Slashdot Mirror
America's Chipmakers Go To War vs. China (axios.com)
Chinese raids of U.S. intellectual property have helped China build a solid high-tech economy. But the U.S. semiconductor industry is still far ahead -- and China is desperate to catch up. From a report: Semiconductor manufacturers are fighting to protect IP from the Chinese, fearing that, without coherent action from the Trump administration, Beijing could bulldoze their industries. Three weeks ago, Micron and South Korean chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix all reported that the Chinese government had launched antitrust probes into their firms, and accused them of setting artificially high prices for memory chips. American companies and the U.S. government have long been suspicious about the link between China's anti-monopoly policies and its industrial goals. "They want access to the intellectual property. They need us to teach them how to do it. Once they have the industry, they want to push us out," an industry source familiar with China's investigation into Micron tells Axios. The price hikes, the source says, are largely due to a boom in demand for memory chips in everything from smartphones to autonomous vehicles. China's investigation is "a clear indication that they're not ready to make [semiconductors] work," says the source. The New York Times has a story which also details the lawsuit of how a Fujian govt-backed chipmaker allegedly stole secrets from Micron. Then Micron got sued for patent infringement in Fujian.
Or as the Times reporter describes it, "This is how you lose a major tech company. First, a Beijing-backed buyout offer. Then friendly Chinese partnership proposals. Then the tech gets stolen. Then when you file a complaint in court, you get hit with investigations in China, your biggest market."
Or as the Times reporter describes it, "This is how you lose a major tech company. First, a Beijing-backed buyout offer. Then friendly Chinese partnership proposals. Then the tech gets stolen. Then when you file a complaint in court, you get hit with investigations in China, your biggest market."
>> Once they have the industry, they want to push us out
This is news? I remember visiting a couple of mid-to-high tech companies doing business in China ten years ago and every company was structured the same way: the one or two foreigners running the plant and the hundreds or thousands of local Chinese doing everything.
If chipmakers don't like the way China works...why not try building elsewhere instead of whining about industry protections aimed at a specific country (that screw up things for lots of other people)?
And just how much of this IP drain was due to outsourcing?
The DDR memory carter is trying to yet again shift our attention from their price fixing scandals. They have been found out and punished time and time again yet it is still a profitable business practice from them. What are fines in $millions when the benefit of the price fixing is in $billions...
This is capitalism's Achilles Heel. Businesses are run on short term thinking. Sure your trade secrets are going to get stolen and they are going to use your tech to kick you out of there market in two years, but don't you want to do business in China today? Selling in the Chinese market will increase your stock price next quarter.
Nevertheless, in the long term (multigenerational term), it doesn't matter, they are going to figure it out for themselves one way or the other anyway.
Somehow I don't think it's going to work. When I was starting out, I needed a very simple board made. No assembly, just the board, around 1 inch by 2 inch (25mm x 50mm), with about 10 or so parts that I'd install later. So my first task was to price out fabrication companies to print/etch the board for me.
The cheapest US based-company wanted $200 PER BOARD.
China-based companies wanted between $10 and $25 for a 10-pack of boards.
It may be entirely true that the China was under-priced to "sneak peeks" at what was being made, but there was no justification for that cost from the US company. There's no possible way a 10-part 2 square inch hobbyist board should cost as much to produce as a mid to high-end PC motherboard.
Reminds me of that old saying about "lying down with dogs, waking up with fleas". Just what exactly did they expect to happen? Also we're not much better with companies buying off other companies employees.
then employ americans and dont outsource and subsidize stem subjects in education
Many will die in the intel vs jinhua wars.
The US gov like it that way going back to the 1970's when the USA split China from close deals with the Soviet Union.
For that to work China got a lot of US tech for free. US brands got invited into China. Low tax, low wages. Production lines that could make a profit with every generation of tech.
The only trick was the USA would have to transfer the tech production methods so the new factories in China could make the most profit.
To share everything the US brand had created with a local partner in a Communist nation.
No tech transfer, no production line. The US brands opted to invest in 1970-80's China rather that much more secure and pro US nations with the same wages.
Now China understands the US tech it wants to export everything under its own Communist brands at full price to the world.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
apple can pull out foxcon has lots of land in WI build Iphones in the usa!
trump is right the China deal is bad for the USA!
the tech for fab is a moving target, and we're right at the point where new tech is needed to go with any finer feature pitch. China will only be able to play catch-up
Make it free in the rest of the world also.
IP is outdated anyway.
Abolish patents.
aaaaaaa
They are referring to IC's not finished consumer products. There is a huge amount of IP related to the highest-tech integrated circuits. In many cases, such as Intel, they were able to out-accelerate many competitors because they were not only developing new designs for the processors themselves, but they were also developing cutting edge design tools and processes along with them to keep innovation moving.
