If west europe it was like -30C and colder, so it does not really sound plausible that central north america had + degrees. On the other hand a year or two ago, the great lakes had -20C and less temperature while west europe, including scandinavia, had +10C - +20C.
In europe we always had either 3 dishes, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and/or a 4th additional dish 'fake and tea', usually only served on weekends. Some countries like Spain and Italy or Greece skip breakfast or have only a rudimentary breakfast.
6-11 servings is the problem, not the thing you actually eat.
An american friend told me about the 'snack culture' that the americans established, sorry: that is the problem.
Replaccing fat with sugar, is stupid of course.
But what I gather from/. you are just moving into the opposite false direction now in america regarding nutrition instead of simply readi about it how the body works.
Can't be so hard to get scientific hard literature about nutrition.
Using them as an example of anything in terms of social policies is hardly exportable to most other country's circumstances. Of course it is! The other countries would be exactly the same as Norway if they had done the same politics Norway did after WWII. But alas... the bad evil communists...
I warn about that one. It asks for privileges to install (Mac OS X Applications usually don't need privileges, you just copy them with drag and drop into the Applications folder), then tries to install (with a warning) a "Yahoo Toolbar" and silently installs "Mac Keeper" a mal ware. But it is easy to remove with sudo "rm..."... but I think I used an chmod or chown before that... don't remember what I actually needed to do to remove it. There was a background process running, watching the killing of the Mac Keeper process, so you needed to kill that first, remove the exe of that process and then kill Mac Keeper and remove the "Andy" programm.
If only scientists and supporting institutions had done a better job to just stay in their own lane... simply boringly run models and offer informed predictions rather than inject activism there would be less propensity for confusion between roles of science and politics. Then everything that happened the recent 30 years to work against climate change, would not even happen 30 years in the future. If you have a smoking friend and you are a medical you are not allowed to point out to him that smoking is dangerous?
the 1940's and 1950's still hold the king for being the warmest winters ever. That is extremely unlikely. I guess you are mixing something up. Those years where amoung the coldest on record in the northern hemisphere. In Europe the coldest ever. Just barely reached around 1975 again.
I guess one part of the problem is that americans usually completely ignore science from other parts of the world. "Eat more carbs", sorry never heard about that advice. And I'm not aware of publications with that message in Europe, nor did I get taught that in school. Bottom line people should have some common sense. Carbs can be converted into fat. Eat to much, you become fat. It is as simple as that. Eat it in bad combinations with fat, you even get fatter. There actually never was a big dispute about how nutrition works during the last 50 years. It seems always only to be "misinformation" and "en vogue" diet hints in magazins. Can't be so hard to read a book about it and figure what kind of diet suits yourself instead of jumping from one nonsense diet to the next one.
Appealing to authority is a logical fallacy. Asking an expert about a certain thing, he is an expert about, is not "appealing to authority". Appealing to authority means: the pope knows much about god (he is an authority about god), so he must know if my car is really broken or if the mechanic tries to rip me of (appealing to an authority that has no clue about cars and the work of an mechanics).
If your hypothesis is not falsifiable, it's not science. Actually it is. "Falsifiable" is a term invented by an american scientist, and it basically means proof. In other words, it is used in "reverse meaning" in argumentations.
Every scientific experiment is aimed to _proof_ or at least support a hypothesis, not to disproof it. It is extremely difficult to set up a hypothesis and find counter experiments at the same time. And running billions of counter experiments that all fail to succeed would not disproof (falsify in the literal meaning of the word) anything.
Keeping looking for reasons your hypothesis being true is not science either
That is nonsense. If that was the case we had no gravity wave detectors in space nor particle accelerators on earth.
Well, if you like to buy a $5 battery and spend an hour fiddeling with opening your old iPhone, getting the battery out, put the new in and closing it again, and even have fun with it... THEN: you should simply buy such a battery on eBay or Amazon, can't be so hard.
I for my part rather drop it at an Apple store and go into the cinema while they fix it, or sit in the sun with a beer and take a nice meal.
I have an old iPhone 4S and a friend of mine just bought 6month ago an iPhone 4Sx (don't know the x... a brand new iPhone 4). Actually from the form factor they are my favourites.
I think it depends also a lot on the hormones. So with enough artificial testosterone even a XX whole "female" embryo should develop to a male. Not 100% sure. Definitely a "male" XY embryo will develop to a most of the time fertile woman.
Who cares about the number of people on the planet? Get rid of CO2 pollution and we have no problem.
I'm tired about idiots throwing the "over population mantra" who live in countries that clearly has no overpopulation.
Hint: most first nations have problems with sustaining their population size, birth rates far below 2.0 kids per couple, or woman. And for some strange reason (actually not so strange if you dig into it) they have the highest rates of infertile men, too.
