Slashdot Mirror


Two Huge Holes In the Sun Spotted

An anonymous reader writes "Japanese scientists have spotted two huge holes on the sun's magnetic field, and it appears there is some reason to be concerned about. The holes, called coronal holes, are gateways for solar material and gas to spill out into space, according to space.com. The gaps in the sun's magnetic field make a hole through its atmosphere, letting gas out, NASA has said."

204 comments

  1. NASA link by sustik · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:NASA link by bmo · · Score: 1

      This Solar Dynamics Observatory image of the Sun taken on January 10 in extreme ultraviolet light captures a dark coronal hole just about at sun center. Coronal holes are areas of the Sun's surface that are the source of open magnetic field lines that head way out into space. They are also the source regions of the fast solar wind, which is characterized by a relatively steady speed of approximately 800 km/s (about 1.8 million mph). As the sun continues to rotate, the high speed solar wind particles blowing from this hole will likely reach Earth in a few days and may spark some auroral activity.

      The original article is not very informative at all. This, however, means that some people will get to see some lights. Cool. But coronal holes are far from rare.

    2. Re:NASA link by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Look at the date of the article, and the time estimate they give for the gas stream hitting earth. It means that some people may have seen some lights.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:NASA link by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I thought this was about the solar flares headed our way. Sorry the only link I could find, the news is too new I guess.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    4. Re:NASA link by kenwd0elq · · Score: 2

      Try www.spaceweather.com.

    5. Re:NASA link by bmo · · Score: 1

      D'oh. I didn't even see that.

    6. Re:NASA link by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      ugh. that site is like a large pustule on the arse of the internet.

    7. Re:NASA link by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant.

      The one you've posted is dated Jan 11, 2011 ... the article discusses the Feb 13 flare.

    8. Re:NASA link by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 2

      So does that mean we are already dead?

    9. Re:NASA link by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      Actually when I posted it NASA had nothing on the flare, but they do now. spaceweather.com

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  2. So... by lolololol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is there reason to be "concerned"? It is an interesting find, but that solar gas won't do much to harm Earth.

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I've been a ham radio operator for a long time, and have seen this sort of thing occasionally.

      No, it won't directly harm us, but it could wreak havoc on the radio spectrum.

      Depending on what exactly happens, we hams may see some terrific "skip" conditions on the shortwave
      bands, or we may experience a near-complete wipe-out where nothing gets through, let alone bouncing
      off a layer in the upper atmosphere. It may also disrupt some satellite links depending on the position of
      the various satellites relative to the wave of incoming particles/stuff and which way the satellites are aimed
      towards their ground stations.

      Folks in higher latitudes may be treated to an incredible display of "Northern Lights" or "Southern Lights" as appropriate.
      Considering we're just now coming out of a minimum in the 11 year sunspot cycle, this is indeed an interesting event.

    2. Re:So... by skids · · Score: 0

      Because two huge holes appeared in this publication's bottom line, and they can only be sealed with ad exposure revenue! So click frantically my friend, click like a frightened idiot!

    3. Re:So... by mysidia · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why is there reason to be "concerned"? It is an interesting find, but that solar gas won't do much to harm Earth.

      The concern is that gas escape from our sun might actually burn out and go red giant in 5.4 billion years instead of 5.5 billion years, reducing the lifetime of earth by perhaps 200000000 years or so.

    4. Re:So... by avgjoe62 · · Score: 2

      There is absolutely no reason to be concerned - unless, of course, the sun eats a couple of Jupiter-sized bean burritos...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    5. Re:So... by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course we should be concerned. It's immediately obvious that these coronal holes are caused by driving gas-guzzling SUV's, the indiscriminate use of Vuvuzelas and of course Sharia law. I propose a new tax on all economic growth in order to solve this problem.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:So... by MBaldelli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is there reason to be "concerned"? It is an interesting find, but that solar gas won't do much to harm Earth.

      Having done a little scanning of this news from the source of the article, NASA, Space Weather, this is hardly rare and not the sign of an impending stellar apocalypse. From the less credible sources, the concerns that are sort of just below the surface is that the sun's going to lose it's fuel because of these holes in much the same manner as it was originally thought if we were to sent rockets into space would punch holes in the atmosphere of Earth causing all the air to funnel off into space.

      One would hope such wacky conspiracy theorists would've died off around the same time as it was determined driving in a car more than 25 MPH would cause our bones to turn to jelly, but it would appear that they're still around.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    7. Re:So... by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Why is there reason to be "concerned"? It is an interesting find, but that solar gas won't do much to harm Earth.

      Your missing the point. Its not that the gas will hit the earth. Its that the sun is like a giant balloon, and now it has a hole in it, that's letting the gas out.

      The the sun will be completely deflated within a year!!

      The sun worshipping mayans knew about this too, its clearly the 2012 apocalypse. I'm mean if you worshipped the sun like a god, why bother marking any dates on the calendar after the sun goes out.

    8. Re:So... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0

      Cool. Will you be able to talk to your father and solve the murder of your mother?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:So... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      we already have a tax on economic growth. It's called patents.

    10. Re:So... by Molt · · Score: 1

      It's still under warranty anyway.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    11. Re:So... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Sigh...someone didn't get or didn't like the "Frequency" reference.

      "we hams may see some terrific "skip" conditions on the shortwave
      bands"

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  3. Your toast - which way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah 2012 - thought the Mayans said Mother earth was going to laugh and reformat herself. Looks like Father Sun has a different choice for cooking us.

    1. Re:Your toast - which way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cosmic bukkake unleashed will be a pleasant experience for Mother Earth.

    2. Re:Your toast - which way? by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      Ah 2012 - thought the Mayans said Mother earth was going to laugh and reformat herself. Looks like Father Sun has a different choice for cooking us.

