Really? What part of libel is there with claiming someone is a pedophile. Luckyo is a pedophile! That's not illegal. The latter is absolutely legal if it's an opinion. Also where's the proof of damages?
You can claim the word is illegal, but you'd be laughed out of court in an instant. Get your shit straight.
these companies are already making ARM products, it's just that they'll be making them for the next windows version when it comes out. So this is a change of nothing.
This has to do with freedom of speech and the internet. It has to do with how facebook ties into that and absolutely ties into slashdot. These kind of things do impact network admins, who wouldn't need excessive filtering (they'd still need porn/malware but not a controversial filter) if it wasn't for shit like what the school is doing.
If the teacher loses their job, that's the school doing a horrible job and opening themselves to lawsuits. Hear of something bad about your employees? Is it worth investigating? If so, do so. If not, welcome to a new lawsuit. If a teacher's home gets firebombed, as extreme and generally unlikely that it is, it's unfortunate. But some people are stupid enough to do that over anything, let alone fake pedophilia claims.
It doesn't matter about where oil prices go, because if we continue to have horrifically bad patent law, patents will still be used to stifle innovation and new markets, including alternative energy solutions.
Nobody has a problem with copying, not even google. The problem is that they aren't even *improving* anything! If people want copied google search results they will just use google.
You know what words aren't mentioned when a competitor looks for faults with it's competition and goes immediately public? The most true words are never spoken:
Neutral Third Party.
I've almost never seen what you are referring to ever happen in a legitimate way. This is like a MS funded study being pro MS. Really?
Is this another idiotic moment where people don't realize that it's easier for police to find crime when you know it's on craigslist? Or is this another AG grandstanding moment?
I was wondering where the search warrant was, even? I don't hear anything about evidence, just sony strongarming and getting police to do sony's job for them while bypassing the legal system.
If the US gov't declares him an enemy combatant, or terrorist, they can detain him indefinitely without ever charging him with anything, essentially giving him a death sentence in prison (since living in gitmo isn't known for it's long survival rates).
So while that's true if he's under US law, don't think for even an 1/8th of a second that this would run through traditional US courts. This has been made impossible to challenge basically because of how they've set up enemy combatant/terrorist.
Also, this isn't even a criminal punishment in sweden with 1yr of jailtime, which is a requirement of extradition.
Doesn't mean that their competitors wouldn't want to refer to google as dead or nonexistent.
In the meantime, google has had it's screwups, and had it's successes, and is doing far better than it's competitors because competition is fucking lazy and doing a bad job. Surprise? Not really.
Only an idiot would actually buy a Bluray film. Get a 1080P tv and it'll probably do 1080P through a PC, which is higher quality, means you can download the movies and never have to pay for a Bluray player/device. Buy your cables on monoprice and you're done.
Two party hasn't worked for us since Nixon, basically. Maybe even before that. I'm not enough of a history buff to be accurate, but basically regulatory capture and corporate capture fuck us over the most. I remember there being some act in the 70's or 80s that really made it about 100x worse, some law that was repealed, which had originally stated that corporations may not lobby towards getting laws passed.
It cracks me up that his argument is that they are in bed with the government. If he's worried about that, why isn't he going after the MPAA? RIAA? Microsoft? MS Shell companies? Corporations that are basically buying the government? Revolving circle (gov-> biz and vice versa) industries?
I doubt they can do that, but hey, who am I? I don't see value even on the Nokia sellout for Microsoft.
Neither do the shareholders, and thus the stock has tanked.
AMD is on the up because of value, but AMD being owned by dell would be the death of AMD. Dell isn't really an R&D focused company, to take on AMD (a company that requires R&D) would be a horrific incident, to say the least. This is like when bankers tried to take on Chrysler, and had no idea how to run a car business.
Kroft: The Pentagon said that they’ve gone through all of these documents and they found the names of 300 people. Assange: Well, that’s new public information to us. It’s possible that there are 300 names in the publically released Afghan material. We don’t pretend that that process is absolutely perfect. We did hold back one in five documents for extra harm minimization review and we also improved our process. So, when Iraq came around there was not even a single name in it.
when Congress asked the State Department to back up those statements, officials told them it really wasn't that big of a deal: "We were told (the impact of WikiLeaks revelations) was embarrassing but not damaging," said the official, who attended a briefing given in late 2010 by State Department officials.
Nokia could have played the smart move and catered to the entire market since they're not linked to anyone (aka innovation), instead they took a stupid decision and sided with a single company. Nobody cares that HTC makes android and windows phones, and HTC simply wins whenever either sell phones. Nokia could have done the same.
I can only question how much of this is related to Elop having worked for MS.
Hell, a nokia hardware iphone? That'd be quite interesting. Instead, Nokia win7phone? Horrid.
Slashdot Mirror
Really? What part of libel is there with claiming someone is a pedophile. Luckyo is a pedophile! That's not illegal. The latter is absolutely legal if it's an opinion. Also where's the proof of damages?
You can claim the word is illegal, but you'd be laughed out of court in an instant. Get your shit straight.
these companies are already making ARM products, it's just that they'll be making them for the next windows version when it comes out. So this is a change of nothing.
hint: it's not going to be called windows 8.
Are you that dense?