Why do you want to punish an Japanese or German man for overpopulation in Bangladesh?
I once watched a documentation about the education of marine fighter pilots. One of the 'tests' was (after month of preparation) to drop them from a ship into the northern sea. In flight clothing, inflatable rescue boat (same as in the plane) floating besides them. And the instructors, with a megaphone yelling at them to crawl out of the water into the boat. A huge percentage did not manage that, and were removed from the marine fighters education course and remained air force pilots.
Functional programming is not more complicated then other imperative programming styles. But unfortunately functional languages like Haskell often have a strange syntax, that is all.
Of course some cities in Russia are founded by Vikings... that does not change the fact that Vikings/Germans and Russians/Slavic People are two different ethnic groups.
Cologne was found by Romans, but there mainly always only lived Germans/Teutons.
German is the correct name (but the english don't use it) for the group of teutonic tribes living in Germania (hence the name) ans Skandinavia.
The Teutons are just a single tribe, getting famous for attacking Rome. For some reason the english speaking historians picked that tribes name to classify all teutonic tribes.
It is like calling all red wines Chianti or all black tees Darjeeling.
No, but I have common sense. The plants itself don't produce CO2. The production of the plants won't produce CO2 in future when they are build with non CO2 producing electricity. So the remaining thing, which might take longer to get rid off, is transportation to the building site and building the plant up.
In the end basically none of the thee technologoies will produce any CO2. So it is pretty idiotic to make CO2 comparision graphs about technologies that don't produce CO2 in the forst place.
Why solar energy should procude 4 times as much as wind/nuclear is beyond me... it makes no sense at all.
Why are you since years repeating the lie that nuclear power produces less CO2 than wind and solar? Then later can basically installed with zero CO2 emissions, the first likely never will have zero (transportatin, mining etc.)
Slashdot Mirror
If west europe it was like -30C and colder, so it does not really sound plausible that central north america had + degrees.
On the other hand a year or two ago, the great lakes had -20C and less temperature while west europe, including scandinavia, had +10C - +20C.
Seems 'the arctic vortex' is a bitcchy bitch.
In europe we always had either 3 dishes, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and/or a 4th additional dish 'fake and tea', usually only served on weekends. Some countries like Spain and Italy or Greece skip breakfast or have only a rudimentary breakfast.
6-11 servings is the problem, not the thing you actually eat.
An american friend told me about the 'snack culture' that the americans established, sorry: that is the problem.
Replaccing fat with sugar, is stupid of course.
But what I gather from /. you are just moving into the opposite false direction now in america regarding nutrition instead of simply readi about it how the body works.
Can't be so hard to get scientific hard literature about nutrition.
More like 30,000 tons or 30 million tons. ;D
Or are you thinking about the amount you could mine, then you might be right
Norway does not need a proper defense against, lets say the Russians.
1)
There is Sweden and Finland between Norway and Russia.
2)
If the US had not made "communism" and "Russia" the number one bad guy on the planet, why would need anyone a defense against them?
Using them as an example of anything in terms of social policies is hardly exportable to most other country's circumstances. ... the bad evil communists ...
Of course it is!
The other countries would be exactly the same as Norway if they had done the same politics Norway did after WWII.
But alas
I warn about that one. ..." ... but I think I used an chmod or chown before that ... don't remember what I actually needed to do to remove it.
It asks for privileges to install (Mac OS X Applications usually don't need privileges, you just copy them with drag and drop into the Applications folder), then tries to install (with a warning) a "Yahoo Toolbar" and silently installs "Mac Keeper" a mal ware.
But it is easy to remove with sudo "rm
There was a background process running, watching the killing of the Mac Keeper process, so you needed to kill that first, remove the exe of that process and then kill Mac Keeper and remove the "Andy" programm.
If only scientists and supporting institutions had done a better job to just stay in their own lane... simply boringly run models and offer informed predictions rather than inject activism there would be less propensity for confusion between roles of science and politics.
Then everything that happened the recent 30 years to work against climate change, would not even happen 30 years in the future.
If you have a smoking friend and you are a medical you are not allowed to point out to him that smoking is dangerous?
the 1940's and 1950's still hold the king for being the warmest winters ever.
That is extremely unlikely. I guess you are mixing something up. Those years where amoung the coldest on record in the northern hemisphere. In Europe the coldest ever. Just barely reached around 1975 again.
I guess one part of the problem is that americans usually completely ignore science from other parts of the world.
"Eat more carbs", sorry never heard about that advice. And I'm not aware of publications with that message in Europe, nor did I get taught that in school.
Bottom line people should have some common sense. Carbs can be converted into fat. Eat to much, you become fat. It is as simple as that. Eat it in bad combinations with fat, you even get fatter.