      Ah 2012 - thought the Mayans said Mother earth was going to laugh and reformat herself. Looks like Father Sun has a different choice for cooking us.

      Mayans never said anything about 2012 doomsday, they just have a calender that cycles every 1,872,000 days. It's like aliens believing the universe will explode because this primitive Western human tribes calender only goes up to the 31st of December and then suddenly.......ends......

    3. Re:Your toast - which way? by Stevecrox · · Score: 5, Informative

      I really hate this urban legend, read the wikipedia article on the Mayan Calender.

      Basically they had the Tzolk'in which provided a 260 day year (13 months of 20 days) which was used to plan ceremonies and events. Because that doesn't match up with the length of the year they developed the Haab which lasts 365 days this provided 18 months consisting of 20 days, with 5 "nameless" days.

      However neither of these calenders providing a way of keeping track of the year, so the mayans worked out the year by using the Tzolk'in and Haab calenders, since those dates reset every 52 years the Mayans called that a Calender Round.

      The Long Count was created so dates which occurred outside of the 52 year cycle could be stated, the end of the world myth exists because 1 Bakturn consists of 144,000 days. On December 21st 2012 this bakturn cycle ends, that doesn't mean the world will end to the Mayans the end of such a cycle is a time of celebration.

      In short the Mayan calender system is a giant overly complicated mess.

    4. Re:Your toast - which way? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Mayans never said anything about 2012 doomsday, they just have a calender that cycles every 1,872,000 days. It's like aliens believing the universe will explode because this primitive Western human tribes calender only goes up to the 31st of December and then suddenly.......ends......

      The thing is, something *does* happen at the end of the 31st of December – the earth ends it's current revolution around the sun.

      Mayan calendars (there are many of them) pretty much all track something interesting... Some track the moon, the sun, various stars. The reason that the popular myth about the end of the world persists is actually that all that can be deciphered about this particular calendar is that the mayans believed that it tracked the beginning of the world – people imagine that when it resets the world will need to be recreated, and hence need to end first.

    5. Re:Your toast - which way? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing is, something *does* happen at the end of the 31st of December – the earth ends it's current revolution around the sun.

      So what is so special about the point of the orbit it happens to reach at that time? It's not even the perihel (closest point to the sun), which comes a few days later, nor the winter solstice (when the tilt of the earth's axis aligns with the radial vector of the orbit), which is shortly before Christmas. There's absolutely nothing remarkable about the point in orbit at 31st of December.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Your toast - which way? by jadin · · Score: 1

      Woah! Revelations mentions 144,000!!! Coincidence? I think not!

    7. Re:Your toast - which way? by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      What else do you expect? The general populous to actually think rationally for a second and do some sort of basic fact checking?

    8. Re:Your toast - which way? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "There's absolutely nothing remarkable about the point in orbit at 31st of December."

      Except for a standing wave of fireworks on the dark side of the Earth that last for 24hrs.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  4. sure by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Funny

    *sniff *sniff*
    "The Sun did it".
    We all know it was Cowboy Neil.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick! Curb our CO2 emissions! They are burrowing into the sun!

  6. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

    1. Re:Exactly. by skratchjerk · · Score: 1

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      It harms me.

    2. Re:Exactly. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      It harms me.

      Yes, by contributing to global warming.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      It harms me.

      Yes, by contributing to global warming.

      Just stop with this fail "argument". Just stop.

      Methane, from living organisms on or near the surface of the planet do not contribute to Global Warming problem on any significant scale. The argument is as retarded as saying that clouds contribute to GW. It shows the utter ignorance of the problem and its real causes.

    4. Re:Exactly. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Clouds actually do NOT contribute. Having a high albedo, they reflect a lot of incoming sunlight back into space.

    5. Re:Exactly. by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      u are not a star

      moot on the other hand....

      --
      warning pointless sig
    6. Re:Exactly. by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      They don't contribute at all, because all the stuff we're giving out is stuff that was already in the atmosphere, and was fixed into plants and then back into animals (possibly us).

      The only thing that contributes to global warming is digging up carbon from under ground and putting it in the air, simple as that.

    7. Re:Exactly. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      however, there're made of water vapor, a known greenhouse gas.

    8. Re:Exactly. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      not according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane: "Slightly over half of the total emission is due to human activity", which is quoted from a UN report. Feel free to correct the article to prove me wrong.

    9. Re:Exactly. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, mostly..

      There is the argument about artificial fertilizers made from petroleum products, transportation of food stuffs and so on being used on a lot of the plant material that causes the an increase in global warming. But I have never seen anything that showed it to be a significant contribution in and of that alone.

    10. Re:Exactly. by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Yes I am immediately inclined to believe someone who uses a word like "there're".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.... what? What is the real problem and its real causes?

      Do you ever find yourself experiencing extreme cognitive dissonance telling people their arguments are fail without actually having any yourself?

      Let me guess... methane from non-organisms near the surface of the planet does contribute to global warming on a significant scale however? Is the real problem actually that there are people and that people do things which release more methane than otherwise would have been release?

      Is my .0001ppt CO2 emission over my lifetime really making that much of a difference, even times seven billion?

    12. Re:Exactly. by by+(1706743) · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clouds actually do NOT contribute. Having a high albedo, they reflect a lot of incoming sunlight back into space.

      Am I the only one who often misreads/mispronounces "albedo" as "libido"?

      I guess that could send the wrong message to friends when you're sitting outside staring at the moon and commenting on its reflectivity...

    13. Re:Exactly. by riverat1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Clouds develop when water vapor condenses in the atmosphere forming water droplets around condensation nuclei. But regarding their greenhouse effects clouds and water vapor are two different things with different absorption/reflection characteristics for radiant energy.

