Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Boosts Email Space in response to Gmail

coleslawjoe writes "This article at New York Times explains that Yahoo has decided to boost their E-mail space (Soul sucking registration required) from their current 4 megabytes to 100 in response to Gmail. They are also planning to offer 2 gig mailboxes for $19.99(USD)."

707 comments

  1. How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Automatically delete messages over a certain age.

    The only reason people keep them around is that they're too lazy to delete them themselves. Not because they want to refer back to them.

    It's a hell of a lot more irritating that email doesn't get through because your mailbox is full then it is if you lose the email of the latest oversized video file people were sending a year ago.

    1. Re:How about instead... by jomas1 · · Score: 1

      " Automatically delete messages over a certain age. The only reason people keep them around is that they're too lazy to delete them themselves. Not because they want to refer back to them. It's a hell of a lot more irritating that email doesn't get through because your mailbox is full then it is if you lose the email of the latest oversized video file people were sending a year ago." That would work nicely with accounts you check infrequently if you had the choice of "locking" some messages from being auto-deleted.

    2. Re:How about instead... by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The only reason people keep them around is that they're too lazy to delete them themselves. Not because they want to refer back to them.
      Speak for yourself! I do deliberately keep my email, and it pisses me off no end when I get some sort of hard disk crash that causes me to lose old archived email.

      Yahoo gives a warning when your mailbox reaches a certain size anyway, so it's easy to do some quick maintenance like delete that email with the absurdly large attachment to get the space back. But 100megs will certainly help.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:How about instead... by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thats not totally true. Sometimes I keep old e-mails for reference (i.e. any online purchases), contacts, etc. Yes I could transcribe them, but I would prefer, at times to keep the e-mail and should have the right. I do not think it is a solution to just delete emails that are old.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:How about instead... by dghcasp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The only reason people keep [email] around is that they're too lazy to delete them themselves.

      Bullocks.

      There's lots of reasons people keep their email around basically forever... Some quick examples:

      • License keys
      • Particularly nice or significant email messages
      • Evidence that someone actually said something & can't deny it later
      • For future reference

      Or are you one of those Dilbert-esque PHB's who have your secretary print all your emails, file them in binders, then keep them under lock & key until you forget the key?

    5. Re:How about instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    6. Re:How about instead... by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      until you forget the key?
      It was an electronic key that was stored in his e-mail box. Unfortunately due to the expiration of his e-mail, the key was deleted and now he can't access any of his e-mails.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    7. Re:How about instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> Particularly nice or significant email messages
      > Never got one I wanted to keep yet.

      i think this says it all, really.

      I'm sorry to hear that; I really am.

    8. Re:How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I take it you record conversations.

      Otherwise, what do you do with particularly nice or significant talks?

    9. Re:How about instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yahoo has done this for a while, create a folder and put anything you want to save in the folder.

    10. Re:How about instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Perhaps you should consider that for many thoughtful e-mails from loved ones are worth cherishing. I doubt that's just me.

      Personally, keeping old archives has saved my butt in the past!

    11. Re:How about instead... by boaworm · · Score: 4, Funny


      I do deliberately keep my email, and it pisses me off no end when I get some sort of hard disk crash that causes me to lose old archived email.


      Hey! someone found a problem to your solution just recently. Its called "Backup". A revolutionary new technology that allows you to make a copy of your data to a non-volotile memory "device", such as a tape or compact disk. The technology even supports you bringing the "device" offsite so it survives fires/burglaries etc
      Amazing, huh ? :)

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    12. Re:How about instead... by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      or hotmail: i found out the hard way when i tried to login to my account and saw a msg of something like "An account has been reserved for you!". Very cool indeed - not! Where's my older mail? Trashcan? Nope. Permanently gone. If the new GMail has a similar policy, then the 1GB deal isn't going to do it for me. What i'd really like to see is a no-time-limit account with a smaller storage for example.

    13. Re:How about instead... by inkedmn · · Score: 1

      I've got emails that my wife sent me when we first started dating, I don't ever plan on deleting those.

      Though, there is something to be said for allowing freakin' pop access so we could archive our own mail...

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    14. Re:How about instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullocks.

      There's lots of reasons people keep their email around basically forever...


      Buffalo.

      I disagree with your assertion.

    15. Re:How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes? If they like me that much, they'll go to my POP3 account, not my disposable webmail.

    16. Re:How about instead... by Malc · · Score: 1

      "Bullocks"

      Oxen? Perhaps you meant "bollocks"?

    17. Re:How about instead... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      While I'm posting in this thread, I have to ask the question: Have we Slashdotted Yahoo?

      Or is it just those of us in Florida that's having "issues" connecting to Yahoo this (EDT) morning?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:How about instead... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      And were everyone like you, that would work well.

    19. Re:How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh,come on. How many people seriously expect their webmail to last more than a few months?

    20. Re:How about instead... by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      uhm......lots, many people don't have/use pop3 and if they're gonna trash a webmail account then they can forward any mails they want to keep.....

    21. Re:How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      They evidently have a lot more faith in dotcoms than I have.

    22. Re:How about instead... by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      That's because Hotmail requires you to log in at least once every 30 days to keep your account active. Gmail's policy is 6 months, which is quite a bit more reasonable.

    23. Re:How about instead... by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      The only reason people keep them around is that they're too lazy to delete them themselves.

      Speak for yourself, buddy. I have archived email going back to about 1998. A lot of it is work-related and of limited value as a technical or "how did I do that before?" resource.

      Some is receipt-based mail either for bill-paying or eBaying. Some is personal, and a lot of fun to re-read and reminisce over.

      Do I need close to a gig of email and attachments? Probably not. But two CD-Rs cost a whopping dollar and I can easily move them from machine to machine if I want them live.

      Hell, if anyone knows an easy way to get email out of GroupWise's archive and into Outlook .pst format, I'd be indebted!

      GTRacer
      - Novell supporting Linux doesn't excuse GroupWise

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    24. Re:How about instead... by dvc5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I believe we have /.'ed yahoo. I can't connect to the web-interface either. The pop servers are still responding though.=)

      --
      #define NULL rand() /*heh heh heh */
    25. Re:How about instead... by Stregone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://yahoopops.sourceforge.net/

    26. Re:How about instead... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Surprised me there, no Yahoo hasn't been deleting mail, I still have mail from April 2002, which is the time Yahoo! stopped offering free POP3 downloads, I like keeping my emails, this 100 MB limit is surely a nice surprise. :) . You may be confusing it with Hotmail, which has deleted mail.

      On the other hand, ick, the new interface is ugly, with any colour scheme.. It's probably the blue links and the buttons, that contrasts too much.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    27. Re:How about instead... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Many many people. I fully expect it to last longer than my domain really... no sign of Yahoo dying anytime soon.

    28. Re:How about instead... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Really?

      How often do Yahoo back up their server? Do they keep offsite backups? What guarentees do they offer that your email will not be deleted?

    29. Re:How about instead... by Drawkcab · · Score: 1

      CDs don't last forever. Tape backups are overkill for the average consumer who isn't conducting important business with their home computer. Its hard to really say what will stand the test of time without testing for a few decades, but I have a stack of old hard drives that still work fine, and I have lost several CDs over time. One even exploded in a CD drive, destroying both. If you need 20 CDs to back up important data, you only need 1 to fail to defeat the archive, and its inevitable that 1 will fail eventually. Using a web based email service has a number of built-in convenience. One of them is automatic backups. Another is being able to easily check email from any computer.

    30. Re:How about instead... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I didn't say it was guaranteed, and I wouldn't dream of storing vital e-mail on it with any degree of security, but that doesn't mean I don't expect it to be there for a period of time.

      Even if I wouldn't expect it to outlast my own domain and server (which is up to me really I suppose), the chances are good that it will outlast most peoples' ISP e-mail accounts.

    31. Re:How about instead... by Compumyst · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I keep them around, but I've still got the welcome emails from yahoo mail, and geocities (back before those two merged).

      I don't know that I'll ever need a gigabyte of storage space - 100 MB is really pushing it for me, but at least I know that all that junkmail that I keep getting won't completely render my address useless (after letting it sit for a week or two). And now with the larger attachment size, maybe I can use it more as a storage space than "Yahoo! Briefcase" (which by the way is only 30 MB).

      --
      What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
      Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
  2. not all accts upgraded yet? by polymorpheus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like only 2 of my 3 Yahoo! accounts got the boost overnight? Anyone know more details about the rollout? polymorpheus

    1. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      My upgrade just happened five minutes ago. I'm in Korea. Perhaps where your server is located will determine this.

    2. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by endx7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like only 2 of my 3 Yahoo! accounts got the boost overnight? Anyone know more details about the rollout?

      My old yahoo account still has 6 megabytes. Yes, I got it back in a time when they gave you 6, not 4 meg. It hasn't gotten upgraded to 100 meg yet. (I didn't even know they had started doing the upgrade yet).

    3. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened to me. My oldest account (a 6MB one) and my newest account both got upgraded, but the middle one did not.

    4. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Paster+Of+Muppets · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, mine happened sometime between 0300 this morning and 1300 this lunchtime (it's currently 1423 here). Interestingly, the e-mail Yahoo! sent about the upgrade said mine would be upgraded tomorrow (16th).

      --
      Due to lack of disk space this user has been discontinued
    5. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by evil+crash · · Score: 0, Troll

      Only one of mine has been so far.

      --
      "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."-THG
    6. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      They didn't announce it ahead of time, as far as I know... like you, my old one had 6 MB of space, my new one had 4. Upgrade happened to the new account this AM at, oh, 8-ish Eastern US time.

      Funny thing is, I just scored my gmail accounts and was looking forward to using it more than Yahoo. Question remains... who has the better uptime, usability and spam blocking? Time will tell.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    7. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by FatalTourist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's the trick. Sign out and then sign back in. Went from 6MB to 100MB in seconds!

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
    8. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      IIRC mine had 10 meg when I signed up, back in 1997, but it was cut to 6 at some point.

    9. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Tedger · · Score: 1

      I also signed up when it was 6 not 4 and I have the new 100MB ...

    10. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by brian+ferullo · · Score: 2, Informative
      my six meg account got a pretty humorous quota warning last night:

      Hello [me],

      You are currently exceeding your Yahoo! Mail storage quota by a very large amount. You are only allowed -2048.0MB of storage but you are currently using 0.3MB of storage. Your account has been temporarily disabled from receiving new messages.

      now i know why :)
    11. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I sent Yahoo tech support an email asking if they'd updated their bot scripts or something.... I guess they did.

      See also this story on the Reg.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    12. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by sabshire · · Score: 1

      You remember incorrectly... I got mine in 1997 (January), and it had 2mb then. They later upgraded it to 4, and then to 6. No everyone got the 6mb change immediately... only those that had the service for a while.

      --
      You will never "find" time for anything. You must "make" it.
    13. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am in Switzerland and my upgrade working quite slow..
      so far i can only upgrade 2 yahoo emails

    14. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by acaird · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I clicked "Check Mail" at around 13:00 EDT and got the message below. Apparently they were tired of waiting for me to log out and back in. Oddly, though, I logged in at about 8:30 EDT, had 6MB (yeah, old account). After clicking through the message below, I still had 6MB. After logging out and back in, still 6MB. And the interface I see (classic vs. "WinXP-looking") varies, apparently by the cache server I hit. Great news - Yahoo! Mail is new and improved!
      Thanks for being a loyal Yahoo! Mail user. To ensure that Yahoo! Mail continues to be the easiest, most enjoyable way for you to stay in touch, we've made several great improvements to your service! In addition to all the features you currently enjoy, we've made these upgrades:
      * Streamlined interface
      Makes using your mail even easier
      * 100MB of email storage
      Keep more of the things that are important to you - without worrying about bumping up against your storage limit.
      * Message size up to 10MB
      Send monster-sized files - photos, presentations, whatever!
      So thanks again for choosing Yahoo! Mail to keep in touch, and we hope you enjoy the additional services now at your fingertips. For more information, please visit our Help page.

      --
      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely. E. Tufte
    15. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by dickens · · Score: 1

      Where on earth did you find the address for Yahoo tech support?

    16. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      got mine!

      10MB max size email (including attachment) is nice addition.

    17. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      OK, it was a web form.... I don't remember exactly where I found it, though... sorry

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    18. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by pyro916 · · Score: 1

      Hum, I have the premium service already, the first two times I tried to log in it says "not valid user id" kind of odd. I also notice the little bar in the corner that says my mail box is %60 is gone. Now the question is what do I do with these 2 gigs I have?

    19. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      yup!

      I signed up in 1997 also.... and it was 10 then. It went to 4 - then to 6. New accounts were then only available with 4. Now 100.... but its slow as heck.

    20. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this moderated as a troll? Bunch of fuckin crackheads.

    21. Re:not all accts upgraded yet? by LC+Gundo · · Score: 1
      I eventually got the same message you did, but check out the message I got a few hours before that. By the way I was waiting for a confirmation e-mail on some tickets I ordered from a ticket agency when the following message came in.

      Hello xxx @sbcglobal.net,

      You are currently exceeding your Yahoo! Mail storage quota by a very large amount. You are only allowed -2048.0MB of storage but you are currently using 1.3MB of storage. Your account has been temporarily disabled from receiving new messages.

      The easiest way to continue receiving your important email is to expand your mailbox. Yahoo! Mail offers 10, 25, 50 and 100MB of storage space starting at just $9.99/year. Click here now to order Extra Storage.

      If you are not interested in Extra Storage, you will need to delete some of your email. You may want to start with older email, or email with large attachments. Please remember, however, that once you delete a message, it is gone forever. [snip]

      Any of you guys able to figure out how many messages I'd have to have deleted to get my storage down from 1.3 MB to -2048 MB in my then 100 MB account?

      BTW, I never received the ticket confirmation and it's a three hour drive to the venue.

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
  3. And POP forwarding and access by thammoud · · Score: 1

    eom

  4. 100mb? WOW! by Apage43 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why ever would I want a whole gigabyte? I'll just go to yahoo and get one-hundred entire megabytes of wonderful inbox space, on a page riddled with graphical advertisements. This is so much better than a gigabyte of inbox space, on a page with text ads. I'll tell all my friends about Yahoo!'s new, awesome offer.

    1. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All superficial jabbing aside... The 100 megs is here ~today~, coupled with some of the best spam-filtering available, and without some of the privacy issues that will cause problems for gmail overseas.

      I'll take "Free existing cool service" over "Free theoretical awesome service" any day.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    2. Re:100mb? WOW! by MonTemplar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course, everyone and their dog can apply for a Yahoo! Mail account right now. GMail is still in beta at the moment. Yeah, I know, kind of spoils your joke, and you put so much effort into it too... :D

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
    3. Re:100mb? WOW! by sapped · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, for paying customers they have removed the adverts as well.

      Thus, right now, today, I am sitting with a 2 gig mailbox with no adverts. Google will have to get their product out the door sharpish to overcome the inertia that Yahoo is creating right now.

    4. Re:100mb? WOW! by freaksta · · Score: 0

      Troll. Yahoo has an excellent page layout with an even better spam filter. That combined with fast page loads and a great uptime makes yahoo my webmail provider. Hotmail is the devil. Gmail aint free. Yahoo's 100 megs + 10meg email limits are a great free offer! I was quite happy to login today and see that I had extra space. I think your really missing the Yahoo! advantage.

      --


      Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
    5. Re:100mb? WOW! by Ramses0 · · Score: 1

      I've been a mail plus subscriber for a while now (used to be 6mb, then got tired of deleting all my old messages). This was waaaay before google / gmail was even a twinkle in somebody's eye. Since then, yahoo has tended to treat their paying mail customers right. They were this first with baysian filtering (for paying customers), have this neat thing called "address guard" where you can have up to 500 address-something@yahoo.com, (-something is configgable), etc. (see antispam.yahoo.com for info).

      They may not be "first to the party", but I just got decked out with 2gb of email space, now if only their search functionality wasn't blindingly slow (at least it used to be, across my 25mb mail store that I *just* downloaded and removed from their servers).

      --Robert

    6. Re:100mb? WOW! by Plutor · · Score: 1

      > Actually, for paying customers they have removed the adverts as well.

      The operative word being paying.

    7. Re:100mb? WOW! by Mard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There were other changes to Y! Mail today that weren't announced, including an updated interface and an increased message size limit (was 3MB, is now 10MB).

      Yahoo also recently decided that any messages that get filtered to your Spam folder no longer count towards your maximum email limit - a change that had a HUGE impact on how often I have to check my email. I have a 6mb free yahoo account, for some reason, but would have to check my mail daily to prevent any legitimate mail from being blocked when my box filled. Since the change, I haven't seen my limit go up by 1% :)

      With 100MB and this new rule, I definately wouldn't have to leave Yahoo! Mail for lack of space. However, there are plenty of reasons I'll be moving to gmail upon release anyways. Yahoo, if you're listening, here goes:

      1) Large and Obnoxious flash ads. These should have died with the dotcom era.

      2) When switching accounts, for instance when my mother checks her email, I have to first click the [Logout] link, then I have to click your "Return to Yahoo! Mail"-link in order to enter the new login info. Of course this page has many ads, all of which I ignore. I'm not changing logins so that I can save 25% on car insurance, or whatever you seem to think I'm interested. I've never intentionally clicked on a single one of your ads, btw.

      3) I have to enter my password once a day? My computer is secure, so feel free to save my password for the next 30 years if you'd like. Or at least give me the option to do so, because that's what I would like.

      4) The stability this morning was crap :) Not sure if that is from them updating or what, but it was annoying enough.

      5) The new color scheme on the front page is, for lack of a better word, gay (it's light purple, ffs). The rest of the 'new' UI is... pretty, but I don't see any changes besides rounder triangles.

      All of this aside, the one major improvement that would make me consider switching to any mail service is an improvement over my current spam detection rate. It's at about 95% blocked now. If any other webmail services can improve on that without more false-positives, I'm sure they'll make plenty of devoted fans.

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    8. Re:100mb? WOW! by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know already has a gmail account, hardly theoretical. Invites are flooding the net (part of googles campaign to stop people selling them on ebay.)

    9. Re:100mb? WOW! by mrvis · · Score: 1

      For a snide comment like that, I should take one of my invites, invite myself and get Dracolytch@gmail.com.

      It's not theoretical. And it's awesome for more reasons than the 10x space. Keyboard shortcuts, man!

    10. Re:100mb? WOW! by abertoll · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just a little incentive to keep their existing users. Most people already would rather not change their email address if they don't have to.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    11. Re:100mb? WOW! by Jahf · · Score: 1

      "some of the best spam-filtering available" has begun to rapidly decline in quality over the last few months. I used to get about a 1:1 SPAM:email ratio. Now it is closer to 6:1 and my usage patterns haven't changed.

      Yeah, I know it is at the core the fault of the SPAM'ers not Yahoo, but once GMail goes live I plan on subscribing to a new account on both and seeing which one does the best over WRT for SPAM. If it is Gmail I'll just hop providers.

      Will they care about one person switching? No ... but apparently they do care about droves of people switching or they would have kept their meager disk allowance.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    12. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know my dog has a Yahoo! account? Are you discriminating against computer savvy animals??
      FIDO WANTS TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH LOVED ONES TOO!!

      Animal hater. :D

      -- GNU/Anonymous Coward

      P.S. joke != troll

    13. Re:100mb? WOW! by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's a bit depressing if they really have the best anti-spam filtering. They do catch a lot of stuff, but they also generate a lot of false-positives. I use their SMTP forwarding service and bounce anything with the header X-YahooFilteredBulk. I get several people a month telling me that their messages were returned. This is the lesser of two evils because I would probably have missed their messages altogether if I were using the web interface and they'd ended up in the bulk folder.

    14. Re:100mb? WOW! by TheBigBezona · · Score: 1

      While true, those of who have DSL through one of Yahoo!'s partners get "Email plus" for no additional cost. With my plan, I can now have 10 2-gig accounts for "free". Doesn't really do me any good though - I run my own mail server and so have essentially unlimited storage.

    15. Re:100mb? WOW! by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      coupled with some of the best spam-filtering available

      Really? Is that why my girlfriend's Yahoo account constantly puts the announcements (an opt-in listserv list mind you) for our local young professionals organization into her "bulk mail" folder? No matter how many times she hits "This is not spam" (or whatever the button is called) it keeps doing it.

      Sorry but I'd rather have spams make it through then drop my legitimate e-mails. Yahoo's spam filter is a joke.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    16. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you bother to look at the Yahoo Mail interface. Click on the menus, and you will see keyboard shortcuts.

    17. Re:100mb? WOW! by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      That's what he's telling you. In reality he's probably visiting www.bitchesinheat.com using your credit card... :)

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
    18. Re:100mb? WOW! by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to get an account, and it's not obvious how to do so at all.

      I have a yahoo account *now*. I guess I could pay for a blogger account on the off chance that I'd get a gmail invite, but I doubt that will happen.

      Maybe ebay *is* the only way to get a gmail account, and I don't see why google has a problem with that, I mean, other companies see their free products up there (complete collection of cracker jack cards or whatever).

    19. Re:100mb? WOW! by Deusy · · Score: 1

      The 100 megs is here ~today~

      Makes you wonder how long ago they could have made this available, since they're only really upping it as a preemptive strike against GMail.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    20. Re:100mb? WOW! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So true. Their spam filtering is the best, and bulk email doens't count against your quota. The 4 mb limit isn't even really an issue now unless you want to send a file that is bigger than 4 mbs. 4MB goes a LONG way if you restrict yourself to text and links.

      The article said they are going to allow people to download mail to third party email clients. This is great! Yahoo seems to be saying: We don't care about the pittance we make off email banner adverts, we are willing to TRUELY GIVE you a larger mailbox than your ISP just to keep you using yahoo for other stuff.

      I doubt most people will use third party mail clients anyway: Going to a web page is easy, typing in smtp.yahoo.com into an email client ( what's that? ) is 'hard'. Plus most people would be pissed if they accidentally clicked 'delete from server' and couldn't get their email at their friend's house.

      Google searching email is a feature they won't be able to duplicate easily, but how useful will that really be? I for one wouldn't trust google's search algorithm to find all occurances of a string in web pages. For instance: I type A55M0NKEY ( a word that doesn't occur on the web unless I put it there ) and I do not find everything I have ever posted. If someone used 'A55M0NKEY' in a message, would google's search be guaranteed to find it? If not, then Yahoo could come up with a more-useful-for-email-searching-algorithm easily, and if it were also willing to store seperate indexes for each user privately, they would have a completely better service than GMail.

      Google has been the king of search almost since it came out. News, Newsgroups, Froogle, and Images are great. The features unique to yahoo have been the ones that require a login - email, IM, chat, personals, commerce, billionsweeps.com. The search engine changes so often, it's only intermittantly useful.

      Google thusfar has not required an ID for any of it's services ( except to post on groups.google.com, but most use of that is archive searching which doesn't require a login ID, who wants to reply to a 10 year old usenet thread? )

      Gmail gets people to create a google login. What else do you think they will offer now that they've got you to sign in? How much of that crap will end up on their front page?

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    21. Re:100mb? WOW! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2, Funny

      False positives on spam detection? What false positives? Clearly, they don't exist, because I never see them! ;)

    22. Re:100mb? WOW! by costas · · Score: 1

      Another thing not mentioned in the post: Yahoo has stopped counting Junk mail towards the quota. So 100MB of actual real e-mail is pretty good.

    23. Re:100mb? WOW! by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      Well, it would be pop3, not smtp.......BUT pedantic aside... can you imagine how useful it would be to have all your email forwarded to yahoo, have it perform spam filtering (for free) and then you pop3 in there so as to download your new clean email?

      It would certainly up the agenda in the spam filtering market.

    24. Re:100mb? WOW! by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      " The 100 megs is here ~today~, "

      That assertion is undeniably true, however it isn't too hard to get a gmail account. I got one yesterday from gmailswap.com which sounds like a porn site, but it is legitimate. The idea of the site is offer something unique or interesting (or interestingly mundane) and some kind soul will pass on an invite to you. Worked for me, and all I did was post a little humor.

      Have a look at my journal if you are interested in my methodology.

    25. Re:100mb? WOW! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Well actually it would be both. You need to specify your pop3 and your smtp servers. Pedantic and IMAP aside, that's a really good idea.... I'll have to look into that...

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    26. Re:100mb? WOW! by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      Don't have a gmail account yet? You could just ask for one: Gmailswap.com.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    27. Re:100mb? WOW! by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      paying = about $20 per year, and for global pop3 access and 2 gigs of storage, $20/year isn't bad at all.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    28. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The way I see it, you have two choices:

      1. Go for a free account, in which case you get what you're given.
      - In Gmail's case it's having them snoop your mail, placing "relevant" adds in strategic locations, on a beta quality product that hasn't been long-term tested.
      - In Hotmail's case it's having no storage and next to no decent spam protection
      - In Yahoo's case it's having banner ads that anybody using a half decent browser setup gets blocked anyway

      or

      2. Pay for an account and get upgraded with more storage space immediately. And in Yahoo's case at least lose the ads.

      I seriously can't see why people would need more than 100MB in the short term. It's a known fact that these companies want to keep their customers and will raise their storage amounts in line with their competitors to meet perceived need. If you really think you need 1GB of storage in the next few months, I'd suggest most of it is in attachments, in which case you're better off using a networked storage mechanism (www.xdrive.com, www.idrive.com).

      Or maybe the people on here so worried about having this sort of space are just wanting the world to know they have a big bad mailbox for no other reason than to have one.

      These people not worth anything to the mail companies (they're blocking their ads and don't pay for accounts, so are just getting a free ride anyway), so the companies not going to pay them much attention, are they?

    29. Re:100mb? WOW! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      I also have legitimate group emails getting routed to the bulk mail folder. You can set up delivery rules if you want though. Set that sender to always go to Inbox. I haven't bothered to do it yet because I only get one about every couple days and my spam volume is only about 2 per day.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    30. Re:100mb? WOW! by kpsimm · · Score: 1

      "Best spam filtering available" ?!? I can get over 300 spam messages A DAY. Most of it goes to bulkmail but most of the mail to my inbox is spam. I have no control over what Yahoo thinks is spam. I also have a fastmail.fm account with spamassasin. I'll load my Yahoo (pop only) mail to my fastmail account and it will catch the spam Yahoo doesn't AND I can control the spam sensitivity. P.S. Someone invite me to gmail, please!

    31. Re:100mb? WOW! by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      I run my own mail server and so have essentially unlimited storage.

      But not unlimited bandwidth for filtering spam...

    32. Re:100mb? WOW! by kpsimm · · Score: 1

      I have SBC DSL and thus have the upgraded Mail Plus. I am told I have 2G and no adverts but I still see BIG FAT ads in empty mailboxes (why have wasted space?) and the mail gauge still shows 25Mb total.

    33. Re:100mb? WOW! by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Likewise, who the F does google think they are, just because their IPO made them feel all cozy.

      I don't give a damn about gmail if I can't sign in. As far as I am concerned, it's vaporware.

      I'll tell you something. It's easy to have a great system with 10k users. When they have 85 million users, we'll talk again.

      Yahoo has been doing email for what, 6 years now? They're rock solid.

      Oh, and Orkut is also vaporware as fa as I am concerned.

      Maybe google should pay attention to apple and not release things until they are ready.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    34. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What graphical adverts?
      I use Adblock.

    35. Re:100mb? WOW! by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      Except for, generally, and I would assume in this case, free POP providers do NOT provide an SMTP server because of the potential for abuse. They simply tell you to use your ISP's.

    36. Re:100mb? WOW! by Lynxara · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the servers aren't having trouble dealing with higher-than-usual traffic the upgrade must be causing; I've had huge stability problems with trying to check my old account, which I did largely to see if the upgrade had affected it. I imagine a lot of other people are logging into long-neglected accounts for much the same reason...

      At least, that's what I hope it is. If upgrading to 100 MB is the cause behind the stability problems, then Y!'s not really doing much to keep me from being interested in Gmail when it goes public.

    37. Re:100mb? WOW! by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      True, but in my case, i have a domain name registered with free email forwarding. If i default forward all my domain's email to me@yahoo.co.uk, allow it to spam filter, and then have outlook pop3 my "clean" email from yahoo it would be fine. I can still use my ISP's smtp server to send email.