There actually never was a big dispute about how nutrition works during the last 50 years.
It seems always only to be "misinformation" and "en vogue" diet hints in magazins.
Can't be so hard to read a book about it and figure what kind of diet suits yourself instead of jumping from one nonsense diet to the next one.
The hurricanes moved north without hitting the US.
So what is your problem with that?
You should be happy instead of playing the idiot.
Appealing to authority is a logical fallacy.
Asking an expert about a certain thing, he is an expert about, is not "appealing to authority".
Appealing to authority means: the pope knows much about god (he is an authority about god), so he must know if my car is really broken or if the mechanic tries to rip me of (appealing to an authority that has no clue about cars and the work of an mechanics).
There are no server cold temperatures.
There are only a few times at a few spots temperatures that where ver common 10, 50 or 100 or more years ago.
The cold wave in east USA now and 2 or 3 years ago around the great lakes: that was the norm until shortly after WWII ended.
If your hypothesis is not falsifiable, it's not science.
Actually it is. "Falsifiable" is a term invented by an american scientist, and it basically means proof. In other words, it is used in "reverse meaning" in argumentations.
Every scientific experiment is aimed to _proof_ or at least support a hypothesis, not to disproof it. It is extremely difficult to set up a hypothesis and find counter experiments at the same time. And running billions of counter experiments that all fail to succeed would not disproof (falsify in the literal meaning of the word) anything.
Keeping looking for reasons your hypothesis being true is not science either
That is nonsense. If that was the case we had no gravity wave detectors in space nor particle accelerators on earth.
Well, ...
if you like to buy a $5 battery and spend an hour fiddeling with opening your old iPhone, getting the battery out, put the new in and closing it again, and even have fun with it
THEN: you should simply buy such a battery on eBay or Amazon, can't be so hard.
I for my part rather drop it at an Apple store and go into the cinema while they fix it, or sit in the sun with a beer and take a nice meal.
I have an old iPhone 4S and a friend of mine just bought 6month ago an iPhone 4Sx (don't know the x ... a brand new iPhone 4).
Actually from the form factor they are my favourites.
I think it depends also a lot on the hormones.
So with enough artificial testosterone even a XX whole "female" embryo should develop to a male. Not 100% sure. Definitely a "male" XY embryo will develop to a most of the time fertile woman.
Who cares about the number of people on the planet?
Get rid of CO2 pollution and we have no problem.
I'm tired about idiots throwing the "over population mantra" who live in countries that clearly has no overpopulation.
Hint: most first nations have problems with sustaining their population size, birth rates far below 2.0 kids per couple, or woman. And for some strange reason (actually not so strange if you dig into it) they have the highest rates of infertile men, too.
Why do you want to punish an Japanese or German man for overpopulation in Bangladesh?
In vitro yes.
Via intercourse not so much.
Fertilization is (un?)fortunately not as easy as sperm meets egg.
I once watched a documentation about the education of marine fighter pilots.
One of the 'tests' was (after month of preparation) to drop them from a ship into the northern sea. In flight clothing, inflatable rescue boat (same as in the plane) floating besides them. And the instructors, with a megaphone yelling at them to crawl out of the water into the boat.
A huge percentage did not manage that, and were removed from the marine fighters education course and remained air force pilots.
Big sharks are actually warm blooded (Great white, Tiger sharks and Mongo etc.)
Functional programming is not more complicated then other imperative programming styles.
But unfortunately functional languages like Haskell often have a strange syntax, that is all.
Of course some cities in Russia are founded by Vikings ... that does not change the fact that Vikings/Germans and Russians/Slavic People are two different ethnic groups.
Cologne was found by Romans, but there mainly always only lived Germans/Teutons.
German is the correct name (but the english don't use it) for the group of teutonic tribes living in Germania (hence the name) ans Skandinavia.
The Teutons are just a single tribe, getting famous for attacking Rome. For some reason the english speaking historians picked that tribes name to classify all teutonic tribes.
It is like calling all red wines Chianti or all black tees Darjeeling.
No, but I have common sense.
The plants itself don't produce CO2.
The production of the plants won't produce CO2 in future when they are build with non CO2 producing electricity.
So the remaining thing, which might take longer to get rid off, is transportation to the building site and building the plant up.
In the end basically none of the thee technologoies will produce any CO2. So it is pretty idiotic to make CO2 comparision graphs about technologies that don't produce CO2 in the forst place.
Why solar energy should procude 4 times as much as wind/nuclear is beyond me ... it makes no sense at all.
Why are you since years repeating the lie that nuclear power produces less CO2 than wind and solar?
Then later can basically installed with zero CO2 emissions, the first likely never will have zero (transportatin, mining etc.)
Depending on the price tag, I would buy one or two.
Or take them as gifts!
I like fireworks!