That's a huge stumbling block if you're a smaller firm just trying to jump into the ring with a big player.
Been in the industry for a long time and this was always an obvious end result. It's cheaper to have China do your stuff, so you give them access to all your IP and then complain when your IP makes the rounds. Tough shit. Should have paid your workers instead of giving your CEO a 10 million dollar annual salary.
There is no way you're this dumb and yet posting on slashdot unless someone paid you. I can make a transistor at home out of toothpaste but I could never dependably build much out of them because they're crude and inconsistent.
I might be able to litho a primitive IC but I can't make a 10nm wafer and I certainly couldn't design and arrange it's components with the efficiency of intel or AMD
I have no idea why you made this post or who paid you. Are the Chinese paying you?
I would feel sorry for a small company who just doesn't have the resources to fully understand what is the cost of doing business in china. And got excited by the low price in partitioning. But for the big companies, with a lot to loose if they don't realize that there isn't a separation between business in government in china, and IP will be acquired if deemed necessary for national self interest.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Step 1: Be in charge of a major corporation.
Step 2: Outsource all the jobs overseas.
Step 3: Cry when the third world shithole you outsourced the corporation to takes your job.
As a non-American I will buy products from whoever gives the the best value for money. Right now, thanks to low wages and the ability to produce quality goods at a low price, China is winning that battle. If I buy an American product then I'm basically paying extra so some fat kid in the US with high wage expectations can have a fancier life, not to get a good product.
Do you remember when 10 years ago chinese brought their SUVs in Europe to sell them and EuroNCAP rated them with one star?
Do you remember when 2 years ago the chinese brought their sedan in Europe to sell it and EuroNCAP rated it 5 out of 5 stars?
The Chinese have great potential to become great, but their gov't held them back. American and European outsourcing gave them the wings to gain the know-how and since they have the means of production, they are now competing in every aspect since they can be more effective than some six figure "designers" designing in California.
Indians have almost zero potential and even after hundreds of years they won't be able to become self aware, like the Chinese... but now it's to late.
then employ americans and dont outsource and subsidize stem subjects in education
Consumers decide where things are made, not CEOs. A lower manufacturing cost is only relevant if you are getting the sale in the first place and consumers decide who gets the sale. Consumers rewarded those first CEOs that outsourced with sales, so other CEOs got the message and followed. The message: we consumers don't care where things are made we just want lower prices. Its a tragedy of the commons thing. The individual consumer thinks there one decision will have no impact. But millions are thinking the same thing, let this go on for decades, we now see the result.
Things will not change until **consumers** change their behavior and show a preference for US made goods.
The CIA and MI6 assured the US government that freedom would spread quickly and fully all over China in the 1980's.
That free trade would change China and that democracy would move into China under the cover of free trade.
The West invested fully and China simply took the tech for free.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Like Solar. Anybody who built their own plants lost due to Chinese subsidies and building too cheap for anybody else to compete.
What You Sow, So Shall You Reap.
IIRC, most semiconductors are not manufactured in China. The two biggest fab locations are either Taiwan (technically not China by Western standards) or the US...
This is capitalism's Achilles Heel. Businesses are run on short term thinking.
This is also short term US consumer thinking, a tragedy of the commons thing. Lowering your manufacturing cost is a secondary consideration, the primary consideration is getting the sale in the first place. Consumers drove jobs overseas by rewarding CEOs who outsource with sales. Consumers thought their one little purchase would not make a difference. Multiply by hundreds of millions of consumers, now multiply by many decades.
There is also short term US/State government thinking. For example the San Francisco bay area buying Chinese steel for a recent bridge project.
Yes managing companies for the quarterly report is bad and needs to change. But you have to have a company to manage in the first place and consumes will generally reward your competitors if you manufacture in the US and they manufacture overseas. Consumers need to change their purchasing habits and show companies they have a preference for US made goods, that is the only way that things will change.
China used an idea I implemented before 'em http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/ & "IMITATION's SINCEREST form of FLATTERY" + industrial/military espionage vs. the USA!
