Slashdot Mirror


Can Consumers Fight Package Thieves With Technology? (geekwire.com)

Every year more than 10 million packages are stolen off doorsteps, according to a study by August Home Inc. -- a company which sells a "smart" door lock that's controlled by your cellphone so you can remotely let a delivery person into your house. But that's just one of the weird ways consumers are using technology to try to fight package thieves. An anonymous reader reports: Some online shopping sites will now also text you when one of their packages gets left on your doorstep, according to GeekWire, which reports that for a thousand bucks you can also just buy a lockable iBin parcel-delivery box. But there's also a startup selling an odd new product called Package Guard, "a Frisbee sized, wi-fi-enabled device that alerts a user when a package has been delivered and set on top of it. Package Guard sets off a loud alarm if anyone unauthorized tries to remove the package."

GeekWire details the frustration of one Seattle police detective. "Bach knows the crimes are happening, he knows it all spikes during the holiday season and he knows that the few thieves who are caught are likely to see little if any jail time." (Though Bach admits "We do a wide variety of undercover stings," including a recent operation involving mobile surveillance with a "major delivery company.") One Seattle man even attempted to stop thieves by installing a Ring smart doorbell to film activity on his doorstep, only to discover that this only enabled him to watch helplessly as a thief opened his package, and then successfully stole all of its contents.

Though he yelled at the video "Bring my package back now!" that thief was never caught.

295 comments

  1. Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Guns

    1. Re:Solved by jandersen · · Score: 2

      A fat lot that will help, when the problem is that delivry firms dump the packet outside and drive off. A more sensible approach would be to have safe delivery spots - or more, since I already see them here and there: something like a wall of steel lockers, where the delivery is deposited. The recipient will then get a code to unlock it sent to his mobile.

      Or legislation: the seller should be liable for the loss of the goods, unless they can show a receipt with a signature and a photo of who signed. Something like that. It shouldn't be up to the consumer to solve the problem, because they are the ones least able to fix it.

    2. Re:Solved by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Guns don't protect packages. People with guns protect packages. The assumptive problem is folks are not home when these items are being lifted.

      Option 1A: If you have a yard, get a dog that barks and make it a point to introduce it to the delivery people when you are home. A vocal canine will dissuade most would be thieves, and there's one looking for a human right now at a pound near you.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Solved by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not the seller, the courier. Leaving a package on a doorstep is no less negligent than leaving it on the side of the road and telling someone to go get it before it's stolen. This should be covered under existing law.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re: Solved by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Funny

      No one's thieving my package; I'm wearing a cup.

    5. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fat lot that will help,

      Just the threat would probably work better than a Ring Smart Doorbell. That dude probably made the mistake of yelling "Bring my package back now!" with his Barack Obama voice. That wouldn't scare a rabbit out of the flower patch. You've got to use the Mr. T voice.

    6. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is shouting "just keep it!" at them going to be any more effective?

    7. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Guns

      ... "and Roses"? Or "and assassinations"? (a package has more value than a life?

    8. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turds work better than guns. If you have a package theft problem, simply take a dump in a bag, put it in a box and leave it on your porch.

    9. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add to be sure and tell the wife.

    10. Re:Solved by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 0

      A thief's life has no value.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    11. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      delivry firms dump the packet outside and drive off

      I think it's a crime here in Brazil, but IANAL... (at least, it's a very bad delivery service...)

    12. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      People with guns protect packages

      ... and can shot thieves: a package values more than a life?!?!?

    13. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      +1 informative (mod parent up!)

    14. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Or legislation: the seller should be liable for the loss of the goods, unless they can show a receipt with a signature and a photo of who signed. Something like that. It shouldn't be up to the consumer to solve the problem, because they are the ones least able to fix it.

      I think it occurs here in Brazil (and I don't know any stolen delivered package up to now...)

    15. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Everybody is "a thief"... I'm one, you are one. The law is made to protect us from barbarity (that can be made with weapons, for example...) - "guns" are not the answer for nothing "civilized"...

    16. Re:Solved by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly this. Especially if the person is home and the courier leaves the package outside without even trying to ring the doorbell. We've had expensive shipments sitting outside for hours because UPS drivers don't ring the doorbells. Both of our cars are in the driveway, our lights are on, and sounds are coming from our house, but they still toss the package down and walk off. We've called UPS and they said it's their policy for drivers to ring the doorbells, but the drivers don't seem to follow through.

      FedEx seems better at this by us, but this might vary depending on your local drivers. They need to enforce this policy better. Yes, it will mean slightly longer times needed for delivery (since "ring doorbell and wait 30 seconds" is longer than "drop package and walk away"), but it's worth it if it reduces package theft.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    17. Re:Solved by msauve · · Score: 1

      R/C paintball gun (aka "marker), loaded with paintballs filled with indelible dye and long lasting stinky stuff (butyric acid?).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    18. Re:Solved by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      Yup otherwise people will steal everything you have and you will die.

      The question is can vs should, you need to be able to shoot them you should not do it unless absolutely necessary. Anything you make illegal you agree that it's worth depriving somebodys life over. Because you will get that person that refuses to or simply can not live within that rule. Police and the courts will do it for you but overall it's still depriving somebody of their life one way or another.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    19. Re:Solved by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how on Earth is this possible.
      Living in a so-called 3rd world country and the courier's contract is solid. They are not allowed to drop parcels anywhere else than in the end user's hands. No door step dropping or other fuckery.
      The parcel value should be paid in full to the end user if their signature is not on the paperwork.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    20. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The seller should be liable to the consumer for getting the package to them. They can get it to them however they want, USPS, Fedex, three wise old men (one in a taxi, one in a car, one on a scooter blowing his hooter) - but the bottom line should be if the package doesn't turn up, the seller simply didn't fulfil their half of the transaction and the money.

      Of course, the courier should also be liable to the seller, so if the consumer doesn't get anything after they shipped, the seller should have recourse to recover their losses from the courier too.

    21. Re:Solved by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Nah, combustible fake packages sitting at your front door with a timer that starts counting after it is jostled. They won't know which is which. Nothing crazy. Just some old motor oil or something.

    22. Re:Solved by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      It's not that the package is worth more. Thieves do much more damage than just the economic loss. They inconvenience everyone along the supply chain from the homeowner to Amazon and on it goes. It forces you to constantly wonder if you locked everything even when you just pop out to grab a gallon of milk. Moreover the thieves themselves frequently only get pennies on the dollar when they fence the goods so it really isn't worth it. If the homeowner catches them and holds them at gunpoint for the police great. If the thief gets brave and tries to fight the home owner then they get what was coming to them. To make the world a better place you have to weed out the bad actors. This is one of the very few things the Muslims got right.

    23. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With UPS you can specify that a package be delivered to a nearby UPS store, where you can pick it up. Even if the package is already in transit you can re-direct it to the store.

    24. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delivery at legal responsibility of the seller does not solve the issue? Why any weapon is needed?!

    25. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't get a dog for this. We all know who owns dogs in the neighborhood and hate them for the constant barking. The most I might do if your dog is barking constantly at someone taking your package is to file a noise complaint. Unless your dog can actually bite someone taking your package they aren't much of deterrent, and even then be ready to pay for the hospital bill since the bite occurred on your property (yes, you are liable).

    26. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure they have done the math, Fight Club style, and figured it is cheaper to have a few packages stolen then slow the drivers down. If the costs gets high enough, they will go back to having someone sign for a delivery.

    27. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had ups leave over $5000 in network equipment in the shared hallway (shared with residential owners) outside our business.

    28. Re: Solved by rantrantrant · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm afraid that at least some Americans have internalized the NRA's message, "Guns are the answer. Now, what's the question?" Guns should never be used to protect property. Only to protect lives when it's the last resort, after you've tried everything else humanly possible. I agree that the responsibility lies with the delivery contractors and they should be liable for any loss or damage of parcels up until the moment the recipients physically have them in their hands.

    29. Re:Solved by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      People with guns protect packages

      ... and can shot thieves: a package values more than a life?!?!?

      We're talking America you know, nothing is cheaper than life.

      Not actually, most people who are all about guns are just fearful cowards that think a gun cures every problem.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:Solved by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It is, that's why I'm personally not worried if my package goes missing, I just call the seller, they file a claim with the carrier for the value and I get my package a few days later.

      Our carriers will literally toss the package over the porch railing because walking up the steps and ringing a doorbell is hard work.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    31. Re:Solved by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's not that the package is worth more. Thieves do much more damage than just the economic loss. They inconvenience everyone along the supply chain from the homeowner to Amazon and on it goes.

      So are you planning on a quick headshot, or are you more into a gutshot so you can watch them flop around while they bleed out?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    32. Re:Solved by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 2

      Why do you want them to wait 30 seconds? USPS, FedEX and UPS all drop my package, ring the bell and leave. I don't see what waiting for me to answer is going to do for me. Also, don't you get a notification you package has been delivered as soon as they mark that in the handheld they carry?

    33. Re:Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      People with guns protect packages

      ... and can shot thieves:

      a package values more than a life?!?!?

      Yes.

      If the asshole wasn't stealing, he'd not be in danger of getting shot, now would he?

      Depends on the state you live in, but I believe in TX, you can very legally shoot someone on your property trying to steal your property.

      Get enough of this going and you'll (finally) have some real deterrent to idiots doing shit like this.

      It was not that many years back, in New Orleans East, a guy in his apt saw some thieves in his car trying to steal stuff, he shot at them from his balcony, one got away, the other one was dead.

      They actually tried to try this guy, but no jury around here would convict him.

      I think it also had to do with in the state of LA, your car is considered and extension of your home, and many same laws about protecting it cover both.

      Again, my thought is...FUCK'EM...if they weren't doing something wrong, they'd not have been shot.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it depends on if they steal minor things like computer mice or if they steal major things like A/V systems. For the little things, I let them off easy and do a headshot. However, if they're going to steal my stereo or television, I shoot them in the gut and let them bleed out while they cry for their mothers.

    35. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about a safe delivery spot like... a room where the item is delivered, where there are people paid to watch over the item and ensure it's not stolen. To make things even more secure, the people watching the item can also handle the money - this should reduce online fraud as well.

      Actually, considering economies of scale, it might be best to already have the room filled up with various items that customers can just come in and buy on the spot. How do they know where any given item will be? Well, the storage places - let's call them something hip like Storz - can each have a unifying theme. Like one would only have items related to food, and another only items to sports....

      I wonder if there is a market for this

    36. Re:Solved by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      In the UK it's either covered by law or it's the policy of the post office not to do this. However, a few years ago the post office delivery guys started acting up in certain areas due to low pay. For a time I had several packages stolen from outside my front door. I went to the post office and spoke with the guy in charge. He outright denied that his staff were leaving parcels outside my door and challenged me to prove it. I just decided to stop getting packages delivered home since I was to move house soon anyway. The next place I moved to was more isolated, so no fear of getting stuff stole, but a new problem developed. The posties decided that it was too far to walk (about 100 m down a path) and just didn't deliver some of the mail. I found out this was happening when I got the fourth reminder to pay a traffic violation but missed the first three. The fine had gone up following each reminder. Fuckers cost me 300 bucks.

    37. Re:Solved by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      So are you planning on a quick headshot, or are you more into a gutshot so you can watch them flop around while they bleed out?

      Indoors, you go for the head shot. Otherwise they could move into other rooms spurting blood everywhere. And I don't want to have to pay the carpet cleaners for any additional rooms.

      Sometime in late 2004 Martha Stewart had a great show on this. She showed all kinds of different plastic shower curtains that looked great on the floor. Which was really convenient for keeping the mess to a minimum. She also recommended using duck tape to wrap the perp in the shower curtain for easy removal and cleanup. These days you can get all kinds of patterned duck tape too, so you shouldn't have much difficulty finding one that matches the shower curtain.

    38. Re:Solved by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Awesome, so I can't take the risk as the buyer?

      That's stupid.

      When I ship, I have the option of leave safe on front porch, neighbor or recipient sig required, or recipient required.

      As far as reviving, I've have had hundreds of packages the last two years, one theft, and my stuff was returned even.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    39. Re:Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      So are you planning on a quick headshot, or are you more into a gutshot so you can watch them flop around while they bleed out?

      Well, let's be realistic.

      When you're having to shoot someone, you aren't going to be playing "Lone Ranger" and trying to shoot to wound....and you also don't get any "points" for trying hard things like headshot.

      You aim for the largest target mass of the person,the torso.....land about 3x hits with a .40 cal and they'll likely not be bothering you again any time soon.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    40. Re:Solved by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Once the storz specialize as you describe, they become as inconvenient as stores.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    41. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's less likely about "hard work" and much more likely to be they extremely high quota they have to make. They literally can't afford the time to walk up and ring every doorbell.

      Go ahead an paint them as lazy as you demand cheap or free shipping.

    42. Re: Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Guns should never be used to protect property.

      Why not?

      Depending on the state you live in, you are perfectly within your rights to shoot a thief on your property.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    43. Re:Solved by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Although unpopular among many here, in Canada we are moving towards a system of community mailboxes, which is essentially what you describe. Rather than a postal worker delivering mail to each house, there are banks of mailboxes where people get their mail (all their mail). You are issued a key for your mailbox so you can go get it whenever you want, and it is secure. Packages that fit inside the mailbox just go in the regular spot. There are also compartments for packages that are larger to accommodate larger packages. In this case, you receive a key in your mailbox and the box that your package is in. You retrieve your package, and then drop the key off into the mail slot again for reuse.

      Works pretty well and for most packages, solves the problem.

    44. Re:Solved by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Please don't get a dog for this. We all know who owns dogs in the neighborhood and hate them for the constant barking. The most I might do if your dog is barking constantly at someone taking your package is to file a noise complaint.

      I'm not sure where you live, but during delivery hours, most places don't have noise laws unless the volume level exceeds a set number of decibels. During those times you can't lodge a complaint that will be pursued.

