I have run a wrecker company attached to a body shop in Florida and in some cases you *can* keep in the car if you accept payment below the cost the company has which is typically KBB. In other cases like Ford Expeditions they can get a LOT more for the car at the auction yard and will fight you tooth and claw to total it. It's not helped by the fact that people think the Insurance company is a govt entity because the law requires you to have Insurance.
The context here was some Ins companies automatically total the car if it's wheels have left the pavement, as well as any car older than 10 years for anything needing more than a minor paint job. I don't know about brand new cars like the Tesla, and who their underwriter was though.
Sorry, but no. It does NOT matter what "everyone" thinks something means. If they're too stupid or lazy to look it up, it's THEIR fault, not the one using the term correctly.
His point was dead on, and relevant to the discussion.
Nobody gets to decide the definition of a word as it suits them, and the definition of autopilot is most definitely going to come up in court proceedings as it relates to this case.
Insurance companies will total the car by policy of the wheels leave the ground. Some are more strict about this than others. Once the car is totaled out it's towed to a salvage yard where they auction the scrap off for parts.
It might, or might not, benefit the Insurance companies to make sure autonomous cars never have a chance and use this opportunity to look at the logs themselves first. They own the car the moment the owner releases it to them. "Totaled" is just a purchase offer.
Both have been trolling, but for a different purpose.
I have provided evidence to support my opinion, knowing it will elicit a response, hoping you might see reason while trying to determine what kind of person would care so much about what one person thought. Really weird.
All you have been repeating has been "your facts are wrong. You opinion is wrong, and your logic is flawed.".
Yet with your last response you have admitted defeat by attacking the least little morsel I provided.
You have perfected that action in this thread. I have been countering each and every one of your failed arguments.
is somehow proof that the government is doing illegal things
I never said the Govt was doing illegal things, you did.
confirms your conspiracy theories
conspiracy
noun a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. "a conspiracy to destroy the government" synonyms: plot, scheme, plan, machination, ploy, trick, ruse, subterfuge; informalracket "a conspiracy to manipulate the results" the action of plotting or conspiring. "they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice" synonyms: plotting, collusion, intrigue, connivance, machination, collaboration; treason "conspiracy to commit murder"
Nope, no Conspiracy theory. Prediction of an extension of an existing behavior to another Govt Agency, Yes.
Patterns, like history, repeat themselves.
This thread is what happens when two trolling boneheads insist on having the final word.:)
Going forward I know I am feeding a troll, but I will explain just in case you really have the IQ of a four year old.
In this context the companies are consulting with ex-cia. They aren't teaching the ex-cia guy the ex-cia guy is teaching them.
If you're teaching something you must have some level of experience prior. There's only two types of people in the world that I can think of that would have experience data-mining social media; SJW's and individuals acting at the behest of a Nations security or military agencies. What the CIA does is obviously classified, but it goes without saying that people coming out of Govt organizations with this kind of teachable knowledge that *just happens* to align with the objectives our Govt has been requesting it's not a leap at all to come to the conclusion that CIA has been data-mining social media.
U.S. Customs is just a late comer to the party that's already been going on that you're calling me a conspiracy nut over. News is out man, Go home, and go to bed.
It's red at sunset, at times. Right now, it's black
Well played
You'd never accept proof, anyway
Evidence based decision making denies most of our programmed societal social scripting . Most people that are presented with evidence choose to ignore it in favor of projecting the vision of their political world view. Like what kind of behavior to expect from someone based on how their dressed and what they do.
You distrus and hate too much for that.
I don't hate, but it's a dangerous world full of people like you. Distrust as the first social scripting to display is generally safer.
"Oh, you need my social security number, birth-date and mothers maiden name? No problem here you go!".
I was thinking the same thing about the invasive species of plants that could literally decimate our ecosystem or even potentially bringing hitchhikers in the form of snakes, spiders, fungi and other plant-threatening diseases that our flora and fauna would have no defense against.
While this is an 'enlightened' gesture it's a bad fucking idea.
A key factor in driving is looking ahead past the car in front of you and anticipating what's coming. Current systems aren't able to see past the car in front of the ( Operating on imperfect data ) and certainly lack the intelligence to anticipate something they cannot see.
