Slashdot Mirror


It's 2013, and Windows Activation Is Still Frustrating

Deathspawner writes "There's little that's more frustrating than being a legal customer and getting screwed over by the company you're supporting. If there's a perfect example of this, it's with Microsoft's OS and its millions of customers that have had to ring its tech support lines for activation help. Recently, a Techgage writer got bit by an issue with Windows 8 — caused by Microsoft itself — and wasn't even able to call to fix it. Microsoft has two problems to solve here: it needs online chat support (like most large companies in 2013) and it definitely needs an activation system that doesn't make things difficult for its legal customers on a too-regular basis."

435 comments

  1. Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is probably finally the year for it.

    Now, let me go off and spend the next two hours installing the java plugin for Firefox on my Ubuntu box.

    1. Re:Linux on the Desktop by synapse7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably faster than installing the java plugin in the metro ie.

    2. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can sense PC-BSD will be the dying desktop OS according to Netcraft this year.

    3. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    4. Re:Linux on the Desktop by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on.. they have more developers than I have. Can't I have the dying BSD desktop project this year?

    5. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Spacelem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2003 was the year of Linux on the Desktop for me. Has been ever since too.

    6. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Just, using your package manager, install icedtea-7-plugin. Or, if you preffer, at the command line: sudo apt-get install icedtea-7-plugin. Now try do the same using the new win8 store.

    7. Re:Linux on the Desktop by fisted · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. There's no way your cheap lunix-ripoff could possibly die twice anyway.

    8. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, I installed it while responding to you from a metro browser.

    9. Re:Linux on the Desktop by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      Amen to that. A long time ago I tried to set up a Runescape box for a friend. It was a P4 with 1GB of RAM but it screamed on Ubuntu. It took around 2-3 hours to install Java though. All those command line file paths I had to type manually because they didn't implement a root login or UI options to "run as root." Ugh, I'd rather talk to Microsoft tech support.

    10. Re:Linux on the Desktop by slashmydots · · Score: 0, Troll

      I only care about uninstall speed. I remove it from every system that comes into my shop unless someone uses it. So far, nobody uses it.

    11. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1, Funny

      What the hell is wrong with you? The Java plugin is the last thing you'd want to install anywhere...

      Its like trying to find a way to run visual basic scripts on Linux.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    12. Re:Linux on the Desktop by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Why?

      As a primarily Java developer... I ask the same question.

      Why?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now go to another PC, logon and have your applications install. MS have followed the route of making this work, Linux follows a per PC model. Apples and Oranges.

    14. Re:Linux on the Desktop by laffer1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It got better.

    15. Re:Linux on the Desktop by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Brother, can you spare a dime?

    16. Re:Linux on the Desktop by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Linux is just a kernel.

      Puppet is easy to use for that, so is keeping bins on NFS, there are lots of other ways to skin this cat. Microsoft did not invent nor perfect this.

    17. Re:Linux on the Desktop by h4rr4r · · Score: 1, Informative

      You could has just set a password for the root user.

      Your ignorance is not someone else's fault.

    18. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at home.

    19. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me too. Since that was the only year I used Linux for my desktop.

      I returned to Windows after that. I have installed (and used) Linux on who knows how many servers since 1997 till today though.

    20. Re:Linux on the Desktop by kenh · · Score: 1

      It was a P4 with 1GB of RAM but it screamed on Ubuntu.

      My friend, you and I have different definitions of what it means for a computer to be "screaming"...

      --
      Ken
    21. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those command line file paths I had to type manually because they didn't implement a root login or UI options to "run as root."

      Uh... what? I take it you haven't heard of sudo or gksudo?

    22. Re:Linux on the Desktop by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

      I know you were kidding but installing java plugin under ubuntu is just a matter of apt-get install icedtea-7-plugin ;-)

    23. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    24. Re:Linux on the Desktop by citylivin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "So far, nobody uses it"

      Java or metro?

      Because if its java you are at the best unknowledgable. Users generally don't have a clue that java is what they use to communicate with their office over a remote access appliance. However they do know that they took their computer to "some guy" and now they can't connect to their work network anymore and I have to clean up the mess you made.

      Please only fix what is actually broken on a customers machine and don't put your own personal biases of what is "necessary" software into the equation. You obviously don't know what users do, and even THEY do not even know what they do or need.
      You should at least know THAT!

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    25. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2003 will always be the year of Linux on the Desktop .

    26. Re:Linux on the Desktop by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Brother, can you spare a dime?

      Sure, if you don't mind the California Red-Hair variety.

    27. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, Slashdot.org is infested with Linux fanboys who can't seem to take off those sunglasses.

      I've been with Linux (since .99 kernel) back in the days of VAX, X11 Diamond card woes, and all those floppies from tsx-11.mit.edu downloads. You know the days of real manual kernel installs no Slackware CDs.... you kids have no idea how good you got it. Still today it still can't shake off its hacker tendencies to be the default OS for users. In other words, you still have to have to be technically inclined to maintain it. Redhat for all its political incorrectness is the only flavor today (at least I see) that mainstream IT would use because it works within the IT framework of release and updates. -- Sure your girlfriend can use it to surf, do her homework assignment, but maintaining and installing it is still way more work that windows. Its still a geekfest OS.

      I see great fault in the pervasive Linux culture of "this is how you install it, just do make; make dep; make clean, oh and you will need these glibcc++ files upgraded too and you might have to add douchbag.libc file too". -- All you asshole programmers who force folks to use a make file to install your shit because of your lazy show off ass are all part of the problem. Worry too much about screenshots. If you make a program, I better be able to click it as a package update. Sure a lot of stuff in 2013 is... but a lot is not. and that is not is what causes the problems.

      An there are the deniers who say "yeah but its pretty easy if you..." -- if you've spent a good part of your time to learn Linux thoroughly that it makes it easy. That is the point it shouldn't be that way for it to be mainstream.

      Redhat has tried for years to work on the mundane things. Like easier to install and maintain, standardize things. and people got pissed that it contrived things for them. They were angry that instead of playing on pet projects "see what cool button it did" instead of fixing bugs. How many programmers prioritized features over bugs and ease of install. -- Most.

      The weird thing is Linux fans want it to be mainstream OS, but at the same time could care less if it was easier for everyone else to adopt it. I enjoy using Linux for years, but I just don't see it as the mainstream OS. Engineering and CS absolutely, everyone else, get a clue.

    28. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Don't tease everybody, its the middle of the week still!

    29. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo apt-get install ubuntu-restricted-extras

      You must have slow internet, because that took about 5 minutes on this end

    30. Re:Linux on the Desktop by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      It was 2006 for me, although I started getting interested in Linux, learning and doing my original distro-hopping back around 2004 (still primarily using Windows at the time). All of my files were moved onto Linux partitions and Windows was completely eliminated by late 2006. In fact, the last year before the complete switch, my system was set to dual-boot both Windows XP and SUSE (or Zenwalk?), and I found myself primarily on the Linux side, rarely booting into Windows and never for more than a few minutes. Computing's been good ever since.

    31. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem. You can use Windows while remaining ignorant. You can't use Linux and be ignorant. Computer users, the vast majority of them, would prefer to remain ignorant have crap just work for them without having to learn anything new outside what they absolutely have to.

    32. Re:Linux on the Desktop by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      So you spent the last ten years looking at the cool Linux screen savers?

    33. Re:Linux on the Desktop by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What kind of tech are you? Removing shit without A) a problem. Or B) without getting permission to do so. You just don't go around willy-nilly deleting shit on customers computers just because you disagree with it. Especially without permission. Even if they are clueless. I have seen screwed up systems in which I told customers - this is the problem - you should get rid of this - or upgrade this - or you shouldn't do this... but at the end of the day it's up to them.
      I had a customer with 3 virus scanners installed and running at once, causing major slowdowns and strangeness. I could not convince him that was a bad idea. But he insisted to leave them installed. So I did. If they say no - it's no. I never do anything without discussing it with the customer first..

    34. Re:Linux on the Desktop by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I know you were kidding but installing java plugin under ubuntu is just a matter of apt-get install icedtea-7-plugin ;-)

      Actually it's not. It's also all the knowledge that must be gained to get to that point as well.

      On Windows, it's as simple as, "This program/website requires Java, click here.". On the Mac, it's even simpler.

      This is both the main strength and main weakness of Linux, and why it will never be the Year of Linux on the Desktop until something like Ubuntu succeeds in hiding the complexity of Linux from the user.

    35. Re:Linux on the Desktop by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You cannot use windows and be ignorant, I wish I could. They don't even have bash or ssh.

      You learn a different work flow, but still have to learn something.

    36. Re:Linux on the Desktop by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      This! Regardless of any service industry, communication with the customer is first and foremost important. Understand their problem and/or request prior to implementing a solution. Keeping them in the loop is the best thing you can do out of respect for the customer and sanity of the person performing the work (mitigates finger pointing too).

      FYI, communication to customer is still billable time as consultation so long as you're providing them "value". Only you and the client can quantify that however.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    37. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a CentOS instead?

    38. Re:Linux on the Desktop by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations Desktop User #379!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    39. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is intuitive and just works. Linux is a bunch of hacks stacked on hacks.

    40. Re:Linux on the Desktop by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 2

      In most distros it's "open GUI package manager, type password, search for 'java', pick the one that says 'java plug-in', hit 'apply.' -- using the commandline hasn't been required in at least a few years... That GUI method is no more difficult to learn than the method for installing it on Windows or OS X, and for some users like my mother, it's a lot easier as it means they don't need to know where to download the item from, which file to get, where it should be saved on the computer, remember where they did save it, or what the filename is.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    41. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably finally the year for it.

      Now, let me go off and spend the next two hours installing the java plugin for Firefox on my Ubuntu box.

      In 2006, this was challenging. Now, it isn't.

    42. Re:Linux on the Desktop by node+3 · · Score: 0

      In most distros it's "open GUI package manager, type password, search for 'java', pick the one that says 'java plug-in', hit 'apply.'

      Again, information most people don't have. On Windows, it's "click here to download Java" and on the Mac, it's a dialog box that pops up asking if you want to install it, and OS X takes care of the rest.

      using the commandline hasn't been required in at least a few years...

      Broadly speaking, that is quite simply not true. But in terms of installing software from apt repositories, that's true. But not all distros have GUI repository software installed by default, and not all distros even use binary repositories. But more to the point, I was responding to the claim that a command line option was so much easier than doing it on Windows.

      That GUI method is no more difficult to learn than the method for installing it on Windows or OS X

      Absolutely false, sorry.

      and for some users like my mother, it's a lot easier as it means they don't need to know where to download the item from, which file to get, where it should be saved on the computer, remember where they did save it, or what the filename is.

      Fortunately, on Windows and the Mac, no one deals directly with the file anymore, it's all handled by the OS (on the Mac), and reasonably automated on Windows.

      This is the same, lame, argument Linux proponents have been making for over a decade now, and it's no more true today than it was back then. Linux is not easier to use than Windows or OS X. The fact that Linux has such a paltry market share should clue you in to that.

      And I like Linux. A lot. I can run it far better than I can run a Windows box (and I'm good with Windows as well). There are only a handful of things it does more easily for me than OS X does.

    43. Re: Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many devices are powered by Linux and most people don't realise.... Phone/tablet, games, media centres etc, etc.
      Look what google did with Linux and java.

    44. Re:Linux on the Desktop by Spacelem · · Score: 1

      So you spent the last ten years looking at the cool Linux screen savers?

      No, the usual stuff: playing Minecraft, watching DVDs and other videos (we don't have a TV), spending ages on the Internet, and catching up on work. My wife uses it for those things too (except she prefers Plants vs Zombies to Minecraft).

  2. Not for pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, activation codes are all over YouTube depending on your motherboard manufacturer.

  3. Dreamspark etc. by matthiasvegh · · Score: 2

    As a university student, my uni grants access to MS products like Windows, Visual Studio etc. It really was a matter of entering a serial and that was all that had to be done. I take it off the shelf windows activates more obtusely?

    1. Re:Dreamspark etc. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a university student, my uni grants access to MS products like Windows, Visual Studio etc. It really was a matter of entering a serial and that was all that had to be done. I take it off the shelf windows activates more obtusely?

      If memory serves, Windows phones home some data about the platform it finds itself on when it is activated(I don't know if it is particularly identifiable, or just a hash of whatever seems likely to be system specific, or somewhere in between), and some versions can be very unhappy if they come to the conclusion that they've previously been activated on different hardware. Enough time on the phone will get you a nice guy in India who will probably be able to fix it for you; but it definitely can happen.

    2. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Gerafin · · Score: 1

      It's generally just 'enter a serial number' for off-the-shelf versions as well. Microsoft will run all the checks in the background, and as long as everything goes smoothly you won't notice a thing. The problem is, the system they use for validating serials is a convoluted mess that quite often fails at some point during activation. It can also revoke your activation if you swap out a bunch of hardware at once, to name just one example.

    3. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its obtuse only if you have paid for it. For the pirates, the activation is included in the ISO

    4. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Stolpskott · · Score: 1

      As a university student, my uni grants access to MS products like Windows, Visual Studio etc. It really was a matter of entering a serial and that was all that had to be done. I take it off the shelf windows activates more obtusely?

      Basically, yes. For Enterprise/Volume/Educational institution licences, there is a fairly basic serial number activation process to allow the mass-rollout of desktops from a central publishing server like SCCM. That means your IT department will not mutiny over having activation problems on 15% of your workstations after rolling out a new installation to 10,000 desks.
      For the one-off retail items, either in terms of OEM or boxed product, the activation hassles lie with the end user (i.e. one individual... not much direct revenue to M$) even though the OEMs probably roll out the same installation image to a similar number of workstations as the mass-rollout IT crowd. Of course, the end user can call the OEM's support line to bitch about it, but unless the OEM's support line is a premium rate number that is generating revenue just by having know-nothing users being guided through activation by know-almost-nothing Tier 1 support, then the OEM will say "Activation problems... sorry, go talk to Microsoft. Our contract states that we provide hardware support only..."

    5. Re:Dreamspark etc. by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never had to talk to a guy in India, I've always gotten an automated phone system. You read the key, it processes for a second then gives you a long-ass number to put in. It's a nuisance but less horrible than issues we've had with Adobe software activation.

    6. Re:Dreamspark etc. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's not even talk about Adobe. Everything about their customer interaction process, whether it be downloads, activations, even getting them to take your damn money, appears to be cobbled together from a mixture of coldfusion from the mid 90's and a bitter, gnawing, hatred of all that exists, older than the primordial Void itself. All wrapped up in a ghastly AIR UI, naturally.

    7. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Its obtuse only if you have paid for it. For the pirates, the activation is included in the ISO

      ...along with a root kit.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    8. Re:Dreamspark etc. by firex726 · · Score: 1

      I remember they revoked my W7 serial one day out of the blue.

      Had been using it for like two years with no prob, then one day it tells me I need to activate it. Kinda odd seeing as I bought it direct from MS via their online store. After a phone call they issued me a new serial.

    9. Re:Dreamspark etc. by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Add activation for students on top of that and you have the perfect nightmare. I went through that with my copy of Lightroom. *shudder*

    10. Re:Dreamspark etc. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, serves you right for installing a new video card.

      What business does someone have opening the case? It should violate DMCA to use a non OEM hard drive.

    11. Re:Dreamspark etc. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I've had to do that several times. 4 out of 5 times, the automated system refers me to the nice Indian man for a short Q&A session before giving me the activation key.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Dreamspark etc. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Boot Ubuntu Studio (if you're not already savvy) and give Darktable a try.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Dreamspark etc. by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      A keygen probably found it and it had started activating in large numbers. It happens.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the big corporate installs, such as at a large university, there is a local server on the network that does the activation. Hardware reporting isn't really an issue in that case. No one can activate that isn't already on their lan, so pirating of their site license key isn't much of an issue.

    15. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still more convenient than using the genuine shit. As long as the root kit doesn't take up too many CPU cycles I'm fine with it.

    16. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got the automated system, read it the insanely long key, then was told it was invalid. I then talked to a guy in India, read the insanely long key again, and received my activation number. The system is VERY broken. It made me regret buying Windows instead of pirating it.

    17. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    18. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry, but Darktable does not come close to Lightroom for workflow management or ease of use. Sure it is fine for converting a couple of raw files, but if you want to convert a wedding shoot it takes way too long.

      I have better luck with Lightroom in a Windows 7 VM (on Virtual Box with Direct 3D drivers installed) than I have with any other software. I would love to have an alternative, but I have found nothing yet.

    19. Re:Dreamspark etc. by edrawr · · Score: 1

      That is not always the case. I worked for a university and we only used MAK licenses for production, KMS was too much of a PITA to deal with.

      --
      Sauer
    20. Re:Dreamspark etc. by kenh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Retail Windows OS can be re-installed up to three times before you need to manually activate the product.