      Unless your dog can actually bite someone taking your package they aren't much of deterrent, and even then be ready to pay for the hospital bill since the bite occurred on your property (yes, you are liable).

      This is very location dependent.

    45. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking some sort of big local distribution centre where you can go. Maybe payment could be delayed until you get there, even, and maybe they could even take and fulfill orders from sone sort of on premise stock. Since they'd be storing your stuff there until you pick it up, I propose calling it a "store". I may patent the concept.

    46. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. There are 7 billion people and 200000 more every day. There is only one package with what I want and with my name on it. The logic is simple.
      Life is the cheapest thing there is.

    47. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF only they rang the bell. Ordered a new laptop for my wife and watched from my home office window the person place the package, clearly marked with DELL all over it, on the stoop and leave. If I had not been working from home that day, I doubt the package would have been still there later in the day since there has been a rash of package thefts in our area.

    48. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "duct" tape, you mongo.

    49. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 0

      +1 Informative

    50. Re: Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      "you can kill someone that invades your property" is a value that exists (absurdly, I think...) in the Brazilian Constitution...

    51. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      and if hi's not stealing? "Shot first, ask later", huh?

    52. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the issues in the UK was (it seems to have improved in the last year) that delivery schedules were essentially impossible for mortal humans to meet, and there was no time to hand over the package, get a signature, etc. Given that the odd pension funding requirements have put UPS under strain and UPS might be understaffed and having similar issues.

    53. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I understand the absurdities made by US police nowadays: there's public support!

    54. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, kill yourself, AC

    55. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh...

    56. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't give a time allowance to walk to 100m there and back, or didn't used to. Your best option might be to accept having a mailbox on the road

    57. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be funny if it was not true. I watched as the UPS driver threw my package which said FRAGILE on it, destroying everything inside.

    58. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as a racoon or strong breeze doesn't jostle anything and burn down the house...

    59. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, if someone comes uninvited into my house, especially if I'm not there, and takes my computer, in what point of view would he not be a thief? BTW, that would be "whose" point of view, not "who is".

    60. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guns should never be used to protect property.

      Why not?

      Depending on the state you live in, you are perfectly within your rights to shoot a thief on your property.

      In some places it is legal.

      In every place, it is immoral to use deadly force if there is no threat to any person.

      I will grant that in many situations it won't be clear whether such a threat exists.

    61. Re:Solved by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      People with guns protect packages

      ... and can shot thieves: a package values more than a life?!?!?

      The thief seems to think so if they are stealing in a castle doctrine state.

    62. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or legislation: the seller should be liable for the loss of the goods, unless they can show a receipt with a signature and a photo of who signed.

      Don't shipping companies already offer the option to add a signature requirement to the delivery of a package? So basically you want a law to force people to use that option?

    63. Re:Solved by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I would think "Hang on, I am still loading" would be best...

    64. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both are acceptable you mongo.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duct_tape

      During World War II, Revolite (then a division of Johnson & Johnson) developed an adhesive tape made from a rubber-based adhesive applied to a durable duck cloth backing. This tape resisted water and was used as sealing tape on some ammunition cases during that period.[2]

      Emphasis added.

    65. Re: Solved by slew · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of the issues in the UK was (it seems to have improved in the last year) that delivery schedules were essentially impossible for mortal humans to meet, and there was no time to hand over the package, get a signature, etc. Given that the odd pension funding requirements have put UPS under strain and UPS might be understaffed and having similar issues.

      You are making the common confusion between UPS (united parcel service, a private company) and USPS (united states postal service, a government charter company). USPS has your so-called "odd pension funding requirement", the private UPS/IBT offers a pretty standard pension for its employees. Neither pension issue seems to have a effect on staffing levels of these companies.

      Although USPS pension "pre-funding" issues have made the news, most folks are unaware that the UPS also has a completely different pension issue. Current UPS workers in the US have their pensions handled by a UPS/IBT union-partnership company, however prior to 2008, UPS outsourced the management of pensions to CSP (aka central-states-pension fund). They eventually decided to take bail on that company, but only take current employees to the new plan and a pay several billions of dollars to CSP to fund the pensions of retired employees remaining on CSP.

      Now the old pension management company CSP is becoming insolvent (because most of its clients are trucking companies that are going bankrupt and didn't pay up like UPS) and CSP is poised to slash benefits checks as part of a reorg plan sponsored by the US treasury. Note that this crisis doesn't UPS, or current workers at all, but is of course a kick in the butt for those UPS employees that retired before 2008. Unlike the coal pension fund, congress hasn't been pressured to bail out this pension fund. If the pension fund would go bankrupt and taken over by the the pension guarantee insurance, only a fraction of the pension payments are generally covered by insurance and this negotiation with US treasury is designed to hopefully avoid the BK/insurance option for pensioners.

      FWIW, the USPS pension would likely not have this insolvency issue because they are "odd-ly" forced to pre-pay their pension obligations, and not pay-as-you-go as other pensions funds. The observer is left to decide if pre-funding liabilities is an "odd" requirement or not given the fact that many industries can face an eventual future where in their growth phase, multiple employees are supporting a single pensioner, but as they shrink into obsolescence a single employee is supporting multiple pensioners. This is a just microcosm of the future effect of automation and aging populations will have on many western economies.

      When companies are "doing-well", it's always tempting to improve benefits for pensioners over the amounts actually supported by the contributions the pensioners and the company when the employees were working. The argument that companies are "doing-well" and "should-contribute-more" is always compelling (and this argument often made by unions when negotiating contracts), but of course we see that generally violates the laws of economics long term and we see the results of this lack of foresight. Ironically the people who allegedly are qualified to plan for the retirement contracts for the employees are ignoring any planning for the retirement of their industries.

      Next up on the pension crisis... Calpers (the california public employee pension fund)

    66. Re:Solved by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      We have the same system here in Auburn, WA. Packages to big for the little box AND the big box still go on the doorstep. It's a pretty shitty neighborhood,
      and I order online A LOT. Sometimes, the delivery guy will walk up onto my porch, open the screen door and sort of hide the package between the wood and the screen. Other times, the package is left on the outside corner of my deck. There is a lot of real shitty foot traffic on my street, and more than one larger package has been stolen. So far, the carrier has replaced each one, after they send a driver to "check the package" by leaving another slip of paper saying so on my door.

      Other-times, using Amazon prime, a haggard looking driver will show up in a private car, late in the evening, and hand me a package without speaking a word. I'm guessing he speaks no English, and has been on the road all day making amazon prime free(not really) next day deliveries. Works good, he gets paid and does it right.

      There are also Amazon lockers I can use in town if I was to order something really stupid off the internet. I keep saying I'm going to setup a spring loaded dog-shit-glitter name-brand-computer-box every-time something goes missing.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    67. Re:Solved by sjames · · Score: 1

      Go with concentrated skunk spray.

    68. Re:Solved by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Everybody is "a thief"... I'm one, you are one. The law is made to protect us from barbarity (that can be made with weapons, for example...) - "guns" are not the answer for nothing "civilized"...

      An armed society is a polite society. I bet if we go back to everybody carrying a sidearm, a lot of people will suddenly get a lot more "pleasant" to be around. Not only do weapons change the risk reward calculation in a big way, but they have an uncanny ability to remove the worst decision-makers from society... permanently.

      The real world aint exactly civilized. Any of-age, responsible adult who says otherwise lives in a bubble of money and culture that is "protected", as you say, from the rest of us "barbarians" here in the real world.

      Protect yourself (and your packages?) Learn to shoot, and stop fearing firearms. The life you save may be your own.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    69. Re:Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      and if hi's not stealing? "Shot first, ask later", huh?

      There's no good reason for someone to break into your car at night.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    70. Re: Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      It *should* be, IMHO, perfectly legal in all states.

      But then again, I very much respect the US having "states' rights".

      That gives the citizenry choice, to live in areas where the laws, regulation and lifestyle of an area are closer in terms to what they want for their lives.

      That's why a large Federal one-size-fits-all system is not the best system.

      But I don't have a problem with shooting someone on my property, stealing or damaging my property.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    71. Re: Solved by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that at least some Americans have internalized the NRA's message, "Guns are the answer. Now, what's the question?"

      Guns should never be used to protect property. Only to protect lives when it's the last resort, after you've tried everything else humanly possible.

      Its just about numbers. If one person used a gun to protect property, 9 other people don't have to, and its a decision our society has already made. Right now, we pay civil servants to do it for us.
      Unfortunately, they've become pretty scary good at figuring out "who" shot you while taking your wallet, "where" it happened, and "why" it happened, but remain pretty bad at using their guns to stop it from happening in the first place.

      On the other hand, they are great at using those guns to protect corporate property.....

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    72. Re:Solved by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Using one of the Amazon Locker dropoff locations is pretty secure if there's one near you.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    73. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      There's no good reason for someone to break into your car at night.

      A police officer suspecting a theft can not occurs?

    74. Re:Solved by ncc74656 · · Score: 0

      a package values more than a life?!?!?

      A thief's life is of no value to me, or to society in general. If anything, a thief imposes a negative value on society: he contributes nothing useful, but takes what he wants from those who have earned what they have.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    75. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      An armed society is a polite society.

      I can think of guerrillas in Colombia and Favelas in Rio, as counter-examples

      here in the real world.

      Are US the only "real world" possible, huh? You even know other places?

      Learn to shoot

      I know how tho shoot: I've served the Army here, in Brazil, several years ago...

    76. Re:Solved by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I recommend you to watch this movie, from 2004 (twelve years ago): Dear Wendy

    77. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "UPS coming through, got a package people!!!"

      "Sounds broken"

      "It is"

      -
      Ace Ventura pet detective

    78. Re: Solved by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      maybe they thought it was Italian.

    79. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read his post? He said U.K., unless im wrong, I don't think the U.K. has a USPS. Given that it stands for United States Postal Service.

    80. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in most jurisdictions, you then get tried for murder because 1) you are not reasonably in fear for your life from a package thief, and 2) the Castle doctrine only applies if someone is trying to enter your house by force, not if they are nabbing packages form your porch or driveway and running away.

    81. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Typically the same problem for most things. The people that work in the service industries you rely on work the same work hours as everyone else. Expecting someone to be home during business hours is dumb: *They never will be* They'll be at work. The only time this changes is if they're married, but their spouse probably works business hours too. *If* they have sufficiently old enough kids then they might stand some chance but that means only 45-55 year old married couples can successfully receive packages.

      Dumb as a bag of spanners. It's broken by design.

    82. Re:Solved by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      With UPS I can go to the website and have deliveries held at the local service center.

      If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't even be able to use them. Fedex you can only do that if the sender paid extra!(!!!!)

      Unfortunately where I live currently is a nice house with a lot of low income foot traffic passing by, and any packages left on a porch in this neighborhood will disappear within minutes. I had to stop buying from Newegg entirely, because they just don't offer good shipping where I'm confident I'll receive the package. They do use the Fedex service, but they can't promise it will be available on all orders; you might, after placing your order, find out it can't be held for pickup! They don't list what products that would happen to, so when they put that warning up I have to assume it covers whatever I would be ordering. I'm normally an optimist, but if you tell me maybe it really might be all the way empty which is not half full.

      Why do companies think it is OK to leave packages out on urban doorsteps without express per-package permission from the recipient? Why are the delivery companies not 100% responsible for those losses? It makes no sense, but it does at least increase local purchases.

      Why is every "free shipping" or "-saver" shipping option one where they just leave it out for anybody? It seems to me that lower cost shipping should still be received, just slower. And wouldn't it be even cheaper for the shipping company to just let me pick it up from the nearest warehouse? Why is that such a rare service to get? It saves them money!

    83. Re:Solved by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I had that at my last place and it was great! The ones here in the US simply retain the key; there are separate keys for the carrier and the recipient. The carrier uses their key to open the box, which releases the recipient key. They place the recipient key in the correct box. Now when the recipient unlocks that box, the key stays in the lock and the box remains unlocked.

      The only problem is, only the postal service can use it. UPS and Fedex packages still get stolen off the porch.

    84. Re: Solved by slew · · Score: 1

      Did you read his post? He said U.K., unless im wrong, I don't think the U.K. has a USPS. Given that it stands for United States Postal Service.

      As a matter of fact, I did read the post. "Given that the odd pension funding requirements have put UPS under strain" and I pointed out that the UPS does *not* in fact have any "odd pension funding requirements" (even in the UK) and pointed out his confusion might be related to the USPS stuff that made the news.

      Then I went on to hash about my own political agenda about the actual UPS pension situation (in typical /. off-topic fashion).

    85. Re:Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      And in most jurisdictions, you then get tried for murder because 1) you are not reasonably in fear for your life from a package thief, and 2) the Castle doctrine only applies if someone is trying to enter your house by force, not if they are nabbing packages form your porch or driveway and running away.

      Depends on the laws of your state.

      In TX, you can pretty much shoot anyone that is illegally on your property trying to steal something.

      In many other states, like LA, your car is considered legally and extension of your home and you can defend it the same. Lots of other stand your ground law states too that have very liberal interpretations.

      The more the better I say...after awhile if thieves think they'll get shot for stealing shit, it might finally act as a deterrent.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    86. Re:Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      A police officer suspecting a theft can not occurs?

      I'm not terribly afraid of cops breaking into my car.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    87. Re:Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do companies think it is OK to leave packages out on urban doorsteps without express per-package permission from the recipient?

      Because they're either not legally responsible for packages lost or stolen due to this negligence, or not enough people pursue legal recourse to make giving a damn cheaper than not.

    88. Re:Solved by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      USPS, FedEX and UPS all drop my package, ring the bell and leave. I don't see what waiting for me to answer is going to do for me.

