What I wonder is, if encryption can be 'instantly broken,' does this also mean that remaining crypto-coins can be instantly discovered?
This could theoretically be the biggest breakthrough in computing since transistors, and this person is wondering about how it's going to affect Monopoly money? Jesus.
It's really no big deal. What other data could they possibly collect that they don't have already? They have your location at every second of the day. They have all of your contacts. They have all of your emails and text messages. What else could they get that they don't have, already?
I'm not a pod person. I haven't been absorbed into the Apple financial/mindfuck system. I have no idea what a "notch" has to do with a smartphone. Can somebody provide a link to what these pod people are talking about?
I haven't found anything that comes close to Outlook (on the desktop... not the web). I use it with Exchange and IMAP accounts at the same time. Lots of features, and even more with Exchange accounts.
No. It's called having a moral compass, you stupid, stupid fuck. They're giving up lucrative jobs so that they don't participate in building weapons. It's the exact opposite of "virtue signalling". They're putting their money where their mouths are.
You're right. They're free to work where ever they want to, but to call them phonies for quitting a weapon company makes you a complete and total asshole. You would have happily been a Nazi because, "hey, opposing them is futile.". If the world were made up of people who all agreed with you, the human race would be extinct, already.
Microsoft's long history makes them untrustworthy. I think we should be very skeptical of relying on any technology out of Redmond, and view it as a potential trap.
A "trap"? In what sense? Are you describing a movie, perhaps?
It doesn't have to be that way. The people making billions of dollars off of GNU should always be reminded who wrote that software. If they don't like silly comments, they can re-write their own code.
You should learn to think. That link just lists a bunch of lawsuits against PP. None of the stuff on that page has been verified by any authority, as far as I can tell.
Yes. It'll make it incredibly simple to fish not only Gmail "users", but also people who receive email from Gmail "users". If this is implemented, I'll just set our mail servers to send all of these messages straight to the trash.
Slashdot Mirror
This doesn't make any sense. Facebook doesn't have a monopoly on anything.
"selfish" was the word I was going for, obviously.
In the US, the most important thing is money. Laws that hinder any sort of business, in any sort of way, are anti-American.
I call it being a self asshole. But hey, tomato/tomato, right?
You're naive if you think that not shopping at Amazon is going to make a difference.
That's a wonderful attitude to have. You probably don't vote, either, do you?
What I wonder is, if encryption can be 'instantly broken,' does this also mean that remaining crypto-coins can be instantly discovered?
This could theoretically be the biggest breakthrough in computing since transistors, and this person is wondering about how it's going to affect Monopoly money? Jesus.
Go suck on a tailpipe.
It's really no big deal. What other data could they possibly collect that they don't have already? They have your location at every second of the day. They have all of your contacts. They have all of your emails and text messages. What else could they get that they don't have, already?
You're exactly right. I use one of those less popular routers, and I don't even want to say what brand they are.
It artificially makes everything expensive
Except for healthcare and education, right? Those are just a bit less expensive, I've heard.
Fuck Amazon. Let 'em leave.
You can go outside in the dark, too, believe it or not. I do!
I don't know what you're talking about. We've been on Exchange/Outlook for about a decade, and have never seen what you're describing.
I'm not a pod person. I haven't been absorbed into the Apple financial/mindfuck system. I have no idea what a "notch" has to do with a smartphone. Can somebody provide a link to what these pod people are talking about?
I haven't found anything that comes close to Outlook (on the desktop... not the web). I use it with Exchange and IMAP accounts at the same time. Lots of features, and even more with Exchange accounts.
Its meaningless virtue signaling
No. It's called having a moral compass, you stupid, stupid fuck. They're giving up lucrative jobs so that they don't participate in building weapons. It's the exact opposite of "virtue signalling". They're putting their money where their mouths are.
You're right. They're free to work where ever they want to, but to call them phonies for quitting a weapon company makes you a complete and total asshole. You would have happily been a Nazi because, "hey, opposing them is futile.". If the world were made up of people who all agreed with you, the human race would be extinct, already.
Go fuck yourself.
You have to own a Google or Apple data collecting device to use scooter renting services? Yeah, no thanks. I'll just walk.
The use case is an idiot detector.
Microsoft's long history makes them untrustworthy. I think we should be very skeptical of relying on any technology out of Redmond, and view it as a potential trap.
A "trap"? In what sense? Are you describing a movie, perhaps?
You're a nutter.
He took half of the employees who are supposed to be building the Tesla 3's and made them dig this silly hole, instead.
Why should we "just say no", exactly? What's wrong with agreeing to reduce pollution?
It doesn't have to be that way. The people making billions of dollars off of GNU should always be reminded who wrote that software. If they don't like silly comments, they can re-write their own code.
You should learn to think. That link just lists a bunch of lawsuits against PP. None of the stuff on that page has been verified by any authority, as far as I can tell.
Yes. It'll make it incredibly simple to fish not only Gmail "users", but also people who receive email from Gmail "users". If this is implemented, I'll just set our mail servers to send all of these messages straight to the trash.