      As I understand it, the activation process creates a system profile "hash", and ties it to the product key. When your system changes in a significant way (MB, CPU or NIC) it can trigger a re-activation.

      People that rebuiild their systems frequently are familiar with this problem.

      --
      Ken
    21. Re:Dreamspark etc. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Most OEM reinstall media has the product activation key "baked in" - Dells, for example, embed a code in the BIOS and the install media detects the presence of the code in the BIOS, bypassing activation hassels...

      --
      Ken
    22. Re:Dreamspark etc. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Did you try googling your product key? It might have become the new "magic" product key for "free" Win 7 installs...

      --
      Ken
    23. Re:Dreamspark etc. by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      This happened to me around christmas time when I bought windows 8 (download from Microsoft) to upgrade Windows 7 Home edition (premium, not OEM). Ended up chatting to a guy in India who said that it couldn't be fixed until after the new year, because everyone was currently on holiday. The only thing he could do for me was to refund my money, and so I'm back on windows 7.

    24. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't one. The idiots who pay for software just like telling themselves that so they'll feel better about their stupidity.

    25. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Broadband · · Score: 2

      I had a W7 system I activated with no hardware changes whatsoever. The only exception was I unlocked my X3 AMD to an X4 with no issues. Realised the only problem the 4th CPU had was terrible physics in Borderlands 2...limbs would randomly twitch. I turned the lock back on and that single change in my CPU required reactivation. Annoying, but I didn't have to call in.

    26. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may get one anyway. Better start off with a good one that'll take out the others.

    27. Re:Dreamspark etc. by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      I have some HPs that don't have it. It makes the computer useless for troubleshooting hardware. If I plug in a second hard drive for testing the Windows Activation pops up.

    28. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ie because of Microsoft's overbearing response to a few pirates, they almost lost a paying customer (they have lost others). Whereas they never gain the pirates as customers.

    29. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your use case that you request the activation code, and immediately use it? No wonder that it works, the server serves brand new codes that don't have any burden behind them like some other use cases might have.

    30. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 device limit. Then you go through the phone thing, it doesn't work, and you have to read it again to Ishmael in india.

    31. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      No, that comes standard with Windows these days.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    32. Re: Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are on Linux, try Aftershot for raw workflow. It's workflow is better than Lightrooms.

    33. Re:Dreamspark etc. by spire3661 · · Score: 0

      It is a long standing rule that any OS you find on a pirate site is assumed to be pre-rooted.

      --
      Good-bye
    34. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      It is also common knowledge that computers run on magic smoke and that witches float on water. A 'long standing rule' is hardly citation. Please show examples of OS releases from the high-profile release groups have been found to contain a rootkit.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    35. Re:Dreamspark etc. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The problem is not the high profile groups, but people who repack. I for one, have no way of ensuring i get a release from a proper group. Just because someone slaps a scene name on something doesnt mean its safe or trustworthy.

      --
      Good-bye
    36. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      It's pretty bad. You go to install Windows XP. Which edition do you have?
      Home OEM?
      Home Retail?
      MCE 2005?
      MCE?
      Pro?
      Was it made by Dell? Those codes don't work anymore with the other ISOs (at least the ones I have saved), not even the OEM version.
      Of course, there is Vista and 7, but which edition? Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Family Pack or Pro? Are these OEM versions or retail versions? Which OEM?
      All I really need to know is: Ubuntu Desktop or CentOS Server? (Though, I like Slitaz for my thumb drive bootups.)

    37. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      I for one, have no way of ensuring i get a release from a proper group.

      For someone who's posting on /. and doesn't know what hashing is for, well I guess I should just pity you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    38. Re:Dreamspark etc. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Strange, as it lets me do my work on one image and then easily apply it to the whole roll.

      Sounds like you just didn't spend 5 minutes of time learning how to work it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    39. Re:Dreamspark etc. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I dont have deep 'scene' information to get a proper hash and check against it. How do i know the hash is legitimate?

      --
      Good-bye
    40. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Aug+Leopold · · Score: 1

      Its obtuse only if you have paid for it. For the pirates, the activation is included in the ISO

      ...along with a root kit.

      If you happen to be particularly clever, you look for images that come from MSDN. All it takes is a quick hash comparison to the subscriber downloads database and you can verify your image is unaltered. In most cases that is still easier than activating windows.

    41. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd, it is now becoming a tired old horse-trick of bringing in the mandatory reference to a 'nice guy in india' every time tech support is mentioned.

    42. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Microsoft posts hashes for all of their ISO's on their website via technet. The "scene" is useful when MS pulls a "we're going to charge you $9.99 for a disc" BS.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    43. Re:Dreamspark etc. by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      I talked to a guy in India. He asked me a couple of simple questions, dictated an access code to me, and that was it. His English was excellent.

    44. Re:Dreamspark etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're stupid enough to grab the first download you come across, instead of looking for crackers you trust, or who're trusted by someone you trust.

      (Yes, I realize a large proportion of the people using pirated Windows probably *are* that stupid.)

    45. Re:Dreamspark etc. by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Best post ever

    46. Re:Dreamspark etc. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      And I suppose the ones from Microsoft are the ISOs that have the activation cracked?

  4. It shouldn't use activation at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no benefit WHATSOEVER for the customer, and it's not even made the product cheaper. All it's managed to do is piss of just about everyone, probably including the poor bastards in tech support in Microsoft.

    1. Re:It shouldn't use activation at all. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's no benefit WHATSOEVER for the customer, and it's not even made the product cheaper. All it's managed to do is piss of just about everyone, probably including the poor bastards in tech support in Microsoft.

      It certainly doesn't do the customer any good(and it's extra annoying on the IT side: "C'mon Microsoft, we practically have to use a truck line to transport all the money we send you every year, we keep our licensing data squeaky clean, and we still have to dick around with activation every time we push a system image to a thousand workstations? Fuck you."); but I assume that MS didn't like the good old days when everybody who ran windows and gave a damn had a nice copy of Win2k Enterprise, VLK, sometimes with 'do not make illegal copies of this disk' scrawled in sharpie on the illegal disk copy for amusement's sake....

    2. Re:It shouldn't use activation at all. by number17 · · Score: 1

      Imaging thousands of workstations and not using a KMS server? Sounds like you are doing it wrong.

    3. Re:It shouldn't use activation at all. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      It says "do not make 'illegal' copies." This does not mean that making a copy is illegal, only a reminder to not make illegal ones.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:It shouldn't use activation at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you never heard of a KMS server (which is actually just a service running on very low ressource usage).
      It's even better then VL, because you don't even have to remember a key to type in, and magic! Everything is activated all the time and running ..

  5. What do you mean, frustrating? by Nbrevu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, surely megaupload was closed, but there are hundreds of different file hosting services where you can download RemoveWAT from.

    1. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by alexo · · Score: 1

      The problem is, how can you trust it (or other "solutions") to be free from malware?

    2. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windoze is malware, so you're already fucked there.

    3. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "The problem is, how can you trust it (or other "solutions") to be free from malware?"

      Yes. That is the problem with Windows regardless of where you get it from. I'll go one step further and say that you can just assume it already has malware. Windows Genuine Disadvantage anyone?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same way you can trust MS with their software. Closed software is closed software, no difference. Actually, hacker groups sometimes release sources while MS never does.

    5. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't; it's closed-source.

    6. Re:What do you mean, frustrating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can trust it about as much as any other executable file on the Internet; that is, you don't. Scan it, you imbecile; that's as good as it gets.

  6. Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Mac OS X, just don't go for gnu/linux (this is not the gnu/linux desktop year)... Maybe someday we will have a Android for desktop that will be safer for us in the industry.

    1. Re:Mac OS X by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      Ok, explain to my grandmother how to get her beloved accept-no-substitutes ten year old greeting card software to work on OS X.

    2. Re:Mac OS X by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      My mom, also a grandmother, still uses an OS9 machine next to but not networked into her OS X laptop.

      I've been stockpiling parts so I should be able to keep it running for at least 20 more years. (B.t.w. I have 33 year old arcade machines that are still running fine)

      Sometimes there's no reason to upgrade.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    3. Re:Mac OS X by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Enable Boot Camp. Freaking newbies.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    4. Re:Mac OS X by Merk42 · · Score: 2

      Then you're back to square one with regards to activation, except now you've spent hundreds of dollars on new hardware too.

    5. Re:Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got about a 50/50 chance she'll love iPhoto the first time you show it to her. Otherwise, just don't update her computer ever.

    6. Re:Mac OS X by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Wineskin makes running Windows apps pretty easy on OS X. I've accidentally double-clicked EXE files on my Mac and was shocked when I remembered that I had that installed, because the EXE just worked.

    7. Re: Mac OS X by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My 33 MHz Quadra 650 is still running. I keep it around as it runs an Agfa tabloid printer. And some cool Bungie games.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re: Mac OS X by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Arggggh! Agfa Tabloid Scanner. Coffee, brew faster!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Mac OS X by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      MacOS makes you register before you can use it.

      It's not as buggy as Microsoft's activation but it's the same kind of nonsense.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Mac OS X by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The same goes for if you use vmware or virtualbox instead of duel booting. You still have to maintain the copy of Windows.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Mac OS X by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. Just hit Command-Q at the registration screen. You get a Skip button.

    12. Re:Mac OS X by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Duel booting? I guess that's one way of looking at it.

      "I don't think that word means what you think it means" actually fits here....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Mac OS X by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      On top of having to overpay to buy a Mac (for whatever reason, I guess the screens are nice?) you then want to turn around and pay more money for a windows license to put on a Mac?

      Do you honestly advocate this? Do people let you near their computers??

    14. Re:Mac OS X by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You can also just enter crap information.
      I have "registered" many a Mac as:
      Joe Blow
      123 4St
      Somewhere, BC
      (604) 234 5678

      It has bee awhile, but by telling it the correct province, it got the timezone right, and it did at least some sanity checking on the phone number. I think the area code was checked as well.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  7. "needs chat support (like most large companies)" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Google's chat support? I'm still looking for it.

    And no a message board of users is not "chat support"

  8. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Google's chat support? I'm still looking for it.

    And no a message board of users is not "chat support"

    Or Apple chat support?

  9. No Good Solution by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most complex solution that most paying users will be happy with will be something like what we haven't had since Windows 2000 (and all versions before that). Which was a simple key that you enter to install the software. The same key could be used on every system, and it didn't really do anything for protecting against piracy. Pirates are going to pirate, regardless of what kind of system gets put in place to stop them. Any system that is good enough to stop even a few people from pirating is inevitably going to annoy quite a few paying users. The only thing that's really going to stop people from pirating is lowering prices for home users. It's the exact reason I got Windows 8. At only $40 I finally felt they were asking a fair price. Asking home users to spend 50%-100% of the cost of the hardware on the operating system for their computer seems to be more than most people are willing to pay. People who buy computers from large manufacturers already pay a license. Most of the individuals who are pirating are those who have built their own systems. Give them the operating system for a price comparable to what they large computer builders would pay, and you'll see piracy drop a lot.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:No Good Solution by trout007 · · Score: 1

      I tried to get MS to take my money. I had 4 machines with XP or Vista on them. But for some reason it wouldn't let me download a copy of Windows 8 64 bit to a machine I had running XP. Told me I had to buy a disk. Oh well. Still running XP.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    2. Re:No Good Solution by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Where the heck do you see it for $40? I would agree that it is a fair price, if the thing wasn't universally reviled, but I have not even seen the useless upgrade edition for under $90. The thing that drives people to pirate is that when Microsoft saw Windows 8 was becoming a bust, they jack UP the price of Win7. I dont care if it is the OEM's are driving the price hikes ore not. The customer is just going to believe that the OEMs ans Microsoft are in on the scam together. (and they are) I know there were retailers charging extra to install WinXP back in the days when Vista was released for the same reason.

      And before someone out there in shill-land gives me a sob story over hardware compatibility and testing... I ain't buying it. The PC OEMs do not give a moment's thought to it, it is all up to the device vendors to release compatible drivers. And they will release drivers for as long as an operating system remains popular.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:No Good Solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's nonsense that there is no good solution. It's simple; you don't implement DRM at the OS level. Since people will warez it whether you try to prevent them or not, as you say, you don't try to prevent them. It's less hassle for you, less hassle for your customers, and it's more likely that if they ever get into a purchasing position that they'll recommend your operating system since they won't be pissed off at you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:No Good Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you upgraded before Jan 31 it was $40 for the upgrade version. I took advantage of that (I am running Linux primarily, but have a Windows partition for games). I would not have bought an upgrade / OEM version at $100-ish, though... that is getting a bit too high for a gaming partition (for me; I am not a heavy gamer).

    5. Re:No Good Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had that as a special price in Target, Walmart, etc that expired on Dec 31 2012.
      It was for all versions, even the non-upgrade ones.

    6. Re:No Good Solution by DrGamez · · Score: 2

      When it was released, one of the big selling points were that it was super cheap, $40 for the upgrade.

    7. Re:No Good Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asking home users to spend 50%-100% of the cost of the hardware on the operating system for their computer seems to be more than most people are willing to pay.

      You're too kind to the thieves at Microsoft It's more like asking home users to spend 50%-100% of the cost of the hardware on the operating system for their computer is fucking highway robbery, especially considering how shoddy Windows is and always has been.

      It's far less useable than kubuntu; MS seems to go out of their way to piss off its users. It's less stable, has fewer features... I cannot for the life of me figure out why anyone would pay for a boxed set of Windows for a newly-built PC when Linux is far, far superior in every way and costs absolutely nothing (well, I can see gamers buying it).

      Windows doesn't have a single feature Linux lacks and lacks many Linux has. Kids, if you're building a new PC and it isn't a gaming rig, save your money. The better OS is free of charge, a simple download and a 20 minute easy, painless install away.

      Oh, there's no activation with Linux and no Patch Tuesday and no reboots when you do patch Linux. IMO only fools and gamers buy boxed sets of Windows.

    8. Re:No Good Solution by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Any system, even just entering a code will annoy legitimate users... Most users never had to put up with that because they didnt perform the install themselves.
      Nothing will prevent pirates, you can download cracked versions of windows where all the activation bullshit and code entering requirements are removed... Infact, you often get bundles which include a lot of additional software that you would have had to install by hand afterwards...
      Some of the pirated versions of windows are starting to approach linux in terms of default usability and ease of install. The non pirated versions are still stuck in the dark ages.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  10. Re:Dump Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given what you predict hasn't come to pass, perhaps you should go back and revisit your assumptions.

  11. Just ditch the activation. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It doesn't do a thing to stop pirates anyway, so what's the point of it?

    1. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Funny

      It doesn't do a thing to stop pirates anyway, so what's the point of it?

      Whatever do you mean? Windows 8 has been Microsoft's most effective anti-piracy scheme ever. Not that they meant it to be, but still...

    2. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Was Windows 8 just a pirated Ubuntu "Unity" or is Unity a pirated Windows?

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    3. Re:Just ditch the activation. by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's funny because every illegal copy I've seen come into my shop is virus infested because it's missing basically all updates and at least 1 major service pack. No crack has a long useable life and never touching Windows Update is beyond stupid from a security standpoint. Then people like me refuse to work on it so you can never get your illegal PC serviced anywhere. So good luck with your half-working crack disaster.

    4. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Unity isn't that bad. I mean, not to the point that it could be confused with Windows 8, at least.

    5. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, considering my copy of Win7 is cracked, has been installed for a few years and is fully updated. Granted, most people can't be bothered to find a decent cracked version, but they do exist. Come to think of it, I've installed that copy on a few dozen computers and they're all running great and having no issues with updating at all.

    6. Re:Just ditch the activation. by computererds · · Score: 2

      I'm to lazy today to cite sources this morning, but there have been hash and certificate schemes that have worked on post-XP versions from day one.

    7. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As equally as i can say the people in the shop can also install root kits and viruses. Anyways if you need someone to fix your PC... you shouldn't even be copying software illegally.

    8. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 OEM "crack" runs before boot, fakes the BIOS OEM key, and then unloads itself. All updates and service packs are installable. The updates (that aren't checked by default) that supposedly patch activation holes also do not thwart this method of "cracking." To do so would invalidate all OEM copies.

      I think you are an idiot.

    9. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the cracked windows installs that didn't end up in your shop?

    10. Re: Just ditch the activation. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      What exactly do the updates protect me from? Please note, my.computer is firewalled and I don't use internet explorer (the one update I'd think is high priority).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:Just ditch the activation. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      They did one better and put out Windows RT. Man is it hard to find a working ISO for that.

      Arguably, they've had some success with piracy before all this activation thing. Microsoft Bob wasn't very popular with the pirates, IIRC.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    12. Re: Just ditch the activation. by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me.

    13. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you misunderstand Microsoft. Ballmer has a huge load of stock in the companies that make Valium and Prozak, which is why Microsoft does everything in their power to enrage their users!

      Witness Vista, Bob, Clippy, Windows 8, Access, product activation...