    38. Re:100mb? WOW! by cowens · · Score: 1

      Offtopic a bit, but how have you tuned Mail::SpamAssassin? My current setup catches most (say eighty percent) of the spam I get, but if I tweak it too much more then job offers tend to be marked as spam. The humourous thing is I forward my email to a yahoo account (to make it easier to check from my phone) and it catches half of what Mail::SpamAssassin misses, but thinks that some of the stuff Mail::SpamAssassin mark as SPAM is fine.

      my current setup is default +
      required_hits 8
      a mess of whitelist_froms

    39. Re:100mb? WOW! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Yeahbutt, I can send mail w/o an smtp server that will *probably* get delivered ( unless *their* mail server was down ). If the recipient can tell who sent it, than so can the free smtp provider who can then add the appropriate headers to allow it to be traced back to me ( Is there such a Hop log as part of SMTP? An 'open relay' that told on the originator doesn't seem like a security hole. You can always find out who to yell at... ) Also, there is a pop before smtp authenticate mechanism that exists, though I don't know much about it...

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    40. Re:100mb? WOW! by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      You haven't been upgraded yet then. I'm showing 2GB... haven't noticed ads one way or the other (Thanks, Mozilla!)

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    41. Re:100mb? WOW! by afree87 · · Score: 1

      "Theoretical"? I have Gmail. It's not theoretical, and its interface is far better than Yahoo's. I always hated their kludgy, slow hacks. Gmail, on the other hand, is fast and friendly.

    42. Re:100mb? WOW! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You KNOW it's bad when Yahoo!'s own filter marks all yahoogroups.com messages as bulkmail spam. All of yahoogroups.com lists are opt-in, by definition not spam...

    43. Re:100mb? WOW! by nairbv · · Score: 1

      Yahoo! doesn't include bulk email as contributing to your usage. Does anyone know if gmail does? I was happy to see my limit go from 6mb to 100mb this morning...
      I'm still hoping something like petmail will replace smtp email though.

    44. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt the need to buy my own invite on ebay when a customer gave me his email address as yadayada@gmail.com ... I knew I was behind the times.

      Best 35$ I ever spent, to be honest.

      So far I have sold 2 invites out of the 6 I have received on ebay, doubled my money that I spent on my invite.

      And after using Yahoo Mail for about 6 years now, my brain is trained to ignore the ads, but they ARE annoying when I notice them... usually the flashy blinking ones.

    45. Re:100mb? WOW! by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I'll take "Free existing cool service" over "Free theoretical awesome service" any day.

      Ah but for some people Gmail has made the transition from the theoretical to the real ;) I got a single invite from someone who works there, and now my entire family as well as a couple friends have Gmail accounts as a result of my own invites. Ask around; maybe someone you know has an account. Gmail seems to occasionally give people invites.

    46. Re:100mb? WOW! by alphaseven · · Score: 1
      The article said they are going to allow people to download mail to third party email clients. This is great! Yahoo seems to be saying: We don't care about the pittance we make off email banner adverts, we are willing to TRUELY GIVE you a larger mailbox than your ISP just to keep you using yahoo for other stuff.

      Yahoo used to offer free POP3 access but they stopped in early 2002. I guess they figured so few people used it they could charge money for this feature and not lose too many customers. I'm glad if it's changing back to free P0P3.

    47. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another advantage of going to a web page: It is MUCH better against virii. Even if they didn't have built-in virus scanning, it takes additional steps to dowload/execute malicious code.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    48. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I guess reality is in perception. To me, since I have no venue to aquire a gmail account, it's all mist and shadows. Of course, if you have a spare invite, I would be grateful. :)

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    49. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      What you have to understand is that from where I'm sitting, it's theoretical to me. From my perspective there is very little alternative to Yahoo mail for free web-based mail.

      Please don't knock my perspective when I don't have the opportunity to share yours.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    50. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I'm still really happy with it. I get a couple hundred spam a day, and only get about 5-10 in my inbox each morning. I guess milage varies depending on what lists you've been subscribed to.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    51. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Is that why my girlfriend's Yahoo account constantly puts the announcements (an opt-in listserv list mind you) for our local young professionals organization into her "bulk mail" folder?

      From your own description that mail fits the definition of bulk mail. That is probably why Yahoo tagged it as bulk. There is a difference between bulk mail and spam mail.

    52. Re:100mb? WOW! by jiawen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The new color scheme on the front page is, for lack of a better word, gay (it's light purple, ffs).

      Really? You couldn't think of a better word than "gay"? How about "ugly" or just "unappealing"? I find the use of "gay" to mean "bad" pretty offensive. I know that "gay" is becoming a negative word again, but that doesn't mean I have to like it -- especially because I'm part of the group that is usually considered "gay".

      Maybe you didn't realize that this use of the word gay is offensive. Please trust me, it is. Use "bad" or "uncool" or "terrible", but don't use "gay".

      Also, for what it's worth, my Yahoo mail interface is light blue, all the way. No purple in sight. (Too bad, since purple is my favorite color. :) )

    53. Re:100mb? WOW! by beta21 · · Score: 1

      5) The new color scheme on the front page is, for lack of a better word, gay (it's light purple, ffs).
      The rest of the 'new' UI is... pretty, but I don't see any changes besides rounder triangles.


      Sorry its so GAY to you but you can change the color scheme to something not so gay.
      I think Yahoo! anticipated that there would be a few "gay" ppl who would like the color scheme.

    54. Re:100mb? WOW! by SlartibartfastJunior · · Score: 1

      For their unpaying customers, like me, I now no longer can get the Yahoo! mail page to load properly, I can't view my email, and I am once again getting HTML mail (how many times do I have to turn it off?). Until they fix the bugs, I want my old email back.

    55. Re:100mb? WOW! by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Well the folder is not labled "Spam", is it? There is a reason they call it "Bulk Mail", not "Spam".

    56. Re:100mb? WOW! by saden1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thank Gmail for lighting fire under Yahoo! Without Gmail, Yahoo! would have been happy with the status quo. I'm still going to get a Gmail account for posterity but I'm now going to stick with Yahoo! as my primary email account in large part because of the mail limit increase.

      I also agree that Yahoo! has more experience. They have been good to me for the past 5 years.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    57. Re:100mb? WOW! by drc500free · · Score: 1

      Well, I've got me a gmail account... and the interface is wonderful. It's attractive, and very fast. It has a few dozen keyboard shortcuts, as well as some real cool ways of organizing mail (it displays "conversations" rather than individual messages).

      As for it only having 10k users... I'd say that google knows more about scaling their product while keep it incredibly fast than any other company. ever.

    58. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gay=don't stick it where it doesn't belong you diseased ridden troll

    59. Re:100mb? WOW! by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

      Certainly search works fast. They've scaled up over the last 7(?) years. But that doesn't have as many issues compared to a data store user information, mail (receiving and sending), and scanning for spam. Orkut certainly does not inspire any confidence about scaling. That's probably a few million users, while yahoo mail is supporting upwards of 100 million.

      Not saying they can't do it. But they haven't yet. Not saying yahoo does it well, but they're doing it.

    60. Re:100mb? WOW! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, I _CAN_ get to my gmail account right now.

      yahoo shows only a blank page. (yeah yeah, akamai net.outage. yeah yeah).

      gmail for me. I love my account.

      bye bye yahoo. you're a has-been.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    61. Re:100mb? WOW! by ioslipstream · · Score: 0

      So far, the search seems to work very well. I've forward all of my email from various other accounts to my gmail account (mailing lists, etc), just to play with the search.

      Gmail's search is very fast, and so far as I can tell, very accurate. I am most pleased.

      If gmail is this good right from the start, imagine a year or two or five down the road. If they stick with their own philosophy, this could be the last email address you will ever need.

      I for one, do not care about the privacy concerns. I have nothing to hide, but if I did, I could always send it as an encrypted attachment.

    62. Re:100mb? WOW! by STrinity · · Score: 1

      What you have to understand is that from where I'm sitting, it's theoretical to me.

      I do not think that word means what you think it to mean. I mean, by that definition you could say, "from where I'm sitting London is theoretical to me.'

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    63. Re:100mb? WOW! by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I guess I could pay for a blogger account on the off chance that I'd get a gmail invite, but I doubt that will happen.

      Unless you want to host images, Blogger's a free service. Just sign up, post "I am the walrus, I am the eggman" so your account will qualify as active and you should get an invite the next time you login.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    64. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change POP3 to IMAP and you have me sold.

    65. Re:100mb? WOW! by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

      Some days, yahoo groups mail gets marked as bulk. But usually when it gets marked, it's because I have mail that I forward to my yahoo.com account, probably because it's no longer coming from yahoo groups, but from an unknown IP.

    66. Re:100mb? WOW! by davez0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      a friend sent a gmail invite to my yahoo account and it got flagged as spam

    67. Re:100mb? WOW! by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

      I signed up, nothing so far, thanks though :).

    68. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new color scheme on the front page is, for lack of a better word, gay

      I kinda thought it was more nigger, but now that I look at it, it's sort of kike.

    69. Re:100mb? WOW! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Google will have to get their product out the door sharpish to overcome the inertia that Yahoo is creating right now.
      Yup. I've been pondering for weeks what it will take to my my email activity from Yahoo! to GMail (if and when GMail becomes available). For the moment however, I'm putting those plans in abeyance as the new changes remove the need to move.
    70. Re:100mb? WOW! by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Actually, to some philosophical views, the world is theoretical. It's all about perspective.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    71. Re:100mb? WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "4) The stability this morning was crap :) Not sure if that is from them updating or what, but it was annoying enough."

      Still isn't very stable yet... I have to click my messages 5 times each to get it to do anything...

    72. Re:100mb? WOW! by LC+Gundo · · Score: 1
      By the way, the Aussie version of Yahoo, yahoo.com.au still provides free pop access. I think they also offer smtp, although I use my ISP's smtp server.

      Hint, I used Melbourne (Postal Code 3000) as my home location when I registered (I really live smack dab in the middle of the eastern edge of North America's west coast).

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    73. Re:100mb? WOW! by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      When switching accounts, for instance when my mother checks her email, I have to first click the [Logout] link, then I have to click your "Return to Yahoo! Mail"-link in order to enter the new login info. Of course this page has many ads, all of which I ignore. I'm not changing logins so that I can save 25% on car insurance, or whatever you seem to think I'm interested. I've never intentionally clicked on a single one of your ads, btw.

      The real question is why your mother doesn't have her own user account on the system, complete with her own set of cookies and bookmarks.

      Then you wouldn't have to deal with that logoff/login nonsense.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    74. Re:100mb? WOW! by Mard · · Score: 1

      Actually, she does have her own computer, login, and cookies/bookmarks/spyware. Unfortunately, our router died this weekend, so I'm sharing till we get a replacement. I really don't see how any of this is relevant to the discussion, however :)

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    75. Re:100mb? WOW! by B5Fan · · Score: 1

      So am I. The buttons don't work and I get two javascript errors as the page loads. I tried posting a message from their Help pages (which work) and received a "turn on javascript" email. So I reposted with something like "** Javascript is enabled ***" and got the same email again.
      Right now I can't send email, or reply, delete, or forward.
      It was fine yesterday before they upgraded.

      --
      Borg:"Lawsuits are irrelevant. GPL3 is irrelevant. DRM is good. We understand security... Alert! MS are assimilating us!
    76. Re:100mb? WOW! by dennison_uy · · Score: 1

      Why pay $20 per year for a 2-gig email account at Yahoo, when I can just get two free accounts at Google.

      --
      Take off every 'sig'!
      All your 'sig' are belong to us!
    77. Re:100mb? WOW! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0, Troll

      and a full day later, and yahoo is STILL down.

      and gmail still works.

      isn't akamai supposed to be common to both? I guess google is just more connected and robust than yahoo.

      another annoying thing about yahoo - VERY annoying (is there a work-around?) - is that it does NOT play well with forms managers in mozilla. it never stores the password and I always have to type it in when loggin into yahoo mail. all the other user/pass CGI boxes I encounter DO use stable variable names (I think that's the key) for user and pass. so the forms mgr knows how to respond to the page and the user only has to hit enter. very nice. but with yahoo, it requires more typing and work. if I'm ok with storing passwords on my browser (it runs on freebsd so I'm pretty safe against exploits that might try to take local files) then the web service (yahoo, in this case) should NOT fight with me and force me to type stuff that other sites don't.

      again, bye-bye yahoo. and yahoo's spam filtering is horrible - they do seem to release usernames _somehow_ since some accounts that I created via yahoo but NEVER EVER EVER USED - still get spam. wonder why? I'll do the same with google and see if the account I create via them is ever spammed.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    78. Re:100mb? WOW! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      does gmail offer pop3 access?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  5. hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hrm...tough choice, i'd say. Heh, they are all going to be playing catch-up to Google for a bit anyway; hopefully we can see more (and better) deals in light of google bringing us such great things (like so many other company's have decided not to do, instead money-grubbing and pulling and biting and lying to get another dollar from you.

    1. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by polymorpheus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean "catch-up"? Gmail isn't even available to the public yet!

    2. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by SandmanCL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to miss out on one thing: gmail isn't even publicly available yet.

    3. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 0

      " You seem to miss out on one thing: gmail isn't even publicly available yet."

      And you seem to be missing the huge buzz going on about gMail. Big deal if it's not open yet, doesn't make any of the others that are behind any less behind.

      Look at it this way, if you have "good enough" product, but know that a competitor has one much, much, much, much better in the works (beta) AND you aren't working your ass off to beat them, then you are doomed for failure and not very bright to begin with.

      So yes, everyone IS behind gMail wrt to online email.

    4. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by fr0dicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt it. People don't like changing their e-mail address, any more than they like changing their phone number, and anyone stuck with 4MB will find the new 100MB ceiling massively bigger. Yahoo are very effectively protecting their installed userbase.

    5. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by hendridm · · Score: 1

      I logged in today and received a 2GB quota. I seem to remember them giving me a free Plus account when I cancelled my DSL. I like Yahoo's interface and the fact that they have calendar and a nice address book anyway.

      Can I trade in one of the gigs for IMAP access? ;)

    6. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by daoine · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It depends on how you look at the move. I don't think Yahoo is necessarily going to attract new customers with this model.

      However, with this move they're highly likely to retain their current paying customers. People who were paying for 20M get 2G for the same price. It's suddenly no longer worth the hassle to get an invite to Gmail, nor are you likely to move over once Gmail is public. Changing an email address is a pain, and if you were willing to pay before, you're likely to be willing to continue.

    7. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also get POP access. I was paying for just that really, and they merged it with this program. It's a nice change. No I won't have to delete messages from the server when I download to Thunderbird.

    8. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for one thing, the paid Yahoo mail service offers pop mail access.

    9. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Informative

      People don't like changing their e-mail address, any more than they like changing their phone number

      Here's a tip for those people: get your own domain name. Costs you about 10 bucks a year. The better domain name companies (like my personal favorite gandi.net) provide included email and web forwarding. That way you can keep the same email address for the rest of your life even when you switch mailboxes.

      Also, if you rent dns service, you can finetune your mail forwarding to have different email addresses on the same domain leading to different mailboxes. And if you've got an always-on internet connection you can make your domain forward to your home box through free dynamic ip services, like from dyndns.org, so that you could for example run your own jabber server, or have an ssh login permanently available where ever you are to access stuff on your home machine (which coupled with quickly downloaded sftp clients like winscp allows you to copy files over quickly and easily regardless of location).

    10. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling not many people will jump to GMail to have 1GB email rather than 100MB. Changing your email address is a pain in the butt.
      I don't think Yahoo will retain most of their paying customers, though. Most paying customers were paying for 25MB or 100MB which you have to assume was sufficient. Well, now that same amount of space is free. Why pay for 2GB when you don't need it?
      What I feel Yahoo's move will do is keep people at their service, at the expense of many paying customers opting for the free plan.

    11. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      I have three invites. first come first served. (replies to this post)

    12. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by wurm · · Score: 1

      I just had an employee spend $10 on ebay for an invite. It would be pretty funny to get one for free.

    13. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by fugas · · Score: 1

      If you are serious, that would make my day! You can send one to fu.asd@noonsoon.com

    14. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by wurm · · Score: 1

      I suppose an email account would help. try herr_wurm at yahoo.com

    15. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Id love one

      email: jallen@elliptiq.com

      Jeremy

    16. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      We are now out of stock of invites for the time being. The first 3 posts below have their invites sent to them!

    17. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by MirrorSpock · · Score: 1

      still have an invite available? I'd love to see what all the fuss is about

      --
      Logic brings Victory
    18. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by fugas · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much! Very generous of you. Will return similar favor if the opportunity arises some day...

    19. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by edyavno · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not just 2 gig that you get for $20 at yahoo, even though that's probably the best thing about the upgrade for the paying customers like myself. The reason I paid yahoo for email in the first place are the things like POP access, ability to use different identities when sending emails, no ad tag lines for the outgoing emails, disposable email aliases for posting to public forums. There are a few others, yahoo has the comparison chart here. Well, with the upgrade, I have to admit, gmail would have to come up with something extraordinary to convince me to switch. A few subtle differences here and there won't be worth it. Ahh, what a great example what good old helthy competition could do! :)

    20. Re:hrmmm 2 gig for $20 or 1 gig for free? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I happen to really like Yahoo, because they're the only service that has made good on the "single log on" promise that everybody was making years and years ago. I was thinking about switching to Google, but not now. 100MB is fan-fucking-tastic, plus I still get all of the good Yahoo stuff. Yahoo is integrated with my cell phone, I *love* their internet radio service (Launch), they're got a great calendar, messenger, etc. It's all in one very easy to sue package. I pay for some of their services, not others, but any way you slice it, Yahoo has got the portal thing truly figured out.

  6. no registration needed link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:no registration needed link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY Times articles that appear on Slashdot don't always need registration. It's sotra like the NY Times guys read /. and remove the requirement for the article so the gadflies won't comlain.

  7. Yahoo! is missing the point by ponds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What makes Gmail incredible and revolutionary is the search features, the amazing interface, the threading, the labeling, and the tried and true "google minimalism."

    Getting 1000mB's of space is just a side effect, that's there because gmail makes it desirable to archive multiple entire mailing lists.

    Yahoo! is missing the point.

    1. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...minimalism with 200k of javascript code.

    2. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      What makes Gmail incredible and revolutionary is the search features, the amazing interface, the threading, the labeling, and the tried and true "google minimalism."

      Getting 1000mB's of space is just a side effect, that's there because gmail makes it desirable to archive multiple entire mailing lists.


      Well having a Google quality search service, with a good interface, threading, labeling, and remaining minimal at the same time is kinda like dating 20 year old twins when you are 70. If it was easy, everyone would do it.

      Damn Hugh and Google...

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by jdreed1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What makes Gmail incredible and revolutionary is the search features, the amazing interface, the threading, the labeling, and the tried and true "google minimalism."

      Getting 1000mB's of space is just a side effect, that's there because gmail makes it desirable to archive multiple entire mailing lists.

      Yahoo, once upon a time, was also search engine. (Yes, yes, it was called the Yahoo directory, but it did eventually do crawling) And a pretty good one, too. (I'm talking back when it was still a Stanford project, like another search engine) It's not inconceivable they had a project like this on the back burner that's getting ramped up to compete with Google. Granted, I don't think they have a chance, just because of the way Google works, their strong desire for simplicity, and the desire to keep the ads out of the search results.

      What's most notable, however, is that Yahoo is doing this right now. And we don't even have a firm release date for Gmail. It's still in beta. If Yahoo is already scared of a beta service, that's saying something.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    4. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is "1000 mB's" (1000 millibyte's) part of that true Google minimalism?

      MB. Megabyte. Get your prefixes and plural forms right.

    5. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by Malc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before the web became so large, Yahoo had the best search engine too, beating all those like Lycos and Hotbot. Because of it's hand-crafted directory, it provided the best context for each site returned in a search, and it provided an easy way of finding other sites of the same type. What couldn't be found that way could be with a little more effort on Altavista. Of course, Yahoo still has their directory, but it doesn't seem to be nearly as useful today - perhaps that's credit Google and the quality of their search engine.

    6. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      What you get with yahoo is POP access. So, I can download the email into my favorite client where I also have search capability and privacy.

    7. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo definitely gets it.

      The problem is that most people don't. Yahoo has a huge user base already and they're trying to retaining it by going after Gmail's most notable feature -- the storage. So they're making comparable offers, including a premium service. The average Joe now thinks he's got it all. Is the interface and all that stuff worth telling everyone you know that you've switched email addresses? It's a real pain and not everyone's willing to make those changes. Keyboard shortcuts and threaded discussions are great for geeks, but you'd be amazed how little these features are used by the "average user." Walk around the office and look at people's Outlook and how they use it. They barely set it up correctly, never use keyboard shortcuts, always just put messages in chronological order, and are happy with their folders. Gmail's new features are not compelling enough to make it worth the hassle except for the possibility of getting the name that they want. Yahoo is also responding on this front by releasing 50 million dormant account names back into circulation, many of them early names that are easy to remember, like "mbsmith" instead of "mbsmith1532." Combined with the over-hyped fear of Gmail privacy issues, the average Joe might just want to stay where they are -- at least now Yahoo is a viable option for staying. Not everyone understands the new features that Gmail has, but everyone understands storage limitations.

      I've asked people if they want a Gmail account and half the time, I get the response, "Why do I care?" I think Yahoo was very clever in their response and it will be interesting to watch the two companies (plus Hotmail, because you know they're cooking something, too) battle it out in the next year.

    8. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      What makes Gmail incredible and revolutionary is the search features, the amazing interface, the threading, the labeling, and the tried and true "google minimalism."
      You forgot one other 'feature' of GMail, though it's niether incredible or revolutionary... Gmail is vaporware.
      Yahoo! is missing the point.
      Yahoo! is an existing service with hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of customers, a large percentage of which don't care about the GMail 'features' that the fanboys are drooling over. Giving them what they want (largely more email space and decent spam filtering) is hardly 'missing the point'. In fact, it's utterly brilliant timing and marketing as it removes one of the key reasons to consider a move to GMail.

      It's a mistake to believe that anything more than a fraction of the world's internet users are anything like the average slashdot hivemind unit (who make their decisions largely based on politics and dogma). Many people on the net *want* a portal with a single log and easy acess to multiple services and content. Yahoo! knows this quite well, and Google faces a tough road to attract this established user base.

    9. Re:Yahoo! is missing the point by ponds · · Score: 1

      Gmail is vaporware

      Funny how I was notified of your post by reading my gmail account, huh.

      If Yahoo! wants to give people an incentive to stick with an inferior product, that's fine, but what I was saying is that throwing a few megabytes around isn't going to make them comparable to gmail.

  8. I'll give you 4gb by alex_ware · · Score: 1

    if you give me your credit card number ;-) and your pphone number, address, ebay password
    oh and your soul

    --
    If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  9. big Surprise by joshsnow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Big surprise there. Yahoo need to do something to remain competitive.

    I'm personally waiting for gmail to come out of beta and then I'll probably move from yahoo to google locak, stock and two smoking spam filters!

    Offtopic, but why does google engender a warm fuzzy feeling of trust whereas yahoo, hotmail and the rest "feel" like corporates out to make a quick buck? It's a totally false feeling, but it's happens...

    1. Re:big Surprise by Donny+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >Offtopic, but why does google engender a warm fuzzy feeling of trust whereas yahoo, hotmail and the rest "feel" like corporates out to make a quick buck? It's a totally false feeling, but it's happens...

      Wait till they go public.
      Today while typing a personal (naughty) message to friends on Gmail, I did feel uneasy knowing that I'll be "profiled" by AI bots, so I toned down the language :-) Really creepy!

      Originally I wanted to use Gmail for my personal stuff ('cause it "never" goes out of date) and Yahoo for memberships, resumes, etc., but I'm thinking about reversing my decision and doing the opposite.

      Well, for all we know, Yahoo might be doing the same, but still, at least I don't know about it.

    2. Re:big Surprise by ThatNuttyPeej · · Score: 1

      I think it's because of the look and feel. Yahoo and hotmail pages look just like you'd expect corporate America to respond to a new medium/location/arctic refuge: fill it with ads!!!

      I think the fact that google looks like it was designed by someone who understood the web, and designed it for the web, makes it feel friendlier, or at least more appropriate.

      Ads, to me, are almost always the ugliest thing in any environment. I hate looking at my teenage relatives decked out in the logos of their favorite brands, thinking that they paid for the privilidge to be a Nike or an Old Navy billboard.

      --
      This sentence's period was stolen This sentence knows who took it:
    3. Re:big Surprise by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes "too little, too late." That and I get bombarded with over 200 spam mails a day, with filtering software that places my non-spam in the spam box!
      In the end, it is no different then what some companies do "Sorry this is our lowest price possible, this is cost." Consumer comes back a day later "Your competitor down the street is selling the product for $10.00 less" so the store says "we will match it." I generally tell the original store to F-off. Yahoo is not even attempting to match Gmail. While 100 megs is more then I need for email (even with the 4 meg limit i rarely ever hit that mark, only if someone sends me pictures) knowing that I have crazy space is awesome.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:big Surprise by darkfire5252 · · Score: 1

      Well, for all we know, Yahoo might be doing the same, but still, at least I don't know about it.

      Maybe it's just me, but I'm a LOT more comfortable having bots scan my e-mail to serve me ads when they announce their intentions before hand.

    5. Re:big Surprise by EisPick · · Score: 1

      but why does google engender a warm fuzzy feeling

      I'm not sure why this has to be a good guys vs. bad guys thing. It seems to me that both Google and Yahoo are good guys, focused on delivering good services to their customers rather than screwing over their customers -- especially compared to Microsoft, AOL, Verizon, SBC, Comcast, etc.

    6. Re:big Surprise by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but why does google engender a warm fuzzy feeling of trust whereas yahoo, hotmail and the rest "feel" like corporates out to make a quick buck? It's a totally false feeling, but it's happens...

      Maybe because Google is not out to make a quick buck.
      There's money in the technology but it requires Google to remain reputable.
      Somehow Google gives me the warm fuzzies and I think it's more that I can trust them not to sell my information cheaply. Any reasonable company considers their customers' information as an extremely valuable asset. Most any company could make a few bucks by selling their customer list, but would be very stupid to do so.

    7. Re:big Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Today while typing a personal (naughty) message to friends on Gmail, I did feel uneasy knowing that I'll be "profiled" by AI bots, so I toned down the language :-) Really creepy!

      I hope there are no spam filters between you and your friends. Spam filters actually read what you have written! How creepy!

      Yes, I'm being sarcastic. What, you think Google's programs are going to become sentient and then make fun of you for what you have written? Get a grip!

    8. Re:big Surprise by Yort · · Score: 1
      why does google engender a warm fuzzy feeling of trust whereas yahoo, hotmail and the rest "feel" like corporates out to make a quick buck?

      I don't know about everyone else, but for me it's little things Yahoo! does that are deliberately obtuse. For instance, I can't watch any videos from their "Launch" service because they do a browser check and won't allow anything other than IE or NS4.x. Absolutely stupid, but they refuse to change it.

      Other stuff seems less evil - I use their email service, for example. But it's just the difference in attitude that helps to elevate Google above the rest in my mind.

    9. Re:big Surprise by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Right. Because the devil you don't know is better than the devil you do. erm...

    10. Re:big Surprise by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1
      Yahoo is partnered with SBC in the southwest, so that dialup/DSL users have no choice but to have a useless Yahoo account (unless they do want it ... point is, no choice).

      Yahoo mail a good service? Yeah, if you like huge billboards all over your email. Very little raises my ire like emptying my trash folder, and going to a new page with nothing but the message "Your trash is empty, now." and the rest of the space filled with large Flash ads. This makes me have to go and do another click to get where I want - back to the inbox.

      This lowers usability, for the sake of large advertisements. A good service would try to improve usability (and therefore its reputation), instead of worsen it to sell ad space.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  10. Capitolism by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

    As always competition benefits the consumer. I am glad that Google raised the standard. I am going to sit back and see how far the storage wars go.

    1. Re:Capitolism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      That's capitalism. Capitol = seat of government as in 'Name all 50 state capitols.' Or a type of punishment as in 'Capitol punishment is reserved for the most dastardly of felons who have committed the most heinous crimes.'

      Capital = Money. Capitalism = he who has the gold makes the rules.