      What if you aren't home? If they don't wait and just dump, then your package is sitting unattended for ... hours? If they do wait and you don't answer, they can leave a note and take it with them. This "does for you" a bit more security on the package before you get it. And if you happen to be away for a few days, it "does for you" a bit of security for your home since thieves won't see the same package on your front step for three days and know you aren't home.

      Also, don't you get a notification you package has been delivered as soon as they mark that in the handheld they carry?

      Their handheld is connected to the carrier's computer system, not mine. No, I don't get a notification of delivery.

    89. Re:Solved by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      With UPS I can go to the website and have deliveries held at the local service center.

      That's only if they haven't already just left the package unattended unsecured. Once it's dropped on your front step they aren't going to come back and pick it up and hold it somewhere for you.

      The last time I checked, they wanted extra $ if you got the note and wanted them to deliver the package to a different place.

      Why do companies think it is OK to leave packages out on urban doorsteps without express per-package permission from the recipient? Why are the delivery companies not 100% responsible for those losses?

      You answered your first question in the second. AKA "because they can".

      pick it up from the nearest warehouse? Why is that such a rare service to get? It saves them money!

      It costs them warehouse space and people to man the front counter.

    90. Re:Solved by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but you're missing the point.
      Shipping price is dictated by the offer/demand balance. Carrier quota is not something I can change or alter or control as a customer. From my position as customer, I can only control the carrier I choose, and not even that's applicable at all times.
      It is normal for me to expect my parcel to arrive in my possession, intact, within the agreed amount of time, at the agreed cost. I, as a customer, am looking at a straightforward, simple process: go to website, pick product(s), add to basket, pay online, wait for parcel. everything else is outside of my control.
      Now, if a carrier comes to me and says "help me, my quota is too high and I have literally no time to deliver all parcels to everyone", I could file a complaint against the carrier company mentioning that the person who delivered my parcel said they are overworked. That's pretty much as far as I could go.

      Interestingly, no earlier than last week I was reading an article about one of the largest private postal companies from my country. Its CEO was whining that they can't find enough drivers/carriers, and they had to increase salaries to almost 350 dollars a month in certain regions (frame of reference: the average salary for my country is a bit above 400 dollars a month). The obvious solution is: increase it some more and people will come.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    91. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no good reason for someone to break into your car at night.

      I'm not terribly afraid of cops breaking into my car.

      I'm a little confused here...

    92. Re:Solved by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      My box of guns was stolen you insensitive clod!

    93. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but of course we see that generally violates the laws of economics long term ...

      Not sure what you mean by this, unless you're stating that no business/government can depend on future revenue as demanded by pay-when-it's-due pension plans. That means every business (and government, which tries to pay everything out of current revenue) using such a pension plan, is deliberately defrauding their employees. Worse, the US courts have declared that no-one is liable for unpaid pensions. (The lesson being, only work for businesses who pre-pay their pension liability.) Since old people don't disappear when their pension does, this is another instance of the US government providing corporate welfare while employees are abused.

    94. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The seller is hardly going to go along with that voluntarily. And why would they - It's their legal obligation to make as much profit as possible.

      So your "bright idea" would require regulation i.e. communism.
      --
      roman_mir

    95. Re:Solved by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      This seems weird to me. In my country, if the letter/package is small enough to fit in my mailbox (which is locked, the postman will not put letters in mailboxes that are not locked), then it is put there. If not, either the package gets delivered to my house and I have to sign for it or I get a notice and have to go to the post office to pick it up.

      Under no circumstances does the package get left unattended on the outside of the fence. Now, as my fence is relatively high (about 2 meters) compared to my neighbors, some couriers called me and asked if it was OK for them to just throw the package over the fence. Sometimes I let them (if I knew the items won't get damaged and I was coming home soon). In addition to making it difficult to access, the fence also prevents other people from seeing that the package is there (unless they saw the courier throw it), reducing the likelihood of theft.

    96. Re:Solved by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When you're having to shoot someone, you aren't going to be playing "Lone Ranger" and trying to shoot to wound....and you also don't get any "points" for trying hard things like headshot.

      My point is that if you are going to terminate someone for stealing a package, and even consider it, You really, really want to have the joy of making someone else die.

      But the issue is, do you want that clean kill, or watching the corpse quiver, or if you really are enjoying yourself, run off a couple clips, and show them that a slow painful death is the price for stealing your toilet paper.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    97. Re:Solved by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      +1 Informative

      And if you read the responses, you'll see the truth of it. I have firearms, and if it's a matter of mortality, I'll use them on another person. But unlike some people in here who I suspect have masturbated while thinking of killing someone, I sure as hell don't want to.

      But some groups really love the idea of using firearms to kill other people.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    98. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just porting firearms generates serious danger: simple stupidity can kill or cause serious injuries on people - please watch http://imdb.com/title/tt0342272/

    99. Re:Solved by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Here's a good article on this:
      http://www.latimes.com/busines...

    100. Re:Solved by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      That amazon prime guy isn't as happy as you think:
      http://www.latimes.com/busines...

    101. Re:Solved by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Guns controlled by your cell phone?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    102. Re:Solved by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, you have multiple days from when the tracking ID becomes valid until it has been sorted at your local warehouse. Once the tracking ID is valid and they have the package in their system, then you can change the delivery to local pickup. Then instead of being ready "sometime today," it is actually ready anytime after customer service opens on the same day it would have been delivered.

    103. Re:Solved by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Once the tracking ID is valid and they have the package in their system, then you can change the delivery to local pickup.

      Assuming you know the tracking number ahead of time. I have yet to be informed of the tracking number for any UPS package that was delivered to my house in the last 20 years prior to reading it off the package itself or the non-delivery notice. By then it's on the truck, and if you don't call before the local warehouse closes today it will be on the truck tomorrow, too.

    104. Re:Solved by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I can think of guerrillas in Colombia and Favelas in Rio, as counter-examples

      No, you can't, because those aren't armed societies, those are societies where gangs and criminals are well armed and the society AS A WHOLE is not.

    105. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You support state's rights?

      Then you should be opposed to federal bans on abortion, and opposed federal mandates to respect other states gun permits.

      Right? Right? Or is states rights a thing only when there is not an R after every branch?

    106. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those are societies where gangs and criminals

      Who is a criminal? Terrorists are criminals? And refugees? (refugees are treated like criminals in US...)

    107. Re: Solved by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Then you should be opposed to federal bans on abortion,

      Yup, I am opposed to that.

      ...and opposed federal mandates to respect other states gun permits.

      I think this is one thing that is analogous to states respecting other states' driver licenses....so, I'm ok with that. That is actually the sort of thing between states that the Feds do and should have some authority to help regulate.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    108. Re:Solved by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      lol it comes in the email from the sender. The ones that tell you when your product shipped.

      I'll bet your email history is filled with exactly the information you don't think you received! For example, you've never made a single purchase from amazon or newegg. It is possible, maybe 100% of your online purchases are from individuals off ebay, and 100% of them are doing it part time and don't have customer service? Maybe so! Certainly possible, however unlikely. Less likely than being clueless, however.

      One reason why they always send you that email is that here in the US you're not allowed to charge people credit cards for most mail-order items (people get confused here, but when you order physical deliverables online, that is mail order) you have to wait until you ship the item to charge the card. It is just better customer service to send you an email that says, "Your item has shipped!" than to send one saying, "your card has been charged," but for high-information customers they might need that notice. And creating their shipping label and moving it to their shipping department is usually enough for their billing department to be allowed to consider it shipped; that's why all the retailers do this the same, and why it is so easy and pervasive for them to put the tracking code in that email; it actually proves that they charged your card at the right time! That's also why you "always" have to wait a few hours from when you receive the tracking code before you can actually track it on the courier's site.

    109. Re:Solved by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      lol it comes in the email from the sender.

      I'll save the time of replying to your repeated asinine assumptions point by amazingly ignorant point by saying this: UPS carries packages when people pay them to. Sometimes it's the sender who is paying. Sometimes the sender doesn't have the recipient's email address. Sometimes the sender wants the package to be a surprise.

      You assume I've never ordered anything from any "mail order" (thanks for the lecture on what that phrase means, by the way) because I've never gotten advance notice for anything shipped to my house. Perhaps you are unaware of the generosity of some employers in allowing personal packages through the work receiving department -- which is how I ALWAYS have things delivered when I order them. (It would take a special kind of ignorance to not know about such an option since it has been mentioned in this thread many times already, however.)

      So, I'll repeat what I said -- your claim that you can go to a website and have things held at the sorting facility only works if you have the tracking number before the first delivery attempt is made. That emphasized bit is not always true. It is amazingly difficult to have UPS hold a package at their facility (10 miles away) AFTER they have already broken open my front screen door and hidden it there, for example.

      So, I'm glad that in your little bit of the world you never get anything you haven't paid someone else to send to you, and that they always send you the tracking info ahead of time, but your little bit of the world isn't how it works everywhere else. Your instructions on how to solve the problem of UPS simply dropping things on your front step or sidewalk doesn't solve the problem for everyone else.

    110. Re: Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rhetorical, right?

    111. Re:Solved by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      LOL it sounds like you're getting shit service where you don't have to because you want an extra human to be in the loop and have to fuck around with your orders.

      You seem logic-challenged. You're just attempting a "so are you" without noticing that it isn't the same thing. I talked about the existence of a mitigation strategy for package theft that often works with one carrier, but is also often unavailable with certain merchants or carriers. You replied to me and challenged what I was saying and denying that it is normal to be able to access shipment tracking. To support this you denied ever having received a tracking number! But it turns out that's because you use concierge and have relationships with people where even when they're sending you a package they're not going to try to interact with you first. But that in no way refutes that when you order something with UPS, you can have it held for pickup at the local warehouse. If you use concierge for everything, that's nice, you don't order things. You use concierge but you can't be bothered to use a private mail box address?!? That is a really pathetic combination of elitist helplessness and cheapness.

  2. The simplest solution would be by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    to get a PO box, and have all packages shipped to you there. Its 100% secure, nobody but you can get your package. And USPS shipping is usually less expensive than other options.

    The only problems are:

    - many companies have exclusive contracts with shipping carriers that cannot deliver to PO boxes, and
    - many companies refuse to ship to PO boxes even if they do offer USPS shipping, possibly out of obsolete paranoia.

    1. Re: The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      According to my local post office, if you want UPS or FedEx to deliver to a PO Box, just address the package to the street address of the post office with your box as an apartment number, and it will be delivered to you. I've been to scared of losing a package to try this myself though.

    2. Re: The simplest solution would be by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 2

      I use street addressing feature and it is very effective. The only thing you have to pay attention to is the length of the address. The safest thing to do is put the street address on one line and the unit number on another line. I only had a problem once when a shipper truncated the address line and the unit number was cut off. The post office did a return to sender and the shipper claims he never got the package back and would not provide a refund.

  3. Old Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trick I picked up in the Marines ambush the thief with whatever means are available to you. Down here in the swamp country that could be anything from alligator to M4 carbine. They work well. Happy holidays to all.

  4. And this is why by Pollux · · Score: 2

    I'm a fan of the USPS.

    They make sure the package gets in your hands. If you're not home, they leave a ticket in your mailbox to pickup the package at the office, which is far less inconvenient then having a package stolen.

    And if it's small enough to fit in a mailbox, sure, someone might take it. But it's a federal offense. And it's far less likely to happen when potential thieves can't see what's inside, as opposed to an inviting box sitting on one's doorstep.

    Seriously, why did this even become a thing? Twenty years ago, I remember when a package that came by UPS or Fedex always had to be signed for and was never left on a doorstep.

    1. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a fan of the USPS.

      They make sure the package gets in your hands. If you're not home, they leave a ticket in your mailbox to pickup the package at the office, which is far less inconvenient then having a package stolen.

      This is particularly fun when the delivery company's office is further away, and has shorter opening hours, than the company that sent you the package.

    2. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope - USPS leaves packages on our front porch.

    3. Re:And this is why by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      They have deadlines to get a package to a door and be on their way. That's why sometimes they just leave a sticky on the door even though I'm sitting in the living room watching them scurry up, stick it to the door, and be gone before I can get to the door. They're behind schedule.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    4. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole premise of fighting package theft with technology is just a form of cost externalization to the customers. The delivery companies try to avoid warehouse costs to their very last breath, so they piss on their customers safety. In my corner of the globe, if I don't personally sing the package on the door, I have to visit the local post office and show my government issued ID to sign off the package. Automated post offices in supermarkets, with electronic receipts or access codes are also a solution for this delivery/warehouse problem, which shouldn't be a problem at all.

    5. Re: And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Had one yesterday on Sunday in fact. Delivered to my front door while I was home. No doorbell. Just dropped the package and left. Quite possible this is how amazon has instructed them too since that is who their Sunday delivery contract is with

    6. Re:And this is why by JeffOwl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      USPS left a card in my mailbox for me to fill out with delivery preferences like : only leave with a person, leave on the porch, leave with X neighbor, hold at the office,

    7. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it is insured. USPS almost always leaves packages on my front porch when no-one is home. It wouldn't surprise me if there are certain neighborhoods that are flagged as higher risk where they will never simply leave a package.

      UPS, on the other hand, once I get a message with tracking number that a package is in transit, I can go to the UPS web site and divert the package to a nearby UPS store and pick it up later.

      20 years ago was no different, they only required a signature if the package was insured.

    8. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago my wife's father was ill. She went down to take care of him. I was working at a job where I traveled often so she took the dog. It turned out she left the heartworm pills and I mailed them. When the letter arrived, it was taped shut, the blister packs were there but open. The medicen was gone. I don't think there was enough info for anyone to tell what kind of medicine it was. So somewhere in central Florida, there is a mail man out there hopped up on heartworm pills.

      I have also had a child's music CD stolen in the mail. A senseless crime if there ever was.

    9. Re:And this is why by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      I think, more generally speaking, driver release is the problem.

