Well, at the very least he's on the right track about the grid itself. If it weren't for the 50-60 split, they wouldn't have had to worry about power outages.
What the hell am I talking about? I'm talking about the fact that nobody's willing to rebuild our current grid, which would be necessary for it to handle a complete transition to electric vehicles. The technology is old hat but nobody wants to spend the money on it because it's boring.
It'll be old news because Google's already done it, but at least that would mean they've caught up to Google, without using anything "but a pair of video cameras and laser rangefinders, i.e. no GPS".
The point of having a cloud backup is that it's far removed from whatever local setup you have. If you have a cloud setup then it should be relatively simple to have geographically distributed backups/VMs/instances. Some PHB misunderstood that as cloud computing as being inherently more reliable and secure. Having a single instance in the cloud as your sole asset doesn't get you redundancy. You're an idiot if you believed otherwise.
...but right now, we have absolutely zero defense against asteroids. Why not keep it around as a last-ditch thing? If fired off early enough it might just give an incoming object enough of a nudge to just miss us.
Got cut off. Anyhow, if you want heavy-lift today, Proton gets you 45,000 pounds of payload up north. Beyond that, the Angara family is coming online in a few more years, getting you to 89,000 pounds. And if SpaceX is to be believed, they'll have a 120,000 pound lift ready for you around the same time.
The share price and earnings of a vendor doesn't help the IT department do their work. IT doesn't care about share price and earnings, as long as they're both positive numbers and not trending downward (meaning the vendor isn't likely to go bankrupt and thus leave them with unsupported product).
Slashdot Mirror
Software patents?
Well shit, I guess I still have malaria.
Well, at the very least he's on the right track about the grid itself. If it weren't for the 50-60 split, they wouldn't have had to worry about power outages.
I can't wait to go the gas station and pump newspapers into my car!
Maybe they don't want to pay more for the same system.
Sorry bub, inflation.
Wrong China.
What the hell am I talking about? I'm talking about the fact that nobody's willing to rebuild our current grid, which would be necessary for it to handle a complete transition to electric vehicles. The technology is old hat but nobody wants to spend the money on it because it's boring.
It'll be old news because Google's already done it, but at least that would mean they've caught up to Google, without using anything "but a pair of video cameras and laser rangefinders, i.e. no GPS".
Except this particular protest wasn't about Grant.
Whoops?
Femoral artery in the leg. Good job.
Actually the problem isn't even creating the power but actually delivering it.
Let me know when they get to handling pedestrians, traffic lights, cyclists, areas with different speed limits, yields, and turns in intersections.
If the government spent money on prosecuting companies that hired illegals instead of trying to keep illegals out, I suspect you'd get better results.
Oh, wait. I forgot that no party would want to do anything to harm the profits of the agricultural industry.
The point of having a cloud backup is that it's far removed from whatever local setup you have. If you have a cloud setup then it should be relatively simple to have geographically distributed backups/VMs/instances. Some PHB misunderstood that as cloud computing as being inherently more reliable and secure. Having a single instance in the cloud as your sole asset doesn't get you redundancy. You're an idiot if you believed otherwise.
It's 5x9 IF you pay for more than one instance. You DID pay for instances in multiple geographic locations, right?
Hook different pieces together? As a 9 by 4 by ONE monolith? That'd be pretty impressive.
That's all right, I read it as that three times, saw your comment, went back to the title, and still couldn't figure what was wrong until right now.
Strong frame means that the energy in a crash doesn't get dissipated through the frame but rather the contents of the car. Namely, the humans.
They don't have 9x4 pieces, unfortunately.
Solution: weld the cages shut. Alternatively, give him a few good punches in the abdomen.
...but right now, we have absolutely zero defense against asteroids. Why not keep it around as a last-ditch thing? If fired off early enough it might just give an incoming object enough of a nudge to just miss us.
Got cut off. Anyhow, if you want heavy-lift today, Proton gets you 45,000 pounds of payload up north. Beyond that, the Angara family is coming online in a few more years, getting you to 89,000 pounds. And if SpaceX is to be believed, they'll have a 120,000 pound lift ready for you around the same time.
The modern Soyuz-2 rocket has a payload of roughly 16,000 pounds from its current facilities. No idea where the 3,500 pounds is coming from.
Actually, if you share something in Reader, it will be shared on Buzz.
The share price and earnings of a vendor doesn't help the IT department do their work. IT doesn't care about share price and earnings, as long as they're both positive numbers and not trending downward (meaning the vendor isn't likely to go bankrupt and thus leave them with unsupported product).