Slashdot Mirror


Best Buy to Eliminate Rebates

plover writes "According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune 'In response to customer complaints, Best Buy, the world's largest electronics retailer, promised today to eliminate mail-in rebates within two years.' Can it be that we're finally nearing the end of one of the most hated marketing ploys of all?" Further commentary available at BusinessWeek.

609 comments

  1. First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    April fools? I think not!

  2. Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...with the April Fool's posts!

    1. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly: April 1st has become "I don't read Slashdot" day. It's becoming absolutely retarded.

    2. Re:Enough... by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      So, has anyone heard of brendan keillor? That's with two ls

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    3. Re:Enough... by errxn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly, this is no April Fool's post, whether it was intended as such or not. I have yet to see the rebate check for the very laptop I'm typing this post on, and I mailed the claim in the Monday after Thanksgiving.

      Nor do I expect to see it, nor am I going to even bother bitching to Best Buy about it. As they say, "don't throw good money after bad."

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    4. Re:Enough... by tdemark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have yet to see the rebate check for the very laptop I'm typing this post on, and I mailed the claim in the Monday after Thanksgiving.

      So, why don't you call the number on the rebate form? You know, the one that you kept a copy of, along with copies of the UPC and receipt?

      I've done several thousand dollars of rebates over the last three years and I have never not received them in the end. On a few, I did need to call in when the turnaround date passed without a check. That's why it is really important to keep copies of everything you send in as well as the appropriate due dates for each.

      - Tony

    5. Re:Enough... by sosegumu · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've done several thousand dollars of rebates over the last three years and I have never not received them in the end.

      That has *not* been my experience--especially with larger rebates.

      My brother-in-law and I both bought Compaq notebooks at a big box electronics store with a $100 rebate from Compaq. Strangley, both of us got a notice saying that our rebates forms were illegible and to resubmit them. Of course those were rejected since they did not contain the *original* UPCs from the package since we sent them in on first go-round and they were not returned with the notice.

      After numerous calls to Compaq with no resolution, I filed a complaint with my state's Attorney General's office. My brother-in-law did nothing. I got my refund in less than a week; my brother-in-law never received his. Coincidence? I think not.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    6. Re:Enough... by suso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might be the exception more than the rule. Lately I've had better luck with rebates, but I haven't done one through BestBuy in a while. About 2-3 years ago when I tried to do them, there were 2 that I didn't ever receive and I followed the rules of the rebate perfectly. But it was for $10 or something so it wasn't really worth my time to call about it. Unfortunately thats probably what they are counting on. Rebates are bad for consumers.

    7. Re:Enough... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I've received every rebate I've sent in for from Best Buy, including a $100 rebate on a laptop about 2 years ago. I never received anything back from them except a check.

      I also just recently purchased an $800 digital camera in San Antonio. I was hundreds of miles away when I discovered a problem (a stuck pixel, or a "hot pixel" or whatever you wanted to call them). I walked into another Best Buy, explained that I had found a problem and would like to exchange, and they accepted it no problem at all. Didn't just swap out the camera either--they told me, "We're going to exchange the camera, lense, and battery... might as well start fresh."

      I'm sure Best Buy is guilty of all kinds of bad things. All companies above a certain size are just because, statistically speaking, it's hard to do nothing wrong once you get to a certain size. But I've personally had nothing but good luck with Best Buy.

    8. Re:Enough... by rtphokie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You and me both. I've only had to fight on one rebate, with Staples. I got a card in the mail that said sometime to the effect of "Your purchase on 3/1/2001 does not fall within the rebate offer for purchased made within 3/1/2001 and 3/31/2001". After I picked my jaw up off the floor, I called the number, they said there was nothing they could do.

      I called the local Staples store and asked the mangager to resolve it. He refused until I asked what he would rather do, solve this problem with me, with the consumer reporter on the local news, or the North Carolina Attorney General's office. I got a call back from Staples corporate HQ the next day and my rebate check via fed a couple days after that.

      Rebates are bad when they are simply sales that should be offered in store. When they are deep discounts, I like them because I'm organized enough to actually send them in and keep track of what I've received and what I havent.

    9. Re:Enough... by Nova1313 · · Score: 1

      if the offer is from best buy (not a manufacturer) they are fairly good about getting them sent out to you. If you have any problem usually you can take the rejection letter to a store and get it straightened out. It's always been my experience in the past that I recieved Best buy rebates. I hardly ever get the manufacturer ones back though.

      --
      There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
    10. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only been denied one rebate, and it was a $5 rebate on a pack of CD-Rs.

      Otherwise, I've gotten rebates for $100+ without trouble.

    11. Re:Enough... by artisteeternite · · Score: 1

      My mom didn't receive a rebate from Best Buy when she should have. She called them, and she ended up getting a rebate for twice the amount.

      I myself have had no problems with receiving back rebate checks from Best Buy.

    12. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, why don't you call the number on the rebate form? You know, the one that you kept a copy of, along with copies of the UPC and receipt?

      Frankly, I have enough paperwork to keep track of. This free bookeeping needed to chase deadbeats is not something I care to provide. If they depend on breakage of rebates to keep them in business, I simply take my business elsewhere. The Costco rebates on the other hand work. A short time online, and they show up. They also don't have a rebate on just about everything in the store. Often I'll buy an item not knowing it has a rebate. At the register they provide me all the paperwork to file for the rebate, a very nice suprise at the register. I pay the price on the shelf unlike Best Buy who lists the price after the rebate in the big number. Then I get a nice suprise that I get a rebate on an item at Costco, again in contrast to Best Buy where I frequently didn't have enough at the register because the price to carry it out the door was $50 more than I expected. I left a purchase at the checkout for that very reason. The salesman had to walk me back to the shelf to show me the real price as I argued the price at the register. Oh the fine print says Price After Rebate. This was not a nice shopping experiance at Best Buy.

    13. Re:Enough... by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      I got mildly burned on a Best Buy rebate once, though I was not without fault. I was buying a DirecTV system, and the clerk at Best Buy encouraged me to buy a package system of dish + two receivers, even though I really only needed the dish since I was going to buy a DirecTivo unit. Anyway, he convinced me that, after the special rebates being offered, the package system would end up being free. $99 for the package with free installation and a $100 rebate.

      It was a great deal, and I dutifully filled in all the rebate paperwork. A couple months later I got a response back informing me that said rebate offer had ended the week before I bought the package. I checked the original rebate offer form and sure enough it had.

      At that point it wasn't really worth trying to go to the Best Buy and inform them that several months ago an employee whose name I never knew and whose face I don't recall told me something thast wasn't true, and I have no documentation to prove that. I just chalked it up as a lesson to check the rebate details myself before I buy, and I'm reminded every time I see the pair of receivers that I'll never use.

    14. Re:Enough... by wytcld · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had to fight with Staples recently for a rebate where the rebate form had been printed out by the cash register in the store. They claimed the form had lacked the date. When I pointed out that their cash register had printed the date on the form, they claimed they'd sent the letter denying the claim by accident, and finally paid it.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    15. Re:Enough... by tdemark · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I have enough paperwork to keep track of.

      Who said anything about "paper"?

      I picked up a Brother multifunction printer/scanner with built in network (great deal with large rebate). I can scan a document to a PDF that gets emailed to me.

      I put the form, receipt, and UPC on the scanning bed and hit "Scan To Email". About 30 seconds later, it hits my mailbox and I drag the PDF to a folder on my file server. I then rename the file "YYYYMMDD-AMT-WhoIsRebateFor".

      Easy to store, easy to reference and it takes less than a minute.

      - Tony

    16. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Rebates are bad for consumers.

      Rebates are bad for stupid, illiterate or lazy consumers. I've never had a single problem getting my rebates.

    17. Re:Enough... by ip_fired · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you have been lucky. I purchased a Tivo from Best Buy, that came with a $100 rebate. I sent in the rebate the next day, everything was in order. I even typed up my name and address so that they couldn't claim it was illegible.

      They claimed that it was lost in the mail. I've *never* had mail lost except sending it to rebate places. I think it was probably "lost" after they received it. I went to Best Buy, where they reprinted the receipt for me, but they wouldn't give me the rebate form again. I called the rebate company, and they told me to get the form off of their website. I went there, and it didn't exist. They didn't have a single Tivo Rebate form. So I'm out $100.

      Lessons learned:
      Send your rebate via registered mail. And if that doesn't work, you're screwed.

      I hope they implement instant rebates. Now that would be nice, and I'd probably go to Best Buy more often.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    18. Re:Enough... by gcauthon · · Score: 0

      Oh, you mean keep copies of everything even though they tell you to send the originals? And I suppose we're supposed to send everything registered mail and require signatures, right? And then spend hours on the phone with outsourced call center a-holes that just repeat "well send it again" up until the deadline passes.

      Oh wait, I did all that and still no rebate! After their latest rebate shenanigans, I'm never shopping at Best Buy and I'm never again buying something that offers a rebate. There's too many places to shop to have to put up with this nonsense.

    19. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Rebates are bad for stupid, illiterate or lazy consumers. I've never had a single problem getting my rebates.

      Surely you meant: Mail-in rebates are for stupid or illiterate consumers.

      Let me enumerate the fetures of a mail-in rebate as compared to an actual, old-fashioned, "primitive", you know, cash discount:

      • Mail in rebates make the consumer perform the paperwork and legwork instad of the vendor
      • Mail in rebates are designed to create an apperance of a lower price while not offerring one unconditionally, i.e. they are a form of a scam
      • Mail in rebates are designed to offer the manufacturer wiggle room in not paying them, i.e. claims of "illegible writing" or "water damaged envelopes" or "we never got that mail" etc are possible.
      • Mail in rebates are designed to be an annoyance and hassle in order to deter consumers from actually claiming them

      Literate and wise consumers recognize this for what it is, i.e. a form of a "bait and switch" scam by the vendor and manufacturer and do complain to Better Business Bureau or law officials.

      I've never had a single problem getting my rebates.

      Congratulations, the vendor has trained you to be a circus monkey for them: "Plague, cut the barcode, fill the form with all your personal data for sale to direct mailers, pay for postage, run to the post office, go to the bank depositing the cheque! Good monkey!"

    20. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Oh yes, silly me I also forgot to mention:
      • Mail in rebates are also a financial scam, since the vendor/manufacturer gets to hold on to your money for 8-12 weeks, earning iterest on it and using it for operational purposes.
    21. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Oh my memory... but of course there is also this!
      • In places with high sales tax (say Canada at 14%) a $50 "rebate" comes out to $42.50 due to the fact that it comes after taxes i.e. double taxation.
    22. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0

      The truth is that I have not personally met ANYONE that has had problems with rebates.

      If you think that the only things that get lost in the mail are rebate forms, you sourly mistaken. I've had bills, letters and even a package that took over three months to finally be delivered.

      I actually got a rebate check the other day..after someone else had seemed to have opened it. but I still got the check.

    23. Re:Enough... by oirtemed · · Score: 1

      except when they say its invalid and want you to resend.... then they demand original upcs...which they have thrown away.

    24. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...want to know why corporations love america? because americans are sheep and suckers.

      as is demnostrated by the big use of such rebates.

    25. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0

      Surely you meant: Mail-in rebates are for stupid or illiterate consumers.

      No, thats not what I meant at all. Nice try though.

      Let me enumerate the fetures of a mail-in rebate as compared to an actual, old-fashioned, "primitive", you know, cash discount:

      Lets understand that, you know, rebates have traditionally been a way for the manufactures to lower thier price, when a merchant doesn't want to have a sale. Lower prices spur buying, and rebates are a way to lower prices (as they can't force merchants to do).

      Mail in rebates make the consumer perform the paperwork and legwork instad of the vendor

      Oh my god, you mean that, *gasp* the customer has to prove they bought the product for which the rebate is being offered, and during the time frame its being offered? You're right, thats asking alot.

      Mail in rebates are designed to create an apperance of a lower price while not offerring one unconditionally, i.e. they are a form of a scam

      No, they are designed with the understanding that you pay full price, and the manufacturer will send you a check for the rebate amount, thus lowering you end price. I fail to see how saying 'buy this, and i'll send you a check for $10' is a scam. The fact is that it is unconditional.

      Mail in rebates are designed to offer the manufacturer wiggle room in not paying them, i.e. claims of "illegible writing" or "water damaged envelopes" or "we never got that mail" etc are possible.

      Um, what exactly do you expect if your entry is illegible? How can they possibly send it out? They could guess at your name or address...but would that get it to you for sure? Mail can be damaged by water, and things do get lost in the mail. But its not only rebates that get hit.

      Mail in rebates are designed to be an annoyance and hassle in order to deter consumers from actually claiming them

      Yes, its a real hassel to fill out your name and address, and prove that you a) bought the proper item (by providing a upc) and b) buying it within the specified time period (by providing a copy of your reciept). It can't be much less info then that, or do you think companies should just take your word for it?

      Literate and wise consumers recognize this for what it is, i.e. a form of a "bait and switch" scam by the vendor and manufacturer and do complain to Better Business Bureau or law officials.

      Actually literate and wise consumers can properly fill out a form and put it in an envelope.

      Congratulations, the vendor has trained you to be a circus monkey for them: "Plague, cut the barcode, fill the form with all your personal data for sale to direct mailers, pay for postage, run to the post office, go to the bank depositing the cheque! Good monkey!"

      You're a fuckwit. I could easily call you a trained monkey for using a bank over a credit union (they trained you to give them all your info, then turn around and sell it).

      Guess what, most rebate forms state they WON'T sell your data...and I didn't realize that name and address was ALL of my personal data. You're right though, I should expect them to magically teleport the check directly into my hand, without them even know who sent in the form!

      You're got some unrealistic expectations. Go join a church, they believe alot of non-sense too. You'll fit right in.

    26. Re:Enough... by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      Hi, my name is Ben. Pleased to have met you.

      Now you've met someone that has had problems with rebates.

      :)

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    27. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dub thee Best Buy Butt Monkey Boy.

    28. Re:Enough... by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Lessons learned:
      Send your rebate via registered mail. And if that doesn't work, you're screwed.

      No, lesson learned: it costs 5 cents to xerox a receipt/rebate form and $100 not to.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    29. Re:Enough... by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "Lets understand that, you know, rebates have traditionally been a way for the manufactures to lower thier price, when a merchant doesn't want to have a sale. Lower prices spur buying, and rebates are a way to lower prices (as they can't force merchants to do)."

      Bullshit. Merchants ADVERTISE the rebates like dangling bait. In fact, most merchants advertise the REBATED price instead of the actual "you are paying this at the register" price.

      "No, they are designed with the understanding that you pay full price, and the manufacturer will send you a check for the rebate amount, thus lowering you end price. I fail to see how saying 'buy this, and i'll send you a check for $10' is a scam. The fact is that it is unconditional."

      It is mostly an advertising scam. If you fail to see that you are blind.

      "Um, what exactly do you expect if your entry is illegible? How can they possibly send it out? They could guess at your name or address...but would that get it to you for sure? Mail can be damaged by water, and things do get lost in the mail. But its not only rebates that get hit."

      See below...

      "Yes, its a real hassel to fill out your name and address, and prove that you a) bought the proper item (by providing a upc) and b) buying it within the specified time period (by providing a copy of your reciept). It can't be much less info then that, or do you think companies should just take your word for it?"

      And since they are the ones determining legibility, you have no say in the matter. And while we are at it, xerox copies aren't accepted, for obvious reasons, so how does one resubmit when they don't send back ALL the original documents (including the ORIGINAL reciept and UPC labels)?

      It is more productive if the manufacturer's rebate is between the murchant and the manufacturer instead of the customer and manufacturer. This is called an "instant rebate" and the customer is out of the picture as soon as they leave the store.

      It is an advertising scam in that you will see in large red letters "$PRICE*" and following the usual look at the bottom of the page in the smallest print known to man is *$PRICE after $X rebate". That is a scam when you boldly display one price and charge at the register another.

      "Guess what, most rebate forms state they WON'T sell your data...and I didn't realize that name and address was ALL of my personal data. You're right though, I should expect them to magically teleport the check directly into my hand, without them even know who sent in the form!"

      "Most rebate forms" say nothing of the sort. It is a trade off for the rebate that you will get put on a spam list. It is silly to not expect them to use it for marketing both mail and the selling of the data collected. They are a business after all and if that data becomes more valuable than it costs to produce bet your ass they will sell it.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    30. Re:Enough... by dickrichardv8 · · Score: 1

      .........being replaced by stamp books. Can I redeem my S&H Green stamps for a MAC G5?

    31. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They claimed that it was lost in the mail."

      When someone makes a 'mistake' that puts money in their pocket, expect them to make that 'mistake' again. And again and again.

    32. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when someone makes a 'mistake' that puts money in their pocket, expect them to make that 'mistake' again and again and again.

    33. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0

      Mail in rebates are also a financial scam, since the vendor/manufacturer gets to hold on to your money for 8-12 weeks, earning iterest on it and using it for operational purposes.

      Ohhh....$50 * 1.02 = 51. A whole dollar per month? Yea, those evil bastards.

    34. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0

      In places with high sales tax (say Canada at 14%) a $50 "rebate" comes out to $42.50 due to the fact that it comes after taxes i.e. double taxation.

      Of course thats the manufacturers fault, a high sales tax. I'm sure its 14% as a direct result of offering rebates huh?

      Double taxation? Huh? You paid the sales tax at purchase and then you paid tax...oh wait, you didn't pay tax again. So thats a total of one time that you paid taxes, so you can't claim double taxation.

      The fact is that sales tax is between you and the government. They dictate when it has to be collected and how much..dont' like it they get it lowered. Are you also upset that when you buy something its not really 10.99, its 12.53 instead? False advertising!! OMG!!

      Idiot.

    35. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but i don't know you well enough to know if you had an actual problem or just failed to follow instructions.

    36. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Merchants ADVERTISE the rebates like dangling bait. In fact, most merchants advertise the REBATED price instead of the actual "you are paying this at the register" price.

      I'm sure they don't mind advertising; it brings people into thier store, but the fact is that it costs the merchant nothing (they still make thier full profit margin).


      It is mostly an advertising scam. If you fail to see that you are blind.


      Funny, because I've gotten all the rebates I've sent in. If its a scam, its not a very good one.

      And since they are the ones determining legibility, you have no say in the matter. And while we are at it, xerox copies aren't accepted, for obvious reasons, so how does one resubmit when they don't send back ALL the original documents (including the ORIGINAL reciept and UPC labels)?

      Again its funny that all of my friends and family get thier rebates just fine. Maybe you just write like a 2yr old? I've never had to resubmit, but I bet a call to them and they will explain how to resubmit. If they didn't, they'd quickly be fined.

      It is more productive if the manufacturer's rebate is between the murchant and the manufacturer instead of the customer and manufacturer. This is called an "instant rebate" and the customer is out of the picture as soon as they leave the store.

      Nothing stops the retails and manufactures from doing this, of course there's nothing to garentee the merchant will pass on the savings (in fact, there's much insentive not to).

      It is an advertising scam in that you will see in large red letters "$PRICE*" and following the usual look at the bottom of the page in the smallest print known to man is *$PRICE after $X rebate". That is a scam when you boldly display one price and charge at the register another.

      Ahh, a nice claim, do you have an proof, a photo perhaps of the unusually small letters? Do you need a magnifying glass to read them? Or perhaps just glasses...because the ones I've seen that do change the tag, its pretty clearly labeled that its after rebate. Oh, and if you would rather not buy the product because the lower price is after rebate, feel free to leave it at the register (where they will explain to you what you missed in the aisle).

      "Most rebate forms" say nothing of the sort. It is a trade off for the rebate that you will get put on a spam list. It is silly to not expect them to use it for marketing both mail and the selling of the data collected. They are a business after all and if that data becomes more valuable than it costs to produce bet your ass they will sell it.

      All the ones I've filled out recently have. Not to meantion that i never saw an increase in postal spam after filling out rebates. Most spam i get is 'resident' and places i've actually ordered from (ie they send me a catalog).

      Does the tin foil hat chaff your head from wearing it 24/7?

      Believe me, business does ALOT of scummy things, but MIRs don't seem to be one of them.

    37. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I dub thee retarted asshat.

      I've done 2 BB rebates at most; all the other ones where manufacturer direct.

    38. Re:Enough... by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      I think there are enough people complaining about this that it might be a real phenomenon. Just because you haven't had problems yet doesn't mean that it doesn't happen and that all vendors and manufacturers are saints.

      Just imagine how much money they would save if they "lost" 5% of the rebates. They increased their sales without having the penalty of actually lowering their prices.

      I mean, if you are really going to offer a discount on a product, just sell it to the vendor at a reduced price, and make sure they sell it with that discount.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    39. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I never said business where saints, just that I don't believe there's a problem with MIRs.

      I think is that a minority is complaining so thats why it seems like there's a problem.

      Let's also not forget that some (most?) in that minorty may not have followed the instructions..so that would indicate even lessof a problem.

      I don't think ther'es a really good way to force merchants to offer a sale...why would they? It may be individual stores that don't offer them too...is the manufacturer supposed to check ALL of thier merchants? Seems unreasonable to me.

    40. Re:Enough... by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to enforce this. Put the price you want on the box, make it big and bright, send it to the stores, and put a note on there that says if any customer had to pay more, report it to the manufacturer.

      The customers will police it for you. Manufacturers and Vendors usually have contractual agreements, and there are usually fines that can be imposed upon one or the other for breaking agreements. They could use something like this to enforce the pricing.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    41. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ohhh....$50 * 1.02 = 51. A whole dollar per month? Yea, those evil bastards.

      $1 times 1,500,000 units sold = 1.5 million per month. Evil, crooked bastards indeed. Just because you are being scammed for a small amount, that does not mean that the scam itself is not large or highly profitable. According to your inane logic, if each thief steals only 50 cents from you per month, that is quite all right. This attitude quickly leads to thousands of thieves doing it.

    42. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Of course thats the manufacturers fault, a high sales tax.No, the manufacturers fault is advertising a $50 rebate on his product, a statement which is false.

      Double taxation? Huh? You paid the sales tax at purchase and then you paid tax...oh wait, you didn't pay tax again.

      Since the rebate is performed after taxes, the doubling of the tax occurs on the rebate portion itself, i.e. you are being refunded less then $50 promised in the price of the item.

      Are you also upset that when you buy something its not really 10.99, its 12.53 instead? False advertising!! OMG!!

      Yes I am because allowing a small thief to get away with something, quickly prompts a larger thief to attempt the same on a larger scale. In the case of the mail "rebate", the vendor is successfully lying about the value of his "discount" to the tune of tens of millions of dollars since a $7.50 times a million units sold is $7.5 million.

      Idiot.

      One of us allows himself to be fleeced by an assorted crowd of thieves and crooks on what appears a regular basis and, what is more amazing, actively encourages such practice. The other does not. I leave it as a exercise to the reader as to which one of us is an "idiot".

    43. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Lets understand that, you know, rebates have traditionally been a way for the manufactures to lower thier price, when a merchant doesn't want to have a sale. Lower prices spur buying, and rebates are a way to lower prices (as they can't force merchants to do).

      "as they can't force merchants to do"?! Utter bullshit. It is in the vested interest of both the seller and the manufacturer to spur sales. To do that, a positively ancient mechanism exists: lowering the sale price. It was done ever since Phoenicians invented a thing called "money". Mail-in rebate is an attempt to pervert that straightforward system by appearing to offer the traditional discount while allowing the vendor/seller an ability to lower its effective amount in many ways. In other words the consumer is a loser here compared to a traditional cash discount. Simple as that.

      Oh my god, you mean that, *gasp* the customer has to prove they bought the product for which the rebate is being offered, and during the time frame its being offered? You're right, thats asking alot.

      Yes it is. It is asking the consumer to perform unpaid work on behalf of the vendor/manufacturer. Which is intended to discourage following up on this process. While it appears that you enjoy performing unpaid work for BestBuy, most of us do not.

      No, they are designed with the understanding that you pay full price, and the manufacturer will send you a check for the rebate amount, thus lowering you end price. I fail to see how saying 'buy this, and i'll send you a check for $10' is a scam. The fact is that it is unconditional.

      It is conditional because a number of factors exist which can interfere in the process as it depends on work being done by the consumers, the vendor's bureaucracy, postal service, banking etc. Thus not only the vendor is afforded excuses for not paying, even if he plays it fair, there are other intermediate players who can drop the ball. Contrast it with a simple price discount at the time of purchase: none of these factors exist there which can affect the price after the sale was made.

      Um, what exactly do you expect if your entry is illegible? How can they possibly send it out? They could guess at your name or address...but would that get it to you for sure? Mail can be damaged by water, and things do get lost in the mail. But its not only rebates that get hit.

      This goes again to the "conditional" part. The specific examples I gave are those of unproveable excuses which the vendor can employ at his whim. None of them can be verified by the consumer (what is legible to the consumer can be claimed to be "unreadable" by the vendor's staff in India).

      Yes, its a real hassel to fill out your name and address, and prove that you a) bought the proper item (by providing a upc) and b) buying it within the specified time period (by providing a copy of your reciept). It can't be much less info then that, or do you think companies should just take your word for it?

      Again you seem to miss the most basic of concepts here: it is not my responsibility to provide a company which sold me a toaster with my detailed personal information. It is not my place as a customer to perform paperwork for it, involving UPCs, forms and running to the post office. My only obligation is to pay the advertised price at the cash register. All additional conditions and after-sale manouvering serve only and exclusively to further the interests of the vendor, not mine.

      Actually literate and wise consumers can properly fill out a form and put it in an envelope.

      Actually no literate and wise person submits himself/herself to bureaucratic procedures on his/her own time in order to make sales more profitable for the vendor. Wise consumers buy the same items with the discount included in the sale price and leave the mail in "rebates" to those whose self-respect is somewhat lacking.

      I could easily call you a trained monkey for using a bank over a cred

    44. Re:Enough... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      I've gone through that wringer; wait five months, call a number, wait another five months.

      I'd rather just buy a product for a reasonable price, and not have to invest hours of my time trying to actually get the price I was offered.

      Best Buy and CompUSA have both saved me several thousand dollars, but not in the way they intended: They both make the actual process of purchasing a product into an unpleasant ordeal, and I end up just sticking a couple hundred bucks in computer equipment, DVD's, or whatever, on any surface that's handy and simply walking out without it.

      My feeling is this: If I can't actually count on paying the price that's advertised, why should I trust the vendor on any other implied or stated promise?

    45. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd gladly take an Instant Rebate of lesser value than a mail in rebate.

      I think the the best way to look at a mail in rebate is from the business sense. With a MIR you're loaning money to the company you purchased the item from. Now, this loan is quite awful, you get no interest on your loan, and in fact it costs you time and money (paperwork, stamps, envelopes, copies, etc), and the duration of the loan is unknown ( 1.5 months - 3 months - or more). Now, it gets worse... the party you made the loan out to has the right to refuse to pay that money back, because of a technicality (invalid upc, illedigle reciept, item not circled etc).

      And to top it off if everything was done correctly, they can still refuse to return the loaned money ( we lost it, we didn't get it, it was incorrect, etc), and the burden of proof lies upon you. And since they do not accept copies you'll now incur more time and money using other resources to get your money back ( calling and complaining, filing a suit, threatening legal action, etc).

      Wow, if real banks had to play by these rules, I'd be rich by now, and they'd be in the poor house.

    46. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I thought of this...but if I was a merchant, I'd tell the manufacturer to piss off. My position would be 'Why does the manufacturer get to dictate my profit margin? I know I could charge customers more, and they'd be willing to pay, so why should someone else tell me I can't.'

      Now I realize that there are a few products that people want a very specific brand for...but most products are not in that position.

      For example, do you think anyone avoids a restraunt because they choose to serve Pepsi over Coke?

      Do you think it matters which 100Mbit network card I buy? One might even considering buying the equivolent ATI card if its cheaper (due to rebate or sale price) than Nvidia.

      I think there are very few manufacturers in a position to dictate to the merchants.

    47. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      .No, the manufacturers fault is advertising a $50 rebate on his product, a statement which is false.

      Um, sorry its not false. You do in fact receive a check for $50. The manufacturer doesn't set sales tax, governments do. Tax is ALWAYS the responsibility of the consumer. You know that your 9.99 item will cost more because of tax. You should know that since sales tax must be paid on the SALE price that it won't be discounted because the rebate occurs after the fact.

      Since the rebate is performed after taxes, the doubling of the tax occurs on the rebate portion itself, i.e. you are being refunded less then $50 promised in the price of the item.

      The rebate says I get $50 back, and I get $50 back. Sales tax has noting to do with the manufacturer or merchant. ITS ALWAYS THE CONSUMERS RESPONSIBILITY. Unless you're a total moron going to the register (which i'm starting to supsect you are), you KNOW that tax will be charged on the full price, becauseyou're paying full price at the time of sale. Thats how the law works.

      Yes I am because allowing a small thief to get away with something, quickly prompts a larger thief to attempt the same on a larger scale. In the case of the mail "rebate", the vendor is successfully lying about the value of his "discount" to the tune of tens of millions of dollars since a $7.50 times a million units sold is $7.5 million.

      That $7.5 million goes right to the state, because they're the ones leving the tax. So if you want to call them a thief fine, but they are the ones forcing the 10.99 item to 12.53. and as a consumer you KNOW there is a sales tax.

      One of us allows himself to be fleeced by an assorted crowd of thieves and crooks on what appears a regular basis and, what is more amazing, actively encourages such practice. The other does not. I leave it as a exercise to the reader as to which one of us is an "idiot".

      Ha, ok. If my $100 purchase now becomes $50 + sales tax, then fine feel free to think I'm the idiot. However I'm not the one claiming double taxation and calling people thiefs for giving me money back. So go ahead pay full price ($106 after tax), and i'll gladly pay only $56 (after tax) for the same thing because I can properly enter my name and address on a form and drop it in the mail.

    48. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      But you'd never earn 1.5 mil on that dollar..the most YOU could get is that one dollar.

      You also fail to realize that the manufacturers get paid when they ship to the merchants. So the manufacturer has probably been letting the $40 they made selling to the merchant sit in the bank and using the intrest to pay for the rebates.

      I'm starting to understand your user name..

    49. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      But you'd never earn 1.5 mil on that dollar..the most YOU could get is that one dollar.

      One dollar scam or a million dollar scam, it doesnt matter, it is still a scam. I can only conclude that you are some sort of a thief engaged in stealing small amounts from other people and are therefore so desperate to try to defend this scheme to make your own activities appear harmless.

      You also fail to realize that the manufacturers get paid when they ship to the merchants. So the manufacturer has probably been letting the $40 they made selling to the merchant sit in the bank and using the intrest to pay for the rebates.

      What other funds they kept at the bank is their business and totally irrelevant. I am only concerned about my $50 that is sitting in their bank account for 8-12 weeks.

    50. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, the price/"rebate" advertising states in bold letters that the price of the item is say $100 "after mail-in $50 rebate". Which is a lie because when you do pay, you will pay taxes on $150 and receive $50 back which in effect refunds you less then $50 off the price of the item, i.e. advertised price is innacurate. The true price of the item was $107 (assuming 14% tax, a $7 on $50). The advertised, in bold letters, price was $100. You pay taxes on $150 ergo the real price was $107 before taxes. While one probably can find some sort of disclaimer in fine print on some of the ads, most of them I looked at simply say "Pay $100! *after $50 mail-in rebate" which is simply false. Noone is expecting not to pay tax, but the advertising creates an impression that the $50 is applied to the price of the item before taxes.

      This same situation occurs in regular sales. They don't include the taxes either. In all cases you are expected to pay sales tax, and neither manf. or vendor will speak of it (as its assumed, and various greatly region to region).

      You must be working for one of these vendors. Noone else would be so pighedeadly blind. Let me spell it out for you: the $7.5 million is the money that the vendor does not have to pay because he is lying about the amount of the refund. If his advertised ("after rebate") price was truly $100, the after-tax refund should have been $57. The consumer here loses by paing more tax then he would if the price was simply $100 as he was lead to believe. The governemt gets more tax then they deserve on this sale and the reason for it is the convoluted "rebate" scheme instigated by the vendor for his benefit.

      Listen dumbass, the money for taxes goes to the state. When they must collect is clearly spelt out; AT THE TIME OF SALE. The amount is also; A PERCENTAGE OF THE SALE PRICE. Whether or not you send the rebate in the tax is correct. At the time you bought the item, the price was x, and you paid a percentage. It does not matter that in the future you will get y back from the manufacturer.

      And get a clue dumbass...the vendor (or merchant) didn't come up with the rebate scheme, manufacturers did. Excluding BB rebates (which ARE done by the vendor, and a are only a small portion of all rebates) the vendor does nothing different than if there was no rebate offer.

      You seem not to comprehend the simple fact that I will simply purchase the same item for $50 with no hassle, no mail and no imbecillic rebate schemes at some other vendor who operates by the old-fashioned rules of the market, one who will not try to get me to do work for him in hopes of getting lucky and increasing the price after the sale. Some for example do an "instant rebate" which enables them to defeat the vendor's scheme for the benefit of the consumer, by simply applying the rebate value to the price and filling all the bullshit paperwork for you (with the name of the store on the forms instead of yours). But go ahead and get busy filling out these rebate forms, if you do enough of them they might hire you to run around BestBuy dressed up as the "Rebate Boy".

      You seem to fail to understand that if there's a rebate involved, I will ALWAYS pay less than your lowest price, becuase I can buy at that low price as well, in addition to getting the rebate.

      I've sent in at most 2 BB rebates ever, all the other dozens i've done have been manufacturer, and I've never had a problem.

      If a store wants to take the rebate for me and reduce the price fine with me, but taking 2 seconds to fill out a simple form is well worth $50 to me.

      With your convoluted logic, I can only assume that you're still living with your mom and working at a grocery store. So believe whatever you like, as long as it helps you cope with the fact that you have such low intelligence you can't fill out your name and address.

    51. Re:Enough... by Yelsink · · Score: 1

      they ripped me off twice. The best rip-off was when they gave me 10 days from the order date to send in the rebate and then shipped it to me in 9 days !!! I quit buying anything from them!!!

    52. Re:Enough... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      One dollar scam or a million dollar scam, it doesnt matter, it is still a scam. I can only conclude that you are some sort of a thief engaged in stealing small amounts from other people and are therefore so desperate to try to defend this scheme to make your own activities appear harmless.

      What I do with my money is my business, and what a business does with thier money is thier own.

      How its a scam I guess I'll never understand, but go ahead and live in your little fantasy world were somehow they've screwed you buy offering a lower price for being patient.

      What other funds they kept at the bank is their business and totally irrelevant. I am only concerned about my $50 that is sitting in their bank account for 8-12 weeks.

      Your other option is just to buy the item and not send in the form. Then you can't claim they have any of 'your money.' The rebate says it will take them some time to process and I'm sorry that you need everything right now. But the bottom line is if you don't like it, don't fill out the form.

      I just think its foolish not to take advantage of savings, even if it means you have to wait a few weeks.

    53. Re:Enough... by rickshaf · · Score: 1

      What you fail to understand is that, when a retailer makes you jump through hoops in order to secure the rebate, and you allow that to happen, you've become a de facto employee of the retailer. Do you want to be an employee of Best Buy, Fry's, and all these other sleazy companies?