    14. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      My experience of people who installed a cracked version of windows which subsequently ceased working, is that they will just go back and get an updated cracked version... There are plenty of small shops who will provide that sort of under the counter service, and a short usable life of a crack is good because it keeps the users coming back.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    15. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 encourages the hell out of piracy -- it encourages people to pirate Windows 7.

    16. Re:Just ditch the activation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who have to take their PC's to the shop to be fixed probably don't know what they are doing when they try to pirate windows. Windows 7 has been reliably cracked since a couple of months after release.

    17. Re:Just ditch the activation. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Hey, Unity doesn't have activation. That automatically makes it better than Windows.

  12. There's little that's more frustrating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "There's little that's more frustrating than being a legal customer and getting screwed over by the company you're supporting."

    Try watching the FBI warning for 10 seconds when you LEGALLY buy DVDs.

    1. Re: There's little that's more frustrating... by Brucelet · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      When I stick a dvd in my computer and hit "play with vlc" I never seem to have this problem

  13. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by jamesh · · Score: 1

    Where's Google's chat support? I'm still looking for it.

    And no a message board of users is not "chat support"

    I do pretty much all my HP warranty/service calls via online chat. Much easier than trying to deal with accents and delays. Ditto for a lot of other providers.

    I don't know about google... i've never needed their support on anything

  14. What about getting drivers from Windows Update ? by darkz0r · · Score: 1

    Personally I am still waiting for the day when Windows Update will be able to recognize drivers and install & update them. Its 2013 and as a IT Support am still googling for hardware ID's! Most of the times driveridentifier.com gets me a hint of what that unknown HW is, and drivermagician is NOT up to par any longer!

  15. its 2013 by nimbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and Windows Activation Is Still Relevant?
    seriously, its your own damn fault. If you're too lazy to use over 50 different flavours of BSD or Linux then i dont know how else to make personal computing work for you other than pay the mac store to make the bad time go away, or put up with steve as he pedals microsoft into the ground.

    im sorry that sounded angry but its just frustrating to see these posts on slashdot when we all know about the alternatives. BSD, Linux, this is shit that has a core of dedicated developers who actually give a damn about your security and user experience. BSD has some of the best documentation around, and Linux has entire festivals and conferences that seriously want to help you do this. the game argument is practically irrelevant too; we have portal halflife and minecraft to name a few.
    just, please, help us help you.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:its 2013 by CastrTroy · · Score: 0

      What's more frustrating than Windows activation is finding the right hardware mix that will work well with you Linux/BSD distribution of choice. I using Linux in VirtualBox for a lot of things and thought it was great. Tried to install it as the bare OS on my laptop and it was an exercise in frustration. There are certain configurations that will work flawlessly, but finding the exact hardware you need to get everything working smoothly can be very time consuming, and it doesn't help when you already have hardware and want to switch after the fact.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Maybe a decade ago...
      Today, I can't think of a single piece of hardware that doesn't work very well under Linux.

    3. Re:its 2013 by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      seriously, its your own damn fault.

      Yeah - I guess it's my fault for needing Photoshop, Solidworks, AutoCAD, Excel, Word, etc. to share files with my customers.

      --
      Place nail here >+
    4. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ten years ago it was common to have installation problems with Linux. I know, I was determined to become familiar with it and had a lot of headaches. But in the last five years especially, every version of Linux I tried - OpenSUSE, Fedora, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Aptosid - installed correctly on the first try. I'm sorry if you've had worse luck.

      This is how I recommend trying it:

      1. Back up your data to something external to the computer so that no matter what happens, you can't ruin your personal files.

      2. If you want to run both Linux and Windows on the bare hardware, you have to install Windows first.

      3. Put a Linux image on a burnable DVD or on a USB thumb drive, boot from that, and make sure all of your hardware works correctly (display, keyboard, mouse, speakers, networking, etc...) If it doesn't work, you can either search the web for help or skip that Linux distribution entirely and try another one.

      4. Once you find something that works, install it. If you want to keep a Windows partition, make sure you read your documentation on the installer to make sure you understand how to partition properly, so you don't overwrite your Windows partition.

      I have three different Linux distributions installed plus Windows 8 (I have to support Windows 8 at work). I did installation the easy way: put one hard drive in the computer, install Windows. Take that drive out, put other drives in, and install Linux on them. Then put the Windows 8 drive back, and the next time I ran a software update on Linux the boot loader configuration process automatically detected Windows and added it to the options available when I start the computer.

      Again, I'm sorry you've had bad luck. I hope it goes better in the future, if you want to try again. Or alternately, you can just run Linux entirely from a USB thumb drive. I imagine with USB 3 and a decent drive it would be pretty quick, too.

    5. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more frustrating than Windows activation is finding the right hardware mix that will work well with you Linux/BSD distribution of choice. I using Linux in VirtualBox for a lot of things and thought it was great. Tried to install it as the bare OS on my laptop and it was an exercise in frustration. There are certain configurations that will work flawlessly, but finding the exact hardware you need to get everything working smoothly can be very time consuming, and it doesn't help when you already have hardware and want to switch after the fact.

      Here's a hint, if the device has the letters w-i-n in it, it won't work on anything but a Windows box. E.g., WinMouse. But that's only a guideline. If your hardware is too old, then it won't work anywhere.

      What I find incredibly frustrating is that even with the "right" hardware, Windows can't install the correct driver unless it tries three times. Are people always willing to spend six hours configuring their Windows machine? Then there's the 30 minutes to find out where they put the switch to allow you to display file extensions because heaven forbid I tell the difference between myapp.ini and myapp.exe without looking at pictures. Another 30 minutes to discover how to set up Explorer to display file the way you want.

      Windows is the perfect example of a Harrison Bergeron world. Bring everything down to the lowest denominator. The sad part is that there are windows "administrators" who thrive in this world.

    6. Re:its 2013 by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Its 2013 and there is still over 50 different flavours of BSD/Linux.. Each with its own complications.. No wonder we still aren't at the year of Linux.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    7. Re:its 2013 by slashmydots · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Please, come back to reality. You're making open source software users look like idiots again. Here we need to run an app that only runs on Windows. That is not uncommon. The end. Calling me lazy just proves how ignorant you are.

    8. Re:its 2013 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      My main hurt about not using Linux as a main OS is that the stupid Flash is not hardware-accelerated. Even YouTube often is still unable to deliver some video in HTML5.

    9. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youve no idea what you're on about. fuck off.

    10. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is not an alternative to Windows in all use cases. It annoys me that people think it is.

      Who the heck cares that Linux has Half Life, Portal or Minecraft? In your world it might matter, but not in the world where someone NEEDS Windows-only software or Windows-only peripherals, and can't change that software due to something like business requirements.

    11. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and Windows Activation Is Still Relevant?

      seriously, its your own damn fault. If you're too lazy to use over 50 different flavours of BSD or Linux then i dont know how else to make personal computing work for you other than pay the mac store to make the bad time go away, or put up with steve as he pedals microsoft into the ground. .

      holy crap you can't be that retarded.

      a large large LARGE percentage of the world HAVE to use windows.
      I for instance do video editing and must use a windows pc period, I couldn't do 10% of my work at home or on the job with anything other than windows.
      I'm a mcse and a linux guy. I love linux, but so many programs are M$ exclusive. you comment makes no sense

    12. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Graphics cards in laptops. Even 'fully supported' brands.

    13. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty strong argument that most idealistic posters totally ignore. Unless you get paid in GPL monopoly money, you have to give the customers what they want, or they will leave you for a business that will. If other readers could grasp that it's about business and getting paid - not about fuzzy ideals; life would be better.

    14. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My desktop has issues with dual monitors and Nvidia hardware on Linux. The monitors are two different sizes, resolutions, and ages. The video card is a GTX550 Ti variant; I've tried many different software/driver combinations to try and make it work as it should. Every combination I tried has some kind of slightly different vsync problem- the most annoying being one where the primary monitor wants to be 60 hz, and the secondary one 59.9 hz, and the vsync only triggering on the second- producing a tear line that moves down my screen at 1/10 of a Hz on the main monitor!

      I want to run Linux as my primary OS enough that I am purchasing a System76 built machine when they next update their hardware with Intel's new processor offerings this summer.

    15. Re:its 2013 by elashish14 · · Score: 0

      In fact, it most certainly is your fault. Have you heard of this man named Mohandas Gandhi? Something, something like "be the change you want to see in the world?" If you don't like using Windows (and I have no reason to believe this is the case, because you haven't explicitly stated so, but let's assume it is so for the sake of the argument, as there are many users in a similar boat) because you have to use those technologies, then you only have yourself to blame for not doing something about it. As for me, I've been using Linux since 2007, OpenOffice/Libreoffice and GIMP all the way, and have never once thought of going back. It hasn't been perfect, but it's far closer to perfection than going back to Windows could ever be.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    16. Re:its 2013 by wadeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh I've tried running Linux as a novice multiple times over the years. Everytime it's a nightmare of googling and forum posts that get arrogant replies and an unwelcome community.

      It's a disjointed mess (Linux) that never "just works". There's always issues with hardware compatibility or issues that honestly I don't get or see as someone who maintains thousands of desktops running Windows.

      This is my own experience though and this is Apples to Oranges I understand in terms of the hardware side. But the community is horrible and you need to realise it's your type of attitude that makes it that - Apple aren't stupid enough to attack MS by bagging out Windows (well sort of - they attacked the usability through the "I'm a Mac" videos but not the product), they provide a VERY good alternative that people use and people jump. Linux fanboys have this idea that by attacking Windows it will make people move to Linux?? How about you make a product deserving of people making the switch and the people will do it themselves.

    17. Re:its 2013 by staalmannen · · Score: 1

      I would have agreed sometime before 2007 but after that I must say that stuff works amazingly good with Linux. Usually the out-of-the-box experience of Linux is far better than a fresh raw install of Windows with regards to drivers (OEM preinstalls not counted). Looking back, I can't even imagine how much time I spent searching for the relevant drivers for Windows, and in such an insecure way: to go to a homepage and download an installer from there (guessing that the web page is legit). To be fair, the last version of Windows I used was Xp back in 2006 or so... Things might have improved since then.

    18. Re:its 2013 by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      How about graphics cards.

    19. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So install Crossover or Virtualbox for your Windows Only app.

    20. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well, if you have portal and minecraft, I can see why the game argument is irrelevant...

      *eyeroll*

    21. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, it's the customers fault. you have to match customer expectation, or you end up being that terrible company that tries to tell its customers what they want. you give the customers what they want. thats how businesses work. until the customer wants non-MS office documents (a better argument would have been that open source alternatives are getting pretty good at outputting compatible file formats, but whatever), a business should give them ms office documents. that's how businesses work. give customers what they want. you can't force feed them what they don't. you'll find you'll fail extremely quickly.

    22. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pretty words by famous people do not make a paycheck. Spend some time in a place called "the enterprise" where proprietary software, such as Crystal Reports, Visual Studio, MSSQL, and the like are deeply ingrained in the network, and tell me your open source applications will suffice. Are you saying it's *my fault* that this happened? If so, fuck you. In some places, Windows is in fact a necessity.

    23. Re:its 2013 by Anubis+IV · · Score: 0

      With the exception of Solidworks, every single one of those is available for Mac, and from what I can gather, it appears that there are alternatives available for that one as well.

      Of course, you could also go the Linux route and use LibreOffice and the like, as well as the various CAD alternatives available on that platform.

      So, yes, it is your own fault for denying that there are viable alternatives available for what you want to do.

    24. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what Crystal Reports is, but even on Windows if you thought using Visual Studio and MSSQL was a good idea, then, yeah, your problems are at least partially your own fault.

    25. Re:its 2013 by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      My sony touchpad doesn't work on linux out of the box. Its one of those touchpads where the entire thing is a button and depending on where you click (esp on the bottom part), its a right or left click.

    26. Re:its 2013 by dywolf · · Score: 1

      similar to my own first thoughts, though i was mroe along the line of ... this clueless guy has a tech site?

      why in hell did he wait to activate it? thats like the first thing you do upon installation. That...or cracking it.
      And if he wasnt going to activate it, why didnt he disable the nag screen (hides it til windows deactivates itself)?

      >> "Because I find it silly in this day and age to call tech support and A) Riddle off your credentials, B) Riddle off your 25 character product key and C) Listen to someone riddle off a 25 character key back, "

      Um, the activation phone line is automated now, and has been. Sure, you can talk to a person. But why would you when pressing the buttons on your phone is quicker? And assuming you have a smartphon, you do have an app to match the letter to numbers, right? I mean, that would be the geek thing to do. (and the really geeky thing to do would be to have them memorized)

      >> "I opted to seek out cracks to solve my issues rather than do the “legal” thing. Two cracks later, I got nowhere. Perhaps they work for some people, but they didn’t for me."

      PLBTKAC

      For a supposed "geek site" the guy seems awfully clueless.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    27. Re:its 2013 by dywolf · · Score: 1

      short version:
      "Tech" site i've never heard of seeks click revenue from being slashdot by bashing microsoft.
      News at 11.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    28. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he does. Poor little butthurt FOSS zealot! Go kill yourself.

    29. Re:its 2013 by dywolf · · Score: 1

      and, if he apparently had access to the internet...which he supposedly does referring to downloading cracks and googling the problem...why didnt he use the internet activation like any sane person would do?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    30. Re:its 2013 by dywolf · · Score: 1

      oh look. every page on that "tech" site auto refreshes every 30 seconds or so, to get even more ad impressions is my guess. (a front page is one thing, but there's no other reason for an article to refresh like that)

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    31. Re:its 2013 by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I understand not being able to use Linux, but a Mac with an older version of FCP would work just great. No need for Windows.

    32. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not thinking hard enough then. Every single graphics vendor has multiple lines of hardware that don't work well under Linux.

    33. Re:its 2013 by Zimluura · · Score: 1

      ...pay the mac store to make the bad time go away...

      an advertisment for cosmetics? just kidding, i'm sure we all know what you mean.

      ...the game argument is practically irrelevant too; we have portal halflife and minecraft to name a few.

      the game argument is still valid, it's certainly the only reason i keep a windows system around. hopefully with more kickstarter games coming out for linux (and drm-free too) i'll be able to ditch windows entirely in the future.

    34. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is your fault for choosing such a lame bussines.

    35. Re:its 2013 by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      seriously, its your own damn fault. If you're too lazy to use over 50 different flavours of BSD or Linux

      How stupid of me for wanting to use software rather than spending hours trying to get it to work on Linux, and having to repeat the process when some update breaks all the work I did.

      Like, oh I dont know, an Exchange mail client, Ventrilo, any of the most popular games (except WoW which has had stellar support), my G15 keyboard, my blackberry...

      I managed to get basically all of that working (except a decent Exchange client) in Ubuntu 8.04. Then some updates happened, and WoW, G15, and Ventrilo all broke. Several hours later theyre all working, except Ventrilo.

      I must be crazy stupid for getting pissed off and moving back to my free student copy of Win7, but for whatever reason my frustration level dropped significantly. Of course its back up with Win8, but at least I only have ONE wonky window manager to deal with rather than the FotM WMs that are floating around the Linux desktop world.

      Even with W

    36. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are being called lazy because you are victimizing yourself. You believe you need to run an app that you believe only runs on Windows. Chances are you have not even investigated the possibility of alternatives, possibly because you still subscribe to the falsehood that Windows somehow can do things that other OSes can't (the only case I know of is defragmenting; Windows is the only OS that must be defragmented regularly or be prepared to reinstall from scratch when the system inevitably becomes unusably slow).

    37. Re: its 2013 by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      Because using VirtualBox for that one piece of software is so hard?

    38. Re:its 2013 by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The design stuff works better on a MAC - Which runs Unix

      Office documents work just fine in LibreOffice

      The real issue is real business software which is Windows Only ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    39. Re:its 2013 by thoth · · Score: 1

      So install Crossover or Virtualbox for your Windows Only app.

      Crossover may not work well enough, and VirtualBox still requires a Windows install/license for the VM it is hosting.

    40. Re:its 2013 by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Go and buy an Android phone - Runs Linux

      Your Broadband in the UK almost certainly runs via a WiFi router - Runs Linux

      Your Sky+ box runs Linux ...you are probably running Linux on many devices and are not aware of it ....because it "just works"

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    41. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you think any of that stuff on the wiki list actually is as good as an Autodesk program then you aren't an actual user and just used your google-fu to try and be all condescending. You're saying the same thing when someone says GIMP is just as good as PS. Maybe if you're just cropping and filtering some lolcat pics but everyone knows professional workshops have judged it and found it wanting. Same with any of the Linux CAD/CAM software. There is a reason Autodesk rules CAD and it doesn't have to be some kind of conspiracy. Their software is just better and does things no one else does.

    42. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know my nvidia 560 Ti works perfectly under linux with those nvidia drivers...

      so if it doesn't work on one linux, try another one....