    2. Re:Capitolism by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Wrong, wrong, wrong. Capitol is the building, Capital is the city it is in. Capital is also money, you got that right. And your definition of Capitalism, can't argue with that.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  11. And increased attachment size by iapetus · · Score: 1

    Up to 10MB now, I believe.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  12. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we slashdotted yahoo mail. bad users, no cookie!

  13. 2GB Mailboxes by clontzman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not just a plan. My wife has a paid plan with Yahoo and she had 2GB this morning.

    I've gotta say, I think it's going to be hard for Gmail to compete. The Gmail Web interface isn't all that impressive and presuming that Yahoo and MSN can get their spam filtering and storage space up to snuff (Yahoo's got the space and the hotmail spam filtering is actually really good now), Google doesn't really have the breadth of services that the other guys do.

    That said, they're smart guys, so hopefully they're working on something better than what they're beta testing.

    1. Re:2GB Mailboxes by pbur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't all that impressive? Everytime I show it to people and show them all of the things it lets you do, they all start begging me for an invite. The Gmail interface is very utilitarian, much like their search interface. It also loads a *lot* faster than Yahoo!'s

    2. Re:2GB Mailboxes by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1

      I also got the 2gb plan this morning. I love Yahoo because I can get my e-mail anywhere that has a browser, and in my line of work, with more than three times as many features are Hotmail or AOLMail.

    3. Re:2GB Mailboxes by gauchopuro · · Score: 1
      The Gmail Web interface isn't all that impressive

      Well, I have not been graced by the good fortune of a gmail account, but here is a screenshot of my newly-upgraded Yahoo account. The interface does seem just a bit rounder, slicker, and more modern; and it's great to see my used space jump from ~80% to 3%.

    4. Re:2GB Mailboxes by fat_mike · · Score: 1

      I didn't get mine, and I'm a paying customer. Was it just there or did she have to contact Yahoo?

    5. Re:2GB Mailboxes by Smack · · Score: 1

      I guess it's OK if she already paid Yahoo, but for anyone who didn't, it's not even comparable.

      Free is infinity better than $20.

    6. Re:2GB Mailboxes by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Is it me or does yahoo's mail composer stink? I always figured that all those messages to mailing lists with incorrectly wrapped ">"s were coming from yahoo mail (&c) users.

    7. Re:2GB Mailboxes by Malc · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right. I just logged in and got this page:

      Welcome to the new and improved
      Yahoo! Mail Plus.

      Thanks for being a loyal Yahoo! Mail user. We've made some great changes to Mail Plus, effective immediately! You'll have all the features of your current Yahoo! Mail Plus account, and many more - at no additional cost*!

      Here's even more to love about Yahoo! Mail Plus:

      * No graphical ads
      When you're using the Mail web interface, your experience will be even more enjoyable.
      * Streamlined interface
      Makes using your mail even easier.
      * Virtually unlimited storage
      A whopping 2GB means you should never have to worry about managing storage again! Keep thousands of messages, photos, and documents - think of it as your online archive.

    8. Re:2GB Mailboxes by klui · · Score: 2, Informative

      3 things GMail has won me over Yahoo.

      1. No ads
      2. Email address completion works under FireFox, Safari, IE. Yahoo's completion only works for IE and you need to download a program.
      3. You can enable SSL for the entire connection, not just at login.

      Of course, there's no virus scanner and no import/export of contacts, but hopefully, Google will be taking care of this.

      All-in-all, GMail feels a lot like a standalone app while Yahoo (still) feels more like a web app (press a link/button, and watch the screen refresh).

    9. Re:2GB Mailboxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo is slow because of the Ads. Use a decent add blocker/filter and watch it fly. I'd do the same for GMail, given half the chance.

    10. Re:2GB Mailboxes by omicronish · · Score: 1

      Isn't all that impressive? Everytime I show it to people and show them all of the things it lets you do, they all start begging me for an invite. The Gmail interface is very utilitarian, much like their search interface. It also loads a *lot* faster than Yahoo!'s

      I have yet to see Yahoo's interface, but Gmail sticks almost all page functionality into a Javascript file. The HTML page you download merely includes that script, and contains a script to populate the page with your emails and other account-specific data. The page elements are all generated on your own computer, precluding the need to transfer them over the Internet, and significantly increasing performance (for me at least).

  14. Already in action.. jackson by greendot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I logged in this morning and saw the new user interface and the 2G limit. I've never had my yahoo mail down to 1% before. :)

    And another bonus is that yahoo does not count items in their bulk mail (spam) folder towards your quota.

    Now to fill up my 2G limit. I think I'll mail myself some CDs.

    1. Re:Already in action.. jackson by strictnein · · Score: 1

      I'm jealous of everyone who got their accounts boosted to 2 GB and 100MB. I'm still sitting at 25MB with my paid account. Wonder when they'll get to me?

    2. Re:Already in action.. jackson by strictnein · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I post this, and a second later my yahoo account has 2GB of storage... maybe that's the key? Complain on slashdot and get more storage?

      And no ads finally. I really don't like paying for sites and still having to see their banner ads.

  15. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by lintux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope, it seems that all sites powered by Akamai are unreachable right now...

  16. Soul sucking... by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    is a word better suited to Hotmail which still holds a tight noose around its subscribers, zapping them and their accounts everyonce in a while when the account goes above limit.

    I forked over 20 bucks the last year in to Bill's coffers but I dont plan to do so now that Yahoo and Google has services far better.

  17. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by SandmanCL · · Score: 1

    Yeah right. How many users do you really think slashdot has ? :-)
    There are world wide Akamai issues. Microsoft, Apple, Yahoo, Google, etc. are all affected.

    - Sandman

  18. I'm glad to see Yahoo... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...throwing down the gauntlet. I have had a Yahoo Plus account for a little over a year now, so I got my 2Gb space when I logged in this morning. At this point, Yahoo has the advantage of an online calendar (a great tool if you are a traveler)and the ability to sort your mail into folders. I also have a GMail account, mainly because it was offered to me. While the idea of that much space is appealing, I don't like not being able to sort my mail. Furthermore, I believe this encourages people to store documents online, a practice that is, IMHO, dangerous given the problems that Hotmail has had recently.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
    1. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by spyrral · · Score: 1

      You can sort your mail. They're called labels, and they are functionally the exact same thing as folders. The only difference is the added benefit that an item can have multiple labels at once.

    2. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      google has the search which is better than folders in most cases I think. If you really want pre-sorted stuff, they have "labels" that you can apply to emails, and then quickly get all the items with the label. This is pretty much exactly the functionality of folders. Except you can put multiple labels on an email, so it can in essence be in multiple folders!

    3. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      I personally find them to be much more convenient than folders. I'm slowly moving my mail over to my spiffy new gmail account, and I've mostly been using them like folders so far, but having multiple tags is VERY useful.

    4. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      Dude.

      Free Yahoo mail has filters that you can set rules for.
      Free Gmail mail has labels you can set rules for.

      Free Yahoo mail has a calendar you can use.

      What are you talking about?

    5. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I also have a GMail account, mainly because it was offered to me. While the idea of that much space is appealing, I don't like not being able to sort my mail.

      Interesting point. I think the Gmail designers intended labels as a way to sort emails. If you don't know what they are, they behave like real labels; you can attach multiple labels to a single email, and then perform searches by labels. You can also automatically apply labels to incoming mail depending on a set of criteria.

      The annoying part is that labels don't inherently provide hierarchy. You have to settle on a naming convention if you want hierarchy, and right now that's getting cumbersome for me. It'd be nicer if they had the concept of folders in addition to labels.

    6. Re:I'm glad to see Yahoo... by rodrigo_braz · · Score: 1

      The calendar is very useful, especially because it synchs with PDAs too (the only online calendar I know of that does that). I only wish the synch worked for the email too.

  19. Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by Badam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No one is happier than I that Yahoo is increasing my quota. I'm just about out of space, and don't want to irritate my friends by bouncing back their messages. My mom can get pretty pissed too.

    How long before spam starts including multimedia files that eat up the extra allocation? Now that so many people have broadband, there's no reason to stick to smaller messages. Emails may start to include much more advanced/annoying graphics, sounds and maybe interactive ad-games.

    --

    Check out my blog: My Galaxy is Milky Way Adjacent
    1. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by polveroj · · Score: 1

      But ad-games would be a sure sign that the email was spam. Most real messages have no need for interactive content, and spam has to look like a legitimate message to escape filters.

    2. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      It'll cost more time and money to send, making the economics of spam slide towards the unprofitable side (maybe not enough though).

      Presuming of course spam is sent legitimately, and not by zombie boxes..

    3. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two similar posts ? karma whoring or something else ??

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=111126&cid=9 42 8562

    4. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two smilar posts ?

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=111126&cid=9 42 8624

    5. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Emails may start to include much more advanced/annoying graphics, sounds and maybe interactive ad-games.

      Great . . . just what i need, my mother sending me a short e-mail telling me how she me with a goddamn flash intro. . .

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    6. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hate responding to myself, but I meant 'telling me how she misses me with a goddamn flash intro'.

    7. Re:Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by FsG · · Score: 1
      Now that so many people have broadband, there's no reason to stick to smaller messages.

      I doubt this will be a problem, as it will quickly give spammers away. Think about it: some people do use HTML email, for example, but no *real person* would write a script or java game for the sole purpose of emailing it to someone, except for spammers and virus writers. The technology may make it possible, but email will remain a communication medium that's almost entirely text based. I have no doubt that mailservers would be promptly configured to delete any emails that include interactive ad-games.

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  20. Say it with me folks. by aixou · · Score: 1

    Google rules (you know, cuz now we yahoo users get more storage and all)

  21. No Upgrade for Rocketmail users by dr_zeus · · Score: 1

    At least I haven't had my Rocketmail account upgraded. My Yahoo accounts show the 100MB limit, but Rocketmail is still stuck at 6MB, which is irritating itself since the mailbox size limit *used* to be 10MB until Yahoo knocked it down for some reason.

  22. Yahoo spam filters really really suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have been reporting messages as spam in Yahoo's spam "filter" for about a year now with no improvement whatsoever.

    Hopefully, spam filtering is better in Google.

  23. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I will have to take your word for it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  24. I am lovin' it by andhravodu · · Score: 1

    This is cool. I just logged into my Ymail account and noticed that they did increase to 100 MB. To make it more visible, you have a new layout for the login page. Now, I could just keep 1 yahoo account instead of 3 which I am having right now.

  25. No additional spam? by jokach · · Score: 1

    "Yahoo says its terms of service do not allow it to use the text of e-mail messages to select which ads to show users."

    Wow, more storage ... and no more spam based on the content of my emails. Not sure how Yahoo is going to accomodate the cost of additional storage, but they might keep my email business.

  26. Re:YEP! Slashdot, bait and grab! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The change seems to be quite inconsistent throughout their servers. I have several Yahoo accounts for different purposes, and when logging onto them today, sometimes it would show 100MB and upon going back to the Inbox page, it would show 4MB, sometimes the new stylesheet would load and other times only partially. Seems to be broken all over the place.

  27. Bugs, Bugs. by moehoward · · Score: 1


    They also sent out messages to paying customers overnight that they are over their limit now.

    My 0% of 25 MB used resulted in me getting an email that I was over my 2 MB limit.

    After paying their ridiculous fee and getting such crappy support and jerky emails, I welcome the switch to GMail.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by Stalus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's a snippet from my e-mail:

      You are currently exceeding your Yahoo! Mail storage quota by a very large amount. You are only allowed -2048.0MB of storage but you are currently using 0.0MB of storage. Your account has been temporarily disabled from receiving new messages.

      The easiest way to continue receiving your important email is to expand your mailbox. Yahoo! Mail offers 10, 25, 50 and 100MB of storage space starting at just $9.99/year.

      Nice to know that I can only have negative storage. Looks like they want me to give them storage. Not exactly sure how I'm supposed to do that... At least it's just an account that comes with my DSL that I don't use.

    2. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious: is your account free or paid for? Since don't seem to be pissed off, I assume your account is free. :P

    3. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by psinormal · · Score: 1

      I got one of these messages this morning as well. Like Stalus, I got the account with my DSL. It is a free account, but basically they give you a premium account for free. I didn't get the same message in my normal (previously smaller) yahoo account, so I just assumed it was a bug converting their premium accounts over.

    4. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by Stalus · · Score: 1

      Well, I pay for it through DSL - it comes as part of the package and I never registered for it. I'm not pissed off because basically all this account gets used for is for notices from SBC/Yahoo. My regular e-mail is tied to my domain, with which I can provide different e-mail addresses to different people and keep my primary mailbox from getting spam.

    5. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by etymxris · · Score: 1
      They're updating everything in a flurry. But they have no intention of gypping their paying members:
      Thanks for subscribing to Yahoo! Mail Plus. It's our goal to offer you an email experience that makes it easy to stay in touch and offers great value. Periodically, we make changes to enhance the service for our users. As of June 15, 2004, you'll enjoy the following benefits at no additional charge:

      * Increase in your storage quota to 2GB
      * No graphical ads
      * A streamlined interface that's even easier to use ...
      Still, I paid for 50MB, and have yet to receive the upgrade. It'll probably just take them a day or two to get things straightened out.
    6. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they're asking is for use of a couple of gigabytes of storage off your hard drive, and you're complaining? With 400G hard drives going into production, storage is cheap beyond belief. What is it, less than a dollar a gig these days?

      Whiny Slashdotters, always want everything for free. Eesh.

    7. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also got that email this morning. Since I had forwarding turned on, my mailbox was completely empty - looks like a bug in the upgrade for those with empty mailboxes.

    8. Re:Bugs, Bugs. by VeneficusAcerbus · · Score: 1

      Actually, my mailbox (thru SBC Yahoo DSL) has 1.6MB, and I got the same email yesterday! Except when I looked at the little percentage-use bar, it still had the old amount. I was a bit pissed off, so I sent myself a test email and received it, so I just assimed they were fucking around with things. And it turns out they were.

  28. Yee haw! by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    I logged on this morning to find my mail bumped to 100MB. I went from 83% to 3%. Yes! However, the system is slow as shit this morning. They also changed the design slightly. Too bad you still have ads all over the place.

    1. Re:Yee haw! by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      My Yahoo email is free of ads, thanks to Proxomitron

  29. But wait, there's more!!! by jkabbe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am really excited about their new DHTML-enabled interface. I just can't read mail without links that change colors when you hover over them!!!

    1. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by troon · · Score: 1

      I haven't actually seen the Yahoo page, but this is more likely to be CSS than DHTML.

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    2. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by jkabbe · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I actually write this stuff for a living, I just don't know what it's called most of the time :)

    3. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a lot better than some crappy webpage that uses 10 java applets to make a menu that changes color when you hover over the selections. don't rag on dhtml.. tough I agree, email should be 100% plain text (except attachments, of course)

    4. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo mail is one of the last big email providers to offer a non-javascript mode. This is what I use most of the time and I love it. It's basically their old style from a couple of years back and is mostly plain old html. Works in every browser including lynx.

      -hadohk

    5. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but it just feels so much sloooower.... Just what I needed out of the acct i use as little as possible to start with..... (mainly to enter contests, register sw, etc.. to avoid spam on my real email acct)

      yep.. slower is better...

    6. Re:But wait, there's more!!! by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      Too bad they just broke it under w3m though. I used to check that mailbox from work through an SSH tunnel. No more :(

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  30. Old News by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    The increase to 100MB was reported in Motley Fool on May 17.

    1. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - but they are implementing today and weren't on May 17th.

  31. Awww by gspr · · Score: 1

    I've had my Yahoo mail account for so long that I have 6 MB instead of the regular 4. Do I get 150 MB then? Pweease?

    1. Re:Awww by martone66 · · Score: 1

      Nope, "only" 100MB like the rest of the unwashed masses.

    2. Re:Awww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had my Yahoo! email account for over 7 years (6mb inbox and all), and it's up to 100mb now. Much welcome upgrade.

  32. Also, the UI has been (slightly) revamped by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

    Nice muted colour scheme, unlike some that I can think of... :D

    -MT.

    --
    -MT.
  33. Not for everyone by amembleton · · Score: 1

    I have been upgraded to 100MB but neither of my girlfriend's accounts (she has two) have been upgraded.

    I always download my email with POP, so they don't have to store many of mine wheras both of her accounts are at >80%. I suspect I've been upgraded cos I don't store many emails so it won't cost them too much and it looks like good PR.

    1. Re:Not for everyone by savagedome · · Score: 1

      Jeez. I mean this is tin-foil to the max.

      I am always sitting on > 80% on my yahoo account as I don't delete every email and don't use POP. Both my accounts have been upgraded.

      They are doing it because gmail upped the ante. They must be definitely wanting to make money from it. But atleast give them a little credit.

    2. Re:Not for everyone by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're not upgrading every person at once? Sheesh, give them a little time.

  34. I dont get this trend by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Why not just remotely access your own ISP-based email account?

    It's pretty easy to set up...

    1. Re:I dont get this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Never changed your ISP before? With a webmail account when you change ISPs you dont have to change your email address too.

    2. Re:I dont get this trend by urmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

      ISP's come and go

    3. Re:I dont get this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because - I don't want to be tied to my ISP when I get fed up with their crappy service and support and move to another one. Or the other one has a better deal. ISP email addresses are not portable, Yahoo and Gmail are.

    4. Re:I dont get this trend by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have...

      I have also moved from one place of residence to another, and I had to change my snailmail address too (and my phone number, since it was in another area code).

      Granted, I could also use a PO box, but I figured my home snail-mail address works just as well.

      I made my address change known to the people who need to contact me.

    5. Re:I dont get this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live next door to the post office a PO box is a big difference in convenience compared to your home mailing address. On the other hand, the difference in convenience between a webmail account and an ISP email account is small, until the day you decide to move to a new ISP. Having one less thing to worry about changing (and notifying people of) sounds like a good thing to me.

      (P.S. With Vonage you can keep you current phone number no matter what part of the country you move to)

    6. Re:I dont get this trend by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      I registered a domain for like US$9/year, then got really cheap hosting from a friend, along with a POP/IMAP mailbox where I can have the mail sent for my domain. Yahoo will even do it, for like US$10-15 per year. If having a "static" email address is that important, then it makes sense to simply pay for one.

  35. G-G-G-G-Mai-UL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Service only costs 50 cents.

    Biatch.

  36. And when it's full... by darien · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's cool. It'll be nice not to have to clear out my Yahoo! inbox every week. This will probably stop me migrating. After all everyone already knows my @yahoo.com email address.

    However, at some point my 100Mb box will be full, and I'll want to get it down to, say 50Mb. At which point I very much hope there'll be some decent new tools for bulk deletion. The idea of trying to free up 50Mb by clicking through page after page of email going "select... delete..." does not appeal.

    1. Re:And when it's full... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Well, nuts. When I hit "add comment" no one had said that yet!)

    2. Re:And when it's full... by glaHHg · · Score: 4, Informative

      So go download a thing called yahoopops (or whatever it's called, google is down right now or I'd link it). It lets you check your yahoo email with a standard email client. So just download it then delete everything you don't think you'll need to access from anywhere.
      Okay google's back here's the url: http://yahoopops.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:And when it's full... by jhkoh · · Score: 1
      After all everyone already knows my @yahoo.com email address.

      I hope that's not the only reason you don't migrate to another e-mail service. With fetchyahoo, I forwarded all my Yahoo mail to my new address, so that I was able to catch all the people and mailing lists that hadn't started using my new address. I ran fetchyahoo as a cron job on a Linux server; if you are tied to Windows, you could probably run in under Cygwin.

    4. Re:And when it's full... by sootman · · Score: 1

      It still requires a lot of checkbox clicking, but I can save you lots of page clicking--just hit the "size" link (twice?) to get your biggest messages at the top. Faster to delete one 200k message than a hundred 2k messages.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:And when it's full... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So go download a thing called yahoopops (or whatever it's called, google is down right now or I'd link it).

      Ah, I love the smell of irony in the morning...

    6. Re:And when it's full... by jjsoh · · Score: 1
      • "The idea of trying to free up 50Mb by clicking through page after page of email going "select... delete..." does not appeal."
      What about selecting and deleting 500MB worth of space? I don't have a gmail account, so I don't know if there's an easier way to do it other than the way you just described it. However, if I had a choice to clean up 50MB or 500MB, I think I'd choose the former even if I had to do it every other month or so.

      I'm not saying 100MB ought to be enough for anyone, but it's good enough for me. Well, for the time being, at least. But I definitely agree about being able to keep the same address. I don't want to imagine changing my account information on all the sites I've ever registered, as well as informing all my contacts. That would be a serious nuisance.

      I'll probably end up opening a gmail account anyway. Heh. But, it's nice to know that my Yahoo! account is more usable now.
    7. Re:And when it's full... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I forwarded all my old email (minus most attachments) up to GMail and "You are currently using 139 MB (14%) of your 1000 MB". 100MB is nothing.

  37. annoying I can only delete 25 messages at a time.. by mwilliamson · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Unless I'm missing something in yahoo's interface, yahoo only lets you delete 25 messages at a time. With an inbox packed with spam and multiple groups subscriptions disabled because mail is bouncing, this is quite annoying. Now with 100 megs I'll have to spend a couple days deleting messages once every year or two. -Michael

  38. Here's the BugMeNot link for the NY Times... by tcopeland · · Score: 2, Informative

    ....right here.

  39. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by dennison_uy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, I think that's more a result of Yahoo migrating to the new system. I've seen the new interface from my friend's account like 6 hours ago and it looks pretty slick. He had thought Yahoo! was bugged but we kept refreshing and we were able to watch them migrate to the new interface in real time.

    I logged into my account and it was still using the old interface and had the old 4-megabyte limit. It wasn't until I logged in like 10 minutes ago that I logged in to see the new interface, although a bit broken ... they are still probably porting over some of the accounts ... I wonder why they couldn't make "global" changes that would affect all users at once, as it probably should be?

    --
    Take off every 'sig'!
    All your 'sig' are belong to us!
  40. umm by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gmail: 1,024 megabytes
    Yahoo: 100 megabytes

    I think it's pretty clear that Yahoo is getting desperate and stupid; they most lileky don't have the infrastructure in place to offer 1GB email accounts or they already would have. 100MB is just a temporary kludge to keep existing users from flocking to GMail as long as possible (p.s: it won't work!)

    1. Re:umm by martone66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hotmail: 2 megabytes

      Hotmail is still their main competitor, at least until Gmail comes out of beta and everyone and their mother can sign up for an account.

    2. Re:umm by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      Well, one thing that's preventing me from dropping whatever my current inbox may be to in favor of gmail is the fact that I still seem to be unable to actually GET a gmail account...

    3. Re:umm by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      I believe they do have the infra and I think the problem is it's Network Appliance-based and hence outrageously expensive!

      1GB of NetApp NFS vs. 1GB of Linux NFS

      1GB of Linux NFS is essentially priced same as HDD (per-GB cost - take a 200GB NFS server and cost of the box becomes miniscule as it breaks down to 1/200th per GB).

    4. Re:umm by mjh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      (p.s: it won't work!)

      Actually it might. Right now, only beta testers can migrate to gmail. But most people can't. So they can't weigh whether the gmail service is better/worse than yahoo. As a consequence, people may discover that 100MB of mail space is all they need. If they're used to 6MB of mail space, 100MB is a huge increase. The decision isn't just between an additional 94MB and 994MB. It's between:

      • 1000GB
      • 100MB + keep current email address
      Don't discount the cost of switching your email address. Keeping your email address is probably worth a whole lot more to most people than an additional 900MB of disk space... especially if they've been getting by with 6MB of disk space.

      IMHO, this is a really good move on Yahoo's part. It will be interesting to see how well it works.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    5. Re:umm by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. Mods, please up the parent accordingly...

    6. Re:umm by sam1am · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that you can KEEP BOTH.
      You can take all the time in the world to migrate from the (free) Yahoo account to the (free) gmail account. No cost for maintaining the old account to get any mail people may send you there for as long as you need. (Except for a few minutes each week to check it...)

    7. Re:umm by g-doo · · Score: 1

      Actually, 100 MB is plenty for me. I think that the Yahoo! Mail interface is pretty clean already, and it offers convenience because of integration with other Yahoo! features I use, like My Yahoo!, Yahoo! Messenger, and GeoCities. There seems to be a lot of biased favoring towards Google at Slashdot just because it's Google.

    8. Re:umm by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's caled diminishing returns. going up from 1 meg to 10 megs would be a huge benefit, up to 100 megs being a large improvement, but up to a gig only a small improvement for most people and 10 gigs would be almost no improvement.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:umm by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1
      1000 GB? Now THATS a limit I can live with!

      Typo aside, I think its already been proven that if you keep all of your mail, 1G can fill up with spam pretty darn quick - its still not enough.

    10. Re:umm by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      Gmail: 1,024 megabytes
      Yahoo: 100 megabytes
      Oh, you forgot one:
      Gmail: reading your emails and advertising to you based on it. I'm happy to have a Yahoo account for that reason. Really, 100MB is big enough--that's more online storage than my ISP gives me. I don't think Gmail allows message sizes of 10MB like Yahoo does now. Does Gmail do POP access? With Yahoo POPs, the free account can do that too.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    11. Re:umm by mjh · · Score: 1

      Oh, but for the ability to edit a post after the fact!!! Yeah, I saw that after I posted it. Oops!

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    12. Re:umm by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's more to it than that:

      Gmail: 1GB including spam, good searching tools (including keywords and conversation view), POP access, not yet available

      Yahoo: 100MB not including spam, no search or conversation view, folders but not keywords, no POP access yet, keep your address.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:umm by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1
      they most lileky don't have the infrastructure in place to offer 1GB email accounts

      Well, I have 2GB with my Yahoo account so I guess they do.

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    14. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...everyone and their mother can sign up for an account...

      You can lead your mother to Gmail but you can't make her think.

      I wasted a perfectly good invitation to Gmail by sending it to my mother. She declined. She doesn't have -- or want -- an email address. sigh...

    15. Re:umm by Genom · · Score: 1

      Does Gmail do POP access? With Yahoo POPs, the free account can do that too.

      Actually, what I'd *love* to see is IMAP instead of, or in addition to POP.

      Still no Gmail account for me, though. I guess I don't know enough of the "right" folks.

  41. who'd have thought... by professorhojo · · Score: 3, Funny

    we could all get so gooey over webmail again? or is it just me... ? ;-)

    1. Re:who'd have thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're the only one that's "gooey" here, squirt.

    2. Re:who'd have thought... by Froobly · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's quite interesting. When webmail first became big, it was kind of a neat trick, but kind of useless. Sure, you could check it from anywhere, but getting internet access from "anywhere" was mainly a luxury afforded students.

      And then the virii came. Nowadays, when you use webmail, you have a built-in buffer between your computer and your spam, you have a spam filter trained by the data of hundreds of thousands of users, you've got universal accessability (which is nice now that you can actually use the internet somewhere other than your own home), and now you've got high-quality software that's constantly being updated, with more storage space than you probably have free on your hard drive now.

      Webmail has all of a sudden actually become a good idea, rather than some gimmick that dot-coms used to try to get extra hits. Of course, this all makes me wonder, where does Hotmail come into all of this? Does anybody use Hotmail anymore?

  42. Well... by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 0

    I got my Gmail account today, it is quite nice. Have yet to explore it really, how can they offer 1GB ? So much space ! How is Yahoo, total spammage or spam free ?

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
  43. Cool. More spam by AppyPappy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Great. I can hold more spam. My Yahoo account is almost useless from the weight of spam in it. It's like a magnet for every weird spam too. I get spam for penis shrinking, failing stocks to buy, expensive generic drugs and elderly Amish women pics.

    That's what I get for subscribing to that Campus Crusade for Habakkuk list

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    1. Re:Cool. More spam by microTodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, Yahoo clearly states that mail in the "Bulk" (SPAM) folder does not couny against your upper limit.

      I actually think that Yahoo's spam filtering is very good. I only get a few false positives a month. And there is also a mailbox-specific domain blocker that you have control over.

      Pretty good service for free, methinks.

      P.S. Thanks for Slahdotting mail.yahoo.com guys! Now I can't check my mail!

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    2. Re:Cool. More spam by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      I just told Yahoo! to trash all my Bulk Mail instantly. Problem solved. :)

      (And yes, I have made sure all my essential e-mail is either on the non-spam list or routed to another e-mail before taking that step...)

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
    3. Re:Cool. More spam by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      These are not "bulk" items. They come to my inbox. My bulk box was crushingly huge.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    4. Re:Cool. More spam by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      ...and elderly Amish women pics.