      I used to drive for UPS and we had specific rules about where we were allowed to driver release and where we needed to get a signature.

      The rules used to be:

      1. Air packages (Next day, next day AM, 2nd day and 3 day select) were not driver releasable ever
      2. Commercial buildings were not driver releasable (including apt buildings)
      3. Residences were driver releasable (unless the customer specifically indicated otherwise in the handling notes) but at the driver's discretion, however, the rule here is that the package needed to be delivered to the back door, garage, breezeway or somewhere out of sight from the street.

      So, in order to not get your package stolen, you would either need to get your package delivered to you work address, order using an Air shipping method, or state "no driver release" on the handling instructions.

      The problem is that with the rise of online shopping, people always want the driver to release the package without a signature. So people will end up choosing a shipper with the more lax rules which then lowers the tide for all delivery services.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:And this is why by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      In my corner of the globe, if I don't personally sing the package on the door, I have to visit the local post office and show my government issued ID

      That might work for you, but wouldn't that horribly discriminate against mute and tone-deaf people?

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    11. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always feel guilty about it but living in an apartment when I have things shipped to my address I leave a note on the door for them to leave it at the office. I know they have carried it all the way around the building to my door but I have no way of placing permamnet instructions to always leave it at the office without purchasing some sort of frequent shipee plan from UPS.

      https://www.ups.com/mychoice/features/

      They do allow some things for free but changing the delivery address or upgrading from surepost costs money each time unless you pay 40 dollars a year

    12. Re:And this is why by doom · · Score: 1

      Pollux wrote:

      I'm a fan of the USPS.

      Yup. They do their best to get it into your hands-- they don't just abandon it outside and hope for the best-- and if they miss you, you get the package at a convenient post office located nearby, and they have a lot of them (yes, "brick and mortar", how pass).

      This whole issue reminds me of the recurrent claims that some latest fad technology is so much more faster than an RDBMS-- they're "faster" because they're not doing as much for you, but there's reasons RDBMS do what they do to preserve data integrity...

    13. Re:And this is why by doom · · Score: 1

      You know what's really fun? I've had UPS delievery refuse to leave a package on my doorstep in West Oakland-- there are limits even to their stupidity-- and take it back to the central shipping office way over at the Oakland Airport. They gave me only a few days to get over there and pick it up before it would be returned to sender.

      I know this is a wild and crazy idea, but if the place that's shipping to you is actually closer that your local post office... why didn't you just go and pick it up there?

      Seriously gang: tradeoffs. Either you run a recieving office with someone on staff during business hours, you send you packages to your work place presuming they have a recieving office, or you just use something like the USPS with a place nearby you can pick up missed deliveries.

      What you don't do is insist on using a delivery service that abandons your packages outside and then act shocked when they get stolen.

    14. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One has to raise the music every once in a while for the postal mistakes, if only to avoid going postal.

    15. Re:And this is why by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Well, it is probably a little different depending on where you live and who is delivering, but as a UPS driver, I would always hit the office first when it came to apartment buildings.

      At UPS, they take driver efficiency to a level you would probably be surprised at. Down to how you fasten your seat belt when you get in and out of the truck. So, hunting around for an apartment door is about the most inefficient thing you could do. Better to leave it in the office and if the office is closed or the building doesn't have one, slap a NDR up on the door. That is, unless the apartment building is just like a quad or something small like that.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    16. Re:And this is why by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I used to drive for UPS ... the rule here is that the package needed to be delivered to the back door, garage, breezeway or somewhere out of sight from the street.

      My pager company sent me a letter saying they were changing out the paging system and they were sending me a new one. After a couple of months went by I remembered that letter and called them. They said it has been sent a couple of months earlier. I had seen nothing. They sent another one, and that's when I found the first one. I came home a few days later and saw my front screen door ajar. Sure enough, in between the screen door and the main door I found two packages from the pager company. The UPS driver a few months prior had pried open a locked screen door and hidden the first pager there. Then he stuffed the second pager in with the first and they didn't both fit. That's the only reason I found either package. Thanks, UPS.

      Another UPS driver left a package hidden around a corner with no note that he had done so. During the next week or so it rained, so when I found the box of red peppers I actually found a box of fuzzy green peppers. Thanks, UPS.

      I did the paperwork for the lost first pager, and included the fact that the driver had broken into my house, and ever since they've not left anything unattended. Unfortunately, the closest UPS facility is ten miles away, so I got the pleasure of making a 20 mile round trip for an Amazon gift card that Amazon chose to ship via UPS instead of USPS. Thanks, Amazon.

      The problem is that with the rise of online shopping, people always want the driver to release the package without a signature.

      I want the driver to deliver the package, not just leave it somewhere convenient to him but completely hidden from me. That includes not leaving it sitting unattended and unsecured on my front step, because I don't consider that "delivery".

      Before you lecture me that I should have my packages delivered somewhere else, I do. It's the unanticipated packages (like the pager) that show up and cause problems.

    17. Re:And this is why by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      If you're not home, they leave a ticket in your mailbox to pickup the package at the office, which is far less inconvenient then having a package stolen.

      This must vary, because I have never seen them do that. Unless the sender requested a signature, they put it int the mailbox or leave it on the front doorstep, just like every other carrier.

    18. Re:And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >hold at the office...

      Yes, that form is very valuable and perfectly useful. Unfortunately, the 'hurried' postal worker will drop box & run. Especially during the holiday season. Especially. I have received these slips on non-holidays, and not during the busiest part of the season. With predictable results of the 'hurried' days: my packages are stolen.

    19. Re:And this is why by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      you send you packages to your work place

      This is a very simple, very effective solution to the problem. Cheap stuff goes to my house for the convenience. Anything valuable is sent to the office. Doesn't work for everyone, but if you have an office to send it to, it's a really simple solution.

    20. Re:And this is why by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I don't know why more people don't have things delivered to work. If you have an office job, send it there. Someone will sign for it, it will get taken to your desk, and you don't have to worry. I've done this for about 8 years, and it works perfectly.

    21. Re:And this is why by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ha, I have seen them leave them near the front door (sometimes not that close) and not ringing the doorbell. It sucks. Hence, the security cameras to record.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  5. oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I see the US has the same problem as other places, you can have all the fanciest video surveillance installed around your house. The police still doesn't give a shit. Unless you are really rich.

  6. Signed delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my country packages are only given to you if you show ID and sign a reception document.

    Technology involved:
    - paper
    - pen
    - human interaction

    Way to defeat said technology:
    - ID theft followed by monitoring carefully when the postman comes to the house / or postman counterfeiting reception document himself (easy enough to prove the signature is not legit unless he is good at faking it). [too much energy expenditure for petty thieves]

  7. Ok then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sniper rifle.

  8. Re:The simplest solution would be by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

    to get a PO box, and have all packages shipped to you there. Its 100% secure, nobody but you can get your package. And USPS shipping is usually less expensive than other options.

    The only problems are:

    - many companies have exclusive contracts with shipping carriers that cannot deliver to PO boxes, and - many companies refuse to ship to PO boxes even if they do offer USPS shipping, possibly out of obsolete paranoia.

    This. It is extremely uncommon for a delivery service to leave parcels on doorsteps in England and Australia because someone might pass it and thing "I'll have that".

    In Australia if you cant have someone present for the delivery, you'll have to pick it up from a Distribution Centre or Post Office. In the UK they might leave it with a neighbour.

    Smart door locks are not the solution as they just expose your home to burglary. In fact like the parent poster pointed out, a solution already exists. This kind of thing just screams "solution looking for a problem".

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Easy: don't let distance retailers leave parcels on your doorstep!

    Here in the UK, if a parcel is on your doorstep and gets stolen, it's still the retailers responsibility. Also, many large employers will let you receive parcels at your place of work, so they're received by a human into a secure building. Your neighbours can do the same thing for you if you have some you talk to (and are home when you're not). Larger apartment blocks have a conceirge. Most places I've ever worked at least have let me work at home for a day to receive deliveries. Amazon have 'Amazon Lockers' (as do a few others), and some other retailers have small shop fronts at stations and whatnot where you can 'click and collect'. I'm not sure if it died off due to disuse, but there used to be a chain called 'doddle' (funded by our rail companies of all things) that did collection and delivery services. Then my least favourite, but occasionally used option: saturday delivery. If all else fails, most couriers here will take the parcel back to their base (which is invariably a bit of a distance away) so you can pick it up from there.

    Honestly, this isn't that hard.

    1. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've failed to take "most couriers are lazy, incompetent and/or overworked/underpaid" into account. Given detailed instructions and the person being in I've had multiple failed deliveries due to the courier being too damn stupid to survive in the wild. Or they've still managed to leave it outside the wrong address, or it's vanished without trace. Couriers are one of the least reliable services imaginable.

    2. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can also get locking delivery boxes. They are basically large mailboxes that packages can fit into, which auto lock once the package is deposited so it can't be removed by anyone but the owner. The Panasonic ones have a time-coded barcode that the delivery person can scan in lieu of a signature too.

      Every place I have ever worked allowed packages to be delivered there though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work 10-12 hours a day 7 days a week and do not have control over delivery times. Amazon Locker isn't in my small town and my job cannot be done offsite. 2 packages stolen since Black Friday sales. Not so simple.

    4. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      You've failed to take "most couriers are lazy, incompetent and/or overworked/underpaid" into account. Given detailed instructions and the person being in I've had multiple failed deliveries due to the courier being too damn stupid to survive in the wild. Or they've still managed to leave it outside the wrong address, or it's vanished without trace. Couriers are one of the least reliable services imaginable.

      Years and years ago I read a forum post by a guy who had some serious issues with some courier company. He was convinced they were deliberately damaging his shipments after he got a string of damaged packages. So one day he flipped (not sure if I recall correctly but I vaguely recall something abut him ordering a vintage vinyl record which, when it arrived, had been neatly folded over and pushed through his mail slot). He went to a hunting-goods store, got several glass bottles full of something called 'Moose Piss' (apparently this is a very very pungent product), packed the stuff into a box, covered it with 'Fragile' stickers and sent it to his father's house. Not surprisingly the package disappeared in transit. He then spent several days amusing himself by giving the courier service a hard time about how he didn't want to be compensated for the loss, he wanted his damn package back. So you see, you can have fun with these bozos too.

    5. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      What would be nice would be an option to have the parcel delivered to a local shop and then pick up from there. The shop should be more than happy because you'll probably buy something whilst you are picking up your parcel anyway.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    6. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Okind · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, if a parcel is on your doorstep and gets stolen, it's still the retailers responsibility.

      This is the law in The Netherlands as well. In fact, in The Netherlands the sender/retailer is responsible (and liable) for delivery to you. If you don't receive the parcel, it has not been delivered. This includes stops in between like a parcel service, but also your neighbours! If the parcel service looses your parcel, or if the neighbour decides to give it to a nephew, the parcel has not been delivered to you and the sender/retailer is liable for the loss.

    7. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by gatkinso · · Score: 1
      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    8. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Also, many large employers will let you receive parcels at your place of work, so they're received by a human into a secure building.

      So do many small ones. I have most of my packages delivered to me at work because my driveway is basically impossible for a delivery truck to traverse in bad weather plus they tend to leave packages out in the weather by my garage instead of on my covered porch. Most employers are pretty cool about this sort of thing if you ask. Obviously not an option for everyone but it can be a good alternative.

    9. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 1

      UPS do exactly this here (as do some others, actually) - they signed up a bunch of small corner-shop type places and you can go there to pick up your parcel.

    10. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 1

      It all hangs on this: if the retailer is responsible for the sale all way until it reaches *your* hands, then it's simple. If the problem is yours as soon as the retailer hands it to the courier then you're out of luck - talk to your law makers.

      The market will invent all kinds of ways for you to get your stuff if correctly motivated. It really isn't that hard.

    11. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Agreed - but if the delivery remains the retailers responsibility until the parcel is in your hands, then the retailer will (eventually) pick better couriers.

      FWIW, we've had some really lovely couriers delivering our stuff. I've had my share of numpties and possibly-stealing-my-parcels types too, but senders catch on to losses pretty quickly, so they get rooted out reasonably quickly (or else buy your stuff from someone else!).

    12. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. I'm in Italy and if we're not here to sign for the package, they'll either leave it at one of the businesses or call us on the phone to ask what they should do. Barring that, they try again later or make us pick it up at their office.

      This is another problem that primarily exists in America, because America is too special to solve it like every other first-world country.

    13. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, most of your solutions are regional and/or situational.

      Here in the UK, if a parcel is on your doorstep and gets stolen, it's still the retailers responsibility.
      Here in the United States, it is not.

      many large employers will let you receive parcels at your place of work
      Some do, and some do not.

      Your neighbours can do the same thing for you
      So, you actually know your neighbors and... talk to them? I've actually never seen my neighbors. I assume someone lives there though.

      Larger apartment blocks have a conceirge.
      Yeah, here in the States, larger apartment complexes generally have what's called a clubhouse and will receive packages on your behalf if instructed. But not everyone who lives in an apartment lives in such a complex.

      Most places I've ever worked at least have let me work at home for a day to receive deliveries.
      That's certainly true where I work, but my guess is, and this is really generalizing/stereotyping, that people who live in areas where package theft is a big problem also do not work for companies that allow for that.

      Amazon lockers
      I live in a large(ish) U.S. city with a population just under 1 million in the city-proper. There is exactly one Amazon locker location, and it is 20 km (I'm a giver) from downtown.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    14. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Here in the UK, if a parcel is on your doorstep and gets stolen, it's still the retailers responsibility.

      In Canada and the US, it is the package delivery service's responsibility if the package was not signed for. The exceptions to this are if the sender indicated that no signature is required (they never do this) or if you have signed an agreement in person with UPS/FedEx/etc to authorize drop off without a signature (in which case the agreement specifies it is your fault if the package is stolen).