    43. Re:its 2013 by nimbius · · Score: 1

      for cad:
      qcad, creo, sketchup, freecad, draftsight, brlcad, gcad, archimedes, and pythoncad.

      for pretty pictures:
      libre office, gimp, crita, cinepaint, and pixen

      for word and excel, libreoffice.

      for finite element analysis (assuming youre an engineer)
      agros calculix codeaster dune elmer and febio

      this is not even a complete list,
      its not your fault for needing a computer to do your job. it is your fault for thinking there is only one very expensive way to skin a cat.

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
    44. Re:its 2013 by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      And if you think any of that stuff on the wiki list actually is as good as an Autodesk program [...]

      Let me stop you right there and point out that I never said anything of the sort.

      Re-read what I said. My very first sentence was, "With the exception of Solidworks, every single one of those is available for Mac". Sure enough, AutoCAD 2011, 2012, and 2013 are all available for the Mac, with 2014 coming soon (you can even buy AutoCAD LT 2013 through the Mac App Store, though you have to go to their site to get the full version). Stop assuming someone is an idiot before you check even the most basic of facts to see if they are right.

      Now, I did suggest an alternative would be necessary for Solidworks, and I'll grant that I am ignorant when it comes to viable alternatives for it (it's been over a decade since the last time I had to do CAD work), but I never suggested that AutoCAD should be replaced with a less powerful tool, as you are alleging.

    45. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is that you're supid enough to buy Sony computing equipment after XCP, OtherOs, and the other customer-hostile things Sony has done. I mean come on, you're dumb enough to buy computer equipment from a vendor that was caught rooting their paying customers' computers?

    46. Re:its 2013 by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry computer hardware is so confusing for you. Sony did not manufacture the touch-pad. This model is used in other laptops as well.

    47. Re:its 2013 by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I have a Broadcom BCM4318 (rev 02) wireless adapter. Dates back to the machine, around 2006, and it's still a bitch to get working because of its proprietary firmware. I'm stuck on openSUSE 12.2 for the indeterminate future because I just don't have a wired Ethernet connection to hook it up to for the initial install; otherwise, I'd be stuck with a pretty useless computer that can't even get on the Internet. I don't know if that Wi-Fi problem has been fixed (I hope like hell so), but for the most part everything else works.

      That's pretty much it though. Even nVidia drivers, which are usually relatively to install with the official installer anyway, often either come pre-installed or with easy distro-specific installers. I had some problems with a new (at the time) Creative sound card I got, but that was years ago and Linux quickly gained support for it.

      What is the state of Linux Wi-Fi these days anyway, as of 2012 and 2013? If I were to walk in the store like, say, Staples and pick up a replacement Wi-Fi card, would it automatically work in most distributions? Or would I still have to jump through ridiculous hoops just to get the thing to work correctly? Are there any good Linux-compatible wireless adapters?

    48. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ernie Ball disagrees with you. Ernie Ball make the world's best guitar strings, and went 100% non-MS after MS treated them badly. There are a lot of companies that have gone all Linux. Unless you're a professional digital artist, drafting or engineering house, or a gamer, there's absolutely no need for Microsoft whatever.

    49. Re:its 2013 by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's the businesses (including schools) that want Microsoft Office... and those people in the general public that actually "want" Microsoft's product only want it because:

      1. That's what they learned in school and were taught that it is the standard that all businesses use.
      2. That's what they use at work.
      3. They don't know about any alternatives, and have the mindset that if something is "free" or not the de-facto "standard" then it is crap.
      4. They haven't dared to subject themselves to the horrors of the lengthy Microsoft EULA (hey, I wouldn't want to read that shit either, to be honest), or if they did they just don't care if they're using it as permitted or not.

      The schools and businesses are at fault here. How can it *not* be good to your customers to suggest a free, functional office suite over an expensive, highly restricted, proprietary one? Unless, of course, these "customers" you are talking about are large businesses and corporations with some stakes in Microsoft and its partners. The only things MS Office has going for it are its "business" reputation and schools teaching and recommending it specifically, further increasing this reputation and increasing familiarity with this specific program's quirks.

      Schools should be teaching the basics of word processing, spreadsheets, databases, etc. in general; not any specific brand of program. But instead, they typically require none other than MS Office. No thanks, I'll continue to use LibreOffice when I need such a program. At least that program uses real standards, not some proprietary binary junk that can't even be read successfully between versions.

    50. Re:its 2013 by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      So all Linux distros (and therefore, OS choice) must be eradicated for the "year of Linux" to occur? Since when was choice a bad thing? Have you taken a walk down the cereal aisle of your local supermarket, or been to a car lot lately? It's funny that people aren't complaining about choice when it comes to food and vehicles, as well as just about any other good you can think of.

      2006 was the year of Linux on my desktop after a couple of years exploring, learning, and trying different distros out.

    51. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Continue sucking those dicks and shut the fuck up, assfuck.

    52. Re:its 2013 by wadeal · · Score: 1

      I agree on static devices Linux "Just Works ^tm" but even on your own example of Android it's a headache. I have a Samsung Galaxy S 2, my work provided phone is an iPhone 4 and my partner has a Nokia Windows 7.5 phone of some kind. Of all 3 the Android phone is BY FAR the buggiest and most least user friendly. It consistently locks up at random times, GPS is still innacurate as shit at times and things are just no where near as smooth. My partner who is not at all technical has at no point ever asked for help doing something on Windows phone - previously on her LG Android POS it was constant issues and "how do I do x again?". Kinda exactly like my Linux on desktop experiences! Also I'm no MS Fanboy - I'm the first to attack them on many things and there phone OS is still not near OK I.E. There Sharepoint app requires some non default BS security enabled on your server, but download any Sharepoint App on Android or IOS and no issues, Just Works. They also don't get the Just Works idea sometimes, but the Linux Community on desktop don't at all.

    53. Re:its 2013 by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact, it really is your fucking fault. Because you're a bitch, that's why. You simply accept whatever is put around you and don't start complaining until you have to start taking it up the ass, when you should have known very well beforehand that it would happen. I, on the other hand, take care to point out these flaws. And I generally have enough logic and rational persuasion to convince people that they don't want to settle for a locked in platform.

      And just because your infrastructure is built around lock-in and bad technologies doesn't mean it should stay that way. It's only gonna get worse the longer you do nothing about it. You didn't magically start out in the position that you're in today. You started digging a hole, and continued digging it deeper and deeper - and it won't stop getting deeper until you get out for good and standard on platforms that don't lock you in this way. This kind of foresight should be obvious to system architect, and he/she will do everything in his/her power to avoid getting caught in that position, assuming he's not drinking the MS/other vendor's kool-aid.

      In short, stop being a coward, take a stand for yourself, and make a bloody effort to fix the damn situation. Sometimes, I have to put in additional upfront work (and sometimes I don't, even), but I never find myself complaining in retrospect. You on the other hand, seem to support taking the easy path, even though you know very well that you're putting your fate in your vendors' hands. In other words, you're compromising on yourself, and making the situation worse, not just for you, but for everyone else as a result. Yes, you are entirely at fault for that.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    54. Re:its 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, its your own damn fault.

      Yeah - I guess it's my fault for needing Photoshop, Solidworks, AutoCAD, Excel, Word, etc. to share files with my customers.

      Hmm, if I'm right all that software runs fine on a mac and OSX doesn't need activating at all

  16. Chat support? Oh, please no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As bad as phone menu systems are, you know exactly when you're being delayed and blown off, and it's far easier to read the competence level of both the support technician and the caller. I have never had a positive experience with chat-based support.

  17. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    Where's your receipt or invoice for what you purchased from Google? That's the difference. If you pay for one of their products, you get pretty decent support.

  18. It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by alexhs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's 2013, and Windows Activation Is Still Frustrating

    It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ?

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because modern and open gaming still isn't viable and stable on another platform.

      And if you say consoles I will laugh in your face.

    2. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also using lubuntu. While one of them lets me reconfigure every aspect of the GUI style, the other actually lets me change how the inputs behave.
      Unless there is some secret command-line key, only known to those who know what to Google for, which allows me to change the 'single-click-on-border' to 'select' rather than 'start-dragging.'

      Get over yourselves, just because all three of your friends use Hurd does not make your life a statistically meaningful sample.

    3. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's 2013, and Windows Activation Is Still Frustrating

      It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ?

      Because it's fast, stable, runs all games and programs I've ever needed. All printers, scanners, webcams, dj equipment, breakout boxes for audio recording just work. I also activated 3 copies with a click of a button. Seriously, why aren't you using Windows in 2013?

    4. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Because we have applications that only run on Windows. I hear that's not uncommon.

    5. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Windows 7 is excellent OS.

    6. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by readingaccount · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not uncommon at all. Just that some people on Slashdot live in their own reality and cannot believe this can possibly be a reason.

      Shit, I prefer Windows 7 over any Linux distro I've tried so far. Some people can't even COMPREHEND a preference for Windows over Linux. Which is why I hate this place sometimes and it's clearly against what I read on many other sites.

    7. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not uncommon at all. Just that some people on Slashdot live in their own reality and cannot believe this can possibly be a reason.

      Shit, I prefer Windows 7 over any Linux distro I've tried so far. Some people can't even COMPREHEND a preference for Windows over Linux. Which is why I hate this place sometimes and it's clearly against what I read on many other sites.

      Short story: Res ipsa loquitur.
      Long story: Because SLASHDOT is not for people that prefer windows over linux.

    8. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Not everything works perfect in Linux. I use Fedora as a host with Windows in a vm. Why? Because nothing is worse than mangling people's performance reviews because HR uses documents in Office format that get mangled by LibreOffice. Or having to sit on a jump box all day to manage MS servers (AD, Exchange, MS SQL, etc.). Writing Powershell scripts is less productive...as is those bad internal apps that require IE (yes, they still exist in the corporate world). Being Linux-only is a nice goal...but is not feasible for larger corporations unless your only job is managing UNIX/Linux servers all day.

    9. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are plenty of applications that only run on Windows. If you feel bound by applications, that is. There are much less tasks you can do on Windows but can't do on other platforms. Conversely, on the fast-growing mobile computing front, from their popularities and rich application catalogs, it seems that iOS/Android devices have plenty of capabilities that no Windows device can offer in a compelling way.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    10. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Because I have a lot of windows-only software I like/want to run.
      2) Because I actually like MS's IDE tools for programming.
      3) Because it's the most common platform around, making it easy to exchange data/documents in formats others I work/play with in ways that are easiest for them to use and see the files the same way I do.
      4) Because I hate tweaking the hell out of BSD/Linux desktop systems to get sane settings (1 pixel-wide window-resize grabbers on Ubuntu? on my 1080p system? Really?)

      I've got a number of both BSD and Linux systems. They are generally servers and firewalls. I've gone one desktop that I use part of the time. I'm not a MS-only fanboy, but I do deal with reality.

    11. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the other OSes don't do the job for the majority of us. Why are you still breathing?

    12. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read the article. He was playing a mmorpg. Something linux, and phones, traditionally fail at in varying degrees.

    13. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people can't even COMPREHEND a preference for Windows over Linux.

      As demonstrated by the multiple 'flamebait' mods you got smacked with, but the 'interesting' mods do imply that there might be hope for the forums in general, though probably not for the current crop of zealots.

    14. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      If I play games, I can use Windows since nothing bad happens when (not "if") I spend a week for killing viruses and installing drivers. If I use computer for work I should be absolutely sure it works and will work when I need it. "Will write a letter with bad font" is acceptable. "Will need to work from command line" is acceptable. "Cannot do it due to virus" - NOT acceptable.

    15. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      For "Mangled by LibreOffice" read MSOffice does not meet it's own spec

      managing MS Servers not using Windows is asking for trouble (works find the other way round of course)

      Powershell without Windows is asking for trouble

      Basically you are trying to use Windows tools and are surprised that they don't play well with other OS's

      But managing the other OS from Windows is easy ...so which company is the issue ...?

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    16. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a computer moron then. I can't even recall the last time my systems got infected with viruses. People throw that "when not if" thing around all the time as if it makes them sound smarter but it doesn't. You get massive viruses and spend weeks installing drivers? What the hell are you doing? Trying to get an ISA Voodoo graphics running under Win8? Quit being a cheapass and get some newer hardware. Anything older than about 6 years is gonna have problems when you try to upgrade it to the latest and greatest. You know what you do then? You leave it running on whatever was new for it's time and you can get decades of use out of it. There is a very easy way to fix the virus problem. Run Avast, run Firefox with AB+, get a hosts file from MVPS, run PeerBlock, and stop clicking on every goddamned link your buddy sends you through Facebook.

    17. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Linux people have their head in the clouds (no pun intended). Don't get me wrong - I love Linux. However it has it's place - networking, servers, back-office heavy lifting, etc. But Linux as a mainstream alternative for the desktop PC OS.. People, stop diluting yourselves. Without the software base - it will never fly in that regard. There simply is no incentive to make high quality software for The Linux Desktop PC.(Don't say games - I'm talking about getting work done.) Nothing would make me happier to rid my network of windows machines - but in reality that's not going to happen. Take Gimp for instance - as hard as it is for me to say it doesn't hold a candle to even older versions of Photoshop. (Insert denial statement here _________________). It's always hit or miss with Linux.

      Let the Flames begin in 4 - 3 - 2 - 1......

    18. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because its better than everything else.

    19. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you've got Windows 8's repulsively-large (4px!) window borders. And because Microsoft knows better than you do, they have taken the liberty to remove the setting from the system options, requiring you to download some third-party program to bring the window borders to a sane size. At least, running Linux, I can manually adjust that setting as I see fit with no need to wander off to random websites and download a potentially dangerous executable.

    20. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That would annoy me too, though I hardly ever use window grabbers these days:

      alt-left drag anywhere to move a window.
      alt-right drag anywhere in the general vicinity of the desired corner to resize. GNOME seemed to make this alt-middle instead for some reason.

       

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    21. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It's 2013, and Windows Activation Is Still Frustrating

      It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ?

      Funny in 2003 I could escape Windows much easier.

      Windows now is stable and has the free software components and apps have all improved. Maybe I am more important now and need the grownup apps where StarOffice was in the old days. It is not now.

      Windows is not the piece of crap it once was and Linux no longer has the cool stable GUIs nor a monopoly on development tools it once had.

    22. Re:It's 2013, why are you still using Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to spend some time learning Windows properly. That's what I did with Linux, and that's why I'm competent at managing it today.

      If you spend a week killing viruses and installing drivers, I'm sorry but you're either incompetent or an idiot. It should be "if", not "when", because taking the appropriate measures to defend yourself will go a along way. They're actually the same measures that you take on Linux, so it shouldn't be too hard to learn: don't launch binaries that you don't trust, be careful with browser plugins, keep your system updated and do not run software as administrator unless it is required.

  19. Activate it by... Firefox by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

    Last time I tried validate a Windows install, I think it was Win7, the WGA check was not working under IE. I opened it using Firefox, and it worked. Seriously.

    1. Re:Activate it by... Firefox by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I don't remember ever needing a web browser to validate Windows 7.

  20. switch to Linux... by FudRucker · · Score: 0

    and that problem will be solved...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:switch to Linux... by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Ditto. It will save your sanity too!

    2. Re:switch to Linux... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Get back to me when all the MS specific software is ported to linux.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:switch to Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. Just suffer the WGA etc. in silence - at least in mail addressed to microsoft.

    4. Re:switch to Linux... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Clarify: Do you really mean "MS specific software," or are you really talking about "Windows specific software?" I can understand the second case (third party software for Windows), but why the hell would I want to run Microsoft software? That's kind of what I left Windows for in the first place; more secure, more sanely-designed software than what Microsoft puts out. Specifically, non-Microsoft software.

  21. Thank me later. by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Install the icedtea-7-plugin package using any installation method. more detailed instructions here https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Java.

    To be fair installing the the whole of Ubuntu is now a few basic dialog boxes and leave for 20 minutes

    I know your trolling but Linux Desktop market share has been steadily rising for sometime, and that is without the onslaught of Chrome (and soon Android Boxies).

    1. Re:Thank me later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original post is a TROLL in itself. Please

    2. Re:Thank me later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome, the browser, is going to help increase linux on the desktop?

      Interesting.

    3. Re:Thank me later. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      obviously he was talking about chromeOS

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Thank me later. by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have now installed Ubuntu 13.04 4 times and for every installation, I had to wait between 20 to 30 minutes for the files to download. After which I had to respond to a dialog box which had only one response. The response was forward. Only after clicking on it did it finish with the installation. I have a mixture of windows and Ubuntu computers. My windows computers do not recognize any of my Ubuntu computers. I do have a program called Network Magic that will tell me if my Ubuntu computers are on line so it can be done. My Ubuntu computers just give me an error message when I try to access my network. I do have a goflex network drive that is recognized by all of my windows computers but not any of my Ubuntu computers so it is hard to back up any of those to that network drive. Backing up one's computer should be done automatically after one shuts down the computer. Restoration should be part of the installation dvd as it should be able to recognize a network drive and a backup copy and ask if it should restore that copy. I recently got a laptop since it was not working. I found that the problem was the hard drive. Since the hard drive did not work it would not recover from the second partition. There was a sticker on it with the code for windows but it had long been worn off. I did not have a windows 7 installation disk and did not have a code so it would be difficult for me to reinstall windows. I installed Ubuntu on it. I did spend around a hour on the hp site but did not find a solution. I do not think anyone cares a lot after the sale.

