honey is one of the most important substances on the planet. As are the bees involved. It would do well to avoid grocery store honey whenever possible.
I have tons of problems with IE. Lack of standards compliance sums up all of them. Continued lack of standards compliance is why it needs to die. They are the cause of the problem, and not a solution.
This reflects directly on the NYT, and if they don't hold their own journalists accountable for doing a bad job then it reflects directly on the NYT. Then again, this isn't the first time they've done a horrible job.
You do hold your own accountable, else your quality control becomes nonexistent. That is indeed why quality control aka editors are supposed to exist.
At what point do facts somehow become less convincing than John Broder's fabrication? Facts should be cut and dry, end of the day. If John is on one "side" and Musk is somehow on another, then you are simply misrepresenting "sides" to the story that don't exist. The opposite of facts is not another side to a story, it's called bullshit, and appropriately so. NYT doesn't get an all clear to do that any more than Faux news.
yeah? Let me know how that fairsearch campaign is working out for Microsoft. You know, google is evil blah blah.
Also remind me how people respond to hotmail selling your information to anyone and everyone, including signing you up for spam mail. While google does do advertising, they don't sign you up for product spam.
The point is, this study has zero correlation with REALITY. It's not about literacy, and it's not about GDP. None of these have any direct correlation to malware. Also, in many countries Windows is considered malware - so naturally they're labeled having a higher malware rate.
Does this reflect on anything realistic, and/or should this even be discussed? No, because it's not relevant to anything.
exactly. the compromises for all the network bandwidth costs are enormous. I don't think people realize that if you really wanted a quality onlive-equivalent experience it's probably going to be $50+ a month, which could easily translate to a high end computer every 2 years.
facebook has said they endorse apple's "complete control" model. So anyone who trusts facebook after that, is making a big mistake - not one they weren't already warned of.
Just like viruses, it's going to get a lot worse before people start figuring out what to do about it and what not to do. It's still in the "only the technical people who get it are saying stop using it" category.
statutory damages are easily fought off by asking for a trial. This has been the fun/issue of all of the settlement shakedowns to exist currently. Get a letter? get a lawyer and immediately lawyer up, and watch them try to run away. refuse to settle, and go from there.
While MAFIAA may be incredibly stupid, don't think their finance people are as stupid. It's not hard for them to figure out if it's not worth the money.
Have you ever had significant repercussions from debunking what is essentially garbage? Have people ever actually threatened you for supposedly crushing any livelihoods, which were then based on fraud?
Slashdot Mirror
anything is in that category.
For the time being however, there is no such stroke of the pen. It's also a whole hell of a lot harder to restrict a digital currency.
honey is one of the most important substances on the planet. As are the bees involved. It would do well to avoid grocery store honey whenever possible.
I have tons of problems with IE. Lack of standards compliance sums up all of them. Continued lack of standards compliance is why it needs to die. They are the cause of the problem, and not a solution.
Absolutely and totally incorrect.
This reflects directly on the NYT, and if they don't hold their own journalists accountable for doing a bad job then it reflects directly on the NYT. Then again, this isn't the first time they've done a horrible job.
You do hold your own accountable, else your quality control becomes nonexistent. That is indeed why quality control aka editors are supposed to exist.
At what point do facts somehow become less convincing than John Broder's fabrication? Facts should be cut and dry, end of the day. If John is on one "side" and Musk is somehow on another, then you are simply misrepresenting "sides" to the story that don't exist. The opposite of facts is not another side to a story, it's called bullshit, and appropriately so. NYT doesn't get an all clear to do that any more than Faux news.
Good thing we have penny arcade to sum up Broder:
http://art.penny-arcade.com/photos/i-5xVV2tB/0/950x10000/i-5xVV2tB-950x10000.jpg
actually, I'd say it's cheaper to buy a VPN package.
you know why they call it a beverage? it's liquid you can drink.
That doesn't mean you should. In fact, poison distilled in water is a beverage, and it's probably better for you than any processed food or drink.
usually on linux servers people try to use consoles; having a browser on a server is simply a security risk.
What the heck are YOU thinking?
nothing of what you said has anything to do with BSD. BSD isn't about being able to run whatever you want. That's GPL.
which is trumped by companies having a retention policy of 90 days - so if ediscovery doesn't start early enough, there's no evidence.
yeah? Let me know how that fairsearch campaign is working out for Microsoft. You know, google is evil blah blah.
Also remind me how people respond to hotmail selling your information to anyone and everyone, including signing you up for spam mail. While google does do advertising, they don't sign you up for product spam.
What kind of argument is that?
The point is, this study has zero correlation with REALITY. It's not about literacy, and it's not about GDP. None of these have any direct correlation to malware. Also, in many countries Windows is considered malware - so naturally they're labeled having a higher malware rate.
Does this reflect on anything realistic, and/or should this even be discussed? No, because it's not relevant to anything.
exactly. the compromises for all the network bandwidth costs are enormous. I don't think people realize that if you really wanted a quality onlive-equivalent experience it's probably going to be $50+ a month, which could easily translate to a high end computer every 2 years.
actually they're constrained by relevance - mostly a lack of.
amount of things this has to do with freedom in correlation to IOS or android = zero.
please leave slashdot.
if this goes through, I'd be happy to double or even consider tripling that.
reality says it never will, though. Hell, groklaw offered to store the documents themselves.
facebook has said they endorse apple's "complete control" model. So anyone who trusts facebook after that, is making a big mistake - not one they weren't already warned of.
Just like viruses, it's going to get a lot worse before people start figuring out what to do about it and what not to do. It's still in the "only the technical people who get it are saying stop using it" category.
statutory damages are easily fought off by asking for a trial. This has been the fun/issue of all of the settlement shakedowns to exist currently. Get a letter? get a lawyer and immediately lawyer up, and watch them try to run away. refuse to settle, and go from there.
these private enterprises are basically running under the auspices of our government, which is exactly what I meant.
not true even remotely.
While MAFIAA may be incredibly stupid, don't think their finance people are as stupid. It's not hard for them to figure out if it's not worth the money.
the also unsurprising factor is that this is happening in China, where the same responses for how to prevent this have been sent every week:
download things from official trusted sources only.
150 times?
incredibly easy, actually. Especially if you're the US government's copyright stasi.
not really.
it'll go through court, but it's impossible to pin on the individual unless they settle, preventing a court case.
Or get a router that can isolate the private network from public, which would also do the same.
actually, a lot of countries don't even allow plea deals because it's so corrupt.
So yeah, don't assume that plea deals are to the benefit of the defendant.
Have you ever had significant repercussions from debunking what is essentially garbage? Have people ever actually threatened you for supposedly crushing any livelihoods, which were then based on fraud?