Alright, Mr Smarty Pants. Was there a major terrorist spectacular at the Super Bowl? Exactly, so the security worked.
(1) There were no arrests for attempted terrorism at the superbowl (2) There were no terrorist attacks anywhere else in the weeks before or after
So, no, the security didn't "work" - there was nothing to stop. In the absence of a real threat, the security should have stopped anybody like these kids.
Who said it was new? What is great about it is that the superbowl was classified as a "Level I National Security Event" - the very tippy-top of Homeland Security's classification system. These are the events they spend beaucoup (but not published) dollars on "securing" from oogy-boogy terrorists.
So, despite all this focus on security and crap, these kids just waltzed on in. Yet more proof of how much of a waste of money DHS's 43 billion dollar budget really is.
> Here is General William G Boykin The former general who is a christian fundamentalist well known for the bug he keeps up his ass about muslims.
> The interview was conducted by a reputable agency, CNS News. Reputable only by the standards of World Net Daily and Rush Limbaugh.
The one thing I know about you is that you don't know any muslims. I see or at least talk to muslims from India, Pakistan and Saudi practically on a daily basis because they are all friends of mine, some going back over 20 years now. Shia, sunni and even sufis. They aren't any different than anyone else and they certainly aren't even remotely like that batshit stuff you keep spewing.
If you have verifiable counter points I'm all ears - but you don't,
You dismissed the gallup poll as "leftist bollocks" - you aren't interested in counter points - you only want to continue jizzing yourself in public because it makes you feel so good to have someone to hate.
The way you use that word shows you don't really understand it at all.
I know exactly what it means. People who constantly fear-monger about teh evil mooslims obviously can't wait for the all-powerful global caliphate to put them in bondage and subject them to all kinds of indignities. It makes them cream their jeans to fantasize about it. This chicken-little schtick isn't a warning to anyone, it is a freaking fantasy, practically an act of public masturbation.
So just quit it with the dhimmi-wannabe stuff, it's gross.
What you linked to doesn't say what you seem to think it says. Just because terrorists operated in Benghazi doesn't mean the US mission there was involved in arming them.
Actually quite the opposite. What I pointed to is a daily list of fatal attacks.
The problem with that list is that it is basically any attack that a muslim has any sort of involvement in. You could make a similar list of attacks by christians around the world, doesn't mean they are doing it because they are christian.
Remember, the BBC has fallen greatly and is no longer an impartial source.
That's not a BBC poll, that's a gallup poll. It is sad how loons like you are so absolutely convinced of your correctness that you are happy to pick and choose your evidence. Furthermore, the Telegraph/ICM poll you cited was mostly about shariah being used for civil disputes exactly the same way jews use beth din courts. It had nothing to with "global sharia" much less jihad rawwwrr!
Well, they already have that with 87 Sharia courts already operating in the UK. It is quite possible that these courts will be extended to non-Muslims
Just like those beth din courts in the UK have been extended to non-jews. You are living in the bubble of dhimmi-wannabees.
The *facts* are that the mainstream of Islam approves and supports jihad and global Sharia (Google for the surveys).
Like this one "Muslims want self-determination, but not an American-imposed and defined democracy. They don't want secularism or theocracy," said the professor of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University in Washington.
"What the majority wants is democracy with religious values."
Ah, one of the great dhimmi-wannabe sites. You know you are dealing with a loon when they whip out web sites like thereligionofpeace.com or jihadwatch.org as sources for reliable "facts."
Other than any specific prayers said over the food, kosher and halal are basically identical. Muslims regularly eat kosher food when officially blessed halal food is not available. It is no big deal.
Or, perhaps he's referring to the confiscation of private citizen's arms during Katrina.
Huh? Either you are pulling a Poe's Law or you are a nutbag. One - confiscation of arms is not the same thing as shooting people and Two - Obama wasn't even president during Hurricane Katrina.
They are free to believe what they want. They are just not free to coerce anyone to join their club.
Show me were the OP said one word about coercion or even conversion? What is it about this topic that brings the nuts out of the woodwork? So many people saying so many things based on the voices in their heads and not the words on the page.
You want me to prove a negative? Extraodrdinary claims require extraordinary proof. You made that crazy-ass claim, but you haven't provided even a shred of proof.
And yet the concept of banning religious doctrine from law is enshrined in the US constitution - he only original part of that document.
