and thus it would be very inconvenient to really run trains with just wind-generated electricity. Obviouslly, the railways use a grid. So obviously they know how much wind power they feed into the grid.
2. Wind is a rather unreliable source of power - it may happen that the actual power usage of the trains exceed the actual power output of all the contracted wind farms (as the latter number may very well drop down to practically zero)... You are so smart and nevertheless so dumb. Ever looked on a map? I suggest to look up where Netherlands are... and then find a plausible reason why they should have zero wind. Hu?
PV has more than triple the carbon footprint That e.g. is a lie. From your previous post, where drinkypoo replied to. To lazy to point out more lies...
The moron is you. The story is about FRANCE. A country in Europe. Not about *deforestation*. We "farm" trees since centuries. There is no *deforestation* in Europe, stupid idiot.
Yet, you claimed with utter certainty that getting rid of coal would "save billions, probably trillions". A guy who dies with 20, could have worked 40 - 45 more years. If he pays 10k in taxes each year that is 450.000 in taxes, lost.
Well, the "don't consume, don't spend their money on vacations" is a good part. I would say the people living from providing vacation spots beg to differ.
Lung cancer is quick and deadly. Strange... in my country it is treated. Some even get transplants.
I call you an idiot because you are an idiot. Again: which laws of physics or laws of chemistry force me to produce solar cells, batteries, transport them, interconnect them, with a CO2 producing energy source?
Wood is a really scarce resource. In France? Or the rest of north Europe for that matter? Ever checked google earth? The rest of your comment is rather stupid, as growing wood and dying wood and rotting wood is a zero sum game. It does not affect the CO2 level at all.
First of all: this year and probably next year is a "normal year". Neither El Nino, nor La Nina. Secondly: all three phases, La Nina, "inbetween" and El Nino last several years. Not a single year. Thirdly: after an "inbetween" Phase it is completely open if the next phase is an El Nino or an La Nina... they are not really alternating.
No, there is right now no La Nina, we are still in the ending of the El Nino. The next phase will be a "normal phase" and if we get afterwards a La Nina, or another El Nino... we can not predict:D
"well we're here, we MUST have done it"? That flies directly in the fact of non-disputed evidence. So which evidence are you talking about?
You have evidence that all human produced CO2 somehow disappeared? But: some unknown source of CO2 put more or less the same amount like he disappeared human production into the atmosphere?
That sounds interesting... so any hints for us, how the human made CO2 disappeared and where the replacement came from?
If the store keeper is a muslim, they migt have a legit point. On the other hand they likely get complimented out, regardless what origin the store keeper has.
Hiw many kilograms of platinum are in suhc a car, and how much is that in dollars? Are you sure it is more than in your combustion engines exhaust scrubber?
Lacking nuclear power we see that battery electric vehicles are not any more "green" than using fossil fuels. Why are you writing nonsense like this?
the carbon footprint those batteries have is not added in. Battery backed solar has a carbon footprint no better than natural gas. Care to explain which law of ohysics or chemistry causes that?
I have to believe that the energy consumption involved in collection, separation and refining of recycled materials into something usable is more than making virgin materials and has a lot to do with why recycling winds up being economically non-viable. And why do you believe nonsense like that instead of googleing for facts? How should smelting 1 ton ready steal from a recycled car be more costly in any terms than refining it with coal (koks) from a few dozen tons of ore? Why is everyone in the developed world recycling? You obviously not...
Slashdot Mirror
and thus it would be very inconvenient to really run trains with just wind-generated electricity.
Obviouslly, the railways use a grid. So obviously they know how much wind power they feed into the grid.
2. Wind is a rather unreliable source of power - it may happen that the actual power usage of the trains exceed the actual power output of all the contracted wind farms (as the latter number may very well drop down to practically zero) ... ... and then find a plausible reason why they should have zero wind. Hu?
You are so smart and nevertheless so dumb.
Ever looked on a map? I suggest to look up where Netherlands are
No, we are in an interglacial.
Blame the stupid scientists who misnamed ice ages and glacial periods to confuse the general public.
The people there are all ready for Caliphats or whatever.