      Answering the GP, during daylight clouds can reflect sunlight back into space providing a cooling effect but the albedo depends on things like the size of the cloud droplets, the density of the cloud, the angle of the light hitting it and probably a few other things. At night though they reflect radiant energy back toward the surface or absorb it providing a warming effect. And around the world near the day/night separation line the sunlight can actually be reflected from the bottom of the clouds down to the Earth. Overall the effects of clouds on global warming appears to be slightly positive.

    14. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      Yes, but this hole is stretched wider than any hole you've seen before. It reminds me of ...

    15. Re:Exactly. by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      not according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane: "Slightly over half of the total emission is due to human activity", which is quoted from a UN report. Feel free to correct the article to prove me wrong.

      What for, one only has to actually understand what the article says to prove you wrong. "human activity" != "humans farting", it's as simple as that. Heck, Methane from human flatulence doesn't even show up as a contributing factor of anthropogenic emissions.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    16. Re:Exactly. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      Well then, I suggest you never go to Malawi where that sort of behaviour is illegal!

    17. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but hopefully you haven't been cornalholed.

    18. Re:Exactly. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Natural methane emissions from non-microbial life is inconsequential to climate, The influence of livestock wrt climate is about land use, not farting. Atmosphere-vegetable-animal-atmosphere is a closed loop. Some methane from microbial life (eg: melting permafrost) is a +ve feedback, not a forcing. This is the attribution graph you're looking for.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    19. Re:Exactly. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I have a hole, gas comes out, but it doesn't do much to harm Earth.

      Fortunately most of Earth is outdoors.

    20. Re:Exactly. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Atmosphere-vegetable-animal-atmosphere is a closed loop.

      Citation needed. None of the referred articles or anything else I've ever seen even imply the existence of atmosphere->"vegetable" part of a "loop" for methane. Plants fix CO2 from atmosphere for growth, not methane. If something, be it microbial or animal, then turns some of the carbon in plants into methane there has to be positive contribution of methane (and negative contribution to CO2).

    21. Re:Exactly. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Clouds actually do NOT contribute [to global warming]. Having a high albedo, they reflect a lot of incoming sunlight back into space.

      Actually, this is a question that until recently was "in dispute" among actual climate experts. The problem with a simple answer is that the actual situation is complicated.

      Some recent studies have been published showing that the actual anwer to "What effects do clouds have on the Earth's surface temperature?" is "It depends on the type of cloud. A lot of low, dense clouds turn out to be a net "greenhouse" phenomenon, intercepting IR and reflecting it back to the surface. Other clouds, especially high ice-crystal clouds, have a net cooling effect by reflecting incoming sunlight. And still other clouds have a mixed effect, with the upper parts reflecting sunlight and the lower parts trapping heat from below and reradiating it back down.

      So far, if you check with the summary articles, the consensus seems to be that clouds have an overall effect that's close to neutral, but this varies with time, and doesn't necessarily apply to specific parts of the world. What this means for the future is unclear.

      This is a case where the real world can't be reduced to a bumper-sticker slogan. And it's also a case where the best summary is "Further research is needed."

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  7. Probably been there for ages by xetovss · · Score: 1

    Just because it has been detected now doesn't mean it hasn't been around for hundreds, thousands, millions, or even billions of years already. So too early to say that these holes are anything to worry about. After all, the sun does coronal mass ejections quite often, some of which are aimed towards us, which while major events generally uneventful, maybe with some satellites knocked out.

    1. Re:Probably been there for ages by Burnhard · · Score: 0

      The word "concern" in science basically means they are concerned that they get more funding, rather than concerned about the hole.

    2. Re:Probably been there for ages by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3

      Actually, I cannot find that danger either in the linked article, not in the NASA article sustik linked to in a comment. The latter just says that we have to expect more auroras when the gas stream hits us "in a few days" (and that article was from Jan 11, so it probably has hit us quite some time ago, apparently without major damages).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Probably been there for ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So too early to say that these holes aren't anything to worry about.

      fixed. Your way is biased towards forgetting all about new discoveries until obvious issues arise. My way is biased towards not dismissing it, and keeping new information in the soup until we understand what it's effects are. If you say "nothing to see here" for everything, you'll be right 9 out of 10 times, so there's this trend in comments to dismiss everything, from a lack of spent nuclear fuel safety to global warming. But the game is not about saying the hay stack is free of needles and being 99.9% correct... the game, often enough, is about human lives. Be bold, and dare to be wrong most of the time... assume there is a needle in there when there probably isn't, and catch that unlikely danger even if it is very rare. This method is far more useful than trying to battle the media's attempt at scary sensationalism. Stop probably being right, and start being wrong until there is zero possibility that you aren't right.

    4. Re:Probably been there for ages by anlag · · Score: 1

      They've hardly been around for years and years. The Sun is much more dynamic than that, and these things form and disappear basically all the time. That doesn't mean they're any reason to be alarmed though. It's simply part of the Sun's normal behaviour.

    5. Re:Probably been there for ages by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The sun is an extremely active fusion reaction kept in check gravity, with extremely dynamic forces in play, driven by an-imaginable flows of energy. From the article "The new finding was made by Japan's Hinode sun-watching satellite which has been observing sun since 2006', so recent holes in the magnetic field which generate a visible presence.

      Now is it cause for concern, well that would depend upon the movement of the holes, in relation to the orbit of the time and the time it takes from projected matter from the sun to reach the earth.

      One day, probability only knows when, a mass ejection of matter from the sun will cause enormous problems on the earth, suck it up and get over it. Fore warning will of course be really handy in attempting to minimise the impact upon human society. BS ostrich head in the ground or God will save us, will do nothing but punish us for our ignorance and stupidity, forewarned is forearmed.

