Slashdot Mirror


User: jhunsake

jhunsake's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
762
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 762

  1. Re: Yahoo spam filtering on Yahoo Boosts Email Space in response to Gmail · · Score: 1

    newsletters and such in the Bulk Mail folder

    Newsletters are bulk mail. I don't know why so many of you don't know that "Bulk Mail Folder" != "Spam Folder".

  2. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. on Yahoo Boosts Email Space in response to Gmail · · Score: 1

    mailinglist that I am on has ended up in the Bulk folder

    Uh mailing lists *are* bulk mail. Otherwise they would call it the "Spam" folder.

  3. Re:100mb? WOW! on Yahoo Boosts Email Space in response to Gmail · · Score: 1

    Well the folder is not labled "Spam", is it? There is a reason they call it "Bulk Mail", not "Spam".

  4. Re:I've read the paper and disagree on Is Finding Security Holes a Good Idea? · · Score: 1

    No, it points out what we are all well aware of. But since you think it's cute I'll post it to every Slashdot story from now on. Be sure to mod me up.

  5. Re:Sample Size? Two. on Testing ISP Censorship · · Score: 1

    FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER

  6. Re:Sample Size? Two. on Testing ISP Censorship · · Score: 1

    Nope. You don't censor someone by locking them out of your house. You censor them by locking them in your basement. Perhaps it's too "deep" for you.

  7. Re:I've read the paper and disagree on Is Finding Security Holes a Good Idea? · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What a generic response. This could be posted to any story, just replace "security" with another topic. I can't believe moderators fall for this shit.

  8. Re:Don't buy it on Is Finding Security Holes a Good Idea? · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can be certain the script kiddies are going to find and exploit them.

    By the very definition of the term, script kiddies do not find holes or exploit them, they simply run the exploit scripts.

  9. Re:Google is teh friend on Is Finding Security Holes a Good Idea? · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You're a whore.

  10. Re:Sample Size? Two. on Testing ISP Censorship · · Score: 1

    they didn't kill him, they locked him up temporarily. when the law proved that he was innocent to post the content, he will be/was released. this is no big deal!

  11. Re:Well duh on Is the Linux Desktop Getting Heavier and Slower? · · Score: 1

    Uh, you just stated a fact that we are well aware of. Yet it has absolutely nothing to do with the parent post.

  12. Re:Bite the bullet and buy the damn thing on SCO Says No Way To a GPL Solaris, Moves Trial Back · · Score: 1

    It would probably cost IBM more like $200mil. When you start buying stock, the price tends to go up. Then they'll have to submit a proxy offer. Not to mention all the lawyer fees, etc.

  13. Re:Bite the bullet and buy the damn thing on SCO Says No Way To a GPL Solaris, Moves Trial Back · · Score: 2, Insightful

    buy the bastards

    That's probably exactly what they want.

    what a dumbass Darl was

    Yeah, he'll be a dumbass when he's laughing all the way to the bank.

  14. Re:Competition? on Microsoft, Sony Announce iPod Competitors · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uh yeah, you just made the same joke. Dumbass.

  15. Re:In two words... on Environmental Concerns for a Server Room? · · Score: 1

    That's about informative as

    Yes and yes. Absolutely is an issue.

  16. Re:One Up-manship on AgroWaste Oil Plant Starts Production · · Score: 1

    Agreed also. Now where can I buy one of those?

  17. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. As I said, axioms are never proved are disproved.

    I could create a system with 2 axioms:

    1. S
    2. ~S

    Of course now I can prove anything using that system, but that is beside the point. An axiom is something that is true, by definition.

    Perhaps you're thinking of hypothesis or conjecture?

    For lots of fun, take a mathematical logic course. I can't get enough of that shit.

  18. Re:getting around the IP blocks on Fedora Core 2 Officially Available · · Score: 1

    There are others, and be warned that Dag Wieers and Axel Thim (atrpms) are in a pissing match over Dag obsoleting at least one of Axel's packages for naming it "wrong". (look at the April acrhives of the freshrpms mailing list with some fresh popcorn).

    What is the thread title? I see no significant discussion between Dag and Axel.

  19. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    Maybe to you it's a connotation, but a lot of us prefer to use the correct meaning.

  20. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    There is an error in your analysis.

    A large portion of Americans believe it.

    That says that a large portion (whatever that means) of Americans believe a certain thing.

    It doesn't provide any justification. It is entirely possible that he asked every single person in America, and they all told him the truth.

    What you are saying is that because a vast majority of the african-american people at my school are loud-mouthed and annoying, I have the right to say that (please noone take offense, I don't believe this at all) blacks being big-mouthed fucktards is a statistical reality.

    No, that's not what he's saying at all. You're talking about statistical inference, which he doesn't use at all. He provides no justification whatsoever, no statistical inference, nothing. Thus all you had to say is: "Please justify your statement."

  21. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    Actually if you look at the history of mathematics, axioms were "created" whenever the mathematicians needed them to continue on.

    Thus axioms are created when they are needed. And that one guy is doing exactly that. He needs God, so he creates the axiom that there is one. Of course, now much of what he deduces can't be deduced by those that don't accept that axiom into their logic.

  22. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    You don't prove or disprove axioms.

  23. Re:Familiar pair for atheists. on Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus · · Score: 1

    You obviously don't know the definition of "correlation coefficient", nor that a correlation coefficient of 1% could be the highest.

  24. Simple Solution on Dealing with Directory Dilemmas? · · Score: -1, Troll

    Quit your job.

  25. Re:Please... kill me now on Record Labels Push for iTunes Price Hike · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm betting you were a hall monitor in school, you piece of shit.