    5. Re:Thank me later. by jedidiah · · Score: 0

      > My windows computers do not recognize any of my Ubuntu computers.

      And the problem is what exactly? That even lame versions of Linux don't come preloaded with handy root exploits?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Thank me later. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you're an Ubuntu user, and can't get your Windows PCs to see the Ubuntu systems, or the Ubuntu systems to see the Windows machines.... Frankly, you're an idiot. First time I tried accessing a Windows machine or setting up a shared directory, Ubuntu has ALWAYS prompted me to install Samba, which I do, which completely fixes the problem your stupendous amount of idiocy can't seem to over come.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    7. Re:Thank me later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have now installed Ubuntu 13.04 4 times and for every installation, I had to wait between 20 to 30 minutes for the files to download.

      Yes, apt is a bit slow, but if I compare it to the most recent windows 7 install disk available, try updating it "normally" until it is up to date. How many reboots does it need? How long does it take?

      My windows computers do not recognize any of my Ubuntu computers. I do have a program called Network Magic that will tell me if my Ubuntu computers are on line so it can be done.

      There is no such thing as "recognize a computer". You can ping your ip range and see who answers.

      For example nmap -sP 192.168.1.0/24 will tell me after about 3 seconds who is online. (I'm sure there are many GUI ways to do this too).

      A simpler thing would be running avahi-discover, a simple GUI that shows all devices which run a zeroconf service like avahi or bonjour including the services they advertise.

      My Ubuntu computers just give me an error message when I try to access my network.

      There is no such thing as "accessing the network". You can e.g. access windows (samba) shares via the smb/cifs protocol. But not "the network".

      Also, this is not helpful the least because you didn't say what the error message even was about.

      I do have a goflex network drive that is recognized by all of my windows computers but not any of my Ubuntu computers so it is hard to back up any of those to that network drive.

      There is no such thing as "recognizing a network drive". You can access it through a given protocol. I looked at this website:
      http://www.seagate.com/external-hard-drives/desktop-hard-drives/goflex-home/

      Maybe I didn't look close enough but I saw nowhere there what protocols it uses. Not even in the "Datasheet" PDF. Probably some painful protocol like ndas where you would need https://github.com/iocellnetworks/ndas4linux
      (Don't try it, it is really painful)

      I skimmed through the User Guide but only see them mention "use the software".

      In short: Don't buy devices with documentation that is that useless. No really, don't do it. There is no argument "well, it *should* work". Of course it *should* work. But if the only documentation they have is "Use our proprietary software", then this is not a device that provides "More freedom for your digital life." but a device that provides more vendor lock-in to windows or mac os to your digital life.

      Backing up one's computer should be done automatically after one shuts down the computer. Restoration should be part of the installation dvd as it should be able to recognize a network drive and a backup copy and ask if it should restore that copy. I recently got a laptop since it was not working. I found that the problem was the hard drive. Since the hard drive did not work it would not recover from the second partition. There was a sticker on it with the code for windows but it had long been worn off. I did not have a windows 7 installation disk and did not have a code so it would be difficult for me to reinstall windows. I installed Ubuntu on it. I did spend around a hour on the hp site but did not find a solution. I do not think anyone cares a lot after the sale.

      Solution to backing it up? Sorry, but I don't find what you write clear at all. The hard disk was broken? But you installed Ubuntu on it?

      The "deja dup" default backup tool seems to have an astonishing amount of bad reviews. But if you search "ubuntu backup" or something like that there is lots of stuff coming up like https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BackupYourSystem

      Some clicking around seems to indicate that the GUI backup solutions are a bit lacking, but I don't really see anything that would be a real obstacle for anyone taking 15 minutes to make sure their data is protected.

    8. Re:Thank me later. by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, this right here folks is why Linux has never and likely will never take off on the desktop. From usenet to forums to Slashdot, the typical response to "I can't get this distro to do what I need it to" is usually "fuck you, you hopeless moron, die in a fire".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Thank me later. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Install the icedtea-7-plugin package using any installation method. more detailed instructions here https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Java.

      I like how you seem to think that supports the notion that installing Java on Linux is easy.

      To be fair installing the the whole of Ubuntu is now a few basic dialog boxes and leave for 20 minutes

      Same as above, except s/Java on//.

      I know your trolling but Linux Desktop market share has been steadily rising for sometime, and that is without the onslaught of Chrome (and soon Android Boxies).

      Meaningless. On PCs, Linux is a distant (and I mean distant) third. It's all but entirely irrelevant.

      I also find it amusing that you think Chrome and Android are "Linux". They run a modified Linux kernel, and beyond that the similarities increasingly fall apart.

      And FYI, I like Linux. A lot. I run it from time to time, and if it weren't for OS X, it would be my primary OS.

    10. Re:Thank me later. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      The sole reason for the tone of my comment is the fact he's using Ubuntu (a distro I actively use) and trying to do something I've had to do many times, while not paying attention to any dialogs that show up. Any time you try to enable a Windows compatible folder share in Ubuntu, without Samba installed, it prompts you to install it. You can't ignore the dialog without being an idiot. If what he was trying to do required a rarely needed package, that'd be one thing and I wouldn't have a need to call him out for it... But we're talking Samba here, any Linux user worth a damn working in a mixed environment knows that it's required for Windows interoperability.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    11. Re:Thank me later. by lgw · · Score: 1

      And someone trying Linux for the first time? Someone who not a "Linux user worth a damn"? Someone who's just used to being able to browse the machines on his local network without installing any packages or doing anything special? Those guys should stick with Windows, I guess.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Thank me later. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      First time linux users are going to get the same dialog as experiencd linux users when attempting to set up Windows viewable folder shares or access Windows hosted fileshares. It's their fault for ignoring a fairly obvious dialog box instructing them on what do to solve the problem. Ubuntu practically guides you though using file sharing when working in tandem with Windows PCs, so you can't exactly claim ignorance.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    13. Re:Thank me later. by ixidor · · Score: 1

      the goflex crap uses some version of samba. we have one here at work ... i hate it ... occasionally it will just ... not...be... there.. and need a reboot. but yeah Samba. which should be accessible by just about everything ( except poster has not installed Samba on his machine).

    14. Re:Thank me later. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      If you are having trouble configuring Samba, try installing webmin. It give you an easier interface.

    15. Re:Thank me later. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Those guys should stick with Windows, I guess.

      Without trying to be insulting to anyone, there is some merit in what you wrote. I have seen people have trouble going from Windows to Mac. I've seen people have trouble going from Windows to Linux.

      It's often a case of expecting everything Linux - or OSX - to exactly correspond to everything Windows. And a certain brittleness that only allows for one way to do anything. All of thes computers work, our personal opinions and experiences notwithstanding. (nex follows some stuff that some migh find insulting - it's just meant ot be illustrative) In this odd world, Going to Synaptics Package manager is really, really hard. searching in the Quick filter is so unintuitive that it must have been designed by a dyslexic Abyssinian. Not having even though about in stalling Java, I opened Synaptics Package Manager. Some folks might find it discouraging to type in their password. I did a quick filter on java, and up popped a number of java apps. It's possible that the number might be intimidating, but I just scroll down to that icedtea plugin, click on it and there ya go!

      Another click or two, and it goes to the repository, downloads it and asks if I want to install anything else needed (it would really be silly to click "no", but a lot of Windows users are afraid of getting viruses)

      But that's just one example. Wandering though the morass of Windows stuff is acceptable, but opening a shell in Linux is not. Bu't I also think another reason is that someone tried Linux a long time ago, and has decided that all Linus for ever and ever will be exactly like their experience. That is like saying that Metro is exactly the same as Windows 3.1.

      Then again, we still have people who think that a Mac has only one mouse button, strange but true. I haven't had a one button mouse on a Mac for over 15 years. Or that all drivers for Linux have to be manually installed.

      I've been using Linux for a little over two years now, and installed from an .iso disk that allowed me to make a dual boot system. I only had one problem, whne I made a partition too small, changed that, and it was less difficult than installing Windows off a disk. I recently reinstalled Windows on 3 computers from scratch. I had to maunally install the sound drivers, the Ethernet drivers, the Graphics drivers. I had to install from the original OS service pack 2 disks, then due to some Windows weirdness, I had to get Service Pack 3 on .iso to finish that.

      The much more difficult Linux distro not only set up the dual boot all by itself, but as soon as it booted up first time, went out to the net and got all my drivers.

      So I hate to break it to the Linux haters, if you can't use it, look to yourself to find the problem.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Thank me later. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I like how you seem to think that supports the notion that installing Java on Linux is easy.

      I'm an OSX, Linux, and when I have to be, Windows support person.

      But I'm curious - what about installing Java on Linux is difficult? To me, it's about the same level of difficulty as installing a printer on a Mac. Which is to say, not very.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:Thank me later. by SoldierII · · Score: 1

      I recently reinstalled Windows on 3 computers from scratch. I had to manually install the sound drivers, the Ethernet drivers, the Graphics drivers. I had to install from the original OS service pack 2 disks, then due to some Windows weirdness, I had to get Service Pack 3 on .iso to finish that.

      What version of Windows was this? Could it be that it is old version (like XP)? Could it be that during your Linux install you used current version of that time and therefore had less issues?

      Meaning, when I install Windows 7/8 today, I get all my drivers working at first install. Unlike Current version of Ubuntu that does not support my WiFi device...

  22. Not So Bad by jasper160 · · Score: 1

    My company uses MS KMS and we never have a problem. And the few that are not on our network have never been a problem as far as activation. The real PITA are the crap engineering software companies we deal with. Try licensing products from Trimble, AutoDESK, ESRI, ETAP, or Helios3D to name a few. None of these companies know what an enterprise network is much less anything else that has occurred in IT in the past ten years. If they were all as “bad” as MS or ESX it could save days of man hours.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  23. Already has the best antipiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't need any other antipiracy measures. With Windows 8, they have created the best anti-piracy every; they created software nobody wants.

  24. Re:Dump Microsoft by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Open Source is more like a house full of IKEA furniture. You need some basic skills and sometimes a bit of improvising to get what you want, but the end result is pretty useable and very versatile, even if some of the edges are still a little rough.

    Windows is a furnished apartment. It looks better and the stuff that you need is all there and works great. You need absolutely no skills because the landlord will take care of it, but you can't do a lot of renovations. Fortunately, your landlord has gone around to all the furniture stores in town and made sure that most furniture you can buy will fit in your apartment.

  25. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    That is the similarity.

    There, fixed that for you. Or do you get a receipt from Microsoft when you buy a PC from the shop around the corner?. No home user does any business with Microsoft, but Microsoft likes to say so whenever that is convenient for them. And deny it when it is not convenient (like, if you refuse the license and want your money back).

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  26. Acitivation Complications by gary_johnson_53 · · Score: 1

    I have a lot of success using online forums, even Microsoft's. When I tired to use the forums for an activation issue with Vista a few years back, the vendor I bought Vista from and Microsoft wanted me to call for help. Wait on a telephone line for ..... The response in the forums was I had an illegal version of Vista. The response on the phone was that it was legal. I returned it to Microsoft and got my money back

  27. If you think that's bad by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Try upgrading from Server 2012 Evaluation Edition to Server 2012 Fully licensed. It's not just jumping through hoops its a whole damn Gimcana.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:If you think that's bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get it to work? I've had to reinstall entire servers cause some idiot installed the eval instead of the MSDN version

  28. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 downloads drivers for all of my hardware, excepting only the really old stuff, the really new stuff and the really oddball stuff I order on eBay from Hong Kong. The only real issue I've had is with Dell and HP boxes, but I have a feeling that's more about Dell/HP not releasing the drivers to MS.

  29. Proprietary crap by argoff · · Score: 1

    Everything abut Microsoft is frustrating. Constant popupups, talking nagging paper-clips, can only log in one user account at a time unless you pay out the nose, a window8 GUI trying to shove apps down out throats even if we're a desktop, all versions of word are more incomparable with each other than open office is, how they try to force me into bing, how they try to obsolete older versions like XP - even though it works perfectly fine on older PC's, even worse, how they try to obsolete older versions of office. Don't even get me started with VB VBscript, and their basterdized versions of html and javascript.

    However, all of these annoyances are not problems, they are symptoms of a company who can't compete on service, so instead they try to compete by shoving proprietary crap down our throats. Then they wonder why companies that 'get it' like google, waltz in and rip them a new asshole, while linux effectively kicked their ass in the dataceter market. I know being able to gouge the fuck out of people with proprietary licensing is like a security blanket to them, but really, in order to compete they just need to give it up. It's dulling them.

    1. Re:Proprietary crap by wadeal · · Score: 1

      Constant popupups

      There's balloon popups and Security Centre/Action Centre that both can be disabled very easily via either Control Panel or Policy across multiple PCs as required. I see a popup saying your AV is out of date, that you have no AV or that you should setup a backup as a good thing for home users - in a business it's not and thus disabled via policy. Tell me I'm wrong.

      talking nagging paper-clips

      I think last version where this came on as default was 2003? You're really using a 10 year old slight annoyance that again could be very easily disabled via settings in Office or Policy as your argument against MS?

      can only log in one user account at a time unless you pay out the nose

      Sitting here on Windows 7 I can click start and select Switch User any time I want - won't be concurrent but that's multiple users logged in. If you want multiple then Microsoft provide Remote Desktop Services (you may call it Terminal Services because you're obviously a dinosaur) which is a very robust set of technologies and features for multiple server logons through multiple methods that I believe is more than far that MS ask to be paid for.

      a window8 GUI trying to shove apps down out throats even if we're a desktop

      When you create an account you can choose whether or not to have a Microsoft or Local Account. Choose Local and uninstall the Apps. Again controllable by Policy. I do agree with you though that pushing a touch OS on Desktop is stupid.

      all versions of word are more incomparable with each other than open office is

      I can open a 20+ year old Word file in Word 2013 and can then open a brand new Word file in Word 2000 or later with updates. There are issues with formatting when converting Word files from doc to docx but MS provide tools to identify and fix these issues before converting if required. The updated document formats provide many features and collaboration abilities that you would complain are missing otherwise.

    2. Re:Proprietary crap by wadeal · · Score: 1
      And because Slashdot seems to either impose some kind of miniscule undocumented character limit or something is broken here's part 2:

      how they try to force me into bing

      They set the default home page as their own search page? Surprised? Or that the default search is Bing? What's the default search in Chrome? Again, easily changed, they never try to force or change your choice if you change it and controllable via Policy across multiple PCs.

      how they try to obsolete older versions like XP - even though it works perfectly fine on older PC's

      You had over 10 years, you knew how long they would support it from day 1. All they're doing is stopping security updates - no ones saying you can't keep using it. Please give me another OS that will have been supported for 13 years.

    3. Re:Proprietary crap by argoff · · Score: 1

      ... but you made my point though, (the same is true with MS security too) you can get it right if you go through a bunch of bullshit, but they always make it a pain in the ass, or gouge you.

    4. Re:Proprietary crap by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      how they try to force me into bing

      They set the default home page as their own search page? Surprised? Or that the default search is Bing? What's the default search in Chrome? Again, easily changed, they never try to force or change your choice if you change it and controllable via Policy across multiple PCs.

      IE actually helpfully asks if you want to customize it on startup, and one of the customizations is search providers, to which you click, check "Use as default" and boom, Google is default. Sucks that you just click "use defaults" and expect Microsoft to promote a competitor's product.

      Heck, I think the default homepage isn't Bing, but MSN.

    5. Re:Proprietary crap by wadeal · · Score: 1

      Pain in the ass? Microsoft provide better documentation, both from an enterprise and consumer level, than any other vendor for how to change these type of things. Your igorance is not shared. As for gouging - not one single point of yours I've quoted involves any financial costs.

  30. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

    Whats sad is that this really isn't that hard to do! PCI and USB vendor IDs are issued by their respective SIG and are readily available. Even if there is no central database of device specific IDs (aside from the wiki/user contributed ones), having the vendor's name is a good start.

  31. Re:Chat support? Oh, please no. by Stickybombs · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that for the majority of people, if their PC and/or internet aren't working correctly, chat support would be completely useless.

  32. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows does install "most" drivers. You can't expect to install drivers for your 10 year old pci modem can you?

  33. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    Wrong. They need *community support* like so many Linux distros have. I have never had better help from the community than I ever, ever got through paid support.

    This will never happen though! These people bought, along with their licensed "rentals" of Windows, a sense of indignation that stops them from entering and contributing to a community support structure. It requires a certain level of humbleness.