      You can tell if a company has signed such an agreement as they get a barcode sticker for UPS/FedEx/etc to scan in lieu of a signature. The barcode goes at the dropoff point.

      I have had packages I sent out stolen and insurance pays for them, or UPS pays for them, depends on the situation.

      As for real mail, stealing that is a federal crime with extreme penalties. Some people still do that... So my mail lady keeps all the packages that don't fit in my mailbox at the post office for me. Also, again, if a signature is required, they keep it at the post office and leave a note instead (she's too busy to knock, apparently).

    15. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Personal best, a 40k replacement part for work signature required etc (cisco 6500 sup). UPS leaves it on a neighbors back door no idea who no signature etc. I call and get the no he delivered it to you for 30 minutes etc. The neighbor ended up dropping it off still dont know who was winter and the cctv never got a good shot of his face.

      I wonder what the driver got for not getting a signature and miss delivering a package insured for over 40k.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    16. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 2

      Your first point is the crux of the issue - fix that, and the rest really is easy. I can receive a parcel in about a dozen different ways, none of which involve leaving it on the doorstep (although we have low crime here, so I'm happy for them to do that with most deliveries).

      As for your neighbours - I can sympathise, as it's much the same in London. I used to live in Brixton (not known for it's safety and low crime!) but knew a few of the neighbours by site - I wasn't going to invite them over for a drink, but would happily take parcels for them, as indeed they did for us. The best tip someone gave me was to (occasionally) just hang around outside your house - maybe just drink a cuppa, have a smoke or whatever. In about 30 minutes you'll see all sorts of comings and goings, and best of all, your neighbours will notice you too.

    17. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Since we seem to be going around in circles a bit here, I'll reply to my own post...

      Making it the retailers problem until it reaches *your* hands means retailers are motivated to provide ways to get the parcel delivered and via good couriers who aren't likely to do stupid things (like leave parcels in plain site in bad neighbourhoods). It seems the US is somewhat alone in this regards - most European (and maybe elsewhere) countries seem to do something like this. To demonstrate how the invisible hand of the market works, here are most of the ways I could receive a parcel:

      1) Left on the doorstep by the courier (if in a suitably safe neighbourhood - and yes, the courier makes that choice reasonably correctly)
      2) Left with a neighbour
      3) Left in a 'safe place' of my choosing (eg. over the side gate, behind the bins or whatever)
      4) Free redelivery the next day (or day of my choosing)
      5) Pick up from the courier's depot (usually a bit of a distance from my house though, unless it's Royal Mail in which case it's the local post office)
      6) Pick up from a local vendor-neutral 'locker' service, often in small corner shops, or Amazon have their own in a few locations
      7) Delivered to 'click and collect' location (eg. concession in a station, or another property somewhere)
      8) Delivered to work
      9) Saturday delivery
      10) Timed delivery during the week (1 hour timeslot)
      11) Work from home and wait for it to be delivered at whatever time it may show up

      Some of these cost more (eg. saturday or timed deliveries), but the rest are all part of the delivery cost, and things like redelivery are offered by (as far as I know) all couriers.

      So "leave it on the doorstep" really isn't the only option - and isn't much of an option if you live in inner-city areas, or some higher crime areas. Thankfully, there are loads of other ways to get the exact same parcel, and usually at no extra cost. You get these when the retailer and courier are correctly motivated. Talk to your law makers if they're not.

    18. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by mlts · · Score: 1

      This is probably the best solution out there.

      I wish someone could invent a lock mechanism that would have two parts. A standardized lever key (or a HID style keyfob) for the delivery people (so only one key is needed for all mailboxes), and a unique key or code for the individual. Or, perhaps a system like a KNOX box, where a key to the storage bin is kept in lock box that only the delivery person has access to.

    19. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, this isn't that hard.

      Apparently, it is. I used to work at a warehouse that shipped Class 2 Pharmaceuticals (Hydrocode, Xanax, etc...). We sent all of them "Addressee Signature Required". For packages sent to California, we were required to keep records of the proof of delivery receipts, so we got a chance to look at a lot of them. A good ten percent either said stuff like "left with girl", or had no signature at all.

    20. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I work 10-12 hours a day 7 days a week "

      Man, where do you find the time to whine on Slashdot? Get back to work!

    21. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      The Crux of the issue is that Thieving is considered "petty" crime, and isn't really prosecuted. The thieves know that the chances of getting caught are slim to none. And even if caught, the penalty is just a blip on the clock and then they are back at it again 30 seconds after they get off. The worst part is, that even if you catch them in the act, there is little a citizen can do to stop them without being in more trouble than the original thieving.

      Change the view, change the punishment, change the nature of the crime. Too many criminal sympathizers out there though, so that isn't going to happen.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    22. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon do this.

    23. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So TSA style locks where the easily leaked master key is available to any temporary worker ever. There are two solutions:
      1) Live in a nicer place, without meth head style thieves
      2) buy your own package locker or mailbox of sufficient size.

    24. Re: Do like them thar foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hellow, fellow AC. Yes, it isn't a 100% secure idea, so it should be tossed. We understand that. Firewalls are not 100% secure so they should be tossed. In fact, all locks on all doors can be picked or smashed through, so they shouldn't be used. There is no gray, only black and white of working 100% or 0.

      Sarcasm aside, I've gotten the most stuff swiped in an area where the houses are going for seven digits. It doesn't take much for people to drive by, see packages in people's yard, grab them (wearing a hoodie so the doorbell cameras don't catch much), and be off. A locking bin idea, even though it isn't completely theft-proof reduces the opportunistic thefts. Yes, someone can take an angle grinder to the container, but what that does is go into felony-hard territory and actually get the police to bother doing something since it is considered a B&E. It also removes the thief's greatest ally -- swiftness.

      A TSA style lock is better than no lock.

    25. Re:Do like them thar foreigners by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      There should be a point system that scales the punishment according to how many crimes they've committed. Steal once? They should get a slap on the wrist. Steal a hundred times? They need to be locked away for a long time.

  10. Betteridge's law of headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betteridge's law of headlines applies: the answer is, quite simply, "No".

  11. Yet another gadget to sell to gullible people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Shit happens. Think for yourselves once whether the 1:10000 chance of having a package snagged is worth the investment (yes, I've skimmed TFA, and all those numbers seem pulled out of someone's ass, mixing fears ("creates a real worry that packages left on the doorstep will be stolen (53%)") with meaningless statistics ("
    stolen during the day when homeowners are out (74%)"). No wonder, it's just an ad (in ads and in politics, post-factual seems to be OK).

    I'd say most of the time it ain't. Unless you're getting significantly more than 200 pkgs/year. For me, it definitely ain't.

    Kinda the theft insurance my bike dealers tried to sell me each and every time I bought one (my last dealer was an exception, that's why I stayed a loyal customer of hers). Once I noticed that (a) they pay the value of the new bike *minus* devaluation (i.e. not nearly enough to pay a new one) and (b) all the added hassle to recover even that, I just found out it's not worth it.

    But hey, whatever creates trade.

  12. Neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Make friends with your neighbors, do each other favors like accepting packages when we and they are out. Build community spirit.

    1. Re:Neighbors by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      So the delivery person has to go next door to deliver a package now? What if that person isn't home? The next door? How much time do you think that will add to delivery times?

    2. Re:Neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK this happens often. I guess it adds maybe a minute to their delivery time and if the neighbour isn't home they normally take it back to the depot and it's up to me to either collect it or rearrange delivery.

    3. Re:Neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are weird. This is normal the world over and yet you try to imagine reasons why something so common place and trivial to do, can't work!

      In my house, for signed packages, he looks around for a car in the drive and delivers it there. My neighbors are friends, they'll all handle it.
      For postal packages that are unsigned, they'll take it off the step, keep it safe and drop it in to me when I get home.

      When a stranger comes around and starts looking at houses, they notice because they know who their neighbors are, and we call take care of each other, each others houses, each others packages.... community spirit!

  13. Ring by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    Maybe that guy should have bought the Ring 2.0 that shoots lasers at the thieves.

    1. Re:Ring by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I hear this Ring Video Doorbell ad where they claim you can scare off package thieves. Anybody tried that out - does it really work?

    2. Re:Ring by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The crooks in my area would probably steal the doorbell.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  14. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you are proposing that I don't ship my home deliveries to my home? How about just not ordering anything then and buying is stores.

  15. Solutions available in this country : by RockDoctor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    - Various "locker" countries. Lockers at many locations, often post offices, petrol stations, 24-hour shops. After selecting a bank of lockers which is convenient (e.g. on your way home to/from work), the delivery driver gets the location and a code for sealing the locker ; the recipient gets a code for opening the locker ; the shop keeper/ station manager etc has nothing to do unless there's a dispute, but they get a rental fee. PROBLEM : multiple companies. NEAREST to me : 2 locations in my city of < 10000 people.

    - At least one "warehouse chain" (no store as such, just a warehouse ; you select from the catalogue or online, pay, and the goods are brought to you at front-of-warehouse) leverage their existing delivery network for people to collect goods from their chosen store. PROBLEM : limited number of stores. NEAREST : six miles from me, but I'm often there anyway. Another one 10 miles away in a different direction..

    - Locker by front door : bolt a weatherproof locker by your front door. Close it with a programmable combination lock. Set code on lock, send code to delivery company, lock locker, put paper seal on locker. When you get home, unlock locker, inspect goods. Reverse works for collecting returns. Change lock code for next delivery. PROBLEM : might be too small, might be ugly, these are your problems. NEAREST : I've made these temporarily - metal locker secured by chain through letter box.

    But to be honest, the "card through the door and collect item from post office" generally works fine for me.

    This is not a problem that really need sophisticated technology. Just a little of that rarest of commodities - common sense.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    1. Re:Solutions available in this country : by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      No need for a programmable combo lock. The locker could simply have a door like a public mail box in the US.

      Not fool proof - but good enough.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Solutions available in this country : by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I don't know what a public door mailbox looks like in the US. But I do know that I have one of those post office cards on the hall table at this very moment, with the box for "too large for your letter box" ticked. Which is the common problem.

      What I used when I needed it was a box like this, with a padlock hasp welded to one of the latches, and a length of (welded-link) chain threaded through the carrying handle, both chain ends through my letter box, then the chain ends padlocked through a bike-frame in the hallway inside. Not impossible to break into, or to steal. But enough to discourage casual theft while still able to get into the house. Large enough for any deliveries I've had which weren't furniture.

      (Plus, casually leaving lumps of military hardware laying around on the driveway puts ideas into the neighbour's minds which add up to "I don't want to steal from his doorstep." Quite inaccurate, but useful nonetheless.)

      The point about the programmable (mechanical, not digital) padlock is that (1) we had them at work, for toolboxes, special supplies at remote work sites, etc,, so I could borrow a good one from Stores for a few days and (2) it's easier to email (etc) a 4-digit code than it is to email a physical key. After a time, I got a good padlock for myself, with a hasp big enough to go round a spring in the car's suspension and a box on the hasp large enough to keep the car key in. Great for SCUBA diving without frying the electronics in the car key.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  16. Modern technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's some parcel boxes, just large letter boxes, that solve the problem nicely.

    Example 1
    Example 2

    There's probably some others. Some are proprietary for certain delivery company, e.g. DHL has boxes that only DHL can deliver to.

  17. Exploding Box of Shit works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQmlUAIbcXA

    1. Re:Exploding Box of Shit works by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Yes, post this to yourself 20 times then your packages should be left

    2. Re:Exploding Box of Shit works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and achieves what? You're out of a perfectly fine box and the thief gets free shit.

  18. We need to just stop trusting people- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously the technology to stop theft has existed for 100's of years... it's called a lock.

    Get a box, put a lock on it, make sure that the delivery companies have a key, or a code... problem solved.

    The same thing can stop mail thefts, should that box that now has a lock on it be a Mail box.

    Technology has solved this problem. We just failed to implement the solution in the suburbs... (my apartments all had locked mailboxes, most of them either accepted packages at the office, or had a package lockbox in the mailboxs, the postman would drop off a key or code that would let you into the bigger box should you have a package in there...)

    1. Re:We need to just stop trusting people- by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Carriers won't put the effort of putting anything in a box or unlock anything. They literally toss it stuff at your front door from a distance, it doesn't matter anyway, it's all insured. You not the sender are going to be out of money, just out of time and the carrier charges enough to cover the claims.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  19. Re: The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your package is hidden in your dustbin, unfortunately today is bin day, and your item has been collectd and crushed.

  20. Sometimes you have to be there by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Typically if I'm ordering something online, I will try to mandate that it ship via UPS or FedEx so I can obtain the tracking number. ( If necessary, I'll use the more expensive Next and 2nd Day Air options to ensure one of those two carriers are utilized ) Once I know what day the package is going to arrive, I will either telecommute or flat take the day off to ensure I take possession of the package the moment it arrives.

    If the package is trivial ( read that not expensive ) then I may not bother with it.

    However, much of the gear I purchase online is quite $$$ and will require a signature upon arrival anyway, so someone has to be there regardless. It never fails, if you don't stay home to catch it, they'll show up before you get off work. If you DO stay home to catch it, they don't show up until well after you would have got off work :|

    For those situations, there isn't any technology that will help.

    1. Re:Sometimes you have to be there by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you hold an office job. Why can't you just have your stuff shipped there? That's what I, and all my coworkers, do.

  21. easy fix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Normally you should sign for package deposit. Which means you have it in your hands.

    Why not a "one way" door? Or a deposit box.

    Similar to mailboxes/deposit boxes in banks.

  22. not my problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless they have a delivery note that I signed for receipt of the goods, as far a I am concerned it is not my problem.
    You think it is a good idea to leave something on my doorstep? fine, but it is you risk, not mine.

  23. Re:The simplest solution would be by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    In the UK they might leave it with a neighbour.