      Damn! You get all the good pR0n spam...

      Then again, you may need the penis enlargement spams after seeing those pictures... ;-)

    5. Re:Cool. More spam by neosake · · Score: 1

      P.S. Thanks for Slahdotting mail.yahoo.com guys! Now I can't check my mail!

      While it may be the /. effect, I think it's more because of the Akamai server outage

      --
      "When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
    6. Re:Cool. More spam by microTodd · · Score: 1

      YMMV...I've had my e-mail account at Yahoo since 1998 and the SPAM filter catches 99% of my SPAM.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  44. quick! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Somebody go get an account with them and test out their spam filters!

    1. Re:quick! by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. Though I report them, I still get about a dozen "new" spams a week in my Yahoo! account, including the e-mail equivalent of a ping (no body, no subject, random from-name) to see if my e-mail address is spam-worthy.

      I wish I could send a huge electric shock back through the wires to the spammers' keyboards.

  45. Interactive Ad-Games: The Spam of the Future! by Badam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one is happier than I that Yahoo is increasing my quota. I'm just about out of space, and don't want to irritate my friends by bouncing back their messages. My mom can get pretty pissed too.

    How long before spam starts including multimedia files that eat up the extra allocation? Now that so many people have broadband, there's no reason to stick to smaller messages. Emails may start to include much more advanced/annoying graphics, sounds and maybe interactive ad-games.

    --

    Check out my blog: My Galaxy is Milky Way Adjacent
  46. Comparison by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    100 megs to 1 gig
    Let me ponder on that thought while I delete my 200 + spam mails a day, that I need to sort through manually to inspect that it does not contain any of my friends.
    The 200 + spam mails a day is a recent event. About two-three months ago I used to average about 20-40 a day - all of a sudden there was a huge surge.
    I won't mind giving Gmail a try and hope their spam filters are better. While I do not mind a skyscraper ad, on the side of my email, I do mind pop-ups/under. I hope that the ads they propose won't contain porn/hate websites....it would be annoying if I am at work trying to read my email but cannot due to the half naked woman to the right of my e-mail.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Comparison by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "Let me ponder on that thought while I delete my 200 + spam mails a day, that I need to sort through manually to inspect that it does not contain any of my friends."

      It's my belief that Yahoo, Netscape, and likely others have purposely given out your email address in exchange for money. As far as I am concerned, we should all save our spam in a special non-trash folder for the sole purpose of running their servers into the ground.

      The worse example I know if is Netscape. I had an email address with them for years - with no spam. The day I 'confirmed' my email address with them (so I could get at the email preferences page) I was deluged with spam which never stopped. That email address became useless (Netscape doesn't have any spam filtering, as best I can tell).

      The warm fuzzy I have with Google is that they won't give my email address to their spamming 'partners'.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    2. Re:Comparison by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Let me ponder on that thought while I delete my 200 + spam mails a day, that I need to sort through manually to inspect that it does not contain any of my friends.

      And, as probably mentioned numerous times elsewhere... bulk mail on Yahoo's mail service does not count towards your mail quotas.

      My issues with any web-mail service is rarely the lack of folder space... it's the reliability factor. Also known as: What's to stop them from suddenly deleting the entire contents of my mailbox, and then saying "tough luck".

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:Comparison by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      How about the e-mails that take two days to show up, or "bounce" from known sources (those in contact list) for no reason? I have had times where I sent myself an e-mail (as a memo note) and never received it! And that is going from the same e-mail account - it's like a crap shoot

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  47. Re:annoying I can only delete 25 messages at a tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mail Options->General Preferences->Messages per page

  48. Some people are, some people aren't by greenmars · · Score: 1

    I still have my regular old 6 megs of space, but my wife just IM'd me to tell me about her 100 megs. What's up, Yahoo?

  49. 100 MB ... ONLY??? by dennison_uy · · Score: 0

    WTF??? At a time when Google made it public that they are going to offer 1 GB email accounts, Yahoo upgrades their service to a mere 100 MB?

    Is it THAT difficult to compete with Google???

    --
    Take off every 'sig'!
    All your 'sig' are belong to us!
    1. Re:100 MB ... ONLY??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, maybe someone actually has experience in the market and know what makes economic sense.... So far Google has NO data that proves it can make a sustainable business out of Gmail. And perhaps someone has put some of staff on market research and realised that most users won't need much more and won't care about the gap between 100MB and 1GB.

    2. Re:100 MB ... ONLY??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that Yahoo! already has a huge existing userbase. Maybe upgrading to more than 100mb/user mailboxes wasn't feasible for them right away. Even as it is, 100mb is a very welcome upgrade.

    3. Re:100 MB ... ONLY??? by warriorpostman · · Score: 1
      I doubt the average email user actually needs 1GB of space. Certainly, users will find a way to not be able to live without 1GB of space, but this morning when I saw a notice from Yahoo saying that they had increased my account capacity to 100MB, I kind of lost the desire for a gmail account. I suppose I just needed a little bit more extra space and not a LOT more extra space.

      And yes, I delete all the superflous, massive video attachments after a short period time, because Yahoo has a huge red indicator saying "YOu are using 100+ % of your email space!!!"

      100MB is fine by me. Although, I wouldn't mind trying out a gmail account, just to see what all the fuss is all about.

    4. Re:100 MB ... ONLY??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, they just want you to fork over 20/year for double a gmail account without any ads. Yahoo's model has always been about trying to convince you to upgrade your mailbox. Except now they'll kill the ads, and that makes me berry berry happy.

    5. Re:100 MB ... ONLY??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah your right. No one will ever need more then 640k.

  50. Confirmation... by DjMd · · Score: 1

    My Yahoo mail account is now at 100MB (spam away)
    The Yahoo mail homepage also reflects this fact here

    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
  51. Now where's my mail? by stuntshell · · Score: 1

    New service, excellent. Now let me in!!!!!!!!!!I can't log in anymore, must be all the slashdotters getting free 100megs email acounts....

    --
    0011 1111 0111 1010
  52. Brilliant strategy! by Pollux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This article at New York Times explains that Yahoo has decided to boost their E-mail space (Soul sucking registration required) from their current 4 megabytes to 100 in response to Gmail. They are also planning to offer 2 gig mailboxes for $19.99(USD)

    Hmm. Now, let's figure out which business deal is better, shall we?

    Do I either,
    A) Pay $20 for a 2 gig Yahoo box, or
    B) Open up 2 GMail accounts for free and still have 2 gigs of storage.

    Now, the true genius will suddenly realize that if you open 3 accounts, that means you have 3 gigs of space, and that's more than 2 gigs that Yahoo offers. How many of you figured that one out?

    1. Re:Brilliant strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do I either,
      A) Pay $20 for a 2 gig Yahoo box, or
      B) Open up 2 GMail accounts for free and still have 2 gigs of storage."

      I will stick with (A), since the paid Yahoo service offers POP mail access.

      Plus not to mention I can't get (B), even if I wanted to pay for it.

    2. Re:Brilliant strategy! by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      C) Keep the 100MB Yahoo box + don't change of email address. My Yahoo email address is known by everyone in my family, some companys, some institutions, my school, old schoolmates plus a buch of mailling lists (and some spammers :/). It is near to impossible for me to contact them all to send them my new email address in a timely fashion whithout the risk that some of them loose my new address and fall back on the old one...

    3. Re:Brilliant strategy! by dspyder · · Score: 1

      Are you using it for storage, or as an email service? Personally I use my Yahoo and GMail accounts to send and receive mail. That means I need POP and SMTP... not available in Google. What about when I run out of space (and I do with all my mailing list digests I want to keep)? I need some kind of bulk archiving tool to zip and save my email boxes to lower-cost-media backup... not available in Google, or the free Yahoo!

      I finally broke down a couple months ago and got in on a promo Yahoo! was doing for one of their Plus services right after I got my gmail account. The benefits of the Yahoo! Plus service far outweigh the theoretical advantage of being able to intelligently search through your email. Although I do think that's a feature I would eventually like to have, and I'm betting Yahoo! will be forced to do it sooner rather than later.

      --D

    4. Re:Brilliant strategy! by ankura · · Score: 1

      > B) Open up 2 GMail accounts for free and still have 2 gigs of storage.

      Actually, Gmail TOS allows you to have just one account.

    5. Re:Brilliant strategy! by Occam's+Hammer · · Score: 1

      I'll stick to the $20 version too

      1) Pop3 receive and (now) send via a drop down menu in the compose view.
      2) There are NO ads in the yahoo mail area.
      3) great new disposable email service for web transaction other than friends and family

      I'm in.

      --
      (sig on loan to Smithsonian)
  53. That's a BAD idea by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    ...since their spam filtering doesnt perform that well and, in consequence, the hapless user will be turned into a garbage collector, having to click on individual mails from a list that spans over several 20-lines screens.

    And I'm talking about Yahoo-sponsored spam!!

    And they might charge their users for a improved spam filter.

    Damn suits!

    1. Re:That's a BAD idea by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      Er, you did remember to turn the spam filter on, didn't you? Works wonders for my e-mails, catches about 80-90% of the spam.

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
  54. Yahoo /.d??? by leadsling · · Score: 1

    I saw this story, went to my yahoo page to check my account and can't log in!?!?! Now that's something!

  55. I suspect that the difference between google and.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    all the rest (including hotmail, aol, yahoo) will be that the others will be selling your info that you register and from your e-mail while google will not. This will be no different than the way that Yahoo/MSN/AOL currently sell your login to spammers (and MSN/AOL will actually offer bandwidth/client ip's to these same spammers).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  56. Just got my gmail... never going back by zhevek · · Score: 1

    I have had a Yahoo address since the week Yahoo started offering email services back in the 90's. I have used it pretty consistently since then.

    However, I just got my gmail account a couple of days ago. The text only advertisements make the page so much bigger (important on a laptop with a 12" screen), so I can actually see my emails. The way emails are grouped into threads is wonderful. I love the keyboard commands, as I have never been a big fan of using mice much. Immediate searching of all your email. And so on... Every single thing about gmail is better than yahoo mail. Even my login, as I have my first name and last initial as my login (thanks to getting in during beta).

    I will never go back to yahoo.... it's not just the storage space.

  57. I don't get it by Eudial · · Score: 0

    Why use external mail providers?

    Step 1. Install sendmail & some spam filter
    Step 2. Get a free domain (dyndns.org)
    Step 3. [insert-your-drive-capacity-here] mail storage (~ 180 Gb for me).
    Step 4.???
    Step 5. Profit!

    Ok, sure, some people are on dialup and so, but the rest of us. why?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:I don't get it by jjohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because installing sendmail and some spam filter is non-trivial, and often a pain in the ass, and you have to worry about system security, patching, maintenance...

      I'm seriously considering shutting down my own mail host because I've moved it three times in the last year, and every time I set it up again, I wonder why I'm putting all this effort into it.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:I don't get it by TheBigBezona · · Score: 1

      There is a useful middle ground. I run a "mail server" - mostly just a mail storage/IMAP/Webmail host. I use my ISP's SMTP address for all outgoing mail, so no need to worry about configuration there. My e-mail addresses actually point to Yahoo! mail accounts, which I use fetchmail on my server to grab via POP. This saves a lot of hassle in configuration of the MTA - and less worry about patching and such, since it's not directly recieving or sending anything, and none of the mail ports are opened to the outside. On the upside, I get unlimited storage (well, as much as I care to buy drives for), server side spam filtering, as well as just general organizational filtering, and IMAP, and the ability to back my mail up to another machine with a simple cron job. Once it was set up it takes almost zero maintenance, and is all running happily on an old Pentium II box you can purchase on Ebay for well under $200.

    3. Re:I don't get it by dekashizl · · Score: 1
      Why use external mail providers?
      Step 1. Install sendmail & some spam filter
      ...
      I suppose you have your own little organic garden in your yard from which you pluck all of your food? That would avoid problems with GMO food and pesticides on general produce.

      Might as well keep a cow and chickens in the yard to have fresh milk (without antibiotics) and eggs.

      While you're at it, why buy bottled water? Why even use tap water? Just set up a reservoir in your yard and capture rain water, then distill and purify it to drink.

      Generate your own electricity. Build your computers out of wood. Process raw ore to get all the metals you use for parts. Blow your own glass. Sew your own clothes! Defend yourself in court! Perform surgery on your immediate family and deliver your own children! Make your own musical instruments! Do it all yourself!

      Look, the point is this: It is a fair question to ask why somebody uses some particular service. But the way in which you are asking makes it seem like you just don't get why anybody would possibly not want to do it themselves. How many of the above things I mentioned do you actually do? Just as you would rather plug your computers into the electric grid than generate your own electricity, most people would rather spend their time doing things other than patching and maintaining mail servers (e.g. organic gardening, spending time with family, whatever), so they use existing mail providers.
    4. Re:I don't get it by mjh · · Score: 1
      Because installing sendmail and some spam filter is non-trivial, and often a pain in the ass, and you have to worry about system security, patching, maintenance...

      Not to be oppositional, but I think you've got this backwards. When you run your own server you don't have to worry about all of that stuff unless you want to. In which case, I would say that you get to worry about it. With someone else's server, you have to worry about it because you don't have any control as to whether or not they do anything.

      To wit: yahoo's spam filtering basically sucks. If you choose their system you have to worry about whether or not you're going to get spam. If you run your own system, you're free to worry about it or not. You can spend a lot of time and effort setting up some antispam system that works exactly the way you like it, or you can not, and get the same amount of spam as you would @ yahoo.

      I'm glossing over a lot of stuff here, but my point is that running your own server generally affords you a lot more choices. Some of which imply additional effort on your part. But it's effort that you choose to take on. You don't have to take on all of that extra effort if you don't want to. OTOH, if you go with a provider, no amount of effort on your part can fix any problems that you experience.

      $.02

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    5. Re:I don't get it by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I suppose you have your own little organic garden in your yard from which you pluck all of your food? That would avoid problems with GMO food and pesticides on general produce.

      Might as well keep a cow and chickens in the yard to have fresh milk (without antibiotics) and eggs.

      While you're at it, why buy bottled water? Why even use tap water? Just set up a reservoir in your yard and capture rain water, then distill and purify it to drink.

      Generate your own electricity. Build your computers out of wood. Process raw ore to get all the metals you use for parts. Blow your own glass. Sew your own clothes! Defend yourself in court! Perform surgery on your immediate family and deliver your own children! Make your own musical instruments! Do it all yourself!

      "A human being should be able to change a Diaper, Plan an invasion, Butcher a hog, Conn a ship, Design a building, Write a sonnet, Balance accounts, Build a wall, Set a bone, Comfort the dying, Take orders, Give orders, Cooperate, Act alone, Solve equasions, Analyze a new problem, Pitch Manuer, Program a computer, Cook a tasty meal, Fight efficiently, and Die gallantly.

      Specialization is for ants."

      Robert A. Heinlein


      Kids today.
  58. The first encounter with the new interface by rolling_bits · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was graced today when, still almost asleep, I signed in in my Yahoo-mail, and was greeted by the upgrade message.

    Funnily (is that a word? :), I thought I had clicked in a wrong link, so I clicked the back button and re-did the sign in, and to my surprise, there it was again!

    Still trying to like the new interface, though.

    Competition is good, isn't it? :-)

    If only there were two blondes trying to please me...

  59. What does one do with that space ? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Really, I'm quite curious...

    I can see why, say, maximum message size could be an issue, and that would be a direct relation to max storage space. So if you only had 5MB, then somebody can't e-mail you an 8MB attachment (which is likely only 4MB, but thanks to the wonders of 7bit e-mails...)

    However, one would imagine (at least, I do), that a user would download any such-sized e-mail and promptly rid the online storage space of it.

    So what are the uses of having hundreds of megabytes or even a/2 gigabyte of storage space ?
    Other than the obvious : illicit distribution of data.
    (Yes, I'm sure some people may actually store hundreds of megabytes in their e-mail so that when they go on vacation they can still access it - rather than burn it to a CD or so.)

    Not trying to be flamebait - just wondering what people could actually use this for without reaching.

    1. Re:What does one do with that space ? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      So what are the uses of having hundreds of megabytes or even a/2 gigabyte of storage space ?
      bragging. Due to maximum message sizes, you still can't send/receive 500MB messages, so people will have to accumulate thousands of emails to fill this up, and I'll bet not many will. It's just a pissing contest that 1GB is bigger than 100MB.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  60. Looks like it only applies to .com's by Spad · · Score: 3, Informative

    My .co.uk address is still stuck on 6Mb - although I have been getting free POP access ever since they started charging .com accounts for it, so it's not all bad news.

    1. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the presence of the date in the mail you received from Yahoo...

      As of June 16, 2004, you'll enjoy the following benefits:

      * Increased storage capacity - from your current level to 100MB
      * Increase in individual message send/receive size from 3MB to 10MB
      * An improved layout that's even easier to use


      Hmm, i should try if i got free POP access... That would make me stay with Yahoo for personal mails... News letters can go to Gmail then.

    2. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by Eslyjah · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      I have 100MB on my .co.uk address and 4MB on my .com address.

      I think it's just taking them a while.

    3. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my .co.uk is at 100MB now...

    4. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      My yahoo.co.uk address got upgraded. Needless to say I'm not going to reveal the address here, I get enough spam as it is...

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
    5. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by _Qiang_ · · Score: 1, Informative

      you can still download your email using YahooPops from anywhere

    6. Re:Looks like it only applies to .com's by EMBrauza · · Score: 1

      I have 3 .com's, 1 .ca, and 1 .co.uk, all of which upgraded, though it took far too much time to figure it out, what with Yahoo!'s extreme slowness. Also, as anyone else had a problem when they click "Check Mail", with new messages showing up with annoying horizontal lines across the screen? Grr...

  61. Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by Like2Byte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I began using Yahoo! Mail years ago and I've had 6MB per email address (I've got two) ever since. When I signed my mother and father up to have Yahoo! Mail accounts two years later they were given 4M accounts.

    The first thought I had though since being notified of the increase was, "How the heck am I going to keep track of all the junk I'll eventually have to delete?" My answer was, "To never allow it to clog in the first place by removing immediately any e-mails that I may want to save." The obvious answer.

    IIRC, Yahoo only allows you to set up 10 rules for handling the email you receive. This is troublesome because now that we've been given so much free space, I know people will want to seperate their space by using folders - ideally, automatically - for just about everything and everyone they know. But, if 10 rules are the limit, I see in the future that limitations on space won't be the driving factor in attracting customers. Once again, it will all boil down to service and services available (options, rules, etc.) to the end user.

    1. Re:Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      Well limiting the free service with 10 rules is a very sneaky way to get people to pay for the plus service. (which also allows you to zip up your email and download it)

      By getting people to spend time setting up folders, having 60mb's of old email lying around. paying the extra $20 per year for unlimited filters, 2gb, is way more conveinent then switching to another mail account.

      Plus I have a gmail account, to me, it's like upgrading your harddrive. Seems really exciting and cool till you do it, then you realize you've just added extra space, and now you have to migrate everything over.

    2. Re:Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      I looked it all up and Yahoo!'s maximum mail filter count is 15 for the free service - not 10 as I had originally indicated.

      When the user signs up for the 'Yahoo! Mail Plus' service, they get bumped to 50 filters. Which is nice; but, it's still not very effective for a long term solution.

      Here is the info.

    3. Re:Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by pobbard · · Score: 1

      As of today's upgrade, Yahoo allows 50 filters instead of 10. Still maybe not enough, but a big improvement.

      --Phil

      --
      "It's amazing how our industry is strewn with beautiful, dead technology and bitter engineers." --M. Huyck
    4. Re:Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      See my previous post.

    5. Re:Not all Yahoo! email boxes 4Meg by sootman · · Score: 1

      Mine has 15 filters, not 10. And other posts say that number has increased along with the size. I've been using yahoo! as my primary email interface for over a year--I got a second job last May and never check email at home any more. I forwarded my me@mydomain.com address to yahoo and it has been pretty good. It took a while for it to quit thinking my dads email was spam but otherwise it's been pretty good. the added size is great for me--I was always bumping up against the 6 mb limit and routinely went over if I didn't check religiously. Suddenly, life is much better. Funny--I was *almost* ready to pay for the upgraded account to get better spam filtering, I was just waiting until I decided whether or not to use them for my web hosting as well. I'll still probably use them for that.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  62. Crap, I had a 6 MB mailbox by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    As an early Yahoo! user, I had a 6 MB box, which proved how '1337 I was. Now I'm just a 100MB schlub like everyone else.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Crap, I had a 6 MB mailbox by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      A 6 meg mailbox isn't all that rare, what is rare is a "first name" userid like John (not mine!). Besides how could you " proved how '1337'" you are with some thing that can only be shown on your screen? Personally, I'm glad to have my yahoo account upgraded from 6 to 100 MB. I have other ways to prove my grandness, like a lower Slashdot UserId than you :-)

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    2. Re:Crap, I had a 6 MB mailbox by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, not this debate again....... :)

  63. Best part is by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    they haven't even produced a service yet. They have something in BETA that is raising the standard. This is a good indication of what will happen if/when it does come out.

  64. Re:Effective Now by kroekle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Except for the fact that when I email myself it puts my messages into the spam folder. I guess Yahoo believes that any mail coming from a Yahoo account IS spam. :)

  65. What About ISP's Email? by $criptah · · Score: 1

    I do not get it... Has everybody stopped using the e-mail accounts that come with the Internet service?

    I have been using my ISPs e-mail without problems for several years. They are good at dealing with spam, they provide webmail and they support SSL. Am I being pre-historic here?

    1. Re:What About ISP's Email? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I was once a big user of ISP mail, then I had to move, which forced me to change ISPs.

      That's a traumatic experience.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:What About ISP's Email? by mi · · Score: 1
      Should've used your own domain-name -- for, like, $12 per year you can have all mail to @example.com forwarded to your current ISP's account. Switch an ISP -- switch the forwarding. ISP's servers are closer to you, they usually offer IMAP, not just POP (nor web-mail).

      I am puzzled with everyone's obsession with "webmail" -- especially on SlashDot, where people are supposed to be computer-literate...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:What About ISP's Email? by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      No, you just got lucky with an ISP that gives a monkeys about helping their customers handle their e-mail.

      I forward all my ISP e-mail to my Yahoo! account, where the spam gets filtered out for me.

      -MT.

      --
      -MT.
    4. Re:What About ISP's Email? by debest · · Score: 1

      Because (at least for me), email users get *really* irritated at ISPs going bankrupt, merging with other ISPs, or whatever else happens that causes your email address to suddenly be useless. I got my first email address in 1993, and until I got my own domain in 2001, I had to change my address FOUR TIMES due to these shenanegans. The collapse of @HOME on my cable provider was the last straw.

      Yes, having separate ISP and domain hosts costs more, but the comfort and control (not to mention what you're allowed to do) make it easily worth it. I want my ISP to be absolutely nothing but a pipe to the internet. I want nothing to do with any other services, as they are designed only to keep you captive to them. As a result, I have no problem with contemplating (as I currently am) switching from cable to DSL.

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    5. Re:What About ISP's Email? by $criptah · · Score: 1

      That is what I think. I would not touch Hotmail and Yahoo with a ten foot pole simply because they use their damn free services to market things. I do not take any address that ends with @hotmail or @yahoo as a serious address.

    6. Re:What About ISP's Email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I use my school/ISP for email, but they have been getting worse and worse.

      I go to USC, and they give us a pretty good deal with our email accounts, or at least they did. Right now I have a max mailbox size of 73MB. In my three years of attending school I only have used about 50MB for 1000 emails stored, both sent and received. Obviously I don't keep every email around, especially if it has an attachment, but this system has worked quite well.

      Beginning September 1, the school will automatically delete any message older than 180 days, but still have a max mailbox size of 73MB! You can read about this upcoming change here. I don't use these old emails every day, maybe 4 times a month, but it is nice to be able to access them from any computer that I use without storing them on my personal computer to avoid deletion. Last summer the school installed the web-based Sun iPlanet, yet now you have to backup emails offline and won't be able to access them them from anywhere, as seems the purpose of iPlanet.

      I have tried to stop this from taking place by emailing our computer infrastructure group, they claim this is the doing of our VP. If the school gives us such a large mailbox, shouldn't it be up to the user to keep it under the limit without automatic deletion? Even if every student paid a dollar at the start of their school career, it would pay for this small amount of hard drive space, as well as multiple RAID and non-RAID backups. With these large free email accounts available (yahoo, google...) why is my school doing this? Do you have advice on how to approach the school to stop this policy, and what is your school's policy on email limits (amount, size, automatic deletion)?

      Thanks

    7. Re:What About ISP's Email? by $criptah · · Score: 1

      Hey there. I graduated form the University of Vermont last year. My school was somewhat good about it but also, I could choose from different options.

      First, I could use my school's account. If I did not like that, I could use my college's account (College of Engineering within UVM), finally if I did not like that, I could switch to my work account at school.

      You have several options that may require some decision making. If you decide to battle your school and get more / better email space / service, they will either increase the tuition rate or tell you to fuck off; also, you're likely to make some enemies among the administration and IT people. The second option is to play a long with them.

      They are going to delete a message that is older than 180 days. So what? They are not going to come to your dorm room and delete it from your workstation/laptop! Make sure that you retreive all the e-mail from the server and save it on your computer. I have tons of folders that store some important e-mail sorted by different categories. As a sys. admin, I am used to backing things up and therefore I do not lose any info. If you want to do it my way, here is what to do.

      Get an old PC. Put Linux/*BSD on it and get some serious space. You can get 250GB without spending a lot of money nowadays. Use it as your backup server for important e-mail, documents, and the rest of the stuff that you do not want to lose. I learned how to use rsync and that is how I syncronize all my stuff on a nightly basis. Why do that? Well, for one thing, I do not want to run a mail server because I do not want to bother with spam filtering; some schools and ISPs seem to be much better at it. Secondly, read your IT agreement that you had to sign when you agreed to the school's services. Chances are that there is some bullshit in it. I prefer to keep my confidential info closer ot me; therefore, I delete messages from the server as soon as I retreive them.

      The bottom line is that you have to realize: your college is not in business of IT or providing large e-mail accounts. They are there to educate you. Of course there are exceptions to the issue. I haven't discovered why my school decided to install flat screen TVs in dining halls ....

  66. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by mpieters · · Score: 2, Informative

    Akamai's DNS servers appear to be MIA. Did someone find the Akamai Achilles heel?

    This means Microsoft.com, Applce.com, Google.com and many other sites don't resolve right now. Oops.

    --
    "The truth shall make ye fret" -- The Truth, Terry Pratchett
  67. Do you really need 1 gig? by etymxris · · Score: 1

    I think this is a case of us Americans going "ooooo, more is better" and taking the higher number without really thinking about it. Which would you choose: 2047 minutes free of AOL, or 1000 minutes from a plain jane competitor? I'd choose the latter.

    Also, from what I hear, there are restrictions on that 1 gig offer from gmail. You can't send someone a 400mb file, for example, or even a 10mb file, for that matter. Also, you can actually sign up for yahoo without having to beg someone who's currently a member. Their invite only system with gmail and orkut really leaves a sour taste in my mouth.

    I've used Yahoo without too many problems for some time. I've even paid for an upgraded account. Unfortunately, their site seems to be fucked at the moment, probably due to a DNS change. In any case, it's important to compare services over more than a single dimension. If I don't see the need for more than 50MB storage, why would I choose google, for example?

    1. Re:Do you really need 1 gig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually as someone who has recieved an invite from Gmail, I enjoy the feeling of being better than all of the unwashed masses. On a serious note, does Yahoo append ads to your email messages? I messages sent from hotmail getting caught by anti spam filters due to "enter to win" being stuck on the end of the message.

    2. Re:Do you really need 1 gig? by etymxris · · Score: 1
      On a serious note, does Yahoo append ads to your email messages?
      It depends on the package. The free account, yes. Many of the paid for packages do not, however. And I was just able to get to my Yahoo account. W00t!
  68. Did you click on the link by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    in the article? Wait. That isn't as stupid as it sounds.

    For those who RTFA's (and so many complain about registering that some of you have too) you will find there was no registration required.

    For those who didn't RTFA continue to post alternate links so other people can not read them.