  34. s/Activation// by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bought a brandnew HP laptop for my gf. Windows 8 is a pain to use without touch screen. I don't dare to move the mouse near any corner of the screen again ...

    1. Re:s/Activation// by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought a brandnew HP laptop for my gf. Windows 8 is a pain to use without touch screen. I don't dare to move the mouse near any corner of the screen again ...

      s/gf/figment of your imagination/

  35. Timewarp by Luthair · · Score: 0

    Did this complaint fall through a timewarp from 2001? The consumer Windows activation is something Microsoft has actually done well. I've probably performed at least 20 installs over the years and never had a single issue, nor have I ever heard any complaint from anyone else I know.

  36. Re:who was he even talking to? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    You forgot 'don't install media centre add on as it invalidates your key without warning you this will happen' which, if you'd read the article, you'd know.

  37. Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If this activation has reduced that piracy then either one of two things has happened:

    1) The price of Windows has come down.

    It hasn't.

    2) The profits for Windows has gone up.

    I can't say it has or hasn't, but the revenues didn't show a sharp rise, so I suggest not either.

    So we now have either piracy hasn't been reduced, or it was never a revenue-reducing problem in the first place.

    Which rather suggests that this hasn't done Microsoft any good either.

    1. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I bought a legal OEM version of windows 8 Home Pro for under a hundred. That's cheaper than I could have found for windows 98 ( which was the last version I bought before activation). I think I got windows XP PRO OEM for just over a hundred from a shady website.

      I think the price decrease ( if there has been one) is more of a sign of increased competition from Macs ( and linux to a certain extent), than the activation reducing piracy.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2

      I think the price for Win 8 was more an acknowledgement from MS that Win 8 was a critical release for them and that they knew it was going to be a tough OS to sell.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    3. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Then you bought an upgrade. If you try to install on a clean drive, you're going to fail activation later on.

      (There is a registry tweak you can do to trick it into thinking there was a prior version of windows on the disk, during install time)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Their revenues have not gone up significantly in the last 5 years.

              2008 - 60.42B
              2009 - 57.55B
              2010 - 62.48B
              2011 - 69.94B
                      2012 - 73.7B

      http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/msft/financials

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      No. The OEM version is $100. It just happens to be roughly the same price as the retail upgrade version. This is why I never buy the upgrade version.

      Example:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832416550

    6. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The cost for Windows 8 has gone down.
      Microsoft Profits are up.

      However I expect if Microsoft relaxed it stance on stance on activation, it wouldn't cause a major issue.

      1. Most new versions of Windows comes preinstalled on new PCs a lot of people don't bother upgrading their OS. If they have to pay too much money for it, it will not bother upgrading anyways.

      2. Groups that do buy licenses are often organizations, who want to maintain proper support and legit standing. in case of audits.

      3. For those who want an upgrade but cannot justify the price will stay on the same version, if they can get it threw questionable means, they might do it, they find they like it, and would be less likely to switch to a competing system. After one goes threw the hassle of switching, they will not normally come back for a long time. So for the most part those PC to Mac switchers, means a lot less return customers in the future, their Next computer will not be a Windows PC but a new Mac.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Windows 8, not Windows 8 Pro. Windows 8 Pro OEM is $140 on Newegg.

    8. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed the $15 Windows 8 Pro upgrade on a clean drive. All it needed was any version of Windows XP, Vista or 7 to be already installed on any drive in the system. I've since reformatted the Windows 7 drive and no problems.

    9. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you putting it on a new machine?

      If not, why did you buy it? It's no more legal than pirating it, and at least if you pirate it, you don't have to deal with the activation bullshit.

    10. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use of OEM System Builder software for Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro is subject to the following licensing terms:

      System Builder product may be used:
      As the operating system on a computer that you build for personal use.
      As an operating system running either on a local virtual machine or as an additional operating system in a separate partition.

      System Builder product may not be used:
      As an upgrade licence for an existing underlying Windows operating system.
      To legalise a non-genuine Windows operating system.
      To licence more than five copies of the software (in total) for commercial use.

      http://www.microsoft.com/OEM/en-gb/licensing/sblicensing/Pages/personal-use-license.aspx

    11. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Um, WHAT?
      73.7B - 60.4B = 13.3B increase, that's a bit over 22% increase in revenue in 2012 compared to 2008.
      Compare that to Red Hat total FY12 revenue (1.13B), that's 1.53% of Microsoft's revenue for the same year.

      You must have a very strange definition of "significantly".

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    12. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      22% in 5 years is not significant growth for any company.

      For comparison, Apple grew from 32.5B to 156B in that timeframe.

      http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/aapl/financials

      Or 380% over 5 years.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Maybe I did get Win 8 ( non pro) can't keep up with the Version naming scheme.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    14. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upgrade version of Windows 8 Pro will activate over a pirated copy of Windows 7. I'm just sayin'.

    15. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      But they hiked the price back up after those first few months, if I remember correctly, win8 oem is back up to $100 for some asinine reason.

    16. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      WinXP with a VLK requires no activation.

      --
      Good-bye
    17. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      So 5 specific years of Apple growth metrics is now the yardstick for all of the worlds companies?

      Let's add the next 5 years and then check their average growth over 5 years. Do you think they'll keep it up?

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    18. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      My salary grew 500% over 8 years. I definitely am better than Linux, Microsoft or Apple.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    19. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      So what's your occupation, then?

    20. Re:Piracy? Lets look at that. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, I started with a really lousy job :)
      Besides, I am not from the US, and here in Romania you can increase your salary tenfold in a matter of years if you specialize in something. Minimum wage is below 200 USD.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  38. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Personally I am still waiting for the day when Windows Update will be able to recognize drivers and install & update them.

    Huh? It is able to do that just fine. Another thing is whether they have the most cutting-edge driver available. As part of their quality assurance I think they tend to be a bit on the conservative side.

  39. not for me by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with the activation. I just run this DAZ script and viola! Activated! Who's having trouble? MS support should just mail people the 5kb file and be done with it.

  40. Never had a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with activating any version of windows since windows 95

  41. Re:who was he even talking to? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

    There are very few reasons why a key won't work the first time and they all tie back to the user (this author) being a moron. First, use the correct disc. Second, use the correct CD key for the disc. Third, don't activate until all the devices are installed instead of marked as "unknown device." Fourth, actually activate Windows in the stated time period instead of ignoring it. Fifth, don't activate it more than once per year. And if all else fails just activate it via the Microsoft robot on the phone. It takes approx 4 mins 32 seconds to do. I have never, ever had to talk to a rep in India ever in 10 years in business building and refurbishing computers. So who was he even talking to on the phone and why? Probably a license vs disc-used discrepancy. Definitely, without a doubt, USER ERROR!

    Phrased another way, "We've provided you with a wide variety of possible ways to screw up installation and activation, many of which we could even catch for you and prevent, but choose not to. It's just so much more fun to be able to smile smugly at moron users, who even cares if we make any money?"

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  42. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    What planet are you using Windows Update on? A huge amount of drivers are held in the optional section under hardware in Windows Update. The older a system is and the more common the parts, the more likely it is to be carried in Windows Update's driver database. I think basically all Realtek sound drivers are there. I know virtually everything Intel ever made is there. A lot of Nvidia drivers are there. Even chipset and a TON of monitor drivers are there.

  43. Re:who was he even talking to? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

    My wife ran into an issue with a key for another company years ago for an expansion for a game. Fresh from the store it said it was invalid because it had already been used. Returned it for another copy, same thing, returned for refund and bought it online from the company instead. Definitely not reasonable to consider cracked key gen systems to be user error. I have no idea if that's what is going on here, but at least half of the conditions you listed aren't reasonable user error either. Unless you mean using a Microsoft product in 2013; in that case you've been proven right apparently.

  44. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't activate THEN install 10 device drivers.

    I haven't used Windows in a long, long time, so I'm ignorant here.
    A valid install of Windows can suddenly think it's pirated after you install more device drivers?
    Stay classy, Microsoft.

  45. Which version of Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because unless you're already demanding they use one specific version, your support of the various formats "your customers" use will be better with LibreOffice/GoogleDocs than it will be with the latest version of Word.

    1. Re:Which version of Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because unless you're already demanding they use one specific version, your support of the various formats "your customers" use will be better with LibreOffice/GoogleDocs than it will be with the latest version of Word.

      hmm.. Haven't tried LibreOffice, but GoogleDocs regularly messes up even quite simple Word documents when they go back and forth, something I have not experienced at all between Word 2013 and 2010 which we exchange regularly across with customers/partners - what specifically is it that doesn't work for you?

    2. Re:Which version of Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who gives a shit about Word? How about everything else he spoke about. Do you not understand the bigger picture here? People run businesses, not Half Life festivals

    3. Re: Which version of Word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libre office is a bit better, but still chokes quite often. Even for simple documents, people seem to always find some oddball way to format it that trips up anything but msword .

  46. Getting anally penetrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently you like it since you pay for it

  47. Try reading the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What I didn’t realize is that installing Media Center essentially changed my edition information. Instead of “Windows 8 Pro”, my OS became “Windows 8 Pro with Media Center”. As such, this rendered my original product key entirely invalid for that install."

    " What a complete idiot. Buy a real copy of Windows 7, put it on, activate it, the end."

    Well someones an idiot, but it isn't him. He bought and activated his Windows, they gave him a free media player key, he used it as directed and it messed up his OS.

    " I have never, ever, ever had a problem with a non-big company OEM license ever and I rarely have problems with them either."

    Man am I sick of that "Well that bug never happened to me answer", well whoopy-doo for you! F*ing moron.

  48. stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and use an os that doesnt need "activation" and a company that doesnt force you perform gymnastics every time you want to scratch your arse.

  49. KMS isn't very good either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KMS, what Microsoft uses for a business hosting a bunch of Microsoft licenses isn't very good either. There are about 9 billion steps to get the thing setup. And if you don't have AD, getting the computers to actually connect to the server and activate becomes a problem. Fixable with a script, but still a problem. Why it isn't just one or two registry keys, I will never know.

  50. Windows Upgrade costs $295 by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ironically Activation on Microsoft platform pushed me to Linux

    Windows 8 is not available to me from Microsoft only an upgrade I cannot use. From Microsoft http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/buy?ocid=GA8_O_WOL_Hero_ShopHP_FPP_Null the prices are $155 for a Windows 8 Upgrade or $295 for Windows 8 Pro. I could not find a version of retail Windows 8 anywhere. What is true for you is not true for me.

    1. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could not find a version of retail Windows 8 anywhere

      You're looking for something that doesn't exist because it's no longer needed.

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/Microsoft-Windows-WN7-00403-English-Version/dp/B009HI2W66/ref=sr_1_2?s=software&ie=UTF8&qid=1367939128&sr=1-2&keywords=windows+8

      OEM is the new retail. MS unified the TOS; Win8 OEM's terms are essentially identical to Win7 retail's terms, including the ability to resell it.

    2. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by kenh · · Score: 2

      The page you linked to had a very helpful section for someone in your situation:

      Buying a full version of Windows 8
      If you want to build your own PC and install Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro, or want an additional operating system running in either a local virtual machine or separate partition (including a Mac), you can buy the Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro System Builder products (OEM versions). If available in your country or region, you can buy Windows 8 and Windows 8 Pro System Builder products at participating stores, but you'll need to ask a sales rep for more info. This version doesn't include customer support.

      Source: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows-8/upgrade-to-windows-8#section_5

      It's also interesting that you were "pushed to Linux" by the activation process of a product you claim you couldn't buy.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I just buy the OEM version:

      • Unless modified by the OEM, the OEM and Full Retail are the same except --
      • OEM cannot upgrade over an existing Windows installation
      • OEM must be installed on a "clean" drive
      • OEM cannot be transferred to a new or different computer in the future
      • OEM are not eligible for any free technical support from Microsoft

      The OEM version is cheaper because of these limitations. Since I whitebox all of my PCs, and therefore I'm starting with a blank drive, this is what I go for when building a new Windows PC.

    4. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The $40 offer was a time limited offer.

    5. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So going to your local tech store was out of the question?

      http://windows.microsoft.com/en-CA/windows-8/upgrade-to-windows-8#section_5

    6. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really don't understand what Microsoft is thinking for Windows 8 licensing. They offer the OEM version, which you're legally not supposed to use unless you're building and reselling. They offer the upgrade version, which you're not supposed to use unless you're upgrading. Each version locks itself to specific hardware, so you're not supposed to be able to migrate from one machine to another. So what do you do if you buy a copy for a computer that you already own, and don't have Windows installed?

      They may have a version for that, but I spent a while looking and couldn't find a real answer.

    7. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OEM is the new retail. MS unified the TOS; Win8 OEM's terms are essentially identical to Win7 retail's terms, including the ability to resell it.

      Does that mean that you cannot change even a single part of your computer before you have to buy a new license, like on laptops with a preinstalled Window 8?

    8. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Win 8 OEM has almost full FPP licensing which includes transfers to other hardware. Win 7 OEM did not.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Windows Upgrade costs $295 by socialleech · · Score: 1

      So, lemme get this straight. You took the time to go to his link, find a help section, read enough of it to find what you wanted, quoted it, and linked us to it. All to give this guy some shit. But you didn't think about his post long enough to consider that maybe it wasn't Windows 8 activation that brought him to Linux? Especially considering he claims to have never been able to even attempt an install, let alone an activation, with Windows 8? There are lots of prior version of Windows that had activation built in, and they all sucked.

      Just cause you have a low UID, doesn't mean you aren't an idiot. Or at least an asshole

  51. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by wadeal · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure is there both through Windows Update and the Hardware Installation wizard for vendors to make their drivers available - you can also update the built in Hardware Wizard drivers. It's 100% the vendors fault if it is not there and you should be contacting them and voicing your anger at their shortcomings.

    Microsoft even provide instructions through their built in troubleshooting for devices on how to acquire drivers for some devices where an installer is required (with links and step by step instructions). This is through the Devices and Printers control panel.

  52. what about his media center key? by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    since that was a limited-time offer... does that key still work? or is it now gone forever since his 'windows 8 with media center' took a dump?

  53. No such thing by nine-times · · Score: 1

    it definitely needs an activation system that doesn't make things difficult for its legal customers on a too-regular basis.

    There's no such thing. You're not going to come up with a system that inhibits piracy but also doesn't create more work and effort for legitimate customers. Computers are not smart enough to judge whether what you're doing is "fair".

    1. Re:No such thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      it definitely needs an activation system that doesn't make things difficult for its legal customers on a too-regular basis.

      There's no such thing. You're not going to come up with a system that inhibits piracy but also doesn't create more work and effort for legitimate customers.

      That doesn't matter, because Microsoft already hasn't come up with a system that significantly inhibits piracy. They only have a system which creates more work and effort for legitimate customers. As such, it would make the most sense to remove it entirely and give up. Unfortunately, Microsoft never gives up on anything until long, long past the time when they should drop it, except when they give up before they even get started.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:No such thing by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I agree, and that was pretty much where I was going with my post. I have a hard time saying that you couldn't come up with a system that would be effective at stopping piracy, but it would inhibit legitimate users so severely that it would ruin Microsoft. They know this, so they've made many concessions in their activation scheme, but it makes it weaker at stopping pirates, and yet it's still a pain for legitimate users.

      I think this is pretty much always the case with "activation" schemes. DRM is troublesome enough, but it's likely to become a mess when you start locking things to specific hardware instead of just locking it to an account.

  54. Support Alternatives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People really need to give their support to alternative projects like React OS http://www.reactos.org/

  55. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 downloads drivers for all of my hardware

    Yep, here too. And every time I've tried using Windows Update for my hardware drivers it breaks my PC.

  56. Serves that idiot right for using Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least stick with Windows 7 if you really, really need Windows.

  57. Don't get me started on their activation... by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    We've had plenty of issues with their Office 2013 activation system at our office and when you call in, "oh, I'm sorry, you need to talk to technical support because this is an issue with your PC" What?!?

    These PC's are fine, I just bought this program, activate it!!! So they pass you to another department that has you on hold for a minimum of one hour (not an exaggeration) which also gives you the ability to leave a message if you get tired of waiting. If you leave a message, they'll call you back in a week (also not an exaggeration). When you finally speak to these people they admit they're busy because of issues with Microsoft's activation system (not a fabrication, during two calls this was admitted).

    1. Re:Don't get me started on their activation... by wadeal · · Score: 1

      Users should never see a PC until both Windows and Office is activated. Your IT Support have not done their job correctly - they were slightly correct in saying talk to your tech support. Sometimes Microsoft do have problems with their activation system (when calling) - I'll give you that one. I'd say call back later or some BS but I know what it's like to be say onsite somewhere and needing it done now. For the 99% of the time though the system is pretty good - a lot better than other vendors activation systems/BS.

    2. Re:Don't get me started on their activation... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      These PC's are fine, I just bought this program, activate it!!!