      Next time there is a fire, try making a fire engine, rather than just calling one that is sitting there idle wasting taxpayer dollars or heaven forbid called by an automatic fire alarm system that in the majority of instances, 90 percent or do nothing but waste profits for the majority of buildings. Now think of all those profit wasting fire sprinkler system, hundreds of millions of dollars every year, I'm sure given the chance Tea Partiers will make them non-compulsory. How many peoples lives are too high a price to gamble with.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  8. Bad Article by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holes in the sun! Sun losing gas to space! "Probably time is finally taking a toll on the benevolent star, which has been toiling hard for millennia!"

    I wouldn't exactly call this science journalism. No explanation why, what will happen, etc... The only link on the article is labeled "NASA", but points to the main page of this crappy website. To their credit they have a photo of the sun, but is from another solar space mission unrelated to the article.

    Hey editors, how on earth did this awful link get onto the main page?

    1. Re:Bad Article by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just an after thought... The article DID mention that this was reported on space.com, but they didn't provide a link. Here it is:

      http://www.space.com/10825-sun-holes-space-photo-hinode.html

      I had a look, it's way better. Maybe this should have been the link provided in the submission.

    2. Re:Bad Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it is is true the sun has been "toiling" for millennia. Just like I have been living for seconds, a lot of seconds.

    3. Re:Bad Article by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Shtiweasel site that steals from others and does so piss poorly and does not supply links to the original article.

      MSNBC the inbred masturbatory union of two megaliths does somewhat better.

      http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/10/6025925-satellite-spots-the-suns-latest-leaks

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:Bad Article by anlag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, went to post exactly the same thing. Not to bash the submission as such since it's nice to see people take an interest in my field of work, but surely it's not that much to ask to find the referenced article. Mind you, the space.com piece although better also doesn't go very much in depth of the subject. Then again one of the reasons for that is likely that it simply isn't a very big deal. The Sun is a very dynamic object, always has been and always will be. And that it spills stuff into space is hardly news, or cause for concern. They're still nice pictures though, from a great mission.

    5. Re:Bad Article by pavera · · Score: 1

      The space.com article still doesn't say why this is a concern, or even indicate that it is a concern.

      Neither article states whether this is a normal phenomena either... I'd imagine the magnetic field of stars fluctuates, but maybe the solar system is about to lose its power source... I guess we'll see later today?

    6. Re:Bad Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spot just one bug in slashdot. However that one is huge and makes the site unusable.

      When you zoom the text, (ctrl+ in Chrome), the text spills out on the right side of the window and comments become unreadable. You have to scroll to read each line.

      Is there a way to fix this, some external tool or style sheet? Another browser?

    7. Re:Bad Article by Stoutlimb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh I totally agree, I just thought it was nice to post a link to the article they were reporting on, seeing that neither they nor the submitter bothered to do so.

      In a nutshell, coronal holes are a large source of Solar Wind https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Solar_wind

    8. Re:Bad Article by sznupi · · Score: 1

      The Sun is a very dynamic object ... always will be

      I can't help but wonder, how does "always" exclude the black dwarf stage? ;)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:Bad Article by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh I imagine the "electric universe" folks are hyperventilating in terror right about now...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:Bad Article by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Hey editors, how on earth did this awful link get onto the main page?

      Time to step it up editors. The quality of the "articles" have been slipping for several months now.

      Personally, I'd rather see three extra minutes spent reviewing the quality of the linked articles than however long it takes to revamp the website every six months.

    11. Re:Bad Article by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      heh. I knew, all along, the universe was actually steam powered.

      knew it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re:Bad Article by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I spot just one bug in slashdot. However that one is huge and makes the site unusable.

      When you zoom the text, (ctrl+ in Chrome), the text spills out on the right side of the window and comments become unreadable.

      Are you suggesting that the comments are readable at the normal size? You must be new here.

    13. Re:Bad Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge CMEs happening TODAY on sun.

      http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/

      Stereo sun-orbiting satellites depict something much bigger than the official gallery's selection of CMEs.
      Now someone who can be bothered to write an article steal my link and do a nice little writeup for it.

    14. Re:Bad Article by syousef · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Probably time is finally taking a toll on the benevolent star, which has been toiling hard for millennia!"

      4.6 BILLION YEARS is 4.6 million millennia. Good work sounding completely foolish guys.

      The only thing more foolish is an article on a nerd site pointing to it. Next up: Top 10 songs of the week announced, and Pink says something like really like totally cool. News for bimbos? Stuff that's drivel?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:Bad Article by dch24 · · Score: 1

      Use some of the greasemonkey scripts

    16. Re:Bad Article by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's a bad style, we don't have good intuitive grasp on neither of those values - certainly not on millions of something, barely even on "millennia" (with just "one... maybe two or three" being the timespan that we convince ourselves we are grasping - but just look how poor grasp, when looked rigorously, we have on our own timescales, how many myths: merely convincing ourselves that the things we remember are exhaustive (quickly, recollect what were you doing in the last week of November... 1993; also, "times were always better when my (the greatest!) generation was young") or believing in fairly monolithic, unbroken consciousness (while we are generally closer to our peers than to ourselves at different life stages - heck, even split brain patients seem quite normal; there is also a particularly localized brain trauma causing people to become blind... without them realizing it! This is the grip we have on ourselves and our perceptions)

      Multiplicating such two values in popular publication only brings more confusion (but hey, it appears it was meant to be "scary"...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:Bad Article by syousef · · Score: 1

      It's a bad article simply because someone who knows nothing about the subject of stellar lifetimes and volatility is trying to comment on the topic. The misuse of terminology just adds to that

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  9. SOL by MarkRose · · Score: 1

    So if SOHO says Sol has holes, we're SOL?