    54. Re:Enough... by markhb · · Score: 1

      They used to do things like that (mfrs. dictate the retail price). I believe that, in the USA at least, it has been ruled to be illegal.

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    55. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      How its a scam I guess I'll never understand, but go ahead and live in your little fantasy world were somehow they've screwed you buy offering a lower price for being patient.

      Well clearly FTC lives in the same "fantasy" world and thereofore BestBuy (and others) are abandoning their con under regulatory preasure.

    56. Re:Enough... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      This same situation occurs in regular sales. They don't include the taxes either. In all cases you are expected to pay sales tax, and neither manf. or vendor will speak of it (as its assumed, and various greatly region to region).

      Nothing of the sort. On a regular "sale" you pay the tax on advertised price, not on some other, higher price.

      At the time you bought the item, the price was x, and you paid a percentage. It does not matter that in the future you will get y back from the manufacturer.

      Which is one of the ways in which the "mail in rebate" is at a disvantage to a regular discount at the cash register.

      And get a clue dumbass...the vendor (or merchant) didn't come up with the rebate scheme, manufacturers did. Excluding BB rebates (which ARE done by the vendor, and a are only a small portion of all rebates) the vendor does nothing different than if there was no rebate offer.

      The whole process exists exclusively because the vendor is in collusion with the manufacturer. Otherwise, the prices "after rebate" would not be advertised by the vendor and would not be (falsely) featured on their price tags within the store. Were it indeed so that the manufacturer offered a coupon within a product packaging that were a surprise bonus, not identified by the vendor, you would have a point.

      This same situation occurs in regular sales. They don't include the taxes either. In all cases you are expected to pay sales tax, and neither manf. or vendor will speak of it (as its assumed, and various greatly region to region).

      No you wont since some honest vendors apply the "rebate" to the price before sale to me. Thus you and me both take advantage of it, I dont have to bother with mail, UPC codes and assorted crap and you do. On top of that I do not pay the tax on the rebate amount. It is as simple as that. The difference is that one vendor has a clue and tries to serve me as a customer and the other (Best Buy) does not.

      With your convoluted logic, I can only assume that you're still living with your mom and working at a grocery store. So believe whatever you like, as long as it helps you cope with the fact that you have such low intelligence you can't fill out your name and address.

      Well well, an attempt at an age insult from someone clearly young enough not to remember the days before scams lile "mail in rebates" were the way of life for "consumers" of dubious intelligence like himself. It is probably completely lost on you, but what I am (vainly it seems) attempting to explain to you is in your own best interest as a customer. And luckily for you the practice of mail in "rebates" is coming to an end thanks to some folks at the FTC who have the common sense to protect such self-destructive individuals like yourself from their own gullibility.

    57. Re:Enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a tag says "69.99-30.00 Mail In Rebate=39.99" I fail to see the lie. This is how Best Buy's tags are written.

      When a manufacturer has a mail-in rebate available, and Best Buy chooses to pass it along to you, they have to charge you tax on the purchase you're making at Best Buy. It would be illegal for them to not charge you sales tax on the actual purchase you're making that day.

      Of course there's some work involved in getting rebates... it takes about 5 minutes, and you end up with 50 or more dollars in a couple months, tops. I'd love to make 50 bucks every 5 minutes.

      Two out of three people don't send them in. If they gave the rebates instantly, you'd be happy, but then the store itself would LOSE money on your purchase. Literally. So, I'm happy that they're eliminating it in a way... but in a way, it's gonna be a little harder for the real penny pinchers out there to get something (IN THE END) below the store's cost.

      Alan
      alanpugh43130@hotmail.com (Not an anonymous coward, just no time to register.)

    58. Re:Enough... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      They should have instant rebates, just like grocery stores do. It's not about dictating the selling price, it's about a discount, whether it's a percentage or a dollar value.
      Put a nice, really-hard-to-remove sticker with a peel-off tab on the packaging and let the store submit the rebate forms.
      The whole mail-in rebate deal reminds me something I saw about the insurance industry - a company had a .45 reject policy, which means that 45 percent of submitted claims HAD to be refused, for whatever reason.
      So, if someone decided to put up a fight, the company had the option to pay up, stonewall them, or let the client go through the headache of legal action.
      The company really has nothing to lose by delaying
      - they don't have to pay interest so the longer they hold onto your money, the better for them.
      If merchants are really in a position to dictate to the manufacturers, then the consumer-friendly ones should be telling the companies that mail-in rebates are unacceptable.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  3. About by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0, Troll

    fucking time!

    1. Re:About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The purpose of yesterday's shitty posts was to make today's posts seem great.

    2. Re:About by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know if you meant the April Fool's jokes or the rebates, but I agree!!!

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:About by voisine · · Score: 1, Troll

      Ha! all you suckers who don't mail in your rebates are subsidising my purchases. :P My rebates are bigger because most of you don't mail yours in, which is why it makes good business sense for best buy to offer products below cost after rebate. I'm sad to see it go.

    4. Re:About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Two years is the same as never. Next year it will be two years. The year after that it will be two years. And then it will be quietly forgotten.

      Best Buy loves selling your supplied demographic information (and it's generally correct and up-to-date is you want to get your rebate). And rebates never have to make it home. They get your demographic info whether or not they deign to honor your rebate request.

      Since rebates are interstate commerce (in almost all cases), there needs to be Federal law to protect consumers from rebates designed to make it so the consumer never receives their rebate.

  4. Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mail In rebates are a sham, in that it takes 8-12 weeks for the check to come in. I am not going to wait 3 months for a 2 dollar check.

    1. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead, you wait forever for a zero dollar check? Good idea.

      Forward all 2 dollar checks to me, please.

    2. Re:Mail-in sham... by blixel · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Mail-in sham... by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Rebates do make it seem like you are getting a deal, but you can go to one of Best Buy's competitors and buy the same item for Best Buy's price minus the rebate.

      Even better, order the item online - you might wait a few days for the item but it will be cheaper, even with shipping. No matter it's a scam because the reason they, or the manufacturer, offer a rebate is because there was a price break.

      There once was a time, you might just remember, when rebates were offered after you bought your item. Like the original "Zip" drive. I paid $200 for it when it came out, the same week it came out. Then after a few months they started offering rebates but they made it retroactive. That is what a rebate should be like.

      Using rebates to sucker in customers isn't always going to work. It's not that they are bad always, my current computer was a huge deal because of the rebate. Then again, it dropped in price the same amount two weeks later.

      Waiting two weeks would have kept the money in my pocket and I wouldn't have had to loan the computer company $250 for 2 months.

    4. Re:Mail-in sham... by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, people. Even most people who you'd consider dumb, tend to be somewhat sensible with their money. People check out the weekly circulars for Circuit City, Best Buy, Staples, Tweeter, Office Max, whoever, and go where the deals are. Most of the time these deals involve rebates.

      As for being cheaper online, at random, I looked up a hard drive from BestBuy.com (It's in their ad this week in the circular). Seagate Barracuda 120.0GB model number ST3120026A

      Best Buy's Price: $99.99 - $50 MIR = $49.99

      The Best Froogle could do wiht that same model number? $70 for a refurbished white box.

      Best Pricewatch could do for that drive? $62 (This was a diffrent model number, but to be fair, as far as I could tell, same specs. The same model number was $74)

      Best Pricewatch could do on ANY 120GB Drive? $53 for 5200RPM Drives.

      It's just one example picked at random. I'm sure if we wanted to get into a pissing contest, you could find plenty of stuff that's cheaper online than what BBY sells it for after rebates. Point is, they're not all just horrible ripoffs designed to fuck you in the ass. Get overyourself and take off the tinfoil hat.

    5. Re:Mail-in sham... by docflan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At random my ass. I invite every shopper to compare any Best Buy price to newegg.com. On anything. Newegg will generally beat Best Buy on any hard drive, optical drive, usb drive, DVD R media, CD media, monitor, printer, ... but I digress. And Newegg is not unbeatable either. Zipzoomfly.com beats them sometimes. Rima.com beats them sometimes. Best Buy is last in line, folks. The parent of this post is low-rent trolling at best. Representative of a clinical learning disability at worst.

    6. Re:Mail-in sham... by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Best Buy's Price: $99.99 - $50 MIR = $49.99

      The Best Froogle could do wiht that same model number? $70 for a refurbished white box.

      Best Pricewatch could do for that drive? $62 (This was a diffrent model number, but to be fair, as far as I could tell, same specs. The same model number was $74)


      Let's go with the $74 figure. That's $25.99 less than $99.99. The mail-in-rebate is $50. Which means you should go for the mail-in-rebate if you seriously expect there's a higher than 52% probability that it will actually pay out. (Disregarding the expense of time and effort to fill in and follow-up on the rebate, as well as any loss in value of the product because the warrantee is invalid if you send away the original UPC or purchase slip or whatever to get the rebate).

      Or, to put it like this; a probability of less than 48% than the rebate people will fuck you in the ass.

      If you like those odds, you might as well steal the product and take your chances with your cellmate.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    7. Re:Mail-in sham... by BinBoy · · Score: 1

      I wish I could get a $2 check.

      Symantec said my purchase date was invalid even though I purchased the software through a link on their own site. Then after cutting bar codes off boxes, photocopying, printing out and filling out a form, printing out my confirmation email and mailing everything in, Circuit City said the store I bought from wasn't participating in the offer even though I ordered from the Circuit City web site. This is a HUGE scam. Let's kill the rebates and show the real prices.

    8. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes Best Buy actually has a good deal. I needed a new small laptop and was interested in the Sharp MC24. I got it at best buy for $150 less than I could get it anywhere else. There is a $100 rebate, but it still means it was $50 less without the rebate. They are like most stores, some items will have a good price and they hope you also pick up a couple of other items that they make more profit on.

    9. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went ahead and bought 2 of those exact drives from the store when I saw them a month or two ago. What a bargain! I guess great minds think alike.

    10. Re:Mail-in sham... by jonnystiph · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which means you should go for the mail-in-rebate if you seriously expect there's a higher than 52% probability that it will actually pay out.

      I have to be honest. I am no fan of BestBuy or MIR. However, I have always got my MIR's back. I have never had any issue at all, sure it takes a little time, but mine always arrive.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    11. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who modded this up? The guy proved his point with research and examples. Then someone mentions a conspiracy theory and gets modded up too? Try addressing the point!

      Poster: 1 + 1 = 2.
      Reply: I see you used mathematical symbols, which indicates an obvious bias. I'm not saying your wrong, but it's worth being said.

    12. Re:Mail-in sham... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The thing I hate about rebates is that in Canada (well, ontario and most other provinces, excluding oil rich Alberta, because they don't have provincial sales tax) we pay 15% sales tax on computer products. So if you have $50 rebate, you pay an extra $7.50 in tax on that, and then when you get your rebate, you only get $50, so the rebate only ends up being $42.50. With an at purchase rebate, they aren't allowed to tax it, so an instant rebate of $50 would actually save you $57.50, because you're saving $50, plus the tax on $50.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Mail-in sham... by EchoMirage · · Score: 1

      as well as any loss in value of the product because the warrantee is invalid if you send away the original UPC or purchase slip or whatever to get the rebate

      The original UPC is of no consequence to your warranty, once you're past the 14- or 30-day return policy of the store. If a company ever requests the UPC to fulfill a product warranty, ask to speak to their head of counsel. As for the original purchase slip (receipt), it's acceptable to send in a photocopy. If you're denied because you send a facsimile, drop a short letter to your state Attorney General and explain the situation. They'll handle it from there.

    14. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "Jedem das Seine"?

    15. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misleading! That rebate says up to $50. The real rebate is $20.

    16. Re:Mail-in sham... by tlmatters · · Score: 2, Informative
      A hard drive is about the worst product to compare as margins on drives are extremely low.

      A better example would be a higher margin product, to see which seller is taking less of a profit, such as LCD monitors.

      Picked at random from Best Buy's web site:
      Samsung SyncMaster 213T Silver 21.3'' LCD Monitor

      Best Buys web price: $899.99 - 100.00 rebate = 799.99
      PriceGrabber best price (non refurb): $721.00
      (PriceGrabber lists 51 resellers for this part, so I didn't bother checking pricewatch or (gag)Froogle)

      The rule for everyone is, if you need it today buy it locally. If not, check it out locally and buy it online if you get a better deal.

      BTW, I used to own and operate an online reseller site. We refused to do rebates because they are designed to be horrible ripoffs and f*** you in the a**. Resellers count on the fact that most people don't ever pursue the rebate. Sure, it's the customer's fault for not doing their part, but it's the reseller's fault for exploiting the behaviour.

      This was one of the reasons we ended up closing our shop and going out of business, we couldn't be profitable without comprising our ethics. Both me and my business partner are Christians (I'm a baptist, he's a catholic)... both of us answer to Christ for our actions and that is much more important than making a business work by any means necessary.

      If the reseller or manufacturer is really willing to offer the after rebate price to each and every customer (1:1 ratio between a sale and the reduced price), they would simply lower the price on the item. By offering the rebate, the manufacturer and reseller are banking on the fact that the vast majority of customers don't ever file the rebate, thus they get the benefit of advertising a low price (after rebate) as well as the benefit of selling the item for more profit.
    17. Re:Mail-in sham... by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      I don't have to be honest... I am always honest. I dislike the MIR rebate "scam," but other than that, I like Best Buy. It has the best selection of... well, pretty much everything they carry in my area, and their prices are usually better for most items they carry.

      I have, however, sent in several $50 rebates and never received them.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    18. Re:Mail-in sham... by blixel · · Score: 1

      Rebates do make it seem like you are getting a deal, but you can go to one of Best Buy's competitors and buy the same item for Best Buy's price minus the rebate.

      I think the $25 I paid after rebate for that WD 200GB 8MB Cache 7200RPM was a pretty good deal. And that was over a year ago. If you can match that without a rebate even today, a full year later, I'd like to see it.

    19. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not going to wait 3 months for a 2 dollar check.
      How about for a $90 check?
    20. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people don't say MSFT here all the time...

    21. Re:Mail-in sham... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Not only that but some stores advertise a product as $99.99 (*) and then a explanation in small print says "after mail in rebate". So it actually costs $149.99 unless you jump through all the hoops required to get the difference refunded. I'm an occasional visitor to the US so I can't get a rebate at all and I was caught out by this once. To me this kind of deceptive pricing is tantamount to lying. If the store lies about the price, what does that say about them?

      Nowadays I explicitly avoid anything with rebate written on it. I'm sure many US residents do the same.

      Now, if only the tax was included in the price also...

    22. Re:Mail-in sham... by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Provided you actually honor rebates in a reasonable amount of time and without making the process too difficult for the customer, I don't see them as unethical. Annoying maybe, but not unethical. Some people simply aren't very careful with their money, and as a store owner that isn't your fault. You might stock your store with "loss leaders" that require someone to walk past more profitable items to get to, betting it will increase sales overall. This is not unethical, but once again you are betting on customers spending more money than they may have intended to.

    23. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this after rebates? This is what the discussion is about. Not any random item at Best Buy. No one made any claim about off the shelf prices as you are so heated to point out are not cheaper which I'm sure the parent poster would agree with. Come on and try to follow the conversation before frothing at the mouth clouds your understanding.

    24. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much was that shipping on the monitor? I think you left that part out. I've been pricing monitors lately and rarely is the shipping less than $35 - $50 dollars. Also, what company are you talking about, and how well do they honor their return policy? I would go with the $800 for the peice of mind that I can get the item fixed if it is broken, or return it locally. The $721 Plus say $35 Shipping only saves $44, but comes from a company I never heard of, in a state 3000 miles away. Your deal isn't much of a deal to me.

    25. Re:Mail-in sham... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's the customer's fault for not doing their part, but it's the reseller's fault for exploiting the behaviour.

      You clearly admit its the customers fault, yet you blame the offerer anyway?

      Both me and my business partner are Christians

      I see, you have thrown out anything logical, and just make things up or believe a book that was never proven to be the word of god. so tell me, which version of the bible do you believe and why do you believe it, knowing that MAN has altered it for our own purposes in the past?

    26. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always considered MIR to be a legalized Phishing scam, "full address, phone #, email addr, age, income, etc." where they get your personal information for free and for any purpose, and then do anything to avoid paying out money "illegible, copied, etc."

      I personally believe that the FTC ruling that retailers could be held legally liable for the failure of manufacturers to pay the MIR is the reason for this "change of policy", rather than any consumer upset.

    27. Re:Mail-in sham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen on that. Rebates are the sole reason why I was able to buy 60 CDRs for only the price of sales tax. Of course the state sales tax was lower back then, but that's another story....

    28. Re:Mail-in sham... by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      I applaud you for placing integrity over money. There are far too few people these days with that sort of character. If you were still in business, I'd buy from you in a heartbeat.

    29. Re:Mail-in sham... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Mail In rebates are a sham, in that it takes 8-12 weeks for the check to come in. I am not going to wait 3 months for a 2 dollar check.

      I agree. Why not just lower the price the cost of the rebate or offer an "instant" rebate at the cash register? Why force people to go through the trouble of waiting months for their money when you've promised it to them anyway. Rebates are definitely scummy, but that doesn't stop me from taking advantage of them. I bought a $180 Hitachi 250GB drive Thursday and I'll be sending in the two $40 mail in rebates next week. Usually I don't bother if it's just a couple of bucks... I let my wife fill those out and send them in. Then when the $5 check comes it's like a suprise. $80 on the other hand is well worth the time it takes to fill out the forms, make photocopies, and cut out barcodes.

    30. Re:Mail-in sham... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You clearly admit its the customers fault, yet you blame the offerer anyway?

      Yup. Like in car sales. The buyers often feel bad the next day. Why? Because they feel they were pressured into something they didn't really want/couldn't afford. The salesmen know the tricks to get people to buy things they wouldn't have bought otherwise and purposefully act in a manner contrary to the best interests of the consumer.

      Are you saying that a salesman that knowingly acts in a manner contrary to the best interests of the customer is blameless when the customer is coerced into the action that harms them?

    31. Re:Mail-in sham... by docflan · · Score: 1

      An anonymous coward spat:
      Is this after rebates? This is what the discussion is about.(sic)

      Yes, one can find merchandise online that is cheaper WITHOUT rebates than Best Buy products WITH rebates. Without trying very hard.

    32. Re:Mail-in sham... by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that a salesman that knowingly acts in a manner contrary to the best interests of the customer is blameless when the customer is coerced into the action that harms them?

      What was this coercion? Were they holding a gun to your head? Threatening your family? No, there was salesmanship going on here, but you were not coerced into buying that car; you just wanted to and let yourself be swayed.

      When I went to buy a car, the first dealership I went to wouldn't bother to pay any attention, so I left. The next one (Lombard Toyota, on Roosevelt Ave in Lombard, IL) used every scammy auto-dealer trick in the book. Made me wait forever, had to "go talk with his manager/financial guy", suddenly told me the model I was looking at was "just sold by another salesman, but would I like to look at...". Did I feel bad about it the next morning?

      No, becaue I got up and LEFT.

      I then called Oakbrook Toyota (Ogden Ave, Westmont, IL) and not only got someone who said he had a car just traded in that was what I wanted, but he negotiated a good deal right there on the phone. When I showed up, he shaved off another grand without even being asked. We bargained on my trade-in, reached a consensus in about 15 minutes (I got the Blue Book value), and after a half hour of paperwork I drove out. I got the car for less than I thought I would, with no pressure, quickly and efficiently. I've now been driving it for 80,000 miles, with nary a hiccup, and I've taken it back for all of my service (which has been priced very honestly and reasonably). Anyone reading this post from the Oak Brook, IL area, drop in there - great place.

      So if you were "coerced" into buying the wrong car at the wrong price, then yes, I'm placing the blame on YOU. The salesman is doing his job, and if you don't like his tactics or the car, then you can get up and walk out.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    33. Re:Mail-in sham... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Yup. Like in car sales. The buyers often feel bad the next day.

      Its not like in car sales. In rebates, you're usually spending at most a few hundred dollars. With a car thats easliy 15,000.

      Because they feel they were pressured into something they didn't really want/couldn't afford. The salesmen know the tricks to get people to buy things they wouldn't have bought otherwise and purposefully act in a manner contrary to the best interests of the consumer.

      Give me a fucking break. I'm sorry that people are so weak willed that someone can be 'pressured' into buy a car. No one forced a gun to thier head. I deal with high pressure salesmen by leaving, as I don't want to put up with thier shit. But no amount of thier talking will make me buy a car on the spot. Sorry, if people really have that much of a problem with being pressured, then ya, its thier fault...they need some backbone.


      Are you saying that a salesman that knowingly acts in a manner contrary to the best interests of the customer is blameless when the customer is coerced into the action that harms them?


      Yes, it is the customers fault. Grow a backbone already. As long as the salesman is truthful (and yes, the rebate forms ARE truthful) then there is no one to blame but the customer.

      People need to learn self control, they have only themselves to blame if they are so easily maniupulated.

    34. Re:Mail-in sham... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      You have somewhat of a point. It was not random in the sense that I intentionally picked a product wiht a mail-in rebate with which to illustrate my point. However, I just picked the first product with a Mail-In Rebate that I saw. Random enough for me at least. Though it makes sense that the first I saw, was the one displayed most prominently.

    35. Re:Mail-in sham... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Since you brought it up, in the interest of full discolsure, yes, I work for Best Buy. I don't think I have any particularly fierce loyalty to them. They're just annother company. A company that I feel is making some very smart moves in this industry but that's just me. I'm not anything fancy with them, like with Best Buy corperate, or anything, I'm just a computer dept supervisor (hourly wages, no bonuses or commission anything like that).

      I don't particularly like Mail In Rebates myself, just wanted to illustrate that they're not this evil thing designed to steal from you. They let us advertise lower prices, and make more money at the same time. Unfortunatly, because of the complexity of the system, sometimes people get burned. Sometimes they burn themselves by not sending the rebate in at all, and all the time, you have to wait.

      It's a compromise. And apparently, BBY is deciding that it wants a diffrent compropise now.

    36. Re:Mail-in sham... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As long as the salesman is truthful (and yes, the rebate forms ARE truthful) then there is no one to blame but the customer.

      But what about buying a car? "Yes, you can afford the car that is $10,000 outside your price range." "Wow, you look good in that car, you'll get all the chicks." "This car's safety is so good that you can drive like the moron you are, and your children will be protected." An "exaggeration" is a falshood told by the salesman to sell the car. When the salesman is lying like that, should the customer still hold 100% of the responsibility to determine which statements are lies? Or are is the customer being preyed upon by slimy salesmen?

    37. Re:Mail-in sham... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      But what about buying a car?

      This thread is about MIRs. However, I'd still like to refute your silly scenarios.

      "Yes, you can afford the car that is $10,000 outside your price range."

      You as a consumer should know what you can afford and whatyou can't. Are you honestly telling me you go shopping for a car you don't have some idea if you can afford the monthly payment or not? The buyer is responsible for figuring out how to pay for things. If i get a credit card and run it up without thinking about how to pay it down, wouldn't that be my fault?

      "Wow, you look good in that car, you'll get all the chicks."

      Surely you know that he can't possibly promise that. Any reasonable person wouldn't put any value in such a statement.

      "This car's safety is so good that you can drive like the moron you are, and your children will be protected."

      Again, any reasonable person will know this is not true. If someone takes as more than 'this car is exceptionally safe' they are being foolish.

      An "exaggeration" is a falshood told by the salesman to sell the car.

      And all of said 'falsehoods' above are immediately apparent to an average person. Exaggeration is done to make a point; lying is done to deceive.

      When the salesman is lying like that, should the customer still hold 100% of the responsibility to determine which statements are lies? Or are is the customer being preyed upon by slimy salesmen?

      I think I countered each of those already, and yes, all of those statements fall to the customer to determine (which, by they way, they should be easily capable of figuring out. If not..well, they must be incredibly naive and stupid).

    38. Re:Mail-in sham... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think I countered each of those already, and yes, all of those statements fall to the customer to determine (which, by they way, they should be easily capable of figuring out. If not..well, they must be incredibly naive and stupid).

      Which is contrary to the previous statements that the customer is responsible except in case of deception. You believe that the customer is responsible even in the case of fraud. You obvisouly think that people should be responsible for their actions and all the consequences, but that companies/corporations are not responsible for their fraud. Too bad Enron is gone, or you would have fit in there nicely.

    39. Re:Mail-in sham... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Which is contrary to the previous statements that the customer is responsible except in case of deception. You believe that the customer is responsible even in the case of fraud.

      None of those examples you provided were fraud. Would you believe me if i told you you could lift 100lbs when the max you've lifted ever has been 25lbs? If so, why? Because I was smiling as I said it?

      'You can drive like a moron this car is so safe' is an obvious metaphor. The keyword is 'like.' A is like b indicates a metaphor, this is elementry school English.

      'This car has side impact airbags' is a statement of fact, and if the car DOESN'T have airbags, most certainliy is fraud. Fortunatly specs about a cars are commonly published and easily available in today's world, when years ago you may have only had the word of the dealer.

      You obvisouly think that people should be responsible for their actions and all the consequences, but that companies/corporations are not responsible for their fraud.

      I certainly think companies should be held accountable for fraud. However none of the car dealership examples you gave are examples of fraud.
      Hell, one is entirely subjective and may very well be true (i'm sure there is at lesat one woman that would find someone sexy in just about any car).
      I did provide one fraudlent example though. In that case the dealer has no business saying what he did.

      Another example of fraud was when Verizion wireless told me 'yes, i have coverage in this area.' Later, when i found i had no signal and complained they explained that meant only that, if i should happen to get a signal, it would come off my plan minutes. The map they had shown me was where my minutes applied, NOT where there was signal. THAT is fraud.

    40. Re:Mail-in sham... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The keyword is 'like.' A is like b indicates a metaphor, this is elementry school English.

      Good. For a minute there, I thought you might actually know what you are talking about. When you don't know the difference between a simile and a metaphor, yet proceed to inform others incorrectly about such figures of speech, then I'm quite confident that whether or not you do know the difference between fraud and good salesmanship is irrelevant to you spewings here.

    41. Re:Mail-in sham... by Kastigador · · Score: 1

      I work at Best Buy and I've shopped at them long before I started working there. I have always shopped online, but sometimes the rebate deals Best Buy offers simply can't be beat. It's not entirely true that their competitors offer cheaper prices, normally they don't(and they also have lots of rebates). Online retail is a mixed bag. I will often times price shop for things online and end up going with the rebate offer because it is a significantly better deal. Truth be told, rebates are a financial trick for manufacturers and retail. It allows them to push surplus at a heavy discount, without immediately taking a hit to their earnings etc. It encourages greater cash flow(which is HUGE) and allows them to manipulate the numbers slightly for their shareholders to see. Problem is, the actual clearing centers are most likely outsourced by the companies behind all this. I also believe they probably have a deal where the center guarantess a certain clearance rate(hence the f'd up situation we're all in now). I have no doubt in my mind that the companies are probably paying a set sum to these clearance companies(based on their monthly sales, etc) and whatever it ends up being over or under is the clearance houses problem or benefit. This explains why we never see those rebates when we clearly sent them out correctly. True, you can pursue them and go after people to get your money, but time is money, and who should have to spend their precious free time hounding a company that clearly owes them money? It's the fault of the companies behind this system, not necessarily Best Buy. Best Buy is taking a very noble step here, as it is unlikely their competitors will do that same. At the same time, I have no doubt in my mind this has to do with lawsuits. In Ohio, Best Buy was being sued for all sorts of things. Everything from their service plans being a rip off, to rebates not being paid out in time. I honestly believe Best Buy did not have evil intentions to rip off consumers, but rather an interest in innovating on ways to maximize how much volume they can move through their stores. Anymore, electronics are becoming commodity items(Best Buy makes almost 0 profit on desktop computers, for instance). The only way for them to stay competitive is be an electronics Wal-Mart of sorts. Push so much volume you can strong arm your suppliers into lowering their prices for you.

    42. Re:Mail-in sham... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sorry asshole, I got them backwards. Sue me.

      Nice of you to ignore the rest of my post, which, dispite a simple mix up, is still valid.

      But go ahead if you think that totally invalidates everything i've said, feel free. Its easier that way, you can ignore that you really don't know the difference between fraud and good salesman ship. Dig your head back into the sand (or ass, as thats where its seems to be most comfortable) and believe whatever you like.

      I'll still enjoy paying less for the same exact things you buy.

  5. Too Good to be True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this was posted only 15 minutes later I'd be dancing in the streets. Instead I'm going to cry myself to sleep over yet another beautiful thing that will never see the light of day.

  6. It's like printing your own money by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It takes 1 minute to fill out the postcard and less than half a dollar to mail it off. I don't understand anyone who doesn't mail it off for their rebate.

    Unless you're making $30.00 each minute ($1,800/hr), you're just wasting perfectly good money.

    Does this mean that Best Buy won't be having rebates anymore?

    1. Re:It's like printing your own money by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I think it's more a matter of memory than inconvenience.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    2. Re:It's like printing your own money by sulli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People forget, miss the deadline, etc. Non-return of rebates is critical to the business model. Best Buy just decieded that the dollar value of the customer annoyance was greater than the rebate non-returns.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:It's like printing your own money by SerialEx13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't ship it registered, what's stopping the company from saying it never got there? I've heard of people who have waited over a year and have hassled the company numerous times to finally get their rebate. I got two items with a mail-in rebate on Boxing Day (December 26), I got the $10 cheque, but am still awaiting the $60 cheque.

      Some businesses will instead just give you the discount at the till and do the work themselves for the rebate.

      The only real major downside to getting rid of rebates is that in reality only a very small (less than 10 per cent) of people fill them out which means that in theory they can offer larger rebates for those who do. Of course, that's only in theory.

    4. Re:It's like printing your own money by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      SerialEx13 is right on the money. I put in for a $50 rebate on a HDD. Bought the thing September '04. The rebate form, reciept copy, and bottom panel of the box went into the mail the same day. It's now April '05 and three calls and 1 fax to Best Buy have given me nothing but one long distance fax charge and no rebate yet.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    5. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must keep your receipt for some time in case you have to return the item.. say.. 30 days. By then you know if it works right, but you've lost the receipt. If you're disorganized. Which I am.

    6. Re:It's like printing your own money by Hellad · · Score: 1

      The problem comes from the occasions when companies don't send the checks. Numerous phone calls and emails later, my brother is still waiting for a rebate from Tivo from a year ago. Mail-in rebates are a pain in the ass.

    7. Re:It's like printing your own money by JVert · · Score: 1

      Fucking office gnomes stole my boxes in the night along with my UPC.

    8. Re:It's like printing your own money by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      actually the trend in the last couple of years is 70+% redemption, meaning they arent nearly as profitable as they used to be.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    9. Re:It's like printing your own money by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Well. It depends. Some want a photocopy of the receipt and an original UPC, and some want the original receipt and a photocopy and original UPC and some want block letters and some want you to sign in block letters and some want your cat's collar and some want things they didn't put in the rebate form and some want an orignal rebate form and a copy of your dog's left paw and they don't tell you that because they don't want to give you money and if by chance you did everything right you'll get a rebate.

      In 6-18 months.

      Wait, it got here to us a day late. No rebate for you.

    10. Re:It's like printing your own money by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      I make .33 a minute... but I figure if I can work a square decade I should be set...

    11. Re:It's like printing your own money by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Best Buy's registers automatically print out a seperate rebate receipt that you mail in.

    12. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I'd say that's the biggest problem. You relinquish control over your dollars once you purchase the product. You now rely on the company's good faith to fulfill the rebate. That's assuming you actually bothered to fill out the rebate form and sent it off...

    13. Re:It's like printing your own money by Surye · · Score: 1

      I do rebates often at work, as the 5 minutes of my time at $13.20/hr(my first job) is worth $30-$60 in the mail. We buy a lot of software and networking equipment(netgear especially) that has such rebates. And we have a folder of open rebates, and a folder of closed. The open one is pretty empty right now. Something must be working.

    14. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It takes 1 minute to fill out the postcard and less than half a dollar to mail it off. I don't understand anyone who doesn't mail it off for their rebate.

      Unless you're making $30.00 each minute ($1,800/hr), you're just wasting perfectly good money.


      Quit fooling yourself. It does NOT take 1 minute.

      1. Fill out rebate form.
      2. Make photocopy of receipt and circle purchase.
      3. Cut out bar code.
      4. Find envelope (every 100 envelopes or so, you'll have to organize to get more).
      5. Fill out envelope.
      6. Find stamp.
      7. Make photocopies of everything you are sending.
      8. Mark date on calender on date you are supposed to receive rebate.
      [this is where we branch]
      [branch #1: several weeks later]
      9. Find copies of rebate that is marked as *should be received by now*
      10. Find phone number on company that's supposed to have sent you rebate
      11. Call phone # to find out why no rebate has been received.
      12. Listen to someone giving you the run-around
      13. Realize you are fucked
      [branch #2: couple of weeks later]
      9. Receive email about why rebate was declined. One of:
      - UPC code missing.
      - purchase not circled.
      - unreadable submission.
      - that address was already registered.
      - other lie.
      10. Goto 10 of branch #1
      [branch #3: couple of weeks later]
      9. receive email about rebate accepted.
      10. never receive rebate and forget about it.

      Rebates are a SCAM. And they bloody well know it. It's actually a very simple scheme: the majority of people will never send it in. Then the majority of people who get declined, will not follow up. At the end they are left with a very low percentage of actual payouts, many MANY weeks after the original purchase.

      I applaud Best Buy and hope many will follow. (Fry's, are you listening?!).

    15. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SerialEx13 is right on the money.

      Odd how he's at "Score:1" right now and you're at Score:4, Insightful"....

    16. Re:It's like printing your own money by Viv · · Score: 1

      I had a rebate on a TiVo from best buy literally "bounce" in the mail. The address they gave me to send the rebate was bogus.

      In my mind, rebate == fraud. I don't even look at rebates as part of the price anymore; "$99 after $50 rebate" == "$149" to me.

    17. Re:It's like printing your own money by schtum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People who forget or otherwise choose not to send in their rebate forms have no reason to be annoyed with anyone other than themselves. The big problem is when people uphold their end of the bargain and the company fails to uphold theirs.

      Personally, I have yet to be stiffed, but two rebates I mailed in for my parents when they bought cell phones were rejected on the grounds that the second month's bill didn't show that the first month's balance was paid in full. Bullshit. There was a large number next to "previous month's balance" and a zero next to "current balance". I even circled it for them so they wouldn't miss it.

      One angry email later, they promised to review my claim, and my parents did receive a rebate check for one phone. As for the second phone, they claimed not to have a rebate form in their system. Again, BS. How could they send me a rejection notice for a rebate form they never received? They either lost it or threw it out because they didn't feel like paying it.

      Another angry email followed, and now they're asking me to fax my supporting documentation, which I plan on doing (always keep copies of rebate forms/receipts, etc, until you have the check). It almost seems like a game to see who will get tired of squabbling over a few measly bucks first. If it were my own money and not my parents, I'm not sure I'd still be fighting.