Not only are you racist but you're uneducated too. Individuals aren't allowed to change history or the definitions of words to suit themselves. That happens over time and is called entomology.
We are just now starting to see the testing of autonomous vehicle cases in court. Even if this isn't an autonomous vehicle, decisions on these level of cars will be used as a model when trying incidents where fully autonomous cars are involved.
Cry all you want. it's not racism but realism to profile. It's not about color but about the demographics of a population based on interests, passions, hobbies, etc.
Interesting that you thought profiling was about color. You bloody racist, go flog yourself!
It's amazing watching you whip yourself into a frenzy over an image of me entirely of your own manufacture.
Accusations are not evidence. You can project your delusions onto whoever you want but you don't know me and my opinions do not define me no more than the opinions or delusions of strangers define me.
I am of half a mind to meet you in person to see how it is you manage to function on a day to day basis but the language you have used fits the profile of an SJW, and those kind are very dangerous and should be treated like the boils on society that they / you are.
So with that I am going to sign off with some good reading for you to check out.
My guess is I have you spot on and it's probably going to piss you off more. At this point you have abandoned logic and reason and have spun yourself an imagined medical diagnosis of some random guy on the Internet and this conversation is bordering on entertaining for me.
Slashdot Mirror
Quantum theory would have them both right and wrong but how would that help us find the truth?
Don't forget the jobs posted by HR that reads like your dating profile.
This.
I have run a wrecker company attached to a body shop in Florida and in some cases you *can* keep in the car if you accept payment below the cost the company has which is typically KBB. In other cases like Ford Expeditions they can get a LOT more for the car at the auction yard and will fight you tooth and claw to total it. It's not helped by the fact that people think the Insurance company is a govt entity because the law requires you to have Insurance.
The context here was some Ins companies automatically total the car if it's wheels have left the pavement, as well as any car older than 10 years for anything needing more than a minor paint job. I don't know about brand new cars like the Tesla, and who their underwriter was though.
Sorry, but no. It does NOT matter what "everyone" thinks something means. If they're too stupid or lazy to look it up, it's THEIR fault, not the one using the term correctly.
His point was dead on, and relevant to the discussion.
Nobody gets to decide the definition of a word as it suits them, and the definition of autopilot is most definitely going to come up in court proceedings as it relates to this case.
Insurance companies will total the car by policy of the wheels leave the ground. Some are more strict about this than others. Once the car is totaled out it's towed to a salvage yard where they auction the scrap off for parts.
It might, or might not, benefit the Insurance companies to make sure autonomous cars never have a chance and use this opportunity to look at the logs themselves first. They own the car the moment the owner releases it to them. "Totaled" is just a purchase offer.
I agree that Political Grandstanding is bullshit. Especially your Sexist grandstanding.
Lets keep this within the context of a legal investigation and keep your sexist hogwash in the toilet where it belongs.
Both have been trolling, but for a different purpose.
I have provided evidence to support my opinion, knowing it will elicit a response, hoping you might see reason while trying to determine what kind of person would care so much about what one person thought. Really weird.
All you have been repeating has been "your facts are wrong. You opinion is wrong, and your logic is flawed.".
Yet with your last response you have admitted defeat by attacking the least little morsel I provided.
Are we done here?
You keep changing the goalposts.
You have perfected that action in this thread. I have been countering each and every one of your failed arguments.
is somehow proof that the government is doing illegal things
I never said the Govt was doing illegal things, you did.
confirms your conspiracy theories
conspiracy
noun
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
"a conspiracy to destroy the government"
synonyms: plot, scheme, plan, machination, ploy, trick, ruse, subterfuge; informalracket
"a conspiracy to manipulate the results"
the action of plotting or conspiring.
"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"
synonyms: plotting, collusion, intrigue, connivance, machination, collaboration; treason
"conspiracy to commit murder"
Nope, no Conspiracy theory. Prediction of an extension of an existing behavior to another Govt Agency, Yes.
Patterns, like history, repeat themselves.
This thread is what happens when two trolling boneheads insist on having the final word. :)
Going forward I know I am feeding a troll, but I will explain just in case you really have the IQ of a four year old.
