Well, you've demonstrated your idiocy and low reading ability...
It was rather obvious the post was in reference to the past when I was in HS as well. The words "could have" and "used" indicate past tense. I guess you failed English class.
You cannot estimate the true cost of malpractice payouts, since those estimates only account for malpractice insurance. There is no way to estimate the extra cost due to defensive medicine.
No batteries. Inexpensive. High resolution. Withstands 6 foot drops and coffee spills. Easy to see. Integrated stylus drawing surface. No messing around with handwriting recognition that only works 90% of the time. No pokey built in keyboard. No need for an external keyboard. Tabable pages. Can use any stylus: ball point, gel, or graphite.
Paper pad cost: 75 cents PDA cost: $50 to $400 plus $2.25 for batteries.
You can steal intellectual property if it is information that could not be reinvented, guessed, or regenerated by a seperate party.
For example: company A generates performance statistics yearly for each employee for 20 years of operation. Each year's worth of data is unique and unreproduceable, obviously because no day is the same, no employee is the same, and the employee roster changes monthly.
If competing company B gains the information through illegal means, it has stolen the information because it would have had absolutely no way to independently generate this particular data set on its own.
Sure my example may be a little contrived, but the concept still holds.
> purely passive wardriving is NOT a crime. > now connecting to their access point and using their internet/network for whatever... that might be, i am not a lawyer, so i cannot say
Ahh.. so:
You're not a lawyer. You have no idea what you're talking about (you confessed yourself). And you're blathering on about what you think is law but may not be, by your reckoning.
Why are you here? Why are you posting? Why are you wasting time? Why do you even bother if you have nothing to add?
I am sick and tired of say nothing, know nothing, are nothing, fat-headed, little keyboard commando geeks spewing all sorts of drivel just to hear themselves speak.
Go home and talk to your dog. And enjoy an audience that might care to hear what you say.
"Driving down a mountain on the footbrake is only for the dumb"
And another thing... you're just plain wrong. A car engine is more powerfull than you think. People have driven into crowds when their car surged, even though both feet were slamming down the break....
"Your brakes should easily stop you from that speed once"
Ummmm... no. When you're doing 60-120mph and your brakes are fighting a surging engine, your brakes will overheat and become useless. In fact, your rotors will become red hot and warp when they overheat.
Brake overheating usually happens if you're driving down a steep mountain road and you hold the brake too long OR you're an Indy 500 race car driver...
Why not just put the gear in neutral? The engine will rev and might blow, but you could roll to a stop. If it were a newer car, it probably has an automatic shutoff when the engine is about to destroy itself.
Slashdot Mirror
I bet there's a whole bunch of you 4-eyed NERDS crying in your breakfast cereal this morning.
LOL
I failed the Slashdot message board.
You failed life.
Which is worse?
Dial 9 to get out of the office. :)
Well, you've demonstrated your idiocy and low reading ability...
It was rather obvious the post was in reference to the past when I was in HS as well. The words "could have" and "used" indicate past tense. I guess you failed English class.
"Don't you mean grade school?"
(the sound my phone dialing the FBI)
So, what you're hinting is.. you're a pedophile.
I got your number.
*beep-beep--beep-beep---beep-beep-beep---beep*
The girls locker-room...
*drool*
A generalization based on 0% statistical data and 0 references. Your comment is summarily ignored.
Why do so many computer nerds vote democratic down the line?
....drawing and resizing windows is so damned SLOW. WTF is up with that?
You cannot estimate the true cost of malpractice payouts, since those estimates only account for malpractice insurance. There is no way to estimate the extra cost due to defensive medicine.
Next!
I'm planning on leaving IT.. just plain sick of it.
Since they're old, they won't have to deal with the ensuing identify theft for long.. hehe
...works better.
No batteries. Inexpensive. High resolution. Withstands 6 foot drops and coffee spills. Easy to see. Integrated stylus drawing surface. No messing around with handwriting recognition that only works 90% of the time. No pokey built in keyboard. No need for an external keyboard. Tabable pages. Can use any stylus: ball point, gel, or graphite.
Paper pad cost: 75 cents
PDA cost: $50 to $400 plus $2.25 for batteries.
...it had the features of the $300 model and cost $75.
I just don't feel like buying an old model or paying $300.
I'd rather buy a remanufactured laptop for $300.
Drug use among children is lower than during the 80's
Afghanistan is a democracy.
Iraq is close.
You're either a:
dredlock wearing, tye-dye, pot smoking art student posting from his school library PC
OR
a class 1, grade-A, government approved retard.
I suspect the latter.
I hope Walmart really STICKS it too them!
You were a bit slow as a child... weren't you?
....has to rethink all the models of global warming.
You can steal intellectual property if it is information that could not be reinvented, guessed, or regenerated by a seperate party.
For example: company A generates performance statistics yearly for each employee for 20 years of operation. Each year's worth of data is unique and unreproduceable, obviously because no day is the same, no employee is the same, and the employee roster changes monthly.
If competing company B gains the information through illegal means, it has stolen the information because it would have had absolutely no way to independently generate this particular data set on its own.
Sure my example may be a little contrived, but the concept still holds.
Maybe now the credit theft problem will be fixed....
:)
You guys realize... TransUnion, Experian, Equifax are companies. i.e. vulnerable.
> purely passive wardriving is NOT a crime.
> now connecting to their access point and using their internet/network for whatever... that might be, i am not a lawyer, so i cannot say
Ahh.. so:
You're not a lawyer.
You have no idea what you're talking about (you confessed yourself).
And you're blathering on about what you think is law but may not be, by your reckoning.
Why are you here? Why are you posting? Why are you wasting time? Why do you even bother if you have nothing to add?
I am sick and tired of say nothing, know nothing, are nothing, fat-headed, little keyboard commando geeks spewing all sorts of drivel just to hear themselves speak.
Go home and talk to your dog. And enjoy an audience that might care to hear what you say.
It is quite irritating to be misquoted....
"Driving down a mountain on the footbrake is only for the dumb"
And another thing... you're just plain wrong. A car engine is more powerfull than you think. People have driven into crowds when their car surged, even though both feet were slamming down the break....
"Your brakes should easily stop you from that speed once"
"No brakes? They're stronger than the engine."
Ummmm... no. When you're doing 60-120mph and your brakes are fighting a surging engine, your brakes will overheat and become useless. In fact, your rotors will become red hot and warp when they overheat.
Brake overheating usually happens if you're driving down a steep mountain road and you hold the brake too long OR you're an Indy 500 race car driver...
Why not just put the gear in neutral? The engine will rev and might blow, but you could roll to a stop. If it were a newer car, it probably has an automatic shutoff when the engine is about to destroy itself.