And what does that have to do with the price of tea in china? Nobody said anything about separation between church and state. What the AC wrote was outlawing the religious, full stop.
I'm against outlawing speech. I am for outlawing the religious.
So you are actually for outlawing speech then. Seems like whenever someone starts off by saying they are anti-censorship, it really means they are pro-censorship.
Both Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama were opposed to the video to cover up their arming of Al Qaeda elements in Libya through the embassy in Benghazi
Wait, what? Did I read that right? Did you just claim that the US funnelled weapons to an Al Qaeda franchaise through the US consulate in Benghazi? Really? And you got a +5 for that bullshit? Man.
Yet the Govt does not make it illegal for me to have a forge or a CNC machine. Stop fearmongering.
You know that's an over-simplfiication, right?
The government didn't start pushing manufacturers to include secret tracking codes until color laser printers were ubiquitous. CNC machines, casting forges and wax/plastic 3d printers still have a loooong way to go before they are common place enough for in-home gun manufacturing to become a large enough issue for the government to start declaring them contraband.
Met a lot more paranoids at Berkley and Occupy events then I ever did at the shooting ranges.
Since most events as the shooting range aren't political, that really ain't much of a surprise. Go to a tea party rally and see what happens to that count of paranoids.
Self described "Peaceful" and "Tolerant" people are the most intolerant I know.
Yeah, yeah people who disagree with you are hypocrites and people who agree with you are great guys. Oldest self-deception in the book.
Slashdot Mirror
No, dipshit. Baud rates and clock speeds use 1000.
Only bits get dealt with in 1024.
Yeah, those 100mbps ethernet cards are really 100megabaudpersec!!!
Alright, Mr Smarty Pants. Was there a major terrorist spectacular at the Super Bowl?
Exactly, so the security worked.
(1) There were no arrests for attempted terrorism at the superbowl
(2) There were no terrorist attacks anywhere else in the weeks before or after
So, no, the security didn't "work" - there was nothing to stop. In the absence of a real threat, the security should have stopped anybody like these kids.
Because the 1024-based units ARE the true units, and the 1000-based units WERE created just to make hard drives look bigger than they actually were.
And to make network interfaces and cpu frequencies look faster than they actually are too!!!
You just ensured DHS VIPR teams will harass, molest and radiate every person that gets within a block of every Superbowl venue from here on.
Fantastic! The only way the war diginity gets cancelled is if enough people are made to suffer the indiginities of it.
I guess I fail to see how this is new
Who said it was new? What is great about it is that the superbowl was classified as a "Level I National Security Event" - the very tippy-top of Homeland Security's classification system. These are the events they spend beaucoup (but not published) dollars on "securing" from oogy-boogy terrorists.
So, despite all this focus on security and crap, these kids just waltzed on in. Yet more proof of how much of a waste of money DHS's 43 billion dollar budget really is.
So, in order to escape Flash, people should pay hundreds of dollars? I don't think that's really a step up.
Piracy is clearly the way to go here.
> Here is General William G Boykin
The former general who is a christian fundamentalist well known for the bug he keeps up his ass about muslims.
> The interview was conducted by a reputable agency, CNS News.
Reputable only by the standards of World Net Daily and Rush Limbaugh.
The one thing I know about you is that you don't know any muslims. I see or at least talk to muslims from India, Pakistan and Saudi practically on a daily basis because they are all friends of mine, some going back over 20 years now. Shia, sunni and even sufis. They aren't any different than anyone else and they certainly aren't even remotely like that batshit stuff you keep spewing.
If you have verifiable counter points I'm all ears - but you don't,
You dismissed the gallup poll as "leftist bollocks" - you aren't interested in counter points - you only want to continue jizzing yourself in public because it makes you feel so good to have someone to hate.
The way you use that word shows you don't really understand it at all.
I know exactly what it means. People who constantly fear-monger about teh evil mooslims obviously can't wait for the all-powerful global caliphate to put them in bondage and subject them to all kinds of indignities. It makes them cream their jeans to fantasize about it. This chicken-little schtick isn't a warning to anyone, it is a freaking fantasy, practically an act of public masturbation.
So just quit it with the dhimmi-wannabe stuff, it's gross.
If you enable WebGL on Google Maps, I'm almost certain that the streetview is WebGL too, not flash.
I can't find that setting. Do I have to create a google account and sign in to get that option?