    18. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check where it was mailed too. Most rebates are offered by the Manufacturer. Take this from someone who (unfortunately) works at best buy, in between real jobs. And I'm posting Anonymously so my Karma doesn't get shit on.

    19. Re:It's like printing your own money by Mancat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most rebates that I've seen are offered by a third party, and not by the manufacturer. I don't even know how that works.

      I bought a laptop from BestBuy a year ago. It was a Compaq model, so the rebate was coming from HP. I sent it off to their third-party rebate refunder, and when I finally received a response, they told my I had missed the deadline. I mailed a day after I bought the laptop, and the deadline was six months away.

      Honestly, I didn't even bother to fight it. It's just $100, and was not worth the trouble. That's probably exactly what they're hoping you'll think when they refuse to honor their rebate. Based on that experience, I'll never buy anything with a mail-in rebate again.

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    20. Re:It's like printing your own money by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      you see thats how rebates work , the minute you have spent that 50 on complaint letters/phone-calls/etc(which the company recoups in phone revenue/ recycling//etc) your rebate will magical arrive ,.
      Please read the fine print in future before moaning

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    21. Re:It's like printing your own money by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Here is an experiemnt. Find out how much profit $30 to $60 of company fund could make if you gave you company that much money for 6 weeks. (adjust it for a user if your just a consumer). Then add the 5 minutes of $13.20/hour and subtract the $30 to $60.

      Do you really have a positive return? in most cases the same stuff can be found around the same "after rebate" price in various locations.once you find these locations, it might be worth more to just buy it without a rebate. Once you start finding them you will know were to look so it shouldn't take much longer to look then it would to fill out the rebate.

    22. Re:It's like printing your own money by amembleton · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a trading standards body that you can complain to?

    23. Re:It's like printing your own money by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Dang rubber envelopes...

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    24. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think 30% isn't anything, then PLEASE send me 30% of your paycheck.

    25. Re:It's like printing your own money by mrsev · · Score: 1

      ..you from UK ? ...sounds very English , Trading standards as opposed to the US style UFIA (or whatever they have)

    26. Re:It's like printing your own money by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

      I just got a response to the first of 3 rebates I had to file for Tax Cut. No Rebate: Invalid Declaration Control Number, which was copied directly from the program. 1 down, 2 to go. This means that it cost at least 40.00 to do taxes my way, instead of 25. It took as long to do all their BS paperwork as it did to do my taxes.

      Next year I will have to do taxes the old fashioned way.

    27. Re:It's like printing your own money by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll agree on steps 1-8, so we're good on that. There's 5 minutes.

      However, maybe I've just been lucky, but except for the time I forgot to send in a rebate, every rebate I've sent in has come back good. (Out of, I dunno, 10 or 15 rebates. Mostly for CD-Rs.) So it proceeds as:

      9. Get check
      10. Take it to the bank.

      So there's 15 minutes.

      If I have the choice between getting something at store A where it costs $x after a rebate and store B where it costs $(x+10) but no rebate, I will go to store A in a heartbeat. (Of course, if it's the same price or much closer, I'll get it at the non-rebate place. And $10 is probably about right for a $100 item; adjust it a little depending on the price.)

    28. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, if you set up next to a WalMart or other outlet that rings up their sales wirelessly, you can just grab a whole bunch of rebate forms from the store (stealing those aren't illegal!), buy a thermal printer from ebay, buy/return rebate items (minus bar code) and you could well end up making $1800 an hour.

    29. Re:It's like printing your own money by amembleton · · Score: 1

      Yes I am from the UK. I don't know what the US has but I would have thought that for a free-market to operate well (in the intrest of consumers), a trading standards body would be expected.

      They probably call it something else, but there must be some government body that can investigate and charge companies, that don't honour thier rebates.

      Mind you, that would explain why rebates are pretty rare in the UK.

    30. Re:It's like printing your own money by mrsev · · Score: 1

      >Mind you, that would explain why rebates are pretty rare in the UK. ... I also think that we wouldnt stand for it. If I see some thing advertized for 100 and I get to the shop and they ask me to pay 150 I would have a very loud and public fit. I woulc ask for the manager and make a formal complaint.

      The principle for any exchange is they will do what they can get away with.

      In the same way in the EU telemarketers are pretty rare. We simply dont like it and will tell them so. ...OK yes I am interested in XYZ let me just get a pen and paper...and leave them on hold to make some tea and watch a movie.

    31. Re:It's like printing your own money by andrew71 · · Score: 5, Funny


      10. Goto 10 of branch #1

      No GOTOs here, please. Clean up your code.

      --
      13-4=54/6
    32. Re:It's like printing your own money by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      You forgot:

      0. Buy a molecular assembler to build letters small enough to fit inside those tiny boxes on the form while still remaining legible.

      Seriously, I'm a 30-something with excellent eyesight and steady hands. If I can barely fill one out with an engineering pen, how's grandma ever going to make it?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    33. Re:It's like printing your own money by amembleton · · Score: 1
      In the same way in the EU telemarketers are pretty rare. We simply dont like it and will tell them so. ...OK yes I am interested in XYZ let me just get a pen and paper...and leave them on hold to make some tea and watch a movie.

      Or, if you are in the UK join the telephone preference service. That seems to prevent telemarketers, and you can add your mobile to stop getting junk texts.

    34. Re:It's like printing your own money by SilentScream · · Score: 1
      Seems like a lot of trolls on this topic but since I don't have any mod points right now, I'm going to fall for the bait from those of you who feel rebates are a good thing and relate my recent experiences (not specifically Best Buy but indicative of the rebate experience in my opinion):

      Almost 2 years ago I thought I had learned my lesson after submitting rebate requests for 2 Hitachi disk drives. The amounts were large (close to $100 each if I remember correctly) and I never saw a check.

      So recently I purchased a Canon 20D camera, with an extra zoom, and a flash. Canon currently has a rather complicated rebate program where if you buy 2 or more of certain items you get a rebate and there is a multiplying factor if you buy more than 2 qualifying products. Here is the sequence of events to date:

      1. Prepared rebate request including carefully studying the request form (some products activate the rebate multiplier but don't actually qualify for a rebate amount themselves)and filling it out, making copies of the CORRECT UPC labels, cutting out the CORRECT box flaps with the item logos, making copies of the warranty cards, making a copy of the store invoice, and preparing an envelope with the CORRECT address. All this plus re-checking everything to make sure I followed all the detailed instructions has already consumed almost an hour of my time plus the cost of the copies and envelope.

      2. Go to the post office and purchase a "certificate of mailing" to send the request. I don't know if this would actually help to prove anything since its not "registered mail" and even registered mail doesn't prove you actually included something in the envelope but it makes me feel better. This adds another 75 cents (I think thats what the certificate cost) plus my time at the post office.

      3. More than 2 months later I get a $20 rebate check for the flash (Yay!) and a rejection notice for the $30 rebate for the lens (Boo!). The rejection slip says that "records indicate that the lens number is a duplicate".

      4. I call the rebate center call center. The person verifies that my lens number was apparently entered into their system correctly but they show a previous rebate issued for that number. I ask if she can check the details of the previous submission (after all, everybody has to submit everything but their @%^&$! birth certificate to get the rebate, right?). She does not have access to that information. I ask how I can escalate the issue since I purchased the stuff from a completely legitimate retailer (Amazon). She says that I can't escalate. More time invested.

      5. Not willing to give up yet and assuming I have been dealing with an outsourced rebate center, I call the Canon customer support line. Nice lady gives me another number to call.

      6. I call the new number and it is another outsourced rebate center that Canon uses but they are not handling the specific rebate that I have submitted.

      7. I call the Canon customer support line again. This time the call center person escalates me almost immediately to a supervisor (without my asking, Yay!). She takes my info and says a Canon person will contact me. I started to vent a little bit at this point and I have to say she "handled" me very well.

      8. The same day (Yay!) a Canon rep calls back but I'm not home. A day later I call her back. She asks that I fax her copies of all the stuff I originally submitted (luckily I still have them). She is giving me positive vibes that things are going to work out to my favor.

      9. I fax all the info although it had been some time since I had used my PC to fax so it took some time before I was able to get all 8 (!) pages to fax succesfully. I included a copy of the check and rejection notice I received and just for good measure, I sent a scan of the back of my lens with the engraved serial number. Probably won't even be visible on a fax but it made me feel better :).

      10. Two days later I receive an e-mail from the Canon pe

    35. Re:It's like printing your own money by $1uck · · Score: 1

      I've bought several items online (TigerDirect) and at office depot and office max that had rebates, often multiple rebates on one item. I've always filled out the rebate form, and have always gotten my rebate. In the case of tigerdirect it took almost a year but I did get them. I think most people are just to lazy/forgetful.

    36. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you're funny.

      This is the US! We don't operate in the interest of the consumer, only for the interests of the corporation. Since the corporations need the consumers, we just assume they will take care of the interests of the consumer.

      That's why all of our major regulatory boards are powerless and staffed with industry insiders that they are supposed to regulate.

      Examples:
      - The USDA cannot order a recall of meat that is contaminated; the company has the power to decide to do that, and the USDA has to beg them for it.

      - The FDA's highest executives all own huge amounts of stock in the pharmaceutical companies they regulate.

      - The FCC is lobbying Congress to try to increase media ownership rules so that fewer and fewer megacorps can own the radio, television and newspaper industries. They've already broken down the barriers between these industries...it used to be illegal to own both a radio station and a television station in the same city, but not any more, leading to one corporate entity making all of the decisions about what news will be aired and what entertainment will be shown.

    37. Re:It's like printing your own money by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps, they got tired of people actually following up on the rebates, and they were losing money anyway. Well, maybe not, maybe I have too much faith. /always sends in MIRs, always received said check

    38. Re:It's like printing your own money by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      GOTOs are fine as long as you don't have dozens of them all over the same function/procedure turning it into a speghetti mess.

    39. Re:It's like printing your own money by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Back in July last year, I, stupidly, bought a Kingston 512MB DIMM from Frys, which of course, had a $30 rebate. The Phoenix AZ rebate house they use seemed real inept, as they kept claiming they didn't have my info. Finally, in December, last year, I got fed up, and, using planetfeedback, complained to Kingston directly. Funny thing, I got an email in a couple of days after posting the complaint, from a very nice lady at Kingston who magically got my rebate, in only an additional 2 weeks, after the planetfeedback complaint... Seems that planetfeedback works wonderfully when you use words in your complaint, such as "fraud", and "State Attorney General"....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    40. Re:It's like printing your own money by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I'm right with you... In the past year or two I've filed rebates on:

      A few CD-R and DVD-R packs (very little)
      Epson Photo820 Printer (30 IIRC?)
      WD 120gb HDD (20 IIRC?)
      WD 200gb HDD (20 IIRC?)
      SE T-710 Phones (200)
      Samsung Syncmaster 712N (70 IIRC)

      With the 712N I could've actually gotten it online a little cheaper but online places are sticklers with their dead pixel policy whereas Circuit City will take back anything.

      Going back further there was a ~200 rebate on a laptop, a ~20 rebate on a video card. I got a Canon ip5000 coming soon with a $20 MIR ($133 shipped AR... that's a steal!)... and that's all I can remember off the top of my head.

      I can't recall getting screwed a single time. The Photo820 rebate was reject because I actually did sent it in after the 'postmark by' date and I had to call Amazon because I only recieved 1 of the T-Mobile rebates but they were friendly and efficient -- in fact they cut me a check directly which arrived a few days later.

      I like rebates. If one can get it cheaper online or at another retailler, great. Please tell me where. Until then, I'll happily use the rebates to save $20 over the next guy.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    41. Re:It's like printing your own money by sulli · · Score: 1
      Of course the seller "forgets." The seller gets the float on the money until the rebate finally arrives.

      This is also why rebates are now offered as prepaid Visa cards. The cash stays in the company's account until the moment you spend it - and if you forget, well, they keep it!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    42. Re:It's like printing your own money by beetle99 · · Score: 1

      Fry's probably won't listen, as this a major reason many people buy from them (or Outpost.com), and the rebates don't really come out of their pockets. Rebates are really easy for stores like Fry's, CompUSA, etc. because the store gets full credit for the sales figures, which is what the bean-counters want to see.

      I think that it's great that Best Buy is taking a stand on this, and I agree that it would be great if more retailers follow suit. But I am skeptical that Fry's will be one of them.

      For myself, I've been burned too many times with rebates and the hassle posted above. I'm not ever considering rebates as a means of saving money on a purchase. I'll go with the lowest up-front price that I can find.

    43. Re:It's like printing your own money by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Rebates are a SCAM. And they bloody well know it. It's actually a very simple scheme: the majority of people will never send it in.

      Nobody is forcing you to buy an item with a rebate. If you don't like it then buy something else. Personally I love rebates and have always gotten my money back, but I consider it more of an unexpected suprise. I fill out the rebate, send in the receipts and barcodes, etc. I never bother to really photocopy anything unless I remember to take it to work and use the copier there, but I usually forget. Stuff it all in an envelope, drop it in the mail, and forget about it. If it comes, hey, it's a check for $50. If it doesn't big whoop, I wasn't really expecting it anyway and $50 isn't going to mean the difference between eating that week or not. I always assume the rebate will never come so I'm always happy when it does. You just need to learn to be more pessimistic and assume you're not going to get the money. It seems like you're 90% of the way there though so keep up the good work. ;-)

    44. Re:It's like printing your own money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No GOTOs here, please. Clean up your code.

      Heh. How could I pass up on a "10. goto 10"? :)

      But yeah, sorry, it won't happen again. ;)

    45. Re:It's like printing your own money by autophile · · Score: 1

      You forgot the steps to go through even if you get your rebate check:

      R1: Store check in safe place.
      R2: Get in car.
      R3: Get out of car, get check you forgot, get in car.
      R4: Drive to bank.
      R5: Fill out deposit slip.
      R6: Wait in line.
      R7: Wait at teller.
      R8: Drive home.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
  7. Wait...is this serious? by thephotoman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Honestly, as it's still April Fool's on the West Coast of the US, I'm having a hard time buying the story.

    If it is indeed true and not a part of the crapflood that is 1 April, then damn, what will I do with the extra postage?

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    1. Re:Wait...is this serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Heeeeeey it has been reported by the Star Tribune!

      Here in Minnesota, if you tell a lie, they'll throw you to the thin ice, naked. Specially if you are a young woman of scandinavian descent.

      No April's fool exception!

      In other news, Oleg Daal, a Minnesota resident has reported that he saw two identical snowflakes.

    2. Re:Wait...is this serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Wait...is this serious?"

      What do *you* think? [rolls eyes]

    3. Re:Wait...is this serious? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Something being reported in the Star Tribune lends no credence to it being truthful, accurate or factual.

      But, fortunately, the Best Buy thing is true.

    4. Re:Wait...is this serious? by Ministry+of+Cube · · Score: 1

      RTFA and look at the date, April 2nd.

    5. Re:Wait...is this serious? by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you would believe if you have been reading stories here and elsewhere about Best Buy getting out of the low-end consumer electronics market.

      More and more BB's are trying to be high-end stores, with employees in these "Test" stores" trained to look for certain types of customers and show them to the high-end equipment.

      The BB president said himself he would love to get rid of the customers who just come in to buy the low-end stuff, try to manipulate rebates and/or sell those products on EBay.

      This is in response to the projection that BestBuy will eventually be passed by Walmart in 1-2 years as the #1 home electronics seller in the US.

    6. Re:Wait...is this serious? by Balthisar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about your Wal-Marts, but ours have crappy selection, and generally only the very low models of any brand. So obviously I just *can't wait* until it's the only option in town :-(

      --
      --Jim (me)
  8. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it be that we're finally nearing the end of one of the most hated marketing ploys of all? No.

  9. Re:April fools day is over by momerath2003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Associated Press doesn't pull April Fools jokes, methinks.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  10. good riddence to a scam by sfcat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rebates have already been kinda of a scam. They make it as hard as possible to get them, but advertise the price after rebate. Meanwhile they are playing the float with your money. Its not that bad b/c they do pay after you jump through many hoops but they count on people not putting up with the hassle. This is a good bet b/c people value their time and sanity.

    I'm glad that I'll never have to put up with these tatics from BestBuy again (not that I ever did, I use pricewatch and Fry's for my hardware needs).

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    1. Re:good riddence to a scam by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1, Interesting

      blockquoth the poster:

      I'm glad that I'll never have to put up with these tatics from BestBuy again (not that I ever did, I use pricewatch and Fry's for my hardware needs)

      A month a go I built a new system from components, which I got at Frys ( too impatient to wait for NewEgg ). 2/3 of the ~20 components had rebates. As i think back, it seems that ~ 1/2 of the things i ever bought at Frys had rebates. they even print the rebates on the cash register reciept for you.

      so i have no idea what you're buying at Frys that don't have rebates, but it's probibaly not made of silicon. are you the guy i always see in the hentai animi section ?

    2. Re:good riddence to a scam by toddestan · · Score: 5, Funny

      A month a go I built a new system from components, which I got at Frys ( too impatient to wait for NewEgg ). 2/3 of the ~20 components had rebates. As i think back, it seems that ~ 1/2 of the things i ever bought at Frys had rebates. they even print the rebates on the cash register reciept for you.

      Let me get this straight. You were too impatient for newegg.com, but you are willing to deal with the hassle of trying to collect on 13 to 14 rebates? That just boggles the mind.

    3. Re:good riddence to a scam by blixel · · Score: 1

      Rebates have already been kinda of a scam. They make it as hard as possible to get them

      I must be the luckiest person on the planet then. I've never had a problem getting a rebate that was offered. Takes all of 2 minutes to write out my name and address and mail in the form. Whether I get the check 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, or 52 weeks later, it really doesn't matter. Not sending in for it is the only assurance that I'll never get it.

    4. Re:good riddence to a scam by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Oh you are so right, you've got to play to win...

      But then that is how you lose too.

    5. Re:good riddence to a scam by beacher · · Score: 1

      In case you've never seen this before - Here's Maddox's suggestion to CompUSA in order to help them become a better store. Yes he does rant on rebates .. ;)

      Enjoy!

    6. Re:good riddence to a scam by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      Rebates have already been kinda of a scam. They make it as hard as possible to get them, but advertise the price after rebate.
      • I won't disagree that rebates are a bit of a scam, and the whole advertising the price after rebate most definitely is, but sometimes rebates can make for some very good deals. I watch deal sites and research my buys, I'll take a rebate offer if the savings are significant. Back in January I got an AMD 64 3400+ CPU, Asus A8V Deluxe motherboard, a Soyo case (I don't remember the model name) along with some crappy keyboard, mouse and speakers for $399 with a mail-in rebate for $100 on the CPU. This was with TigerDirect who uses OnRebate so I had my $100 back in about 2 weeks sitting in my Paypal account.
      • Looking at PriceGrabber right now, the best I can find the CPU and Motherboard are $207 and $110. The prices were a bit higher back when I bought this, but basically with everything together it was a decent deal without the rebate, and an incredibly good deal with it.

      Meanwhile they are playing the float with your money. Its not that bad b/c they do pay after you jump through many hoops but they count on people not putting up with the hassle. This is a good bet b/c people value their time and sanity.
      • In this instance I don't feel they even had time to do much with the float of my money, I had the rebate in 2 weeks time. I didn't have to jump through any hoops, all I did was fill out my info on the website and it gave me a page to printout with a checklist of what to include. Frankly I have bills that are more complicated to prepare and mail in.
      • For minimal hassle I saved a lot of money. I even have the keyboard and mouse spare if something fails. They're not great, but they're not total crap either, they're fine for spares. The case turned out to be a real surprise, it's a really nice case, laid out perfectly. It didn't even take a bit of effort to have all my cables neatly tucked away, I'm quite happy with it.

  11. Posted by Zonk on Saturday April 02, @01:46AM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh!? it's not over yet?

    God, I hate you Americans with your April fools... where is all that News for Nerds? or Stuff that matters?!

    1. Re:Posted by Zonk on Saturday April 02, @01:46AM by Arclight17 · · Score: 0

      It seems you don't grasp the concept that even though it's still April 1st where you are, that it's been over for an hour and 46 minutes when Zonk posted it.
      Are you canadian, south american, mexican, or an island in the pacific west of the date line? Because those are the only places that it was still april first. (this is just curiousity on my part)

      --
      All men can fly, but sadly, only in one direction--Down.
  12. Best Buy with morals? by Rightcoast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think not. They have to have thought up something better.

    Only my extreme tenaciousness allowed me to get my rebate for a router. I had a photocopy of the reciept they lost TWICE, claiming I never sent it in. On the third time they tried to pull the old "no facsimilies" routine, but I kept at them and they relented and gave up the 30 bucks.

    A richer man would have just given up. That is part of thier plan.

    1. Re:Best Buy with morals? by hazem · · Score: 1

      The article mentioned that they were considering a club where customers could pay up-front to join, and then earn points on their purchases.

      Sounds kind of dumb, really. I'll pay money to join Costco, because I get good stuff at a discount. I'm not going to pay money to Best Buy to buy crap at a premium.

    2. Re:Best Buy with morals? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think not. They have to have thought up something better.

      It's nothing to do with morals. Capitalism doesn't require morals. Best Buy probably spends more on customer complaints, lost customers, etc. to warrant this decision. They are self-interested, because they want to benefit the consumer.

      (Only to the point where they have to do the least and get the most. They wouldn't give up profits for the consumer's benefit.)

    3. Re:Best Buy with morals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to pay money to Best Buy to buy crap at a premium.

      Aww... C'mon... Please?

      Sincerely,
      Best Buy

    4. Re:Best Buy with morals? by Rightcoast · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that was what I meant to the letter. You took that and expounded it better than I did though.

    5. Re:Best Buy with morals? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      considering? RewardZone already exists and crazy popular amongst people who stop in bestbuy.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:Best Buy with morals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering? RewardZone already exists and crazy popular amongst people who stop in bestbuy.

      Also popular amongst people who shop at Best Buy? Mental retardation.

    7. Re:Best Buy with morals? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 5, Informative

      No morals required. Though they mouth platitudes about serving the customer, if you read further in the article, the FTC announced that they're going to hold retailers responsible when manufacturers don't pay their rebates. That is why Best Buy is making this move now.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Best Buy with morals? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I did read that the FTC required CompUSA to pay rebates on a company that went "bankrupt". I think that is one of the tricks of the rebate trade, the company supplying them goes out of business so the rebates don't have to be paid. Now that the FTC has apparently said that can't happen anymore, I can see fewer of these rebates being promoted.

    9. Re:Best Buy with morals? by plover · · Score: 1
      The club is called Reward Zone. They talked me into joining it a couple of years ago, when I was making something like a $1300 purchase. Because of some screwup at the cash register, the dollars of the sale didn't get put into my account. It took three months and four phone calls to get the dollars in the right place.

      Eventually, we received the promised $75 in Best Buy coupons.

      So for using Reward Zone I ended up with B.B. coupons, which are much less useful to me than cash. As far as I'm concerned, this "program" is every bit as bad as rebates as far as customer annoyance factor, and probably offers less legal recourse for us consumers. The Best Buy employees were amazed that I didn't want to fork over the $10 to renew my "membership" last year. I was more amazed to find that people actually think these things are some kind of "deal."

      Anyway, I'm sticking with General Nanosystems for my computer purchases. I might hit Best Buy for a TV set, but I'll definitely shop around.

      --
      John
  13. Those bastards! by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    Joking about the end to rebates is about as evil as making them in the first place.

    That's just mean!

    Note to self: Call 666 on my phone and ask hell to reserve a spot for this son of a bitch right next to the lot reserved for Best Buy.

  14. If it is real... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness I got mine today!

  15. Geek Squad by moberry · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work for the geek squad at Best Buy #601. Rebates are what we get most of our complaints about, except for service plans. Thats a different story. We would have definately heard about this. We just had our monthly "pep" talk (at 8am sunday morning) and nothing of this was mentioned. If i can confirm this, i will submit a slashdot story.

    1. Re:Geek Squad by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about it. The date may be April 2, but the submitters and editors are as slow and illiterate as ever, so it's probably just a stray April Fool's joke.

    2. Re:Geek Squad by dcstimm · · Score: 4, Funny

      geek squad what a dumb idea. oh wait...

    3. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're at the bottom, you'll be the last to find out.

    4. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

    5. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need a squadron of people to decapitate chickens? Is this purely for the CEOs entertainment?

    6. Re:Geek Squad by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1, Interesting
      No offense to you but I asked a member of your "Geek Squad" a test question: "How do I get started with Perl programming?" The response? Perl is a mixture of C++ and Java so you should buy C# and go to Sun's web site and download the Java SDK. Well, they were right about getting the Java SDK from Sun's web site; but how clueless do you have to be to mistake any programming langage for a "mixture of" two? I was pissed, when you don't know the answer to a question should you just throw buzz words at someone? No! You try to answer their question or admit that your clueless.

      Note: I don't even dabble in Perl, I script PHP or HTML and code in C++ and Java(not proficient enough to sell services or even read discussions of advanced topics).

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    7. Re:Geek Squad by kfg · · Score: 1

      You try to answer their question or admit that your clueless.

      Dude!

      KFG

    8. Re:Geek Squad by nunchux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No offense to you but I asked a member of your "Geek Squad" a test question: "How do I get started with Perl programming?" The response? Perl is a mixture of C++ and Java so you should buy C# and go to Sun's web site and download the Java SDK. Well, they were right about getting the Java SDK from Sun's web site; but how clueless do you have to be to mistake any programming langage for a "mixture of" two? I was pissed, when you don't know the answer to a question should you just throw buzz words at someone? No! You try to answer their question or admit that your clueless.

      No offense to you, but asking a Best Buy employee (most likely a $8-an-hour community college student who likes gadgets) about relatively complex programming languages is akin to asking the guy who recommends wine at the grocery store how to start a vinyard.
      If he was motivated enough to know Perl, don't you think he'd be anywhere but that hellish crap job?

    9. Re:Geek Squad by Mancat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't dabble in Perl, then why is your name "The-Perl-CD-Bookshel?"

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    10. Re:Geek Squad by andreyw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fine. He didn't know Perl. Maybe he didn't even know *of* Perl or wasn't sure. Then why did he authoritatively reply?

    11. Re:Geek Squad by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I know people like this. They are bullshitters. They talk like they know everything and are the absolute authority. NEVER get in an argument with them (you can't win, as they are usually very stubborn). They are, fortunately, a rare bread, but they do exist.

    12. Re:Geek Squad by aztektum · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I hate to break it to you sport, but having worked in retail myself I can say, just because you work behind the counter at *A* store doesn't mean you know what's goin' on with Best Buy as a company.

      If this isn't an April 1st joke, the 2 year time frame is still a bit of a ways off. I would bet dollars to donuts you'd be hard pressed to find ANYONE below the rank of executive or some high level managers, those directly responsible for getting this off the ground, that know more than the average /. reader right now.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    13. Re:Geek Squad by docflan · · Score: 1

      If i can confirm this, i will submit a slashdot story.

      Please do, mister Geek Squad!!!

      PUKE WRETTTTTTTTTTTTTCH.

    14. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perl is a mixture of C++ and Java so you should buy C# and go to Sun's web site

      At the local watering hole a Geek Squadder is overheard saying "Dude, I like told some guy Perl was a mixture of Java and shit. I could of told him that there was ram dust on his johnson rod and he would of believed it."

    15. Re:Geek Squad by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fine. He didn't know Perl. Maybe he didn't even know *of* Perl or wasn't sure. Then why did he authoritatively reply?

      RadioShack Syndrome. Put someone behind the counter of a retail electronics store and he loses all sense of his own limitations.

    16. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm..... Tasty rare bread.

    17. Re:Geek Squad by Dolphineus53 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would a computer repair tech know anything about programming languages? The people at Geek Squad are techs. They replace parts, run virus/spyware scans and reinsall an occasional OS. Which part of this job requires knowledge of Perl? Why would you assume a PC tech would?

    18. Re:Geek Squad by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1
      "Go away or I'll call the geek squad!"
      "I'm on the geek squad."
      "You ARE the geek squad!"

      /The Princess Bride... sorta

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    19. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I work for the geek squad at Best Buy #601.

      You expect us to believe that you work for the "geek squad" and you were able to boot up your computer to post this? Obviously it was still April 1st in your time zone.

    20. Re:Geek Squad by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      Your geek license has been revoked! Charge: working for a non-licensed user of the trade term "Geek"

    21. Re:Geek Squad by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was having some fun at your expense? I imagine people behind that counter get asked all sorts of questions day in and day out, and they probably get tired of it fast.

      From you perspective you may have been asking a question, IT guy to IT guy, and in that sense, it makes sense to ask such a question. However, from his perspective, a customer was asking him yet another question that was vastly outside of the scope of things he was there to help them with.

      Are there any good computer games for cats? How do I make a web? Where do you go to send emails from excel? What's a good way to start learning perl? When your job is to fix Windows and hardware related problems, I can see a man cracking under such a barrage.

      Yes ma'am, excel has a well hidden mail feature. Microsoft likes to keep it under wraps because it helps keep sales of Outlook Express up. You can even send batches of messages all at once. Just enter the recipients in column A and the messages in column B and then hit Ctrl-Shift-S-E-N-D. Of course, this will only work if you've properly configured your mail protocol. NEXT!

    22. Re:Geek Squad by seanmeister · · Score: 1

      where I'm from, we call that "dough".

    23. Re:Geek Squad by NathanM412 · · Score: 1

      As another member of the 'Geek Squad', I really appreciate your post. Most of us at my store aren't quite as bad as that, but we do have one or two people that know everything and are never wrong. Almost all of us are currently in school for IT or CIS. Some are farther along in the process than others. I personally wouldn't know how to go about starting out in PERL except to refer them to google. We spend most of our day removing viruses and spyware. Other customers may insist on upgrading computer memory to help support all of the crap running on their system. The most helpful service we offer at times doesn't actually cost a thing. Every once in a while, we actually convince someone to dump IE and download firefox. I have yet to see a computer with firefox installed have more than 80 processes!

    24. Re:Geek Squad by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      8am Sunday morning "pep" talk? I didn't know Best Buy was competing with the local churches...

    25. Re:Geek Squad by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For everyone dissing you, i'd like to thank you, or at least your organization. Yeah geek squad is kinda silly, but they've helped me out. I was building a system this summer and we had a storm that knocked it out (lightning strike to the pole, hit the cable, passed through the cable modem, but fried the occupied ports on my router and my system). Im not much of a builder so i didn't have enough spare parts around to swap stuff in and out. I was able to take my system there and get it checked out no charge. They were able to narrow it down to a bad motherboard fairly quickly. Also were quite complimentary towards my build skill (wire management, parts choice etc). I suppose something like that would be a welcome change for them from probably spending 90% of their time cleaning spyware off hosed machines, but it was a good customer experience.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    26. Re:Geek Squad by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to you along with moberry. My post to him here.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    27. Re:Geek Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I get sick of doing my job too.

    28. Re:Geek Squad by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      I don't code in Perl, but I have the refrence and could throw down something ugly if necessary. Its more of paying homage to O'Reilly then it is a shout out to the Perl language. Also, I like my relativly low userID :D

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
  16. Wondering by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Informative
    if they're just re-reporting the story I read yesterday over here? If they are, then this is just an April Fools joke.

    So many people either forget or don't bother with rebates that Best Buy would be crazy to abandon them. It's easy money in their pockets... not that I'm defending them or anything. Just looking at it from their point of view.

    1. Re:Wondering by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Rereporting? What do you think slashdot is? This is essentially just one huge blog where people fight tooth and nail to get "karma".

    2. Re:Wondering by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So many people either forget or don't bother with rebates that Best Buy would be crazy to abandon them. It's easy money in their pockets...

      It's only easy money as long as people don't wise up to the scam. BBY and almost all other merchants have been riding the rebate scam hard enough to kill a mule for the last half decade at least. It is amazing that it still fools so many people.

      All it takes is for a large enough minority (probably less than 20% of all their customers) to decide that any product offered with a rebate is automatically disqualified from consideration for purchase and all that extra margin the merchants have been making on the rebate scam goes away.

      The immediate effect will be that any sharp merchant will cease (ab)using the rebate scam in order to try to recapature those customers who've decide they won't play the rebate game any more.

      That may possibly be what's going on here now, but I have my doubts about BBY management being akamai enough to notice and react to a rebate backlash. I expect other merchants to act first before BBY gets it in gear. I just don't have any confidence in a company that is primarily known for building and populating big, square smurf caves.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Wondering by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is time someoen took a real hard look at thier customers that follow thru with the actual rebates and the ones who don't. I would imagine that if more people don't recieve the rebate (for not filling it out, filling it out incorectly,missing a deadline, or whatever the excuse it)It could be a mighty strong case of fraud for advertising the prices "after rebate". At the minimum, i would think it would be considered deceptive business practices (as understand the term to mean in ohio).

      Just like those "you won a million dollars" checks you get in the mail that somehow convince (old) people to spend money at thier catalog store before they find out that it is only if it was your number that was chosen. Then to add insult to injury, they make the number that they already selected and knew about apear to be another chance to win so you still think you need to spend money there to colect your winnings.

      I think i will stick to raffling off bicycles and stuff and letting my cousins win them so i can sell more tickets next month. Want a new car? just raffle one off with the drawing date of when you sell 2/3s of the tickets and print enough tickets to equal more money then the value of the care. After you have the raffle, make sure a distant reletive wins and trade the cash for the car.

    4. Re:Wondering by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I don't fight. I just make smart-ass comments and the karma just rolls in.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Wondering by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
      All it takes is for a large enough minority (probably less than 20% of all their customers) to decide that any product offered with a rebate is automatically disqualified from consideration for purchase and all that extra margin the merchants have been making on the rebate scam goes away.

      Alternatively, let's get a large enough minority to turn in the rebates. Sounds to me like you go in saying "I'll never be bothered to send in this rebate so I'll just pay full price." Who's the sucker?

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    6. Re:Wondering by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, let's get a large enough minority to turn in the rebates.

      That's already happened. Rebate redemption rates went from typically under 20% of the total number of purchases to bouncing off of 40% for some types of products over the last 5-6 years.

      The result? More rebates with more restrictions. Lots of stupid little restrictions like, you have to buy B&M and not mail-order and you have to mail the rebate out within 7 days of the purchase instead of within 7 days of the end of the rebate period (gotta love the ones that say 7 days from purchase and the clock starts ticking on mail order items when they are shipped, not when they arrive). Also the rebate processing centers have become a lot more unreliable - losing the paperwork is now so common that there have been class action lawsuits about it.

      So, the end result of your approach is a war of attrition, how much bullshit is the customer willing to put with in order to get their money back? The more bullshit that people put up with, the higher they raise the threshold next time. The only way to stop that cycle is to opt out completely and achieve rebate nirvana Believe me when I say this, for I am the rebate bodisattva.

      Sounds to me like you go in saying "I'll never be bothered to send in this rebate so I'll just pay full price." Who's the sucker?

      Please. Is that what you would do? Maybe you really are that stupid, meanwhile the rest of us who have figured out the rebate scam understand that ignoring all items with rebates simply means that you price-shop amongst the remaining, unrebated products taking advantage of coupons, sales and other forms of upfront discounting -- not that you, "just pay full price."

