Slashdot Mirror


User: m50d

m50d's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,913
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,913

  1. Not really on Modified Prius gets up to 180 Miles Per Gallon · · Score: 1

    Power plants don't have to be mobile. They don't have to be lightweight so they can accelerate. And they can have far more exhaust treatment equipment than your typical car. They're a lot more efficient, really. Also, it puts everything in place for a switch. If we get fusion or some other form of power working tomorrow, providing us with unlimited free electricity, the fleet of conventional cars will still be polluting and people won't be able to afford new ones for some years. Now granted that's not likely to happen, but improvements in energy efficiency can and do occur, and separate power grids in cars delay their takeup by about 10 years overall.

  2. Re:Fsking video format. on Behind the Scenes At Google · · Score: 1

    The reason they're worse is because there aren't really good free alternatives.

  3. Re:Oil industry? on Modified Prius gets up to 180 Miles Per Gallon · · Score: 1

    The fact that you're not paying the rest of us for the damage you're doing to our lungs, the floods you're causing through rising sea levels, etc.

  4. Re:Did anyone else think... on Python Moving into the Enterprise · · Score: 1

    Does this mean parker-stone are no longer going to be involved? Or is Monty Python helping them out? That would be sweet

  5. Re:Advantages? on Python Moving into the Enterprise · · Score: 1

    In that example, about the same. Python has the advantage for being shorter, and "print" makes more sense immediately than System.out.println. Using new makes things a little clearer on the java side, but only a little. Declaring class members possibly makes it a bit more readable. But the python meaningful indentation makes things a lot clearer. The braces just get in the way, plus they mean it's possible to indent deceptively, by accident if nothing else.

  6. Re:before RTFA on Python Moving into the Enterprise · · Score: 1

    I'm not. The reason it's taken so long is the same reason java was so successful in the first place: marketing. There's no one marketing python to enterprises; the fact that it is succeeding shows superior quality will win out in the end. Good for Linux, no?

  7. Re:Microsoft's involved? on Python Moving into the Enterprise · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Happy. It's open, and could be a sign that MS is actually "getting it". Besides, it's already possible to do python under java, but IronPython looks better, and MS is employing the guy who does it.

  8. Re:Advantages? on Python Moving into the Enterprise · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://netpub.cstudies.ubc.ca/oleary/images/python _java_comparison.gif may give you an idea. Quite simply it's easier to program in, and you're more productive using it.

  9. Re:Or run Solaris on UltraSparcs a decade ago on Windows XP X64 Goes Gold · · Score: 1

    Or winNT on an Alpha before that. I just assumed we were talking specifically x86-64.

  10. Re:Well this help get rid of physical kilogram? on Scientists Weigh Smallest Mass Ever · · Score: 1

    It was known well enough already. As soon as the standards body decides they're happy with putting a value on the Avogardro number we'll get a proper kilogram.

  11. "Can now see" on Windows XP X64 Goes Gold · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or they could have used SUSE and have seen what it does, what, 5 months ago?

  12. Re:To the Readers of Slashdot... on Best Buy to Eliminate Rebates · · Score: 1

    No, April Fools are meant to actually fool people. They're meant to be funny and entertaining because of it. They can be obviously stupid if they're funny, but they're not meant to be unfunny nonsense.

  13. Re:Whoa on Gallery and Coppermine Merger · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I saw the date, but I didn't expect them to just accept every submission that came because it's April the first. That story would actually have been interesting.

  14. Re:What the hell? on ThinkGeek ThinkGeek ThinkGEEK! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least they're being open about it this time.

  15. Of course on Information Does Not Exist? · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone who has tried to read slashdot today can see that there is no information at all.

  16. Surrender on NASA Builds Worlds Largest Paper Airplane · · Score: 1

    OK, I give up. They're coming too fast. Just let me have my first post. Please? Heck, it's now april the *second* where I live.

  17. Whoa on Gallery and Coppermine Merger · · Score: 1

    That's an impressively optimised submission-approval script they've got there. Has slashdot realised it can save money by firing all the editors and just approving anything that gets submitted?

  18. Re:s/*//g on U.N. Decides to Shut Down Internet Permanently · · Score: 1

    Reading a few stories ahead it seems your wish has been granted

  19. Re:Argh on Positive Proof of Water on Mars · · Score: 1

    Last night? Methinks he's doing it right now. Anyway, this has been in BJAODN on WP for years.

  20. Re:Now that's funny. on **No Title** · · Score: 1

    It's certainly a helluva lot funnier than most of the other attempts

  21. Much funnier on Blizzard Teams with Pandaren Xpress · · Score: 1, Offtopic
  22. Predictions on USB Fundue Set · · Score: 1

    Are the slashdot editors just reading people's sarcastic "what next" comments and then posting stories of them?

  23. OK on Google Moves Into Drink Market · · Score: 1

    I think slashdot owes an apology to the guy who sarcastically predicted this story coming here in the satellite story. Really. (I believe his exact words were "What next, a story on Google Gulp?")

  24. Re:Heh, April Fools crashes on Britannica Takes Over the Wikimedia Foundation · · Score: 1

    Nope, I'm finding kopete won't connect to MSN for me either.

  25. Re:Next /. news on Gmail's Birthday Presents · · Score: 1

    Use <URL:foobar> like it says at the bottom of the comment box. Or ordinary <A> tags.