This has to do with freedom of speech and the internet. It has to do with how facebook ties into that and absolutely ties into slashdot. These kind of things do impact network admins, who wouldn't need excessive filtering (they'd still need porn/malware but not a controversial filter) if it wasn't for shit like what the school is doing.
If the teacher loses their job, that's the school doing a horrible job and opening themselves to lawsuits. Hear of something bad about your employees? Is it worth investigating? If so, do so. If not, welcome to a new lawsuit. If a teacher's home gets firebombed, as extreme and generally unlikely that it is, it's unfortunate. But some people are stupid enough to do that over anything, let alone fake pedophilia claims.
as mentioned, nothing you mention isn't already in google, so how is this a "strength for bing"?
you need to wake up to reality.
It doesn't matter about where oil prices go, because if we continue to have horrifically bad patent law, patents will still be used to stifle innovation and new markets, including alternative energy solutions.
Nobody has a problem with copying, not even google. The problem is that they aren't even *improving* anything! If people want copied google search results they will just use google.
I hope your post gets modded insightful.
120% of studies that are designed to be misleading end up with 250% bogus numbers.
You know what words aren't mentioned when a competitor looks for faults with it's competition and goes immediately public? The most true words are never spoken:
Neutral Third Party.
I've almost never seen what you are referring to ever happen in a legitimate way. This is like a MS funded study being pro MS. Really?
Is this another idiotic moment where people don't realize that it's easier for police to find crime when you know it's on craigslist? Or is this another AG grandstanding moment?
About how many prisoners have been released from gitmo, and/or had a real trial?
Hint: less than 1, whole numbers only.
You don't have to kill someone to make them effectively nullified from existence. All it takes is a life sentence without parole.
I was wondering where the search warrant was, even? I don't hear anything about evidence, just sony strongarming and getting police to do sony's job for them while bypassing the legal system.
If the US gov't declares him an enemy combatant, or terrorist, they can detain him indefinitely without ever charging him with anything, essentially giving him a death sentence in prison (since living in gitmo isn't known for it's long survival rates).
So while that's true if he's under US law, don't think for even an 1/8th of a second that this would run through traditional US courts. This has been made impossible to challenge basically because of how they've set up enemy combatant/terrorist.
Also, this isn't even a criminal punishment in sweden with 1yr of jailtime, which is a requirement of extradition.
Doesn't mean that their competitors wouldn't want to refer to google as dead or nonexistent.
In the meantime, google has had it's screwups, and had it's successes, and is doing far better than it's competitors because competition is fucking lazy and doing a bad job. Surprise? Not really.
No, the reason it is cropping up is because the US is doing it. Once a leading country does, everyone else points at them as the example.
Why would you need to do VDPAU? Surely there are other ways? I'm not as knowledgeable on linux/unix codecs as I used to be.
Only an idiot would actually buy a Bluray film. Get a 1080P tv and it'll probably do 1080P through a PC, which is higher quality, means you can download the movies and never have to pay for a Bluray player/device. Buy your cables on monoprice and you're done.
Two party hasn't worked for us since Nixon, basically. Maybe even before that. I'm not enough of a history buff to be accurate, but basically regulatory capture and corporate capture fuck us over the most. I remember there being some act in the 70's or 80s that really made it about 100x worse, some law that was repealed, which had originally stated that corporations may not lobby towards getting laws passed.
It cracks me up that his argument is that they are in bed with the government. If he's worried about that, why isn't he going after the MPAA? RIAA? Microsoft? MS Shell companies? Corporations that are basically buying the government? Revolving circle (gov-> biz and vice versa) industries?
What a joke.
I doubt they can do that, but hey, who am I? I don't see value even on the Nokia sellout for Microsoft.
Neither do the shareholders, and thus the stock has tanked.
AMD is on the up because of value, but AMD being owned by dell would be the death of AMD. Dell isn't really an R&D focused company, to take on AMD (a company that requires R&D) would be a horrific incident, to say the least. This is like when bankers tried to take on Chrysler, and had no idea how to run a car business.
we already have a tax on economic growth. It's called patents.
go read the government's statement that this stuff doesn't harm shit and then try to tell me that keller's being factual.. They're focusing on "OMG assange is putting names on the documents" which is both a: a lie, and b: prevents the focus on the fact that it's been corporate pressure that has moved government's hand to attack wikileaks, who doesnt' damage shit and merely brings out true transparency.
Go read what Assange said himself instead of propaganda and what do you see? from the article:
Who said wikileaks hastily and carelesly released anythng?
1: you cannot redact everything, or it's not a document. That's worse than a FOIA redaction, in which case people can't figure out a goddamn thing.
2: the only people they allow to be identified are the tyrants who should be identified, not anyone else. Military has already admitted that just about nobody has been harmed from wikileaks releases, if you'd take your head out of your ass and read.
From the second article:
so who are they causing to die, exactly?
where was the part of actually interviewing assange, eh?
he's been interviewed before and says that he protects people on this stuff. way to propaganda that shit.
Yep.
Nokia could have played the smart move and catered to the entire market since they're not linked to anyone (aka innovation), instead they took a stupid decision and sided with a single company. Nobody cares that HTC makes android and windows phones, and HTC simply wins whenever either sell phones. Nokia could have done the same.
I can only question how much of this is related to Elop having worked for MS.
Hell, a nokia hardware iphone? That'd be quite interesting. Instead, Nokia win7phone? Horrid.