  69. Ads by judithm · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the change in storage will do to the number of ads displayed in Yahoo's mail. I haven't used their email in quite a number of years, but from what I remember they had quite a lot of ads. All things considered, in order for Yahoo to give 25 times more space than they had previously, there is a likelihood that advertising will go up as well. I wonder how other free email services will respond to this.

  70. Heh by Ikn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The majority of people I know already dislike Yahoo and LOVE Google (don't we all?), so upgrading their service (and still not meeting Google's offering) isn't really going to help anything at all.

    --
    I know nothing
    1. Re:Heh by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The majority of people I know already dislike Yahoo and LOVE Google (don't we all?), so upgrading their service (and still not meeting Google's offering) isn't really going to help anything at all.
      The majority of people I know are quite the opposite; they love Yahoo! (because of the ability to acess multiple services with a single login) and don't care for Google (which currently does not offer to the public the range of services that Yahoo! does and requires multiple logins for what little it does offer).

      The plural of anecdote however is not data.

      The facts are this; Yahoo! exists, has a large user base, and offers multiple services. Google has an unknown userbase, and offers few services (with many of those being in beta).

  71. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah - microsoft.com resolves, but not www.microsoft.com. Same with gmail.google.com, and www.google.com.
    I imagine some people at Akamai are sweating a bit right now :)

  72. Spam Filtering - Check! by beachplum · · Score: 1

    I have had a Yahoo account so long I that I had a 6MB account before the upgrade today. Yahoo has the best spam filtering of any of the free web based accounts I tried and they do NOT count messages in your "Bulk" folder toward your space quota. One click deletes them in a painless yet satisfying action. I occasionally get spam in my "Inbox" but really, it's a fairly rare occurrence. Altogether I have been happy with their handling of spam and I use that account a lot.

    1. Re:Spam Filtering - Check! by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      Everyone keeps saying that Yahoo has the best spam filtering--I agree on their back-end system, but their user-defined system could use some help--I've wanted to define a wildcarded filter in their system for a while (since I only have 15 filters available to me), and I can't seem to find a way to say "send all messages with the text '(rd.cgi|uns.php|unsubscribe.php)?(e|email)=[myadd ress])' to the trash" in a single filter.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  73. Great service ! by spago · · Score: 1

    I've been very happy with my paid Yahoo! account, and since I joined when it first came out I actually have a nice userid. As I travel and work on multiple computers it's incredibly useful to have all my email available from anywhere. Plus, I can download my POP mail into Yahoo!, the SPAM filtering has been quite accurate lately, and the interface is very usable. Now with a 2GB quota and the elimination of the big adverts, at $20/year it's an amazing service for a great price. This weekend I'm going to slap together a little archive/encrypt/e-mail backup script and suddenly I've got instant backup service for all my computers. Sure Gmail might be free, but it's not here yet, and why go through the hassle of changing my email address everywhere just to save a couple of bucks?
    -Steve

  74. Here is the thing by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
    Do people REALLY need this much space. I mean seriously if almost 70% of your mail is junk, and you take care of your junk filters, do people, even getting email at work, really get all that much email to warrent this?

    Better yet what is the max attachment limit. Because while I could see 1 gig if your attachment limit was 500 meg or 250 meg, if its the standard 5 - 10 meg, then whats the point, you couldnt send big files via it anyway and would be back to FTPing things to each other.

    Sorry I just dont see the point of this, If you need this much space, maybe its better to start up your own email server.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  75. Current SBC DSL Customers by vaportrailz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    get the 2GB / no adv version @ no additional cost. /happy DSL customer @ $29/ mo for 256/1.5

    1. Re:Current SBC DSL Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just received an e-mail last night from SBC telling me that my e-Mail box is now set to 2GB with NO ADS!! Also, the max message size has been increased to 10MB!

      All this for no extra charge. At this rate, screw IMAP. I can keep everything on the server at SBC. Let's just hope they backup my mail on a regular basis. I can just imaging the horror of losing that much e-mail due to HW issues at SBC.

  76. Re:annoying I can only delete 25 messages at a tim by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

    If you go into options, you can set your view to show up to 200 messages at one time (under "General Preferences").

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  77. In yahoo spain by mancontr · · Score: 1

    I've just loged in in my yahoo spain acount, and it have only the same 6MB that it have ever had... is this a change for US only? or it's a bug? "Estás utilizando el 0% de los 6.0MB disponibles." (You're using 0% of 6.0Mb avaliable)

  78. Yahoo's killer feature - spam filtering, not size by xylix · · Score: 1
    It's been a good month for email. Last Friday I logged into my Blooger account (which I haven't done for over 6 months) and discovered an invitation to join Gmail. D'Oh! - why didn't I check that back in April!

    Then today I got an email from yahoo saying I was being upgraded for free - 2GB of space, no more ads etc. (YAH!)

    I haven't used Gmail for all that long now, but my vote is with Yahoo. I have paid for yahoo for a couple years now because I want POP forwarding and the abiliity to DL my messages into Entourage on my own computer, instead of everything being on the 'net. I would be convienient to have messages archived on the web interface as well, but a standalone email program is still superior (and faster for going through old emails) than a web based one.

    The other killer feature of Yahoo is their Spam filter. I just clued into that a couple months ago and gave it a try. VERY impressive filtering. I check the spam folder every couple of days, but in 2 months it has only mistakenly caught a very small handful of legit email. (The funny thing is that it things that the occassional email FROM Yahoo is spam!) Likewise there are only an extremely smal number of real spam that haven't been filtered out. I am sure that Google will add spam filtering before they open up the service to the world, but as it is, this feature alone puts Yahoo above Gmail even with a fraction of the space available for storage.

    One thing neither company has caught onto yet is a need / desire for throw-away addresses. What savy net user gives their real address when asked to fill in all those registration forms all over the net. (Can anyone say New York Times?). I don't need 1 GB of storage for that. I don't need a fraction. What I would like is some sub-email address that I can turn on and off, and even change the address (randomly?) but view from within the same Yahoo / Gmail web interface.

  79. It's not so much the 100MB of storage... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...but the new 10MB per message size limit.

    Yahoo now matches Gmail in message size capacity, so Yahoo won't have pissed off subscribers trying to send or receive large attachments between Yahoo and Gmail accounts.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  80. Mine's still 4Mb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :( I couldn't be asked to read that article completley (a bit too long for me), but its 100Mb for free accounts isn't it? I'm sure I'm signing up on a US server...

  81. No news is good news by kd4evr · · Score: 1

    The headline should not be "Hooraay - more MBs at Yahoo!"...
    It should be something like "Damn - what have these guys done to their system?"

    Only latest-and-greatest browsers are suported, so I mostly get nag-nag-nag that I should upgrade and only if I'm lucky, I see what is supposed to be my account. Meanwhile, I keep crashing into other peoples accounts - not seeing their messages, but again, an invitiation to upgrade to Browser 9.whatever...

    Don't tell me - they've outsourced to India and are using the difference in salaries not only to profit but also to buy a TB or two storage?

    1. Re:No news is good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I regularly check my Yahoo mail via Lynx and Links over a ssh connection to my home machine due to "interesting" conversations that I don't really want in my cache on my work machine, and it works great. I actually found the new interface is significantly cleaner (for instance the menus appears to be mostly CSS based, which means they now appear in full at the bottom of the page) on text browsers. I've NEVER seen a nag-nag-nag for upgrades with Lynx or anything else. Sounds like someone is trolling.

  82. $19.99? pshaw, why not FREE 2GB Email? by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    AdventureMail

    Although they are kindof evil...

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
    1. Re:$19.99? pshaw, why not FREE 2GB Email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      notice the "ads by google" bull at the bottom of the 3finersalute page, at least the banner i can block with mozilla

    2. Re:$19.99? pshaw, why not FREE 2GB Email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, right...

      "We are currently not accepting new registrations. Accounts can be purchased in our store (http://www.aventuremail.co.uk/store) in the mean time."

  83. Size doesn't really matter! by jbarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the other features such as Search, Labels, Conversations, Keyboard Shortcuts, and a lightning-fast interface that leverage the larger storage space. Anyone can offer tons of space, but unless you provide tools to effectivly utilize it, it's just space.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Size doesn't really matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo does have kbd shortcuts. One thing about Yahoo mail is it's sloooooooooo. There's no option for a light interface, either.

    2. Re:Size doesn't really matter! by geek · · Score: 1

      Your statement is so true. spymac.com offers 1G also but the interface sucks and the bugs/downtime are atrocious. The 1G is of zero use to me as a result. I actually got better service from them when it was 10megs.

  84. The evils of capitalism by santos_douglas · · Score: 5, Funny

    and unbridled competition are once again evident as Yahoo has used its monopoly power to force an additional 96MB of space on us all!

    1. Re:The evils of capitalism by br00tus · · Score: 1

      Being as the Internet came out of a decades-long government project financed by taxpayers, and that a good chunk of the R&D costs for hard drives and such came from government, usually military, contracts, I'd question how much competition and capitalism has to do with Internet success from the mid 1990s until now. Government spending billions on a project over decades of time and then handing it over the corporations does not sound like the standards competitive capitalism story I am told about in the corporate media.

  85. Problems with upgrade by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

    My account was upgraded when I woke up this morning. There was a problem, however. Now, I can't send HTML email any more. Anybody else having this problem?

    1. Re:Problems with upgrade by rbb · · Score: 4, Funny

      You call not being able to send HTML mail a problem?

      It's a new feature! ;-)

      --
      In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
    2. Re:Problems with upgrade by osssmkatz · · Score: 1

      This doesn't make sense. Do you mean you can't manually send HTML mail (by clicking "Allow HTML Tags")? Do you get the IE Rich Text editor buttons? This is controlled by IE, not by Yahoo! (do not argue with the semantics of that statement).

      What happens when you try to send HTML Mail?

      --Sam

    3. Re:Problems with upgrade by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      I use Mozilla. There is no longer a "Allow HTML Tags" checkbox on the compose email screen (not for me, anyway). When I use HTML in a message, it comes through as plain text.

      I also tried IE, and I only vaguely remember how it worked. I think there were two views, one was the rich text thing and the other was a HTML source view or something like that. I messed around with it for a while, but couldn't get into the source view.

    4. Re:Problems with upgrade by Blastercorps · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those that are overrun with spam, virii and anything else that can be embedded in an html this actually IS a feature.

    5. Re:Problems with upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, I'd very much like this "feature" to be rolled out on a massive scale by every email software writer in existence. Oh well, a guy can dream.

  86. Doesn't matter ... by loconet · · Score: 1

    It doesn't really matter that they've raised the limit. I've always disliked yahoo, I'm not sure if it's its ads filled pages or what not but I just tried composing a test e-mail and got over 5 errors trying to get to the compose screen which I couldn't even get to. Error connecting to my.yahoo.com edit.yahoo.com f501.yahoo.com, etc etc etc . 100 mbs for all the hoops I have to jump through, is not worth it.

    --
    [alk]
  87. Update your account options by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    I went for 2.5 years without getting any SPAM. Why? Because I set the account preferences turning off any options to receive third party mailings from the time I initially signed on.

    There's a catch, though. Yahoo! reserves the right to change their policies at any time - whereby they probably reset everyone's options and no one realizes it until they've received 80billion SPAM messages.

    I think the only SPAM I get is because I released my e-mail address while on a message board and a bot grabbed it.

    Practice web safety and you'll pretty much be in the clear. I still have one account that only receives 1 SPAM a month and that is because some generator guessed it correctly.

  88. Please stop the NYT bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arg.. I'm so sick of things like "Soul-sucking registration required"... you're getting access to argueably the finest journalistic content on the web - it's a FREE account so stop whining.

    1. Re:Please stop the NYT bashing by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Right, because the New York Times knows the meaning of journalistic integrity.

      *snicker*

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  89. Speaking of Yahoo and Google by jkabbe · · Score: 1

    Where did the internet go? It's broken!

    yahoo
    google
    msn searchs

    all gone....

    1. Re:Speaking of Yahoo and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google seems to be back up but Yahoo is still down, and many other sites. I'm guessing maybe Akamai is having problems and it's affecting all their customers.

    2. Re:Speaking of Yahoo and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but apple.com seems fine, and it's akamai based ( at least partialy )

  90. My Yahoo Plus account... by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
    now has a 2Gb limit (yay!), but they messed with the fonts and backgrounds and it's exceedingly difficult to read.

    Huge mailbox, tiny fonts, awful window contrast...hmmm. They need to work on it.

    1. Re:My Yahoo Plus account... by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      I have a Yahoo! Plus account thru SBC DSL and it got upgrade from 75mb to 2Gb as well.

      My free Yahoo account also got the 100mb upgrade.

      Who knows what I'll do with all this storage. I guess I won't have to empty my Spam folder as often......

      And the 10mb limit on attachments is still too small IMO. Although I don't know it they increased it for pay accounts.

    2. Re:My Yahoo Plus account... by osssmkatz · · Score: 1

      You should contact Yahoo! Customer Care. I've gotten help from them when I need it. As a Plus customer, you should also get help. Otherwise, you could wait and see whether they successfully straighten things out. --Sam

    3. Re:My Yahoo Plus account... by vk2 · · Score: 1

      What ? you want to email linux isos now ?

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    4. Re:My Yahoo Plus account... by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      Who knows what I'll do with all this storage. I guess I won't have to empty my Spam folder as often......

      In Yahoo mail, messages in the Bulk folder don't count toward your storage quota. I believe this is a relatively new feature.

      I was quite surprised to see the 100MB upgrade this morning, and my first thought was "ah, now they have to compete with GMail"...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    5. Re:My Yahoo Plus account... by dhawton · · Score: 0

      It looks great for me... I'm running Opera. Only thing is, I keep getting connection closed from remote server.

  91. Re:What happenned to the Firefox article? by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

    Seeing as Taco is wearing the daddypants at the moment (ie. he's selecting and posting new stories to the front page), maybe he got more excited about the Yahoo! story. Also, there was an article about the release candidate for Firefox 0.9 a few days back, so most people would have shouted 'Dupe!' on reflex... :)

    -MT.

    --
    -MT.
  92. I offer Gmail for a logo for my distro by stm2 · · Score: 1

    Little off-topic, but I wanted to tell everybody that DNALinux is looking for a graphic logo. In return, we offer a Gmail account to the best logo.
    Here is more info.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  93. UNGA BUNGA ME LIKEY! by curtisk · · Score: 1

    Sorry to go all Capt. Caveman on ya, but I just signed in and the upgrade is already there. I've been using my yahoo acct for years now, so I had the ol' 6MB limit, and its pretty damn good for a free web based email...but all this extra space is a real good thing. I like it in that I don't have to go sign up elsewhere and don't have to tell everyone my new email address

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  94. Multimedia spam = free pR0n? by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new multimedia pR0n overlords.
    (Or should that be overloads? ;-)

  95. gmail invite marked as spam by Yahoo! by zhevek · · Score: 1

    Hahah, I just sent a gmail invite to a friend, and their yahoo address marked the gmail invite as junk mail! What a crock, yahoo is trying so hard to not lose business. Make a better business model, and they wouldn't!

  96. Free 2 GB for Yahoo DSL users? by Smack · · Score: 1

    I just logged onto the account that came with my SBC Yahoo DSL, and it says I'm using "0% of 2.0GB". And this is just with the standard $30/month DSL plan.

    So that's actually cool.

  97. I knew I'd see somethign here. by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

    When I logged into my Yahoo! email this morning I was notified that because I'm a SBC DSL subscriber, I now have a 2GB mail box AND no more graphical ads. I love it already.

  98. Now all I need... by JohnDoe.Slashed · · Score: 0

    ...is POP/IMAP and a way for Longhorn to boot over POP/IMAP... that way I won't have to download that viruses and worms and wonderful things. This might mean that nigerian fellow of mine will have an account on my machine... so many opportunities...

  99. Cool idea by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great idea!!

    Being forced to have IE, mozilla and opera open at the same time with your 3 logins when you want to search for some thing would be ultra cool

    Damn!! I am not a genius

  100. If they have by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    If Gmail or Yahoo decide to give free Pop access they won my non-paying business :) Presently I use one yahoo for spam mail, one yahoo for day to day purchases, resumes and emails from strangers. And then I have MyWay mail for all my close personal friends which I tell to not place me in a CC line (bcc is much better) :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  101. installed userbase? by cuzality · · Score: 1

    ...Like sarah_cutie1@yahoo.com and sk8er_chick4092@yahoo.com? Hee hee.

    Look, the reason I'm gonna go with Google for my free webmail is that I actually have a chance of getting something decent as my name, instead of some misspelled-word+four-digit-number...

    1. Re:installed userbase? by luferbu · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's my girlfriend's email address! hehe

    2. Re:installed userbase? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better be quick to find an invitation then. Names are going fast.

  102. how to get rid of ads by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those who might be curious, I found an easy way to get rid of ads when reading your gmail (if for some reason, ads really bother you).

    Just ask everyone to put the word "died" at the end of their messages. Gmail has this filter that tries not to be too insensitive by plastering your browser with ads for caskets next to news that Uncle Bob just died, so I guess it searches for words like that.

    I tried with the words "disaster", "died", etc. and they all caused ads to disappear.

    It might be creepy though after a while if every email had the word "died" at the bottom.... )

    1. Re:how to get rid of ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What needs more of an effort though? Reading an advert, or trying to convince everyone who emails you to include keywords?

    2. Re:how to get rid of ads by nbensa · · Score: 1

      Bah; send a null browser id and voilà

    3. Re:how to get rid of ads by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      What if you append "in bed" to every subject?

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  103. I don't interface by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    with many geeks anymore but from what tell you, everyone I know uses Yahoo mail and I don't know a single person yet who uses Gmail.

    1. Re:I don't interface by Ikn · · Score: 1

      That probably has something to do with the fact that Gmail hasn't been opened/released/whatever yet :)

      --
      I know nothing
    2. Re:I don't interface by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Hi, nice to meet you. I use gmail, and my yahoo account gets roughly one email per day that gets past the spam filter, from Jenny who would like me to meet her friends.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  104. Competition from Google will only improve Yahoo by erykjj · · Score: 1

    Just give it time.

  105. Using it now by Derkec · · Score: 1

    I've got the equivilant of a paid Yahoo account through my ISP. They've cleanup the interface, and there are no adds that I can see - text or otherwise.

    2 gigs is plenty of space, but doesn't really strike me as being significantly differant that one gig. But then again, I'll probably find a way to use it.

    As a customer, I'm really happy with this shift. Mostly because the interface is cleaner and easier to read. The extra space wasn't going to be needed for six months at the earliest, but is nice to have now.

    Still, when gmail rolls out, I'll give it a shot. I'll want to see how the searching and threaded conversations work.

    I did have an email sent to me today with a large attachment. It seems to have been split up into three emails and I can't get the attachment. I'm not sure if the sending program (outlook) is to blame or to Yahoo, but I'm not real happy about the situation.

  106. Mailing AOL CDs! by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
    Now AOL can e-mail their CDs to Yahoo and Gmail users, instead of snail-mailing {flat metal tins | plastic boxes | jewel cases | cardboard envelopes}.

    Of course, the solid waste hauling unions may sue AOL for the sudden reduction in trash volume...

  107. Bull SHIT by mfh · · Score: 1

    > The Gmail Web interface isn't all that impressive

    I have to call bullshit on that. I'm a beta member and I have to say that Gmail is the *most* impressive email client I have ever laid eyes on. Anyone who says otherwise is a stakeholder on another project, or just playing devil's advocate for some obscure reasons.

    Everything about Gmail is 100% fucking awesome!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Bull SHIT by clontzman · · Score: 1

      I have to call bullshit on that. I'm a beta member and I have to say that Gmail is the *most* impressive email client I have ever laid eyes on. Anyone who says otherwise is a stakeholder on another project, or just playing devil's advocate for some obscure reasons.


      It's not "bullshit," dude... it's an opinion. I'm a beta member too and I'm not trying to "derail" gmail. I just don't think it's all that. The contact tools in gmail are really primitive and for features, Hotmail and Yahoo kinda own it right now.

  108. My Yahoo has a new look by CaramelCod · · Score: 1

    If you haven't noticed yet, My Yahoo has a whole new look to go with the 100Mb of mail storage. Rounded edges and fonts. They never can leave well enough alone.

    1. Re:My Yahoo has a new look by g-doo · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to my.yahoo.com? Mine still looks the same, and I still have the old outdated My Yahoo! logo. Perhaps they only changed the default purple skin.

    2. Re:My Yahoo has a new look by CaramelCod · · Score: 1

      I can't get into the basic My Yahoo now. I was actually referring to the calendar / Mail / Address Book section of My Yahoo. I can still get into Yahoo's home page and assorted links. /East Coast

  109. 2 GB? 4 GB? by moehoward · · Score: 1


    I have a 50 MB Yahoo! Plus! Account!. My friend has a 25 MB! Yahoo! Plus! Account!

    What will I get for the extra money I gave them? 2 GB? 4 GB? A dedicated server?

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:2 GB? 4 GB? by Nynaeve · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFM. From the article:

      Yahoo's increased storage calls into question its longstanding business of selling larger mailboxes to its users. Its prices have ranged from $9.99 a year for a 10-megabyte mailbox, to $49.99 a year for 100 megabytes, the size it now offers free. Customers of the services will be converted to Yahoo's new two-gigabyte Plus service. Customers who are content with the 100-megabyte free account will be able to request refunds.

    2. Re:2 GB? 4 GB? by moehoward · · Score: 1


      Well, I just spent the last 20 minutes trying to "request my refund".

      Don't believe everything you read, jerk.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    3. Re:2 GB? 4 GB? by Luminous · · Score: 1

      How is that his fault? And I assure you, Yahoo will give you the refund. Just because they haven't responded to you in the first 24 hours of implementing this new thing doesn't mean they won't ever respond to you.

      Lighten up -- Jerk.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  110. Yahoo is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They offered 100MB today, and now their service is down? And has been at least for the last 20-30 minutes.

  111. Yahoo Loyalty by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

    Yep. My girlfriend (out of college) has used Yahoo mail for several years. i cannot even come close to convincing her to change to any other service; not even our ISP's (cox cable) mail with huge storage and even after showing her she can use Thunderbird, Evolution, or others....she likes yahoo, uses yahoo, trusts the spam guards and to tell you the truth about the whole ordeal, the reason she won't change: Yahoo is just there...regardless of where you are, what ISP you are using (no one has banned yahoo yet have they!? heh :). i see her point on that one. My tune may change now that i've graduated (computer engineering) and my school acounts will go away (like i'd give those bastards more money to keep my "vanity" school email account open! :) We shall see. i'll tell you one thing though, we do NOT use the same services for email and for searching, so no gMail for me :(

    1. Re:Yahoo Loyalty by etymxris · · Score: 1

      I've used Yahoo for ages, tried other things, and have always gone back. Why? Webmail is extremely convenient. I can be on the road and check it from there. I have 5 computers. If I'm using Thunderbird or Mozilla, and download the messages from the server, it (by default) deletes them, and saves them to the local harddrive. I can change this, but then it redownloads the messages on each computer. I also frequently upgrade my computers, putting all my data at risk. Furthermore, what if a Mozilla or Thunderbird changes the underlying database format? It may be less of a problem now but it was certainly a problem several years ago. But overall, I've found webmail in general is just easier.

    2. Re:Yahoo Loyalty by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      To each his own. I dumped Yahoo when they dumped POP access. I see no reason to return. I may or may not try gmail.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Yahoo Loyalty by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I have a couple of webmail accounts, and have to agree with your GF. Webmail is extremely convenient. Being able to only check your mail from your home computer would be like being able to take phone calls only at your home. Also, Yahoo has always been pretty fast and reliable. I have an email account with my ISP (Cox cable) that I've never even used, and why would I want to? Those morons can't keep my cable modem service running without problems, why would I trust them with the email service too? At least they're not nearly as bad as my previous ISP, MSN w/ Qwest (what a horrible experience that was). And of course, what happens when you move, change ISPs, etc.? You have to tell everyone your new email address, and still probably miss some mail. There's a lot to be said for being able to keep your email address indefinitely.

  112. Hehe! by mfh · · Score: 1

    I think it's funny to read all these Yahoo supporters try to derail Gmail. Haven't they learned anything yet? Google == God.

    > I guess it's OK if she already paid Yahoo, but for anyone who didn't, it's not even comparable.

    Agreed. Gmail is sooooo nice, and free.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  113. you can always have BOTH by jakethejuggalo · · Score: 1

    when GMail comes out considering they're free, so there's no use arguing over which is best :)

  114. 100 MB and soul sucking are too much by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase our dear old friend bill
    6 MB ought to be enough for anybody
    Applies atleast for me. Unless you have ppl in your address book who keep sending 2 MB check-this-joke word docs, clearing anything not important once in every 2 days should be more than sufficient.

    Why is it that every poster tries to picture NYTimes as some vampire?!?
    (Soul sucking registration required)
    When one can sign up in yahoo for using their mail service, how can it be painful (or more painful) to register on nytimes once!?! It's not that you'll have to register every time you view a page.
    Let them save the cookie monsieur, unless you are paranoid about them tracking which articles you go through.

  115. Re:Effective Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any mail with your own address in the from field commonly IS spam. I agree it's stupid that they don't make an exception when it's actually sent from your own account, but how often does that happen on purpose under normal circumstances?

  116. 2 gig? by AgentGray · · Score: 1

    Um...I was already paying for the 19.95 POP3 service. I got the 2 gig already. The interface, while still yahoo, looks very simplististic, a la you know who.

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
  117. My Yahoo! Mail is now 2 gigs by eberry · · Score: 1

    I was pleasently surprised when I logged in this morning to see that I now have 2 gigs of space and they removed the ads. And the interface has been upgraded.

    Btw, I am a Yahoo! Mail Plus user. It was nice of Google to force all this competition. I was continously at 90% usage of my mailbox, now I am at 1%.

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
  118. Take that! by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Take that, Gmail! We'll fight you with ... uh ... less. Now *that* is minimalism.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  119. gmail == awesome by sage2k6 · · Score: 1

    WTF are you talking 'bout? just got mine yesterday, and i have to say......google's had it right... my personal favorite being the ability to group mail, and that the replys back & forth between two persons actually appears together...... no more looking through 200 emails to find that original...

    --

    -----
    "If everything seems to be going well, you obviously don't know what the hell is going on." - Murphy's Law
  120. 300GB of email storage by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I have 300 GB of email storage available to me right now on my local hard drive. Give me POP3 access and let me pull down my messages so I can worry about retaining them. I don't trust my data to some company with no interest in the integrity of my data.

    I've had messages stored on web-based email accounts dump my messages due to server failure, during routine upgrades, because I hadn't logged in to the account for a month, or who knows what other reason.

    Google may not do all of that, but if I can't back up important messages to an offline storage medium that I physically own, I'm not interested.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  121. Mail AND Calendar by squidfrog · · Score: 1

    All I know is, the new colors are awful even using my old color scheme. Everything's muddier. I guess they had to make it "different" so people would notice more than the extra 0 on their storage space count.

    Yahoo Calendar has also become pretty unreadable; on my 1280x1024 monitor, the lines between days are about, ohhh, 1 pixel wide. And light gray. On a white background. All your events just kinda "float" there if you look at it from a distance--like reading time on a watch with no numbers. (Although, I hear some people prefer this.) I believe this look used to be reserved for their Printable View so the lines would turn up nice and sharp on a printer.

    <sigh>

  122. Save messages offline from Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently i wanted to save all messages stored in my yahoo mail account offline, POP3 was payware so i looked for alternatives, the closest i got was Koopaasa which is basically a browser with capabilities do download links available on a webpage further more the saved files are appended thus i could download all messages into one big html file with all the yahoo mail ads and formatting - which i didn't like.

    Does anyone have any suggestions on what i can do?

  123. Re:And POP forwarding and access ... by ftvcs · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and pop access

  124. Why do you have so much email? by prwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand the need for these gargantuan email boxes. My personal (non-work) IMAP mailbox has mail dating back to July 2002 (all of my email before that is archived and I never look at it), and it's just under 60 megabytes. At that rate, I would reach Yahoo!'s limit by the end of 2008, at which point I would probably just archive my email again. My work email is an entirely separate, company-provided account, but I still only have 186 megabytes of email going back to May 2000. 46.5 megabytes per year.