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  17. it's all scummy marketeering tactics. by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All that info is used for marketing purposes. Myself, I never get telemarketers calling me. The fact that my phone is used for friends and family only is worth more than the couple bucks saved.

  18. Finally An End To The Illusion of Savings by Horrortaxi · · Score: 1

    Probably yet another April Fool's joke, but it would be a good idea for them to cut the crap with the rebates and just give lower prices in the store. I don't know what the data looks like, but obviously enough people forget to send in the rebates to make it worthwhile for them to offer them. I've done it, and I'm generally pretty diligent about everything.

    Enough already--with the rebates and the fake stories.

    1. Re:Finally An End To The Illusion of Savings by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing, if only 50% of people send in rebates and actually get them back then that means that Best Buy or Circuit City or Compaq, or whoever is only paying $0.50 on the dollar for the rebates.

      So in effect, that PC that's $550 - a $50 Mail in Rebate is netting an average of $525

      Now what if the cost of that Machine is $510?

      Margins are very thin on PCs, and it's not uncommon at all for rebates to bring the cost of an item below it's cost for the retailer.

      Is this the consumer's problem? Conventional wisdom would say no. However, when those machines that were $500 now start at $520, well, that's $20 that some people are going to loose out on for that PC.

      Rebates aren't 100% evil. They have their good side adn their bad side.

  19. If it is another April Fools joke.... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    DAMNIT STOP ALREADY! So freakin' stupid..... I thought we decided that they weren't funny....

  20. Re: rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find anything about the rebates on BestBuy.com. All I see a report on Fiscal 2005 Earnings From Continuing Operations.

  21. To the Readers of Slashdot... by str0gg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Lighten up for Christs sake. Quit complaining. It was all for April Fools. So what if the articles werent extremely clever or entertaining. They were silly and off-base. Thats what April Fools Day is.

    1. Re:To the Readers of Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but no one was fooled, let alone even amused. The way to do it would be slip 1 or 2 plausable, but not quite right stories into a day's worth of normal stories.

    2. Re:To the Readers of Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good grief, the first insightful post I've seen on the whole April Fools debacle. Crapflooding the front page with increasingly banal junk, up to and including a blank paragraph summary FFS, just makes the editors look educationally sub-normal.

      --
      purple_cobra
      away from his main workstation

    3. Re:To the Readers of Slashdot... by m50d · · Score: 1

      No, April Fools are meant to actually fool people. They're meant to be funny and entertaining because of it. They can be obviously stupid if they're funny, but they're not meant to be unfunny nonsense.

      --
      I am trolling
  22. LOL by Infidel666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'd think on April 1st the Sun would report something serious for a change.

    At least I wasn't fooled this time around. Unlike the article about the Meat Tree.

  23. That ought to save them about $10 a year by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    that is about how much they actually pay out in rebates yearly....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  24. Oh god, please kill me... by SubTexel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have yet to find any of the slashdot April fools jokes funny this year, last year, the year before that, etc... Come on and end the jokes!!

    1. Re:Oh god, please kill me... by WindowLicker916 · · Score: 1

      I agree....this year was suprisingly disappointing. Oh well....maybe next year....

  25. good riddence to a [used car dealer] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its not that bad b/c they do pay after you jump through many hoops but they count on people not putting up with the hassle."

    Good thing no one tried this with cars.

  26. Not Sure How This Can Be Good by yrogerg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They make money because only half of rebates are redeemed. This means that they can advertise the price lower than without a rebate by counting on some people not getting their money back. The people that benefit are the ones who do send in their rebate because they're getting a better deal at the expense of the lazy people who can't cut out the UPC code.

    1. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

      Actually what they do is jack the price way up, than offer rebates. So when you turn in your rebate and get your money you end up paying the "real" price (what ever that means).

      Most stores do the same when they have "SALES". They jack up the price than say they're having a sale of 50% off after jacking the price up 50%. It's all just social engineering to rip people off.

    2. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Um... no.

      I can't speak for other retailers, but you do understand that many products that Best Buy carries, such as PCs, have retardedly low margin on them? More often than not, the proce you see on the tag after rebate is below the company's cost. Other areas such ar home theater gear are a diffrent story. There's plenty of margin in most of that except in the lower end stuff. But the point stands, often rebates allow retailers to play a dangerous game, where they advertise a price below their cost, and since they know that say, only 75% of them will be redeamed, they have an idea how low they can go below cost.

      Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But it works enough to keep the companies profitable. Maybe this is a sign that it's becoming less profitable. People are becoming accustomed to rebates.

    3. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by Baricom · · Score: 1

      That's not true. I've done several "Free after rebate" offers like blank CDs. The real price for those items is NOT $0.

    4. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

      That's until you take apart some of those "PCs" than you know why the price is so low.;)

    5. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that is exactly tru. I was recently looking for a digital camera and photo grade printer with more then a tricolor inktank. I saw a couple local adds of stuff on sale and even a few that were the same price as the sale prices "after rebate". Then i checked the internet and found that i could find almost everything advertised on a website somewere (often in the same state)at those same prices without a sale being involved.

      The funiest thing was that i found a camera and orinter combo kit on sale at one store witha saving of $100+. i tried looking the same stuff up seperate to see what kind of deal it was and found that everywere else had the same stuff "on sale" or for the same price and no matter how i mixmatched them, the two added up to within $5 of the sale prices for the combo.

    6. Re:Not Sure How This Can Be Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's until you take apart some of those "PCs" than you know why the price is so low.;)

      Linux is better THAN Windows.
      I drank free beer, THEN passed out.

  27. Personally I don't think they need to do this... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But what they *DO* need to do is advertise the price they are actually selling things for, not the amount they are selling it for less the rebate which may come anywhere from 3 to 6 months later. Yes, the notice "after rebate" is included on the price display, but you have to read finer print on them to note how much money you are actually going to need to part with at the immediate moment.

    If blockbuster can be made to refund people for something just because _they_ had the details in finer print (and it wasn't even that obscured, IMO), I don't see why Best Buy can't be made to stop this effective bullshitting they are doing by advertising the price after rebate as if it were the sticker price.

  28. Gotta have em first by slapout · · Score: 1

    Ya have to have rebates first, before you can eliminate them. (Right now, by the time you actually get the rebate, you forgot that you sent the thing in.)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  29. Postcard? by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    When did they start giving out postcards. Back in the day (when I was dumb enough to shop at Best Buy) I got these mile long receipts that you could wipe your ass with for a month.

  30. how i do it.... by kajoob · · Score: 1

    I tell myself, "self, fill out the rebate info and do all the work BEFORE you open the box of your new little gadget"...and I do. Works every time. Forces me to do the work before I get my reward.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:how i do it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I did that too, until I ended up slicing the power cord of a new printer while cutting the UPC off the box. That sucked, especially since they wouldn't let me return it because I had cut the UPC off (guess their is a problem with people cashing in on rebates and returning goods, never intending to keep them in the first place). Since I did the damage, it wasn't covered under warranty either, so I was SOL.

    2. Re:how i do it.... by alpha · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's smart. In particular after realizing too late that the DVD burner's serial number is required to cash in the rebate. At the bottom of the 3 foot long BestBuy rebate form, it helpfully suggests that you write down the serial number, conveniently displayed on the back of the unit, BEFORE installing it. Thanks BestBuy.

      Is there a way to get the S/N over the ATA bus? /proc/ide/hdc/identify ?

      # cat /proc/ide/hdc/{model,identify}
      PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-109
      85c0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
      0000 0000 0045 4144 4330 3130 3430 3555
      4a20 2020 2020 2020 3453 0080 0000 312e
      3135 2020 2020 5049 4f4e 4545 5220 4456
      442d 5257 2020 4456 522d 3130 3920 2020
      2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0000
      0000 0f00 0000 0200 0200 0006 0000 0000
      0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0007
      0003 0078 0078 00f0 0078 0000 0000 0000
      0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
      003c 0000 0218 4000 4000 0218 0000 4000
      041f 0000 0000 0000 0000 604b 0000 0000
      .
      .
      .
    3. Re:how i do it.... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Buy another printer just like it and put the damaged one in the new box to return. You get your printer in working condition along with the rebate you wanted and they get the damaged printer and a nice box complete with UPC symbol attached.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    4. Re:how i do it.... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      That sucked, especially since they wouldn't let me return it because I had cut the UPC off (guess their is a problem with people cashing in on rebates and returning goods, never intending to keep them in the first place). Since I did the damage, it wasn't covered under warranty either, so I was SOL.

      Were you trying to return it or exchange it? I'd say that if you really wanted the printer, you were trying to exchange it. I just bought an $800 camera and had a small problem. I walked into Best Buy with the camera (no box, no manual, etc.) and a copy of my original receipt. They exchanged it without blinking an eye.

      Now, if you were trying to return it after slicing the cable, well, that's just weird.

  31. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 1

    they knew there would be a high enough percentage of people not bothered to mail in the rebate, so the advertising was far more profitable

    Good riddance, I say. Mail in rebates were just a way for them to mislead in advertisements

  32. They DO need to do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Customers dislike rebates. Really, really, REALLY dislike rebates. Why continue a practice that is a major complaint of your customers?

    1. Re:They DO need to do this by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm a customer.

      I like rebates.

      I really, really, *REALLY* like rebates.

      What I dislike is feeling like I've been lied to, which is how the whole advertise the price after rebate thing makes me feel. Sure they explicitly say that the price is "after rebate", but that's *AFTER* the listed "price"... and it's just plain wrong, IMV. Rebates should simply not be factored into any primary listed price. If they want to, they can list the main price, then list the price after rebate immediately following. It will communicate the same information, in much more honest fashion, IMO.

    2. Re:They DO need to do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Why not simply sell it for the after rebate price?

      Because a) quite a few people don't send them in, b) some percentage of rebates never get sent to the customer, and c) they get use of that money for a month or two.

      It's NEVER a good deal for us. I've bought stuff with rebates, but only if it is an exceptional deal. And I always send it in. But why not just sell it to me for the after-rebate $50, instead of $80 and me letting them hold $30 of mine for a month or so?

    3. Re:They DO need to do this by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Because the rebate is often directly from the manufacturer. And the manufacturer usually doesn't want to deal directly with the retailers for two reasons... one, it can be harder to control whether or not the store is offering the rebate forms to customers -- the store could simply pocket the rebate money themselves and not offer any discount to the customer... or offer the rebate for a shorter amount of time than the manufacturer intended. Two, the manufacturer is hoping to acquire contact information so it can try to sell you stuff later. Sure this is easy to get around by simply checking the box "I do not wish to receive any offers ... blah blah blah", but the manufacturer is still hoping that they can find customers that won't check that box and as a result will simply refuse to do the rebates through the retailer.

    4. Re:They DO need to do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Manufacturer, wholesaler, retailer.....Not my problem. If, at the end of things, the item costs me $50, why am I expected to loan a multimillion dollar company $30, and only 'probably' get it back? Just give it to me for the $50 up front.

      Which is better?
      $50, or $80 and $30 back after a couple of months?

    5. Re:They DO need to do this by mark-t · · Score: 1
      It may not be your problem, but then I don't think anyone was forcing you to buy that particular product in the first place. If "loaning" them money is such a problem, don't support manufacturers that do mail-in rebates. But that has _nothing_ to do with Best Buy.

      Personally, I think of a rebate as free money (well, minus the cost of a stamp), so it's nothing to me. In your example, I'm not loaning anyone $30... I'm paying for a $50 retail product and _getting_ a $50 retail product. If the manufacturer or whoever offers to give me $30 back, I'm certainly not going to object.

      Also, not once has the amount after rebate ever factored into my making a particular purchase decision. Although advertised price is the first thing I see and will make me stop and look for a little longer. But if I see that the price they are advertising is actually after a rebate, and that the price before rebate is unacceptably higher, I'll look elsewhere for what I want. It's that delay that p***es me off, you see... they resort to "cheating" to get my attention with a low price and then spring it on me that it's after the rebate... and I call it cheating because the price is advertised in the same way as any other product's price would be, even if there was no rebate on the latter. It's what cheeses me off about the whole thing, and I would just as soon they not be allowed to do it.

    6. Re:They DO need to do this by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      If they cant use rebates to advertised a 'lower (after rebate) price', then rebates arent of much use to the retailers/mfrs/etc either. The whole point was that they wanted to be able to advertise the lower price, catching the gullible folk, without really lowering the price.

      If they find some other motivation to continue offering them, fine, as long as the price shown in big letters on the signs/ads/etc is the amount of cash you have to part with at the register before they will let you walk out with the item.

    7. Re:They DO need to do this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Personally, I think of a rebate as free money (well, minus the cost of a stamp), so it's nothing to me. In your example, I'm not loaning anyone $30... I'm paying for a $50 retail product and _getting_ a $50 retail product. If the manufacturer or whoever offers to give me $30 back, I'm certainly not going to object.

      Well, I guess we differ. They can certainly afford to sell it for the after rebate price (since that is what they get after sending me the rebate back). So why not just sell it at that price up front, and avoid all this hassle?
      (Because they make a little money around the edges of the deal. Good for them, bad for us.)

    8. Re:They DO need to do this by mark-t · · Score: 1
      The whole point was that they wanted to be able to advertise the lower price, catching the gullible folk, without really lowering the price.
      So it's no coincidence then that this practice makes me feel lied to.

      I have no problem with them advertising that there is a lower price after rebate, only a problem with them situating that on their price tickets with the same prominence that the price on something without any rebate at all would have.

      Therefore, if they are going to advertise the after-rebate price (and as I have no problem with rebates in general, I see no reason why they shouldn't), it should be the *AFTER* the primary sticker price that shows how much you have to pay at the counter.

    9. Re:They DO need to do this by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Not necessarily.

      If the rebate is being done by the manufacturer, then it's not particularly fair to expect the store itself to honor the rebate. Further, as I've said elsewhere in this thread, manufacturers may _want_ only to deal directly with the customer.. and in my opinion there's nothing inherently wrong with this.

      You see, a rebate doesn't mean a product is _worth_ less than what you paid for it, all it really means is that you get some money back for having bought it in the first place. Again though, part of this misconception is brought about by the way they advertise the rebate price as if it were the price you really pay.

  33. kinda? by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    Any person with a brain can see this only benefits the company not the customer.

    I'm here now swearing an oath to all /.ers that when I start my own business that my store will not have rebates or .99 cent bull shit on prices. In fact every thing over $1 will be rounded off to the nearest $1.

  34. I don't know about you... by bl4nk · · Score: 1

    But I like Mail-in Rebates. I've saved so much money over the years from them. Of course, I only really bother with > $20 rebates. I can't say I've ever had any problems with rebates...

  35. I wish fry's would do this by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 5, Interesting

    recently I started shopping at Fry's in Renton WA. I live north of seattle so it is a bit of a drive. Often one of my buddies will go with me which usually results in a bunch of stupid purchases we weren't planning on, but makes for a fun (although expensive) afternoon.

    We wander around the huge store eventually losing track of each other. We are now only slightly embarrassed by having to call each others cell phones to find each other (although this took some getting used to). They have some really good deals especially considering the rebates. I started wondering if something was up a few months ago however when I bought an item, and a few days later when I went to mail the rebate in I noticed some fine print that said I should have mailed it sooner and it was no longer good.

    now I have grown to hate fry's. yes I still shop there, but I am so frustrated when I have to wait 5 minutes while the cashier has to collect the stack of rebate forms for all the items I bought. Often these rebates are not even marked on a sign in the store so I am usually unaware they are even available.

    I did all my christmas shopping there and was horrified at the stack of paperwork it generated. A seperate set of photo copies, forms to fill out, file folders to label and store in a "safe place" and stamped/addressed envelopes to buy, lick and stick. Some of the rebates were impossible to collect as I realized that I had given the UPC codes on some items away with the gift. The giftee's had usually thrown them away (of course) by the time I figured out which reciept went with which gift.

    After cooling off for a couple months I found myself at fry's making a purchase again. Again there was a nice rebate available. This time I was absolutely determined to get my money. As I read the fine print I found another disturbing detail. On this particular rebate (and probably most) sending the required stuff to get the rebate meant that you could no longer make a warranty claim. The warranty of the item required the original UPC, and so did the rebate. So you were given the choice of $x back -OR- the warranty for the product.

    what a world. my fingers are tired of typing. if you skipped the rest of my message I will sum it up for you: rebates suck, frys sucks, best buy sucks, and so do you, and everything else around us.

    goodnight

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    1. Re:I wish fry's would do this by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      On this particular rebate (and probably most) sending the required stuff to get the rebate meant that you could no longer make a warranty claim. The warranty of the item required the original UPC, and so did the rebate. So you were given the choice of $x back -OR- the warranty for the product.

      I vaguely recall this not being legal -- same kind of deal as the one that says your warranty cannot depend on you sending in a registration form....

      Not certain; anyone?

    2. Re:I wish fry's would do this by T3kno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Three words for you boss, computer fair and Internet. I used to shop at Fry's all the time, and grew to hate it just like you. Now if I need anything I'll hit the local computer fair, there is one at the Orange County fairgrounds here in SoCal every other week it seems, and there is a huge one in Pamona every few weeks. Check your local papers, there has to be one in the Seattle area.

      Just a bunch of vendors trying to undercut the other guy, if you know how to wheel and deal a little bit you can beat the crap mainstream stores like Fry's and BestBuy any day of the week, even if you were to get your rebate money.

      As for the Internet if you can hold your horses for even a day you can find killer deals on the internet, a lot of places have free shipping. Plus if you order from the right places you dont have to pay geschtap^H^H^H^H^Hsales tax.

      Phuck Fry's, BestBuy, CompUSA et al. The one last thing I would recommend is your local corner computer shop, those guys are just geeks trying to make a buck, they may not have everything but they'll have most of what you need, plus they can order stuff. Plus he's the guy at the computer fair selling stuff as well, so give him some love, you just might make a friend who can hook you up later on.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    3. Re:I wish fry's would do this by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I hate all computer stores these days (unless I absolutely need something right now). Instead of making the trip down to Fry's, I find it better just to buy the thing on NewEgg. I save energy (in terms of fuel) and don't waste my time. Plus, you can order on a Monday morning from NewEgg, use free shipping, and get it on Thursday. NewEgg is super fast to Seattle. I'd rather just wait a few days, instead of spending time traveling to Renton (and getting dangerously close to a Sam's Club, I believe).

    4. Re:I wish fry's would do this by Electrum · · Score: 1

      Now if I need anything I'll hit the local computer fair

      You can get some good deals, but it's also a great way to get screwed by fly-by-night merchants.

    5. Re:I wish fry's would do this by zeet · · Score: 1

      Manguson-Moss Warranty Act. Totally illegal, has been for 8 years or so. Just went through this with a car part that had a 3 year warranty. Of course, they can require proof of purchase ...

    6. Re:I wish fry's would do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I've been to a 'computer fair', it seems to be an assemblage of tables of fly-by-night 'merchants' selling:

      1) Pulled cards and drives, sometimes shrinkwrapped to look new.
      2) Fake/crappy/knockoff Chinese copies of a Tawainese copy of a Hong Kong copy of CPU fans, speakers, case lights, cases, and sometimes LCD monitors. (which often flicker if you bump the case, try it, it's fun.)

      So if you want that...hey, by all means. Just don't try to call the number on their 'business card' later unless you like hearing the 'number not in service' tone in your ear.

  36. LOL by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    I'd give you mod points if I could.

  37. Legal Betting.... by rmallico · · Score: 1

    The percentage of people who actually send in their rebates is somewhere between 8 and 11%

    --
    sig goes here!
    1. Re:Legal Betting.... by Dolphineus53 · · Score: 1

      The percentage of people who actually send in their rebates is somewhere between 8 and 11%

      Really? Where do you get your numbers from? I have seen several people post these kinds of numbers but no one knows where they come from.

      Oh wait, everyone knows that nobody sends in rebates ... I forgot.

  38. Re:Personally I don't think they need to do this.. by rootofevil · · Score: 1

    the "fine print" isnt really that fine. the pre-rebate cost is printed in the same size font as the post-rebate cost on BBY tags. the rebate amount is usually smaller, but thats really neither here nor there.

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  39. Fry's and Seagate stole my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rebates are great when you actually get them. The scam is even when you send out the forms on time, sometimes the manufacturer chooses not to honor the rebate then you are simply SOL.

    Fry's electronics is the worst. I only seem to get about 75% of the Fry's rebates I send in. Most of the time the rebate just disappears. Sometimes I get a postcard saying the rebate has been rejected for a ridiculous reason. That is what Seagate and Fry's did with my latest rebates, the rejection reason was "unknown." It is like a certain percentage of rebates are randomly rejected. Why do I keep doing it? Cause I'm a sucker for a rebate.

    I am sick and tired of all the scams. Someone should start a class action lawsauit against Fry's.

    1. Re:Fry's and Seagate stole my money! by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Screw that - class-action suits are a scam in and of themselves. Very few of the complainants see any compensation of real value, unlike the lawyers that file the suit.

      Go down to your local courthouse and file a small-claims suit instead. It doesn't cost much and you'll see a lot more money if you win.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  40. What do you think they do with all the information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think they do with all the information that you have to divulge for a rebate?

    I'll bet that your name, address, phone number and email address go straight into some mega-database for choicepoint to disseminate.

  41. It's because the FTC made them pay up by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Federal Trade Commission recently ruled that retailers are liable when rebates aren't paid by the manufacturer. So, now that they can't pass the buck on rebates, retailers want out of them.

    1. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      This is usually because the manufacturer has gone into bankruptcy protection or ceases to exist.

    2. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.usps.com/postalinspectors/fraud/MailFr audComplaint.htm

      If you dont get your rebate back and it doesnt look like you ever will after contacting the company you can always fill out a mail fraud complaint with the US Postal Service.

      One time a friend of mine bought a certain brand of cd burner at a time when the company was having financial trouble and decided to stop filling rebates. My friend filled out a mail fraud complaint and after the Post Office investigated it and found that the company was guilty, they stopped delivering any mail to that compnay. The only way the company could get mail again is if they resolved the issue with my friend because my friend had to sign some paperwork allowing the company to start recieving mail again. After that, the company sent my friend a hand written and signed rebate check for the disputed amount.

      So, while rebates may be a pain, there are multiple ways to ensure that you get your $$$ back from the companies.

    3. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by Darby · · Score: 1

      The only way the company could get mail again is if they resolved the issue with my friend because my friend had to sign some paperwork allowing the company to start recieving mail again. After that, the company sent my friend a hand written and signed rebate check for the disputed amount.

      Did your friend wait 8-12 weeks before signing the form?

    4. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      Republican Morality: Mass murder good. Loving a person Evil. What sick fucks.

      Liberal Morality: Mass murder (abortion) good. Loving a person Evil (except if the definition of love includes two persons of the same sex and a rodent inserted in the rectum). What sick fucks.

    5. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by Darby · · Score: 1

      Wow, my moronic little stalker forgot to hit the "post anonymously" box.

    6. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      Wow, my moronic little stalker forgot to hit the "post anonymously" box.

      Maybe not supersleuth. Maybe this is one of a few identities (yes, it is possible to have more than one) that I have on /. After all if one doesn't hold to the typical /. groupthink one will get the equivalent of a shoutdown and will never be able to post at more than 0. Often it is just easier to post anonymously than to log out, log back in, and then go back to the post in order to reply. But maybe your pomposity and ego demands that you think otherwise.

      As for the 'stalker' bit, don't flatter yourself. I'm just trying to kill some time by pointing out your broadbrush hypocrisy and giving you what you wanted. You *were* trying to provoke a response when you added your little flamebait signature, with its decidedly morally superior tone--now that you have one, you are more than just a little gleeful (yes it shows).

      Perhaps you ought to try to get over yourself--you're not that profound or impressive that I can tell. Anyone can intake a bunch of politically charged claptrap and then regurgitate it on a second-rate news site. When you can come up with an original thought, maybe I will change my opinion.

    7. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by Darby · · Score: 1

      As for the 'stalker' bit, don't flatter yourself.

      I'm not. You are a stalker though. That would be what posting the same brain dead idiotic response to my sig over and over indicates.

      I'm just trying to kill some time by pointing out your broadbrush hypocrisy

      Given the fact that there is no hypocrisy in stating a well established *fact*, that's clearly not what you are trying to do at all.
      What you are doing is taking a true statement and changing the target while adding a bunch of ridiculous nonsense. Gerbils?!? Yeah right.

      You can look here
      for where I explained the sig to another poster. If you can actually come up with anything to refute it, go for it.
      You, of course, won't be able to since you're just a moronic little troll, but there you go.

    8. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      You are a stalker though. That would be what posting the same brain dead idiotic response to my sig over and over indicates.

      Posting the same response to the same brain-dead idiotic sig to illustrate the absurdity of it. After all, it's not like *I* actually believe that what I wrote is true.

      If you can actually come up with anything to refute it, go for it.

      Okay, but you're not going to like it. The fact is that your argument is weak hyperbole; a child could take it apart with very little effort. The arguments that you posit, while decent arguments (in fact, I generally agree with the analysis) do not support your the hypothesis of your sig.

      You give absolutely no evidence that Republicans think that mass murder is good, nor do you give any evidence that Republicans think that 'loving a person' is evil. If so, where is that evidence? All you have done is put forward some facts about why people voted for Bush, and then made a huge leap in logical that would pretend that you know others' motivation and that this motivation is hatred ('purely religious based hatred').

      I think that your whole problem is with religion. Certainly, if people believed in what these people claim to believe, then they would obviously be in opposition to gay marriage. This would not necessarily mean that they hate gays--in fact the dictates of their religion would forbid that--it might just mean that they have an externally imposed ethical structure.

      That does not mean that when a group of people who can not even be consistent in their own stated (VERY LOUDLY) beliefs wants to shove their (bastardized version of) religion down my throat at gunpoint that I should ignore it.

      Since you brought up the issue of the consistency as it pertains to the adherents of religion, I would like to point out that it is infinitely easier to be consistent when one's morality is self-determined than it is when it is externally imposed. When morality is self-determined, all one has to do is change the belief in order to be consistent, which is exactly what happens when personal interests conflict with morals. What people want/don't want to do is quite often the basis for whether they believe an action is moral or not. That is why rich people are more likely to oppose estate taxes, why people with sexual proclivities towards children are more likely to belong to NAMBLA, and people on the dole are more likely to be for more government programs.

      In any event, I think that your sense of outrage, your arguments and protestations are merely a smokescreen for the fact that you have yet to come to grips with some far more important issues and their implications. You are struggling with the same questions man has always struggled with: is there a God and, if so, what is his/her nature? All of the bluff and bluster does not negate the fact that you are quite unsure about what your response should be to these questions and you are suffering unnecessarily because of it.

    9. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by Darby · · Score: 1

      I think that your whole problem is with religion. Certainly, if people believed in what these people claim to believe, then they would obviously be in opposition to gay marriage. This would not necessarily mean that they hate gays--in fact the dictates of their religion would forbid that--it might just mean that they have an externally imposed ethical structure.

      My problem isn't with religion.
      If they believed what they claim to believe, then they would be in no way opposed to gay marriage, they would support it.
      It's the fact that they regularly piss in the face of what they claim to believe that is the actual problem.
      It's actually also the proof that their opposition is purely based in hatred. They blindly hate gays with such a religious fervor, that they completely disregard that it goes against what they claim to believe to act as they do.
      Now, that is some fucked up blind, hatred.

      I mean you, like everybody (else?) on the anti side has yet to come up with a single other rational explanation for the opposition besides ignorant hatred. Even if the religion they claim to follow stood against it, it is still irrelevant to a civil institution.
      They didn't invent marriage, and nobody is trying to tell their church what to do.
      The only thing they hope to prevent is for a person to be allowed hospital visitation rights from their loved ones.
      That is basically it.
      That is a product of a severly diseased mind blind with hatred. What other possible explanation could there be?

      Since you brought up the issue of the consistency as it pertains to the adherents of religion, I would like to point out that it is infinitely easier to be consistent when one's morality is self-determined than it is when it is externally imposed.

      This is arguably true, but wholly irrelevant to anything in the real world. There is no externally imposed morality. Not even in religion, because they just twist it to fit whatever they want.
      Thou shall not kill?!? Why do most of these jackasses support capital punishemnt then?
      Why does the catholic church spend so much time and money protecting baby rapers?
      Seriously, at least act sane.

      In any event, I think that your sense of outrage, your arguments and protestations are merely a smokescreen for the fact that you have yet to come to grips with some far more important issues and their implications. You are struggling with the same questions man has always struggled with: is there a God and, if so, what is his/her nature? All of the bluff and bluster does not negate the fact that you are quite unsure about what your response should be to these questions and you are suffering unnecessarily because of it.

      You're clearly an insane person.

      I expect people to live up to the standards that this country claims to believe in.
      This means keeping your religion out of my laws.
      It means letting other people live their lives.

      How you switched this around to your fucked up deluded religious beliefs is beyond me though.

    10. Re:It's because the FTC made them pay up by sosegumu · · Score: 1

      I think that you proved my point--not yours.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
  42. Rebates are in fact deceptive advertising by flowerp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stores typically advertise prices after rebate, making you think you pay less. But for obtaining the rebate check, you have to go through a long process and give up some privacy on the way.

    Here in Germany there are strong laws protecting consumers. Here we have no rebates that are comparable to those in the US. Sometimes there are coupons attached to the product (like: collect 5 of these, claim a freebie/prize). But never we are told the product costs less than at the register. Heck, even the sales tax (more correctly: VAT) has to be included on the prize advertised for the item.

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
    1. Re:Rebates are in fact deceptive advertising by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Does the VAT have to be listed on products aimed primarily at businesses?

      In the UK, it is normal to list prices aimed at that market as "excluding VAT" (although it is usually clearly listed as such).

      Actually, that reminds me; when I bought my first (Wintel) PC in 1998, the ex-VAT price was the one advertised primarily. Nowadays, this is less common. Says something about the changing market for PCs?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Rebates are in fact deceptive advertising by zazzel · · Score: 1

      no, VAT does not have to be listed for business customers. But dealers aimed at that market must make sure that only business customers enter the store, i.e. you need to register with some kind of ID showing that you're a business customer to get in.

      Metro stores for example require you to get their ID card to get in, another company I know of will only accept customers with a business customer ID at checkout.

    3. Re:Rebates are in fact deceptive advertising by thefirelane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heck, even the sales tax (more correctly: VAT) has to be included on the prize advertised for the item.

      That's because due to the terrible nature of the VAT, you can't really compute its end cost on an item... each step of manufacturing has a slight tax that adds up.

      For the end consumer sales tax, we don't include it because ant-government types (correctly) want the consumer to know how much the government is taxing them on an item, so it must be priced seperatly. In Europe the governments don't want you to know how much they tax, so they use things like VAT and the method you mentioned to hide such things.

      Not saying one is better than the other, just different philosophies. The VAT, however, has allowed European governments to steadily raise taxes without the consumers noticing. (This was recently in the Economist, subscription required)

    4. Re:Rebates are in fact deceptive advertising by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

      Customers absolutely do notice a VAT increase, it's all over the press when it happens.

  43. I was wondering by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    who those "little people" where putting rebate coupons in the mail on my street.

    And I thought the circus was in town.

  44. Best Buy, as covered by Minneapolis Star Tribune by LakeSolon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anyone was wondering why Slashdot would choose to link the Minneapolis daily paper for this story: Best Buy is based in Minnesota.

  45. Wait... within two years? by moriya · · Score: 1

    So they plan to kill off rebates... and the catch is to do it within two years. That sounds like a rebate in itself! We'll believe when we see the checks in the mail. :P

  46. Staples has already done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for Staples. The Staples online EasyRebate system has all but eliminated mail-in rebates. Rebates can be submitted at https://www.stapleseasyrebates.com/
    Customers seem to love this option.

    ~DF

    1. Re:Staples has already done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Staples is by far the best store out there when dealing with rebates. I always shop there when I can to reward them.

    2. Re:Staples has already done this by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 2, Informative

      EasyRebates are an improvement, but they're not even close to being an elimination of rebates. Customers still have to pay more up front, and wait weeks to get their money back. All the Staples system does is make it easier to apply. So, no, Staples hasn't "already done this".

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Staples has already done this by cabra771 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having recently used the Staples Easy Rebate system, it's no different than any other rebate system except I enter my data online instead of through snail mail. And I still took around 7-8 weeks to get my rebates back.

      If Staples would allow for the same online rebate entry system and a 1 week turn around on getting your rebate back, then we're talking progress.

      --

      -my other sig is your mom
    4. Re:Staples has already done this by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

      If Staples would allow for the same online rebate entry system and a 1 week turn around on getting your rebate back, then we're talking progress.

      Anybody say optional payment via paypal? :-)

    5. Re:Staples has already done this by Reene · · Score: 1

      I submitted a rather large Staples rebate via the EasyRebate online system some time ago on behalf of my mother. She has yet to see a check or any acknowledgement that they would be sending one. I no longer shop at Staples, and neither does she.

      Same scam, different veil.

      --
      "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
    6. Re:Staples has already done this by gmkeegan · · Score: 1

      Yes, and for this reason I will look at rebates offered by Staples before looking anywhere else. I can fill in a transaction id and rebate offer number online and get a confirmation almost immediately. The alternative is to fill in a form, cut out a UPC code, make copies, address an envelope, mail it, then hope that it gets received, only finding out 2 - 4 weeks later that "yes", the rebate request has been received and is accurate or "no", there was some problem.

      From my perspective, Staples has eliminated all of the drawbacks of mail-in rebates. And no, I don't work for Stapes or have any other direct or indirect affiliation with them.

      --
      And on the 7th day, God said "It's been a week already? No wait, just a couple more modifications..."

    7. Re:Staples has already done this by JonathanThurn · · Score: 1

      My experience with Stapes's "easy rebates" system has also been poor. For nearly a week after Thanksgiving weekend 2004, when the system was introduced, the system was offline. The place holding page cited a need for Staples to upgrade the rebate system's infrastructure.

      Later, on December 1, I entered three items, which had been on the same receipt. As of now, I have received a check for only one of the items. The other two items are perpetually in the "validation" queue. Since the easy rebate system only had me enter information that was already on the store receipt and rebate forms--I did not need to send anything in--validation should have been able to be completed when I entered the rebates back in December. Of course, this assumes Staples has such a national database of all products sold in their stores.

      Today, I have completed the online rebate customer service form. I will see if this prompts any action.

  47. Let's see. According to the artcile. by Maul · · Score: 1

    1. Retailers are liable for rebates.
    2. More people send in rebates than commonly thought.
    3. People hate them.

    So this being the case, the two biggest reasons for Best Buy to offer the rebates aren't very huge.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  48. They're not always honest. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Bought a hard drive that was $100 off after rebates (160GB a few years back). The manufacturer rebate was for $60, the comp usa rebate was for $40. Thats all well and good except they both required the original UPC. It was advertised as $100 off, not $60 off. It was advertized as $100 or something and i ended up paying $140, thats false advertising, plain and simple.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  49. So much for their corporate sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know an (unethical) IT guy who had a nice suplimental income by buying stuff for his company and sending himself the rebate checks. I think a lot of the rebate driven sales are from scum like that.

