Ad hominem: you served jail time for "insert your crime", hence your argument must be wrong. Appeal to Authority: he is a professor (about greek history) and you are mechanics, so his few about climate change must be right, and you are wrong.
That is not really true. If warming can be limited to about 2C or 3C even, there won't be much sea level rise.
Sea level rise is a danger if we fail to limit AGW... because then Greenland or Antarctica might contribute several meters to sea level rises, depending on how warm it gets and how long the warms lasts.
He is just an idiot like that guy I had a conversation with lately. I mentioned I live in Isan (Thailand) and that it had only about 3 - 4 days of rain during the last 5 month.
He did not believe it and posted a link as answer. "To correct me". The link with average rain in "Thailand"... well, Bangkok.
In the further conversation he simply did not grasp that BKK is more than 1000km away, that Isan is a high plateau surrounded by mountains and BKK is at the coast... what an idiot.
ENSO has no effect in global warming. Neither El Nino nor La Nina are warming or cooling phenonema. Both effects only shift the areas where it is particular warm and areas where it is particular cold around. That is all.
The warming trend in that era was likely caused by variations in solar radiation, Unlikely. Solar activity does not vary enough to have any significant effect on earth.
They run on near weapons grade fuel. Erm... this is the case why they can not scale... there is not much fuel like this. Weapon grade means it is highly enriched... probably up to 99%.
1. Free movement rules. Nations have no say in who can cross their borders...migrants or workers. Enough people in UK don't like this but clearly you think they're not sane. From other EU countries, moron.
2. EU requires a 15% VAT on everything from tampons to electric bills...not very progressive of them. Wrong. Idiot. In Germany VAT is 19% in others it is 20%... oh, and on food it is 7% and on forrest products 1%... fucking moron. There is no EU law demanding 15% VAT, why would there? What benefit would the EU have? Your VAT goes to your country, fucking idiot.
3. EU has strict banking regulations, pushed mostly by the Germans...British argued for more relaxed rules. There is no "completely independent" here. Only to prevent secret banking and money laundering and tax evasion. But you still have the City of London and all the other tax havens like in the careebean etc. So why do you complain?
Again: you can do what you want unless you want to contradict an EU law. And as your elected representatives in the EU can influence laws... what is your stupid problem???
As soon as a wind plant is build or a solar plant, it produces no CO2 anymore.
Every plant using fuel still does... for fuel mining and transportation.
Fusion will replace fission sooner or later. Extremely unlikely.
might end up with anitmatter reactors or something even more exotic. Impossible. Antimatter needs to be created first... which would cost absurd amounts of energy.
I have NEVER come across anyone in any of these 'discussions' that even really tries to look at the total picture or the long term or even the medium term, you all look at the short term and a microcosm instead. Because it is a discussion. And not a 300 pages book about the topic. Why don't you read some?
Slashdot Mirror
No, it is floods.
From a drought you can "run away", from a flood not so much.
Ad hominem: you served jail time for "insert your crime", hence your argument must be wrong.
Appeal to Authority: he is a professor (about greek history) and you are mechanics, so his few about climate change must be right, and you are wrong.
He talks about a "hots summer" that melts perma frost in siberia in a 10km or 100km wide stripe.
And yes, that could have a catastrophic effect.
That is not really true.
If warming can be limited to about 2C or 3C even, there won't be much sea level rise.
Sea level rise is a danger if we fail to limit AGW ... because then Greenland or Antarctica might contribute several meters to sea level rises, depending on how warm it gets and how long the warms lasts.
Obviously.
Their natural summer habitate does not exist anymore, so they migrate.
So ... great ... for the environment.
So you don't dispose your light bulbs properly but blame the material for environmental hazards?
Yes, it is not science.
Because it is only a single prediction.
Perhaps if you had read the linked article, you had realized: it is news!
What is wrong with posting news based on scientific predictions?
But you knew that.
I don't think he knew that.