    I think if you're using 1-2 GB for your email, then you should consider some non-email ways of managing your data. There are already many sites on the internet that archive mailing lists, so there's no need to keep around a personal copy of list mail. Purging the Trash and deleting spam messages helps to save space. Instead of emailing large files, consider serving them up on the web, ftp, etc. Even if you do email large files, there's no need to keep them in your mailbox after they are downloaded. Save them to your computer, burn them to a CD if needed, and delete them.

    Then again, maybe everyone else on the internet is just way more popular than I am.

    1. Re:Why do you have so much email? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in principle that there are much better ways to manage mail, including large attachments. Unfortunately from my experience most people who actively started using computers with the web like to use their email inbox as a filing cabinet. They don't understand the filesystem on their hard drive but they do understand using the email system.
      Our inbox limit at work is 300MB and there are a lot of users (mostly sales people with gimantic pdf attachments) who frequently go over the limit.
      I do think that a lot of it is laziness and that once you stop cleaning it out a bit everyday it just builds up into an awful mess. Not to mention people who never bother to clear out their sent items compounding the problem.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:Why do you have so much email? by prwood · · Score: 1

      I use my email like a filing cabinet, but I use a lot more discretion than most folks about which email I keep and which I trash. The email from Bob that says "Where should we all go for lunch today?" or the email from John that says "Check out the hilarious photo!" are definite trashers. There's just no reason to keep them around. But the email from management that says "Here are the specs for project XYZ" gets filed in the appropriate email folder.

  125. Ummm.... by Bobman1235 · · Score: 1

    Is yahoo susceptible to the slashdot effect? I haven't been able to get into it since this story came out. How can you slashdot YAHOO??

    If my fantasy baseball team (service hosted by yahoo) suffers because of this you will all pay....

  126. Re:Yahoo's killer feature - spam filtering, not si by net_oholic · · Score: 1

    "One thing neither company has caught onto yet is a need / desire for throw-away addresses."

    Ask and you shall receive.

    "AddressGuard is a feature of your Yahoo! Mail Plus subscription. It lets you create disposable email addresses to use whenever you do not want to give out your real Yahoo! Mail Address.

    Messages sent to any of your disposable email addresses will be automatically forwarded to your Yahoo! Mail account, and you can decide to direct these messages to a specific folder.

    If any of your disposable email addresses start getting spam, you can simply delete it and messages sent to this address will start bouncing instead of filling up your account."

  127. Gmail by Trillian_Angel · · Score: 1

    I just recently got a gmail account, and I love how flexible it is.. I love being able to use the lables in conjunction with (myemail)+filterIwant@gmail.com to make automated filters, etc.

    I found that much more convient than most freebe mail types. Also, its much much much faster to load than yahoo, and yahoo doesn't follow the conversations easily. The conversations I find make things a LOT easier. Instead of looking through 1,000 email threads, I can look through one conversation and locate the tab/entry I'm looking for with little fuss.

    Yahoo would have to do that plus a lot more to make me even remotely impressed with 100 megs. :)

    And oh, labels are king. Labels will rule the world. Labels can be placed on several different emails without having copy the email, fwd another copy to yourself or otherwise go through hassle to make the email show up in two different folders. Saves space, too.

    (No, I don't like my gmail account, not at all... and no, you can't have any of my invites. Miiine.)

    --
    -- RJ
  128. Microsoft's response for Hotmail!!! by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see what Microsoft would be doing with hotmail to be in competition with yahoo and gmail.
    The only changes that I had seen in hotmail in the past 3-4 years are a decrease in the inbox space to a mere 2 megs, some zazzy icons and some improvements in the spam filtering.

    People say Microsoft doesn't go innovative with their browser, OSes and the office suites because of almost zero competition (ie after ensuring that competition is almost zero). But what in the free-email wars??

    Or is it that hotmail is doomed to be lost in history like the dot-com boom of which it had been one of the catalysts

  129. Isn't competition wonderful? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    There is nothing like a little competition to put the fear of god into companies (and politicians) who have grown complacent and arrogant. This is yet another example.

    That is one of the great things about open source software, even if you never use it. Every windows XP, MS-Office and IE user should give thanks to Linux, Open Office, and Mozilla every time they boot. MS comes under pressure to lower prices and develop new features, whenever open source products can match or exceed their offerings. Even if you keep your Yahoo! account and never even look at GMail, you have derived benefit from them.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  130. Inbox: 205 Bulk: 1790 by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    I've really struggled to keep my Yahoo! Mail account in check. There are a lot of messages that I want to archive. At the same time, I'm constantly getting new email that I need to read or file. 4mb has added up to 205 email messages for me. I, for one, welcome the new 100mb upgrade.

    If anything, it gives my inbox the chance to grow as big as my "Bulk" (spam) folder. I haven't cleaned it out since 05/29 (two and a half weeks), and I've got 1790 messages waiting for me to review if they're real or not. The good thing is, the bulk folder doesn't count against your quota. (Sounds like a feature that is ripe for a 'sploit, to me.)

  131. It wasn't really true though by denjin · · Score: 1

    I got that error too, late last night. However, messages didn't bounce at that time, and it is now showing I have 2GB of space.

    Just a minor quirk I think...and it all appears ironed out.

  132. mail.yahoo.com - non-existent in DNS by Tree131 · · Score: 1
    At first I thought it was /. effect on yahoo mail - everybody is signing up for new accounts, but then I tried a DNS lookup and:

    > server 144.92.9.22
    Default Server: dns.doit.wisc.edu
    Address: 144.92.9.22

    > lookup mail.yahoo.com
    DNS request timed out.
    timeout was 2 seconds.
    *** Can't find address for server mail.yahoo.com: Timed out
    1. Re:mail.yahoo.com - non-existent in DNS by Tree131 · · Score: 1

      Guess I have to reply to my own post. It's now resolving...

  133. Just delete via POP3 then? by denjin · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but most mail clients I've used let me keep messages on the server. But, I can also tell them to delete messages if I want once they are emptied from my trash or something. At least this is how I've kept my Yahoo account pruned.

  134. yahoo email interface ?? by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0
    I logged in my yahoo.ca email account in hope that it becomes 100MB capacity. Blah, it's still 6MB. and yet it has the new interface as ugly as email@yahoo.com.



    oh, wait. the interface keeps changing between the old and new interface while i clik on differ email foler. what's up with that ?!

  135. 100 Mb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will they compete with my mailserver sitting in the closet with about 20Gb, no adverts, no extra fees, secure imap & pop3 access, etc?

  136. Opera compatible changes? by MooFu · · Score: 1

    The old Yahoo interface was mostly fine with Opera 6.05 and 7.51. This new one technically works, but many things like the move to other folder list are not sitting right. Anyone else have this problem?

    Any ideas on getting Yahoo to work with browsers other then IE?

    1. Re:Opera compatible changes? by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

      I was about to post on the same issue... Guess the big boys don't care about people who aren't part of the unwashed masses. Pressing the Delete button doesn't work either... I wonder how FireFox is handling it....

      --
      Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
      A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    2. Re:Opera compatible changes? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Can't send email. Just tried
      The Javascript fails for some reason.

    3. Re:Opera compatible changes? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently they were in the middle of updating the site. I see things changing on every click. Firefox just started working.

  137. Look at what else you get for $20 ($0 w/ SBC DSL) by net_oholic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "One thing neither company has caught onto yet is a need / desire for throw-away addresses."

    Ask and you shall receive.

    "AddressGuard is a feature of your Yahoo! Mail Plus subscription. It lets you create disposable email addresses to use whenever you do not want to give out your real Yahoo! Mail Address.

    Messages sent to any of your disposable email addresses will be automatically forwarded to your Yahoo! Mail account, and you can decide to direct these messages to a specific folder.

    If any of your disposable email addresses start getting spam, you can simply delete it and messages sent to this address will start bouncing instead of filling up your account."

  138. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by sparcnut · · Score: 1

    I tried to go check my Yahoo account this morning and... uhh... DNS is dead. Figured I'd better check Slashdot and sure 'nuff, Akamai has been SLASHDOTTED!!!

    Does it feel good to pull down a giant like Akamai? Huh? (Do you feel lucky, PUNK?) :-)

    Akamai has now come back up a little shakily and sure enough, I have a 100MB Yahoo account, even though I wasn't cramped with 6MB. With this expansion, I will likely not be using Gmail when it goes out of beta unless the UI really is that much better.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  139. Even before this by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    Yahoo, once upon a time, was also search engine. (Yes, yes, it was called the Yahoo directory, but it did eventually do crawling) And a pretty good one, too

    It was a tasty drink! oh wait a minute.

  140. Crappy UI Changes Too by fupeg · · Score: 1

    The new "streamlined" interface kinda sucks though. What's with all the Windows 95 buttons all over the place? How is that "streamlined" over using native buttons? It's really annoying on a Mac too, though I would think it would look ugly on Win XP if you were using the Luna UI.

    1. Re:Crappy UI Changes Too by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      It's really annoying on a Mac too
      Yeah, I just noticed that too. Maybe we should give them some feedback (Sorry, best link I could find).
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  141. Just one problem... by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yahoo's mail site appears to be slashdotted. Kind of hard to take advantage of all that storage space if you can't log in. Nice planning, Yahoo.

    1. Re:Just one problem... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Yeah I noticed that too. Sometimes it loads. Sometimes the site times out. Are there really that much more people hitting their yahoo accounts just cause they have more space now?

  142. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo is NOT slashdotted. There is a widespread DNS issue associated with akamai. It affects yahoo.com, apple.com, google.com, et. al.

  143. MY story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted this story before this guy and admins allowed this guy's story first. Slashdot needs to be sleazedotted!!

  144. 100 MB of storage is quite good. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think people are forgetting the nice things about the update Yahoo! Mail:

    1. 100 MB is more than enough if you do mostly text messages. After all, most text messages are about 2-5 KB in size, a tiny fraction of the 100 MB capacity.

    2. Yahoo! Mail has excellent controls for spam filtering, and all the spam email is routed to a Bulk folder that does not count towards your normal email quota. :-)

    3. Yahoo! Mail has automatic virus checking, so it's very unlikely you'll download attachments that are viruses.

    1. Re:100 MB of storage is quite good. by cmacb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the other thing to not forget is that Yahoo is ONLY doing this in response to Gmail. Prior to that Yahoo was actually taking away features and making more things only available to paying customers. I've been a Yahoo user almost since the beginning and have been constantly disappointed with any service that I paid them for. They have a tendency to bait and switch, or simply discontinue a service when it doesn't perform as they expected. I used their text paging service (for the year it was available) their local dial-up service (ditto) and am currently using Yahoo domains (which have been lowering their price in an effort to prevent erosion, rather than adding features).

      I don't give a company credit for innovation when all they are doing is responding to REAL innovation. Gmail, from what I've seen so far is better, faster, has an interesting alternative to folders which may prove to be more effective, and has a commitment to continue adding features to their free service. Google has no add on services that you can pay for and I think they intend to keep it that way. They have Yahoo and MSN quaking in their boots and I think thats a good thing.

      I'll stick with Gmail until something BETTER, not just AS GOOD comes along.

    2. Re:100 MB of storage is quite good. by cmacb · · Score: 1

      PS: I just went to check my Yahoo mail to see if the new inbox size is in effect. I can't even sign in.

      One thing that has had too little press play is not just the notion that Google is offering more space. There is more to this than just a pricing scheme. Google thinks that their home-grown file system is better than anything else out there (and they are probably right). How better to prove that than to offer services that nobody else can match TECHNICALLY, regardless of the price point. What scares Yahoo and MSN (among others) is that their infrastructure would collapse under the load that Google is taking on. The question for Yahoo users and users of other mail services will have to ask is how slow am I willing for this service to be just to get a 100M mailbox? Google's is fast. Very fast. So much so that I am tending to use it more than even my local POP based mail program. I've never really liked web mail of any kind, but I'm begginging to change my mind. Something that never happened with the other web based mail services.

    3. Re:100 MB of storage is quite good. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Yahoo has HORRIBLE spam filtering. It's about 85% accurate, which means that when I logged into my inbox today, 320 messages had made it past their spam filter.

      If they'd just use a bayesian filter, this wouldn't be an issue.

      And should I point out that they only stopped counting bulkmail towards your quota recently? Up until they did this, I would hit 7MB (They let me exceed my 6MB quota by 1MB) within 1-2 days from my bulkmail folder filling up with hundreds of messages.

      I guess when you have an email address for 11 years with Yahoo, it becomes useless due to their poor spam filtering.

    4. Re:100 MB of storage is quite good. by Progoth · · Score: 1
      Google's is fast. Very fast. So much so that I am tending to use it more than even my local POP based mail program.

      amen

      I have my own email server, with a few other users...it's sitting right beside me on a 100mbit lan. I access it with imap (no ssl) with thunderbird on a fast machine. Gmail is way faster...it's sad.

      Now my first .procmailrc entry is:
      :0 c
      * !^From: MAILER-DAEMON@mydomain.com
      !myname@gmail.com

      So it's forwarding all my mail to my gmail acct before spamassassin...so far Gmail has only missed one spam, and caught all the others. I think pretty soon I'll have to resubscribe to everything and change the first line of my .procmailrc to :0: (to forward my emails and not even keep a local copy of them). Gmail is just most excellent.

      Things it needs:

      • remote API for checking for new mail (so's somebody can write a KDE systray mail checker)
      • GPG support...at least signing, if not encryption
      • Konqueror support (can't even login, konq/kde 3.2.1)
      • partial word search...right now it only matches whole words, apparently
    5. Re:100 MB of storage is quite good. by cmacb · · Score: 1

      PPS: Much later same day. Seems like all of Yahoo is down, or at least very very slow.

      I can't get to my Yahoo e-mail at all (Gmail is responding just fine).

      This is going to be fun to watch.

      I hope MSN offers 10G e-mail accounts soon!

  145. Have Gmail, keeping Yahoo as spam magnet only. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing people saying that Yahoo has better spam filtering?? I have never recieved Spam in my gmail account, but I get lots every day in Yahoo. Granted it is an older account I use to fill in online crap, but filtering, blah. Besides Gmail is still beta.

    Yahoo may offer good spam filtering to those who pay, but I get boatloads of spam in my pay account.

    By 7 degrees of separation, I thought everyone who wants Gmail would have one by now. Within a day of getting an invite, I had three invites of my own to give out. Within a week of someone I know getting a Gmail, everyone I know who wanted Gmail has it. I invite 3 friends, they each invite three friends and so on... In week they were stretching to find more people to invite.

    In 6 months, I suspect Gmail will be better in just about every way. I find yahoo in general has terrible customer service and will be glad to switch completely to the eventual google portal.

  146. Yahoo can finally hold important mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now those phony accounts spam always references on Yahoo will be able to hold all of the "no such address" bounce-backs.

  147. It's Simple Logic by EconomicRat · · Score: 0, Troll

    #include <iostream>

    #define SUCCESS 0
    #define FATAL_ERROR -1

    using namespace std;

    enum
    {
    Google = 1,
    Yahoo,
    SomethingWorseThanYahooIfPossible
    };

    int main (void)
    {
    int EmailService;

    cout << "Select your preferred email service provider. (1 = Google, 2 = Yahoo, 3 = SomethingElse) >";
    cin >> EmailService;

    if (EmailService == Google)
    {
    cout << "You enjoy clean interfaces, non-evil marketing functionality, and lot's of storage space!" << endl;
    return (SUCCESS);
    }
    else if ((EmailService == Yahoo) || (EmailService == SomethingWorseThanYahooIfPossible))
    {
    cout << "You enjoy cluttered interfaces, evil marketing functionality, and very little storage space!" << endl;
    cout << "You're a moron!" << endl;
    return (FATAL_ERROR);
    }
    else
    {
    cout << "Wow, you can't even follow simple instructions. You aren't worthy of the Gmail product." << endl;
    cout << "Go away!" << endl;
    return (FATAL_ERROR);
    }
    }

    --
    "What I have written, I have written." - Pontius Pilate
  148. And what does hotmail do? by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    Nothing. Nada. They still have the stupid cap at 2.0Mb of storage, and they still pester you constantly with unblockable messages to get the full hotmail account for $20/yr.

    I've been migrating registrations to point to yahoo over time, and once Gmail goes public, I'll get an account and dump MSN/Hotmail totally. I've had that hotmail account for a long time, before Microsoft even acquired hotmail. It's had more downtime than you'd think unless you use it every day. A couple days it was out for the whole day. I'm sure Google can do better.

    1. Re:And what does hotmail do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And yet Hotmail is still maintaining its positions at the top 1-5 spots in almost every single country, even though 2MB has been below average for years...

      What does that tell you about how meaningless storage limits are as a competitive factor for the vast majority of users? Sort of questions the Google strategy of driving up storage costs by offering massive amounts of storage, doesn't it?

  149. This in effect though makes 419 Spam worse... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    It just came to me, but this helps scammers (c is correct not p), they can hold more conversations and possible frauds at a time. I happen to be an anti-scammer and have seen the mailboxes of my foes... The only reason there mailing lists aren't bigger and they are only trying to nail one person at a time (trust me, I've seen guys with a few accounts at the same time running up to 4 scams at once) is because their boxes are ALWAYS full of returns from daemons... The sheep are getting restless...

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  150. Pros and cons of both by pen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo

    • Still only one tenth the space of Gmail
    • Still has annoying graphical ads.
    • but:
    • Open and available now and for everyone
    • Compatible with older browsers.
    • Integrated with Yahoo's other services like Calendar and Notepad

    Yahoo is hoping that increasing the storage space to 100MB will keep a lot of people from switching to Gmail.

    Gmail

    • 1000MB of storage
    • Great interface with convenient searching
    • Very calm and non-intrusive advertising
    • but:
    • Still a closed beta
    • Issues still being worked out (Google has been very responsive about the bugs I have reported, even though they were low-priority)
    • If you're already a Yahoo user, requires changing habits (aka new player on the field)
    • Currently only compatible with the newest browsers (Google says they're working on an alternative simpler version)
    1. Re:Pros and cons of both by requim · · Score: 1

      It's really quite simply actually. For me the decision boils down to this. I need and like having pop/smtp access to my account and I am willing to pay a little extra to have the service. For $19.99 a year I can access my email from anywhere in the world, download it to any machine I want, have access to a wonderful spam filter (close to 99% effective) and now have 2 GB of advertisement free email.

      Gmail sounds good, and I'm not saying I won't create an account when available, however, the lack of pop/smtp access is not very appealling to me, though I am interested in the effectiveness of their spam filter along with their search capabilities (though I have yet to even use yahoo's search capabilities in my email so who am I kidding.

      I have been using yahoo mail virtually since they made the service available however many years ago that was, and have been a paying subscriber since they required it for pop/smtp access. But I have no qualms about changing my email account if necessary. Though I will only do so to an address that I will presume to have till I die that does not bind me to any particular ISP etc, etc..

    2. Re:Pros and cons of both by Yeroc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have both a GMail and Yahoo account right now and I think things are still tilted more in Yahoo's favour than Google's though as GMail is still in beta this could change before they go live.

      The Addressbook in GMail is extremely minimal. All you can record is the name (one field, no separate fields for first and last name etc.), a single email address (a lot of people I know have both a personal and work address) and some freeform notes. Yahoo (and Hotmail) have substantially better Addressbooks with Hotmail being the best of the lot in my opinion.

      It'll be interesting to see how well less sophisticated (er...less technically inclined) users will adapt to GMail's idea of labels instead of hierarchical folders or if they'll quickly abandon it in favour of what they are used to.

    3. Re:Pros and cons of both by sootman · · Score: 1

      People keep harping about yahoo!'s ads. I use the email heavily--I have two jobs, so since I'm never home I have all my mail forwarded to my yahoo! account (which I had previously only used while travelling.) So, I use it all the time, and my eyes only look at the email I'm composing or reading. I don't even notice the ads much at all. Certainly not enough to be a bother. Same with web news--I start looking at the screen 3 inches from the top and don't even notice banners. (Plus I have custom /etc/hosts files everywhere, anyway. Yahoo! serves ad images from their own servers, but like I said, they don't bother me.)

      And yahoo! mail works perfectly with safari, which is great, since my primary machines at home and both jobs are OS X Macs. I don't know if gmail works with safari yet, but in the early stages of the beta, it specifically didn't.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:Pros and cons of both by pen · · Score: 1
      Personally, I find flashing animated GIF ads distracting enough, but Yahoo goes further with popups, Flash ads, Flash ads that have sound, Flash ads that jump around on the page, and "premercials" that act like a splash page with a big full-screen ad.

      I prefer Google's subtle, targeted, text-only ads. Heck, I actually click them sometimes, because they are relevant!

  151. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by adzoox · · Score: 1

    Your home mailserver may be illegal if you are using cable modem and DSL - and will most likely soon be outlawed from all consumer ISPs based on the fact that a lot of SPAM is produced from this type of "home mail server"

    Currently, my local charter cable does NOT allow one to run a server from their account or a mailserver- you must acquire a business account for $120 more - even at that their are a lot of restrictions.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  152. Spam filter by Xiadix · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else mark their notification message as spam? I did!

    KevG

  153. Re:I suspect that the difference between google an by hopemafia · · Score: 1

    I don't think yahoo sells your info....my yahoo account would be nearly free of spam if I didn't have my university account forwarding too it (even then I only get 3-4 spams per day).

    Yahoo's spam filters are also fairly good, so 95% of the spam I do receive goes directly to jail. I pay the $19.99 a year for POP access, and now they are adding all the Plus! features (2 Gig storage, 10Meg attachments, no banner adds, no taglines, and supposedly better spam filtering + antivirus) to that, which used to be another $9.99.

    They did have a bit of a bug with the switchover though, since got a message stating:
    "You are currently exceeding your Yahoo! Mail storage quota by a very large amount. You are only allowed -2048.0MB of storage but you are currently using 0.2MB of storage."
    Yes, that is negative mail storage...but it was fixd by the time I got the email, said wah?, and logged in to check it out.

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  154. What's MSN going to do? by fupeg · · Score: 1

    Microsoft says that hardware is going to be free in the future, so how much space are they going to offer?

  155. microsoft blocking g-mail invites? by spyd4r · · Score: 1

    is it possible that microsoft is blocking g-mail invites? i sent an invite to a friend on hotmail and he never recieved it, so i sent him an e-mail from my g-mail account and it went straight through.

    anyone come across this?

    1. Re:microsoft blocking g-mail invites? by spyd4r · · Score: 1

      nevermind, it eventually came through.

    2. Re:microsoft blocking g-mail invites? by MatNeh · · Score: 1

      Yahoo! filed my g-mail invite into the Bulk Mail folder ;)

    3. Re:microsoft blocking g-mail invites? by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      oh can I get a fancy g-mail invite ?

      chris@solosoft.org

      :D

  156. Firefox not working? by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

    Can anyone else confirm that Firefox has issues with the "new and improved" yahoo mail? I am using the 9.0 RC on windows. The send button does NOT work for me. It does nothing.

    I usually use fetchyahoo to grab yahoo mail to my mail server, but thought I would check out the new features of yahoo mail.

    1. Re:Firefox not working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      works fine for me

  157. Currently 10:36 EST... by raehl · · Score: 1

    And my Plus account is still 100 MB. You'd think thye'd get us paying subscribers first. And as others said, the new font sucks. I like the rest of the new look though.

    But, I ain't complaining too much - this'll save me from having to move to GMail. I've been beating my head against the 100 MB limit for quite some time now.

  158. full text from yahoo upgrade by emseabrown · · Score: 1

    We've made some great changes to your Mail sub account, effective immediately! You'll have all the features of your current Mail sub account, and many more -- at no additional cost*!

    Here's even more to love about your SBC Yahoo! Mail Plus sub account:
    Increased mail storage
    A whopping 100MB for all the important messages in your life! Keep lots of messages, photos, and documents -- think of it as your online archive.
    No graphical ads
    When you're using the Mail web interface, your experience will be even more enjoyable.
    Streamlined interface
    Makes using your mail even easier.
    So thanks again for choosing SBC Yahoo! Mail to keep in touch, and we hope you enjoy the additional services now at your fingertips. For more information, please visit our Help page.

    If you are also an SBC Yahoo! Mail Extra Storage subscriber, please note that as of 6/15/04, the price of extra storage is dropping to $9.99 a year for 2GB of storage. On that date, your sub account storage quota will automatically increase to 2GB, regardless of the extra storage package you currently subscribe to. In addition, as a thank you for being a loyal SBC Yahoo! user, the remainder of your current Extra Storage billing cycle will be free. You will receive a pro-rated refund from Yahoo! for any time remaining in your current billing cycle. The refund will be credited to the credit card you first used to sign up for your Extra Storage subscription. Your account will be credited within 30 days. The refund should appear on your credit card statement within the next 1-2 billing cycles.

    At the end of your current billing cycle (that is, the anniversary of the date you first signed up for Extra Storage), and again each year after that, unless you tell us to cancel, your 2GB extra storage subscription will automatically renew for another year at the then-current price for new subscribers (currently $9.99 a year). All fees are charged in U.S. dollars. You will receive notice and further instructions via email near the end of your billing cycle.

  159. Yahoo Subscriber email service is now 2GB by nuthatch7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've also removed all ads, etc. But access seems REALLY slow. Probably everyone logging in at once to check it out...

  160. Attachment limit by garfield1979 · · Score: 1

    Has Yahoo increased their attachment limit too ? or is it still the old 3mb ?

  161. This is absolutely true. by raehl · · Score: 1

    I've been sitting at 99% usage of my 100 MB for a fewmonths now (and thus having to delete stuff), and itching for the chance to switch to G-Mail.

    Now I won't. $40/year for an email addy is chump change.

    The only thing that might make me switch is if I hear that searching through your mail is considerably faster on GMail - my one major pet peeve with Yahoo mail (although it's been getting better) is the speed (orlack thereof) when searching for old messages, even just looking in the headers.

    1. Re:This is absolutely true. by keg · · Score: 1

      Hardly consider $40/year chump change when there's a free option out there.

    2. Re:This is absolutely true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That $40/year he was paying has now dropped to $20/year, for the 2GB option with all the Yahoo Mail Plus features.

      Or if he was content with 100 MB AND didn't use the Plus features (like POP3 and zipped mbox download), his account will then be free after canceling Plus.

      Gmail isn't here for most people NOW. People who would use it are being given good alternatives NOW. And I'll probably be sticking with Yahoo Mail Plus @ $20/year long after GMail has been introduced and established, unless Google can impress the hell out of me into using their free service. What Yahoo's done today is SERIOUSLY appreciated.

    3. Re:This is absolutely true. by keg · · Score: 1

      Give me a break... what yahoo's done today. The only thing they're trying to do is compete with Google. Doesn't it bother you that yahoo could have done this years ago but didn't since there wasn't anyone else doing it?

  162. Re:Look at what else you get for $20 ($0 w/ SBC DS by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    My entire yahoo account is a disposable address. Starts getting filled up switch to one of the other accounts that I have on yahoo or hotmail. No need to link, just stop checking. I could care less if I use up yahoo email space.

  163. Cool! More room for pics of naked chicks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    For real. I use Yahoo mail for my fake online identity. The identity is for hooking up online with chicks for bondage, spanking, and other activities that, if publicly known, could wreak havoc in my career.

    Of course, some of the chicks send me pictures of their tits and other privates. With a two meg limit, I generally had to download the pictures and store them encrypted on my computer at work. Now I have a little more wiggle room, so to speak.

  164. Re:Effective Now by OldBus · · Score: 1

    I noticed that! I can understand that normally mail appearing to come from your email is spam, but when you compose it using their own editor surely they can figure out it might be real.

  165. .mac by sonatinas · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to see what new features .mac will do to keep their user base at this point. It seems they are slowly rolling out new features nobody cares about like more icards, but if they double my homepage space i would be happy.

  166. New interface... by mritunjai · · Score: 1

    Personally for me, the more important thing was that the menus (DHTML drop down menus) now actually work with Opera!

    Thank you Yahoo!

    PS: For the record, on the other side of world, Yahoo messenger is as ubiquitous as AIM is in US. That means, virtually everybody who "chats" with friends has a Yahoo account. That means a *lot*. GMail... well its nice, but its even nicer to keep your existsing mail box and not have to notify everyone your change in address (and worse, miss people's messages!)

    --
    - mritunjai
  167. Binary thinking by unsung · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, everyone, quit with this binary mode of thinking For whatever impact this has on Google, this is *good* news. How many of you will have one google account or yahoo account only?

