Um, no. Completely excise defense spending, but leave the taxes from it in, and we are still running a deficit, especially with all the new spending instituted by Obama.
It violates the flag code to make clothing out of a flag, NOT to display a PICTURE or other representation of the flag on a piece of clothing. Do try to get it right if you're going to be anal about the flag code. It makes life so much less vexing.
Horseshit, that's humanity for you. Most humans would like most decisions made for them, preferably while they are unaware that it's happening. Blaming that particular trait on an economic system is fucking stupid.
Exactly, the man's an idiot, especially this gem "The United States' high-technology, high-price, and high-maintenance weaponry is of relatively little value in such conflicts." What he fails to understand is that it is our high tech overwhelming advantage that forces them to use methods such as IEDs, since we ream their asses in any conventional confrontation.
Of course, there's the fact that the meat portion of the diet has jack all to do with the obesity condition of the population, but lets not let facts get in the way of a good rant.
That's because you didn't use the car analogy. Namely, IE is the car, their internal to the computer directories are the driveway and their postal box, their internal to the network directories are the closest town and stores along normal roads, and anything with www uses the highway to get where it needs to. A vast simplification which can be wrong if you use an internal DNS, but otherwise quite correct.
This is a really really stupid decision when you consider that the number of american households reporting gun ownership rose from 41-47% from last year to this year.
Only a redneck would strap a JATO to a car. Hell, Oak Lawn is nothing but rednecks and nuclear physics. Rednecks are perfectly innovative. "Hey Guys, Watch This!" is practically religious scripture among them.
Sorry, but even if true that doesn't cut the mustard. These are not souped up muscle cars with bog-standard braking systems, and even if true that the accelerator stuck the brakes would have been more than able to have slowed and stopped the car. All of the "malfunctions" reported continuous hard acceleration.
*blinks* You're not well versed in the effect of turbulence on localized airspeed or altitude are you? The sensors will report airspeeds that are only possible in a dive, combined with the loss of altitude even though the angle of attack is level or steady could easily cause software to attempt to pull out of the "dive". That assumes that the plane is allowed to override human input, which is a seriously fucking asinine design if true.
Even if you do each part in order it's not exactly difficult. 100*75 is 7500. Half of that is 3750. 3750-225(which is 75*3) is 3525. 25 goes into 100 4 times, so multiply 35 times 4 plus 1 to get your final answer. More roundabout, but even people who don't deconstruct the problem entirely should have little problem doing it.
Because Fox News is really going to do a hit piece on Issa. You'd be much more correct naming the Grey Bitch, aka the NY Times because lo and behold, they DID publish a hit piece on Issa
Slashdot Mirror
Being that it's impossible to prove a negative, no.
Um, no. Completely excise defense spending, but leave the taxes from it in, and we are still running a deficit, especially with all the new spending instituted by Obama.
It violates the flag code to make clothing out of a flag, NOT to display a PICTURE or other representation of the flag on a piece of clothing. Do try to get it right if you're going to be anal about the flag code. It makes life so much less vexing.
Horseshit, that's humanity for you. Most humans would like most decisions made for them, preferably while they are unaware that it's happening. Blaming that particular trait on an economic system is fucking stupid.
Because it's in swedish and makes me think of dead moose. Seriously though, that set of movies is completely different after playing Magicka.
Exactly, the man's an idiot, especially this gem "The United States' high-technology, high-price, and high-maintenance weaponry is of relatively little value in such conflicts." What he fails to understand is that it is our high tech overwhelming advantage that forces them to use methods such as IEDs, since we ream their asses in any conventional confrontation.
But, But, the corporations.
Sure, but we'll have to kill off the majority of the populations of China, India, and Africa.
Of course, there's the fact that the meat portion of the diet has jack all to do with the obesity condition of the population, but lets not let facts get in the way of a good rant.
Also, the phrase "corporate sponsored corruption" has 2 too many words.
That's because you didn't use the car analogy. Namely, IE is the car, their internal to the computer directories are the driveway and their postal box, their internal to the network directories are the closest town and stores along normal roads, and anything with www uses the highway to get where it needs to. A vast simplification which can be wrong if you use an internal DNS, but otherwise quite correct.
This is a really really stupid decision when you consider that the number of american households reporting gun ownership rose from 41-47% from last year to this year.
And yes, I know a modern JATO rocket would immediately launch a car into the air, but the early gens were much weaker.
Only a redneck would strap a JATO to a car. Hell, Oak Lawn is nothing but rednecks and nuclear physics. Rednecks are perfectly innovative. "Hey Guys, Watch This!" is practically religious scripture among them.
Sorry, but even if true that doesn't cut the mustard. These are not souped up muscle cars with bog-standard braking systems, and even if true that the accelerator stuck the brakes would have been more than able to have slowed and stopped the car. All of the "malfunctions" reported continuous hard acceleration.
*blinks* You're not well versed in the effect of turbulence on localized airspeed or altitude are you? The sensors will report airspeeds that are only possible in a dive, combined with the loss of altitude even though the angle of attack is level or steady could easily cause software to attempt to pull out of the "dive". That assumes that the plane is allowed to override human input, which is a seriously fucking asinine design if true.
Which happens primarily because it's illegal and not taxed, and thus monitored, like every other profession.
They celebrate Saturnalia? news to me.
Hey, we still make some pretty decent zip ties.
I was unaware that the Ebil Dubya was calling for the genocide of all Muslims in Iraq. Thank you for the enlightenment
Also, when the cops are obviously corrupt and reading scripted lines in order to properly follow even Law one must resort to jury nullification.
Anathema to the concept of pure Law perhaps, but integral to the concept of Justice, which is by definition something more than just Law.
Yeah, I doubt there were many calc questions on a state standardized test. Hell, IIRC there's less than 20 on the SAT, at least when I took it.
Even if you do each part in order it's not exactly difficult. 100*75 is 7500. Half of that is 3750. 3750-225(which is 75*3) is 3525. 25 goes into 100 4 times, so multiply 35 times 4 plus 1 to get your final answer. More roundabout, but even people who don't deconstruct the problem entirely should have little problem doing it.
Because Fox News is really going to do a hit piece on Issa. You'd be much more correct naming the Grey Bitch, aka the NY Times because lo and behold, they DID publish a hit piece on Issa
http://conservativenewsreports.blogspot.com/2011/08/darrell-issa-hit-piece-most-inaccurate.html