He is just an idiot like that guy I had a conversation with lately. I mentioned I live in Isan (Thailand) and that it had only about 3 - 4 days of rain during the last 5 month.
He did not believe it and posted a link as answer. "To correct me". ... well, Bangkok.
The link with average rain in "Thailand"
In the further conversation he simply did not grasp that BKK is more than 1000km away, that Isan is a high plateau surrounded by mountains and BKK is at the coast ... what an idiot.
ENSO has no effect in global warming.
Neither El Nino nor La Nina are warming or cooling phenonema.
Both effects only shift the areas where it is particular warm and areas where it is particular cold around. That is all.
The warming trend in that era was likely caused by variations in solar radiation,
Unlikely.
Solar activity does not vary enough to have any significant effect on earth.
They run on near weapons grade fuel. ... this is the case why they can not scale ... there is not much fuel like this. ... probably up to 99%.
Erm
Weapon grade means it is highly enriched
Thanks, that is interesting.
Strangely I learned in my last job it would be true north and not magnetic north. Perhaps I learned it wrong or forgot it already :D
I'm not even 12 personalities in one person.
Are you certain? I mean, is anyone of your "yous" certain?
Actually none of them. Runways are labeled by true north, not by magnetic north.
Hey man! You have a problem with counting!!
Or a problem where north is!!
But you are funny, was about to write something similar.
But hint: Greenland belongs to Denmark. (Not hint for you but the other readers)
1. Free movement rules. Nations have no say in who can cross their borders...migrants or workers. Enough people in UK don't like this but clearly you think they're not sane.
From other EU countries, moron.
2. EU requires a 15% VAT on everything from tampons to electric bills...not very progressive of them. ... oh, and on food it is 7% and on forrest products 1% ... fucking moron. There is no EU law demanding 15% VAT, why would there? What benefit would the EU have? Your VAT goes to your country, fucking idiot.
Wrong. Idiot. In Germany VAT is 19% in others it is 20%
3. EU has strict banking regulations, pushed mostly by the Germans...British argued for more relaxed rules. There is no "completely independent" here.
Only to prevent secret banking and money laundering and tax evasion. But you still have the City of London and all the other tax havens like in the careebean etc. So why do you complain?
Again: you can do what you want unless you want to contradict an EU law. And as your elected representatives in the EU can influence laws ... what is your stupid problem???
He got murdered, so what?
The idea that you randomly died between 30 and 100 because you lived in prehistoric times is idiotic.
You only died to accidents or sickness, just the same as in our days.
Science is the same for everything ...
That is why we have formulars in physics.
There is no high safety record.
And small plants like those in subs don't scale for commercial sizes. Or why exactly do you think we have none of that type?
No, I don't. The parent is. I just picked a prominent example.
No they did not.
For what fucked upped reason would they?
Ramses was 99 or something ...
It does not matter if opinions are "right" or "left".
It only matters if they are stupid or not. Or scientific wrong.
No, I don't need to visit a mountain ... again.
I know the difference between snow and a glacier, you seem not to know it ...
go into the rockies in the summer, any time, you will see snow on the high peaks.
Obviously. Same in Alps, same in the Himalaya.
And what exactly has that to do with glaciers?
and reduced-g offers longer life spans. ...
No it does not, why would it? All we know it most likely reduces it
I'm only 50, so I have 30 - 50 years to go.
As I have no heirs, I would go in an instant to either of them or both, if I had the money.
As soon as a wind plant is build or a solar plant, it produces no CO2 anymore.
Every plant using fuel still does ... for fuel mining and transportation.
Fusion will replace fission sooner or later.
Extremely unlikely.
might end up with anitmatter reactors or something even more exotic. ... which would cost absurd amounts of energy.
Impossible. Antimatter needs to be created first
I have NEVER come across anyone in any of these 'discussions' that even really tries to look at the total picture or the long term or even the medium term, you all look at the short term and a microcosm instead.
Because it is a discussion. And not a 300 pages book about the topic. Why don't you read some?