    Just as Google is a lot more than the search engine, having a Yahoo identity is useful for more than just email.

    In fact, I probably spend more time on Yahoo than on any other site these days
    - Customized news,
    - Finances,
    - Movies,
    - Maps,
    - Groups...
    - some shopping (though I use other services more often.)
    - I'm constantly logged in to Yahoo's IM,
    - sometimes use the Video Conferencing feature.
    - I'll also play Yahoo Games,
    - use calendar features at times.
    - Yahoo's has the best solution for maintaining several identities
    - I use at least one for Work, (As a consultant, I use one identity for each client)
    - one for long term personal,
    - one for short term personal.

    Hell, on a daily basis, I probably use more resources from Yahoo than I do from any other media source including Google and TV.

    100 MB will do it for me. It means that people can send me larger attachments, and I can keep some of them online. I also use YahooPOPs to pull my email onto my personal HD, so I don't anticipate having storage problems. Further, I'll still register for Gmail when it becomes available.

  168. Re:I suspect that the difference between google an by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Create a business account. Enter a disposable account on some side system (not hotmail, MSN, or AOL). Then watch how the spam comes.

    Hotmail, MSN, and AOL all do the same. MSN and AOL will also sell to spammers bandwidth and the use of your client IP to cover what is going on.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  169. Fastmail.fm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I did some research on browser-based Email in January, and I found that www.fastmail.fm is about as good as it gets. It is very fast, and has a very powerful user interface. Check them out.


    Also, for the tinfoil lovers in the audience, there is hushmail which I believe has been discussed here before. MUCH slower than fastmail, but very secure.

  170. Why I still hate yahoo mail by Bronz · · Score: 2, Informative


    I've been using Yahoo! since the 6MB days. When I got my gmail invite, I approached it with an open mind. It reeled me in hook, line and sinker.

    1) It's a clean interface. For the last 2 years I've been using Opera with Yahoo Mail just to apply a custom style sheet so I didn't have to see the horrid ads they put everywhere. Some were nearing seizure inducing. Oh? Yahoo mail cleaned their interface up you tell me? Yes... in response to gmail. That doesn't excuse the fact that without gmail, they thought it was OK to plaster my mail with ads.

    2) Yahoo still has a tagline at the end of every mail. Will gmail? I don't know. But this is about how i still hate yahoo.

    3) It's slow. It's always been slow. you have to reload the whole page to check for new mail. (no, I'm not going to run their messanger to check my mail, thanks). gmail has a nice 2-minute pooling feature.

    4) Why is it so slow? They got rid of the graphical ads. I really thought that was most of the slow.

    5) Slow. Will gmail be slow after beta? I don't know. But this is about how i still hate yahoo.

    1. Re:Why I still hate yahoo mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) Useless spam filters that do no good.

    2. Re:Why I still hate yahoo mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my spam filter works like a champ, maybe youre just a llama

  171. Perhaps not by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    I've got a .com address, and I've still got 6mb... I signed up for mail forwarding and pop access too. They sent me two emails saying "welcome to yahoo plus" ... still only 6mb available. Probably will get the 2gb later today or tomorrow.

    Not that I really care. I never used more than 1% of my 6mb... Because I only use pop mail, and I don't really get that much mail. My linux box is almost always on, so not much mail stays on the server for very long.

    Am I the only one who doesn't need massive amounts of storage space on the web? I just want pop access.

    I wish they would start offering pop access for a much smaller fee, perhaps $5.00 a year or something... I only want the 6mb, I don't care about the 2gb.

    I don't like having service forced upon me. Why can't they just keep the service separate?

    Well, anyway, I am starting to like web based email via gmail (I still really, really hate yahoos interface), so maybe I'll just abandon yahoo completely.

  172. Great, but now email isn't working at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I never had space problems but now I can't even get my email on yahoo. Guess their servers are being overwhelmed with people checking it out.

    Thanks yahoo.

    It wouldn't be a problem normally, but I had an email about an interview in it I needed to check. Had to call the contact without knowing his name. Never quite heard it when I talked to him before, and naturally it was not a simply name like Bob, Jim, Jack, or Phil.

    1. Re:Great, but now email isn't working at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to be. "Damn you for giving me free stuff"

      Has linux completely rotted your brain?

    2. Re:Great, but now email isn't working at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same problem here. Very, very difficult to get Yahoo mail to load up and when it does, half the time I can't send or have to re-send 3x to get it to go through.

      Great idea Yahoo, but awful execution.

    3. Re:Great, but now email isn't working at all by mjc_w · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but, imho, the new mail interface sucks. I use Mozilla, and I cannot use the keyboard for selecting "unread" mail and which folder I want to store mail into.

      I have sent a message to Yahoo help requesting the ability to change to the old interface.

      --
      This is the Constitution.This is the Constitution under the Bush administration. Any questions?
    4. Re:Great, but now email isn't working at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't delete stuff or even reply to messages now.

    5. Re:Great, but now email isn't working at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My email was working just fine up until I received the upgrade notification, as soon as I'd read the ugrade message and continued onto my inbox I received a page of symbols. Since Tuesday I've hardly managed to get into the mail service at all, and on the rare occassion that I have been able to read the odd message I am then unable to delete it or move it to a folder, in fact nothing seems to be working on it, since yesterday afternoon I've had no luck at all.
      It's great that they are upgrading the storage space, but as usual these things never seem to be planned all that well and it never works instantly. It'd be nice if Yahoo put up a message page when you tried to sign in, letting people know of the problems and keeping them updated instead of leaving them to find out what's going on elsewhere!

  173. The email from Yahoo! by timlee · · Score: 1

    Notice: Change of service to your Yahoo! Mail account

    Dear Yahoo! Mail User,

    Thanks for using Yahoo! Mail. It's our goal to offer you an email experience that makes it easy and enjoyable to stay in touch. Periodically, we make service changes to enhance that experience for our users. As of June 15, 2004, you'll enjoy the following benefits:
    Increased storage capacity - from your current level to 100MB
    Increase in total message size to 10MB
    A streamlined interface that's even easier to use
    You will continue to access your Yahoo! Mail account as usual. No further action is required, and there will be no interruption of your service.

    We hope you enjoy the new features and benefits. If you have any questions, please visit our Help page. Thanks again for using Yahoo! Mail.

    Sincerely,
    The Yahoo! Mail Team

  174. I just realized.. by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    You guys are talking about free pop access. Is that just in the uk? Doh!

    I've been posting -1 Informative posts a lot recently. If I can get free pop access, then I'll just cancel my mail plus! and stick with the free offering. I wasn't aware they offered free pop access though...

    1. Re:I just realized.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo Pops. Search for it on Sourceforge.net. It's an intermediate layer program that lets you use POP access through the web interface of the free Yahoo account.

    2. Re:I just realized.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I feel like a dummy for paying $20 a year...

  175. SpamGuard not that good by extra88 · · Score: 1

    I've had a mail.yahoo.com for a long time but I haven't really used it for a long time because A) I don't really need it and B) there is a ton of spam. I hadn't checked it since late March and just logged in to see my new quota. Boy, good thing they increased it because with a 100MB quota I'm only 3001% over. I have a few mail rules to move messages into a "suspect mail" folder (including if my address is not on the To: line) and there are 50,608 messages in there taking up 3,071,003k. I haven't even looked but if there's more than 2 legitimate messages out of the 67 in the Inbox, I'll be surprised. I think the account gets a disproportionate amount of spam because it has a very generic dictionary word for a name and people use it as a fake address.

    The Bulk folder is empty even though SpamGuard is set to keep them for a month but that may be because my account has been disabled for being over quota. In the past I'd say SpamGuard got no more than 30% of the spam I receive.

    The best part? You can't delete folders with messages in them! You can check a box to delete all the messages on the screen but the screen can't be set to display more than 200 messages at a time.

  176. IMAP hosting by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    figured this article was as good a place as any to ask fellow slashdotters for their advice on picking an IMAP mail host. basically all I want is the ability to point my own DNS entries to use them as a mail exchange for my domain (even though there's only 1 e-mail account to be hosted).

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  177. Use Cheap hosting by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 1

    $19.99 for a 2 gig mailbox? I've got a shared hosting account with 10Gbs disk space for cheaper than that. I get my own domain, spam control (my own choice), and NO ADs. I'd hope it's a one-time 20 bucks, non-recurring...

  178. The premium product is searchable by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Informative

    The 2GB option for paying users features search.

    1. Re:The premium product is searchable by ponds · · Score: 1

      Yes but how do you think it compares to googles search? Seriously?

  179. Access to info by scrod98 · · Score: 1

    This is a great feature, If you can get to it...

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
  180. What happens with Yahoo!? by Smoje · · Score: 0
    I see today that now I have 100 megabytes instead of 6, but also, the interface has changed and the webmail don't work correctly!!

    I can't delete e-mails, can't mark all e-mails to delete or readed!!

    I hope in the next days they solve all the problems, but 100 megabytes is fine for me, I read this account all days

  181. Just got it... by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    Just a side note, after this previous post I finally got the 2gb account...

    Gah, the webmail interface for yahoo mail plus isn't much of an improvement.

    Oh well, I don't look at it very often, so no big deal.

    I'm kind of surprised there are so many ads there. Gmail's ads are definitely less intrusive. Hopefully that won't change.

    1. Re:Just got it... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Gmail's ads are definitely less intrusive. Hopefully that won't change.
      I hope it does change, but by Yahoo!'s becoming less intrusive, rather than Gmail's becoming more so : )
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  182. Free gmail account, invite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I appear to have an excess of gmail invitations. First 3 that want one, get one - jb@users.pc9.org

  183. Yeah by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have 6-7 Yahoo accounts (use them as spam collectors, just give them away when annoying sites require an email address). Two of them I've had for a couple of years now, and they're at 6 MB. The rest of them (which were opened up within 1-3 years from now) are at 4 MB.

    1. Re:Yeah by Strenoth · · Score: 1

      And I have a friend in sweeden whose yahoo site ends in .se (even trying to log into .com redirects her to .se) and she says it hasn't migrated over yet.

      --

      "It takes a very long time to count to 2 in binary." ~'Fourlegged'

  184. message from msn hotmail by AshuBhai · · Score: 1

    Don't let your MSN Hotmail account freeze up! As a valued customer, we want to remind you that if your e-mail account goes over the 2MB storage limit, it will be automatically frozen. That means: You won't be able to send any e-mail messages All messages sent to you will bounce back without notification* Your e-mail account will stay frozen until you delete enough messages to put your account under the 2MB limit. So make sure to monitor your account and delete messages regularly in order to stay well under the limit. To avoid this hassle, sign up for MSN® Hotmail® Extra Storage. Starting at just $19.95** a year, Extra Storage gives you a much larger inbox. It's the easiest way to avoid a frozen account.

    1. Re:message from msn hotmail by n0dez · · Score: 1

      Wow, for just $19.95/year you get a 10 MB inbox.

    2. Re:message from msn hotmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and 59.95$ only for 100MB.
      http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/e s2&xAPID=1980&DI=7474&HL=Hotmail_908PIM_Demo&S T=1

  185. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its not illegal, you just agreed not to run one when you agreed to the TOS. there are no laws about running mail servers on residential internet lines.

  186. comment has been made twice. stop karma whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=111126&cid=942 8562

    and

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=111126&cid=9 42 8624

  187. I have 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had my rocketmail transferred to yahoo when they bought it. First I had 4 megs, then a few years ago I had 6. Who has only 4?

  188. dont post the same message twice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop it you filthy whore.

  189. Functionality Broken in Firebird by Corrado · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... the new interface seems to resist pushing buttons from Firefox 0.8. Whenever I try to delete a message by pushing the "Delete" button at the top of the page it just sits there. Actually, none of the buttons work except the "Spam" button. And they don't graphically depress anymore. Actually, it kinda sucks - I dont really know if I pushed the button or not as it doesn't respond to clicks.

    I confirmed this on both Linux and WinXP. Is anyone else having this trouble? Where do you report these kinds of issues to who (webmaster@yahoo.com?)?

    Otherwise, I think it's great! Maybe they decided that I didn't really need to delete my messages since I now have so much space. :)

    --
    KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    1. Re:Functionality Broken in Firebird by B5Fan · · Score: 1

      It's broken for me too, using IE on XP.

      --
      Borg:"Lawsuits are irrelevant. GPL3 is irrelevant. DRM is good. We understand security... Alert! MS are assimilating us!
  190. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by adzoox · · Score: 1

    Say this again - are you saying you didn't agree to the terms of service therefore you are immune?

    Most if not ALL broadband ISPs strictly prohibit servers - whether mail or DNS or FTP - without a business account. How are you claiming that you getting around that?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  191. Re:I suspect that the difference between google an by hopemafia · · Score: 1

    Ummmmm....no?

    Obviously your reading comprehension is not so good. If you had read my post you would see that I get virtually no spam sent to my yahoo account. I think if yahoo was selling my info to spammers, I would be getting spam. I'm not quite sure what you're talking about with business accounts...I don't think yahoo makes any distinction between business and personal accounts.

    I know hotmail accounts are plagued by spam (used to have one before switching to yahoo). MSN and AOL are different animals (being ISP's not webmail services), but I've never used either of them so I can't comment on their practices.

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  192. Other Problems by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    I got bit by this one.

    I apparently was 2GB over my MINUS 2GB limit.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  193. Spam doesnt count.... by bigkahunafish · · Score: 1

    Yahoo has about the best spam filter out there for a free service... and since spam gets sent to a special "bulk" folder, it doesnt count toward your quota...neither does "trashed" messages... its ok, you get that 100 megs all to yourself for free....

    --
    Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
  194. New and improved? by CFrankBernard · · Score: 1

    I just signed into my account and read the announcement about the new and improved Yahoo and when I clicked on the button centered below the message to go to my account ( http://us.f211.mail.yahoo.com/ym/trap?upgrade=Cont inue+to+Yahoo%21+Mail ) I received a new and improved error: "The requested URL /ym/trap was not found on this server."

  195. Yahoo improves? by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    Umm, I have a Yahoo email account and ... yea I gots more space but I still don't have any options if my account is hacked.

    No "abuse" help and certainly no explaination or guidance in the help files. Typical Corporate inhumanity.

  196. Editing a live system? by shish · · Score: 1
    I logged in to my account this morning, to get a web page saying that I'd had some upgrades, I clicked continue, and it was all the same. Hit "refresh", and I got a new UI, but still 6MB limit. Hit "refresh" again, And the old UI with 100MB limit, hit "refresh", got new UI and 100MB limit, but all the images are broken. Also, add in some random name resolution errors (Blama akamai...)

    Checking again this afternoon, things seem to have stabilised, and it's all quite nice :)

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  197. The nice thing about GMail... by hkb · · Score: 1

    is yes of course, the 1 GB of email storage. I guess that's not a big deal, because I technically have about 160GB free for email storage on my server.

    But, the real cool thing about GMail is its interface: labels and speed.

    Labels? Well, they're awesome, and I find myself wanting them when I'm in Squirrelmail or Kerio Webmail now. They're kind of just like folders, except that you can apply multiple labels to one copy of a message. Great feature, you probably wouldn't see the big deal until you started using them.

    Speed? It appears that the GMail interface is largely a Javascript app, so a lot of it "runs" on the local machine. This means using it is extremely quick, because you're not generating constant HTTP traffic.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  198. 2GB As of Today for SBC Subs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just logged in to my mail (I'm an SBC DSL customer) and all (at least primary) SBC DSL accounts were immediately upgraded to 2GB storage.

    Cool Beans...

  199. "amazing interface"..."minimalism"...really? by adulttoys · · Score: 1

    I have been totally unimpressed with Gmail's interface so far. Sure, it's fast once the initial page loads (which takes forever), but only if you have a fast computer that can handle the tons of javascript it requires. The browser requirements are also a little absurd for email, mostly because of all the javascript.

    The search is nice, and labeling is a cool idea, but I hate the threading. I rarely need to keep track of entire conversations (quoting relevant parts of them in the actual email does the job better) and Gmail routinely identifies multiple emails as part of a conversation when they are not.

    Yahoo, on the other hand, is stable, does not require a lot of javascript (it uses it, but still has functionality with earlier browsers), and doesn't try so hard to collect personal information on me. The paying version of Yahoo is great, too, supporting things that Gmail is missing, like choosing from multiple From addresses when sending an email, and POP access. And if you ask me, $20 a year is not so much. Plus, with the new changes today, there's even more storage than Google and no banner ads.

    I really don't see how Gmail is "incredible" or "revolutionary".

    --

    ---
    Adult Toys
  200. Yahoo Mail was superior even with 6mb... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    Because, quite frankly, Google's "Conversation" interface is unintuitive and clumsy. Or am I the only one that feels that way? I'm a GMail tester, and though I like the size of storage I decisively dislike how all the messages are kept in "conversation blocks". I thought I'd get used to it, but I'm definately not getting used to it. I think with E-Mail comes certain presentation expectations, and like an ideology they're hard to break... at least for me.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  201. MSN to follow suit? by livhan28 · · Score: 1

    given this new trend, anyone think thers a chance of msn/hotmail boosting my spam catcher account?

  202. Uh, this comment exists TWICE in the same thread by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quit modding it. :P

  203. Interface screwed in Mozilla? by IrishMist · · Score: 1

    I just logged in all excited like and the interface looks like doggy-doo, if you can imagine doggy-doo with some kind of narrow blue horizontal stripes all over it. Also it looks like the stylesheet is completely missing. This is using a late-model Mozilla. Back to gmail I s'pose ;-).

    1. Re:Interface screwed in Mozilla? by Regenpak · · Score: 1

      Bleh... got the same on and off with Mozilla 1.5 on my RH8.0 box. I thought it was my Privoxy webfilter but disabling that didn't help. Also it is s-l-o-o-o-o-w-w-w-w beyond belief! My Windoze PoS (IE) performs marginally better, but at least I didn't get the stripes. Another great example of going live without proper testing!

  204. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm probably because they have an extremely large number of servers and serve millions of customers so they roll out in waves because a) it's not practical to roll out to every server at once anyway and b) they want to detect problems as they roll out and fix them before everybody is screwed. Clearly you've never worked with real software in the real world.

  205. Yahoo Mail, now less compatible! by mblase · · Score: 1

    I'm logging into my upgraded account for the first time using OS X Safari. Looks more or less the same, but lots of the text has these dark blue lines behind it (instead of solid shading) which I can't read over very well. Plus the form buttons and combo boxes no longer respond to my mouse clicks at all.

    So sure, 100MB is great for nothing, but their redesign has rendered my favorite browser completely useless for reading my mail. Nice user testing, Yahoo.

  206. Re:aah, yahoo is /.'d! by Sprite+Remix · · Score: 0
    Ever heard of changes in a server? In other words... you probably haven't.

    (Ironically, coming from an Ex-Troll.) The key to thinking is COMMON SENSE.

  207. no Firefox support - cookies by bach37 · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for Yahoo to accept that Mozilla and Firefox are acceptable secure browsers.

  208. Mmm, Calendar. by rsadelle · · Score: 1

    I don't use my Yahoo! e-mail for much (some site registrations, mostly), but I do use the calendar. I love that I can put in an event--I mostly use it for birthdays, weddings, graduations, etc.--and have it e-mail me reminders at the e-mail address I do check all the time at times I designate. For example, I have birthdays set to send me reminders one week and one day in advance. That way if I've spaced it out, I have enough time between the reminder and the birthday to buy a gift and put it in the mail and I have that last minute reminder so that if I also want to send an e-card or an e-mail on the actual day, I'll remember it.

  209. ..but it is not Opera friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new Yahoo Mail page looks like hell with
    my Opera 7.23 browser. The fonts are smaller and do not line up correctly with the icons in the folders column on the left.

  210. Re:I suspect that the difference between google an by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create a business account. Enter a disposable account on some side system

    The business account is set up for a company with multiple accounts under it. You must enter a personal account for each of those. So if business account abc.com is registered, then you would set up mutiple email addresses under it (such xyz@abc.com). When creating these, the parent poster is suggesting that you register with none major isp's e-mail.

    I think that it is safe to assume that Yahoo, AOL, and MSN will not be sending spam directly against their own accounts, but against accounts on other systems. IOW,they are using their customers input to harvest e-mail accounts from other systems.

    Obviously your reading comprehension is not so good.Hummmmm. A lack of knowledge on your part and/or your own inability to read is to be construed as a lack of reading on the parent's part? Or perhaps you prefer to troll?

  211. no stories about the terrible mozilla support? by 2057 · · Score: 1

    no stories about the terrible mozilla support? Its horrible that i cannot read my email anymore from my favorite source....cries heavily

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
    1. Re:no stories about the terrible mozilla support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What are you talking about? Yahoo! Mail looks fine in Mozilla...well, except for that godawful striped background which keeps appearing and disappearing.


      Looks like they are trying three or four different looks; only one is a problem in Mozilla.

  212. I'm sure glad I didn't fall for it by 33nine3 · · Score: 1

    For the last two months, Yahoo had been displaying a message over my inbox advising me to pay for more storage. Now, they're giving me the storage they were asking me to pay for just yesterday.

    It makes me wonder, if I had decided to pay for the 100mb of mail storage space yesterday, would they have offered me a refund today?

  213. That's the spirit of slashdot for sure by melted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw a company that provides you with world-class service for free. Now that would be fair, right?

  214. This is how storage space claim will be rendered by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    irrelevant. No one really needs more than 100M of email space. Now they will have to compete on convenience, features, etc. They (they being Google) are still in a strong position, but not as strong as before. If I were to choose between email providers I'd use the one that has POP3 (or IMAP) available and better spam filtering.

    I actually thing Google screwed themselves by announcing this service too early in the game. If they announced a full blown, stable version they'd have a GIANT market lead.

  215. Get 1 Gig Free Now by stecoop · · Score: 1

    Get you 1gig free now at SpyMac. No invites necessary.

  216. CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    coupled with some of the best spam-filtering available

    Hmm. I'm looking to transfer my web mail from Yahoo to Gmail now, because Yahoo Spam filters fail too much.

    I'm on a couple dozen mailing lists, and *every* mailinglist that I am on has ended up in the Bulk folder, including mailing lists that I manage, email from CERT and even some email from Yahoo's Paydirect (I checked and it was a legitimate email).

    For the last 2 weeks a bunch of Spam containing unobfuscated words like "Viagra" and "Teen Sex" made it past the Spam filters, yet an email from CERT was in my Bulk folder.

    Granted, I've had my Yahoo account for about 7 years and I get alot of spam. But the number of false positives is pretty amazing. Every day I probably receive 5 legit emails and 150 messages in my bulk folder. Usually 3-5 spam messages are missed by the Spam filters, and 1-2 legit emails are tagged as Spam.

    I've clicked the "Not Spam" button for each of these mailinglists, but I rarely notice any improvement (probably because there are a hundred other recipients who don't tag the email as "Not Spam").

    The only solution was to add the dozens of "From:" address for each of the mailinglists to my addressbook.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      mailinglist that I am on has ended up in the Bulk folder

      Uh mailing lists *are* bulk mail. Otherwise they would call it the "Spam" folder.

    2. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

      Your paydirect email went to your bulk. Let me guess: you have a qmail/postfix account somewhere forwarding to your yahoo.com account, yeah?

    3. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

      exactly.

    4. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Not for this account. No.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    5. Re:CERT marked as spam. "Viagra" makes it through. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      You're being too literal.

      The Bulk folder is where SpamGuard puts unsolicited bulk mail. Solicited bulk mail is not supposed to end up in the Bulk folder. When it does go there, it's a mistake.

      Otherwise, how is one supposed to distinquish between Spam and legitimate bulk email?

      True, Yahoo should call it the "Spam" folder, but they don't.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  217. But now Yahoo can't export Contacts as VCards by dickens · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago they removed the ability to export from the address book as VCards. Without any warning or explanation.

    It was pretty cool too. I found this feature and banged in about a hundred contacts on the old OS-9 iMac at work that has no decent contact manager. Now I can't export these contacts in VCF format, which pissed me off quite a bit.

    I can't even find a a way to complain about it !

    Does any know off hand if gmail can export contacts as VCards ? (and if the contact manager is any good yet)

  218. OT but oh well... by nm42 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hell, if anyone knows an easy way to get email out of GroupWise's archive and into Outlook .pst format, I'd be indebted!

    Check out Nexic's Personal Publisher. It doesn't give you a PST file, but it does archive your email.

    Or if you really want a PST, open your GW mailbox with outlook as a front-end(assuming you are on a live system, and not just POP3).

  219. Invitation to spammers' dictionary attacks by Jadrano · · Score: 1

    Look, the reason I'm gonna go with Google for my free webmail is that I actually have a chance of getting something decent as my name, instead of some misspelled-word+four-digit-number...

    "Decent" e-mail addresses will probably soon be gone with G-mail. Furthermore, I don't think it is a good idea to have a decent e-mail address at a very common domain - that's an invitation for spammers using dictionary attacks (of course, it can be expected that GMail will have good filters, but it is much better if your address doesn't end up on spammers' lists, at all). I think it is much better to use decent e-mail addresses at less common domains (there are quite good smaller e-mail providers, and some offer choosing one of several domains) or - even better - to have your own domain, it's not that expensive any more.

    I intend using GMail when it becomes available, but I'll just forward my mails to it so that they are easily accessible and retrieveable from any computer with web access, but I'm going to use a strange cryptic e-mail address I won't tell anyone.

  220. Negative storage space by sesquipedalian_one · · Score: 1

    My Yahoo mail box was upgraded last night--cough. To -2048.0MB (sic). I then got a message telling me that my account had been suspended because I was way over my limit, having a whopping 0.0MB of mail stored. I'm meditating on the metaphysics of negative storage space. Does this mean that I have to host their data?

  221. Yahoo Support by solprovider · · Score: 1

    Please, please retrace your steps and post the URL for Yahoo Support here.

    Last year, my father spent 3 weeks searching their website and calling every phone number he found. He finally reached someone in California that told him that Yahoo has no interest in supporting their subscribers.

    His issue was the lost functionality when using Mozilla rather than MSIE for RichText. He really likes sending HTML emails, although I convinced him not to send them to me. I still get them when he sends to the whole family.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    1. Re:Yahoo Support by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Informative
      Does this help?
      1. Go to http://www.yahoo.com/.
      2. Click on "Help".
      3. Click on "Mail" under "Help by Feature or Service".
      4. Click on "How do I contact Yahoo! Mail Customer Care?" under "Contacting Yahoo! Mail Customer Care".
      5. Press the "No" button beside "Click No to contact Yahoo! Customer Care.".
      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:Yahoo Support by Atario · · Score: 1

      6. Write detailed, helpful, polite message asking for help

      7. Get back cut-n-pasted response based on first keyword match in your text

      8. Make mental note never to bother asking Yahoo! for help again

      I love Yahoo!, but they gotta shape up in this department.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    3. Re:Yahoo Support by solprovider · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much. I will tell my father so he can complain about Yahoo not having full fuctionality for Mozilla users.

      There was no Help on the homepage. (I even checked with Mozilla search.) I found the Help link at the top of the mail homepage: http://mail.yahoo.com

      ---
      I tried using the Help Search with "Mozilla" and "Using Mozilla" and received:
      We think you may have asked about a Yahoo! ID. Please try your search at one of the following:
      * Yahoo! Search
      * Yahoo! Member Directory

      As far as Yahoo knows, Mozilla is just one of their members. (Wonder who?) "Using Mozilla with Yahoo Mail" did not return anything useful.

      I tried to create an account with the name "Mozilla". The "Are you really human?" graphic did not show because it is from a different server.

      ---
      SIG: Currently over two years without mod points.
      Could I give you some mod points? They are rather painful, since browsers (I checked Mozilla, MSIE, and Opera) choke on all those pull-downs, so I have to be careful to open only one article, and it cannot have over 300 posts. I have not had 48 hours without points since OCT. I let 14 points expire last week (meaning I only modded 6 posts.) (No, I will not turn them off. The moderation system keeps this site healthy.)

      --
      I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    4. Re:Yahoo Support by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is. The link is at the top right corner.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  222. About Time! by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't for competition, Yahoo would continue to descend into suckdom. Maybe, hopefully, they'll do away with the ripoff that is their $300 annual fee for being considered for listing in their directory. Ridiculously greedy.

    BTW, Yahoo's mail servers appear to be slashdotted??

    "Net Timeout Error

    The operation timed out when attempting to contact us.f529.mail.yahoo.com.