    The Amazon drivers here (USA) frequently leave my packages with my neighbors. It would be nice if they tried my house first, though.

    It's fair though, as they also frequently leave the neighbors packages at my house.

  24. USPS sucks at packages by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a fan of the USPS.

    Evidently you haven't had to deal with them as much as I have. USPS is clumsy and inefficient. Their workers don't work quickly and shipping anything through them is a pain in the ass. Shipping packages through USPS is generally more expensive for equivalent service to UPS or FedEx. USPS "tracking service" is generally utterly useless. It tells you that it's been shipped and that it's been delivered and nothing in between most of the time. USPS does a fine job with letters but they are the only ones allowed to handle those so it's not like there is any alternative unless you want to hire an expensive private courier.

    They make sure the package gets in your hands.

    Only if you pay them extra to do so, no different from UPS or FedEx. Ship something without requiring the recipient to sign for delivery and they will not take special measures to get it to you and only you.

    If you're not home, they leave a ticket in your mailbox to pickup the package at the office, which is far less inconvenient then having a package stolen.

    UPS and FedEx do the same thing provided you pay them to do so. Just like USPS. And speaking solely for myself, I find having to make a special trip to the post office to be a colossally bad use of my time. It's inconvenient and the postal workers at the counter take FOREVER to do anything. It's typically a half hour trip every time I go and sometimes worse. Furthermore you can have UPS or FedEx hold packages at their depot in exactly the same way if doing so makes sense.

    And if it's small enough to fit in a mailbox, sure, someone might take it. But it's a federal offense.

    "Might"? Theft from mailboxes happens all the time. It's illegal to steal a package even if it isn't in a mailbox so I'm not sure why you think thieves give a shit just because the post office is involved. I've had packages I've shipped stolen right off the back of the truck long before they even got to their destination both via UPS and via USPS.

    Twenty years ago, I remember when a package that came by UPS or Fedex always had to be signed for and was never left on a doorstep.

    Bullshit. I was shipping packages by the thousands (literally) twenty years ago and it was no different then than it is now. You can pay UPS and FedEx extra to require a signature to deliver the package or you can just tell them to drop it off and save the extra cash. Same with insuring the package. You pay them if you want the extra handling. Some areas they will not deliver to without a signature but that is not widely true and hasn't ever been true for all packages as far as I know.

    1. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Evidently you haven't had to deal with them as much as I have. USPS is clumsy and inefficient. Their workers don't work quickly and shipping anything through them is a pain in the ass. Shipping packages through USPS is generally more expensive for equivalent service to UPS or FedEx. USPS "tracking service" is generally utterly useless. It tells you that it's been shipped and that it's been delivered and nothing in between most of the time. USPS does a fine job with letters but they are the only ones allowed to handle those so it's not like there is any alternative unless you want to hire an expensive private courier.

      Anecdote time!

      My wife ships a lot of packages for her business. She recently sent a small package USPS from Chicago to Southern Indiana. She was able to track the package online, but only when the package arrived at a USPS facility. UPS and FedEX scan the packages when they arrive and depart any facility. The package was scanned at Evansville, Indiana, and then in Anchorage, Alaska! That is way out of the way! Frustrated, my wife looked into sending a new package UPS. For a package USPS chared $3 for, UPS wanted $9. However, USPS did eventually get the package to its destination.

      Moral of the story is, you get what you pay for. No, UPS and FedEx aren't always cheaper. USPS can be much cheaper, but their tracking is not nearly as good.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked for USPS as a foreign contractor I can confirm that their overall set-up is a joke even by European standards. How they manage to stay in business next to FedEx etc remains a mystery to me.

    3. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Evidently you haven't had to deal with them as much as I have. USPS is clumsy and inefficient. Their workers don't work quickly and shipping anything through them is a pain in the ass.

      The mailman who does my route has come up with a unique way to be lazy. If I get a package, certified letter, anything that needs my signature, he simply doesn't deliver it. The day before the USPS is scheduled to return the package to the sender (about two weeks), I get a slip in my mail saying the first delivery attempt was two weeks ago (on a day I was home because I work from home), no second delivery attempt was made, and that since I wasn't there on the third delivery attempt that day (also home), they will return the package/letter unless I pick it up at the post office that afternoon. Apparently all in an effort to avoid having to walk up to my door and ring my doorbell. I'm not sure why he waits until the last day to give me the notification slip. It's not like it saves him any work over giving it to me the first day.

      i've spoken with his supervisors at the Post Office branch about it twice, but it's still happening. The last time he let a certified letter (signature required) with a $7000 refund check from my mortgage refinance sit for two weeks before notifying me I had to pick it up from the branch that day.

    4. Re:USPS sucks at packages by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Theft off of the back of the truck seems way more profitable. You get a lot of packages at once. Plus if you know where the truck is coming from, you can predict whether you're stealing something of value. If it comes from the toilet paper factory, you won't rob it. If it's an electronics distributor, you have dollar signs in your eyes. Well if you are a thief you do.

    5. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was shipping packages by the thousands (literally) twenty years ago and it was no different then than it is now.

      Was it literally thousands of packages, or was it literally twenty years ago? Is the rest of your post figurative?

    6. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently you haven't had to deal with them as much as I have. USPS is clumsy and inefficient. Their workers don't work quickly and shipping anything through them is a pain in the ass. Shipping packages through USPS is generally more expensive for equivalent service to UPS or FedEx. USPS "tracking service" is generally utterly useless. It tells you that it's been shipped and that it's been delivered and nothing in between most of the time. USPS does a fine job with letters but they are the only ones allowed to handle those so it's not like there is any alternative unless you want to hire an expensive private courier.

      We've had very different experiences. Maybe it is a local thing, where literally your zip code affects your experience? Every time I've checked the USPS, it's been cheaper than UPS or FedEx, and their staff have been helpful and friendly. From the delivery perspective, they are a bit slower, but that's because there is always a line of about 2 people, as opposed to when I go to UPS or FedEx. When there is somebody waiting at UPS or FedEx, any given transaction is about the same length of time.

      My understanding is if you have a business account, then UPS and FexEx prices drop dramatically, so maybe that is what you are talking about, too?

      UPS and FedEx do the same thing provided you pay them to do so. Just like USPS. And speaking solely for myself, I find having to make a special trip to the post office to be a colossally bad use of my time. It's inconvenient and the postal workers at the counter take FOREVER to do anything. It's typically a half hour trip every time I go and sometimes worse. Furthermore you can have UPS or FedEx hold packages at their depot in exactly the same way if doing so makes sense.

      Yes, but a 30-minute round-trip to the post office certainly beats the hour+ round-trip to UPS or FedEx depots.

    7. Re:USPS sucks at packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've shipped over eleven hundred packages through the USPS and only had a problem with three.

    8. Re:USPS sucks at packages by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Fascinating. I have the exact same problem in Milpitas, CA. I have stopped having anything sent to my residence since I can't trust it. I had an expensive package from overseas get returned to sender because I couldn't make it to the post office the same day I got the slip.

      I never bothered trying to report it, I figured there would be no point. Now I have things sent to my girlfriends house or my workplace.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    9. Re:USPS sucks at packages by nasch · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that he basically can't be fired for doing a poor job because he's a federal employee, and he knows it and his bosses know it and he knows they know it. So his boss tells him to knock it off, and he says "OK Bob" and keeps on doing the bare minimum to not get fired. But that's just a guess.

  25. The technology was invented 00 years ago by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    A US mail box with its trapdoor drop.

    A simple system that is good enough.

    Won't accept large packages - but this is a limitation of any locker type system.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  26. This is called ... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    ... "Slashvertisement"

  27. Sabotage by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    Rather than wait for your packages to be delivered then stolen, start early. Say around October. Put your own package on the front step when you leave for the day.

    Inside you can fill it with dog shit or dirty diapers.

    The first time a thief takes it they'll probably think better of stopping by a second time.

    Which leads to the next step. Since that thief probably won't try again you can either rinse and repeat for the next thief or go to the next level and rig a fake package to shoot out pepper spray when opened.

    If you wanted to be really clever, have a package which uses compressed air to shoot out dog shit when opened. Or any comparable liquid.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are people out there called criminals who willingly break the law. I better go out of my way to piss them off, so they'll leave me alone."

    2. Re:Sabotage by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      If your thief had a temper you would come home to a smoking ruin or an ambush after pepper-spraying or dogshit-spraying them. They know where you live. Even shit-in-a-box seems a trifle stupid.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  28. Re:The simplest solution would be by Calydor · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Denmark and Germany they have a foolproof system, the mailman or delivery guy doesn't actuallly have the package in his truck, all he has is a pad of notices all saying "You weren't at home, go get your package at the post office tomorrow!"

    That gets REALLY awkward when you open the front door while the mailman is coming up towards it.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  29. Re:Do like them thar foreigners - PLEASE DON'T by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    My recent Amazon deliver resulted in a $1200 (exchange rate equivalent) TV being left in a shop 6 miles away.

    I knew it was on its way from the Amazon tracking, but the lovely deliver person at S**R just dropped it where it was convenient and headed on his (or her) way. I got a call from the shopkeeper who found my phone number on the label stuck to the manufacturer's carton, that said exactly what it was. Luckily, he was honest and let me know or he could have had a very nice christmas present.

    Even now, 2 weeks later, Amazon still shows the package as undelivered.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  30. Re:The simplest solution would be by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    UPS stores have what are essentially PO Boxes but are not USPS. The mailing address is often an office number at the UPS store location, so 111 any street Ofc 321.

    UPS and USPS will deliver there (not sure for fedex) and it can be used as a business address.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  31. It's an US problem only? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    United States are not the entire world (like the discussion leads me to...), you know...

    1. Re:It's an US problem only? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Most other countries leave the seller or courier liable until they get a signature, meaning they don't just leave boxes out in the open like they seem to do in the US.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:It's an US problem only? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      +1 Informative (it's the case here in Brazil)

    3. Re:It's an US problem only? by doom · · Score: 1

      Most other countries leave the seller or courier liable until they get a signature, meaning they don't just leave boxes out in the open like they seem to do in the US.

      It's really only the private delivery services that compete with the federal post office that use this abandon the package and hope for the best approach.

      This means that there's a simple fix for the problem, but that idea goes against the still-dominant ideology that The Free Market always knows best.

  32. PO boxes by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    to get a PO box, and have all packages shipped to you there.

    UPS will not deliver to PO boxes and in fact they cannot by law. Neither can FedEx, DHL, etc. Only the United States Postal Service can deliver to PO boxes. Since most of my deliveries do not come via USPS a PO box is rather useless to me. You can get a similar sort of service through places like UPS stores and they will accept packages from other couriers. Not the post office though.

    And USPS shipping is usually less expensive than other options.

    Not for equivalent service it isn't. USPS is generally more expensive and less convenient if you are paying for a similar level of service. I ship lots of packages and you can save money on postage in some cases through USPS but you generally get what you pay for.

    1. Re:PO boxes by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 2

      Not entirely true. Many post office offer street addressing as an option for your PO box. All you need to do is sign an agreement for it work. I find a USPS PO box a better option than a private PO box because I like to go to one place to get all my mail and some items cannot be delivered to a private PO box.

  33. 11 million wow that's a lot by belthize · · Score: 1

    Unless you look at the totals.

    According to what I'm sure was a rigorous study by the company wanting you to buy their widget US homeowners receive on average 27 packages per year and of those nearly 11 million are stolen. The Great Omniscient Optimal Guessing Library Engine says there are 86 Million homeowners which gives 2.3 Billion packages per year

    So the theft rate is about .5%. So the average home owner would see one theft per 8 years (assuming homogenized thieves).

     

  34. Re:The simplest solution would be by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    We've had that problem sometimes. Where my wife was home the entire day and when she opens the door (to check, not because of a doorbell ring), she sees a "you weren't at home" note. They don't even bother with the courtesy doorbell ring, just a "tag and leave." We haven't had that happen in awhile, though we have plenty of "drop package on front steps and walk off without ringing the doorbell" incidents. Luckily, Amazon sends us text messages when our packages are delivered or they might sit out there for hours and be prime package theft targets.

    (I'd love to see the looks on the thieves faces when they snatch that giant Amazon.com box only to find out it contains a big package of toilet paper!)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  35. Inconvenience of shopping online by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Shopping locally doesn't have this particular problem.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  36. Re: The simplest solution would be by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I've been to scared of losing a package to try this myself though.

    How about mailing yourself a worthless test package?

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  37. No by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You can't apply a technological fix to a human problem, especially if the human is an idiot.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. FOB and Uniform Commercial Code by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It all hangs on this: if the retailer is responsible for the sale all way until it reaches *your* hands, then it's simple. If the problem is yours as soon as the retailer hands it to the courier then you're out of luck - talk to your law makers.

    That is a negotiated agreement between buyer and seller. There are copious laws about this in the US under the Uniform Commercial Code and there are defaults if nothing else is explicitly agreed to. If you see FOB on your packing slip that details exactly who owned the product at any given time. For instance if you see FOB Destination, that means that it is owned by the retailer until you take delivery of the product. FOB Origin means that you own it the moment it leaves the shipping dock on a courier's truck.

  39. Re: The simplest solution would be by CeasedCaring · · Score: 1

    This HAS happened!

  40. huh.. isn't it the carrier responsibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amazon compensated me in 30 minutes when I complained via web feedback that I never got my item that was declared delivered.
     
      The next day I got the package via a different carrier with no trace back to amazon. I notified amazon that I did get the package and something must have happened on their end. They thanked me for my honesty and didn't even bother to reverse the refund. it's hard to get upset at the great evil internet walmart with such ridiculously satisfying customer service.

    I also live in a somewhat dodgy neighborhood; I have never lost a package. UPS faithfully follows my delivery instructions even though they are kind of a pain in the ass. A simple thing to hide the package from obvious street view.

