I doubt Apple will ever get Maps to the quality as Google Maps is Google Maps is utter shit. Especially when it comes to public transport... Just to many clicks and stupid UI and in the end half of the information is wrong.
On the App, google maps does not even include a scale. So you can not judge as a pedestrian how far stuff is away, you have to plot a route, ha ha ha!
Both Google and Apple have interesting spots wrong. It simply is a no go if a "Starbucks" is 300 or 400 yards off position (in Paris the rule, and in Frankfurt, too)
Of course the interest of my partner and me and our employer does align. You simply assume that there are conflicts were there are none.
There is also the appearance of impropriety, which continues to exist even when you and your partner behave in an otherwise professional manner. Strange that most countries workers see that different.
This "conflict of interest thing" seems to be an anglo saxon thing. As I said in other answers: it is pretty common that people meet at work and marry, about 30% of the German couples meet at work. It is pretty common that married couples work in the same organization and even close to each other. Prime example: schools where both are teachers, hospitals where one is a doctor and one a nurser.
That appearance alone can be destructive to a team and to reputations. If it is abused. And if it is abused it is prosecuted anyway.
Many steel plants already use induction furnaces for for melt processes, but the addition of coke to remove impurities is a required part of the process. Using induction heating with a much smaller carbon injection reduces the footprint from steel production, That is complete nonsense.
Either you make steel from ore, then you need coke. Or you recycle already made steel, then you don't need coke.
The "dark ages" are called like that because we lack written information/history about them. There was nothing particular "dark" during the migration times.
The Pars agreement was nothing more than a attempt to grab money from developed countries, while forcing them to hobble their economies at the same time. And how exactly would that be? The treaty (which is not binding in the US) forces the US to build solar plants for China in China? Hu? Are you really that retarded?
by renewables has pretty much been canceled out [latimes.com] by the reduction in nuclear power, That is nonsense. Where should those nuclear power plants be?
A warhead is a thing with an explosive device inside, distributing its payload over a huge area. A paper envelope, even with an explosive inside, is not a war head.
Someone is making your employees and other customers uncomfortable? That's enough. Of course that is enough. But it needs to be "obvious" as in "somewhat objective".
You can not point someone out because you don't like his nose.
They actually have: you stab one with the edge of the blade pointing down it is "criminal assault", if the edge points upward it is attempted murder. If the victim is dead, it is murder. But I guess, that is not what you meant.
leniency The guy most certainly gets the death sentence. And in Japan they have the habit that the date is not "defined" or "made public". That means, you can be dragged out of your cell at a random point in time and get executed. However that is usually a few decades, and you have a chance to either die in prison or even get pardoned after 30 or more years.
Depends on jurisdictation. You can not throw out random people in my country, you need a solid reason. After all you offer a service/contract and by sitting down the "guest" agrees to follow the contract, and that means: you have a contract.
that the moral rights belong to someone other than the natural person who created the work You mix up copyright with moral rights. The moral rights _always_ stay with the creator.
Again: you miss the point which I pointed out now several times: it is a question of your contract, not a question of law. Your contract can define that your work outside of your working hours fall under copyright of your employer (you retain moral rights). However if he wants to claim it, he has to compensate you for the work hours and/or expected profit.
I did not read your links yet (as I don't speak spanish, and reading is a bit tough but I will manage): in Germany the law is, unions and commerce agree on contracts, which are binding. No change to law necessary. In other words: the law already says "if you agree to something, stick to it", no one is going to make a law after such an agreement. How should that work anyway? Laws are made by the parliament, how do you want to force it to make a law they don't like but is a mirror of an agreement between a union and an center of commerce?
Union and center of commerce contracts are not converted into law, why would they? A contract between a union and part of the industries is enough.
a personal project is clearly not work for hire But the employer reserves the right to convert it into a project for hire and has the rights to use it if he compensates you accordingly AND if it is written in your work contract. You probably missed that part of my argument.
Slashdot Mirror
I doubt Apple will ever get Maps to the quality as Google Maps is ...
Google Maps is utter shit.
Especially when it comes to public transport
Just to many clicks and stupid UI and in the end half of the information is wrong.
On the App, google maps does not even include a scale.
So you can not judge as a pedestrian how far stuff is away, you have to plot a route, ha ha ha!
Both Google and Apple have interesting spots wrong. It simply is a no go if a "Starbucks" is 300 or 400 yards off position (in Paris the rule, and in Frankfurt, too)
Of course the interest of my partner and me and our employer does align.