    The browser timed out while trying to connect to the specified site. The site may be experiencing high loads that are slowing it down, or network problems are preventing data from being received from it in a timely manner. If the site is likely to be busy, consider waiting a few moments before retrying the request."

    (Weird - try cut and pasting error messages from Firefox. You get a bunch of different messages.)

  223. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just more room for more spam....

  224. Re: Yahoo spam filtering by hal9000 · · Score: 1

    Yahoo's spam filtering actually sucks. It's constantly putting newsletters and such in the Bulk Mail folder. You'd think they'd have some sort of Bayesian learning function connected to the "This is not spam" button. Evidently not.

    --
    Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  225. Re:This is how storage space claim will be rendere by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with you. And here's some relevant ramblings.

    I don't know if you've actually tried Yahoo's Plus service, but I have it and it rocks. Besides the 2GB storage space, I *DO* have POP access to my Yahoo mail account. Couple that with Yahoo's near perfect spam filtering (I see maybe 2 or 3 spam a day out of about 500 I receive every day), and it's really a helluva service.

    Besides email Yahoo also gives me a personal home page that is VERY configurable, a nice address book with import/export capabilities, a personal calendar, a personal file area (briefcase), etc. Does Google provide all that? I doubt it. On top of that, they would have to provide a better version of all that in order for people like me to care.

    There currently ARE some response time issues with Yahoo mail, but those may be related to the Akamai issues noted on today's /. front page. Either way, once those issues are cleared up, I'll have an email account that I wouldn't trade for a free gMail account. Yahoo has been in this game much longer and they know what they're doing. I've never lost data with them. My understanding of Google's idea of "redundancy" is to throw 100 cheap PCs at the problem and hope nothing gets lost. I love their search engine, but that's not exactly an awe inspiring model for retaining personal data.

    We'll see how it all pans out. But for now, Yahoo gets actual money from me and Google does not.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  226. GMAIL FOR MOZILLA / THUNDERBIRD by standing_still · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of a tool for Mozilla or Thunderbird that I can check a gmail account without using a browser.

    I'm currently using YahooPops to check my Yahoo Account, but if their was a tool for Gmail I would convert in a sec.

    Thanks,

    bl

    1. Re:GMAIL FOR MOZILLA / THUNDERBIRD by Shachaf · · Score: 0

      If you're running Windows, you can use "POP goes the GMail" -- get it at http://jaybe.org/pgtgm/.

  227. What about Yahoo Briefcase? by stecoop · · Score: 1

    Great my email account has been upgraded to 100mb but I would rather have my briefacse.yahoo.com expanded. Its currently at 30mb - will this also get to be 100mb?

  228. Yahoo HTML Mail by solprovider · · Score: 1

    MSIE has a link "Plain | Color and Graphics" next to the title "Compose". It defaulted to Plain, but showed the RichText icons after clicking "Color and Graphics". I could not find an Option to make that choice permanent. (If Yahoo is technologically competent, they may default it to your last choice. I did not test.)

    Mozilla had the ability to send HTML emails from Yahoo. It was missing some of the functionality available in MSIE. Today, there is no option to send HTML email.

    If Yahoo was technologically competent, they would have writtten the functionality to the standards so all browsers could use it. Instead, they wrote a crippled version for non-MSIE users. That was almost understandable when MSIE had over 90% of the browser users. Now that MSIE usage has declined, and the rate of the decline is increasing, they completely remove the functionality.

    Shall we start some conspiracy theories about how Yahoo wants to encourage use of Microsoft products? That seems unlikely unless they are hoping MS will buy them, which also seems unlikely in today's merger-resistant world.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  229. eWeek quotes Anonymous Coward by Laptop+Dancer · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to eWeek, some Slashdot user named "Anonymous Coward" said that Yahoo "..e-mail isn't working at all".

    That Anonymous Coward guy posts a lot of stuff!

    1. Re:eWeek quotes Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's as disturbing as it is funny. If a publication is willing to quote anonymous people -- not just those to whom they're granting anonymity, but those who are completely unknown to the publication -- what credibility can that publication have? Yes, the problem apparently started with article author Lisa Vaas, but an editor should have picked up on it before it was published. That comment could have come from a competitor of Yahoo! and could have been a complete falsehood intended to damage Yahoo! -- and by publishing it, eWeek extends the damage. Agh, what irresponsibility! :-(

  230. Oh Great! by RobertKozak · · Score: 1

    Now I'll have around 50x more spam!

    --
    Bet this .sig looks familiar.
  231. Not a lot of space... really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, people. NEVER delete E-Mail? If I never deleted E-Mail, I'd end up with tens of gigabytes of E-Mail, within just a few years. Afterall, I subscribe to mailing lists, and many of them are high volume. That would just be redundant since they're already archived in many places anyway.

  232. /. effect by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

    I have been using Yahoo! mail for a while now and it's been fairly OK.

    Them removeing the free POP service was kinda annoying but whatever. You get what you pay for.

    However, thanks to their latest move and now the /. effect trying to use Yahoo! mail today is just horrable! I made the mistake today of making an online order and putting my Yahoo! mail addy in the form and upon trying to go there have been getting nothing but network errors from Opera. (As a side note, the main interface looks like ass in Opera right now, which is not cool.)

    Thanks again /.! Heh.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  233. It must be me.... by the_real_se7en_,' · · Score: 3, Funny

    Figures... Last night i had to clean out 2 of my 4 yahoo emails because they were both over 90% full. And if I would of waited till today I could of left them all there. Damned my luck to hell!

  234. Wow! What a deal! by NattyDread · · Score: 1

    2GB of Spam for only $19.99 ... a sampling of 100M available 'free' (as in beer).

    Natty

    --
    Maybe the rain Isn't really to blame. So I'll remove the cause, But not the symptom!
  235. yahoo doesn't get it by zorander · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't used yahoo's mail in a few years, but as I remember the interface was clunky, slow, and painful, and there were adds above and/or below.

    Regardless of the space they give you, that's probel number one. GMail has a very slick interface. It's as responsive as a web based user interface as any of the standalone mail programs I have used, which is very impressive. From what I hear, there is an 80kb .js file that is cached locally and after that everything is very very quick.

    There isn't any difference between one gigabyte and one hundred megabytes to 99.9% of the people out there who could fit their mail in a few megs easily. It's really only power-users/mailing list subscribers who'll even approach one hundred. Heck, at my school I'm capped at $150 and after a year of deleting nothing I'm only at 30%. I'm a member of python-dev and wxpython-users which are both moderately trafficked groups and used to belong to python-users which is a very high traffic group. All these messages (thousands) are still around. It would take me a lot of time to fill that 150M, much less a gigabyte.

    In any case, Yahoo should follow google's lead in the ad policies/user interface, rather than raw space. You could offer a terabyte and no one would even approach it, *it doesn't matter* If you're using a gig on gmail right now, chances are you are either being gratuitously inefficient or somehow abusing the system (using it for backup or something). There's just no way.

    Brian

    1. Re:yahoo doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They have updated the look of the user interface also.

      One annoyance: I can't send out HTML email from Yahoo any more; only ugly text email.

    2. Re:yahoo doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I second that. I wish Yahoo would allow HTML email again; I can write up a CGI-BIN to send out HTML should push come to shove and Yahoo decides that people just shouldn't send out HTML mail, but this has two disadvantages:
      • It means I have to spend about an hour writing up the CGI and testing it (there is some overlap because I have already written a simple blogger)
      • Email sent from such a CGI is more likely to be labelled "spam" because it will be a Yahoo! email sent from a non-Yahoo server.
    3. Re:yahoo doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow...

      u wrote a simple blogger? and can write a CGI-BIN to send email? do0d, u r the king of coding godz...

      i wrote a CGI perl script once but that can never compare to you writing a CGI-BIN... i bow to you...

    4. Re:yahoo doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't send out HTML email from Yahoo any more; only ugly text email.

      OMG, that really sucks, that must be highly annoying to losers who don't use Outlook Express and enjoyed looking at your HTML code in their text-only-by-preference email client.

  236. Storage comes second -- boolean search rocks! by SnakeStu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been awhile since I had a Yahoo! account, but what I remember of it was pretty much like every other Web-based email system -- every other, except Gmail. Sure, sure, the storage space is nice, but that's just a component of what really makes Gmail useful: Full-featured search capability.

    Here's an example, from which you can extrapolate your own interests (coding, or recipes, or political commentary, etc., instead of models). As a photographer, I like to be kept informed about new models in my area who have signed up with OneModelPlace.com. So, I have signed up with that site to get automated notifications, which now go to my Gmail account. When I get a notification, I decide -- by looking at the model's portfolio -- whether it's a "keeper" or not. If not, I delete it, because I don't want it coming up in my searches later. If it's a keeper, I tack on a "Interesting Models" label and archive the message. That's where the big storage helps.

    Then, when I want to find a model that meets certain criteria, I can do a search in my Gmail account. For example, I could do a search for "nude AND edmonds" if I wanted to find a model in Edmonds, WA who is available for nude work. This is better than doing a search on OMP directly, because I know the model's portfolio isn't "stale" (since some "models" on OMP are no longer modeling), and I've already culled out those models I probably wouldn't be interested in working with (for whatever reason -- cost, looks, etc.), so my results in my Gmail search are prequalified.

    Other features of Gmail are nice, but not necessarily unique. For example, Opera's email client allows the use of labels (although I haven't used that client enough to know if they work as well as Gmail's label feature). Other features are underpowered or missing -- if you're looking for a Web-based email address that has lots of integration gimmicks, then Gmail doesn't cut it, at least not yet. But for raw power for the core purpose of handling email, I'm liking Gmail more and more.

    Obviously, as with any Web-based email, or really any non-encrypted email, there are privacy concerns, but those can be managed. While I probably won't use Gmail for personal mail very often (if ever), I certainly will use it for newsletters and other content that I might want to be able to search in the future.

  237. flabbergasted!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use my email all that much. After having used the default 6MB Yahoo mailbox for over five years, I finally signed up for a 25 MB Yahoo mailbox last year, for $19.99. Now I have a 2GB upgrade. What am I supposed to do with so much space? Trade MP3s? Of course I can leave it free, but Murphy's law creates this tremendous urge to fill all that space with something!

  238. outages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems any outages on yahoo are for the free accounts, my paid accoutn responds quickly but my free one keeps timing out. I guess they're really trying to convince people to pay.

  239. MSN Hotmail future plans... by n0dez · · Score: 1

    If you're using MSN (R) Explorer (R), you would get unlimited space* for storing your email messages, pictures and Word (R) documents(R).

    *Restricted to your hard disk's free space.
    *documents(R) is about to be a registered trademark of Microsoft(R). Microsoft(R) is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved for you to use.

  240. Somebody screwed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't care less about the new yahoo limits...I don't use my yahoo accounts.

    However...starting exactly yesterday, I got my first spam in my yahoo dsl account (I check it occaisionally for announcements, but I have never sent mail from it). I have now gotten a couple more, and it's now clear that somewhere in the change some addresses leaked out.

    Anybody else noticing an uptick in spam?

  241. Gmail EZ to get and will kill all other free email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got my Gmail account pretty easily. My brother's friend sent him an invite. It looks like all new Gmail users get 3 invites to distribute after about 30 minutes after logging into the system. That will make for pretty quick exponential growth of their beta. Ask around Gmail may be coming to you sooner than you think.

    As far as why even 100 MB is not enough, it is because of the amazing ability to categorize email with filters. Every crappy freemail account can be consolidated to gmail and filters applied.

    Rather than just shlepping email into folders, multiple Labels can be applied to each email and searches can be performed on the basis of those Labels. Thusly, a particular email can have pr0n, Rotary Club, top secret and ebay labels all at the same time and still be easily brought up for review.

    Just wish they could do boolean searches on labels. Will have to email that one to the Gmail folks.

  242. Re:I suspect that the difference between google an by hopemafia · · Score: 1

    The ulitmate parent made the statement that yahoo is "selling your info that you register and from your e-mail".

    I can say that yahoo isn't selling my e-mail to spammer (I get very little spam).

    As for them selling the e-mail addresses I send/receive e-mail to/from to spammers, which I believe is implied as well, I can also say that has not happened to me since I also have an e-mail account through my personal website (basically the same thing as the business account you describe), and have sent mail between it and yahoo, and it gets no spam at all. So unless I got lucky and the e-mail harvesting bots missed all those messages, yahoo isn't selling the addresses of those I correspond with.

    My statements all describe my experience with yahoo mail, whereas yours and the parents broadly assume all corporations are evil (except the sacred google). If you have any evidence that yahoo is behaving in such a nefarious manner, I'd like to hear it since I wouldn't want to be burdening my friends with more spam, but until there is evidence please cut out the FUD.

    Finally: "Or perhaps you prefer to troll?" says the AC troll....ahh the hypocrisy!

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  243. Re: Yahoo spam filtering by kpsimm · · Score: 1

    I got so sick of the spam entering my inbox (yes, spamguard on) I created a new Yahoo account. Did not use it. Within 5 minutes I was spammed! It was an unusualy yahoo ident too.

  244. DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL! by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    God damn you slashdot! I don't care about yahoo's upgrade. All I want to do is check my fucking email--but I can't because (presumably) yahoo's email service is being slashdotted.

    Or am I the only one out here being affected?

  245. Composing messages with Mozilla 1.6 on Win2K by pobbard · · Score: 1

    ...does anyone else find the font in the body of the 'Compose' page waaaay too small to read?

    --Phil

    --
    "It's amazing how our industry is strewn with beautiful, dead technology and bitter engineers." --M. Huyck
  246. They Already are offering 2GB Mail Accounts. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    I just logged into my paid account and I'm using 0% of my 2GB Limit.

    Too bad they dont support IMAP I'd really love it then :)

  247. Re: Yahoo spam filtering by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    newsletters and such in the Bulk Mail folder

    Newsletters are bulk mail. I don't know why so many of you don't know that "Bulk Mail Folder" != "Spam Folder".

  248. Well done Yahoo! by bigsimes · · Score: 1

    I am really pleased about this, a nice present from Yahoo this morning. The previous limit wasn't bad if as others mention you transfer text or zipped docs, now it can be more like my USB pen drive.

  249. finger ceo_numero_uno@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % finger ceo_numero_uno@gmail.com
    ceo_numero_uno@gmail.com
    Eric Schmidt
    Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO
    Plan:
    1. Assert control over search engine.
    2. Create slogan: do no evil.
    3. Create wide public base and become search standard.
    4. Obtain identities and all personal information of users.
    5. Modify slogan: do evil.
    6. Enslave users as pod-people, topple all governments, hunt down all non-believers, and convert statue of liberty into large effigy of my left buttocks.

  250. Re: Yahoo spam filtering by hal9000 · · Score: 1

    Let me put it this way: the messages filtered by the Yahoo SpamGuard (not BulkGuard, mind you) -- including bulk, like newsletters -- are called Spam, by Yahoo's system.
    If Bulk folder != Spam folder in Yahoo world, I must be missing something.

    --
    Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  251. Bzzzt! by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Schernau's 2nd Law strikes: by "signing" your post with either your real name or your sig, you invalidate the message in the post by being a dork

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  252. A New Feature by Spua7 · · Score: 0

    ...is the inability to log into either one of my accounts now. At least I won't run out of space and can keep receiving enlargment messages. I don't know how they ever found out I needed those.

  253. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    "illegal" means there is a law against it. ISPs don't make laws. Violating a TOS agreement is breaking a contract, not a law.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  254. Price dropped by rinks · · Score: 1

    as well. I'd been paying 29.99 per year for Yahoo Plus, with their huge half page blinking ads and 25 meg storage. The price dropped to 19.99 and now there's 2 gigs worth of space on there. They also added a "search email" button. So, if nothing else good comes from Gmail, at least the other providers are on the track to giving up more services. Hotmail hasn't followed suit yet, but I'm sure it's coming.

    --
    My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
  255. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been unable to access my mail all day. Why do I care? Because my job keeps me on the road and Yahoo was one way of staying in contact. Not today.

    Fuck 'em. I'm outta there.

  256. Included in all premium subscriptions. by FienX · · Score: 1

    I use the POP access and a custom domain name through Yahoo! for like ~$35/year and logged on this morning to find an email saying anyone with premium services will recieve the 2GB. Of course with POP access, why would I need this space when I download all my mail to my home systems? Given some of the recent problems with certain online email systems (uh, hotmail) deleting or *loosing* messages, I would rather trust the RAID on my home server (4x 36GB 15K SCSI w/hotspare).

  257. My $20/yr 'POP+Forwarding' upped to 2GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay $20 per year to be able to access my Yahoo mail via POP3, plus the ability to use Yahoo's SMTP server. This morning, I got a message telling me that I was being upgraded for free to 'Mail Plus' which includes that plus an upped storage capacity to 2GB. About once a month, I'd exceed my 6MB storage because someone sent a few large attachments (I've had a Yahoo email for a while, so I had 6MB.) My wife who signed up after me only had 4MB, and hers would run over more often. She also has POP/Forwarding, so I assume hers will be upped as well. Heck, with 2GB, I think I'll tell it to just always leave messages on the server. (For now, I have it set up so that it deletes messages after they've been on my computer a week.)

    I'm posting from an anon computer, but when I get home I'll post the text of the email.

  258. Bloody good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...take advantage of the fact that idiots run whatever software you send them and ensure that a little of it is actually productive.

    Of course, it won't stop their computer falling over because of all the other crap they clicked "okay" to.

  259. Yahoo! Spam Filter sucks also because... by rodrigo_braz · · Score: 1

    Another annoying point is that I get a lot of spam in Chinese but am not able to set a filter for that. That would help a lot in getting rid of spam.

    Try telling this to them, though. Trying to send them a suggestion about their spam system always takes you to a pre-formatted page to *report* spam, which you can do from the email interface anyway. They are unreachable.

  260. Yes, but that's a hassle. by rodrigo_braz · · Score: 1

    Checking two email accounts takes longer, and searching for an old message requires going to two sites. Forwarding is not an option if you want Google's interface since Yahoo!'s forwarding is paid for (I assume Google will let people forward and pop3 their email though).

  261. It's not the space by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 1

    What all of these providers fail to realize is that the popularity of Gmail has to do with 2 things, and neither of them are the 1 Gig limit. 1) It's exclusive. Only certain people have it, so everyone else wants it. On that note, I have 3 invitations and nothing to do with them. Let me know if you're interested. 2) Search. Gmail has the best email search I've ever seen. Other providers simply can't compete with Google's search technology.

    --

    ----
    Ground Control to Major Tom...
  262. @gmail.com by Liquiddarknessvi · · Score: 0

    @gmail.com is sooooo much cooler then having @hotmail.com or at yahoo.com. I for one would just like to finally cut the cord from M$ and switch my @hotmail.com for @gmail.com. I registered for hotmail before it was owned my M$ and I never would have if I had known they would buy it. Funny how M$ tries to buy everything I love.

    --
    Geek Code Version 3.0 GSS d? s++ :++ a--- C++++ UL+ P L+++ E W+++ N+ O? K- W--- O- M+ V-- PS--- PE--
  263. It is theoretical. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Or did not you see the Beta word plastered in the sign on page?

    I don't have one, and most people don't.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:It is theoretical. by afree87 · · Score: 1

      Oh, so it's THEORETICAL then! I admire your strong grasp of the English language!

  264. Don't be childish. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Oh, sorry, you should be 16.

    gmail is beta, most people do not have an account.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  265. Don't be dense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Anybody with enough or $$$ can go to London and see it for themselves.

    Many people applied for beta accounts of gmail and obviously (and understandably) only a few have them.

    For the immense majority of Internet users, gmail is a lot of hot air and hype, willfully helped by some of the testers.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  266. Gmail account anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey... I've got a couple gmail invitations that I'm not using... if anyone wants a gmail account just drop me an e-mail at:

    duncan.deyoung@gmail.com

  267. Neither is Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is Gmail "Opera-unfriendly," it's unusable with Opera. That's my biggest gripe with it so far, but for now I'm OK with switching over to Mozilla for using my Gmail account.

  268. Everyone snoops mail. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In Gmail's case it's having them snoop your mail, placing "relevant" adds in strategic locations, on a beta quality product that hasn't been long-term tested.

    Hey, how do you think SPAM filtering happens? Magic SPAM fairies that use ESP to detect SPAM without opening the mail?

    In Googles case they just use the scan to also feed you a few relevant ads. It's not like there is a dirty old man behind the curtain laughing at your email to your mom or what have you. It's an automated system with no state, or persistance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  269. Oh what nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I have my Yahoo account for years, and very rarely it filled up (6 MB).

    Recently with spam counting against your quota and more and more graphic attachments I was seriously considering alternatives (I also like POP3 access, I want to backup my own email in my own backup media, thanks).

    And now Yahoo gives me what I need: 100 MB when I would have been happy with 20 or 30 at most.

    I think they do get it, no wonder they have been around since the popularization of the Internet.

    Now I don't need to change an email address that everybody that knows me is familiar with.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  270. Here's the message... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1
    Okay, so I've been subscribing to their POP/Forwarding access service. (I'd had my address for a long time, but got sick of using webmail, so for $20/year, it seemed worth it. Plus, I have my personal domain's email linked to it.)

    So they've sent this email:

    Notice: Your POP Access and Forwarding service has been improved

    Dear Yahoo! Mail POP Access and Forwarding Subscriber,

    Thanks for being a loyal Yahoo! Mail user. To show our appreciation, we've expanded your POP Access and Forwarding service to include all the benefits of the improved Yahoo! Mail Plus, at no additional cost. Yahoo! Mail Plus includes:
    Virus scanning and cleaning provided by Norton AntiVirus(TM)*

    SpamGuard Plus, a personalized spam filtering system

    No graphical ads

    No promotional taglines in messages you send

    Total message size of 10MB, including attachments

    2GB of email storage

    At the end of your current billing cycle, unless you cancel before that date, your Mail Plus service will auto-renew at $19.99/year**.

    Thanks for using Yahoo! Mail, and we hope you enjoy the additional features now available to you at an even lower price. For more information, please click here.

    Sincerely,
    The Yahoo! Mail Team


    The only thing I dislike is the 10MB attachment limit. (Every once in a while, I'd like to send something larger. But my work lets me send unlimited size, so I just use that when I need to.)

    2GB is so ridiculously much space that now I'll leave all of my messages on the server, instead of having them delete after a week.
    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:Here's the message... by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1
      The only thing I dislike is the 10MB attachment limit.


      Gmail has the 10mb attachment limit as well.
  271. Why do you need 3 GB of email storage ? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Answer: you don't.

    Consumerism tainted of laziness.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  272. 2 things I've thought of... by runamok1 · · Score: 1

    1. Hotmail is still a PALTRY 2 megabytes. Is that a joke or what!!?? 2. Has anyone else considered the *ahem* 0-day file sharing possibilities available with 1 gig email accounts? Can you say iso1@gmail.com and iso2@gmail.com, etc.? What is the biggest size attachment that each system will accept?

  273. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by adzoox · · Score: 1

    breach of contract is breaking the "law"

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  274. Remember where Yahoo! Mail really came from? by aknodel · · Score: 1

    I was using something called RocketMail back in...'97 I think? Then RocketMail bit it (or was bought by Yahoo!) and my email address then turned to "name.rm@yahoo.com" instead of "name@rocketmail.com" My how long ago that was...and how far we've come. There is no point to this post. Just thought I'd post anyway.

  275. Re:100 Mb? Mailservers illegal by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Well, your original post made it sound like you meant criminal law - it invoked images of heavily armed police breaking into your house in the middle of the night to shut down your mailserver in the same way they shut down a drug lab or counterfieting ring.

    Besides, although there are laws saying "you can be sued if you don't comply with the terms of this contract you signed", it's not as if there's a law saying "you are not allowed to run a mailserver"

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  276. Yahoo Messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo Messenger has been broken all afternoon. Sign-ins just hang at the "Connecting as..." screen.

  277. SSSP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SIXTH hundred and SIXTIETh POST!!!!

  278. Space isn't the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Yahoo acct I would check every day if it would work properly with any browser other than IE. As it stands, the word "unusable" springs to mind...

  279. Re:Capitolism/capitalism by Trackster · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Maybe he's hinting at something by using capitOlism vs. capitAlism... We all know what happens at the capitol don't we?

  280. Bulk mail not counting... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    it's actually been working that way for about a month for my account... 4000+ spam sitting there now (Unfortunately, probably a few real emails too.)

  281. Yahoo! Mail stealthily google bombed! by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1
    Okay so here is the real reason Google started Gmail:

    The page cannot be displayed
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.


    Atleast that's what I see all day while trying to check my Yahoo! Mail free account.


    As I see it: Google created Gmail. Forced Yahoo! to upgrade their free mail offering. Yahoo! upgrades. People go nuts and overload their whole friggin' mail system. Yahoo! mail goes down. Google laughs. Gmail remains up and running. Yahoo! spends oodles of money to upgrade systems to the new upgraded mail specs. Google says Gmail a failure and pulls the pug. Yahoo! eats crow. Google laughs more.


    Just an idea...

  282. Google business practice just a uncalled bluff by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Well, as long as Google has their Stanfordites running the helm, they're going to not have that thing public. They'll keep it "beta" to deflect criticism, and go on with other services that can be done so. They learned this lesson from Orkut, and this is the only way Google will ever work as long as they can use this bluff. Compete by making your products scale limited, and you dont have to spend a dime. The only thing is, that at some time, Google's bluff will be called, and they'll end up eating crow while those who truly have the scale and openness that Google doesnt. (given their policy of keeping things internal yet being "open" to the public)

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  283. Mozilla is getting better by solprovider · · Score: 1

    Oops. I opened www.yahoo.com with MSIE to check. You are correct.

    www.yahoo.com's "Help" link is part of the graphic at the top. I was using Mozilla 1.3.1 with "Accept images from originating server only". Mozilla1.3's "Manage Images" was useless.

    I just upgraded to Mozilla1.6 to check if I could still complain. It is now possible to allow images from certain servers! The interface is quite user-intensive, but it is possible. The user has to know that the images are coming from yimg.com to add that domain to the Allow list. The "Copy Link Location" is useful, but the interface still expects too much knowledge and work from the user.

    Right-clicking an image (or the space where it should appear) has the option "Block images from this server". It does not have the option "Allow images from this server" or the more useful "Allow images from this domain". And "View image" still opens the image into the whole window (or tab) rather than showing it in context (as any user would expect.)

    Mozilla is slowly improving. Maybe they will get an interface designer to help the project soon. Or should I be checking Firefox for a user-friendly experience?

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  284. Re:Mozilla is getting better (Addendum) by solprovider · · Score: 1

    After upgrading from Mozilla1.3 to Mozilla1.6, it changed the theme to the default. When I tried to change it, it complained that the chosen theme was for a previous version, and please click OK to uninstall it. After clicking OK, the "Apply Theme" menu refused to open until I restarted Mozilla.

    After repeating this twice (to prove the bug), I went into Preferences and removed all the themes for previous versions. Preferences does tell you which themes are for previous versions, but there is no "Remove all obsolete themes" button. Better would be a "Upgrade all themes" button, with the question to automatically remove all themes that cannot be upgraded. This would require each theme to remember where it came from, and for the websites to have the ability to know there is an applicable version. This should be easy if architected well.

    I then downloaded the current Microzilla theme. Why do most of the themes use big buttons? Screen space is always at a premium. I usually run 1024x768 (on a 21" monitor), and often need to adjust higher to have enough space (or use a second PC to browse while working on my main box.) I was on a friend's PC earlier today, and she runs 800x600 on a 15" monitor; Mozilla with the default large icons uses about one quarter of the screen for non-content.

    ---
    BTW, I just got mod points again. The last batch expired unused this morning.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  285. Re:This is how storage space claim will be rendere by bandy · · Score: 1
    No one really needs more than 100M of email space.
    bandy@pasture bandy $ du -s Mail
    2124322 Mail
    bandy@pasture bandy $

    I do.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  286. Nope, chump change. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Many, many people have my current email address. I have several other email addresses set up to point to my address. All of my email is in the account, and that account is accessable from anywhere.

    Saving $20/year is not worth the hassle of moving to a different account.

  287. Re: Yahoo spam filtering by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Troll

    YOU ARE A DUMB FUCK

  288. Rediffmail 1 GB by hormuz · · Score: 1
  289. