And the rest will do what they need to do to get by.
And there is no reason to think that it will be legal. For example, sell drugs to your kids or take your cheap beachfront property at gunpoint.
And when there is no work to be done, what do you propose all those people should do ?
Starve, commit crimes, revolt. Unless the rest of us provide a way for them to make a reasonable living without being employed.
This will happen. It doesn't matter whether you like it.
Trouble is, those statistics that you quote are based on reported income, not actual income. The two are very different, which is the whole fucking point of this article.
And yes, many of the tricks used to hide wealth are legal. The point is, they shouldn't be.
I've personally seen and done things which require explanation as the rational explanation doesn't work, but I've got no interest in going to him to see what's going on. I'm not interested in it.
Terrified of him bursting your fantasy bubble, aren't you?
That's funny, because those four rights are specifically about "I want to live but want to make sure I have no responsibility to let the next generation live".
None of which has anything to do with the central fact of this case, namely that:
Anyone who engages in behaviour that could be considered foolhardy or reckless in nature is 100% responsible for the outcome.
Not 90%, not 99%, but 100%.
So is holding a cup of steaming coffee between your legs foolhardy or reckless? I certainly think so.
This means that MacDonald's was not in any way culpable, and the "facts" that you state are entirely irrelevant to this case.
You know what pisses me off?
To dial long distance, I have to dial "1-" first (which is OK, since I don't want to call LD by accident). But if I do dial "1-" and then a number that isn't long distance, it says "BEE-BEE-BEEP Your call can not be put through as dialed. Please dial again."
Knowing what is long distance and what isn't is very complicated around here.
If I start the number with "1-" it means "I don't care if the number is long distance". If I don't care that the number is long distance, I certainly won't care if it isn't.
So annoying.
Slashdot Mirror
What I don't get is why is hacking so damn easy?
Why would any computer with sensitive information on it be connected to the internet?
I talked to a guy in India. He asked me a couple of simple questions, dictated an access code to me, and that was it. His English was excellent.
And the rest will do what they need to do to get by.
And there is no reason to think that it will be legal. For example, sell drugs to your kids or take your cheap beachfront property at gunpoint.
Starve, commit crimes, revolt.
Unless the rest of us provide a way for them to make a reasonable living without being employed.
This will happen. It doesn't matter whether you like it.
No, but you are in the zone for the hated stupid.
And by the way, Obfuscant, no one has every chosen a more appropriate user name.
Investing in your own country's businesses is fine. Investing in foreign tax shelters isn't.
Trouble is, those statistics that you quote are based on reported income, not actual income. The two are very different, which is the whole fucking point of this article.
And yes, many of the tricks used to hide wealth are legal. The point is, they shouldn't be.
Well, if you have a specific criticism of Ranki's methods, let's hear it. Otherwise STFU.
Fools gotta be fooled.
Terrified of him bursting your fantasy bubble, aren't you?
Does it have electrolytes?
I hope they would be. That was 13 years ago.
Fuck you.
Only in America. Civilized countries don't allow this.
So everybody else is Catholic? I didn't know that.
Well, you certainly were. And still are.
What laws of God prohibit female clergy, but are OK with pedophillia?
What in the hell are you talking about?
And goatse was my father, you insensitive clod!
On the internet!
Anyone who engages in behaviour that could be considered foolhardy or reckless in nature is 100% responsible for the outcome.
Not 90%, not 99%, but 100%.
So is holding a cup of steaming coffee between your legs foolhardy or reckless? I certainly think so.
This means that MacDonald's was not in any way culpable, and the "facts" that you state are entirely irrelevant to this case.
You know what pisses me off?
To dial long distance, I have to dial "1-" first (which is OK, since I don't want to call LD by accident). But if I do dial "1-" and then a number that isn't long distance,
it says "BEE-BEE-BEEP Your call can not be put through as dialed. Please dial again."
Knowing what is long distance and what isn't is very complicated around here. If I start the number with "1-" it means "I don't care if the number is long distance".
If I don't care that the number is long distance, I certainly won't care if it isn't.
So annoying.
He didn't say "algorithms that run only on Windows", he said "apps that run only on windows".
Reminds me of the Person of Interest machine.
If one perfeclty replicated a brain simulation would it be sentient?
1. Nobody knows.
2. Nobody ever will know.
Sucks to be a pedant who can't spell. Must sting.