    --
    Be relentless!
    1. Re:SOL by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So if SOHO says Sol has holes, we're SOL?

      So you're saying that telecommuters and small business are the problem?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  10. Well, that told me pretty much nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA is remarkably poorly written. Poor grammar, poor structure, poor explanation, poor sourcing. Something tells me this anonymous "IB Times Staff Reporter" got the job by answering "work from home" spam.

  11. And the concern is...? by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way I see it, unless one of those holes were pointed straight at us for an extended time, which is impossible due to difference in the orbital velocity of Earth and the rotational velocity of the Sun, we have nothing to worry about, and even then we'd only get a few blanked-out satellites.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    1. Re:And the concern is...? by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      The concern is coming from an anonymous International Business Times writer, who linked to the actual NASA release and said "OH NOES", then speculated that maybe the sun is just getting tired from working all the time. That is to say, somebody who knows nothing about the particular field he's "reporting" on is worried, and for no reason whatsoever.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what I thought too. During a solar minimum the whole side of the sun is a big whole. I was thinking there must be more to it so I was going to google the researchers and look into it more but screw it.

    3. Re:And the concern is...? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that it's extremely unlikely that a flare from either of these would hit us, I disagree with you on how serious it would be if they did. Relatively minor flares knock out satellites. Larger ones could easily cause a major extinction event. We have no scientific data regarding how often flares that larger happen, or how often they hit earth. But it is certainly within the realm of feasibility that one could be a very real problem for us in the future.

    4. Re:And the concern is...? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Funny

      For years man has yearned to destroy the sun. Now he has a reason: self-defense.

    5. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Larger ones could easily cause a major extinction event."

      Where on Earth are you getting this? There is ZERO evidence of this except in a few pseudoscientific TV shows that have about the same level of scientific quality as "2012" or "The Day After Tomorrow". Major extinction events in Earth history are associated with other processes such as large-scale volcanism, asteroid impacts, ocean stratification, etc., and as far as I know no one has ever identified any kind of extinction event -- small or large -- associated with solar flares. Even hypothetically, a significant problem with electronic devices and electricity distribution systems does not equate with "extinction", let alone "major extinction".

    6. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is "Nothing to see here. Move along."

    7. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if the Sun's guts spill out the hole then that can't be good.

      A deflated Sun will certainly have negative consequences for us.

    8. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I let gas out of mine, my wife claims "You're just as deadly, no matter which way Uranus is pointed."

    9. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Larger ones could easily cause a major extinction event." Citation please. Everything I've read said the only major threats are to electronics. A huge flare pointed right at us would be mostly unnoticed if not for electronics, power systems, and some pretty aurorae.

    10. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448011/

      [Bad acting aside] :D

    11. Re:And the concern is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Larger ones could easily cause a major extinction event. We have no scientific data regarding how often flares that larger happen, or how often they hit earth.

      I was going to put up [citation needed] about the extinction event, but you admitted in the next sentence that you're just talking out of your ass.

    12. Re:And the concern is...? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      This is a very big deal and can have significant impact on the evolution of robotic species. I watched a documentary on this very subject and they ACTUALLY caught a massive flare on film. Pass the hooker.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    13. Re:And the concern is...? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      "Larger ones could easily cause a major extinction event." .

      Citation please.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clockwork_Origin

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  12. Don't panic by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't freak out that there's now an opening in the corona. Freak out when a celestial lime slice gets wedged it.

    1. Re:Don't panic by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Don't freak out that there's now an opening in the corona. Freak out when a celestial lime slice gets wedged it.

      I suspect if the sun suddenly gets turned into crappy beer, that is a clear sign I've been living in the wrong solar system all this time ...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Don't panic by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      Good news is, Corona is directly correlated with my ability to get lucky. Enough Corona to fill the sun would surely increase my odds.

  13. Obligatory Image for the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is an image of the goatse guy when you need it?

  14. Strange brew that's also good for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be home made Kombucha(org) Tea. You call this 'weather'?

  15. TSIF by phrostie · · Score: 1

    The Sky Is Falling!

    1. Re:TSIF by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Guess we need to launch a mission to patch those holes. Of course, for the safety of the astronauts, so that they don't burn up, they will do it at night.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:TSIF by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  16. Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no! A hole in the sun. Call the president, America will save us!!

  17. Ah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So THAT is where all the sun spots went!

    1. Re:Ah. by ArmchairGeneral · · Score: 1

      It's full of stars!

  18. Nothing unusual AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Extremely badly written article. The coronal holes over the south and north pole of the sun have basically always been there, and been predicted by solar wind models for at least 50 years. The news here is simply that the hinode spacecraft managed to image them conclusively for the first time.

    No reason to be concerned. Trust me, I'm a solar scientist.

    1. Re:Nothing unusual AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, I'm a solar scientist.

      Darn!

      We were hoping for an Earth scientist. Everyone knows you can't trust those Sol brothers.

  19. Great - just what we need. by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    A solar fart.

    1. Re:Great - just what we need. by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      But it's only dangerous if the sun farts in our general direction.

    2. Re:Great - just what we need. by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      A solar fart.

      ... a much more interesting occurrence than the far more usual lunar farts.

  20. old song by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of an "educational" song I was exposed to when I was five or six:

    The Sun is a mass,

    of incandescent gas,

    a gigantic nuclear furnace.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:old song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an "educational" song I was exposed to when I was five or six:

      The Sun is a mass,

      of incandescent gas,

      a gigantic nuclear furnace.

      They Might Be Giants, ftw!

    2. Re:old song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black hole Sun
      Won't you come
      And wash away the rain.

    3. Re:old song by snookums · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an "educational" song I was exposed to when I was five or six:

      The Sun is a mass,

      of incandescent gas,

      a gigantic nuclear furnace.