    1. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that is unethical. If the company was told the price is X amount of dollars, and aproved X amount of dollars for the purchase, then they spent what they expected to spend. Of course this expense is going to be accounted for in taxes/invetory/etc so the rebate wouldn't even come into the Picture if the rebate was sent to his home and not the company.

      I don't think it is the same thing as getting a reciet for somethign $30 cheaper then the implied price and keeping the change. It is little more then someone paying you to shop at thier store for all your company needs. Mayeb i am wrong on this though. I have bought stuff to fix clients computers and told them the cost out the door and then got the rebates myself without feeling guilty. They agreed to the price and got what they paid for.

    2. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Man, I wish I had thought of that.

    3. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is totally unethical - it is a form of fraud. link.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    4. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Not realy. If i tell you that product X is going to cost Y dollars and give you a recipt for Y dollars, then whats the difference? What if the company doesn't cash the rebate in or the rebate is only good for a week out of a year that the item is on sale for.

      It isn't much more then a retailer paying you to shop for your company's good at thier store.

    5. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by rokzy · · Score: 1

      okay so now you're adding bribery to the list of okay things as well as fraud?

      AFAIK, rebates are non-transferable and for the people who actually bought the item. I've never actually used one though, we don't have that sort of crap where I live.

    6. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Are you serious ? The company purchased the item. The company is entitled to the rebate. As an employee, you have bought the item on behalf of your company, you are not entitled to take a "cut". What if people in the payroll department were taking a cut off your wages ? ie: the company's books say you make 20% more than you really do, but someone is just taking that money because they have the opportunity. Do you see it now ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    7. Re:So much for their corporate sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't much more then a retailer paying you to shop for your company's good at thier store.

      That almost sounds as if you think it could be acceptable to accept money from someone to shop for your employer's goods at their store.

      Just out of interest, hypothetically, if you were running this rebate scam against your employers, would you be declaring the rebates as taxable income? Just curious.

  50. Shit now... by wasteg8 · · Score: 0

    I have to hope they honor my year and half old gift certificate.

    --
    News for Whiners!!
  51. Don't jump for joy yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is not April Fools. Check out Google News

    If you RTFAs, they are going to give you Reward Zone points instead, which means store lock-in. I've been staying away from Best Buy completely, except for their loss leaders, so that's not a better solution as far as I'm concerned. Frankly I'd rather take my chances with the rebate since I've got the whole process down (keep copies of everything and report to BBB if nothing ever comes). Haven't missed one for years with that.

  52. I guess this is something typically USA-ian by tetrode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, could anyone explain this to the rest of the world?

    Thank you in advance,

    Mark

  53. Lower prices? by Doogie+Howser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, if BB eliminates mail-in rebates, will they permanently lower their prices? Will they increase the intelligence-insulting "instant rebates" to compensate? Yeah, right...

    On a related but perhaps OT note, I've always wondered why car companies have to provide many thousands of dollars in rebates and "incentives" to sell their products. Anyone ever think that maybe the price points were too high to begin with? Just a thought...

  54. The fine print... by ktakki · · Score: 1

    A couple of examples:

    In 2003, my rented house got sold from under me, so I decided it would be a good opportunity to travel for a while. Towards that end, I bought a Toshiba laptop and a Sony-Ericsson cell phone (T-Mobile). Both were pretty cheap, even cheaper with the rebates.

    The fine print on the laptop rebate stated that the check could not be mailed to a post office box. Seeing as that would be my address for a few months, I put down a friend's address. Three months later, the rebate still hadn't arrived. Five letters and seven phone calls later, I got my $100 rebate. Toshiba hadn't sent it because the address I'd used to register my warranty had been different from the rebate address and they thought I was a rebate scammer.

    The cell phone rebate was another story: it wasn't until I filled out the paperwork that I found out that the rebate was incompatible with the monthly plan I had applied for. In the long run, I was better off with the cheaper plan than with the cash rebate, but I didn't find this out until I had purchased the phone and activated the account.

    Yes, it was CrapUSA...err, CompUSA in both cases.

    For the record, I've had no problems with Staples and Breast Buy rebates.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  55. No, this is real.... by lilricky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best Buy has been talking about doing this for the past few months now in their conference calls. Besides, look at the date, its April 2nd

    1. Re:No, this is real.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That means "April's Really Big Fools Day", or "Fuck, Would Somebody Find The Spineless Fucking Retard Who Invented This Fucking Holiday And Beat His Fucking Brains In Day"

    2. Re:No, this is real.... by 192.168.0.1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Besides, look at the date, its April 2nd
      Forgetting about people being in different time zones? At the time of the post, it was still April 1st for some people.
    3. Re:No, this is real.... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      So? It was April 2nd for the last five April Fools jokes too... even in the RSS feed!

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:No, this is real.... by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Funny
      OTOH, if the story had added "...and prices will be adjusted downward by the amounts of the former rebates..." THAT would be an April 1st article.

      rj

    5. Re:No, this is real.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The poster meant on the article itself, or did you even bother reading it to notice this?

    6. Re:No, this is real.... by 192.168.0.1 · · Score: 1
      The poster meant on the article itself, or did you even bother reading it to notice this?
      Yes, I read the article which shows "Last update: April 1, 2005 at 9:33 PM" as its timestamp. So who was the one that didn't read the article?
    7. Re:No, this is real.... by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Forgetting about people being in different time zones? At the time of the post, it was still April 1st for some people.

      Here, here! (sic).

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  56. The Rebates by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1

    I was so excited about the headline I posted before reading the article and finding out it was a joke.

    I'm still pissed from disappointment.

    1. Re:The Rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What article did you read? The one posted is definitely not a joke. I call Bullshit - why lie about RTFA. No true slashdotter reads those things anyway. We just read the posts so we can post annoying comments at each other to pass the time. Note: I am not a true Slashdotter...Yet. I'm still in training. That's why I pwned myself and actually read the article you lied about reading.

  57. Best Buy is getting greedy by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    Last year Best Buy also came to the conclusion that their Reward Zone members actually liked getting less "rewards" and cut the reward program back so it now takes twice as many points to get rewards as it did before.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  58. Given my experiences there... by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

    ...it seems to me they stopped honoring rebates a long time ago. I bought a Linksys WRT54G box and a 802.11g PCMCIA adapter back in August. Each had "rebates". I filled in the paper work, cut out the UPC codes, and mailed everything a day or two after my purchase. I still have not received my rebates.

    One other thing worth mentioning -- If you purchase a "rebatable" item in an area that charges a sales tax, you must pay the tax on the full purchase-price of the item. This reduces the effective amount of the rebate. FYI.

  59. Best Buy should change other policies... by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Their rebate policy was flawed, but so are their other "policies". I will no longer shop at Bust Buy because "policy" always trumps the customer.

    Take for instance their refund policy. If you buy a computer, and pay cash, and that computer doesn't work when you get home - you must wait for a check if you want to return it for a full refund. I advised my mother on going there because of the good prices. She paid cash and got a good deal. The PC was fried and they didn't have another to exchange.

    Apparently another policy is that Bust Buy doesn't ship items from store to store or order replacement items if they are out of stock. Her options were: Wait 1 month for them to fix the computer, for free; wait 6 to 8 weeks for a refund; or pay the manufacturer to ship a replacement (and pay to take the broken machine).

    After their sales staff insulted her in the store (only for wanting what was due), she decided to get the refund and buy a machine elsewhere.

    Still, if I pay cash - why should I wait for a check in the mail? Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too. Hell, they discourage the use of checks as it is.

    Someone should also look into the fact that they never honor their rewards program. In one visit we bought $300 in DVD's and was supposed to get a $25 store credit in the mail (after paying another $10 to join the "club"). The credit never came and they don't even have us on file. Worst part is that we bought more, expensive, items there hoping we'd get a reward!

    Scam!

    1. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      what took me over the limit was when i bought a hardrive. They assured me the rebate would only take a couple of weeks so i put the extra money out with hopes that the $30 would be back in time to pay my car insuance.

      It sure was refunded in time. only problem is that they sent it in the form of a $30 gift card and was only good at best buy. I took a copy of the add along with a copy of the reciet and warenty info that they gave me when i bought the hardrive. They said nothign could be done, either sppend the credit on the giftcard or let it expire. I guess if i had enough money, i should have taken them to small claims court or somethign.

    2. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I don't have the patience, I would have punched someone in the mouth.

    3. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no shit you picked a good user name! play the retail game - politely ask form some pen and paper, and when they give it to you, ask to see the manager so you can get his or her boss's name and number + corperate. at which point they'll bend over backwards and give you the cash you should have recieved.

      on the other hand i have zero sympathy for you risking your credit rating over a stupid hard drive - you should never make impulse buys over $50, especially if you have to budget your money as closely as you apparently do.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah right.

      Problem with Best Buy (especially in that situation) is that shit rolls downhill. It always comes from the top, the people who deal with customers the least.

      No matter, they broke the law in not giving what was advertised so his budget practices don't even enter into the logic game you try to play. You can't blame a customer for not getting what they were promised.

      Or can you? That is the movement that companies are making now a days...

    5. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by RubberDogBone · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Still, if I pay cash - why should I wait for a check in the mail? Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too. Hell, they discourage the use of checks as it is.

      Many stores don't do cash refunds because they don't want to keep large amounts of cash on hand just in case somebody needs a refund. Cash is too tempting for robbery or sticky fingers.

      You can pay for large items in cash, sure, but if it's over a certain amount (varies by store policy) most or all of your money goes straight into the store safe rather than the register cash drawer. They probably couldn't refund a large cash purchase even if you hadn't yet left the store.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    6. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by pipingguy · · Score: 5, Funny


      Still, if I pay cash - why should I wait for a check in the mail? Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts...

      What are you, some kind of communist?

    7. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 1

      The credit never came

      I get reward checks all the time. Me thinks you are exaggerating a bit to make for a good story. We all know how it's great fun for the little guy to bash the big corporation. All your examples seem to involve time. You have the expectation of instant service. I'm sure you waste no time in complaining about a boss who makes unreasonable demands of you.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    8. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by mythicflux · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Take for instance their refund policy. If you buy a computer, and pay cash, and that computer doesn't work when you get home - you must wait for a check if you want to return it for a full refund. I advised my mother on going there because of the good prices. She paid cash and got a good deal. The PC was fried and they didn't have another to exchange.

      Of course you do have the option of having them do a functionality test, it's a bit of a hastle given that they charge a while $0.00 and that it takes a whole 5-10 minutes to verify that the machine boots correctly (assuming you have to go through a setup process).

      After their sales staff insulted her in the store (only for wanting what was due), she decided to get the refund and buy a machine elsewhere.

      That truely does suck, but I would have to ask this, what kind of insult was it? Don't get me wrong, I had a computer salesman imply that I had some damaged my video card purchased 2 days prior which had a TV encoder IC chip actually blow out, (I could see the silicon inside sitting at an angle) and he had the audacity to say "well if you don't know what you are doing" to certified computer technician with years of experience. So I understand that people do say insulting things, but also having held a job way back in retail I can tell you that people are rather fscking nuts, I've been called a fscking idiot because I could not move a customer from a terminal that needed to be restarted (and was about 2 minutes away from being usable again) to a terminal already in use by an existing customer in a department which was not my responsiblity. The issue was that the gentleman in question had gotten this view that right after Christmas with the returns line being 2 hours long that he was somehow more important that the people who had waited just as long as he had. And that my refusal to immediatetly bow down to his demands while he was insulting me was completely unbelievable.

      The point is, those clerks may have been majorly stupid and disrespectful, or it maybe that the situation turned a poor choice of words into an insult for your mother which really wasn't meant to be taken that way.

      Still, if I pay cash - why should I wait for a check in the mail? Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too. Hell, they discourage the use of checks as it is.

      Because, as with most major retailers, the company limits access to money to prevent potential theft from employees and other unknown people. Odds are that that money you handed to the cashier was taken from the front register and placed in a safe to ensure that the company wasn't risking loosing 500+ dollars (and not just the cost of your machine). People have a habit of attempting to rip off major retailers all the time, they return false products sans important components or they return just the empty boxes and stupid clerks don't bother to check the box. So as a safety measure, ask yourself this, if you ran a store generating a $10,000 a day and had to just choose some guy you may not know personally to handle that amount of cash, wouldn't you feel concerned about the possiblity that that guy could accidently send a few extra hundred dollars some guy returning something, now, multiply that by they 600+ store Best Buy has. Isn't it a safer bet to have some bean counter hit a few keys, print a check and mail it off?

      Yes, it sounds like you went through a hastle, which did suck, but the store would have had a policy that would have given you options since there is no way in hell a sale associate at any, ANY retail store would let you walk out of the store with an obviously non functioning machine you had just spend 500+ dollars for, your mother could have had a technician test the machine, and while it maybe possible that she wasn't asked if she would like a functionality test, I have yet to purchase a machine from (Best Buy or any other retailer) and not have those sale drones try and sell me on the fact that a functiona

    9. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by xactuary · · Score: 1

      Your mother should have read the sign: This way to the Egress.

      --
      Say hello to my little sig.
    10. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, let's think about this. Best Buy goal is to sell stuff that poeple want, not need, at a cost low enough to make people think they are getting the best deal, but high enough to support executive salaries and maybe generate a profit.

      Obviously, to do this, corners are cut. You are not going to get the same service as a place where they are not having to play games to bring you a low price. They are not going to expend resources to ship extra product across the state and in the process lose money.

      And it is not about buidling relationships. There is none. A person shops at best buy for the lowest price. If the price is lower somewhere else, they will go there. If Best Buy has the lowest price, the person will go to Best Buy regardless of past experience.

      The only thing slimy is the six to eight week wait time. This seems unreasonable, as most places I go refund large sums in 14 days. However, you get what you pay for. If dealing is honorable people is a benefit, pay for it. There is little at Best Buy that is a neccisity.

      If I may add a computer tidbit. I remember about 10 years ago buying an Apple Laptop. There was some minor issue with it, and i wanted to exchange it. It had been at least a week, and the store said I could not return it but had to send it back to the manufacturer myself. This was reasonable, as at that time computer manufacturers were increasingly refusing to exchange computers that had functioned for a week. However, Apple still had the policy of allowing up to 30 days. Of course now almost everyone is 14 days, though apple will still allow 30 days under soem conditions. Fortunately I was able to ruturn the machine, get a new one, and not suffer the productivity loss of having to wiat a month for a repair.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting. I renewed my Reward card. Why? I have only received over $150.00 in Best Buy credit. Which I happily spent at Best Buy. I have always received my MIRs (and I am a techie who hits Pricewatch first and other online retailers). Sometimes BB has the better deals, especially when I can drive home from school and pick up the thing I want.

      If your mother had bought an eMachines computer, eMachines would have sent you the new computer at their cost, and the box they sent it in would have had the paid return shipping label inside so that you could use that box, the new shipping label, and send the PC back. That's how it was for my fried laptop.

    12. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Angus_Dei · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked as a warehouse supervisor at a Best Buy store for 2 years - a significant part of my job was shipping and receiving items between area stores to meet customer requests for out-of-stock or replacement items.

      But it was MY job to make sure that happened. Remember that it may not be Best Buy that is screwing you over - it may be that particular store that has poor management and customer service.

      Though after seeing the markups, I rarely shop at Best Buy for anything but base computer equipment (not accessories) - which is generally sold at 5% above cost.

    13. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      7-10 days would be a reasonable amount of time to wait for a refund by check to arrive in the mail. 6-8 weeks is robbery, especially if the return policy says nothing about the waiting period, and even then it might not be legal.

    14. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by alSeen · · Score: 1

      Odds are extremely good that it was a Best Buy Rebate Gift Card. Very different from the regular Gift Cards. The rebate versions allow you to take the card to BB and get cash for it instead of having to purchase anything.

      Basically it allows you to get the cash without having to cash a check.

      This last Thanksgiving, most of the big dollar items (computers, cameras) had rebate giftcards as part of the rebate. It stated right there in the add that the rebate giftcards can be converted to cash. I also asked about 5 of the managers there if this was true, everyone said yes.

    15. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Advice to all: shop at NewEgg. Great selection, great prices, and I have experienced their reaction to damaged merchandise... they speedily replaced it with no hassle.

    16. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by autophile · · Score: 1
      Their rebate policy was flawed, but so are their other "policies". I will no longer shop at Bust Buy because "policy" always trumps the customer.

      What?!

      Talk about cutting off your nose in order to spite your face. Face it: corporations are there for their own convenience, not yours. Keep refusing to shop at stores because of their "anti-consumer" policies, and you'll be left growing your own food, and watching the grass grow for entertainment.

      I don't like it any more than you do, but at least be practical about it.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    17. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Have you ever worked in an industry that doesn't have huge mark-ups? I worked for a local techie who's markup was 200% or more. Now that I'm on my own, my markup is price*1.15 (15% above or 115% markup). However, grocery stores, local pc shops, auto shops, etc. all have a huge markup on their items. Many major mfg's (Dell, Gateway, Compaq, etc.) from the 90's would sell extra RAM, and hardware at outrageous prices ($150.00 for that 32MB of SDRAM) where you could purchase the same item for $60.00 down the road. (Then those mfg's realised they really wanted to sell those items.)

    18. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a cashier who worked at OfficeMax for a year, in 6 hours it was routine in a day to have to call my manager over because the till exceeded $5000, and this is an office supply store. I think BB, with its customers being on average younger, would process more cash transactions. They make the rebates by mail so it's more inconvenient, so lots of people don't fill them out and they don't have to pay them.

    19. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time it happened to me (it was a $10 rebate) I got a hold of the manager and told him, we can do three things now, I get a hold of YOUR boss, and whether or not he makes you give me the money you get yelled at, I give you five seconds to get ready then beat the crap out of you, and whether or not you successfully sue me you'll have bones aching the rest of your life, or we can both be reasonable and settle this in fifteen seconds.

    20. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by jcostom · · Score: 1
      Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too.

      You can't scrape together $20, $50 or $100 to open a free checking account? Money tight? Save $5 a week and you're there in no time. Surely you could manage to put aside $5 a week, right?

      The days of banks only offering free checking with high minimum balances are quite over.

      Really, how hard is it to spend 15 minutes in a bank branch to open a checking account? Unless you're an illegal alien, of course. Though, for all I know, there are probably ways for them to open a free checking account too.

      --

      The unsig!
    21. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

      If you buy a computer, and pay cash, and that computer doesn't work when you get home - you must wait for a check if you want to return it for a full refund
      Ummm no. I have seen plenty of people return computers after paying cash, they just ask why they are returning it like they do for everything else. If you are saying she had to wait for the check because she already took the UPC off, that is another thing that you conveniently left out. Obviously they are not going to refund her the whole price that she paid when she has another check coming in a couple months. Use your head.

      Apparently another policy is that Bust Buy doesn't ship items from store to store or order replacement items if they are out of stock
      Yes they do.

      Someone should also look into the fact that they never honor their rewards program
      Sounds like a personal problem, I have seen hundreds of people walk in with the reward zone coupons and never heard of anyone complaining about it.

    22. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who in the sam hell spends $300 to get $25. I'm not trying to troll here, but doesn't it behoove you to be aware of their policys and procedures before you hand them a wad of cash equal in value to a computer?

      I mean, seriously... every BestBuy store I've EVER been in has their return/exchange policy on big ass signs, on the reciept, tatooed on the employee of the month.

      Stores have to have rules about these sort of things, or they would hemmorage money from employees just doing "whatever." They probably don't want these same employees handing customers computer sized wads of cash either.

      Can you imagine if it occured in half the stores, in one transaction in a month, an employee made a $100 mistake refunding a customer's money. Roughly 200 stores involved, so there's $2000 in a month. It doesn't seem like alot, but in retail electronics every single penny you get counts.

      Mark up on a computer, and mark up on a stereo are completely dis-similar.

      To sum up, be smarter than the store you shop in.

    23. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too.

      Those people should buy their computers at WalMart, the store for crackheads without checking accounts. WalMart will give cash refunds for products they don't even sell.

      The credit never came and they don't even have us on file. Worst part is that we bought more, expensive, items there hoping we'd get a reward!

      Legit reward or no, that's a dumbass thing to do, kind of like using too, many, commas hoping you'll randomly hit on the proper punctuation.

    24. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Still, if I pay cash - why should I wait for a check in the mail? Cashing a check isn't cheap for people who don't have checking accounts, not everyone does have one too. Hell, they discourage the use of checks as it is.

      I'm guessing they do this because it makes it less tempting for people at the till to issue fraudulent refunds. You "forget" to give a few of your customers their recipts, or you go through the garbage can in front of the store. You then refund the non-existent stuff as broken, and take the cash for yourself.

      Because it was rung up and paid for, none of the cash registers are going to be under. You have the recipt, so the paperwork is in order. And because few stores track damaged merchandise, most not requiring the original box to be returned, the total merchandise on the floor is correct. The only way they have to catch someone they suspect is doing something on the down low is to figure out where those refunds are actually going. A check has to be issued to someone, which makes tracking a lot easier.

      A lot of annoying store policies are in place not to make the life of their customers harder, but to try and stop their underpaid, unappreciated employees from robbing the store blind.

    25. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone risk their insurance payment on $30 that could take many weeks? Seriously.

      Judging by your username, you at least realize your problem, something that many other dumbasses can't claim. That's a step in the right direction.

    26. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1
      You would have lost in court since the rebate would have clearly stated that it was for a $30 Best Buy gift card.

      Caveat Emptor

    27. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1
      > Apparently another policy is that Bust Buy doesn't ship items from store to store or order replacement items if they are out of stock.
      That is simply untrue. Best Buy can ship items from their warehouses to their customers via Customer Fulfillment, and they can transfer stock between stores via a process they refer to as ORCA.

      > people who don't have checking accounts
      With the plethora of free checking accounts with Visa debit cards and no minimum balance requirements, it is hard to feel sympathy for someone that cannot be bothered to get a bank account.

      With regards to insulting your mother, that is uncalled for, and you should have addressed the associate's behavior with the store's GM and BBY Corporate via 1.888.BEST.BUY.

      Best Buy's Reward Zone has done nothing but net me cash savings for items I would have been purchasing at Best Buy anyway. Best Buy is very generous with their Reward Zone program, even going so far as to allow you to call in or use their web site to get credit on transactions that you forgot to use your card on.

      While the purchase of a service plan from Best Buy is seen by many as a scam, it is definitely in the purchaser's benefit on any large ticket item, such as a computer or major appliance. Frankly, consumers expect retail outlets to take ownership of far too many problems that are not the retailer's responsibility. I have no sympathy for the jackass that comes in to a store after fouling up his product (especially outside of the published return period) and expects the store to take action, when the idiot should really be contacting the product manufacturer directly for warranty service.

      Being a smart consumer requires intelligence as well as dilligence.

    28. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Konowl · · Score: 1

      Grocery stores? You're talking about a 20% markup. Not huge.

    29. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by tokabola · · Score: 1
      Of course you do have the option of having them do a functionality test, it's a bit of a hastle given that they charge a while $0.00 and that it takes a whole 5-10 minutes to verify that the machine boots correctly (assuming you have to go through a setup process).

      You obviously haven't bought a new computer in the store lately. It takes at least 10 minutes just to get it unpacked from the box - and believe me you won't be getting it back in that box any faster, if at all. And that's assuming you can find a free "associate" willing to spend 20 minutes to half an hour doing something he gets no "incentive bonus" for. It also assumes that any problem with the PC will be immediately obvious and prevent a proper boot. A quick "boot test" won't detect an improperly seated heat sink - only a "burn in" test of at least a half hour will really test if a PC is usable.

      Because, as with most major retailers, the company limits access to money to prevent potential theft from employees and other unknown people.

      While the cashier won't have access to that cash, the managers will. After all, if the manager can't get the money, how can he/she deposit it into the bank? I have worked in retail, and had a good friend who was a manager at a Best Buy, I know for a fact the manager has the ability to pay out a cash refund, no matter how large. Extremely large (over $1000) may take a little while to assemble (from the safe and by making "drops" from the register) but rarely will the cash simply not be at hand unless you show up at opening time.

      That truely does suck, but I would have to ask this, what kind of insult was it?

      Since when is there an acceptable kind of insult?

      People have a habit of attempting to rip off major retailers all the time, they return false products sans important components or they return just the empty boxes and stupid clerks don't bother to check the box.

      Which is why they are supposed to call a floor associate from the relavant department to check the product being returned. It certainly doesn't justify punishing customers with legitimate returns.

      Most retailers work on a policy that refunds will be made in the form of the original payment. If you pay cash, you get cash. Write a check, they'll send you a check. Use a credit card, they'll credit your account. The real reason someone would choose to refund a cash purchase by writing a check is to hold the money (and make interest on it) for a few days.

      With my years of experience in retail and other customer service positions (including management) I am fully aware that the customer isn't always right, but there is NEVER ANY excuse for treating a customer with a genuine problem with anything less than courtesy and doing everything possible to correct the situation. Blaming innocent customers for defective merchandise is unexcusable, and the action of an incompetent, lazy staff.

      Tommy
      --
      Open Source for Open Minds
    30. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by muhan · · Score: 1

      "After their sales staff insulted her in the store (only for wanting what was due)" I obviously don't know happened in this particular case, but what the above means 90% of the time is that the mother made a hissy fit and probably did things like yell loudly that she would not leave until she had cash in her hands in order to make a scene. It's the rarity for a low level employee to start insulting a customer without provocation. Usually the customer (who has the mentality that they are always right and are above the saleperson) starts cursing or making impossible demands and then the impatient employee retaliates. Best Buy is a large company. As any large company, there are going to be lots of policies and red tape. I can see reasons why they can't give you a cash refund on large purchases including increasing the possibility of abuse and employee theft. You can't expect them to operate like a mom and pop business. Simple solution is to buy with a credit card whenever possible.

    31. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by eric_n_dfw · · Score: 1

      My ex-wife wrote a bunch of hot checks that left me with a screwed up ChexSystem record for a while in the early 90's - I just used a savings account for a couple of years. Anyone can get a savings account and depost checks into it with no fees.

      As far as the policy of sending you a check, it's probably mostly to fight fraud. I used to work at the returns desk at Target in a while back and people were pretty good at trying to scam us. For instance, once thing that someone did was to buy a ton of Polaroid 1-Step film, return it to another Target store without the receipt - then she would buy a bunch from Price Club (Costco/Sam's club kind of place) where they sold it for a couple bucks cheaper. Then she'd return it to our store with the receipt that shows she paid cash. Not a huge amount of money, about $30 "profit" to her each time though. Luckily, security caught on and when we told her that we'd be mailing her a check, she said "never mind" and took the film with her.

    32. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      Many stores don't do cash refunds because they don't want to keep large amounts of cash on hand just in case somebody needs a refund. Cash is too tempting for robbery or sticky fingers.
      • Yes this is true, but... Best Buy deals in expensive items. They even sell appliances. This isn't the type of store that can afford to have small cash reserves on hand. Why not? If they did that they run the risk of not having enough cash for change if too many customers pay in cash. They simply MUST keep a fairly large amount of cash on hand, more than likely locked up in the cash office (or equivalent) or they might have to close down early some evening.
      You can pay for large items in cash, sure, but if it's over a certain amount (varies by store policy) most or all of your money goes straight into the store safe rather than the register cash drawer. They probably couldn't refund a large cash purchase even if you hadn't yet left the store.
      • Again this is Best Buy, not a convenience store. There will be someone there who can open the safe, there pretty much has to be.
      • I never worked at a Best Buy, but from working at a Wal-mart a few years back, a place that doesn't sell nearly as many high ticket items, it was not uncommon for cashiers up front to have to get loans because they ran out of cash giving change. The service desk also has that problem, they have to get loans much more often because of cash refunds. (And cashing money orders, and nowadays cashing payroll checks.)

        Wal-mart's policies are different on returns but Best Buy simply cannot claim they don't have the cash available to do refunds. Whatever the reason for this is, it's not that. I'm also very suspicious of any claims of loss prevention in cases like the grandparent mentioned -- with receipt, bought very recently.

        It's best to point out that the refund will take over a month, up to two, and that Best Buy will be earning interest on that money the whole time. That's probably the real reason -- greed.

    33. Re:Best Buy should change other policies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure this is exactly why they do it that way. While you didn't get into it in too much detail, another reason is that it makes you traceable. If a scammer pays in cash, thinking they cant be traced, they can't just get cash back. They have to wait for the check (and it's possible the returned component will be tested before sending that check). And chances are you're going to be tracked in some way whereever you cash that check. Whether its at your bank account, or at the liquor store, they are probably going to require various information (like driver's license number) to allow you to cash the check. So then when Best Buy finds out you tried to scam them, they can follow the paper trail back to your house.

      Earlier this year a friend of mine got a great deal on a video card, and got it home to find the box was stuffed with paper. Someone had bought the product, taken the card out, stuffed the box, (possibly re-shrink-wrapped it?), and returned it. Under your cash scenario, that person gets a free 300$ cash.

      Of course it makes sense to say Best Buy should have checked the box when it was returned, but customers dont like waiting, and how many of the employees know whats supposed to be in that box, and how to correctly test that it works? Or what if the 5$/hour cashier doesnt feel like checking the box, or checking it well? Best Buy doesn't want to be in the position where they're relying on a lazy high school student to check a $500+ product for validity. Better to return it to the manufacturer, and if the manufacturer says its bad, then trace the refund check.

  60. That's a by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 4, Funny

    hell of a long time to be in a conference call. They're phone bills most be through the roof and in need of a major piss break.

    1. Re:That's a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calls - thus the plural.

    2. Re:That's a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're going to correct spelling, at least get it right. It's "their", not "there" or "they're"

    3. Re:That's a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Was it a spelling error or a grammatical error? Inquiring minds want to know.

    4. Re:That's a by jellybear · · Score: 2, Funny

      I concur, and also it is spelt "symantec".

    5. Re:That's a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you are joking...

    6. Re:That's a by zombie-m · · Score: 1

      Their phone bills must be in need of a major piss break?

  61. The rest of the story by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, Best Buy has gone a large way to eliminate rebates already. I used to get a lot of good rebate deals at Best Buy, now I hardly get any. In elimination of the rebates they don't seem to have done much to reduce prices, they have just eliminated many of the deals. I for one miss getting free optical mice or free 50 or 100 packs of CDRs after rebate, even if I did have to send in the rebate materials and wait months. The remaining rebates seem to be on higher priced items, but before you get too thrilled that they are eliminating rebates, what in the world makes you think that they will lower prices to reflect these lost rebates? They sure didn't do it on the cheaper items that frequently had rebate deals on them, I doubt that they will do it often on any item after they completely get rid of rebates. No one forced you to send in those rebates, but it was a way to get money back if you did. If the rebates vanish completely but the prices still don't reflect it, then we all lose.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:The rest of the story by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      In two words - competition, and marketing. They *want* to advertise lower prices, to attract more customers. Basically this just means that (hopefully) they are voluntarily doing what I thought they should be forced to do - whatever price they advertise in large print *has* to be the amount they demand from you at the register, no more of this loaning them money and then waiting around for them to repay it to you. (without interest, and with the additional expense of time and usually postage on your part)

    2. Re:The rest of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will they do? They will, of course, claim that everyone WANTS to pay the higher price, until finally a few more people wise up and take their business elsewhere.

      At that point, one of two things will happen:

      1) they will realize they are driving their customers into the arms of their lower-priced competitors, and drop their prices to more reasonable levels.

      2) Far more likely, they will DECIDE their competitors are somehow unfairly stealing their customers, thenlobby Congress to pass a law against their competitors, either to eliminate them or to drive their prices up, or they may just sue them directly to jack p their costs.

      In either case, you won't see their lowsy customer service improve, which just might encourage more people to stick with them despite the higher prices.

      BB is not willing to consider the possibility of having better customer service meaning better customer loyalty. Instead they bilk you for as much as they can get away with, and then leave you on the street corner... Not unlike casinoes.

  62. Best Buy to stop paying rebates? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Funny

    How is this any different than what they currently do?

  63. Rebates explained by spineboy · · Score: 3, Informative
    A rebate is when a company offers to send you some money after you typically send them a copy of your receipt and the UPC (bar) code off of the box. Rebates often are for a large amount of money - say $30 off a $130 item. They are typically offered by the manufacturer.

    The catch is that they often "lose" the paperwork, or require many "hoops" for you to do, so that you may get your money. They rely on the fact that many people do not fully complete all the steps necessary to acquire the refund, and thus the company never pays out. I've seen figures that state only about 10% of people wind up getting their money from these things, for a variety of reasons - forget to send the paperwork, lose the receipt, forget the deadline, etc.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Rebates explained by 192.168.0.1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      forget to send the paperwork, lose the receipt, forget the deadline, etc.


      and claim to never receive it when delivery confirmation and a signature of one of their employees says otherwise.
    2. Re:Rebates explained by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah... so that is part of the ploy?
      It is not so common here. Recently I bought a cable box and I would get half of my money back. I sent in the forms, and indeed: they were lost.
      I did not know that would be standard procedure...

      It must be inconvenient for the company as well. They have to keep records of which forms are received for the first time so they will be discarded, then advise those complaining customers that they need to send them a second time, this time handle them correctly, and make sure they do not get the rebate again by sending one or two extra forms...

      And even then, the first-time failure of the handling of course stamps a negative image on the company.
      They must have had a difficult time deciding if this is all worth it...

    3. Re:Rebates explained by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      A key part of the rebate thing is the large "after rebate" price advertised on the labels in the store and on the advertisement circulars.

      So when combined with the probability of actually getting a rebate check, it comes out to false advertising.

    4. Re:Rebates explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like there is this organized system to systematically cheat all customers. Stuff like that is easy to catch and would get them in trouble with the FTC.

      Instead, rebate centers are considered a cost center. They are under-staffed, paid poorly, given obsolete equipment, and generally kept as absolutely cheap as possible to run. If this results in a high inefficiency that means many rebates are lost in processing, then so be it. Since losing rebates benefits the company, they are not going to pay good money to try to fix the problem.

      To solve this is simple. Companies should be liable for a fine of $100 or three times the amount of the rebate, whichever is more, for any rebate that is not processed according to the rules (mailed within 6 weeks, customer notified if form invalid, etc.).

    5. Re:Rebates explained by torok · · Score: 1

      No, it's not inconvenient for the company at all. They hire an external company to handle their rebates. I have yet to see a rebate being handled by the company that built the product.

    6. Re:Rebates explained by gcauthon · · Score: 0

      When you call in and go through the whole lost in the mail procedure, they give you a new address and a claim number to attach. This is how they track how many times you've mailed in the forms.

    7. Re:Rebates explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That UPC code is another pet peeve -- especially for any item whose packaging you want to keep.

      A couple of years ago, I bought an (Mac, Microsoft Office v.X) bundle for myself. There was a bundle discount on Microsoft v.X. To get this discount, I had to (a) order both products on the same invoice, then (b) mutilate the Mac box (i.e., the shipping box for any future moves, repair trips, etc.) so I could give Apple the UPC code, to prove that I had purchased the Mac.

      Yet if their only concern was verification, they had enough information to calculate and give the discount at purchase time, without mutilating (or forcing buyers to mutilate) anything.