In this context the companies are consulting with ex-cia. They aren't teaching the ex-cia guy the ex-cia guy is teaching them.
If you're teaching something you must have some level of experience prior. There's only two types of people in the world that I can think of that would have experience data-mining social media; SJW's and individuals acting at the behest of a Nations security or military agencies. What the CIA does is obviously classified, but it goes without saying that people coming out of Govt organizations with this kind of teachable knowledge that *just happens* to align with the objectives our Govt has been requesting it's not a leap at all to come to the conclusion that CIA has been data-mining social media.
Oh wow, look at this:
https://theintercept.com/2016/...
http://www.digitaltrends.com/s...
http://securityaffairs.co/word...
http://www.usnews.com/news/art...
http://www.commondreams.org/ne...
google: Cia data mining social media
U.S. Customs is just a late comer to the party that's already been going on that you're calling me a conspiracy nut over. News is out man, Go home, and go to bed.
Working with a former CIA consultant
You're reading comprehension is below 5th grade or you are one of those paid govt / political shills.
The facts are before you to draw your own conclusions. People aren't as stupid as you're pretending to be.
+1 Insightful
Oh hey look at this...
https://yro.slashdot.org/story...
We had another article where another federal agency was looking for information much like this:
https://yro.slashdot.org/story...
It's red at sunset, at times. Right now, it's black
Well played
You'd never accept proof, anyway
Evidence based decision making denies most of our programmed societal social scripting . Most people that are presented with evidence choose to ignore it in favor of projecting the vision of their political world view. Like what kind of behavior to expect from someone based on how their dressed and what they do.
You distrus and hate too much for that.
I don't hate, but it's a dangerous world full of people like you. Distrust as the first social scripting to display is generally safer.
"Oh, you need my social security number, birth-date and mothers maiden name? No problem here you go!".
I agree with this. You have the article in the summary. tl;dr
+1 Mod Insightful.
I was thinking the same thing about the invasive species of plants that could literally decimate our ecosystem or even potentially bringing hitchhikers in the form of snakes, spiders, fungi and other plant-threatening diseases that our flora and fauna would have no defense against.
While this is an 'enlightened' gesture it's a bad fucking idea.
The Sky is red. Prove me wrong.
A key factor in driving is looking ahead past the car in front of you and anticipating what's coming. Current systems aren't able to see past the car in front of the ( Operating on imperfect data ) and certainly lack the intelligence to anticipate something they cannot see.
Bah-weep-graaaaagnah wheep nini bong!
Not only are you racist but you're uneducated too. Individuals aren't allowed to change history or the definitions of words to suit themselves. That happens over time and is called entomology.
Standard SJW M.O.
We are just now starting to see the testing of autonomous vehicle cases in court. Even if this isn't an autonomous vehicle, decisions on these level of cars will be used as a model when trying incidents where fully autonomous cars are involved.
I am jealous you insensitive clod !
Cry all you want. it's not racism but realism to profile. It's not about color but about the demographics of a population based on interests, passions, hobbies, etc.
Interesting that you thought profiling was about color. You bloody racist, go flog yourself!
It's amazing watching you whip yourself into a frenzy over an image of me entirely of your own manufacture.
Accusations are not evidence. You can project your delusions onto whoever you want but you don't know me and my opinions do not define me no more than the opinions or delusions of strangers define me.
I am of half a mind to meet you in person to see how it is you manage to function on a day to day basis but the language you have used fits the profile of an SJW, and those kind are very dangerous and should be treated like the boils on society that they / you are.
So with that I am going to sign off with some good reading for you to check out.
Toodles.
http://www.nationalreview.com/...
http://www.philadelinquency.co...
http://www.therebel.media/_soc...
This last one is a good example of our conversation in regards to the co-opting behavior of Westen liberal nut-jobs.
http://wizbangblog.com/2015/09...
My guess is I have you spot on and it's probably going to piss you off more. At this point you have abandoned logic and reason and have spun yourself an imagined medical diagnosis of some random guy on the Internet and this conversation is bordering on entertaining for me.
Happy reading!