What you linked to doesn't say what you seem to think it says. Just because terrorists operated in Benghazi doesn't mean the US mission there was involved in arming them.
Actually quite the opposite. What I pointed to is a daily list of fatal attacks.
The problem with that list is that it is basically any attack that a muslim has any sort of involvement in. You could make a similar list of attacks by christians around the world, doesn't mean they are doing it because they are christian.
Remember, the BBC has fallen greatly and is no longer an impartial source.
That's not a BBC poll, that's a gallup poll. It is sad how loons like you are so absolutely convinced of your correctness that you are happy to pick and choose your evidence. Furthermore, the Telegraph/ICM poll you cited was mostly about shariah being used for civil disputes exactly the same way jews use beth din courts. It had nothing to with "global sharia" much less jihad rawwwrr!
Well, they already have that with 87 Sharia courts already operating in the UK. It is quite possible that these courts will be extended to non-Muslims
Just like those beth din courts in the UK have been extended to non-jews. You are living in the bubble of dhimmi-wannabees.
Streetview on Google Maps needs flash. I would miss that quite a bit.
The *facts* are that the mainstream of Islam approves and supports jihad and global Sharia (Google for the surveys).
Like this one
"Muslims want self-determination, but not an American-imposed and defined democracy. They don't want secularism or theocracy," said the professor of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University in Washington.
"What the majority wants is democracy with religious values."
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks
Ah, one of the great dhimmi-wannabe sites. You know you are dealing with a loon when they whip out web sites like thereligionofpeace.com or jihadwatch.org as sources for reliable "facts."
Don't you mean "halal"?
Other than any specific prayers said over the food, kosher and halal are basically identical. Muslims regularly eat kosher food when officially blessed halal food is not available. It is no big deal.
Or, perhaps he's referring to the confiscation of private citizen's arms during Katrina.
Huh? Either you are pulling a Poe's Law or you are a nutbag. One - confiscation of arms is not the same thing as shooting people and Two - Obama wasn't even president during Hurricane Katrina.
They are free to believe what they want. They are just not free to coerce anyone to join their club.
Show me were the OP said one word about coercion or even conversion? What is it about this topic that brings the nuts out of the woodwork? So many people saying so many things based on the voices in their heads and not the words on the page.
Dumbasses like you give athiests a bad name.
What facts do you have to oppose this?
You want me to prove a negative? Extraodrdinary claims require extraordinary proof. You made that crazy-ass claim, but you haven't provided even a shred of proof.
And yet the concept of banning religious doctrine from law is enshrined in the US constitution - he only original part of that document.
And what does that have to do with the price of tea in china? Nobody said anything about separation between church and state. What the AC wrote was outlawing the religious, full stop.
I'm against outlawing speech. I am for outlawing the religious.
So you are actually for outlawing speech then. Seems like whenever someone starts off by saying they are anti-censorship, it really means they are pro-censorship.
Both Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama were opposed to the video to cover up their arming of Al Qaeda elements in Libya through the embassy in Benghazi
Wait, what? Did I read that right? Did you just claim that the US funnelled weapons to an Al Qaeda franchaise through the US consulate in Benghazi? Really? And you got a +5 for that bullshit? Man.
My problem is that you can't follow your own logic.
No, your logic was broken to begin with.
You equated non-political people on the range with political people at an occupy event.
Show me something that even compares to the rape, destruction, and general mayhem of the Occupy events.
So now you are equating "rape, destruction and general mayhem" with the shooting range? WTF is your problem?
Yet the Govt does not make it illegal for me to have a forge or a CNC machine. Stop fearmongering.
You know that's an over-simplfiication, right?
The government didn't start pushing manufacturers to include secret tracking codes until color laser printers were ubiquitous. CNC machines, casting forges and wax/plastic 3d printers still have a loooong way to go before they are common place enough for in-home gun manufacturing to become a large enough issue for the government to start declaring them contraband.
Met a lot more paranoids at Berkley and Occupy events then I ever did at the shooting ranges.
Since most events as the shooting range aren't political, that really ain't much of a surprise. Go to a tea party rally and see what happens to that count of paranoids.
Self described "Peaceful" and "Tolerant" people are the most intolerant I know.
Yeah, yeah people who disagree with you are hypocrites and people who agree with you are great guys. Oldest self-deception in the book.