... As a woman, I find that characterization stupid.

  74. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: How do you tell if a Russian computer geek likes you?

    A: His shoes look at you while he is talking.

    http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71358&ci d=6647090

  75. I think Someone's Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many of you have already said, material wealth has nothing to do with being a "geek", unless you're a banking geek, a la fictional TV personality Alex Keaton. The author is getting pop culture confused with the real thing. It happens all the time. The entertainment industry is built up this. The clothes, the attitude, the gadgets... it's all an act to emulate a particular style, but it's shallow. The fashion and entertainment industries are built on the practices of making people uncomfortable with their appearance and unhappy with what they own. These "New Geeks" are no more geeks than...

    ...shaggy-haired, earth-tone-colored, worn-out-clothes-wearing middle-class kids were grunge rockers in the 90s...

    ...baggy-pantsed, boat-shoe wearing preppies were R&B rappers in the late 80s...

    ...bearded, long-haired, and stoned-out rich college-kids were hippies in the 60s...

    Every generations got 'em: Trend whores. Sorry, but I didn't choose to be a geek, and I'm not emulating anyone. This is the way I am. I felt the pressure to conform when I was younger, but I was too geeky to do it right, and that just made me more of an outsider. Now I'm older and I don't care. I conduct myself and dress the way I feel comfortable. I don't care how anyone else styles their hair, chooses to dress, or what gadgets they buy.

    I've been tinkering with electronics and computers since I was eight or so. That doesn't automatically make me like every computerized gadget out there, so I dislike that stereo-type. I have to stand there and make a forced smile when people ask me about these worthless trinkets, many of which I hate:

    "Home theater" and associated gadgetry - I'm starting to hate DVD players because they've been turned into MPAA nag-ware devices. I had an expensive home-theater set-up, but I sold off all the components because it was impractical, and the 5 remotes with 50,000 molecule-sized buttons apparently weren't my cup of tea. I realized that building speaker enclosures using "exotic" designs was the more enjoyable activity. Then there was a feature war that ruined the quality and usability of the equipment in much the same way it ruined PDAs, mobile phones and digital cameras. That was the final nail in the coffin for me. PC "home theater" is even worse. I don't see the point of owning a 7-channel sound card. If I ever get into it again, I'll start by building my own single-channel amps and speaker enclosures.

    PDAs and other hand-held gadgets - I can't stand PDAs because they're worthless; I've memorized all the important telephone numbers and people I need to know, and I can recall immediately the couple-dozen passwords I need to get things done. My notepad doesn't need batteries, and always records what I write, correctly, and on the first try. I hate mobile phones, because they're overly-complicated, noise-y and unreliable. It may take 22 hours for an important voice-mail message to get to me, but hey, those games work every time. As you can imagine, I'm personally offended by the existence of combination PDA-phone-camera devices.

    Mobile phones - The CB of 21st century. Obnoxious little devices that suck the money out of people's wallets, while doing their supposed primary function worse than the previous generation of devices. I can never figure out how these people can afford 7000-minute plans for everyone in the family and a new phone every six months. Give me a simple device that does SIP so I can hack it to talk to my PBX, and then I'll be interested.

    Cheap digital cameras, PC cameras - Remember this fad? Yeah, those are all in a landfill now. What a waste, but sorry, the definition of "New Geek" has changed, and you need an iPod now. Like anyone wants to see my ugly mug.

    Modern amateur radio equipment - The hobby mainly consists of buying outrageously expensive, feature-packed, Japanese-built equipment and yakking 'til you drop on the maximum legal PEP level over a pre-fab antenna. Hams are much w

  76. mmmmm no it's not by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Your value system may be changing with age but:
    Kids are still punished for their desire to learn in school
    Jocks are still lauded throughout society, not just high school

    BUT as we age, those things that were derided early on (book l'arnin', etc) allow "us geeks" to rise up much farther than the fat-head jock wrestlers who had their moments of glory in high school.

    Geeks peak later.
    And for grins, I'm posting the lyrics to Friends Forever by the Old 97s because it's a fantastic nod to the outcasts in high school. (of which, by geek definition, 95% of us were such)

    Friends Forever
    I was a debater
    Was not a stoner nor an inline skater
    Was not a player nor a player hater
    I was just a bookworm on a respirator
    Who's to say that's wrong

    I was in the chess club
    Didn't have a swimming pool much less a true love
    Didn't have a dalliance much less a hot tub
    I was just a brain whose brain never let up
    Who's to say that's wrong

    The twelve years after five
    Are years we're lucky to survive
    Hang in there friends forever
    In memory far away
    Hang in there friends forever
    In memory far away

    Went out for the football team
    Found out the hard way that you can't live your Dad's dream
    Had pretty thin skin to be in the machine
    Then I found a guitar and the rest's a fanzine
    Who's to say that's wrong

    The moral of the song
    Is that the high school kids are wrong
    You know they have been all along
    Come graduation day you'll be gone
    Hang in there friends forever
    In memory far away
    (end)

    Cheers, bitches. :)

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  77. If "geek is in"... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...then why can't most male geeks get dates?

    *watches iron-clad karma melt into hot slag*

  78. Someone told me... by -1-Lone_Eagle · · Score: 1

    Isn't the true metric of geekiness in direct correlation to you're slashdot user reID Number? Not once in that article did they mention that! If you ever want to judge a nerd, ask them for thier slahdot number. Posers Beware! (and no, I am NOT as geeky as you are)

  79. Geek-improvement by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

    It always feels good to see the bastard that made your life so difficult for months in a row because you are a "geek" having to serve you your salmonfilet in your favorite fancy restaurant.

    Or the "cool guys of the class" that apparently got addicted to amphetamines and are now walking zombies without a job or any prospects of finding one soon.

    Sorry if this sounds sadistic, but sometimes...

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
  80. The bazaar? by extintor · · Score: 1

    Newsflash, Eric Raymond wrote "The Cathedral and the bazaar"

  81. Jargon Files by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/G/geek.html I cant belive no one have mentioned the Jargon files.

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
  82. Re:First Post? by mpitcavage · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, I didn't even read the article. Slashdot is my homepage one one of my browsers, and when it came up, I noticed the latest story had no "Read More" line following the article (which means it was posted only seconds before). So after 10 years of reading Slashdot, I thought A new article, and nobody noticed yet! This may be my best chance ever!.

    The beautiful irony that resulted from my positive karma is that I pulled the ultimate geek stunt on this particular article.

    I'll tell you, the cosmic and real 100 karma points of my first and probably only successful first post far outweighs the slashdot negative karma of "troll"

    I also learned that you have to wait between clicking "reply" and clicking "submit", when that happened, my hopes were almost dashed.

    Now all I have to do is post every article I see on slashdot back to Slashdot so Zonk can post my first article.

  83. The Essence of Geek, by MSenhanced · · Score: 1

    "ZDNet has a feature on The Essence of Geek,..."

    What? Is this some kind of new cologne by Richard Stallman, as he shakes his hippy hair/beard from side to side in the commercial as it mimicks those herbial essense ones for women's shampoo? Seriously!

    "Did someone say...purge?"

    --
    I write sig's like I know what I'm talking about.
  84. New trends.... by In+Fraudem+Legis · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the terms "geek", "whitehat" and "hacker" are used to describe the new trends, eg. using techonology and so on, but they seem to lack the skills and knowledge. Being a true geek and/or a hacker means you can think outside the box and reverse engineer things + you don't brag about your real skills and you walk in the shadows.

    --
    Per Aspera Ad Astra.