* As DNS has more security issues lately https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/google-roku-sonos-to-fix-dns-rebinding-attack-vector/
APK
P.S.=> MORE speed/security/reliability/anonymity & natively + LESS resource use or complexity leading to exploit (doing more vs. ANY 1 "so-called" buggy security issue laden (DNS/AntiVir) inefficient/crippled (addons 'souled-out' to advertisers to NOT do the 1 job they have) inferior (firewall filter driver overhead & most work on IP& most threats use hostnames) SLOWER (ALL vs. hosts speedup 2 ways in adblocking + hardcoded favs & avoids DNS tracking too) "so-called 'competitor'")= APK Hosts File Engine https://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12252144&cid=56816690/
These companies were busted price fixing DRAM back in 2002, and they're at it again. Prices aren't 200-300% higher (for the EXACT same products) than what they were a few years ago because of high demand. If that were the case, we'd be seeing a shortage of RAM, and you can't swing a dead cat on Newegg.com without knocking over a box of DDR4. No, the same companies that fucked over their customers two decades ago are giving it another shot, and now they're crying because the Chinese government's enormous wang is getting a little too close to their own assholes for their liking. Maybe if they hadn't been greedily lubing up their customers backsides for profit, they wouldn't be in this position. I hope you fuckers enjoy your Kung Pao flavored bureaucratic suppository.
Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017
(APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015
I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015
I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017
I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017
* See subject: Best part's the Linux 64-bit model's faster & more efficient (does 2x the work in 1/2 the time)
APK
P.S.=> Enjoy a faster/safer/more reliable internet... apk
1970's? I remember when it was wellknown that all what the Japanese did was copy everything and made bad copies on top of that. Plenty a joke of the Japanese coming to Europe and the US to take pictures of every factory and product but not buy anything.
After that the copies became better and later they where the ones that where being copied. They became the leader in many products, especially electronics.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
I am not a fan of the Chinese government, but is everyone convinced that there is not price fixing going on? There was already one instance of a memory cartel that artificially kept prices high. I was thinking just last year that it seems like DDR4 RAM is higher priced than I expected. Perhaps the memory industry (which is misleading because this may be talking about non-DRAM memory) should stop price gouging whenever they get the chance.
Maybe the industries impacted by China, which is not limited to technology industries, should band together and effectively unionize to force an international restraint from China and otherwise blockade the garbage heap of a culture that finds it completely acceptable to steal anything, and produce toxic foods, because it's okay if the other person falls for it.
That's just a transfer of wealth—a redistribution, if you like.
No wonder the Commies never changed.
Resulted in its formation of the country. USA has like the worst record when it comes to stealing..
I suspect Iraq still has WMDs too.
Don't they have any real evidences to present?
While at it, we should also suspect Huawei put backdoors in their products, just like the Chinese suspect the same about Cisco products... (oh... never mind the second one, just remember Snowden now)
BTW another American semiconductor company -- Qualcomm -- already paid up $1 billion to settle its Chinese antitrust violation. So pay up Micron.
Capitalists are forced to face reality eventually, unlike governmental bureaucrats who will violently run a society into the ground while pursuing their irrational fantasies.
The US gov like it that way going back to the 1970's when the USA split China from close deals with the Soviet Union. For that to work China got a lot of US tech for free. US brands got invited into China. Low tax, low wages. Production lines that could make a profit with every generation of tech. The only trick was the USA would have to transfer the tech production methods so the new factories in China could make the most profit. To share everything the US brand had created with a local partner in a Communist nation. No tech transfer, no production line. The US brands opted to invest in 1970-80's China rather that much more secure and pro US nations with the same wages. Now China understands the US tech it wants to export everything under its own Communist brands at full price to the world.
That these forced technology transfers hasn't been fought is a complete failure, and treason, of our government. Firing squads for all involved, including tho WTO.
Is China the new Microsoft?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish
The solution could be to become the new Autodesk? Or the new Linux? Or what else? ^_^;;;
CYA
The average Chinese contract manufacturer makes about a 1% profit selling to the west. They more or less have to cheat and sell additional production in China which gets exported 'informally'.
Full price for cheap knockoffs is already in the market, the Chinese are way behind in moving up the value curve. By this number of years the Japanese already owned the world camera market and were starting to own the car market.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Taiwan is not part of the PRC, by anybodies standards.
Yes the Chinese are butthurt about this. Too bad for them.
Taiwan has chemical and biological weapons. The situation isn't going to change anytime soon.
Perhaps after the next revolution on the mainland. When they realize they've been taken for chumps and all the assets they worked 30 years for are worth much much less than they paid for them.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Donald Trump IS J.R. Bob Dobbs!
You can't do business in China without sharing your IP with the government. Everything is fair game for them. Their supercomputers are based on MIPS technology with questionable intellectual property licensing. Now they're moving to "license" AMD x86-64 technology.
Kriston
You are not competing with a Chinese company. You are competing with China.
Your competitor writes and enforces the laws as they wish.
My first reference (to date myself) for the obsessive behavior of Japanese photographers is Caddyshack and their heady presence was led by a fully aware Rodney Dangerfield in his audacity to taunt and diminish propertied snobbery.
Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
Reminds me of that old saying about "lying down with dogs, waking up with fleas". Just what exactly did they expect to happen? Also we're not much better with companies buying off other companies employees.
Sure, except the companies being discussed here are the ones that actually continued to invest in US manufacturing. That's why they are being pressured here. So most of the comments to this article, like yours, are actually about a completely different subject.
Both of those things can be true. The Chinese probably want access to corporate secrets, but chipmakers are probably price fixing as well. They have a history of it, and itâ(TM)s the only tech sector where price/performance costs are rising rather than falling. Memory costs more than double what it did five years ago. Itâ(TM)s insane. Sure, thereâ(TM)s rising demand for memory, but thereâ(TM)s higher demand for processors as well, and you donâ(TM)t see processor prices rising. If chipmakers arenâ(TM)t colluding to keep memory prices artificially high and trying to deflect attention with stories like this, Iâ(TM)ll eat my hat. Besides, China has great espionage â" they hardly need fake investigations to get access to corporate secrets.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
The West invested fully and China simply took the tech for free.
And what did we get in return? Mountains of affordable consumer goods at every big-box store.
Was it worth the trade? That's an undecidable matter of opinion, but let's not pretend the benefits only went in one direction.
I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
The Chinese own the drone market, and are starting to own the smartphone market.
I think South Korea is also in the top 3 with Samsung and Hynix.
Taiwan has chemical and biological weapons.
I doubt that. Officially no developed country still has them, we have treaties against that since 30 years.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Actually, no. It was the GOP that stated that, specifically, reagan. CIA and MI6 NEVER said that it was certain.
Oddly, GOP members continue to make huge profits, while screwing over America. Trump has multiple times made accusations against China, and then backed off once his family got trademarks, assorted IP, and promises of the Chinese gov buying millions from him directly.
While I suspect that Taiwan does NOT have bio-chem weapons, most nations around the globe do in fact have these. They are very cheap to make, effective, and most of all, untraceable if you know what you are doing. If fact, if you really know what you are doing, you can point the path at another nation.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
The simple fact that this has already happened, for low end chips. Sure, if you want some fancy x86 thing, a server chip, or a computer chip you are going to need to license a expensive design.
But for everything else that is used? If your local manufacture plants also make computer chips, you could get anything for small electronics. Anything for anything that doesn't require a real OS: So your idea is basically true for all embedded systems, which is still quoted at "98% of microprocessors".
Currently any medium size enterprise can basically get any known expired design, and do a test run, and then use it. And it happens.
But by this revealing statement, the next puzzle arrive: Will the trends thats true for the embedded systems ever be true for things like workstation CPUs?
If you think they don't, then surely they must.
They were found and this has been noted several times. However, since it vindicates a republican, it is simply not accepted by many on these forums.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2014/10/16/new-york-times-reports-wmd-found-in-iraq
By this number of years the Japanese already owned the world camera market and were starting to own the car market.
So Japan was forced to open ports by Commodore Perry in 1854.
China is coming up to its 70 anniversary in 2019, and joined the world economy for less than 50 years.
You're saying by 1904, japan had "already owned the world camera market and were starting to own the car market"?
I believe the Ford Model T debuted in model year 1909, that makes Henry Ford a slimy copycat weaboo?
True idiocy is living by virtue signaling. It robs you of your natural intelligence and logic. You would be far better in life to purge the immature parts of yourself that says things like "Trump is an idiot, but..." You might want to start evaluating people and ideologies issue by issue. You will find that some of what you just accepted as fact was untrue, that people are complicated and not cookie cutter heroes and villains, and that issues are seldom as simple as they seem. When you achieve this, the world makes more sense, and TBH, it becomes far more interesting. You are on the verge of breaking the bubble. Good luck to you.
"Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
It seems to me that some important person in the news was advocating for exactly what you are talking about. Hmmmm, what was that guys name again? Seems to me that guy may not be as much of a moron as the forums seem to claim...
"Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
Iraq: They set us up the bomb.
2001, anthrax
Made in Ft. Detrick, Md.
So much for "no developed country" has them
In a lab.
Not in a war head or bomb.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Right, and Israel doesn't have nukes...
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
In the mail, as a warhead.
Three times.
And somehow, the White House was on mandatory Cipro from 1 may, 2001 through 3 June 2003. Hmm. Wonder what THEY knew.
A paper envelope is not a warhead.
It is a paper envelope.
And that anthrax was nor "manufactured" but stolen.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
A paper envelope full of Torpex is a warhead when delivered to an intended victim with a detonating device.
A warhead is a thing with an explosive device inside, distributing its payload over a huge area.
A paper envelope, even with an explosive inside, is not a war head.
Thanks for nitpicking, idiot.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.