You simply assume that there are conflicts were there are none.
There is also the appearance of impropriety, which continues to exist even when you and your partner behave in an otherwise professional manner.
Strange that most countries workers see that different.
This "conflict of interest thing" seems to be an anglo saxon thing. As I said in other answers: it is pretty common that people meet at work and marry, about 30% of the German couples meet at work. It is pretty common that married couples work in the same organization and even close to each other. Prime example: schools where both are teachers, hospitals where one is a doctor and one a nurser.
That appearance alone can be destructive to a team and to reputations. If it is abused. And if it is abused it is prosecuted anyway.
Then you can as well use wind or solar power ... obviously.
And it is cheaper and more safe, too, obviously.
Seems I mixed up "The House of Representatives" with Congress, does not change the fact that the parent was wrong.
A typical retard answer.
A baseless claim and now a baseless defense.
Many steel plants already use induction furnaces for for melt processes, but the addition of coke to remove impurities is a required part of the process. Using induction heating with a much smaller carbon injection reduces the footprint from steel production,
That is complete nonsense.
Either you make steel from ore, then you need coke.
Or you recycle already made steel, then you don't need coke.
There is no middle ground.
The "dark ages" are called like that because we lack written information/history about them.
There was nothing particular "dark" during the migration times.
How do you want to power an airplane with nukes? Safely?
The Pars agreement was nothing more than a attempt to grab money from developed countries, while forcing them to hobble their economies at the same time.
And how exactly would that be? The treaty (which is not binding in the US) forces the US to build solar plants for China in China? Hu? Are you really that retarded?
You seem to mix up Senate with Congress, or you are bad in quoting.
by renewables has pretty much been canceled out [latimes.com] by the reduction in nuclear power,
That is nonsense.
Where should those nuclear power plants be?
A warhead is a thing with an explosive device inside, distributing its payload over a huge area.
A paper envelope, even with an explosive inside, is not a war head.
Thanks for nitpicking, idiot.
Someone is making your employees and other customers uncomfortable? That's enough.
Of course that is enough. But it needs to be "obvious" as in "somewhat objective".
You can not point someone out because you don't like his nose.
They actually have: you stab one with the edge of the blade pointing down it is "criminal assault", if the edge points upward it is attempted murder. If the victim is dead, it is murder.
But I guess, that is not what you meant.
The story was about a guy entering through the door.
You take a broom, fire iron, baseball bat etc. p.p. to defend against him.
No gun or knife needed ...
Killed "by elevator" most likely does not mean killed "inside of an elevator".
In a civilized country you can wash before a "mug shot".
In a civilized country you don't risk injury if you enter a police station.
leniency
The guy most certainly gets the death sentence.
And in Japan they have the habit that the date is not "defined" or "made public".
That means, you can be dragged out of your cell at a random point in time and get executed.
However that is usually a few decades, and you have a chance to either die in prison or even get pardoned after 30 or more years.
Depends on jurisdictation.
You can not throw out random people in my country, you need a solid reason.
After all you offer a service/contract and by sitting down the "guest" agrees to follow the contract, and that means: you have a contract.
Why did some asshole mod this "troll"?
that the moral rights belong to someone other than the natural person who created the work
You mix up copyright with moral rights.
The moral rights _always_ stay with the creator.
Again: you miss the point which I pointed out now several times: it is a question of your contract, not a question of law. Your contract can define that your work outside of your working hours fall under copyright of your employer (you retain moral rights). However if he wants to claim it, he has to compensate you for the work hours and/or expected profit.
I did not read your links yet (as I don't speak spanish, and reading is a bit tough but I will manage): in Germany the law is, unions and commerce agree on contracts, which are binding. No change to law necessary. In other words: the law already says "if you agree to something, stick to it", no one is going to make a law after such an agreement. How should that work anyway? Laws are made by the parliament, how do you want to force it to make a law they don't like but is a mirror of an agreement between a union and an center of commerce?
Any links for that "tree count thing"? Would be interesting!
Union and center of commerce contracts are not converted into law, why would they?
A contract between a union and part of the industries is enough.
a personal project is clearly not work for hire
But the employer reserves the right to convert it into a project for hire and has the rights to use it if he compensates you accordingly AND if it is written in your work contract. You probably missed that part of my argument.
It is the exact same thing.
The methane would otherwise be produced by the rotting plants you did not eat ....