After all Sadam also only was a kind of Caliph.
A foreign country invading, and then saying: and now lets just be a democracy, does not work.
I doubt the climate change there has any big influence in ISIS itself, it only makes the areas they conquer, more easy to conquer.
PV has more than triple the carbon footprint ...
That e.g. is a lie. From your previous post, where drinkypoo replied to.
To lazy to point out more lies
ISIS is mainly a result of the Iraq war desaster.
The moron is you.
The story is about FRANCE.
A country in Europe. Not about *deforestation*.
We "farm" trees since centuries. There is no *deforestation* in Europe, stupid idiot.
Yet, you claimed with utter certainty that getting rid of coal would "save billions, probably trillions".
A guy who dies with 20, could have worked 40 - 45 more years.
If he pays 10k in taxes each year that is 450.000 in taxes, lost.
Well, the "don't consume, don't spend their money on vacations" is a good part.
I would say the people living from providing vacation spots beg to differ.
Lung cancer is quick and deadly. ... in my country it is treated. Some even get transplants.
Strange
If you think so ...
I suggest to study your enemy ... instead of having wild ideas. That might help if you actually have/want to fight him.
Answer to the wrong person? :)
You should have answered that to some of our parents
Recycling is cheaper for basically everything, especially paper and glass.
And I'm rather called a cunt than being an idiot like you.
I call you an idiot because you are an idiot.
Again: which laws of physics or laws of chemistry force me to produce solar cells, batteries, transport them, interconnect them, with a CO2 producing energy source?
Wood is a really scarce resource.
In France? Or the rest of north Europe for that matter? Ever checked google earth?
The rest of your comment is rather stupid, as growing wood and dying wood and rotting wood is a zero sum game. It does not affect the CO2 level at all.
Of course not. ... facepalm.
That is why one of the most advanced nation on the planet is building them.
It is a hoax, obviously
The walls only very rarely concrete. ...
In USA
In Europe they are.
First of all: this year and probably next year is a "normal year". Neither El Nino, nor La Nina. ... they are not really alternating.
Secondly: all three phases, La Nina, "inbetween" and El Nino last several years. Not a single year.
Thirdly: after an "inbetween" Phase it is completely open if the next phase is an El Nino or an La Nina
Milankovitch cycles have nothing to do with CO2 ... so what is your point?
No, there is right now no La Nina, we are still in the ending of the El Nino. ... we can not predict :D
The next phase will be a "normal phase" and if we get afterwards a La Nina, or another El Nino
So you want to say, 10, 50, 100 years ago, we had the same "random" peak temperatures during summer, with the same highs and the same occurrence?
The current climate models are all on wikipedia ... you simply would find them with google.
"well we're here, we MUST have done it"? That flies directly in the fact of non-disputed evidence.
So which evidence are you talking about?
You have evidence that all human produced CO2 somehow disappeared? But: some unknown source of CO2 put more or less the same amount like he disappeared human production into the atmosphere?
That sounds interesting ... so any hints for us, how the human made CO2 disappeared and where the replacement came from?
If the store keeper is a muslim, they migt have a legit point.
On the other hand they likely get complimented out, regardless what origin the store keeper has.
Hiw many kilograms of platinum are in suhc a car, and how much is that in dollars?
Are you sure it is more than in your combustion engines exhaust scrubber?
Lacking nuclear power we see that battery electric vehicles are not any more "green" than using fossil fuels.
Why are you writing nonsense like this?
the carbon footprint those batteries have is not added in. Battery backed solar has a carbon footprint no better than natural gas.
Care to explain which law of ohysics or chemistry causes that?
How can you be such an idiot? It is beyon me!
I have to believe that the energy consumption involved in collection, separation and refining of recycled materials into something usable is more than making virgin materials and has a lot to do with why recycling winds up being economically non-viable. ...
And why do you believe nonsense like that instead of googleing for facts?
How should smelting 1 ton ready steal from a recycled car be more costly in any terms than refining it with coal (koks) from a few dozen tons of ore?
Why is everyone in the developed world recycling? You obviously not
But people want to use the stargate!
To get to the stargate from the surrounding cities, you need a hyperloop!