      They Might Be Giants, ftw!

      They Might Be Giants, for the cover-version of a track from the 1959 album Space Songs.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
  21. Yippie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo! We're all gonna die! We're all gonna die!
    Oh! Wait!

  22. Spaceweather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On spaceweather.com you have a daily picture of the sun: sunspots, holes... what I find interesting, that each and every day, when systems or people around me start behaving, then it's always something on the sun. So - what you've got is nothing new. How did your neighbor behave today?

  23. Non-story, clueless writer by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Visit spaceweather.com daily for a month or two, and keep an eye on the various Sun images on the left side. One is used to point out coronal holes, and you'll quickly realize how common they are. This may be related to the approaching solar maximum, though don't quote me on that.

    I'm much more concerned about flare and mass ejection frequency. With all the satellites and poorly-shielded electrical circuits we rely upon, one or two wicked ejections aimed at Earth could turn a lot of gear into expensive junk.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Visit spaceweather.com daily for a month or two, and keep an eye on the various Sun images on the left side. One is used to point out coronal holes, and you'll quickly realize how common they are. This may be related to the approaching solar maximum, though don't quote me on that.

      I'm much more concerned about flare and mass ejection frequency. With all the satellites and poorly-shielded electrical circuits we rely upon, one or two wicked ejections aimed at Earth could turn a lot of gear into expensive junk.

      Hmm, I kind of figured as much. I wonder if authors are really writing FUD for advertisement clicks. Yikes.

    2. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I was just watching the remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" and reading your post makes me think that probably a major 'Carrington Event' would probably do a good (?) lot more than just turning some gear into expensive junk.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    3. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I was just watching the remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" and reading your post makes me think that probably a major 'Carrington Event' would probably do a good (?) lot more than just turning some gear into expensive junk.

      It wouldn't burn the Earth or anything like that, but it'd certainly turn a lot of gear into expensive junk.

      Granted, an event large enough to blow out transformers on the ground, as well as other infrastructure, would result in far more than a "little damage", but it wouldn't be an apocalypse.

      NASA has an article on the Carrington Event that tries to put it into modern context. This is obviously something we should build our infrastructure to be able to handle (if possible), and I'm sure we will for at least 20 years after the next major event.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    4. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes, we know that the Sun frequently has coronal holes, and has probably done so for millions of years.
      But this time it's different - THIS time the holes are caused by man! It's because you drive a car that the Sun is now going to explode, and now there's absolutely nothing you can do about it as proven by our infallible science.
      But let's tax everyone and raise the cost of gas and electricity and try really hard anyway, if we believe hard enough and act RIGHT NOW, we can save the Sun, as proven by our infallible science.
      But don't leave it for too long, we only have 5-20 years to act, otherwise we will die, as proven by our infallible science.
      But seriously, if we don't do something within the next 1 or 2 centuries, we might die. There's infallible science behind it.
      Don't bother trying to argue with me on this though. The science is settled, so if you disagree with me you must be a denier paid by Big Sun.
      If you don't believe me, just look outside. The Sun is brighter than yesterday, therefore it must be about to explode. Oh, and if the Sun doesn't look brighter, that's because it's fading away and about to die. Oh, and if the Sun looks the same as it did yesterday, or you refuse to look at the Sun, or if it's night time where you are, then you must be part of the conspiracy or are incredibly stupid.

    5. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I am much more concerned about human tendencies to do the wrong things for short term profit. Failing satellites are bad and if all of them fail at once, Internet bandwidth will go down and the weather forecast will become worse. Oh yes and I would have to ask people where to go instead of my navigation tool on my "smart" phone. But these effects are not that disturbing than the news about western governments which do not know what they should do about Egypt or Tunisia (just as an example).

      So before I worry about solar activity, I worry about the void in our government heads.

    6. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Satellites are designed for a given period of operation that takes into account our best predictions of space weather. Shielding and circuitry hardware selections are made as a result of those solar activity models. Increased solar activity is not going to turn any satellites into expensive junk, unless the satellites were designed as expensive junk in the first place, in which case, they probably aren't operating in the manner they are supposed to be, if at all.

    7. Re:Non-story, clueless writer by foobsr · · Score: 1

      There is also this one: "Severe Space Weather Events--Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report" ( http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12507&page=1 ).

      I did not read this one, but a summary that I apparently cannot find again.

      Anyway, I doubt that adequate precautions will be installed, since IMHO these would require an essentially distributed model.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  24. Wrong title by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    This site have a common profile for readers that should had been taken into account making the title of article. Something like "Sun farted. Oracle got it", or "We are toast, starting by Nokia". Should't be so bad, in other sites could had been "2012 doomsday true, Sun starting to break", "Another proof that global warming is a myth", or "The dangers of loose bullets"

  25. Bad Gas? by Mithrandris · · Score: 2

    So our sun is venting fuel.. Probably didn't like the 15% Ethenol in it.. If the sun sees fit to fertalize space with it - odds are my car won't like it either.

    1. Re:Bad Gas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you want, we can pour hydrogen into your car. I doubt you'll get actual Fusion from it like the sun, but it'll still be fine with regular combustion, and the waste products will be much cleaner

  26. Magnetic Void? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im confused, I know that the sky is falling. I know that its caused by greenhouse gasses. I just dont know how in the hell the gasses got up there. Somebody better call Al Gore for me.

  27. There's a little black spot on the sun today. by deadhammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the same old thing as yesterday.

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    1. Re:There's a little black spot on the sun today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original article: http://www.space.com/10825-sun-holes-space-photo-hinode.html
      The hole is not exactly little, it is about as big as a few million earths, if not bigger.