    1. Re:huh.. isn't it the carrier responsibility? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Amazon refunds are amazing, as are their customer returns department.

      Amazon is a company that gets it right in many ways, which is why when they get it wrong, hardly anyone cares.

      Price.
      Easy-to-order.
      Tons of stock.
      Huge product variety.
      Great reliability.
      Quick delivery (stupendously quick).
      Customer service.

      Even my workplace use it "officially". I work in schools and where most state schools have to get three quotes for anything large, and have to be from a specialist retailer and not some multi-store, and everything has to be signed off and approved and then ordered months later, I've found that every independent (private) school I work for just has an Amazon account.

      Literally, 100 iPads, or PCs, or stationery, or furniture, or cables, or labels, or batteries, or garden tools, or anything, really. If you want it, you copy the link in an email to finance, after approval (usually a CC: to the right person gets that in seconds), they do a quick search, see if it looks like a decent price (if not, THEN they hunt around for something), and just click Buy. The finance department has more entries on the purchasing for Amazon than any other. In a place that spends MILLIONS each year.

      And wherever there is freedom to buy like that, they save SO MUCH money that it's just ludicrous. And it literally arrives in hours, which is amazing for those critical end-of-term things. I've literally ordered SAS hard drives on the rapid delivery and they've arrived and started resyncing in the RAID array before the end of the same day.

      You just can't beat that.

      All we need is for Amazon to sort out their working practices, and make sure their taxes are in order, and we don't really have a need for any other kind of online store. Almost everyone I speak to in similar businesses hates Amazon with a vengeance - they are basically putting everyone else out of business.

    2. Re:huh.. isn't it the carrier responsibility? by doom · · Score: 1

      ...when they get it wrong, hardly anyone cares.

      Yes, and everyone loves working in their warehouses. But y'all have a nice life.

      Me, I've always appreciated that little checkbox at bn.com to only use the USPS for my address. If you check that little box, the entire theft problem we're talking about goes away.

      You too can join the commie socialist revolution: support your local post office.

  41. I'm baffled. by gaspyy · · Score: 1

    I live in the EU.

    Whenever I make an online purchase,
    - I receive an SMS from the courier company with the delivery date and approximate time.
    - Then I get a phone call from the courier to confirm the delivery time and place, reschedule if needed.
    - I then receive the package and have to sign for delivery. Until I sign it off, there was no delivery.
    - Oh, and most retailers accept cash on delivery, so there's an extra incentive for them, as for couriers, to deliver packages successfully.

    Leaving packages on doorstep is unheard of.

    1. Re:I'm baffled. by ledow · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK.

      Despite all of the same above infrastructure, often they just throw it in your porch, out front, over the fence or behind a recycling bin, sign for it themselves and then you have hell of a time claiming for anything lost (often, retailers just absorb the cost and send you another as it's hardly worth claiming for most things).

      However, nobody accepts cash on delivery as the drivers just get robbed instead.

      More often than not, however, they deliver it to a random neighbour and put a card through the door saying which neighbour. Yes, I've had arguments with neighbours who have basically tried to claim they never took delivery.

      "when one of their packages gets left on your doorstep" is the weak link, obviously. Let's just stop doing that.

      I'm very tempted to buy a strong lockbox with a one-way door (like bank drops) so that they can deliver. But, still, if the parcel demands a signature, I often never have to give one, or I have to traipse along London to sign for it in the middle of the working day from one of their "convenient" depots.

    2. Re:I'm baffled. by niks42 · · Score: 1

      I have a particular delivery company that puts packages IN the recycling bin. Not always the brightest move, especially on Mondays when the bin collection happens.

    3. Re:I'm baffled. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I used to live in the EU - shipping is also 5-10x more expensive for shorter distances than the US. You can get a package delivered for ~$5 anywhere in the US, the same package delivered across Belgium costs $25

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:I'm baffled. by radish · · Score: 1

      That sounds incredibly inconvenient. SMS & phone call & have to be home?

      I live in the US, I get multiple packages a week delivered from all the major shippers. Unless the item is explicitly marked as "requires signature" (maybe 1 in 100) it gets left on the doorstep. Never had a single thing go missing in 10 years. Plus, 90% of what I get is from Amazon and their customer service is so good I'm 100% sure they'd fix it if something did go AWOL.

      If I did have a crime problem here I'd install a secure dropbox, having to stay home or drive to a shipping center to pick stuff up is too much hassle.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:I'm baffled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, the US also has a huge identity theft problem because standardized proof of identity is too inconvenient? :)

    6. Re:I'm baffled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bet your local basketball team sucks

  42. send it to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best trick I've learned is to have the package delivered to your work. Most employers won't have a problem with it (especially if you are IT as the receptionist will assume it's for the department). Delivery people are a lot less likely to fuck up a business delivery, especially since they have no excuse for claiming no one was there to accept it.

  43. It's not the carrier's problem by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2

    Not the seller, the courier. Leaving a package on a doorstep is no less negligent than leaving it on the side of the road and telling someone to go get it before it's stolen. This should be covered under existing law.

    The consumer has the power to fix this already: when ordering, request a "signature required" delivery. If the seller doesn't offer that, order elsewhere. Whatever you decide, it isn't the carrier's problem if you elect to assume the risk.

    1. Re:It's not the carrier's problem by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I believe that signature required is the default. Most of us have, at some point, checked a box indicating that it's okay to leave the package without a signature. The reason we do that is that thefts are very rare. Stealing a package is relatively high risk and you might not get anything of value. You come up to my house, steal a box, and find out that it's a 10lb bag of rice ordered from Amazon. You'd be better off just shoplifting it directly. At least then you get to pick the food that you steal!

    2. Re:It's not the carrier's problem by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Steal from my door when I am home and you have a lot more "risk" then getting a bag of rice...

    3. Re:It's not the carrier's problem by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Which I think means we both agree that shoplifting is a smarter criminal enterprise and hence why so few packages are actually stolen.

  44. Pretty Easy by b0bby · · Score: 1

    If something is high dollar, I have it sent to my office. Otherwise, it can be left at my door. In 20 years I haven't had a problem, so I'm not going to change my system.

    Plus, really, Amazon can have a replacement to me in a couple of days worst case.

  45. Re:The simplest solution would be by thomn8r · · Score: 2
    Its 100% secure

    Here in California at least (and I'm sure other states as well) we have a problem with postal employees pilfering certain items before they even get to your door; you'll get your envelope, but the gift cards and money will be gone.

  46. Re:The simplest solution would be by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    In Italy, they have another solution to avoid carrying packages to houses. During transit, the package gets some very slight damage to the outer packaging. Because of the damage, you have to go to the post office and open it there, so that they can see that the contents were not damaged in transit.

    The postal workers also get to see what is in your package, as they will look over your shoulder while you open it.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  47. Re:The simplest solution would be by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    UPS stores have what are essentially PO Boxes but are not USPS. The mailing address is often an office number at the UPS store location, so 111 any street Ofc 321.

    UPS and USPS will deliver there (not sure for fedex) and it can be used as a business address.

    I did this for 10 years.
    *Any* shipper can deliver to them.
    And since the store was only one mile away, it was very convenient.
    I only quit using it when new owners bought the store, promptly doubled the annual fee, then tripled it the following year.

  48. Can Packages Fight Thieve Technology w/ Consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Subject too short, sorry :)

    I mean: yay for cyclic permutation!

  49. I consider myself lucky by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I'm able to have everything delivered at my office. Safer that way.

  50. Extra layers by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Many post office offer street addressing as an option for your PO box.

    So instead of simply dropping the prohibition against delivering packages to a PO box, USPS put an additional layer of abstraction on the problem with a quasi-fake street address that points to a post office box. This is why USPS sucks. They rarely do anything the easy or efficient way.

    1. Re: Extra layers by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1

      There is no abstraction. The street address is the physical address of the post office where your PO box is located and the unit number is your PO box number. Are you complaining just for fun?

  51. $1000 for a secure parcel bin seems OTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get one in the UK for £200 (more or less $200), with a QR code that the delivery person can scan to get proof of delivery for packages requiring signature. Also, here the vendor is responsible for the item up until the customer receives it, so if it doesn't turn up the customer can demand a refund or replacement. It's therefore in the vendor's interests to ensure that their courier service handles things properly. And because vendors are in a better position to sue negligent couriers, or simply to switch to another provider, the couriers do actually handle things properly for the most part, give or take the usual asshat you get in any organisation.

    1. Re:$1000 for a secure parcel bin seems OTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there is a well-established network of collection points for most courier services (DPD, Hermes etc.) so if it's important you can just get it sent there and collect it after work. 20 years ago these were uniformly inconvenient, miles away and with crappy opening hours. Now, every other garage and late-night pharmacy has a collection point, which is ideal.

  52. Re:The simplest solution would be by fincher69 · · Score: 1

    But that kinda defeats the whole purpose. While selection is nice, one of the big selling points to ordering stuff online is that it comes to you. If I have to go pick it up, where's the advantage over just going to a brick and mortar store that carries what I need?

  53. Just use the post office by doom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look, this is getting ridiculous. If you just use the post office for package delivery, you know what happens if they can't deliver it into your hands? It goes back to your local post office, and they hold it for you-- you go by and pick it up whenever convenient. A postal worker is not just going to abandon your package on your doorstep pretending that you live in Mayberry RFD...

    This is the key thing here: UPS sucks. They don't maintain anything like the network of post offices managed by USPS, and instead they like to gamble with the safety of your packages in ways the post office simply won't.

    Blaiming the USPS for being "less efficient" is crazy: they *do more* for you. UPS cuts corners, and the result is a theft problem everyone is looking for slick technical fixes for.

    1. Re:Just use the post office by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Nope. The USPS leaves it on the porch even in my downtown area where packages are stolen very quickly.

      Don't just make up the parts you don't know.

    2. Re:Just use the post office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I tell my UPS driver where I want my package delivered? (e.g., where around the house, with a neighbor, or at another location)

      Yes, because sometimes you don't want your packages left at the front door--you may want the driver to leave them at the back door, a neighbor's house, or maybe at The UPS Store®.

      As a UPS My Choice® Member, you can request that your driver:

              Deliver your packages to another address or to The UPS Store®
              Provide specific instructions for your driver as to where you want your package left, for example back door, patio, or concierge
              Have your package delivered to your neighbor (neighbor must be within walking distance)

      https://www.ups.com/content/us/en/resources/sri/ups_my_choice_delivery_instructions.html

      You can also have UPS deliver to an "Access Point" which is a box at some convenience stores.

      You don't have to live in "Mayberry RFD" to have some kind of alternative to leaving the package on the step. I like having them leave it on the step. If most people didn't want the package left on the step, they wouldn't do it.

    3. Re:Just use the post office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever is convenient being the extremely limited hours the post office is open. On the other hand, you could just have UPS hold your package and they stay open much later so it is much more convenient for picking up packages after work. Letting them leave it at your door is a risk that you can mitigate by either ordering from some place that will easily refund you the money if something is stolen (Amazon) or having UPS hold your package for you.

  54. Re:The simplest solution would be by doom · · Score: 1

    many companies have exclusive contracts with shipping carriers that cannot deliver to PO boxes

    Yeah, but if you don't use Amazon, that problem goes away and you help make the world a better place.

    Many companies, huh? There's a remarkable inability to diagnose a problem, if the result requires one to admit y'all fucked up by making some idiotic fad the "new standard"...

  55. Re: The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ordered an ACME Model 2000 Package Thief Trap six months ago. It still hasn't arrived.

  56. Re:The simplest solution would be by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    This happens in the US too. I just missed a shipment from UPS the other day. They hold at the nearest location which in my case is a UPS store two miles up the road. USPS holds it at the post-office. Low-value items can be delivered without a signature. It's not a very profitable criminal enterprise to steal low-value packages!

  57. The best technology against thieves... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Is renting a post office box. UPS, FedEx and other carriers can ship to PO box.

  58. Once upon a time... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... when you order an item that was being shipped to your home, the delivery person rang the bell or knocked on the door. You then signed something that showed that you'd received it, and you took your package inside. Some shippers still do this. In fact, I have signed for two packages in recent weeks. If I'm not home, a note is stuck on my front door telling me that I missed the delivery and that they'll be back tomorrow. Or I can drive over to the depot, sign for the package, and bring it home.

    I'm sure someone's now thinking "Oh, that's too inconvenient!" Really? More inconvenient than have the package stolen off your front porch? Live in an apartment? Always opt for he delivery option where someone has to sign for the package. If that's too hard for ya, there's still brick-n-mortar stores.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Once upon a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More inconvenient than have the package stolen off your front porch?

      Maybe not, but the probability of the latter (despite the company who's trying to sell their solution) is negligible.

  59. Not really sure this is a problem by Solandri · · Score: 1

    There were 3.78 billion packages delivered in the U.S. in 2013. Judging by the trendline we're probably over 4 billion by now. If 10 million were stolen, that's a theft rate of about 0.25%. FedEx reports a lost package rate of 0.55%, so they're actually losing more packages during delivery than are stolen.

    125 million households in the U.S., so on average a house gets a package stolen once every 12.5 years. If you figure the average package value is $50, that's a cost of $4 per year due to theft. A small enough amount that most people would just shrug and let the retailer's/shipper's insurance take care of it rather than actively try to combat it.

  60. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have that problem if it comes FedEx, UPS it never happens.

  61. Would NOT let him IN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding me?? Let the delivery guy have access to my house ?? He could be black just like the package thieves we're trying to prevent from stealing our stuff! Think again.

  62. Nuclear Visa disupte by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    On *rare* occasions I've had products not arrive. Stolen? Delivered to wrong address? Don't care. Until I receive the product from the vendor, this is NOT my problem. Investigating failures of the vendor's delivery agent is also NOT my problem.