  64. Missed opportunity by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad, you being the first post on this thread, you could have posted "last post" and it would have been on-topic and funny...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  65. How to get your rebate... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article is probably a joke, but nevermind.

    My brother bought a stack of recordable CDs from a retailer in Vancouver close to five years ago. Of course, the advertised price at the time was a phenomenal deal and against my protestations and the angst inducing mail in rebate requirement for the "sale" price he bit and purchased the CDs, filled out the form and mailed in all the required bullshit.

    Needless to say months later still no check. Down to the store he goes only to find out from the retailer that this is common problem and that most companies contract out their rebates to "fulfilment centres" where "fulfilment" is anything but.

    We get into the "I told you so" conversation and I jokingly mention that he should sue. Note that by this point he'd called, mailed a letter or two and been generally frustrated. He looked into the matter and decided that he would file a small claims suit. According to him, they are incredibly easy to file in BC with only a few sticking points such as the legal name of the entity you wish to make a claim against and the type of business presence the company maintains in BC.

    A few days after (and $100 later for filing costs) he sent a copy of the statement of claim to the company offices in Vancouver he received a nice phone call from the company offering to send him a check for the rebate and the cost of his filing fee (which was claimed in his statement of claim). He never got to stand before a judge, but he did get his satisfaction.

    Now, why would someone go through all this for the $10 rebate on a stack of $25 CD-Rs? Well, he's the guy that decided half way through university that instead of engineering he wanted to become a dentist, so he did. He's one of those anal retentive types that keeps, files and remembers everything. Which is a good thing if you're a dentist, I suppose.

    1. Re:How to get your rebate... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      He may not have gotten to present the case before a judge, but at least he got the satisfaction of getting his rebate check, and I'd be smiling all day from knowing it cost the company 11x what it would have had they simply honored it to begin with.

      Never underestimate the value of a small-claims action. I've had to pursue that before in regards to an issue with the security deposit at the apartment I recently moved out of, and it's my experience that if you're in the right, they'll generally come around pretty quickly when they see you're serious about letting a judge decide what to do.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:How to get your rebate... by mrsev · · Score: 1

      good for him , if lots fo us did that then it would two effects. 1- we would all get our rebates without bullshit. 2- they woud drop all this rebate crap in the first place. You do not fuck with a judge.... Oh but your honour we never got it!...Yes you did!

    3. Re:How to get your rebate... by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, why would someone go through all this for the $10 rebate on a stack of $25 CD-Rs?

      Maybe he's the type of guy that doesn't like companies that *rely* on the "hassle factor" to screw people out of small sums of money (which --> big profit).

      Maybe it's principle. Maybe he just doesn't like losing. But if more than a miniscule proportion of people did that, it would soon not be worth the retailer's time to pull the scam.

      So, it makes sense from a larger scale point of view. Whatever his conscious motivation, this *is* ultimately logical.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:How to get your rebate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know the article, but I did see it on the news yesterday, that Best Buy, a local MN company, pulled the plug on rebates, because customers didn't like it.

  66. Rebates arent popular here by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    and thank god for it.

    It seems the American customer is finally getting sick of filling in those forms.

    In Australia we have seen the change of business models in recent times.

    There is a lot of companies now just offering the best price, when you pay cash. (Or EFTPOS), no cheques or credit cards here, they incur fees.

    If you pay cash you'll always get a better deal, well in Australia anyway.

    I have bought all my white goods, air conditioner, digital tv etc for cash and definately saved noticible coin.

    Checkout http://www.goodguys.com.au/ as an example of a very successful business that has inherited pay less on cash model.

    1. Re:Rebates arent popular here by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, it's actually illegal in some locations to offer diffrent prices on diffrent methods of payment. Basicly, if you post $500 as the price of something, it has to be $500, cash credit, debit, whatever. As long as it's a method of payment you accept.

      Can anyone confirm or debunk this? I know it's not a U.S. federal law at least, as I know some state's gas stations charge more for credit.

    2. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you are thinking of the policy that credit card conglomates have, of closing a merchant's account if they charge more for credit. (In some areas of commerence, they don't have enough pull do to this, as you observe.) This forces the extra cost of the fees on the credit card transaction, which are from 2 to 6 percent, to be born even by those who don't use credit cards.

      As far as federal law goes, I think it bans you from charging more if the person pays in pennies instead of bills, but it doesn't address credit cards, those not being "legal tender for all debts, public and private."

    3. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It is in the UK... some shops advertise the credit card surgcharge then say 'the price you pay is the same'

      IIRC there was some legal case over it and the courts said they had to sell at the advertised price. There are exceptions to this - for example if the sale is 'trade' related (similarly such stores are able to advertise ex-VAT prices, which is illegal for 'consumer' stores... for some reason computer equipment is advertised in this way).

    4. Re:Rebates arent popular here by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Credit card merchant agreements usually prohibit charging a higher price for credit cards.

    5. Re:Rebates arent popular here by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      It seems the American customer is finally getting sick of filling in those forms.

      I remember when and older woman went to the local Office Depot to buy one of their PCs on special. The price paid out of pocket was pretty clear but the thing had rebates up to high heaven. Compaq by HP rebate, HP by HP rebate, KDS rebate, Office Depot rebate, not just a single office depot rebate but one for the whole package, and one each for monitor, system, and printer. So about 7 seperate forms and things to fill out. She couldn't make heads or tails of the rebates... so she went back to the store and sure enough after 2hours they filled everything out for her. I would like to think if more people did this perhaps the stores would be less inclined to offer rabates.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess australians just don't know how to manage money or something. I pay my cc bills in full every month and find them much more convenient than carrying cash with me. If someone robs $2000 in cash while on my way to pick up my new stereo, I'm screwed. If they take my credit card, I pay $50 at most, not that I'm afraid of that, but CC's offer me a lot of insurance over carrying cash. Viva la cashless society

    7. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but in Australia, unlike America, we don't carry silly Firearms to commit theft.

    8. Re:Rebates arent popular here by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      The separate charge for credit card payments (but which the customer doesn't pay) is a VAT avoidance scheme which accountants have devised for retailers. The idea is that the credit card fee (2% or so of the total) is VAT exempt and so the retailer gains a small but not insignificant boost to their profits (i.e. through not having to account for VAT on the 2%). It doesn't affect the customer at all (although some people have a moral problem with becoming unwittingly part of a tax avoidance scam).

      Customs challenged Debenhams' version of the scheme (which was particularly poorly implemented) and won, however Debenhams won on appeal. Customs are now taking the appeal to the Court of Appeal, and legislation is likely if they lose again.

      This is quite different to whether an advertised price must be inclusive or exclusive of VAT. You are right that the general rule that prices must be inclusive of VAT is reversed for business-to-business sales. This is of course because most businesses reclaim the VAT so it's not a real cost for them.

    9. Re:Rebates arent popular here by danielrose · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thats because aussies are generally all theifs anyway, and businesses have become accustomed to theft by employees.

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    10. Re:Rebates arent popular here by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yes, charging extra of paying with credit is prohibited. However, offering a 'cash discount' is not.

      AFAIK most gas stations have stopped bothering with discriminatory pricing against credit cards anyway.

    11. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... aussies are generally all theifs anyway ...

      The plural of thief (no, not spelled theif) is thieves, you racist moron.

    12. Re:Rebates arent popular here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's probably a nationalist troll, not a racist moron, though I agree with your sentiment.

  67. Good point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You didn't mention this explicitly, but retailers generate a lot of their profits during the Christmas season, and when you buy a gift for someone you're certainly not going to cut up the box to collect the UPC to send in for the rebate. So they get to keep that money too.

    What a scam!

  68. "most hated marketing ploys of all?" by joeflies · · Score: 1

    Honestly, can you really call "follow the directions" a marketing ploy? While there are some problematic rebate programs, in general I haven't seen something outright deceptive. The majority of problems I've seen are from people who didn't bother to read the directions on how to submit the form, and subsequently were denied. That, to me, falls far short of being a ploy.

    1. Re:"most hated marketing ploys of all?" by meheler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know, I would consider advertising the after-rebate price in 150pt font, and the note advising you that's only after a mail-in rebate 1/75th that size. You say, "Wow! A hard-drive for $29.99! Deal!" Take it to the counter and suddenly it's $75. "Oh, sorry, didn't you see? That price is only after a mail-in rebate. Would you like to purchase the product anyway?"

      Not everyone has the time, interest, or desire to RTFM. Nor should anyone be expected to when dealing with how and when to spend their precious dollar bills. Really, those kind of rebates should be between the manufacturer and the seller. I think the mark-up should include that kind of convenience.

      In the end I guess I agree that it's not my most hated marketing ploy, since, to me, all marketing tactics are equally worthy of my animosity.

  69. How about not adding tax afterwards? by forgoil · · Score: 1

    It's something that always bothered my quite a lot in the states. The price next to do the product is not what you pay. Taxes should be included in the price. Doesn't matter how that you know they will add it, it still makes it look cheaper than it is (why else would anything cost $9.99 instead of $10?).

    1. Re:How about not adding tax afterwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't see through that, kill yourself. Don't clog up my genepool.

    2. Re:How about not adding tax afterwards? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      I beleive most state laws concerning sales tax require that the price shown be that *prior* to the tax being added, and I beleive there is a specific exception for measured products like gas pumps (since people often have exactly, (eg) $10 on them and run the pump until it gets to $10 - if tax was added after, they'd be stuck.

      Also, the 9.99 instead of 10.00 has nothing to do with tax - and yes it is entirely a way to make it look like it costs less than it does, for those buyers who are incapable of rounding in there head. Just get used to thinking "$10" anytime you see "9.99"

    3. Re:How about not adding tax afterwards? by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

      Yes, in civilised countries it's illegal to display a price which is less than what you actually have to pay.

    4. Re:How about not adding tax afterwards? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that sales tax rates can vary not only from state to state but also from county to county. Best Buy would have to print a separate circular for each tax rate instead of their current regional circular.

      But then even if they did this, they also run into a problem determining whih customer should get which circular. It's entirely possible that you live between two Best Buys with two different sales tax rates. Which circular should they send you? What if they put the circular in an Atlanta, GA paper that you subscribe to but you live closer to the Best Buy in Monroe, GA? That's a different tax rate last I checked (6% vs. 7%). Is Best Buy then liable for paying any difference in advertised price? I do understand your point but it is really not feasible with the current US sales tax system.

  70. Rebate? Try PSP by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As someone who always assumes the price you pay is the price WITHOUT the rebate, what I'd really wish BB would get rid of is their ridiculously aggressive pushing of their PSPs (Performance Service Plans, not Playstations). I've heard real horror stories about what employees who sell low numbers of PSPs get threatened.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Rebate? Try PSP by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just wish they would not lie to you. I was told by a manager that they cannot accept opened software back because it is illegal to do so due to copyright laws..... talk about lame.

      I buy a disney game for my son and it was scratched... it would not even play in the computer at best buy. it was the only one that was on the shelf and I was told this lie when I asked for a refund.... I asked how then do I get compensation for my defective product and the manager tells me to call disney... when I asked for the disney customer service number for me to call she said they did not have one..... in fact, there was no customer service number to call..... I was pissed at the time of this conversation, and I told her I would never shop at a best buy again... and I have not.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Rebate? Try PSP by beavis88 · · Score: 1

      I find laughing directly in the face of the salesperson who mentions the PSP usually ends the discussion pretty quickly.

    3. Re:Rebate? Try PSP by evilviper · · Score: 1
      what I'd really wish BB would get rid of is their ridiculously aggressive pushing of their PSPs (Performance Service Plans

      If you're buying something more than $100, I would highly recomend the PSP. They've saved me tremendous ammounts of money, though I'm sure I'm far from typical.

      I bought a cheap 19" monitor for $150 from Best Buy about 2 years ago (funny how CRT monitor prices have gone up about 1/3) and paid the extra money to get the 3-year PSP. Well, no surprise, practically everything Best Buy sells is cheap junk, and I've had to have the thing fixed twice over that time. Now, this works out well for everybody, because it probably only costs Best Buy $20 each time, and you can't get it fixed elsewhere, as the brands Best Buy sells are notorious for refusing to sell service documentation to service shops.

      I'm actually buying from Circuit City more now, because they (at least in the local stores) have less crappy electronics, and their service plan is even longer, and not any more expensive. But I digress...

      Before this, I had a much worse experience (with SONY products no less). I bought an expensive Sony CD player, which turned to crap after 6 months of use. Exchanged it for the new model they had in-stock, which also turned to crap in 6 months time. Exchanged it for the new model, which also turned to crap in 6 months. Goodbye Sony, hello Panasonic... which also crapped-out after a year. With the warranty almost expired, I took in the unit expecting one last hassle-free exchange, only to find that they wanted to test the damn thing for a couple hours to reproduce the intermittent problems before they'd let me get a replacement. I was sure to make a nusiance of myself over that time, and I got a replacement (a few months before the PSP ended). Goodbye Best Buy, hello Circuit City...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  71. Pissing on the wall... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Point is, they're not all just horrible ripoffs designed to fuck you in the ass. Get overyourself and take off the tinfoil hat.

    Okay, you got me. I'm blinded by my rage towards Best Buy. However, they are designed to fuck me in the ass - that is where "fucking in the ass" involves taking my money.

    It's a business, do you think they ever have my best interest at heart? I'm talking corporate policies that are made behind closed doors that revolve around numbers, not people. It's not that insane to think that they try to think of ways to make money. Is it?

    And getting over myself... I'm not taking it personal. It isn't just me they are trying to "fuck in the ass", it's you too. You know, sometimes it's a real deal... but caveat emptor. If it sounds to good to be true, it likely is. All that jazz. Besides, I don't shop there.

    I bet right now however that the Seagate ST3120026A (yeah, this one for less than $70) will come down to that low $49 price pretty soon, two weeks tops. Do you think Best Buy makes it a practice to sell items at a loss?

    Maybe they stopped rebates because they realized they were paying people to shop there... get real.

    1. Re:Pissing on the wall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a business, do you think they ever have my best interest at heart?

      Are you so self-centered that you believe anyone not near to you should have your interest at heart? You aren't important. Try to rememeber that.

    2. Re:Pissing on the wall... by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you think Best Buy makes it a practice to sell items at a loss?

      Yes

    3. Re:Pissing on the wall... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      LOL, thats some good work there! I wish that I could mod you up.

    4. Re:Pissing on the wall... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I bet right now however that the Seagate ST3120026A (yeah, this one for less than $70) will come down to that low $49 price pretty soon, two weeks tops. Do you think Best Buy makes it a practice to sell items at a loss?


      Um, look again. The two drives on that link that are under $70 are not only diffrent model numbers, but they're 80 GB drives with a 2MB cache.

      The drive in question is a 120 GB with an 8 MB cache.

      As for selling at a loss, they do and they don't.

      In some cases, you have no choice. Let's say that I have a laptop that's 3 months old. My cost to bring it into the store was $1000 (3 months ago, when the company purchased 10,000 of them). It's a P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB, 80 GB HDD, 15.4 WXGA, DVD Burner. The Retail Price of it is $1,100. Sometimes it will go On Sale for $1000 after $100 Mail In Rebates. That's selling at cost, but you know it'll make money, because less than 100% of the rebates will be redeamed.

      Now, let's say the manufacturer of the laptop comes out with a new model. Identicle specs, except it's a 3.0GHz Proc. Oh, and our cost is $900 for this one, because, well, it's just gotten cheaper to make in those three months. MSRP on this Laptop is $1000. That's my cost on the old model. What do I do, sell two identicle laptops, one with a faster processor thn the other for the same price? Do I jack the price on the new one so nobody will buy it, and drive people to the compitition? Or do I drop the price of the old one, enough that it'll blow out my remaining inventory, fast to minimize my losses? After all, if it sits for annother 3 months, then even newer stuff will come out, and then I'll be eating $200 or $300 per unit, rather than just $100 per unit.

      So the choice is farily obvious. Make back what you can on it, and accept the loss as a business expense. We overordered. It happens. You can never estimate with 100% accuracy. But, wait, we can minimize the loss a bit. Let's advertise it as $900 after $200 in Mail In Rebates. Now we do some math using the historical statistics and we figure that we'll pay out $0.60 on the dollar, so we wind up moving the laptops at $980 each.

      It's just one scenario in a hundred. What do you think happens to in store demos? How many of those do you think are sold above cost? Retailers are basicly making back what they can on most of them, save the very high end ones.

      Of course there are other strategies for loss leaders. Upsell the other stuff in the store that you know the customer is going to need anyway. A notebook case, antivirus software, a wireless router, wireless mouse, extended service, whatever. Suddenly the $20 we're loosing on the laptop itself is made up for by the $200 in margin you attached to it. Maybe 2 out of 3 will have an attach rate like that, bringing it profitable again.

      Do they have your best interests in mind? Not really, but to an extent, yes. They want you to be happy shopping there, until that happyness cuts into their profits. Once that happens, they could and should care less if you're happy.

      Now as far as the drive being down to $50 in two weeks, so what? Best Buy had this drive for $50 a week ago. You could have picked it up Sunday. and gotten 2 weeks extra use out of it. Yeah, you've got $50 tied up too, but if price falls that fast, every chain under the sun has price protection too.

      The retail market is too saturated and sinister to tolerate anything as sinister as I think you're implying. If any one company was really some evil empire out to steal your soul, then they'd rapidly loose all their customers and go out of business.

      As far as too good to be true, it's really not. Something like 25% of Mail In Rebates are never even filled out, let alone sent in. That's a $0.75 on the dollar payout before you even factor in the ones that will be denied. So right there, that's $62.50 the drive is selling for on average.

      Don't get me wrong, I hate mail-in rebates myself, and tend to avoid products that have them when it's practical. But I certainly understand the attraction and the logic behind them too. They're not completly nonsensical.

  72. Joke? by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope it was.

    Think of the logic behind this:

    I'm Joe Sixpack.
    I save up my money to buy a television.
    I get there and get the last one in stock because I had to save up my dollar bills.
    I get it home, it doesn't work.
    I take it back to the store to get a refund.
    They tell me that even though I gave them cash, the most liquid form of payment, that I will get a check in the mail.
    8 weeks, or 2 months, later I get a check.
    The check isn't liquid.
    Banks charge $5.00 just to cash it even if it's drawn at that bank.
    Liquor stores want 2 to 6% of the check just to cash it.

    I'm serious when I say not everyone has a checking account. I can't for various credit reasons, my father couldn't because of a nasty divorce which left him in bankrupcy, with fees it may not be affordable, I may not have enough money to use the checking account.

    Remember, there are people out there scraping by. No matter, why should I take a check from you when I gave you cash?

    1. Re:Joke? by Brento · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No matter, why should I take a check from you when I gave you cash?

      Because I deposited your cash in the bank, and the bank has 2-3 days before that cash is available to me. Therefore, I write you a check so you can get the funds as quickly as I do. Think in terms of Christmas season: you can have hundreds of people buy big-ticket items, only to turn around and return them when the store simply doesn't have the cash on hand. I'd have two choices: keep an abnormally large amount of cash on hand so I can meet cash refund needs at the start of every business day, or I can write you a check.

      And since I don't have to worry about losing your business (since you're already returning the item anyway, and not using a store credit to spend the money in my store) why would I inconvenience myself? Heck no, buddy, if you want your money back from me, you can have it when the banks give it to me, and that's why you get a check.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:Joke? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Um....I have a checkng account....and I am in Bankruptcy too.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:Joke? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      your credit isnt bestbuys problem. did you bounce an insane number of checks? ive never even heard of someone doing a credit check to give you a checking account...banks are usually more than happy to hold onto your money without giving you any interest on it whatsoever...which is the norm for a checking account.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    4. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is common place for a bank to run a credit check on you with the social security number you provide, and if your credit isn't up to snuff no account for you.......it's just the way it works dude

    5. Re:Joke? by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because I deposited your cash in the bank, and the bank has 2-3 days before that cash is available to me.

      You're fault.

      (Mod this +1 Funny, get it)

      Really, Brento you just explained why and how they are fucking me along with the economics that make it a good idea from their standpoint!

    6. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you seriously have to pay five bucks to cash a cheque? Like, converting it directly to cash, or just to deposit it into an account?

      Is that a typical US bank thing?

      I don't think I've ever noticed one of my cheques (I'm in Canada) get docked for service charges. I'm not sure, but I don't think I've ever gotten charged for writing a cheque, either. (Though they did charge me for pre-printed cheques, which was a ripoff, but, whatever.)

    7. Re:Joke? by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Of course it was, and I'm glad you got modded up for the reply. I have been there myself and I still haven't bothered to try to "re-establish a credit rating". If I cannot pay cash for something, I just don't buy . Pretty simple, and it keeps me out of debt.

      I don't figure I'll need a mortgage in my lifetime, so it works for me.

    8. Re:Joke? by shroudedmoon · · Score: 1

      I know this is drifting off topic, but, speaking from experience in the past, there likely ARE ways for you to get a checking account if you go looking for it. It may not be local to you, but a lot of the internet banks, especially (etrade, ING Direct, etc) are usually able to help out.

      For example, if your problems are Checking related (bounced checks, bad accounts, etc), a google for "non chexsystems banks" will bring you lists of banks that don't check chexsystems, which is where all of that stuff goes. (Etrade comes immediately to mind).

      Even if it's straight up credit issues, and most banks these days DO pull credit report for checking accounts, there are banks out there that will approve you. I had good luck with Bank of America when my credit was screwed up after my divorce...

      Just trying to help.

      Mike

    9. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe if you're so bad off that you can't afford to cash a check...


      YOU SHOULDN'T BE BUYING A TV

    10. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to pay five dollars to cash a check if you don't have a checking account in the US. Basically, in the US, most large money transactions are usually done through checking accounts. For example, people are paid checks for working, but can get direct deposit if they have a checking account. Expenses are usually either paid with credit cards or with a check; utility bills, for example, are difficult to pay for with cash.

    11. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a checking account either, and am familiar with the problems you describe. However, I think avoiding remate scams is solid advice for everyone, regardless. And never believe what the sales guy tells you in the store.

    12. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd bet well over 98% of people have a checking account (or some relationship) with a bank that would allow them to cash a check for free or at least have the funds to pay the cashing fee (won't the take it out of the check?). If you're in that remaining 2% you need to concentrate more on how you control your wealth than what Best Buy is charging for a TV.

      Yes, I'm being an asshole but only because A) Financially sound people generally provide more benfit to society as a whole and B) I don't want to be inconvenienced nor do I think Best Buy should have to change their policies because 2% of people can't manage basic financials but still want new TVs.

      What next, are we going to start bitching about next, the independent paycheck cashing places for taking their cut? How about e-tailers that don't take cash or even checks? Damnit, the government won't give me my tax refund back to my credit card even though that's how I paid last year! Screw them bastards!

    13. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is fine, except cash is available immediately, but the refund check can take weeks.

    14. Re:Joke? by jcostom · · Score: 1
      I'm serious when I say not everyone has a checking account. I can't for various credit reasons

      What does your bad credit have to do with having a checking account???

      Each and every time I've opened a checking account, from the first time, when I was 12 (1984) and had a paper route to the latest time, when I was 31 (2003) and opened a new joint checking account with my wife, credit checks were never a part of opening a checking account.

      You go to the bank, fill out the paperwork, provide some ID, an initial deposit, and you're done. I can't think of a bank that doesn't offer a FREE checking plan these days. In fact, I just looked at some of the major banks online (Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Wachovia), and they all have a FREE checking account. Some do require you have at least one Direct Deposit per month for it to be free, but it's still free.

      --

      The unsig!
    15. Re:Joke? by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you bank at, but where I bank, CASH is available immediately. Checks take 2-3 days to be available.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    16. Re:Joke? by netfool · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You missed his point. He gave them cash (as liquid as it gets). They gave him a check (not so liquid). He has to pay a fee just to get his money back into liquid form - even though they were in the wrong (by selling a broke TV).

      Besides, there's nothing wrong with saving up towards something. It's not like he said "I'm Joe Sixpack. I blew my paycheck this weekend on a TV & now I can't afford my mortgage payment... I'm going to lose my house because I wanted a pretty TV."

      --
      Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    17. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your bad credit has left you unable to obtain a checking account? Thats unpossible.

      You are refused your checking account based on the quantity of 'bad checks' that you have written in the past.

      You'd be suprised how easy it is to get a checking account if your just ask nicely at the bank, there are several options for minimum balance checking accounts at several banks.

    18. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!!!! He's proud of using Bankruptcy and Linux...any other shameful things you want to tell us about yourself?

    19. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The latest stats show 20% do not have checking accounts in the US. I wish I could find a link (actually I really mean to say, I wish I wasn't so lazy that I would actually search for the link), but they were just reported a week or so. I was surprised it was so high.

    20. Re:Joke? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Take the money you were going to spend at Best Buy and open a checking account at the bank. You don't need to be spending money on luxury items (that's basically all Best Buy sells other than appliances) when you can't even afford to open a checking account. Once you have a checking account you can use a debit card to draw on the money in your account.

      If that's really not an option and you don't like that policy then shop elsewhere. I would imagine the amount of people that pay for large ticket items with cash and then want a refund is pretty small. Use a credit card or debit card, or again, shop somewhere else.

    21. Re:Joke? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The middle class, for the most part, doesn't pay bounced check fees. Well, ok, it still happens to me every now and then, but it is very rare. Think about it, though... One of the largest and most profitable revenue streams for these mega corporations comes from assaulting the poorest people in America. It seems criminal.

      Frankly his story seems a bit suspicious. Why didn't he just ask for store credit and buy another TV instead? Why didn't they just replace the broken TV with a working one? I've never had a problem taking back a broken item to Best Buy and getting another that works. Hell, I took a broken receiver back, they didn't have any more of that model in stock so they gave me a different brand that cost slightly more for the same price and apologized for the inconvenience. Just because the Best Buy you happen to shop at has horrible customer service doesn't mean they all do. Sure, I could've just returned it and walked away since I used a credit card for the transaction, but I really needed a receiver that weekend. I'm sure you could ask them for a gift card or something instead and just go to another Best Buy store and buy the TV there with the gift card. If you're not dicks to them they should work with you.

    22. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to pay five dollars to cash a check if you don't have a checking account in the US.

      You're full of shit. Don't state this like its universally true for every bank in the US. I've never paid to cash a check at the bank it was drawn on. The most I've ever been asked for is a picture ID and a thumbprint.

    23. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? Good luck buying a house, one of the most financially important things you can do.

    24. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed his point. He gave them cash (as liquid as it gets). They gave him a check (not so liquid). He has to pay a fee just to get his money back into liquid form - even though they were in the wrong (by selling a broke TV). Besides, there's nothing wrong with saving up towards something. It's not like he said "I'm Joe Sixpack. I blew my paycheck this weekend on a TV & now I can't afford my mortgage payment... I'm going to lose my house because I wanted a pretty TV."

      No, you and everyone else are missing the point. There is no practical way for a business to refund large purchases with cash. Its a condition of doing business with them all, pretty much always has been. Its not like this is specific to just the large electronics stores either. Small businesses usually operate the same way.

      If the possibility of having to return something is a serious threat to you, then don't buy one. If you think you can find a better way to do business, you should go start one and show the world how it should be done.

    25. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me fail english? that's unpossible!

    26. Re:Joke? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Because I deposited your cash in the bank, and the bank has 2-3 days before that cash is available to me.

      You want to get yourself a better bank. Here in the UK, if I pay cash into my account, I can walk over to the nearest ATM and draw it right back out again if I want to. Cheques generally take 3-5 days to clear, but cash is instantaneous.

    27. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a national database that all banks check when you apply to open an account of any type. If you owe any bank late fees, overdrawn charges, etc, they will not open the account until you pay the past due fees.

      I have two co-workers this has happened to.

  73. I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually work for company who processes rebates (#2 in this business). We all work incredibly hard to get people their rebates and process (many) millions of them every year.

    If you have to mail your forms and the forms are received and they are valid, you will get your rebate, there is nobody intentionally holding on to your money. If there is a problem, you will be notified and you can always contact our customer support to get it resolved. I can guarantee you that we have VERY dedicated people trying to resolve such issues, and I know it since I work side by side with them every day.

    If you are tired of sending mail, you can just go to shop to (for examples) Staples. You don't have to send anything by mail anymore if you shop there. Just come to their easy rebates website, submit your name and address and you will get the check and soon even direct deposit as Staples announced this week.

    The reason why the rebate process takes so long is actually not technical, one of the mai reasons is policy of manufacturer and retailers. Often the retailers need to protect themself from people who try to commit fraud, buy products, apply for rebates and return them. Mostly due to this reason you have to wait to get it.

    1. Re:I work for rebater by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And of course they like the people who pay the full "before rebate" price, and then never bother with the forms, or who give up after making no headway, etc.

      Rebates have always been a way to lower the 'perceived' price (well, at least for the gullible) without really lowering the price.

      If you want to sell your item based on a 39.95 price, why else would you demand on collecting $80 from me and force me to wait around to get $40 back? Why should *loan* you (retailer, manufacturer, whoever) $40 interest-free?

      If you just changed the price to the intended 'after rebate' price, then you would have to worry about fraud, returns, etc. You wouldnt have the overhead of receiving money and then having to make sure you only gave it back to the 'right people'. In fact, if companies offering rebates can afford to pay a staff to process rebates, they must be making a bundle off people who never get their rebates, otherwise it wouldnt be cost effective.

    2. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it seems like that on your end, but on my end - it's a sham. I would look for better work soon if I were you. The rebate business is going to go down the toilet and it has only itself to blame.

    3. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe your company is reputable and does honor every valid request, but there are many who are not. I personally know a lot of people who did exactly what was requested and never saw their rebate.

      I have also never heard of a rebate center contacting someone because there was a problem with their rebate form. Never. Not once. My impression has always been that if they receive it and they can find the slightest thing wrong, it goes into the trash.

      A friend got so frustrated with being ripped off by rebates not being honored that he began enclosing a note with the rebate forms that read "If this rebate is not received within 6 weeks, I will return the item to the store." He began getting every rebate back in a timely fashion.

    4. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are exactly right about the reason why rebates take so long to return. I know for certain that Best Buy doesn't want you to get your rebate too soon because there are too many people out there who make a living buying products and then sending in for the rebate and then return the item to the store for a refund and walk away with the rebate money. These people who do this are the ones to blame not Best Buy or the rebate companies. It sucks that a few dishonest people out there are screwing it up for the honest ones. That's who you should blame!

    5. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people committing fraud are probably the ones who got burned by the rebater in the first place. Two wrongs don't make a right, but I can understand why someone who has found no legal means of recouping their rebate might resort to such means. In other words, play the same game (fraud) on the rebater that the rebater plays on everyone else.

    6. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And tell me that you don't hire snotty nosed high school kids, at minimum wage, to open the envelopes. The same ones that like to brag at school the next day how they screwed over somebody by "loosing" their UPC code.

      I'm not saying all high school kids are this way, but it only takes one. Nor do kids have a monopoly on anti-social behavior, but I do recall that type bragging from back in my HS daze. Although it usually involved spitting in hamburgers, or rifling desks in the offices they were cleaning.

    7. Re:I work for rebater by wytcld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does your firm to processing for Sirius Satellite Radio? I just got a letter denying a rebate on a radio and year's subscription bought as a Xmas gift for the girlfriend. It was a form letter saying that I had not met at least one of a list of six specified conditions - without saying which. Thing is, I'd met every one. I'd even called Sirius before buying the radio and subscription to double check that the particular radio model was included, and that buying a whole year's service met the requirement to buy at least a month's service.

      When I called Sirius, I got a totally friendly guy who'd been answering calls from people who'd gotten these letters all day. He expects that Sirius will pay every single rebate, and said the letters were obviously sent out "in error." He didn't tell me which firm Sirius had hired to send out the many "in error" denial letters, but I sure hope Sirius has learned its lesson a about hiring that particular rebate-processing firm. Was it yours?

      Meanwhile, no word at all from NewEgg about the rebate on the flat-screen monitor I also bought her for Xmas. Which is too bad - the last time I buy from that firm of formerly good repute. The previous purchase from them was two memory cards with a rebate that was "limit two," and got a card back saying they'd only give the rebate on one of them. They backed down when I got irate, but this repeat experience suggests they're just a bit crooked about rebates, probably as policy.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    8. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you are saying makes common sense but it is completely incorrect in reality.

      It is cost effective because the whole reason why the rebates exists is how they are accounted for on company books. The full price you pay is one item on company balance sheet and the rebate they have to pay is another. By separating them like that it effects how the company why offers rebate reports revenue and profit and calculates taxes.

    9. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot say for 100% (laze to go look it up on the weekend :-) but I think we do not process Sirius (or they are so small that I haven't heard about them).

      You have to understand that things like this happen in every business, regardless who is your rebate processing company. It happend with insurance, banks, etc. When the volumes are high mistakes happen.

      Between Thanksgiving and end of January most people at our places worked weekends and nights just to ensure that the systems are running properly and people get their rebates since the volumes in this season went over the roof.

      Regardless of what people are saying here, customers love rebates, they are sending them more and more and they will not go away (see above, it all has to do with accounting).

      What is more likely going to happen is that rebates will go towards paperless submission and electronic deposits.

    10. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually you are mistaken. Companies love rebates because it helps them to learn who their customers are The serious companies who cares about their customers always fulfill them since that will help them to gain their customer loyalty and become repeated customers.

      So my prediction is actually that the business will grow because companies like our. We bring transparency to the process. You can come to websites providing by us all call phone number and you can track status of your rebate any time of the day.

      The only way you will not get your rebate is that either you didn't satisfied the conditions OR the manufacturer (or who ever runs the rebate) is not paying their bills to us.

    11. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many companies in the business and the business isconsolidating. #1 just bought #3. We are at this time #2 but hopefully not for long. We are totally changing the business by eliminating as much manual processing as possible. Instead we spend the human resources on handling customer service.

      You can track you rebates on websites we provide for manufacturers and retailers 24/7 or call our IVR. If you send the rebate and we have received it, you will have a mean how to track it. If something goes wrong and we think you are invalid YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED. Period. We will send you postcard so you have it on the paper. You can always call to our customer service and talk with them if you think we are incorrect. I know those people and if it happens that an mistake was made (e.g. some piece of information was lost or was miskeyed) it will be corrected and you will get your check.

      Actually what your friend is doing makes no impact on the rebated. People who key the rebates may not even speak english, they do not read what your friend writes. Once the rebate is keyd in, the processing is completely automated. Maybe what happened is that the retailer where your friend shops started paying their bills on time :-)

    12. Re:I work for rebater by Llewyn · · Score: 1
      (or they are so small that I haven't heard about them)...
      It happend with insurance, banks, etc.

      uh huh. yeah.
      forgive my intrusion on this "i'm afraid not/so" argument you guys have going on, but this kind of stuff irks me. it;s the same reason i switched banks recently. my (former) bank misrouted a deposit, but told me it had cleared (two week wait), and then removed all the deposited cash due to NSF. when receiving the check, it had clearly been sent to a competitor bank (not the proper one) for clearing, but i was out several hundred dollars for their mistake. and their reason (drumroll please...):

      "Washington Mutual is probably just a tiny bank, so they don't have their own clearings"
      so you must forgive me waving the BS Flag, but i see this kind of excuse as just that. Sirius is all over the market now, and in places like BB, Fry's, etc. If you're reading /. chances are you would have already heard about this company from here, here, and here most recently.

      to put it bluntly: AC, don't give me that line of crap.