    2. Re:There's a little black spot on the sun today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a black hat caught in a high tree top.

    3. Re:There's a little black spot on the sun today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many slashdotters are old enough to get that reference :)

    4. Re:There's a little black spot on the sun today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying... there's a BLACK HOLE on the SUN?

    5. Re:There's a little black spot on the sun today. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      That's a mighty big hole, considering the surface area of the entire Sun is only about twelve thousand times the Earth.

  28. They've since updated the song by dsginter · · Score: 1

    The Sun is a Miasma of Incandescent Plasma They make a great children's CD, BTW.

    --
    More
    1. Re:They've since updated the song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twinkle, twinkle, little star
      I don't wonder what you are.
      You're a cooling down of gases
      forming into solid masses.

  29. Cycle peak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure we are at the nastiest point of he current solar cycle.

  30. Let's just call it what it is... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Looking at the NASA link above, I think they have discovered a "Solar Goatse".
    Now the trick will be getting the other solar systems to look at it...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  31. Lovely by thermal_7 · · Score: 1

    So the sun is farting?

  32. sun corona video feb 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sun corona video february 2011 here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NixmnoWE8RQ

  33. One atom at a time by mbone · · Score: 1

    These "holes" maybe let out 1 million atoms per cubic centimeter. That may sound like a lot, but on Earth this would be called a hard vacuum.

    The Sun is also converting 6.2×10**11 kg of matter into energy per second and radiating it all away. One wonders that there is anything left after all of this time.

    1. Re:One atom at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wonders? I don't. I know the Sun is Very Big.

    2. Re:One atom at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sun is also converting 6.2×10**11 kg of matter into energy per second and radiating it all away. One wonders that there is anything left after all of this time.

      That is wrong.
      6.2*10^11 kg/s is only the amount of matter, that takes part in the fusion reaction.
      The amount of matter that is converted into energy and radiated away is rather about 4.3*10^9 kg/s.

    3. Re:One atom at a time by Nikkos · · Score: 1

      The Sun is also converting 6.2×10**11 kg of matter into energy per second and radiating it all away. One wonders that there is anything left after all of this time.

      Using that number along with the estimated mass of the Earth at 6E+24 kg, it takes the sun 307000 years to burn off one Terra. The estimate for number of Earths that could fit into the sun is 1.3 million (volume, not mass) so it would take 399 Billion years for the sun to burn off an equivalent volume of Earths assuming a similar mass/density.

      I don't think you've anything to worry about. ;)

    4. Re:One atom at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting too, that at its core it is producing heat on par with any ordinary active compost heap.

  34. help me plan my afternoon by atarione · · Score: 1

    so the wife just asked what i want to do this afternoon.... it would be helpful if someone could clarify if we are all going to die or not?

    because if we are I'm going to be god damned if i'm going to go home depot for supplies to fix things about the house.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:help me plan my afternoon by jovius · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are going to die. Maybe not today though.

    2. Re:help me plan my afternoon by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like we all died back in 2003.

      Nothing to see here. Move along.

    3. Re:help me plan my afternoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prove it

  35. Only a class C type flares expected. by novar21 · · Score: 2

    It wont even create a good aurora. We need a good M type flare for that. Bummer. The wife really wants to see a good aurora someday. We live to close to the city lights for any good viewing. We would have to drive out into the country. Well since we are approaching solar maximum, we might have to take a drive in the next year or two. Here is the link that describes the events: www.spaceweather.com "BEHEMOTH SUNSPOT 1158: Sunspot 1158 is growing rapidly (48 hour movie) and crackling with C-class solar flares. The active region is now more than 100,000 km wide with at least a dozen Earth-sized dark cores scattered beneath its unstable magnetic canopy. Earth-directed eruptions are likely in the hours ahead." Class M flares are good for viewing. Class X is where we lose electricity or radio/satellites.

    1. Re:Only a class C type flares expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hows M6 for you?

      X-ray Solar Flares
      6-hr max: M6 1738 UT Feb13
      24-hr: M6 1738 UT Feb13
      http://www.spaceweather.com/

    2. Re:Only a class C type flares expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wont even create a good aurora. We need a good M type flare for that. Bummer. The wife really wants to see a good aurora someday. We live to close to the city lights for any good viewing. We would have to drive out into the country. Well since we are approaching solar maximum, we might have to take a drive in the next year or two. Here is the link that describes the events: www.spaceweather.com "BEHEMOTH SUNSPOT 1158: Sunspot 1158 is growing rapidly (48 hour movie) and crackling with C-class solar flares. The active region is now more than 100,000 km wide with at least a dozen Earth-sized dark cores scattered beneath its unstable magnetic canopy. Earth-directed eruptions are likely in the hours ahead."

      Class M flares are good for viewing. Class X is where we lose electricity or radio/satellites.

      Well, Guess What!?? The predictions were slightly off. They were expecting class C, maybe, but as of now, www.spaceweather.com is reporting a class M6.6 Coronal Mass Ejection is heading our way, from sunspot number 1138 (They reported it as of UTC 1738)!
      So, stay tuned. Maybe we will get some pretty aurora, after all.

    3. Re:Only a class C type flares expected. by novar21 · · Score: 1

      Cool! I guess I looked to soon. Maybe the wife will get her wish. I have to check the weather now.

    4. Re:Only a class C type flares expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you won't have to wait long:

      EARTH-DIRECTED SOLAR FLARE: On Feb. 13th at 1738 UT, sunspot 1158 unleashed the strongest solar flare of the year so far, an M6.6-category blast.

    5. Re:Only a class C type flares expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Update shows an earth directed M6.6 class flare heading our way so you may get your wish after all.

  36. That's my sould up there by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    There's a black cat caught in a high tree top

  37. He Who Smelled it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He who smelled it, dealt it as the saying goes, so stop trying to blame the sun...