    Most vendors realize that delivery is not complete until they can show it was delivered. Most of them will also take the risk to ship without signature; it's more convenient for them and their customers are generally happier with it. But it's their risk. If the delivery fails, usually calling the vendor and complaining will cause them to "reship" the product and require a delivery signature. In the rare cases this doesn't work, the below has worked for me 100% of the time.

    Last time I had to do this was over a year ago, with bogus hotel charges, not package delivery. Vendor did eventually do what they were supposed to, but not before the Visa dispute. They knew they were wrong and tried to run out the clock. When the dispute went through they refunded to avoid a ding from Visa.

    The statement at the end gets Visa out of any liablity; they do NOT care. Because if you're committing fraud, the vendor can go after you.

    $Date
    $Credit Card Issuer
    $Address
    cc/
    $Vendor
    $Address

    Re: Visa $AccountNo: Dispute Transaction ID $TID

    On $Date I ordered and paid for $Product from $Vendor using Visa $AccountNo.
    The transaction ID for the purchase follows:
    $TID

    By $Date, $Vendor has failed to deliver $Product.

    On $Date I contacted $[email address or phone number], representing $Vendor.
    I explained that $Vendor has not delivered $Product after $Days and that the period to dispute the charge is running out, therefore I am following up the issue.
    $Vendor is unable to confirm they have delivered $Product to me, however $Vendor has refused to refund $Price or to agree to deliver $Product by $Date.

    I have therefore made a good$faith effort to resolve the issue with $Vendor.

    I dispute Visa charge of $Price to $Vendor. Refer to Transaction ID above.

    I affirm under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

    Signature

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  63. Claymore? by almostadnsguy · · Score: 1

    Claymores (landmines) don't need to be present. If you have to, you could fill them with paintballs. Get an alert that someone is in the area of your door and if they take anything with them trigger the device remotely. (obviously, I don't condone anyone actually do this, but I shouldn't have to say that)

  64. Insurance by jtara · · Score: 1

    Insurance. Duh.

    But many companies skip the insurance, because it is cheaper to just cover the losses themselves, IF the consumer actually insists on them doing so.

    Unless the company can prove personal (signature) or secure delivery (delivery to a locked box), it is on the sender. "Proof" that a box was left in front of a door is not sufficient.

    And of course insurance will require that a signature be obtained.

    It's just companies cheaping-out, and the lack of convenient alternatives. We need more pick-up points like Amazon Lockers, now that an increasing number of purchases are made online and delivered to the home.

    As a consumer, it is NOT YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to install security systems to catch thieves. And it is NOT YOUR RESPONSIBILITY if the package is lost. If you want to spend some $$$ on cameras and such as a CONVENIENCE so that you will not have to have packages re-shipped, go for it! Otherwise, don't bother.

    Even insured, it is the responsibility of the seller - THEY have to file the claim. But they largely don't want to be bothered. In EITHER case, if you have any trouble, start a credit-card charge-back. First, the company will threaten you, saying "oh, charge-back, we can't talk to you any more!". Then, if you insist, they will offer to replace the package once they have proof that the charge-back has been removed. If they don't follow-through, just start the charge-back again.

  65. Sounds like a job for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a job for armed drones.

  66. How stupid do you have to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to trust an IoT device to control the lock on your front door. Secure enough for a postage drop box but the main door to a house or flat .... how fucking stupid do you have to be?

    Unlike real locks, you don't have to stand in front of it until it is open.
    Give it another year or two and there will be a lot of doors unlocked to anyone with decent security knowledge.

    Fucking morons

  67. Who are these people? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    Who are these people who get packages delivered to their homes when there isn't something there to retrieve them?
    Why do these people trust that a package will sit on their doorstep for hours and no one will take it?
    What time period do they think we live in?

    I don't get the naivete.

    Almost every week I hear something through the grapevine that someone in my neighborhood had a package stolen off their porch. It's a good thing I'm not on FB or it would be hard for me not to ask the hard questions of those who have things delivered to their homes when they aren't there.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  68. You get what you pay for by sjbe · · Score: 1

    She was able to track the package online, but only when the package arrived at a USPS facility. UPS and FedEX scan the packages when they arrive and depart any facility.

    That's why USPS tracking is basically useless. Tracking updates should happen any time someone handles the package. USPS doens't have the infrastructure to bother. Technically they have "tracking" but it's pretty much worthless except for proof of delivery.

    No, UPS and FedEx aren't always cheaper.

    No not always but pretty routinely. And you tend to get what you pay for.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for by nasch · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if they slapped an RFID tag on every package, and every vehicle had a scanner that automatically updated the database when a package was put on or taken off.

  69. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pro Tip: Most deliveries go through just fine to a USPS box if you use the street address of the Post Office rather than the PO Box address format. Ex:

    Wrong:
    Joe Smith
    PO Box 12345
    Anytown, XX 09876

    Right:
    Joe Smith
    5 Main Street
    Unit 12345
    Anytown, XX 09876

    Where 5 Main Street is the actual street address of the post office.

    Source: Have PO Box. Have Amazon. Have stuff.

  70. Source of the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every year more than 10 million packages are stolen off doorsteps, according to a study by August Home Inc. -- a company which sells a "smart" door lock

    So how many are actually stolen per year, according to someone who isn't selling a solution?

  71. dye packs in the box by siamesevodka · · Score: 1

    If the police would bait some fake packages with dye packs like the bank uses it might be a deterrent. Bait a porch in an area that has been having this problem. Use surveillance cameras and put a small gps tracker in there as well. With any luck you can see him drive 2 blocks and become a blue smurf. Kind of like bait car.

  72. Re:The simplest solution would be by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    Hey man, free butt wipe is free butt wipe!

  73. ...sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a little depressing that nearly every thread so far is about how to be more inconvenienced just to keep stuff you own from being stolen. The real heart of problem is it's convenient and almost no risk to do the stealing of said items. One would think the better solution lies in making it more risky and painful for the thieves, not making it more painful for the rightful owner.

    Something as simple as being able to get real-time notifications of package movement after delivery would be pretty huge, tracking it would be even bigger. I'd bet the people stealing probably have smart phones. Some cheap component to detect movement if not disabled by the rightful owner, do a scan for the closest phone signature or something to associate with a cell phone, and you have tracking that can be used by law enforcement to find the perp, even if they ditch the box/packaging. They couldn't act on every single one, but if the pattern got big enough, and people started getting caught, it wouldn't be such a winning proposition.

    Hell, I bet even just putting a bright red sticker on the box that implies some scary tracking/identification technology would be enough to deter many of the thefts. Possibly with a reminder that it's a federal pound-you-in-the-ass crime to open someone else's mail....

     

  74. Just get it delivered to work!!! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    or a neighbor, or a friend who stays/works at home..

    Jeez, technology isn't always the solution.

  75. Re:The simplest solution would be by GNious · · Score: 1

    In Australia if you cant have someone present for the delivery, you'll have to pick it up from a Distribution Centre or Post Office.

    Heh - in Belgium they'll pre-fill the "you weren't at home" notes and just put them in your mailbox instead of ringing doorbells etc.
    Of cause, then you get the post office (yay, bepost) and the driver "forgot" to empty his van full of undelivered packages ....

  76. Troll the thieves by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    In my city, there is a rowhouse with a sign that says something like "Deliveryman: Don't even think about putting a package on my doorstep, it absolutely WILL get stolen." I want to put a fake package on that person's doorstep, with a cell phone and a stun gun. A little app would upload the coordinates and video to the internet in realtime. The resulting video would be priceless.

    *Total darkness* "Hey Bob, let's see what we got now! *tearing noises, light, a human face appears* Wow, looks like it is a cell ph...Gzzhzhzzzzzhzhzhzhzhzhzhhzhzzzzz AHHH F***K!!

  77. Re: The simplest solution would be by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    Evertime my packages are lost it has never been actually stolen. In one instance it was lost after the shipper gave it to the post office, but before it made any progress.

    I've had various shipping companies drop packages off at my neighbors. Fortunately they have been honest, albeit a little annoyed. My last package was delayed 2 days because my neighbor didn't feel like braving the cold or the rain. The funny thing is it said apt 3 and they dropped it off at a house.

    With shippers like mine who needs thieves?

  78. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Australia if you cant have someone present for the delivery, you'll have to pick it up from a Distribution Centre or Post Office. In the UK they might leave it with a neighbour.

    I wish! My experience of parcel delivery in Australia is that either:

    - if you wait at home for the package then the driver/ninja will silently slip on of those "we missed you, pick up your parcel at x" notices in the letter box (or under the door if they want to show off their true ninja stealth) when you are momentarily distracted. Certainly no doorbells will be rung, no doors will be knocked on, no leaves will be rustled...

    - if you are out on the day of delivery they will leave it on your doorstep, strategically positioned to catch the rain and maximise sight-lines from the street to your package.

    Just based on my repeated experiences. On the plus side I've never had a package stolen, which is reassuring.

  79. Common Sense? by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Use common sense! Have packages delivered to the office. Send to an Amazon delivery locker, have variable delivery times and take delivery when you're home..Got a retired person in your neighbor hood who could take delivery for a couple bucks or a friendly chat? .
    come on people - think.

  80. Here in Canada... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    UPS, DHL, and Purolator use the following routine...

    * attempt to deliver to residence
    * if an adult is not present to sign a delivery receipt, take package back to warehouse

    Some of them try 2 or 3 days. Then you have to go to their warehouse, with 2 pieces of ID, and pick up the parcel. Leaving stuff outside is stupid. In addition to theft, it can get rained/snowed on, and leaving a PC outdoors in -20 weather is not exactly healthy for electronics. Before I retired, I'd sometimes specify that they not try delivering at all, but that I'd come to their warehouse and pick up myself. One nice thing about living in a condo is that I can authorize security to accept the parcel for me, then I'd pick it up when I get home.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  81. Honeypot by countach · · Score: 1

    So why aren't the authorities mailing themselves a lot of GPS units with big batteries and pinhole cameras and prosecuting whoever takes them? Or are thefts so few that it's not worth it?

  82. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. It is extremely uncommon for a delivery service to leave parcels on doorsteps in England and Australia because someone might pass it and thing "I'll have that".

    And another poster down ...

    In Denmark and Germany they have a foolproof system, the mailman or delivery guy doesn't actuallly have the package in his truck, all he has is a pad of notices all saying "You weren't at home, go get your package at the post office tomorrow!"

    I don't own a gun but will introduce guns into the conversation. As a suburbanite of US cities, I've never, ever had a package stolen and rarely see a note whining I'm not at home.

    They just leave the damn package and it's there when I return.

    Done.

    Even when living in townhouses.

    How is this such a problem in Europe? What the fuck are you doing so wrong? Is it guns? I'm thinking you need more guns.

  83. Don't have it delivered to your house by kuzb · · Score: 1

    It's really simple. Have the package redirected to a secure drop location for pickup. It's dumb to have things left on your doorstep.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  84. Re:The simplest solution would be by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    I get all of my packages delivered to my workplace, it's so much more convenient.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  85. The Post Office sucks by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If you just use the post office for package delivery, you know what happens if they can't deliver it into your hands? It goes back to your local post office, and they hold it for you-

    That is simply not true as a general proposition. I get packages left on my porch by USPS on a routine basis if they don't fit in my mail box. And there is no meaningful difference between putting a package in an unlocked mailbox and putting it on your porch. Furthermore I'm not particularly worried about package theft where I live so if I'm fine with it being left there why is that a problem?

    UPS sucks. They don't maintain anything like the network of post offices managed by USPS, and instead they like to gamble with the safety of your packages in ways the post office simply won't.

    UPS will do exactly what they are paid to do. Same with FedEx. If the person sending the package tells them to leave it on the porch then that is what they do. If they pay them to hand it to a specific person then that is what they do. It's up to you. If you are too cheap to pay for signed delivery then the risk is on you if the package gets lost.

    Blaiming the USPS for being "less efficient" is crazy: they *do more* for you.

    If they were more efficient with packages there would be no need for companies like UPS and FedEx. I have literally shipped tens of thousands of packages though companies I've owned and worked in over the years. I've used pretty much every major package courier (USPS, UPS, FedEx, DHL etc) plus a large number of LTL carriers. USPS is BY FAR the biggest pain in the ass to do business with, has the most clumsy handling procedures, operates the slowest, their software sucks (and is usually third party anyway), and for packages above a few pounds are routinely among the more expensive options if you ship any kind of volume at all. They certainly don't do more for me - not for anything I actually need. They have a bunch of needlessly complicated postage options which add cost and slow things down. I've NEVER seen a postal worker in a hurry. If I need a package delivered quickly (i.e. tomorrow), USPS is a terrible option. Stand in line at the post office? I've had to wait 20 minutes for them to deal with a 5 person line and nobody ahead of me was doing anything complicated or unusual. That is just absurd.

  86. Abstraction layer by sjbe · · Score: 1

    There is no abstraction.

    It is the very definition of an abstraction layer. USPS won't allow delivery to a post office box so they substitute the street address of the po box and pretend it is a "street address" when it is not. A FAR simpler solution would have been to simply allow third parties to deliver to PO boxes and not waste everyone's time with street addresses that really aren't street addresses. So they added a layer of complexity to "solve" a problem that they created instead of eliminating the actual root cause of the problem.

  87. Re:The simplest solution would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Australia if you cant have someone present for the delivery

    WRONG!
    I have had a few deliveries dumped at the doorstep. And I live in Australia.

  88. open the pkg? by mcswell · · Score: 1

    "... enabled him to watch helplessly as a thief opened his package." Why do thieves open packages on someone's front steps? Why not grab the package and throw it in the car, wouldn't that be faster and easier for the thief?

    (We had a discussion about this on our neighborhood email list, with several claiming that thieves opened packages to see if there was anything worth stealing, and me claiming that they wouldn't do that. It looks like I'm wrong, but I'm curious why.)