    13. Re:I work for rebater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also work for a rebate fulfillment house (a smaller one than the parent, there's actually lots of them out there). His comments are 100% correct, but I'd like to add a few things.

      1) I have NEVER worked with any manufacturer or retailer who was out to intentionally defraud a consumer. Every company we've done rebates for has always paid the promised amount.

      2) What a lot of people fail to realize is that everyone makes mistakes. This includes the fulfillment house, but also the manufacturer, retailer, the USPS, and the consumer.

      3) Yes, there is an enormous amount of rebate fraud out there. From my experience, anywhere from 20 to 40% of all rebates are invalid for various reasons. Fraud accounts for most of these.

      4) Like the parent, we do send out notices if there is a problem with your rebate. However, so many consumers have bought in to the belief that all rebates are frauds/scams that if they make a mistake, it's not their fault but we did it on purpose.

      5) Finally, we've learned that no matter how hard you try for 100% customer satisfaction, there will always be someone you can never satisfy. Ironically, these are usually the ones who are clearly the ones committing rebate fraud OR the ones who say that they're also in customer service.

    14. Re:I work for rebater by PW2 · · Score: 1

      I check for spit filled hamburger every time. I'm always prepared to jump the counter and dip the culprit's head in the fryer, but haven't had to do that yet.

    15. Re:I work for rebater by Snwbeast · · Score: 1

      I bought a monitor last year from Office Depot and after submitting the two rebates received a postcard in the mail. The postcard claimed that I was denied the rebate since the date was out of the approved purchase window. Funny thing since the other rebate was approved, and they were for the same time-frame. Long story short I called the 800 number and they noticed that for the second rebate they had filed it as if I were living in Hawaii (which had a different time-frame for the rebate start and end.) I pointed out that nowhere in my address or on the receipt did it say anything about Hawaii and they agreed over the phone to reprocess the rebate. Granted it took another 4 weeks after that to get a check, but I did actually get both rebates paid out. On the other hand if I hadn't gotten the postcard explaining I was denied I likely wouldn't have ever gotten the second rebate (naturally it was the $50 rebate that was initially denied, not the $30 one...)

    16. Re:I work for rebater by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

      After reading the other comments on here I weighed my 2 centavos. My experience is that the smaller rebates pass by, the larger ones are "challenged" in some way. I was forced to call the rebate center processing my $150 Comcast rebate and was told that I would have to "resubmit" as there was "some problem". I informed the lackey on the other end that I had full photocopies of everything I sent in and was going to send it to the PostMaster General along with a formal complaint of mail fraud. It took 2 minutes for him to get authorization to cut my check.
      1st - why did I have to call them and not the other way around if there was a problem?
      2nd - There is no way anyone can convince me this wasn't deliberate. Seeing how I had to send in the original receipts and such the scam was almost complete in that I would *not* be able to resubmit under the rules. Except for anal people like me that wear tin-hats and document everything they would have gotten away with it.
      Bahhhh - rebates.
      regards,

    17. Re:I work for rebater by dandrayan · · Score: 1

      It's like the old saying... You can satisfy all of the people some of the time and you can satisfy some of the people all the time. We don't live in a perfect world.

  74. ROTFL! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    You are kidding right?

    I've talked on the phone with, and exchanged letters with, many Best Buy workers on the reward issue. They simply don't have me in the system (it's actually my gf, but neither name is there).

    And otherwise I'm serious. I just don't shop at Best Buy - Circuit City and others are just as close to my house. I just don't do business with companies who's policy makes being a customer hard work (my local Wal-Mart can attest to that fact).

    And no, I'm usually the one who doesn't complain about the bosses' demands.

    1. Re:ROTFL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just don't do business with companies who's policy makes being a customer hard work

      Yet you shop at Circuit City? They practically gang rape me when I walk in. I hate stores that sell on a commission basis. I don't ever read there ads anymore because it's very hard to buy the advertised product, when they try so hard to up sell you.

  75. USPS losses by sometwo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how much the USPS (and the rebate fulfillment companies) are going to lose from this.

    1. Re:USPS losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, don't get me started ... too late.

      What amazes me is that if the tax collector claims to have mailed you your tax bill, you're deemed to have been delivered it, legally.

      Fortunately, when it happened to me, it was the smallest of my tax bills ( US$20 ).

  76. Free checking accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This isn't meant to belittle your economic situation, but:

    Have you gone to different banks to see what their checking account policies are? There are banks who will set up free checking accounts if you enroll in direct deposit. I don't know if any minimum balance is involved.

    1. Re:Free checking accounts? by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      look at what you typed, then get back to me...

    2. Re:Free checking accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked the website of my bank, US Bank, which happens to be based in the same city as Best Buy--Minneapolis.

      US Bank has three checking account types listed which have no minimum balance and no minimum monthly maintenance fee: Free Checking with Interest, Silver Elite Checking (55+) and Student Checking.

      The interest paid on the accounts varies according to how much money you have and where the account is based.

      All of these accounts come with a free US Bank Visa Check Card with a rewards program as well.

      Now you may not have US Bank where you live (it's mostly in the central US), but other banks may offer similar free checking accounts.

    3. Re:Free checking accounts? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ummm - that assumes you have a regular job and something to "direct deposit" with.

    4. Re:Free checking accounts? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, checking acounts with DD are free for you, but not for your employer. Its something some companies do for employee convinience, but a lot of smaller and non-profit places dont do it because it does cost them money.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  77. Maybe I'm the only one... by Rai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but I ignore rebates altogether when I'm shopping for electronics and such. I don't even allow them to be a factor in my buying decision. The amount I'm paying for an item will always be, in my mind, the amount they charge me at the register, regardless of whatever rebate it promises me.

    If BestBuy has something for $100 with a $50 MIR, but the guys down the street are selling the same thing for $75, I'm buying it from the guys down the street. I've never found MIRs to be reliable and I have and always will be willing to pay a bit more than the "after-rebate-price" to avoid them. Now, if I do buy something that has a rebate, I'll go ahead and send it in, provided it's a worthwhile amount ($20 or more) and I'm not too concerned about destroying the packaging of the item by cutting the UPC off the box. In this case, I just consider MIR a sort of bonus win (like a lucky lottery ticket) and not part of the amount I'm saving from the store.

    Am I just being a stubborn consumer or do others have a similar attitude?

    1. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I dont buy consumer electronics at retail all that often - but anytime I've considered doing so I've prety much figured the same way - However much cash I have to bring to the store is the price of the item.

      In fact, I've always thought it would be entertaining, if a store advertised (eg) "39.95 (in huge print) - after $30 and $50 rebates (in tiny print)" to go to the store, bringing exactly 39.95 (plus enough for tax, etc) and take the item to the register, and hand them that amount at the check out, and when they wanted more, pointed out (very vocally and very angrily) that the price displayed was 39.95, not the higher amount, and then after they (presumably) refused to let me out the door paying only the "advertised" price, walked out the door leaving the item there, and making lots of noise about it as I did so - the whold point being to A. force them to deal with an unhappy (lost) customer, B. have to carry the item back and put it on the shelf again, and C. call as much attention to I could (both to the store, as well as any other customers at the registers, etc) that they had lost a sale over the stupidity.

    2. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by kjamez · · Score: 1


      Am I just being a stubborn consumer or do others have a similar attitude?


      i have a very similar attitude, mostly refusing the bother even taking the MIR form. i fully agree my thoughts on price don't reflect the MIR, and if i get it it is an added bonus.

      Some years ago, however, i purchased two Samsung SyncMaster 151v's (15" lcds) at Bestbuy for $249.00 US/ea, which wasn't incredibly expensive for an lcd at the time, but came with $100 rebate on each. Fine print didn't mention 'one per household', and about six weeks later i went out and bought many many many drinks for many many people armed with my newly cashed $200 cheque.

      Outside of that one experience, i have never recieved any other rebate, nor do i write down dates or photocopy anything as i generally just don't care, because we all know MIR are just a way for you to make you feel like you are spending less money at the time. it's the same reason we make everything $19.99 instead of $20- , it sound cheaper.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    3. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by kjamez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In fact, I've always thought it would be entertaining, if a store advertised (eg) "39.95 (in huge print) - after $30 and $50 rebates (in tiny print)" to go to the store, bringing exactly [......]
      walked out the door leaving the item there, and making lots of noise about it as I did so - the whold point being to A. force them to deal with an unhappy (lost) customer, B. have to carry the item back and put it on the shelf again, and C. call as much attention to I could (both to the store, as well as any other customers at the registers, etc) that they had lost a sale over the stupidity.


      a little off topic, but i think that is a reasonable action for any poor customer service. I did it in the food store once. I [almost] bought $140us worth of food, and one single six pack of newcastle. I ran into a friend in line buying some chips or something, he was behind me, and because we were 'talking to one another' they needed to see his ID for me to purchase my beer ... he is 20. i tried to reason with them, but ended up just saying 'if i can't buy the beer then i don't want any of this, i'll go to another store' so someone at that store ended up putting back all my frozen goods and meats and everything.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    4. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't poor customer service. Stores can not (at least in California; if you live elsewhere where laws are different let us know) sell alcohol to underage people without being effectivley put out of business (paying huge fines, losing their liquor license, etc.). What law enforcment does is have under-21 undercover agents try and purchase alcohol; if they succeed, it's curtains for the company that sold the alcohol.

      The reason the law is really anal about this is because underage people are more likely to drink and drive, killing people; these laws save lives.

    5. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Inconnux · · Score: 1

      you're not the only one... I ignore them too, and when a pushy salesman points them out, I tell them that I have NEVER received a check back when I have sent them in.

    6. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Eil · · Score: 1



      and when they wanted more, pointed out (very vocally and very angrily) that the price displayed was 39.95, not the higher amount,

      Won't matter, they will just point out the little asterisk next to 39.95 that directs you further down to the fine print where they list the actual price of the item. If that asterisk and fine print were missing, then you would have a leg to stand on (and a legal one at that), but the fine print means everything. Is the practice theoretically deceptive? Yes, but you would still end up being the one ridiculed, not the peons who work there. They could really give a shit less what you were made to believe the price was. Plus, they usually have to put up with far worse than price misunderstandings on any given day.

    7. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      he wasn't underage- it was his friend, whom he happened to run into and be talking to in line. they assumed that his friend was with him, and that he might be buying beer for his friend.

    8. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      I stopped shopping at Best Buy. They have the worst customer service on the planet. Have you ever tried to call their computer department to ask if they have something in stock? I tried to return software once, and they would not take it back. It was opened, but I had a very good reason. This was back when the 2 OS's were Windows 98 and Windows NT. Windows 2000 just came out, and I saw some software (a game) that said Windows 98 on the back. I asked if it would run with Windows 2000, and the idiot there said "Oh sure... Windows 2000 is the newest 98, it'll run". So I made the purchase, and when it did not work, I took it back, and some ASSHOLE who worked there accused me of being a software pirate saying "That is the only reason people return software". Fuck him, and FUCK BUTTBUY. They sell shit, they wrap it is shit, sell it by assholes, and are run by jews. I will never shop there again. My hate for them is huge, I think the world would be a better place is every shitbuy store was struck with lighting from Gods angry hands and burned to the ground.

      Circuit City is better. At least they treat customers like human beings. They don't lie as much as the people at Best Buy, and I actually had a sales guy tell me "I don't know, I'm new" to a question. WOW, honesty, what a new concept.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    9. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Making the poor cashier deal with a customer ranting and raving isn't going to do anything at all. Cashiers can't do anything for you, and no one higher up will listen to a word they say. Maybe if you talk to a manager someone might care, but that's unlikely too. Most of the management probably doesn't have any power either.

    10. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      And this my friends is why everyone should work in retail at least once in their lives.

      The poor person behind the counter isn't at fault for the advertising, nor the policy. I work retail (though blessedly not with computers) and we mock our own advertisements, sales, and policies just as much as anyone else would.

      With point's A and C all you'd be doing is making an ass of yourself, really. A big company the size of Fry's/BB/Comp/et al doesn't give a shit about losing a single customer. And the cashier would frankly prefer if they never had to see you again in their life.

      Point B is just immature, and again punishing the cashier (and possibly not even the same cashier! Depending on the store, a lot of 'go backs' don't go back til the end of the night, or til a cashier has lots of free time) instead of punishing the retailer. And from then on you'll be remembered by all the associates in view as 'that asshole that can't read' and probably not at all by the other customers after a day or two.

      Bill

    11. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1
      They sell shit, they wrap it is shit, sell it by assholes, and are run by jews.

      I agree with that Best Buy is not the place for an educated consumer to shop. They sell a lot of sparkly stuff and there are a lot of people who have attitude problems that work the registers, and maybe have poor management (but I know one Best Buy manager, known her for 10 years, and she's pretty cool).

      But "run by Jews?" I am not Jewish, nor do I know or care the religious backgrounds of the management at Best Buy, but why would you make such a statement? That kind of comment lies back in 1895 along with, "Coloreds Only" and "Micks need not apply." C'mon, man, you can't say stuff like this in the 21st century and have anyone take you seriously. I would have agreed with "A bunch of short-sighted rich people who care more for short term profit over long term customer loyalty," or even "Capalist Corporate Asshats." But "run by Jews?" What are you, Eric Cartman?

      And don't get me started on Circuit City. I don't know where you're from, but the CC around here are wastelands of hungry commision sharks who ignore anyone not making a lage purchase. There have been times when I have seen so little help on the floor or manning a register, and the store such a mess, that I have wondered if all the employees are gagged in the back room, and I came in right after a mass robbery.

      Once, before I knew better, I had to get a VCR. At the time, we were poor. We saw one for $79, and asked a salesguy for help getting one. He disaapeared, and never came back. Another guy tried to upsell us to a $400 one. We said, "No... we want the cheap one." Then he said they were out, buy the $400. He then treated my wife, my technically competent wife who is head of IT at her company, like she was some dumbass giggly housewife out of a 1950's stereotype who could easily be manipulated by flattery and thus, makes the buying decisions in our house by possibly withholding sex or something. GREATLY insulted, we both left, and got one form Radio Shack (which then died two years later).

      Oh, and two rebates I got from them never came back, either.

    12. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yes, Im not suggesting that you'd have any chance of getting out of there paying the lower price.

      The point is to make a scene about it, let them and ever other customer within earshot know you feel deceived and are upset.

    13. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by kjamez · · Score: 1

      that's my point exactly. i was buying this alcohol, along with 150$ worth of food, for myself. it was a coincidence that i got hasseled for a friend who was in line and happened to speak to me. had he not spoken to me, i could have purchased the alcohol. and the brits talk about alcohol promoting antisocial behaviour ... it WAS poor customer service for the clerk not to see that his being there was not planned (and most kids that would ask you to buy alcohol would have the brains to wait outside) ... and then, what is the cutoff? if i had a child, could i purchase he or she alchol on my whim? if i have a six year old in my arms buying a six pack of beer, does the six year old have to proove s/he is of legal drinking age? i work in a liquor store a few days a week (for discounts :) ) people 'sting' all the time with fake id's and whatnot, and it's a loss of liscense or fine or whatever, but paranoia is no reason to interogate (sp) a valid legal drinking-age customer for his purchase. use common sense.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    14. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by winwar · · Score: 1

      "The poor person behind the counter isn't at fault for the advertising, nor the policy. I work retail (though blessedly not with computers) and we mock our own advertisements, sales, and policies just as much as anyone else would."

      True. But that doesn't mean you aren't responsible for them (advertising/policy). Or maybe it would be better to say associated with it. If you work there you are at least partly responsible for how the company operates-it doesn't matter that you have little or no power to change things.

      You have to expect to be ridiculed for the actions of the company. To be the one that gets yelled at, while the VP who decided the policy plays golf. You are the face of the company to the consumer. And the consumer doesn't really care if he/she is ridiculed out of sight. It's not right, but that's life.

      Remember, if the employer couldn't get willing employees, they might have to change things. If you have to have the job, it sucks. If you don't, it still sucks. Either way you made a choice to associate with people of questionable ethics-don't be surprised if it reflects on you.

    15. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Rai · · Score: 1

      In fact, I've always thought it would be entertaining, if a store advertised (eg) "39.95 (in huge print) - after $30 and $50 rebates (in tiny print)" to go to the store, bringing exactly 39.95 (plus enough for tax, etc) and take the item to the register, and hand them that amount at the check out, and when they wanted more, pointed out (very vocally and very angrily) that the price displayed was 39.95, not the higher amount, and then after they (presumably) refused to let me out the door paying only the "advertised" price, walked out the door leaving the item there, and making lots of noise about it as I did so - the whold point being to A. force them to deal with an unhappy (lost) customer, B. have to carry the item back and put it on the shelf again, and C. call as much attention to I could (both to the store, as well as any other customers at the registers, etc) that they had lost a sale over the stupidity.

      No offense, but you'd be a real assholes for that. Consider that a big retail store like Best Buy is staffed with worker bees who have zero say in policy. Treating them badly will accomplish nothing to change the way the company works (which I'm sure you realize is decided by faceless corporate execs out of an office building in some unknown location.) The "worker bees" are your only one-on-one interface to the company for this very reason. If anything, you should try being polite and understanding to the them. It won't do any more to change things, but you might be surprised how much a good employee will try to do something extra for a good customer. No employee, good or bad, wants to do anything at all for an asshole customer.

    16. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by kjamez · · Score: 1

      No offense, but you'd be a real assholes for that. Consider that a big retail store like Best Buy is staffed with worker bees who have zero say in policy.

      i only left everything after trying to politely reason with the clerk about the validity of my alcohol purchase. i've worked in retail land a number of years, and have excellent customer service. i even go above and beyond (for the customer) and let obviously legitiment (although sometimes against company policty) things happen like: maybe the next guy in line isn't really with this guy just because he said hello, or: can i exchange this cd i bought, i don't have my ticket?

      it was a large purchase in a food store, i am 25 years old, and they would not sell me six 12oz beers because someone else in the same line as me couldn't produce an id? that's not policy, thats assanine. everyone on /. always says speak with your wallet, and at that point i decided if i was going to be treated poorly i would buy my food elsewhere. i didn't throw things, or cause a ruckus, but i sure as well wasn't going to go return my cart (now all bagged up) to the shelves.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    17. Re:Maybe I'm the only one... by Rai · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the portion of the post which I quoted in italics (arguing about the "advertised" price), not the beer purchase situation.

      In the case of the grocery store, you're correct in that it was an assanine thing to do. I would have politely asked for the store manager to make a decision. If he/she said the same thing, I would have probably left everything at the register and left as well.

  78. Statistics say that many will not send them in by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1
    Mail In rebates are a sham, in that it takes 8-12 weeks for the check to come in. I am not going to wait 3 months for a 2 dollar check.
    The true essence of the scam is that some percentage of people will never send them in, like you. Corporations know this and make use of it.

    I have also encountered problems in the past with rebates where the company sends back a letter saying the copy of the receipt was illegible or whatever. It is frustrating.
    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  79. Re:Mail-in skam... by wganz · · Score: 1

    I've mailed in a lot of these and have yet to get anything back. Now, when I goto buy something, I base my purchase price on what is listed. When the sales staff tries to tell me about the mail-in discount, I offer to trade them the receipts for 75% of the mail-in rebate's value in cash. None have ever taken me up on it.

    Money talks and BS walks. If it was real, then they could do it in the store.

  80. Re:Mail-in sham... -Go to Staples instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Staples Easy Rebates - Online entry of rebates, you have your check in about a week to 10 days. Fast, quick and easy to use.

  81. Class Action's by Deinesh · · Score: 1

    Yes and No. Class actions may not benifit the victims as much as the lawyer's but it sure does hurt the company's. Class action's are an indispensable tool to keep company's in line.

  82. Not a scam - we almost always get rebates by Chuck+Messenger · · Score: 1

    We buy alot of stuff (often via Slickdeals.net) at tremendous prices, and typically involving 1+ rebates. I'd say we submit about 20+ rebates a year. Failing to receive a rebate is a very rare occurrance -- maybe 1 a year. What used to happen, before we became more careful, is that we screwed up in various ways: waited too long, failed to follow instructions, etc. But when we've done everything right on our end, we pretty much always get the rebate.

    So, no, it is not a scam, in our experience.

    The purpose of a rebate is to allow for a flexible price, while not _appearing_ to. A business, in general, can optimize the amount of money it makes by charging a given person the maximum amount of money that person is willing to pay. Ever see Tin Man? I love the exchange:

    Q "So how much is this car?"

    A "How much have you got?"

    or something like that. With a rebate, only those people who most want the low price will go to the trouble. The price after rebate is set so that you hopefully don't _lose_ money when people return the rebates. The margin comes from the people who don't return them. Classic. I don't see anything wrong with it (unless the business fails to make a profit -- but that's their problem).

    Here's another mechanism a business could use to implement flexible pricing (which you may not like as much) how about if you had to haggle for everything you buy?

    Clerk: "This here one's a real _beauty_ of a TV. Best they make!"

    You: "How much is it?"

    Clerk: "How much have you got?"

  83. Wanna kill rebates? by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If stores were required to post the out of pocket price in bold this would all come to a stop....VERY quickly.

  84. Sooooo off topic by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I've got a US Bank, sure.

    Trust me though, when you've never got money a checking account doesn't make sense. I wish I could find statistics on this...

    Google gives me this:

    The Check Cashing Customer

    It is clear that for a large number of Americans our locations are the financial institutions of choice. Several studies have pointed out that people are aware of other alternatives but choose to use check cashers or other non-bank facilities in lieu of, or in addition to, depository institutions. These customers are savvy enough to decide the best service for their particular needs. According to the Federal Reserve Board's 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances, people without checking accounts said they did not use banks because they did not write enough checks, don't like dealing with banks, or felt the fees were too high. The recently released "Survey of Non-Bank Financial Institutions" conducted by Dove Consulting for the Department of the Treasury found that check cashers offer customers convenient locations, use the language of their customers and are open longer hours than banks. A survey conducted by Dove this year found nine languages spoken at non-bank financial institutions. Ninety six percent of the check cashers were open on Saturdays and more than a quarter on Sundays. A July 1999 Federal Reserve Bulletin article prepared by the Board's Division of Consumer and Community Affairs concluded that "even on the grounds of price competition, basic-banking accounts may not be competitive with alternative providers when the total cost of use expected by a lower-income customer is considered."

    It is instructive to note that many people who do not have traditional bank accounts did have transaction accounts in the past. The Board's 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances reported that 47.9 percent of them previously had a checking account. People do not lack bank accounts because they are unaware of how to obtain one. They are choosing other alternatives based on their own experiences. Contrary to the clear wishes of these consumers, some advocates continue to insist that everyone must have a traditional checking account. Our industry believes that it is more important that consumers' financial needs be served through a network of neighborhood, consumer friendly locations rather than solely through an ATM card.
    http://www.fisca.org/firstaccountstestimony.htm

    Imagine, not everyone has a blackberry and 10 ATM/Credit/Debit/Gift cards at all times. People still drink dirty water in America when others drink Starbucks...

    "Free" checking is rarely free too... my gf works at the 6th largest bank and they make a fortune from fees alone. That is why customer service is the worst job at the company.
    1. Re:Sooooo off topic by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, but why use a bank? Use a credit union instead and you will not have to worry about those fees. Credit unions also tend to have slightly better savings rates....if that's what you are into.

    2. Re:Sooooo off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me though, when you've never got money a checking account doesn't make sense.

      And buying a DVD player or computer does?

  85. This after my latest rebate hassle with them... by Lostman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sigh... someone at their fulfillment center decided they needed the money more than I did and entered my rebate information to get sent to them. Lovely.

    Had to end up filing a complaint with the better business bureau to get it fixed. They finally are going to resend it to me - just last week in fact.

    This couldnt happen sooner (rebates ending).

  86. I can't afford to be poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's too expensive. Seriously.

    Poor people have to pay bounced check fees, late fees, alarmingly high interest rates, frequent car repairs, etc., etc.

    I remember a time in my life when, after I had paid out all of my bills, if I had $5 left in my pocket, I was doing well. And then to get slapped with a $30 bounced check fee, it was an outrageous amount of money that had a cascade effect on my finances. The following month, something else would go unpaid because the banking fees were taken off the top of my next deposit. And heaven help you if you wrote a lot of little checks that processed after the first one bounced; you can rack up a few hundred dollars in bounced check fees for less than $10 of actual spending.

    The middle class, for the most part, doesn't pay bounced check fees. Well, ok, it still happens to me every now and then, but it is very rare. Think about it, though... One of the largest and most profitable revenue streams for these mega corporations comes from assaulting the poorest people in America. It seems criminal.

    I cringe when I see these check cashing retail stores, because they're such a ripoff... but at least they're upfront about ripping poor people off, unlike the banks.

    1. Re:I can't afford to be poor by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      There's nothing inherent in being poor that forces you to write bad checks. If you can't tell when one number is bigger than another, then you shouldn't have a checking account.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  87. Rebates Allow to Cheat on my Federal Taxes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like rebates because i can claim the full amount of the item as a tax expense, then receive a portion of the amount back as cash!

    so fuck you, IRS!

  88. Maybe I'm a doofus, but... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    I kind of like mail-in rebates. I've never NOT gotten a rebate back--maybe I'm a master form-filler--and it always seems like a getting money in the mail when I get the rebate back.

    I guess that sounds kind of stupid. But I likes it.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  89. I got 3 sticks of RAM for FREE! by ylikone · · Score: 1

    On three separate occasions I purchased 128M sticks of RAM from Best Buy when they had a mail-in rebate that made them free. I sent in the rebate all 3 times and got a cheque all 3 times. I also got 2 free wired 4-port routers from FutureShop in the past using mail-in rebates. I prefer instant rebates but mail-in rebates will do when the deal is really good.

    --
    Meh.
  90. Misunderstanding by sanelly · · Score: 1

    I work for BestBuy and I doubt that this is ENTIRELY true.

    Because, in addition to manufacturer's rebates, BestBuy always offers our own "BestBuy Rebates" in order to lower down the price even more. And I suspect that when BestBuy says they are eliminating all rebates it means only the ones offered by our company. I think the manufacturer's rebates will continue to be there for years to come.

  91. I have saved literally... by bob670 · · Score: 1

    thousands of dollars with rebates. Anyone who can't handle this procedure is either lazy or stupid, it is just too simple. And people who act like they "don't have the time to be bothered" are trying to convince themselves, not everyone else. That's too bad, there are a lot of reasons I don't shop at Best Buy often, now there is one more.

    1. Re:I have saved literally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. Rebates are yet another tax on the lazy and stupid. Being neither, I benefit from them regularly... If you keep copies, the only way you won't get paid is if the company goes out of business, or if you are a wimp on the phone.

      With rebates right now you can get hard drives at $0.25/GB. Try that without them...

  92. Here's the real reason by darylb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The money quote: In fact, more than 80 percent of consumers surveyed by NPD Group of New York last fall said they sent in their rebate forms.

    Just having consumers hate the rebates isn't enough. Rebates only work for sellers and manufcaturers if a substantial number of people fail to send them in. That is, they bought the product, probably having been persuaded by the rebate, then never sent in the rebate materials. I recall several articles in the past (no links, sorry) that explains how if the number of rebate submissions approaches 100% of purchases, then it's cheaper for manufacturers and sellers to cut the price. The rebate overhead, of course, is what really makes this happen.

    So, an 80% submission rate is probably close enough to 100% that sellers/manufacturers aren't seeing the kind of return they're used to. Who cares whether the buyers like rebates? What matters is whether they file for and receive the rebates. Now that the FTC is cracking down on that second part (i.e., companies not paying off on the advertised rebates), where's the upside for the companies?

    1. Re:Here's the real reason by evilviper · · Score: 1
      where's the upside for the companies?

      I'd say that getting to keep the money for an extra 8 weeks is a nice upside for them. Interest rates aren't very high right now, but millions of dollars that you can be earning interest on for 8 weeks is a pretty good deal.

      Plus, 80% isn't anywhere near 100%, so they are still making plenty of money on it.

      I'd say it really is angry customers that is causing the change. I personally hate Walmart, and haven't shopped there for several years, but I must admit that I've been tempted to start buying my electronics there, just because they have the same items at $10 less up-front, rather than having a $20 mail-in rebate...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  93. Catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA
    "The company said it would shift its promotional spending to programs like its "Reward Zone," where customers pay an up-front fee but earn points toward future discounts."

    Pay $10-20 and get points todwards a discount. Nothing like a deferred rebate, what about a year or two?

  94. Stock Rebate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the company said it expects to earn 27 cents to 32 cents per share. Analysts were expecting 38 cents per share, minus a nickel per share for stock-based compensation. That would put the high end of Best Buy's guidance a penny below analyst expectations."

    Sorry, to get your dividend, you must mail in proof of your stock purchase (photocopies).

  95. I am very disappointed by this... by fmaxwell · · Score: 0

    I'm looking at a 19" monitor that I got for $-10 after rebates. My computer has a 200GB hard drive that cost me $22 after rebates. I'm accessing the Internet through an SMC WiFi 802.11G router that cost me 98 cents after rebates. I just did my taxes with Taxcut and filed electronically. The total price for federal, state, and electronic filing will be $10 after rebates. My girlfriend and I got Sony T610 mobile phones with camera, color screen, organizer features, etc. The after-rebate price on EACH phone was $-175.

    Rebates let me profit off of the laziness of others. To all of the smug people who proudly proclaim that they "ignore" rebates, I say "thank you!" You're helping to subsidize my purchases. I would much prefer that I get a hard drive for $80 after rebate and that you buy the same one for $150 and never claim your rebate. That's much better than both of us getting the hard drive for $115 with no rebates.

    If you think, for a moment, that Best Buy is doing this to please customers, you're on drugs! Best Buy is only doing this to combat their so-called "devil customers" -- the ones who come in and take advantage of loss-leaders and giant rebates without also buying $18.99 Britney Spears CDs, 8-packs of batteries, non-discounted DVD players, LCD TVs, etc.

    1. Re:I am very disappointed by this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep. It was a Best Buy exec a while ago that called us "devil-customers"!

      http://forums.firingsquad.com/firingsquad/board/me ssage?board.id=hotdeals&message.id=270&jump=true

    2. Re:I am very disappointed by this... by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative
      You DO realize of course, that you are required, by law, to pay tax on the full price of the item, not the price-after-rebate, right?

      In most cases, you're not getting the discount you think you are (if you aren't also calculating the tax you pay on the full-price item + your stamp to mail in the MIR, etc.), and if your CPA is telling you that you can claim the tax on the after-rebate cost, he's wrong, and he's putting you in jeapordy (or risk of an audit).

      Be careful how you approach these MIR incentives, they could put you at risk, if you file them incorrectly.

    3. Re:I am very disappointed by this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales tax is mandatory when purchasing the item and the customer can't take the item out of the store without paying said sales tax.

      There is no post-sales tax that you have to pay for owning something (you can sometimes get deductions for things you bought and use for business, however).

    4. Re:I am very disappointed by this... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      State sales tax is collected at the time of sale on the full amount of the purchase, but that's hardly a big deal if you're paying $150 for a hard drive and getting $80 back. And then you put stamps on two or three rebate forms so it's like only getting $75 back. Not a bad deal.

      As to 'claiming the tax', I'm not sure what you mean. I pay income tax to the feds, not sales tax. Sales tax is paid at the time of sale. Are you suggesting that the state might audit me for paying sales tax on $150 even though I got $80 in rebates?

  96. Two Years? by Ranger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well if Best Buy is going to eliminate rebates within two years, I guess I can wait two years before shopping there again.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  97. READ The *ucking Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The percentage of people who collect rebates is 80% or 80 percent or Eighty Percent, no 2-11%.

  98. Screw BB... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... Just buy the stuff online, where the "rebates" are already factored in.

    I'm still waiting on several rebates for a number of years, this is really a scam, and I haven't bought anything at Best Buy, CompUSA, or any of these other places for years...

    (anything where the tax is less than shipping, I go with J&R, where tax is more than shipping I go online)

  99. don't be silly by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 0
    He didn't mention a "conspiracy theory." He merely pointed out that the guy used BB's stock symbol in his post, possibly demonstrating a bias towards Best Buy. I mean, why would anyone use BB's stock symbol when speaking of BB on slashdot. Does he own stock in Best Buy?

    Now, that doesn't mean his example was wrong, but perhaps his bias towards Best Buy has an influence on his opinion of waiting 3, 6, 12 months or more to get that $50 dollar rebate, if it even shows up in the mail at all. Also, how do we really know his "random" example was really random?

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:don't be silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really is the difference between using BBY and BB as you have? Well, his was a bit more clear. It is somewhat common to abreviate companies names by their stock symbol (especially if you deal with them often - how do you know he isn't a broker?). I see biasedness in your questioning his biasness (just as there is in mine of yours).

  100. segmentation by sucati · · Score: 1

    I see this as effectively raising prices for those of us who send rebates, since it will eliminate segmentation. Segmentation is the concept of getting customers to pay as much as the are willing to for a product. Here's a great article on Joel on Software on pricing. I don't see how best buy can offer the same deals after rebate, w/o rebates since they are eliminating the surplus from the folks that don't send them in. I'm also a bit skeptical of the 80% figure.

  101. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You claim its not a scam, and then back this up by describing how its a total scam?

    1. Re:What are you talking about? by Chuck+Messenger · · Score: 1

      Why is it a scam? They claim that you will get $N back if you mail in some form, causing the price to be $N less. Then they go ahead and send you the $N.

      Some people are claiming rebates are a scam because the rebate companies don't actually send you the $N, even when you follow the agreed-upon instructions. If that happened, I'd agree it was a scam. But in my experience, that doesn't happen. Hence, it is not a scam. Apparantly _annoying_ to many people, but not a scam.

    2. Re:What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      describing how its a total scam?

      What he describes is very basic economics. You do everything you can to charge people what they are willing to pay. This is why we have, say, different models of car. Some people will pay $15,000 for a car, some will pay $45,000. Does the second person feel it's a scam that he paid 3x as much? The car didn't cost 3x as much to make.

      Some forms of price discrimination are illegal. Some are perfectly normal. As long as everyone gets their rebates if they mail in for them, there's nothing scam about it.

      What nobody on Slashdot mentions, of course, is that there are a lot of people trying to scam the companies in this situation, too. Remember people who would buy, mail in, and then return, so they get the rebate without making the purchase? They require proof-of-purchase because people will mail in for 2 or 3 rebates on one item.

      There are several things the company gets out of mail in rebates. They get more sales, they get some people who don't claim the rebate, and they get interest on your money for a few weeks. They know that systematically denying rebates will get them dragged into court and will lose way too many customers to make it even a consideration. The only reason they would deny rebates is to prevent fraud against themselves.

      Sorry, my tinfoil hat is at the cleaners.

  102. Less than 30% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your average fulfillment rate? You can tell us, it's in your marketing materials. Less than 30%. Keep up the good work.

