100% wrong. Read what this man did and then ask yourself how we've set up a society that let him get to that point, and we're not just talking about guns.
We're talking about the behaviors that enabled things to get to this point. Why have we created a society where we have such corruption that people are choosing to resort to robbery, for example?
GPL doesn't restrict people from using the software any way they want. It restricts them from preventing anyone else from using the software any way they want.
Which matters - let me know how trying to run Apple on non-apple hardware without paying for a license goes, in comparison to a GPL'd OS.
You have the right idea, but your injury costs, deaths, and sensor costs are both wrong and based on the summary. If you RTFA it's 200+ deaths a year and 15 thousand injuries (not 1100), so we're talking almost $550M right there based on your back of a napkin numbers.
Even the government may be stereotyped as stupid but they are surely able to do this kind of cost/benefit analysis better than a random anon post.
It's more simple than that. Another case of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B... aka bad posts from a bad author who consistently posts complete fucking garbage.
This is hilarious. You don't have to be born powerful to be in those situations. In fact, it's likely the small fry at companies who are targeted. Other NSA ops seem to confirm this. You're just confirming that you would be a target.
Oh hey, maybe there's a lot of details you could be missing before you make up something like this. You know, like "what you're using" and "Where you make this shit up"?
You can access google drive from any browser, unless you plan on running IE6.
Anything refused under that angle is basically denial of working with the FOIA process, basically using "national security" as an excuse to get out of everything via the loophole as designed.
That is exactly a lack of transparency, not an excuse for it.
Them being ethnically russian has absolutely zero bearing on intentionally driving up tensions between people in a single region, as you note yourself in the second sentence. This isn't an "ethnic cleansing" like Armenia. Just as there are peaceful middle eastern folk who live freely in Israel, there are peaceful Russians who live freely in Ukraine.
I don't know how someone in such a position can't even pronounce Kiev properly though, that's pretty fucking sad from a cultural perspective. That part of things (and US involvement in general) is indeed a fucking insult/joke. However, I certainly wouldn't be able to tell you what the right answer/response is here.
Maybe you're still missing the "being in public means being in public" part? You don't get to choose when that's somehow no longer true based on your own non-legal definition when you're still in public.
Let me tell you outright, you are explicitly wrong. Paparazzi exist to make a profit off public photos without people's permission. There is no such right or law that proves otherwise.
Your ad-hominem issues with Stallman have no bearing on his academic achievements and the work he has done for F/"LOSS", so your comment loses relevance entirely.
Just because the man sticks up for his values which (when people aren't taking low hanging fruit and complaining about his physical behavior) happen to be factually correct, doesn't mean that he's too divisive. It means the FOSS community people are compromising their values and giving in to the opposite of their values.
Slashdot Mirror
Or just listen to music and only check your phone at red lights. It's not that hard, at least to me?
Then again self driving cars may fix this some day.
100% wrong. Read what this man did and then ask yourself how we've set up a society that let him get to that point, and we're not just talking about guns.
We're talking about the behaviors that enabled things to get to this point. Why have we created a society where we have such corruption that people are choosing to resort to robbery, for example?
Not true.
GPL doesn't restrict people from using the software any way they want. It restricts them from preventing anyone else from using the software any way they want.
Which matters - let me know how trying to run Apple on non-apple hardware without paying for a license goes, in comparison to a GPL'd OS.
Resignation is a resignation. There isn't a discussion over how forced it was/wasn't, if it's a resignation.
No, it's not hard to know.
It's a literal "Fuck you", just without using words.
You have the right idea, but your injury costs, deaths, and sensor costs are both wrong and based on the summary. If you RTFA it's 200+ deaths a year and 15 thousand injuries (not 1100), so we're talking almost $550M right there based on your back of a napkin numbers.
Even the government may be stereotyped as stupid but they are surely able to do this kind of cost/benefit analysis better than a random anon post.
Zeus has 99.97% uptime in our environment.
It's more simple than that. Another case of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B... aka bad posts from a bad author who consistently posts complete fucking garbage.
This is hilarious. You don't have to be born powerful to be in those situations. In fact, it's likely the small fry at companies who are targeted. Other NSA ops seem to confirm this. You're just confirming that you would be a target.
See, ain't this shit grand?
Please. This was debunked already. http://www.techdirt.com/articl...
What I find is hilarious is that "being forced to comply" is considered "assisting".
Apparently when your only choice is jail or compliance, somehow you're assisting in the process.
Oh hey, maybe there's a lot of details you could be missing before you make up something like this. You know, like "what you're using" and "Where you make this shit up"?
You can access google drive from any browser, unless you plan on running IE6.
Anything refused under that angle is basically denial of working with the FOIA process, basically using "national security" as an excuse to get out of everything via the loophole as designed.
That is exactly a lack of transparency, not an excuse for it.
Them being ethnically russian has absolutely zero bearing on intentionally driving up tensions between people in a single region, as you note yourself in the second sentence. This isn't an "ethnic cleansing" like Armenia. Just as there are peaceful middle eastern folk who live freely in Israel, there are peaceful Russians who live freely in Ukraine.
I don't know how someone in such a position can't even pronounce Kiev properly though, that's pretty fucking sad from a cultural perspective. That part of things (and US involvement in general) is indeed a fucking insult/joke. However, I certainly wouldn't be able to tell you what the right answer/response is here.
"Some part of Crimea wants them there"?
You mean the part that is 100% false and this has been shown via evidence?
http://news.slashdot.org/story...
What makes you think they would?
This is all posturing and nothing more. It's almost all brought upon by Russia.
You have this backwards. There is no right you have to privacy from public photos. Do show me where you suppose one exists.
Maybe you're still missing the "being in public means being in public" part? You don't get to choose when that's somehow no longer true based on your own non-legal definition when you're still in public.
Factually incorrect.
Let me tell you outright, you are explicitly wrong. Paparazzi exist to make a profit off public photos without people's permission. There is no such right or law that proves otherwise.
Yep. There are other countries that require this and it becomes quite a problem in general. I believe france may be one of them?
Requiring permission makes it impossible to exercise free speech and/or take photos, basically.
Actually, don't forget - if there's a killswitch on your phone, then the people up top would also have it.
It's not that they are or aren't free (BSD), is that the freedom can be removed.
This is a logical impossibility.
By your comment, either there is infighting (by agreeing with the post I had replied to), or I'm causing infighting (by disagreeing).
Your ad-hominem issues with Stallman have no bearing on his academic achievements and the work he has done for F/"LOSS", so your comment loses relevance entirely.
Just because the man sticks up for his values which (when people aren't taking low hanging fruit and complaining about his physical behavior) happen to be factually correct, doesn't mean that he's too divisive. It means the FOSS community people are compromising their values and giving in to the opposite of their values.
Until you are charged, you are not charged. There is no exception.