      No, sir, you licensed it. If you intended to buy a program, you should have found another solution — one which is actually for sale.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Don't get me started on their activation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook 2010 gives me intermittent seemingly random activation errors, then usually continues regardless - but sometimes terminates; then I start it again and it's fine.
      It's not good having a critical tool that can suddenly just refuse to work. And yes, I realize that my company may have crappy KMS servers or something, but if it wasn't for the activation 'feature', this issue would not even arise.

    4. Re:Don't get me started on their activation... by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      ... 'Your IT Support'? I think you may have read the wrong post. I was referring to Microsoft's activation team - they forward you to technical support when the Office activation system breaks on a PC. This happens often as can be noted on Microsoft's official forums.

    5. Re:Don't get me started on their activation... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      We've ran into a nasty bug with Dell OEM version of Office 2013. Regardless if this is a manual or pre-installation of Office 2013, we will have to re-activate the product TWICE in a row. We've tried various permutations of pre and post domain member installation; and we've verified it occurs with Windows 8 as well. We suspect this happens when logging in as another user that's a member of the local Administrators group. Regardless, I'm really fucking tired of having to key in that long-ass-number into the phone. It's required when Microsoft flags this instance as having already been activated over the internet once before.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  58. Did anyone else catch this from skimming TFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My question is this- how do you play an MMO at a new apartment with no internet?

  59. Compare it to Android updates by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    In comparison to updating android on your carrier's cell phone, windows updates are a snap! Moreover windows updates even exist whereas once you buy a low-brand tablet or get a carrier locked phone no update may ever even get made for your device.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Compare it to Android updates by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      My LG Optimus V is still running 2.2

  60. Re:Dump Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately that landlord also got the idea he has to re-decorate everything in your house, so doors wont open any longer, and you have new holes in the wall that give "convenient" access to your rooms in a way you don't like.

    Oh - and hes has totally re-designed the finish in your rooms, so in stead of a cozy living environment you have to adapt to a new hard-barred minimal stile without any warmth.

    Oh - and you are the one that going to pay for this re-design. You see - you have to accept it, because he will stop maintenance for the older living room designs. He wont even repair holes in your older apartment, leaving you in the cold and rain.

  61. De-Activation is Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only you could de-activate an install, before upgrading a motherboard for example. So simple!

  62. Yeah well, Linux activation is no fun too by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0

    To activate Linux, you either:

    • Got to blow a Penguin
    • Burn the American flag.
    • Pay Darl McBride 999 dollar.

    Any questions?

    Like fish. Any other questions?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah well, Linux activation is no fun too by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Not just any fish. It absolutely must be herring.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  63. Chrome OS by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Chrome, the browser, is going to help increase linux on the desktop?

    Interesting.

    Chrome is also the name of an OS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome_OS you can see the machines here http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/ on googles site. The range from incredible cheap machines to the incredibly beautiful Pixel. Lin

    1. Re:Chrome OS by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Chrome OS is the name of the OS, and its a lot less confusing when people dont call it just "chrome".

    2. Re:Chrome OS by node+3 · · Score: 1

      In a discussion about operating systems, and Linux in particular, if someone brings up "Chrome" and Android in a similar way, it's pretty damned obvious to all but the most aloof pedant what the writer is referring to.

    3. Re:Chrome OS by kmoser · · Score: 1

      No. Chrome--the shiny metal they trim vehicles with--will help increase Linux on the desktop. This is because people who use Windows are drawn to shiny things they can click on, and chrome is the ultimate shiny thing.

  64. Re:I have an idea by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    I've activated over 150 PCs I built, XP through 7, so if this guy has had nonstop issues activating all the OSes there were, he doesn't know what he's doing. Don't activate THEN install 10 device drivers. That will cause a hardware lock morph that unactivates it. Everyone knows that. Don't download a fucking crack for any OS. They all fall apart eventually. What a complete idiot. Buy a real copy of Windows 7, put it on, activate it, the end. I have never, ever, ever had a problem with a non-big company OEM license ever and I rarely have problems with them either.

    Yeah... how dare he buy new hardware for his computer.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  65. Microsoft Product Activation by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with activating any version of windows since windows 95

    Microsoft Product Activation DRM began with XP, you should practice your spin a little better.

  66. Free Media Center Says use new key from now on by BetaDays · · Score: 1

    When I downloaded and installed the free media center add on, which is what he did, it says you need to keep and use the new key that they gave for use in the future. So the question is why didn't he. I think this really is just a case of someone for forgot that message.

    The real question is what caused the activation screen to come up.

    --
    Paul: Father... father, the sleeper has awakened! - Dune
  67. Phone troubles? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    So the root of the issue is he isn't capable of completing a phone call, and that's Microsoft's fault? Perhaps he should find a landline or another cell phone?

    Not really a huge fan of Microsoft, but I haven't had any issues when on the phone with them. The thought of reformatting your PC because your cell phone is bunk at completing calls is kind of silly. It's also worth noting that online chat isn't as prevalent as he seems to think it is. I would love to have online chat for most of my services, but I don't.

    1. Re:Phone troubles? by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I lost all confidence in the article and writer as soon as he mentioned "despite having a 3/4 bar connection". I get that he had a tough night, but his litany of frustrations directed solely at Microsoft are kind of absurd. Why didn't he activate earlier? Why didn't he try the "silly" steps of calling in before attempting cracks? Why did he so immediately resort to reformat/reinstall?

  68. OSX has DRM too.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was trying to re-install mountain lion and so after booting up the recovery partition, you have to give it your apple id and it validates some shit before giving permission to download the installer files. Its just another fucked up thing that apple forces you to do. Because when you upgrade via the app store.. it downloads the OS, and after installing it.. it quickly deletes the .dmg without giving you a choice to backup the image. So yeah.. the "cdkey" is replaced by the "appleid". Same shit.. different names.

    1. Re:OSX has DRM too.. by armanox · · Score: 1

      Except you can install it on the system unlimited times, and on any system you own. Yeah. Just like activation.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  69. Riddle by operagost · · Score: 1

    What kind of writer doesn't know the difference between the words "riddle" and "rattle"? I honesty couldn't understand the sentence and had to read it three times. And it wasn't just once he did this. Unless Batman was on the other end, I don't think he meant to "riddle" Microsoft.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  70. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no invoice or recepit so what? Why is google forcing users to accept "terms of service" for? Google clearly thinks its giving the users a product/service and receiving "payment" in terms of private user data to profile and sell.

    Besides which.. why the fuck are you so desperately defending some advertising company?

  71. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Requires a certain level of humbleness? I thought community support was cost-saving scheme that's started to be implemented by a number of companies. Sure, it also makes perfect sense for open source, but that's not going to be the only place you see community support in the future.

  72. fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So this idiot doesn't authenticate his Windows installation, complains when it prompts him to do so, tries to install two illegal cracks and complains when they don't work, tries to call MSFT and complains that his phone doesn't work, then decides the next reasonable option is to reformat the machine and then bitches about that. Wow, just be glad you don't live next door to this guy.

  73. "too-regular basis"? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    needs an activation system that doesn't make things difficult for its legal customers Ever.

    FTFY

  74. Re:Dump Microsoft by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Welcome to 2013, 1999 wants its generalizations back. Open Source has been nicely polished overall for the average user (OS and apps) since about Ubuntu Dapper or Android Gingerbread, depending on whether you mean the desktop or a handheld device. You can customize windows, but the result tends to leak around the seams and often you have to pay for the privilege.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  75. No activation by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    and it definitely needs an activation system that doesn't make things difficult for its legal customers on a too-regular basis

    No they really just need to scrap the activation system entirely...
    Such systems only ever harm legitimate customers, pirates will simply use a crack and not have to worry about activation ever again.

    Meanwhile all the resources being spent on creating and maintaining the activation system are resources which are not being spent on improving the product or providing any services which are actually beneficial to customers.

    Personally i detest any software which intentionally contains denial of service code.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  76. How about Adobe? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    Windows activation is frustrating? I've never had a problem with the various version I've installed over the years.

    If you think Windows is frustrating I suggest dealing with Adobe products. Once a computer is associated with a license it's permanently stuck even on old installs. I ran into such a scenario several years ago. We had a purchased copy originally installed on a machine that had long since been tossed for a replacement. We couldn't get the license to be accepted. I called Adobe and was hit with a refusal to transfer the license.

    Just a few months ago my company purchased a Creative Suite upgrade which wouldn't install. The IT guy ends up on the phone with Adobe for almost an hour before he's told that they no longer handle licenses internally, that he had to call a reseller. We then had to wait a day to receive that license. The best part was being on the phone with support in India and being told we were being transferred to someone who could help only to end up back at the same guy. This happened three times and each time the guy over there tried to pass himself off as someone else.

    I really think these articles crop up on Slashdot merely so that people can engage in yet another Microsoft bash fest. It gets to a point where people are grasping at straws. I don't understand if it's a consequence of dealing with Microsoft more often. But I've got friends in IT who deal with much worse from other companies, so I don't really get the ire. In most of these cases I can identify other companies that have done the same or worse, but they're rarely brought up for criticism like Microsoft so frequently is.

  77. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Sure I can. Disk space is cheap. Network bandwidth is cheap. The hardware is trivial to identify,

    Plus Microsoft is supposed to have this stable device driver ABI that's somehow better than what is done in the Linux kernel.

    Being able to "use anything" is actually the whole damn point of using the monopoly product to begin with.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  78. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > It's 100% the vendors fault

    I am feeling a strange sense of deja vu here...

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  79. have your tried RHEL activation? by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 2

    ill take Windows activation over RHEL activation any day.

  80. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    But you're still buying from Microsoft through a third party vendor. If I buy a TV from Best Buy and it has issues, I call Samsung, not Best Buy. With Google, you're not buying a product, period.

  81. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Microsoft Account issue caused by XBox Live region locking my account (even though I've never owned an XBox - I think an old Games for Windows Live title did something to my acount). I got it resolved by using online chat support direct to Microsoft support staff. Shame they don't have it in all their divisions.

  82. Re:What about getting drivers from Windows Update by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    My system gives me something like

    none1@pci0:6:7:0: class=0x0c0010 card=0x81fe1043 chip=0x30441106 rev=0xc0 hdr=0x00
            vendor = 'VIA Technologies, Inc.'
            device = 'VT6306/7/8 [Fire II(M)] IEEE 1394 OHCI Controller'
            class = serial bus
            subclass = FireWire

    and I just look for the specific drivers by name. And it mostly knows the vendor and hardware ID even if it does not have drivers for this specific hardware. If something pretending to be named Operating System does not do this simple task, should it be still named Operating System?

  83. Bound by applications? Welcome to every business. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    As soon as you aren't doing basic wordprocessing and email, you're out of "alternative" platforms. Know what it costs to retrain someone from Pro/Engineer or AutoCAD, or Bentley Analysis (and those are just my narrow field of engineering)? Try $10,000-$40,000 a person, plus a license for the new software under a different OS. Retraining to a technical program in any engineering field is significant. Even retraining administrative workers on a new data entry system can be several thousand dollars a head.

    Android/iOS? Wow, I guess if you're an unemployed hipster it seems like there's so much you can do. Just don't try to do anything significant on that kind of an OS, because it will fail miserably. Good for pet projects, hobbies, and throwaway stuff; lousy for critical billable work except in a pinch.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  84. Re:I have an idea by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't activate THEN install 10 device drivers.

    You blame the user for that and not Microsoft? The hardware has the same PCI/USB vendor and device ID's as before the drivers were installed. Those are detected just fine without drivers. If this really does cause problems, then the real problem is Microsoft basing their hardware configuration hash on anything relating to software and not hardware.

  85. Windows OS, dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the thing that has to be activated now?

    Same point to jellomizer.

    XBox systems (1 and 2) started making money about 2010.

  86. Re:who was he even talking to? by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Third, don't activate until all the devices are installed instead of marked as "unknown device

    And why should this be the user's fault? The hardware doesn't change it's PCI/USB vendor or device ID's after drivers are installed. You can't seriously be telling me that Microsoft's fingerprint of your hardware is based on the drivers and not the hardware. And if you are telling me that, then it's not the author being a moron - it's Microsoft being stupid.

  87. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by mspohr · · Score: 1

    Google does not require mandatory activation.
    Apple does not require mandatory activation.
    Chat support is mandatory when a company has you over a barrel... such as when the stuff you bought from them won't work without their special permission, jumping through hoops, pressing the right keys and sending money.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  88. You pay for that??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that anyone pays for an OS in this day and age is absolutely mind–boggling. The only good product out of Redmond is Office, which can be run very well now in WINE.

  89. Citation redundant. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Its obtuse only if you have paid for it. For the pirates, the activation is included in the ISO

    ...along with a root kit.

    Citation needed.

    Well, the ISO installs Windows. What more citation do you need?

    Of course, this means that both pirates and paying users get the rootkit. But hey, bonus!

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  90. DRM by alienzed · · Score: 1

    Any DRM that isn't user friendly is the problem. This aptly demonstrates which companies are more concerned about their bottom line than they are about the quality of their wares, and any software where quality comes second, is software to avoid.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  91. Crack it, problem solved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had my legal copy of windows 7 have issues with activating. Called them up, talked into a lie detector machine or something, and they handled my problem just fine ... for the first 3 months. And then it deactivated again and again and again. So I installed a crack and it never gave me problems. Not once did I get a problem trying to download anything from microsoft's websites or update. I don't know the legality of cracking owned software but I also don't know the legality of microsoft selling me software that isn't good and refuse to exchange my copy.

    1. Re:Crack it, problem solved! by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      My aunt had the same issue with Win7. So, I just "Upgraded" my Aunt's laptop to Windows8: Kubuntu. I installed Linux, replaced the splash screen and desktop image with a Windows8 logo, and every thing is fine. She even gets along great in conversations between other clueless users like her about how different her Windows8 is from Windows7... Her opinion on adopting "Win8" is: "Oh, sure, it's a bit different, but it's not THAT different, and you get used to it; I don't see what the big deal is, some programs just have to run in Compatibility Mode now" (I installed WINE). Of course her friends think she's nuts, to them Win8 is atrocious.

      Interestingly, one of my more tech-savvy relatives called me up after they bought a brand new Toshiba laptop. It came with win8, he hated it. He has a legit boxed copy of Windows7, and the sales rep (at Toshiba, from toshiba.com) assured him the system would work fine with Win7. It doesn't. The WIFI drivers didn't work out of the box, so we downloaded the WIFI and other drivers for win7 on a another system, and tried to transfer them over and install....... Except the USB drivers didn't work either, so the new laptop couldn't read the USB under the Win7 install. The funny thing is? We just plugged in Ubuntu12.04 live CD on a USB flash drive, booted up just fine (after disabling Secure Boot in BIOS), and the USB works, so do the WIFI drivers. We used Ubuntu to copy the drivers onto the windows partition, then rebooted into Windows7. The WIFI worked, but no matter what we did we couldn't get the USB ports working. We let a Toshiba tech support goon fiddle fart around cluelessy on the system via remote desktop for about an hour (I swear she was just itching to play RDP with someone); They couldn't fix it either.

      The dumb thing is that as soon as Windows7 got on the Internet the product key was said to be invalid. The installer liked it just fine, but the online activation was gorked. End result: We removed Win7's partition, installed Ubuntu12.04 from the USB, and replaced Unity with Gnome3 (because Unity is the Windows8 of Linux DEs). All the drivers work out of the box, even the AMD 3D drivers for the new APU; Runs WoW, and some other games just fine, hooked him up with the Emulated Firefox + Silverlight Netflix "app" to get that running on Linux, and installed Steam too. He called me a few days ago just to talk, and didn't have to uncomfortably as me for free support to diagnose any computer issues either. He said, "Runs like a dream, probably won't be going back to windows after that ordeal."

      I can't decide if it's Toshiba's fault or MS's fault for the driver issue... I mean, Toshiba pays to have the open source drivers developed by a 3rd party, and so Linux just works... They pay just as much to get MS drivers working too, but for some reason solving the driver issue on Linux is easier than on Windows.

      P.S. At one point We did try to D/L a crack for the windows activation issue... Unfortunately none of the ones we initially found were free of malware... Stay thirsty my friend.

  92. Re:Chat support? Oh, please no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's far easier to read the competence level of both the support technician and the caller

    You're reading confidence not competence. The two are sometimes and sometimes not correlated.

  93. Activation DOES provide a benefit to the customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no benefit WHATSOEVER for the customer

    It provides additional incentive to explore options other than MS Windows and Windows applications.

    Every time Microsoft tells a customer "We don't want you as a customer. Stop paying us." the world gets a little bit brighter.

  94. It isn't the 14th yet by tepples · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    my ISP/phone company cannot install my utilities until the 14th

    flimflammer wrote:

    Perhaps he should find a landline

    What do you recommend that the author of the Techgage article do between now and the 14th?

    1. Re:It isn't the 14th yet by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Does he live on a remote planet by himself? No friends? No office? If he had a laptop or iPhone or android phone or iPad or even Windows phones etc, he could have been a Skype call away from completing his activation for a modest fee.