  103. I'm going to miss 'em by ohm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the past three years, I've submitted something like 125 rebates. I'll admit that my record-keeping hasn't been flawless, but I bet I'm getting about an 85% hit rate, and for substantial rebates (> $25), I'm getting a 100% rate of return.

    So, I for one will miss rebates. If you're diligent about them (I print out the form as soon as I purchase online, and I fill out the forms as soon after purchasing as I can) you can get some incredible bargains, plain and simple.

    I see them as a subsidy for the non-lazy, borne on the backs of the lazy. It's a tax on other people, I acknowledge, but a tax that redounded to my benefit. Oh well...I guess I'll just have to slow down my electronics purchases. I'm sure the wife won't mind.

  104. Benefit of MIR for self-employed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hey - I dig the MIR. I get things for free or nearly free using it as a tax dodge:

    1) Buy a wifi gateway for $80 and write it off.
    2) Send in the MIR personally and get $50 back tax-free.

    This makes the drive nearly free. The $80 cost me $56 in post-tax dollars because of the deduction (roughly 30%). The MIR gets me $50 of that back in post-tax dollars, so my effective cost for it was $6.

    (Technically, I should have received the rebate as income and taken a hit to make up for it).

    But I agree that they are still a big hassle.

  105. Re:Mail-in skam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I offer to trade them the receipts for 75% of the mail-in rebate's value in cash. None have ever taken me up on it.

    Well, it's a federal crime to do it. Still I think it's a funny idea and a great way to win that argument.

  106. CompUSA is the worst by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

    CompUSA has failed to send more rebates than anywhere else I've shopped, no contest. I stopped shopping there for a while, then bought a PNY video card when the after rebate price was cheaper than Newegg. The rebate processor swears I didn't send in the UPC barcode, even though there's a hole in the box that says I did. CompUSA says it's not their problem, it's PNY's, and PNY doesn't list any way to contact them. So, screw you CompUSA and PNY.

    Best Buy has been pretty good since they started printing out rebate receipts rather than making you hunt down the rebate coupons, but still, very good riddance to the damn things.

    I buy way more stuff via mail order than I otherwise would because of crap like this.

  107. oh i see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they make enough off the protection plans now that they don't need mail in rebates

  108. No Rebates = No Free CD-R's by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    The thing that many seem to be conveniently forgetting is that ending mail in rebates is going to end the ability to get certain items for free after rebate. The talk that they'll just lower the price at the point of purchase is all well and good, but Best Buy is not going to stock enough of an item to be able to give one away to every customer who wants it.

    OfficeMax, for instance, often will have a whole section in their add of items that after rebate you can get entirely free. I've always gotten my rebates back from them. I can't recall the last time I paid for a CD-r. Or for disc cases.

  109. My consumer law by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

    I think it should be illegal to advertise the price after rebates. You must advertise the full price, and if you like you can mention rebates later.

    It seems like a sensible thing to do.

  110. Hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > I would have punched someone in the mouth.

    It is always cute to see a 103 lb, 5'4", 12-year-old bluster with pre-pubescent testosterone.

  111. Time for Circuit City to shine! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

    If Best Buy changes their policies and drops MIRs there's no way they can offer all items for the rebated price. That price depends on a decent percentage of people not claiming their rebates and may often be under cost.

    If someone opens up their weekly pile of flyers and sees BB selling widget X for $190 and Circuit City selling it for $200 - $30 MIR many (including myself) would gladly spend the requisite 5 minutes to save $20 (in a few months). I have a feeling a number of people would be with me on that and the extremely uneducated or unobservant consumer would just see the lower price in CC ad and bite it hook, line, and sinker.

    I like CC stores more and more anyway. They're building a ton of new places that are all clean, decently organized (BB is starting to feel like WalMart), and the people are usually on par with BBs.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    1. Re:Time for Circuit City to shine! by Captain+Chaos · · Score: 1

      The Circuit City by me makes it quite easy to give them your business instead as it is right next door to Best Buy and quite a few people walk between the two comparing prices or checking who has an item in stock. It also makes price matching either store at the other easy as they know you can just walk next door if they give you a hard time. The Circuit City by my sister's house is also very close to Best Buy, directly across the street. Black Friday usually causes that major street to be closed as so many people are going back and forth across it to shop the competition.

      I agree with your comments on the stores themselves, though I find the employees here to be better. Many of the Best Buy employees are rather rude and I can't recall any seeing any Circuit City employees acting that way. Circuit City does have a couple major issues to work out around here at least. My biggest gripe is when you are ready to check out and can't find anyone around to ring up your purchase. That happens much too often and costs them sales as some people after getting tired of waiting set their items down and walk next door. They also need to do a better job of keeping the price stickers current or put in some scanners to check current pricing yourself so you don't have to find or wait for an employee to check the price of items that seem wrong. It would also boost sales since the price in those cases is usually lower and many shoppers I've seen avoid buying since the price shows as higher than next door. Overall though I still enjoy shopping there better than Best Buy and many others I know also try to give them all their business.

  112. Staples! by slashdotmos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Staples EASY rebates are much better than MIR's. That is what probly BEST BUY is planing on doing in 2 years worth of time. Cause I know myself and many other would rather do it online than to mail it in. And so far I have gotten all mine back and in record times. Seems many stores are just tring to play catchup to Staples now. I see something done at staples then lil while latter something real simular shows up at one of the other guys.

  113. idea for regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vendors that provide rebates should be required to include a URL to a web site tabulating the number of customers who were eligible for past rebates (broken out by year of sale), how many actually sent it in, and how many were denied for various reasons (these could be further broken out at the vendor's discretion). And they better be prepared to have their systems audited.

  114. Re:Mail-in sham... It racist too! by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Did anyone ever consider what people without the upfront cash must do? Say I have $50 bucks, and there is a sale of $100 dollar hard drives down to $39.99 with a $60 mail in rebate? I can afford the sale price, but because I don't have the $100 up front, they won't sell it to me. This screws over the lower classes, and is racist, just like if a resturant said, we'll seat you, first give us your credit card and let us have a $500 deposit, to be refunded at the end of your meal. Or a poll tax to vote. The use of money to prohibit people from activities that all should be allowed to do is evil.

    The mail in rebate is also FRAUD, both in advertising and the manufacturer sending the check. I can't count the number of times I looked at a Best Buy advertisment to see some great deal, so I rush to the store to see the price is with a mail in rebate. When I complain, the employee whips out a magnifying glass and tries to show me where in the advertisment is says there is a mail in rebate. And the manufacturers do everything they can to disqualify rebates. They give you short windows of time to send it in. The reason they do this is not so you have less time to send it, but so they can take their time in rejecting you, and then when you want to send it back again, you are out of time.

    I hope the states start suing companies over mail in rebates. It is fraud. It is racist. It is evil. It is like what grocery stores are doing. I saw a flyer for the local grocery store that said "Roast Beef.... $1.99". So I ran there, I love roast beef and was going to buy a pound, and then I see a sign in store that says "Roast Beef.... $1.99 per 4 ounce serving". Son of a bitch!!!

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  115. Good Luck! by timelorde · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's hope they do better than Blockbuster did with that "No more late fees" crap.

  116. Going Postal... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1
    If the Postal Service really didn't deliver as many mails as the rebate companies told me they never received from me, then HALF the mail thet goes into a mailbox would never be delivered!

    Rebate processing centers count on lying to and screwing people by simply not sending out their checks. Frys is well known for this. People who buy their Colunbia walkie talkies will NEVER receive their rebates. NEVER!

    Yet Frys and others still sell their walkie talkies and advertise the rebates, knowing this is true.
  117. They work for me by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've done a quite a few rebates in the past year or two and got virtually all of them. I think i'm missing a $4 one, but all the big ones came through fine (sometimes after the odd phone call).

  118. Be careful what you wish for by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, everyone (myself included) thinks the rebates are a pain, but without them all that means is that Best Buy will be effectively charging you MORE. Do you really think they will lower their prices to match the price-after-rebate that they currently offer? Our local supermarket pulled the same scam - they advertised "new lower prices everyday" ala Wal*Mart, but prices were really higher since they stopped offering shoppers-club discounts. (Example - Slim Fast used to be something like $7 but was discounted to $5 for cardholders every day for over 2 years, so effectively the price was $5. Now, with new "lower" prices, the cost is $6 which technically is lower than $7 but no one ever paid the $7 to begin with)

    1. Re:Be careful what you wish for by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Sure, everyone (myself included) thinks the rebates are a pain, but without them all that means is that Best Buy will be effectively charging you MORE.

      No, they will be charging you slightly more if you ALWAYS sent-in every rebate. They will be charging you much less if you didn't always send them in.

      Do you really think they will lower their prices to match the price-after-rebate that they currently offer?

      No, I think they'll lower their prices by about 50%-75% of the value of the mail-in rebates, making everyone happy. Just look at WalMart's prices, and you'll see exactly what I'm talking about. Instead of a $20 mail-in rebate from Best Buy, you can get the same item for $10 less up-front, with nothing to mail-in.

      Our local supermarket pulled the same scam

      Your local supermarket is not Best Buy, and the comparison is pretty shaky.

      Shopping-clubs are almost like mail-in rebates, and can always get a cheaper price by shopping someplace that doesn't try any scams in the first place.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  119. Two hidden costs of MIRs by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are two hidden costs to mail-in rebates:
    1. Extra sales tax
    2. Lost interest on the rebate

    #1 Sales tax gets charged on the pre-rebated price. It's probably not a big deal in the states where sales taxes are usually lower. Where I live (Ontario if you must) sales tax is %15. From your example this gets charged on the $99. $7.50 more than if it were charged on the $49.99.

    #2 While you wait for your $50 back any interest you could earn on it is lost. Those rebates can take months to come back. %3 cumulative interest on $50 over 4 months (which you can easily earn with a decent savings account) comes to $0.50

    So the cost of the drive from Best Buy comes to $99.99 * 1.15 - 50 + 0.50 = $65.49
    Plus a stamp/envelope/photocopy and the risk of being slimed.

    The extra cost of buying online is shipping charges.

    From my last experience buying a hard disk the same model was at Best Buy and some tiny pc shop nearby. I don't have the exact numbers but the tiny shop had a slightly higher price but no mail-in rebate.

    Currently the Canadian Best Buy flyer has a 120GB Maxtor for:
    $169.99
    - $24 instant rebate (applied post tax, can't confirm)
    - $26 Mail-in Rebate
    ---------------
    $119 ($145.49 after tax)
    ---------------

    The neighborhood hole-in-the-wall shop (Laurier Computer, Ottawa):
    ---------------
    $109 ($125.35 after tax)
    ---------------

    Same specs on both: 120GB 7200RPM ATA-133 8MB by Maxtor. So it's probably the same model.

    1. Re:Two hidden costs of MIRs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      #1 Sales tax gets charged on the pre-rebated price. It's probably not a big deal in the states where sales taxes are usually lower. Where I live (Ontario if you must) sales tax is %15. From your example this gets charged on the $99. $7.50 more than if it were charged on the $49.99.

      Well, most places in the US don't have 15%, they have less then half that rate. Which is less then $3.50.

      The lost intrest is $0.50. Are you really that worried about $0.50? You'd need 10 rebates to lose $5.

      In total, you 'lost' $4.00. Is it really that big a deal that your $50 rebate is more like $46? Especially considering that you know this in advance?

      I tihnk you need to worry about something more than the occasional $4.00 loss on you rebate.

    2. Re:Two hidden costs of MIRs by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to highlight 2 extra costs many people might not consider. This is on top of the obvious disadvantages of MIRs.

      I don't feel like dismissing the $4 just because it's small. It's still a hidden cost and I don't like it.

      I already acknowledged sales tax is probably lower for US residents.

      The 50 cents interest @ %3 is modest. I'm just trying to quantify the cost of loaning money. Would you rather have $50 now or $50.50 4 months from now? Best Buy would know how to extract a higher return while they hold the $50.

      And it could be worth a lot more to you. If you have a credit card balance @ %18 you could put $50 on that and save $3 over 4 months. Now the extra cost on your $50 hard disk is $6.50. You're paying over %10 more than if they'd just sell it for $50 in-store. For irony's sake imagine it was a Best Buy credit card you have the balance on. Then you're actually paying them $3 for the privilage of holding your $50.

      The point is the great prices listed with MIRs are lower than the real cost.

    3. Re:Two hidden costs of MIRs by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      the "hole in the wall" computer shops usually sell OEM hardware.. Is the HDD retail box just as it is at the Best Buy?

    4. Re:Two hidden costs of MIRs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I don't feel like dismissing the $4 just because it's small. It's still a hidden cost and I don't like it.

      Its not hidden; its easily calculated, even by an 8th grader. That one doesn't take the time to consider it is thier own fault.

      And it could be worth a lot more to you. If you have a credit card balance @ %18 you could put $50 on that and save $3 over 4 months. Now the extra cost on your $50 hard disk is $6.50. You're paying over %10 more than if they'd just sell it for $50 in-store. For irony's sake imagine it was a Best Buy credit card you have the balance on. Then you're actually paying them $3 for the privilage of holding your $50.

      Well you could save alot more of 4 months by not buying anything at all and payin off your card. Thats irrelevent. You could just as easily take your rebate check and apply it to you card as well. Don't try to confuse the issue by bringing in irrelevent debt.

      The point is the great prices listed with MIRs are lower than the real cost.

      The price listed is already lower then the real cost, because tax is not included in that cost. Whats your point here?

    5. Re:Two hidden costs of MIRs by magarity · · Score: 1

      Where I live (Ontario if you must) sales tax is %15

      15 percent use tax!?! That's huge! I thought it was bad here in Denver at 8.1 percent. What are your local laymakers thinking and, more importantly, what is the local electorate thinking voting these people into office?

  120. insensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or maybe the poster is pissed off...
    that a person who has made himself a victim of consumerism is continuing the same financial habits that doubtlessly got him in his predicament in the first place.

    Maybe you should stop being such an enabler.

  121. funny phone call to my company by dealcatcher · · Score: 2, Funny

    We received a really funny phone call from a drunk Idaho women that thought she was calling Best Buy. She was having some problems with a best buy in-store rebates. Go here to listen: http://forums.dealcatcher.com/m_316229/mpage_1/key _/tm.htm%23316229

  122. American consumers get screwed by __aaercy5451 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unlike their English counterparts, who have the benefit of a very good Advertising Standards Authority, and their local authority's Trading Standards office, American consumers are left high-and-dry because 'the market' has to be allowed to operate without government interference. The fact that millions of customers get screwed is totally lost on them.

    If KFC advertises a mini chicken sandwich, for example, and it looks much bigger on the poster than it is in real life, the ASA will ban the misleading ad in England. As the whole mail-in rebate scam shows, American consumers get NO protections whatsoever. Welcome to the land of free enterprise.

    1. Re:American consumers get screwed by RexRhino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, we definitly need the U.S. government to make sure those evil corporations don't lie to us.

      For example, lets say an evil corporation decides they want to make money selling insurance. They then charge consumers money. They then take that money and spend it on other things that they want, not investing it or saving it or anything. Their buisness plan is to keep increasing the size of their customer base, and pay off any insurance obligations with the payments they bring in. This is called a "ponzy" scheme, or a pyramid scem. This is concidered fraud and highly illegal and people working for any corporation running such a scheme would find themselves in prison. Except, of course, the largest insurance program in the world, Social Security, is exactly what I described. Funny how the government doesn't do such a good job reporting that kind of fraud.

      Or what, if your local condo board told you that one of the tenants had illegal weapons in their apartment. THey charged you a huge fee so they could send their security people into that apartment, attack anyone who put up a fight, and then kicked out the owner. Turns out later that the condo board knew there was never any illegal weapons in the apartment. Those guys would surely go to jail... unless of course, it is the government doing the invading. Then it isn't an evil corporate thing, it is a great patriotic act.

      How can anyone seriously expect the government to protect consumers from misinformation and scams when governments are the #1 source of misinformation and scams. Has all these years of government-run schools and government regulated media dulled people's critical thinking to the point that they really trust the government to decide what is "truth" and what are "lies". Give a corporation monopoly and a Flag and guns and call it a government, and the people claim to hate corporations are willing to give them absolute control.

      I much rather depend on myself, the internet, recommendations from my friends, and the media, then on the government. Don't take away my right to choose for myself because you all are a bunch of government-worshiping suckers.

  123. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, Circuit City announced today "We've won!"

    So Best Buy eliminates mail-in rebates, meaning they don't get the margin of income for those who are attracted to their low rebate prices and then never send in the rebate, while Circuit City continues to advertise rebates as if its their real price.

    Best Buy has to have something in mind to replace that % of their income. Are all of their rebates now going to be best buy gift cards?

    Plus, how many rebates are manufacturer rebates? Best Buy can't eliminate them. Come to think of it, I don't recall the last item I bought where the mail-in rebate was actually from Best Buy- most I've dealt with were manufacturer rebates.

  124. FUCK THE IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - i love rebates! i claim FULL cost of the item, then pocket the cash back...

    - SO FUCK THE IRS AND PAYING ANY TAXES

  125. you're goddamned right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - you betcha! i love MIRs because i can write shit off and claim full cost!

    - and just think: there are idiots out there that think it's OK to pay taxes! stupid shit-for-brains!

  126. This isn't good. by Larenzor · · Score: 1

    Huzzah for no rebate forms! No more waiting for my money! Good riddance to jobs...?

    This is a great thing for Joe Average, Super Consumer. No longer will he not get his rebate because he failed to read the instructions on the form. No longer will his rebates need to be processed by someone. No longer will he need to call someone to complain about his missing money.

    I used to work for Best Buy's rebate call center. Sure, these things were a pain to us trying to deal with as much as they were for the customers. The problem is that if the rebates are removed so are a large number of jobs. The call center is located in my hometown, it's far from a sprawling metropolis and I know for a fact that the loss of Best Buy's business is going to be significant. A lot of good people are going to be out on the street within this 24 month period simply because people can't be bothered to fill out their address once or twice and toss it in the mail.

    1. Re:This isn't good. by the+narf · · Score: 1
      I think rebates are an utter abomination, and it's well nigh about time that they disappear from the American shopping landscape.

      Rebates are a useless, costly, and pathetic replacement for a good old-fashioned SALE. Remember what those were? An unconditional discounted price for a limited period of time. It wasn't an "instant rebate". It was a sale price. Until the 1990s, this was the standard way retail stores ran promotions. It was simple and straightforward. You'd go to the store, buy the items on sale, and that was it. No forms to fill out. No hassles. No "forgotten" submissions. No crap.

      And no need to pay sales tax on the pre-rebate cost of the product, either. Since the retail price was discounted, the sales tax levied was less. Yes, you don't get distortions in the system like the people who end up paying negative cost for an item (because all the rebates add up to more than the purchase price), but you get a fairer system. Instead of a few people getting ludicrously large (eventual) discounts because they buy an item and jump through all the rebate hoops, everyone who buys the item gets a smaller (but immediate and more equitably distributed) discount.

      While I understand that the people in the rebate call centers will likely lose their jobs, they'll more likely than not find others. The needs of the many millions of consumers who shouldn't have to put up with rebates vastly outweighs the needs of the few who will be temporarily displaced when the (un-needed) call centers close. The same thing happened when the buggy-whip manufacturers all went out of business due to the increasing popularity of the automobile back in the early 20th century.

      And as for those supermarket shopping clubs -- the way THEY work is very simple. The supermarket raises the average margin on all their goods by an extra percent or two, and then deeply discounts a (small) number of items to attract people to the store. Frankly, it's a way for the market to increase its margins at the expense of people who think they're getting a deal. It's all about increasing repeat business.

  127. RE: Best Buy and rewards program, etc. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Well, if B.B. wasn't honoring your rewards program, you definitely should give them a call and look into it. But honestly. I've had their "rewards club" thing for the last year now, and practically every month, I get at least a $5 credit coupon in the mail from points I earned on misc. purchases.

    (In fact, I originally became a rewards member only because I bought a big-screen TV from them and it was worth enough "points" on the program that I got more than double the money in credits back that the program cost to sign up for it at the time of the TV purchase. I ended up using that $50 or so in rewards credits to get a leather laptop carrying case I wanted for about $5 total.)

    I will say, though, Best Buy has been going in the wrong direction recently. The changes to the rewards program (mail-in rebates issues by B.B. themselves subtract from the credits you earn in the program, for example!), make them look less attractive to shop at. And maybe it's just the stores around here, but I never really see those "red tag" type specials on a discount table like I used to? That used to be the #1 best reason to drop by Best Buy and look around. You could get some truly good deals on returned/opened box products on the discount tables or scattered around the shelves. But now, they seem like they try their best not to ever put something like that out - and if they do, the "discount" sucks... Like it'll be missing power adapters, manuals, cables, and everything, and will only be 10% off.

  128. This is meaningless... by Jack+Johnson · · Score: 1
    A replacement scam will be ready by the time this comes to pass. Some hybrid of service plans and megastore membership fees I imagine.

    I'm actually amazed there are enough unconnected/extremely impatient people aroung to keep these stores afloat as is. In my experience, buying online + overnight shipping (17 hour purchase to delivery window) cheaper once the item prices goes over $100 while two-day shipping is cheaper across the board.

    It boggles my mind that people continue to pay a 40% retail markup for anything more expensive than a DVD.

  129. Why Rebates? by Tired_of_it · · Score: 1

    "So, why don't you call the number on the rebate form? You know, the one that you kept a copy of, along with copies of the UPC and receipt? I've done several thousand dollars of rebates over the last three years and I have never not received them in the end. On a few, I did need to call in when the turnaround date passed without a check. That's why it is really important to keep copies of everything you send in as well as the appropriate due dates for each." And how much time,energy, and cost have you spent in doing so? And how much time, energy, and cost does the retailer spend in processing the rebate (if they actually do at all). Save that cost and give the consumer an even BETTER price! From a business cost standpoint, the whole idea is ridiculious. Just give the customer the savings at the point of sale and be done with it. From a customer satisfaction standpoint it is frustrating and equally ridiculious. The only rebate progam I have ever used was an instant dealer rebate on the purchase of an automobile. I simply will not deal with "mail-ins".

    1. Re:Why Rebates? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      From a business cost standpoint, the idea is FUCKING GREAT!! I forget what the exact statistic is, but a good percentage of cattle don't even mail in the rebate form. Add that to the hassle and faulty rules, and they're making a killing.

  130. It's not double taxation by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

    It's being taxed more than you effectively paid on the purchase. I agree it's dumb that they advertise a price, yet you pay a higher price as well as the taxes upon that. Rebates are stupid.

  131. Easy to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently in the process of using it to submit a rebate, and I am not finding it "Fast, quick and easy to use."

    What I did the fist time I vised their stapleseasyrebates.com site.

    Clicked "submit an easy rebate offer"
    Clicked option "bought in store."
    Entered the both of the required info.
    Found out through experimenting that you don't need the "-" in "your rebate offer number."
    Hit next, in firefox get a default layout screen with no info(might be my adblock filters).
    Tried IE, got though to a screen asking if I had any more to add.
    There is no indication as to what you do to or any option to "check out."

    So after some looking I stumbled across a screen that allowed me to set up an account.

    To get this I went through the Find a rebate" route, I submit the number, then my info, and then get to the "print out your forms" screen. Apparently if you do it this way the last option is "mail in rebate information" and not "submit you rebate online."

    Huh, I thought that the point of the "stapleseasyrebates.com" was for easy entering and processing, and not having to mail anything. Apparently I registered my rebate online, but I had no choice to chose "submit online" and I still have to mail in my rebate info.

    I logged in to check the status of my submission in the "online rebate" part which didn't work(no surprise), so then I tried the "mail in rebate," and in there is the following:
    "We have not yet received the mail-in portion of your rebate; please allow 21 days from the mail-date for the rebate to be entered into our system."

    I went to their FAQ and the only thing I could find was this:
    "Why are some rebates not eligible for online submission?
    At this time we are excluding most software primarily because most are upgrader rebates and we can not incorporate the verification requirements on-line at this time."
    ETC.

    Funny, it says on the receipt to apply online, and it give no indication that it has to be mailed in manually. Why bother with the online submission when I still am going to have to mail stuff?

    So I have emailed their tech support, asking WTF is up with their system and my "easy" rebate submission. I have no problem if I am at fault here, but given how their system is setup(i.e. no option to check my submission out or continue) I doubt this is the case.

    If this problem doesn't get resolved I am going to report it to the BBB.

  132. But we can already see your ways isn't happening by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    You claim they want to advertise lower prices, but this just isn't happening. As I said, they got rid of all the "free after rebate" stuff they used to use to bring in customers long ago. Gone are the free CDRs, mice, keyboards, CD lable kits, CD cases, even CDRW drives that used to be free after rebate. But have they been replaced by any "loss leaders" that are just free or even very low cost (just a few dollars) that they could continue to advertise? NO! If they were going to do this they would already be doing this, considering all the free-after-rebate items that they have stopped giving out in the past two years. Instead these bargans that were frequent a few years ago have simply stopped (with the one exceptopn that I've noted of occasional very low cost cordless phones after rebate), and no other cost savings to the customer has replaced them.

    You may rejoice that all of the rebate deals are ending. And I certainly didn't like waiting to get my money back or paying extra sales tax that I would never get back. But don't lie and say that now we'll get those deals up front at the register when there is absolutely no indication of that and no reason to believe it. If you want to say "I was too lazy to send in for the rebate and I'm glad that no one else will be able to get a rebate either now", that would be honest and I could believe it. But don't do Best Buys job of telling lies that now prices will be lower when we've alread seen that that isn't happening.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  133. Re:April fools day is over by mkldev · · Score: 1
    Top 100 April Fool's Day Hoaxes of all Time: #73: The Origin of April Fool's Day
    Associated Press ran story that Tony Blair was courting Margaret Thatcher

    I'm sure there are plenty more where those came from.

    --
    120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  134. Crap Buy, not Best Buy by wshwe · · Score: 1

    Crap Buy has terrible customer service. It's no wonder many of their customers have rebate problems. Why will it take 2 years for Crap Buy to eliminate rebates? They should be able to make the switch in less than 6 months.

  135. I'm surprised Attorneys General haven't acted by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the abuse that consumers suffer with these rebates (some of which I can attest to personally), I'm surprised the Attorneys General from the various states haven't targeted the companies offering them. At a minimum, I'd expect them to go after unclaimed rebates using the government's power of escheat. There must be a ton of money left that goes unclaimed, and states are hungry for revenue all the time. Or, they could levy fines against companies who falsely claim all the rules weren't followed (I've had 3 of those myself, and I have absolute proof that I fulfilled every niggling requirement. They still denied them, claiming there was no UPC in my submission. Lying bastards. I have a photocopy of what I turned in, and the original UPC is right there taped to their stinking form.)

  136. HDD retail box by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

    Probably not retail. That would explain the undercut, which suprised me I admit.

  137. Negative image doesn't matter by rainmayun · · Score: 1

    It's well known that customer service isn't the primary factor in consumer choice. The biggest factor is price... as long as a store offers the cheapest goods, they can treat their customers like camel dung and the customers will keep coming back. Oh sure, they'll complain, but they will return. Plenty of examples to support this, Best Buy being just one of the worst.

  138. 1 in 14 people get the rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stats according to a Best Buy manager. That's a nice piece of change.

  139. I Cleared $2,368 Rebates Last Year by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I cleared nearly $2500 of rebates last year, and only have one or two outstanding that have yet to be cleared up (probably with a quick letter to the local AG). The key is to be creative, tenacious, and to track everything. A program like Rebate! Rebate! helps a lot, but you can accomplish the same things with a PIM or spreadsheet. It also tells me that I only spent around $200 more than I received in rebates. Finally, FatWallet rules.

    --

    Da Blog
  140. Most Hated Marketing Ploy by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    "Can it be that we're finally nearing the end of one of the most hated marketing ploys of all?"

    Do you mean promise something a couple years in the future and then never deliver?

  141. LOL by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0

    I meant the people.

  142. Your point? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Doesn't sound that bad.

  143. Mod Parent Down/Grand Parent UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy simply said, that someone who uses Best Buys Stock symbol, has likely a bias due to possible investments. He didn't get into the Math or even approach it on that level.

    Ahh, what has slashdot become. Where you can so easily use the Jedi mind fuck on the mods.

  144. When did I buy last at BB or CC? by unclocked · · Score: 1

    I am wondering when was the last time I bought stuff at BB or CC. It appears, it was during last november when people line up at 3:00 AM, I think it's some thanksgiving or something though I dn't remember who I was thanking. And, the deal I got that time wasnt the best anyways.

    As much as I have hated, I wonder if we can really do without retailers. Is it possible, even in the internet times, to do away with retailers altogether? For (somewhat) geeks like me, it may be possible, but what about folks who are just stepping into digital age, like my neighbor who bought a 5 year old apple (against my advice)? Can he possibly do without BB or CC?

  145. Re:But we can already see your ways isn't happenin by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    All I'd be happy about is if/when they couldnt/didnt advertise a price lower than that which they actually require someone to fork over to leave the store with the item.

  146. How to make rebates work FOR you. by tokabola · · Score: 1

    I used to work at Office Max, and they had the rebate game going on also. The secret to getting the upper hand in that game is paying attention.

    Most of the time there is a "substitute" item in case they run out of the item advertised. Ussually this "substitute" is made by a different manufacturer, and therefore the rebate won't apply. So what you do is check to see if there is a substitute. Hope they run out of the advertised item (they usually do) and then purchase the sub. Since it's not eligable for the refund, they simply sell it at the reduced price.

    I got a $149 DVD burner for $59 cash, and instead of a Mad Dog (never heard of them before) I got a Pacific Digital (actually a Lite On), so I got an even better product without having to fill out forms and wait.

    Obvously this won't always work, they may not run out of the original item, or have a substitute, but I've done this quite a few times at several retailers including Best Buy, Comp USA, and Circuit City.

    Tommy

    --
    Open Source for Open Minds
  147. It's Just An Expensive Survey by beejay54 · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's the price point that the manufacturers are after in this case. Any good MBA can see that rebates are a good way to get excellent market research on your product. It's been a challenge in recent years to get this data. In Canada stores use tactics like the HBC Card (like an air miles card) or the Shoppers Optimum Card. Basically its a card that lets you collect points on the things you buy to redeem for free stuff, etc. As everyone knows it's just simply so that manufacturers can see who is buying their product, and that is worth a lot of money to big business.

    --

    -- Bored? Check out my Portfolio
  148. PROFIT! by Mean+Ass+Troll · · Score: 1

    1 Buy crap at best buy 2 Mail in Rebate 3 Get $$$$ 4 Return crap 5 Profit! wonder if there are any people doing this on a large scale? or if the real reason is that legislation would eventually come out banning it anyway?

  149. Washington Mutual by muhan · · Score: 1

    Absolutely free checking accounts for business or personal. No deposit requirements, no minimum balances, no strings.

    1. Re:Washington Mutual by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      Absolutely free checking accounts for business or personal. No deposit requirements, no minimum balances, no strings.
      • And I get about 12 phishing attacks a week supposedly from Washington Mutual. I report them for their benefit but have yet to receive even a single automated reply of "thanks, we're looking into it". Coincedence? Maybe, but combined I'd never trust my money to WAMU.
      • I should point out, most other banks/companies send back an automated reply including information on phishing attacks in general and what you should do if you did submit information to the fake site. WAMU fails to do this, that's not a very good business practice.

  150. 2 words by rkrabath · · Score: 1

    socialized medicine

    --
    Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
  151. Refunding cash transactions... by Deven · · Score: 1

    I agree, the situation is ridiculous.

    If you paid cash (or if you've paid by a check which has cleared), you deserve to be refunded in cash, and the retailer should make every effort to do so. How many $20 bills does a Best Buy store receive in a day? They shouldn't have to give you their stock of $1/$5/$10 bills, which they need for making change, but they don't need tons of $20 bills, nor the occasional $50 and $100 bills they get. If they don't have enough cash at the customer service counter, they can collect larger bills from the cashiers.

    If there really isn't enough cash available to refund your money, they should offer to give you what cash they can and a check (on the spot, not weeks later in the mail) for the difference. Or they can offer to have the full cash refund available the next business day when you return for it.

    This has nothing to do with whether or not one ought to have a checking account. (For the record, I have several.) This is about sleazy refund policies by a huge corporation who wants to take advantage of the "float" of keeping your money for a couple months longer than they deserve to.

    Meanwhile, people with checking accounts who dare to try to take advantage of just a day or two of "float" are now going to start getting burned by checks being cashed instantly, now that Check 21 is the law -- even though the bank will still put a 2-5 day hold on any check you deposit! Why is it that individuals who take advantage of "float" are viewed as trying to cheat the system, yet the system itself is allowed to do the same and worse, and everyone turns a blind eye to it?

    --

    Deven

    "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  152. How did I lie? by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0

    And why would I lie about not reading a article? The only reason I know it was a joke was because of user comments. I usually read user comments first before reading the article. Most the time I find user comments more interesting than the article it self.

    Wait, why the hell am I defending my self. If you don't have any thing nice to say than just fuck off!

  153. I also work for rebate fulfillment company by dandrayan · · Score: 1

    I work for the largest rebate fulfillment processor in the US (GFS/Young America) in our Tempe, AZ office. I can't speak officially for our company, but I can give you the facts based on my 1 1/2 years of working for my employer.

    I back up the other person who works for one of our competitors. Lots of thought, effort, and programming time goes into every offer we handle to ensure that every qualifying consumer will get their promised rebate in a timely matter. We don't make the rebates, we only process them as the client requests us to and some are more strict than others in their requirements. Make sure you read over what the offer is requiring you to submit and if you have any questions then call up the customer service number beforehand to clarify anything. If you don't receive your rebate in time or it is not what you were expecting, then you need to call our customer service.

    As much negative press that companies get about rebates, people don't know that they're usually getting the better end of the deal. I've seen lots of offer change requests come across my desk from the clients requesting to extend submission deadlines, allowing photocopies of submission materials, and lots of other additional changes that weren't on the original offer form. In other words, they're actually helping you and trying to make sure that *more* of you will qualify for your rebate.

    Personally, I hate rebates and will highly prefer any product without a MIR over one that does. I know I wouldn't have a job if rebates didn't exist, but I still don't like them. I admit that lots of advertising is misleading since the post-rebate price is the one prominently advertised... sorry to break it to you, but the company is in business to make money and low prices attract consumers. If Best Buy gets lots of complaints about rebates then it's their own fault for the misleading advertising, but it's also the fault of the consumer for not being smart or observant enough to read the fine print below the sales price that shows the price breakdown.

    In short, a large part of the industry *is* really trying hard to make sure rebates are easier and more fair for everyone. It would definitely hurt us and our clients if Best Buy did try this, but ultimately it is up to the individual manufacturers whether or not they will keep doing rebates or not. Lots of the larger companies like SanDisk, Hewlett-Packard/Compaq, and Linksys get a lot of their rebate submissions from Best Buy stores, but there are lots of other stores like CompUSA, Fry's Electronics, and Circuit City that sell their products as well. The stores can ask the manufacturers to stop rebates, but they can't force them stop. I doubt rebates will completely go away, but rather will continue to change and evolve into something similar to the Staples EasyRebates program.