As far as all electrical or even hybrid vehicles all my experiences with them tell me a few things, they don't have the same sort of get up and go power to them that a regular vehicle has in most cases and they are terribly expensive to repair.
As for repairs, all indications are battery electric vehicles will be much cheaper to maintain and repair, due to the much simpler design of an electric motor vs a ICE. Time will tell on that one. But with no oil to change, no air filters, no timing belts, PCV valves or catalytic converters, and only one moving part in an electric motor -- it seems a good bet.
Sun placed NFS as well as the underlying XDR and RPC source code in the public domain over 15 years ago. There is no need for a license.
The protocol itself is described in RFC-1094, RFC-1813 (NFS v2 and v3), RFC-1057 (RPC) and RFC-1014 (XDR).
While on the one hand it is nice to see this pressure to get rid of DRM for "purchased" tracks, it is pretty disappointing to see that the move will also come with an increase in price.
If they remove just the DRM yet keep the existing encoding in place, then it would become easy to break the decryption scheme on all the existing DRM'd tracks. One would have both the "cipher" and "plain text" for a song, and so the encryption scheme would be weakened.
Thus they need to change the encoding, and so they made it higher quality. In addition, Apple is offering to upgrade all existing purchases to the higher quality format for only the difference in price. If they didn't switch to higher quality encoding, there would be no ability to charge for "removing" the DRM--something many of us feel THEY should pay for.
So by using a higher quality encoding, Apple creates both perceived difference in value, as well as protects their existing cyphers
I use USB 2.0 connected external IDE drives for ZFS. USB is fast enough for me (my Solaris box serves as a NFS server for MythTV just fine) and lets me move them easily to another machine when needed. Solaris treats USB as SCSI, so it gets around those IDE woes, yet I can still use old IDE drives in the array.
--Woof!
Whether those estimates were justified or not is to be debated.
I must disagree. Google doesn't provide estimates of their own, so the silly analysts make something up to justify their existence. When the real numbers come in, somehow Google stock gets punished, not the analysts who made the error in the first place!
So what exactly was "missed"? Some overpaid suit's guess at how Google's business is run. In a non-cyber business, an analyst MAY add some value by independently checking on supply chain, inventory positions, raw material prices, customer visits, etc. to determine a model of the business. But none of this can be done in Google's case, which is why the estimates from the various analysts themselves ranged all over the map, from $1.51 to $1.98 per share. The actual number reported by GOOG was $1.54, below the average guess but above lowest guess. So, if guesses are really important, one could say that GOOG reported $0.03 BETTER than estimates!
Don't blame the company for an outsider's inability to "guess". If you cannot verify the business from sources outside the company, you have no right to "guess" in the first place.
Slashdot Mirror
As far as all electrical or even hybrid vehicles all my experiences with them tell me a few things, they don't have the same sort of get up and go power to them that a regular vehicle has in most cases and they are terribly expensive to repair.
Hmm, your Tundra can do 0-60 in under 4 seconds, and a quarter mile in under 13? A stock Tesla roadster can http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/video/3068-tesla-roadster-sport-nedra-record-12-643-1-4-mile.html
And a 1972 Datsun converted to pure electric is even faster. 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, quarter mile in 11.5 seconds. http://www.plasmaboyracing.com/whitezombie.php
That's an awful lot of get up and go power.
As for repairs, all indications are battery electric vehicles will be much cheaper to maintain and repair, due to the much simpler design of an electric motor vs a ICE. Time will tell on that one. But with no oil to change, no air filters, no timing belts, PCV valves or catalytic converters, and only one moving part in an electric motor -- it seems a good bet.
--Woof!
Life imitates art. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hole_Man. --Woof!
Sun placed NFS as well as the underlying XDR and RPC source code in the public domain over 15 years ago. There is no need for a license.
The protocol itself is described in RFC-1094, RFC-1813 (NFS v2 and v3), RFC-1057 (RPC) and RFC-1014 (XDR).
--Woof!
Myth can record HD using firewire from Digital Cable boxes.
In many areas, Comcast has removed the 5C encryption from all but the pay channels, so it is actually useful.
--Woof!
Pretty Picture here http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/when_not_where
--Woof!
If they remove just the DRM yet keep the existing encoding in place, then it would become easy to break the decryption scheme on all the existing DRM'd tracks. One would have both the "cipher" and "plain text" for a song, and so the encryption scheme would be weakened.
Thus they need to change the encoding, and so they made it higher quality. In addition, Apple is offering to upgrade all existing purchases to the higher quality format for only the difference in price. If they didn't switch to higher quality encoding, there would be no ability to charge for "removing" the DRM--something many of us feel THEY should pay for.
So by using a higher quality encoding, Apple creates both perceived difference in value, as well as protects their existing cyphers
--Woof!
I use USB 2.0 connected external IDE drives for ZFS. USB is fast enough for me (my Solaris box serves as a NFS server for MythTV just fine) and lets me move them easily to another machine when needed. Solaris treats USB as SCSI, so it gets around those IDE woes, yet I can still use old IDE drives in the array. --Woof!
Whether those estimates were justified or not is to be debated.
I must disagree. Google doesn't provide estimates of their own, so the silly analysts make something up to justify their existence. When the real numbers come in, somehow Google stock gets punished, not the analysts who made the error in the first place!
So what exactly was "missed"? Some overpaid suit's guess at how Google's business is run. In a non-cyber business, an analyst MAY add some value by independently checking on supply chain, inventory positions, raw material prices, customer visits, etc. to determine a model of the business. But none of this can be done in Google's case, which is why the estimates from the various analysts themselves ranged all over the map, from $1.51 to $1.98 per share. The actual number reported by GOOG was $1.54, below the average guess but above lowest guess. So, if guesses are really important, one could say that GOOG reported $0.03 BETTER than estimates!
Don't blame the company for an outsider's inability to "guess". If you cannot verify the business from sources outside the company, you have no right to "guess" in the first place.
This should work:
RFC 2549 - IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service
--Woof!