  95. Tech Writer != Technically Knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy is a moron. Instead of calling the free tech support right away with the issue he tried hacking his shit. Wait, hackers aren't super honest people just trying to help fellow man? No wonder he had a hard time after trying that shit.

    If he leaves Windows for good then it's all the better since moronic articles like this will stop showing up on /.

  96. Google Play Store sells a product by tepples · · Score: 1

    With Google, you're not buying a product, period.

    Google stays in business; therefore, it has to be selling a product to someone. I'm guessing it might be the millions of users of Google Play Store, AdWords, or Nexus products.

    1. Re: Google Play Store sells a product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. Everyone knows that with Google, their product is their users. I'm sure they have Sales Account staffers to assist their customers.

  97. Compile it yourself, if you're paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compile it yourself? It's Free software, isn't it? It's that's too inconvenient for you, surely Debian one you can trust, in their repository. No?

    Huh. You're right. I just typed apt-get install removewat and it didn't work.

    It's almost as though proprietary software is, by its nature, insecure since you never know what's in it and whose interests it was written to serve. Hence the original article, where it turned out that Windows ships with malware.

    So now people are talking about the relative merits of trading one piece of malware for another. Makes you wonder why they bother to install any malware in the first place. If you just have to uninstall it later anyway, how's this not a waste of time?

  98. Speaking of activation problems by BLToday · · Score: 1

    I've ran into this several times now.
    1) Computer craps out because of viruses/malware or dying hard drive.
    2) reinstalled with original recovery disc, usually that's the end of it.

    BUT sometimes
    3) had to enter product key from the outside of the machine, activation fails
    4) calls MSFT, ends up on the phone for about 45 trying to prove that I didn't pirate Windows and they finally gave me a working activation key.

    Have had it happen on emachines, Lenovo and Asus. Never on Dell or HP.

    1. Re:Speaking of activation problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only paying customers have to put up with this crap. The ones who have cracked versions never have this issue... You sound like one of those sad people in an abusive relationship who just won't tell the asshole to GTFO. We're here for you if you need an OS that won't treat you like shit.
      - Concerned Linux Kernel Contributor.

  99. What is this "activation" you speak of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never had to activate my desktop.

      - Satisfied Linux user since 2000.

  100. user error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never once had a problem activating any Microsoft software. Must be user error.

  101. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it's Microsoft's fault that some guy is having trouble with his pirated copy of Windows 8. They should make it easier to pirate their stuff!

  102. You need the proper utility by Nyder · · Score: 1
    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:You need the proper utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, and have a keylogger installed along with my now zombified PC ready to be used by someone at will? Fuck you!

  103. Re:who was he even talking to? by zzsmirkzz · · Score: 1

    The problem is if Windows doesn't know the type of device it can't include its ID's in the machine hash. When the drivers are installed then it does know the device type and its ID's being added to the hash, change the hash. This probably only affects things like the chipset and NICs. However, I agree this is a programmer's error, the hash should not be computed and activation not be allowed if there is still unknown hardware detected, unless the user agrees to a very specific warning about what will happen if they don't install the drivers first.

  104. True moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's 2013, and Cell Phone Calls are Still Frustrating."

    You're blaming Microsoft for a mess you got into because of your phone's poor connectivity. How about blaming the phone companies first?

  105. What an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 was working perfectly fine as was Microsoft's call center, this idiot failed to activate his copy of Windows 8 and had crappy cellphone service, none of which were Microsoft's fault. Baby needs a bottle, and then to buy a Mac since he clearly is too incompetent to use a powerful OS.

    1. Re:What an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot failed to activate his copy of Windows 8

      none of which were Microsoft's fault

      It is Microsoft's fault for even requiring an "activation".

      It is Microsoft's fault for the activation not working automatically.

      It is Microsoft's fault for providing a "free" update that invalidates your key. (Did you even click on the article link? I just skimmed it.)

      But it is also the user's fault for using proprietary software that is controlled by a company and not by the user.

      And from how it sounds he has been *begging* the company for years or so to make their controlling of the software less painful.

  106. SSD space isn't quite so cheap by tepples · · Score: 1

    Disk space is cheap.

    Not on a tablet with a 32 GB SSD, as Surface Pro owners have discovered.

  107. Windows Logo Program by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought Microsoft made drivers available through Windows Update if the device's manufacturer participated in the Windows Logo Program.

  108. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by DrGamez · · Score: 1

    What happens when you call paid support?

    Is it someone just googling your problem for you, or...?

  109. Re:Dump Microsoft by DrGamez · · Score: 1

    If by "fit" you mean, "works worse than any other option" for some of these fixtures. Just look at -any- of the built-in Windows 8 apps and tell me you cannot find a better resource somewhere else, for FREE. Oh an the furniture Windows gives you has ads for... other pieces of furniture in your home.

    This is a dumb metaphor.

  110. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Apple's 'activation' is a hardware check.

    --
    Good-bye
  111. Lessons from Windows 8 Activation by kremvax · · Score: 1

    Here's a quick, entirely true story of a windows 8 activation:

    (Preface: I'm a software developer, and regularly develop under, run, and test with: XP, Win7, OSX, Mint, Ubuntu, etc. I like and use each of these for entirely different reasons.)

    A friend of mine, non-programmer but average to above-average PC and Mac user for more than a decade, bought a new, name-brand, laptop that came with Windows 8 "pre-installed." I was over when she began booting it up for the first time.

    The first boot / install began by asking for wif access, and asking for (unusually personal) mandatory information, phone number, email address, etc. which it then (presumably) validated. I did not see a way to bypass customer information capture, which is possible with every other OS I've had experience with.
      Then it began an install routine, and crashed. We tried twice more, with some sort of connection failure to Microsoft crashing the install each time. On the fourth try, it finally succeeded, and then began an install that required (I believe) at least 3 in-process system reboots.

    Almost an hour later, my friend was "rewarded" with the baffling windows 8 UI. Her reaction was exactly: "Well, it looks like you can go anywhere Microsoft wants you to."

    After nearly an hour of raw frustration, intrusive marketing practices, you get hit with the UI from bizarro-world. And there's no obvious, intuitive way to use it like you would, say, every other computer that you've used in the last twenty years.

    By the time we'd bothered to google for ways to defeat her new laptop's UI and use it like a general purpose computer, my friend had made up her mind.
    She *hated* Windows 8. We returned the computer, stopped by the Apple store on the way home, and picked up a Macbook.
    (She set it up in under 10 minutes, began using it right away, and has been happy with it since.)

    I don't think my friend will ever buy an Windows machine again. And I can't say that I blame her.

    I *still* can't believe Microsoft got something like the first hour of ownership/UX with their OS so completely wrong.

    I remember reading something about Ballmer unilaterally kicking everyone who raised objections to the win8 UI off the team. I guess this is what happens when you fill a bench with yes-men, maybe?

    --
    --- Little Atomo - The Amazing Thinking Robot from Atomocom! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIP9KisHi4k
    1. Re:Lessons from Windows 8 Activation by zyzko · · Score: 1

      Let me guess - Macbook - $1000+, the Win8 PC $500+ with built-in crapware. Win8 installer doesn't require your email or name, just like Mac doesn't. But Windows really, really would like you to register for a Microsoft account, and the Mac really, really would like you to register for an Apple ID.

      I do not defend the crashing installer - customer experience should not be that, but I strongly doubt that all those virus scanner trials and add-on try-before-you buy media players cheap PCs are cramped with do play a role here a manufacturers don't care to test enough.

    2. Re:Lessons from Windows 8 Activation by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Crashing? Sounds like a hardware issue most likely being faulty RAM. I'm not excusing the UI in Windows 8 by any means. It's a content consumption OS, not one built for multi-tasking!!! But regardless, installing Windows 8 on a clean drive is pretty damn straight forward and fast along with the final OOBE user profile setup.

      *Waves hand* I've installed Windows 8 on at least six computers and as a virtual machine to play around with. Honestly, I've never experience the kind of technical problems you've described. Take that POS machine back to the store.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  112. Re:"needs chat support (like most large companies) by sexconker · · Score: 1

    But you're still buying from Microsoft through a third party vendor. If I buy a TV from Best Buy and it has issues, I call Samsung, not Best Buy. With Google, you're not buying a product, period.

    I bought a Nexus One from Google.
    They offered no support.

    I've paid for additional storage from Google.
    They offered no support.

    Etc.

    Google is a useless piece of shit when it comes to support. It's a forum of users complaining about known bugs and Google either completely ignores it or has an intern shit out a "You should be able to fix this by doing this." post (and of course that doesn't fix the problem).

    Hell, I still have deleted entries from my Calendar show up in my phone as if they've been raised from the dead despite Google "fixing" the problem years ago.

  113. Re:who was he even talking to? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    So a bunch of retail box copies from the same store all have pre-used keys and the copy they bought online was completely fine? sounds like someone went through their boxes and stole the keys. No keygen required.

  114. Windows XP and 7 by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Two issues regarding activation I have noticed:

    At least for the WPA edition, Windows 7 requires a BIOS with the "please let Windows 7 work" field present. I have had to update the BIOS on several computers before Windows 7 will activate. Some older computers simply do not have an update that supports this. I have no idea if this is required for editions that use a MAK.

    Windows XP still requires re-activation after a "significant" hardware change such as motherboard or HDD. This is usually done painlessly by the activation client connecting to the Windows activation server. Will this procedure still remain after XP SP3 extended support expires on April 2014? What about new activations? (Arguments about the wisdom of actually running Windows XP beyond this point are not relevant here.)

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  115. Skype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His phone line wasnt connected, claimed that he couldnt call M$, but was online playing mmo's?

    I'm guessing tethered phone, perhaps skype should have been an option...

  116. If you were running XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were running XP, would you still have the same problem?

    Yup.

    If you're running Win8, would you still have the same problem?

    Yup.

    Why?

    Manufacturer wrote device driver
    For SOME Windows OS's. But maybe not yours.

    1. Re:If you were running XP? by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I am not denying that at all, I just stated that Wi-Fi has been a royal bitch on Linux in my experience to the point where I just avoided it instead of bothering to get it working for the most part, and asked if that has changed over the years with the latest hardware. You added nothing. Windows XP wouldn't even recognize the onboard Ethernet adapter on this machine, and I've had countless other devices give me problems in Windows, but again, that's beside the point.

  117. easy to make all in one windows 7 disks by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    easy to make all in one windows 7 disks

    Google ei.cfg

  118. Burning airtime on hold by tepples · · Score: 1

    If he had a laptop or iPhone or android phone or iPad or even Windows phones etc, he could have been a Skype call away from completing his activation for a modest fee.

    How much does a Skype call cost per minute when one may have to wait on hold for sixty?

    1. Re:Burning airtime on hold by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Has anyone actually had to wait on hold that long?

      For the record, toll free numbers are free on Skype. I wasn't sure initially but just checked now and Microsoft's support line is toll free so it would cost him a modest fee of nothing.

    2. Re:Burning airtime on hold by tepples · · Score: 1

      How much does a Skype call cost per minute when one may have to wait on hold for sixty?

      Has anyone actually had to wait on hold that long?

      Please see urbanriot's comment: "So they pass you to another department that has you on hold for a minimum of one hour (not an exaggeration)." Also see MaWeiTao's comment: "The IT guy ends up on the phone with Adobe for almost an hour before he's told that they no longer handle licenses internally."

      For the record, toll free numbers are free on Skype.

      I know you have to verify a unique phone number in order to unlock certain features on a Facebook account. Some people report having to verify a unique phone number in order to log in at all. Do Skype accounts work the same way?

      Besides, he'd first have to have Internet access on his "laptop or iPhone or android phone or iPad or even Windows phones etc" in order to be able to use Skype. From the article:

      my ISP/phone company cannot install my utilities until the 14th

    3. Re:Burning airtime on hold by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I know you have to verify a unique phone number in order to unlock certain features on a Facebook account. Some people report having to verify a unique phone number in order to log in at all. Do Skype accounts work the same way?

      Besides, he'd first have to have Internet access on his "laptop or iPhone or android phone or iPad or even Windows phones etc" in order to be able to use Skype. From the article:

      You can make such calls right away after account creation provided you have credits, and since toll-free calls don't require credits, it works immediately. As for Internet access, I would assume he has some means to the Internet since his apparent first move was to search the Internet for working cracks, such that he managed to try a few before concluding they don't work.

    4. Re:Burning airtime on hold by tepples · · Score: 1

      As for Internet access, I would assume he has some means to the Internet since his apparent first move was to search the Internet for working cracks

      That was likely on a cellular data plan with a low monthly data cap.

    5. Re:Burning airtime on hold by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Well, we'll never know for sure.

  119. Re:who was he even talking to? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

    Could be, but that's not the point. That still be the fault of the activation scheme, not the user being a moron as the OP said in his first sentence.

  120. My legal Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stopped working because of some activation issue ~3 years ago. I haven't bothered re-activating it and have been using openSUSE since.

  121. Good luck with your religion by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    Yes, in fact, it really is your fucking fault. Because you're a bitch, that's why. You simply accept whatever is put around you and don't start complaining until you have to start taking it up the ass, when you should have known very well beforehand that it would happen.

    In short, stop being a coward, take a stand for yourself, and make a bloody effort to fix the damn situation. Sometimes, I have to put in additional upfront work (and sometimes I don't, even), but I never find myself complaining in retrospect.

    You on the other hand, seem to support taking the easy path, even though you know very well that you're putting your fate in your vendors' hands. In other words, you're compromising on yourself, and making the situation worse, not just for you, but for everyone else as a result. Yes, you are entirely at fault for that.

    My mistake. I thought we were having a technical discussion. I didn't realize this was a religious discussion.

    Both Microsoft and Apple look like they are seeking lock in. Apple looks to be far worse to me, but that's beside the point. The tools I need don't exist in Linux or Free BSD. While OS X does have MS Office, Adobe Creative Suite and AutoCAD, it lacks Solidworks and many other tools I need. I can run all those tools on my Win 7 workstation, so that makes it the best choice for my personal workstation. You can argue that some similar tools exist on Linux, but I need those exact applications. That's the reality of the work I do. Arguing otherwise simply demonstrates that you don't understand my industry.

    I run Linux, FreeBSD, OS X, Win server 2008R2 and Windows 7. Once upon a time, all the best CAD and publishing programs ran on Unix workstations. I really like Unix and wish the Unix wars didn't allow Microsoft the opening it needed to get a foothold in the server/workstation OS market. You can blame that on AT&T, Sun, HP, IBM, Digital, and SGI. But you don't, do you?

    But the bottom line is the OS is simply a platform to run my tools and any of them is acceptable as long as I get the job done and meet the demands of my clients. In my world, when my customer requires a Solidworks file, I will be using whatever OS that product run on. If you get that - great. If not, then I hope you get a job with my competitors. Go ahead and hate me. I'm one of the guys that gets things done so you can sit in your mom's basement spewing insults.

    In your religion, you appear to think that you are fighting evil. Good luck with that.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  122. Using sixty minutes of airtime by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why didn't he try the "silly" steps of calling in before attempting cracks?

    Can't call in on a land line or Skype because it isn't the 14th yet: "my ISP/phone company cannot install my utilities until the 14th". Can't call in on a cell phone because using sixty minutes of airtime to wait on hold for sixty minutes (sources: 1 2) can get expensive.

  123. Current edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the author have "Windows 8 Poop" edition installed?

  124. non-compat HW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem I'm facing is my brother's systems, currently running XP, are *not* up to the task of running Win8 (such as no "NX" function in the processor). These are perfectly servicable machines, which run XP, **AND** Linux with no problem at all. From running Win7 on a ThinkPad T23 with 1G of memory (something even older and with even fewer features) was able to run Win7 quite nicely, so I presume my brother's machines would do the same. But MS doesn't want anyone selling Wi7 it seems, since ALL the stores around were told to ship back all their opies of Win7 once Win8 came out. And no, we're not buying new hardware just because MS thinks we should, simply because their developers can't handle the basics of OS programming.

    Sure, there's plenty of questionable copies being sold on feeBay, with most of them being either questionable cracked/hacked/infected copies, or they're selling 500 copies against a 10-copy license. And the "legitimate" sources are selling only selling the grossly overpriced SuperMegaUltra Ultimate Win7 versions. Don't **NEED*** an "Ultimate" version, especially since I'd wile off most of the crapware they bundle with it anyway. Just *how* can they call the only version of Win7 Home they sold "Win7 Home Ultimate"???? How about a cheap (as in $25-30) "Basic" version? Hello??? Bueller????

    It't not like MS has to do extra support work, since they'd have to provide support on Win7 until 2020 anyway. Right now it looks like, once XP support ends, and all the AV, firewall, browser & such tools drop XP support as well, he's just going to have to learn Linux. I've been using Linux as my pimary OS for the last 12 years, he can too.