  38. sould = sould (grumble...) by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, can we get an edit button?

  39. TFA by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I wish the article would give some scientific reasons for why we should be concerned about "Two Huge Holes" and not leave it to the masses to make uneducated gesticulations. Does this mean that the sun is dying?

  40. The sun is farting at us! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Of course its bad!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:The sun is farting at us! by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Of course its bad!

      Sure it is. Indeed, farting should only be done by the moon!

  41. So long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is it.

    We're going to die.

  42. Would It Matter? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Whether it were proven to be dying tomorrow or a couple hundred years from now, we're nowhere close to being able to go anywhere or survive without it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  43. This is obviously Bush's fault. by anwyn · · Score: 1

    It could not be anyone else's.

    1. Re:This is obviously Bush's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame gun control, gay weddings and Obama Bin Laden.

  44. Did someone use DESTINI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did someone fire DESTINI at the sun? Do we have to have CORE 2 with Virgil 2 to drill to the center of the sun to restart its core?

  45. quick! by rayk_sland · · Score: 1

    :Let's start a furore over solar cooling!!

    --
    Jedis are stupid. If they were so powerful, why couldn't they handle counseling for a kid who missed his mom?
  46. Now I know ! by Zorlon · · Score: 1

    God is going to pick the sun up like a bowling ball and toss it into the black hole in the center of the milky way. Probably on 12/21/2012

    --
    - Things are the way they are because they're coded that way -
  47. reason to be concerned by louic · · Score: 1

    "it appears there is some reason to be concerned about" Yeah! Let's all be concerned about this. That'll help.

  48. pass gas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most creatures only need one hole to pass gas. The Sun needs two!

  49. we are doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First there was holes in the ozone layer. Now they are in the Sun itself. Damn you greedy corporations, you should have listened the warnings!

  50. Someone popped the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and as buggy's used to say 'thats all folks'. Pity we didn't put any DNA on the Voyager's, but Hay-ho there's bugger all out there to reconstruct humans

  51. Someone call Al Gore, quick! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    It sounds like solar warming must be creating holes in its magnetic field!

  52. Sorry about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops, sorry about that! I'll pick a different celestial body to test my deathray on in the future...

  53. Re:sould = sould (grumble...) by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    At least you didn't make the same mistake the second time.

  54. Sun tired of energy being stolen, protesting by schwep · · Score: 2

    After decades of 'free' energy being stolen from the sun, the sun has finally had enough & started a protest. If the 'free' energy theft continues, according to sources close to the sun who wish to remain unnamed, then it will start sending DRM takedown notices to all solar panel owners. The sun's legal team insists that solar power harvesting is breaking the physical encryption it is using & is therefore covered by the DMCA.

    The sun could not be reached for direct comment.

    1. Re:Sun tired of energy being stolen, protesting by joeyadams · · Score: 1

      The sun could not be reached for direct comment.

      They should try again in the morning.

    2. Re:Sun tired of energy being stolen, protesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day, sun goes up, sun goes down. You can't explain that.

  55. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Gobal Warming scam artists are going to sink their pseudo-science claws into this. :(

  56. Must be global warming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or else it's Bush's fault.

  57. what do you expect? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    Hey! the sun is over 5 Billion years old. like us humans, it is bound to start showing its age.

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  58. falling sky by confused+one · · Score: 1

    Great. There's a hole in the Sun. Now all the helium will leak out and the Sun won't float in the sky anymore.

  59. Al Gore reports in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The coronal holes are caused by Global Warming.....

  60. Did the Sun just Goasty us ?? by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

    Sorry had to ask.

  61. Fire in the Hole! by BraksDad · · Score: 1

    OMG my sun might fart on us.

    --
    Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  62. That's all Oracle's fault by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  63. Ignorance is bliss... by jason18 · · Score: 1

    Give 'em a week and some crackpot's gonna say this'll cause the End Of The World in 2012. These holes have been around forever and now that we know about them, they'll surely kill us all.

  64. An opening to let gas escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In common parley.. that is called farting.

    1. Re:An opening to let gas escape? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      You mean parlance; a parley is a discussion between two groups of people, especially in order to try to settle an argument.

  65. Coronal mass ejection by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Is this how a piece of the sun shoots out and hits passing federation science ships while its gravity threatens a long lost colony?

  66. Is there any danger of Earth falling into them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this does not answer the most important question: Is there any danger of Earth falling into one of these holes? Or indeed, if Earth would even fit into these holes? People are panicking!

  67. human made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least nobody will dare to say that this is human made...

  68. I Always Knew The Sun Was a Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out the two holes are an inch apart.

  69. Holes and Gas by SilkBD · · Score: 1

    Two holes with Gas shooting out.... come on people I'm in a deadlock as to which of the million jokes this generates.......

    --
    00101010
  70. The real question is by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

    When the spewed out material hits mother earth in her face, will she spit or swallow?

    --
    $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
  71. Not News by jasnw · · Score: 1

    The solar research community has known about coronal holes, and the potential impact of plasma which can flow through these "holes" on earth, for decades. This appears to be another "sky is falling" piece by people who are desperately awaiting the return of solar activity. The current solar cycle is a very late starter, and given that the "seasons" for space weather geeks (myself included) is 11-12 years long, one starts getting antsy when the long, dry solar minimum stretches a couple of years longer than expected. In short, "move along, nothing to see here."

  72. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until someone offers "evidence" that this is our fault as a species; and you thought global warming guilt was bad.

  73. let me get my checkbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much money do I have to give to Al Gore to make this go away?

  74. C'mon, people! The sun has been farting since 4evr by kalqlate · · Score: 1

    Oh, like you haven't.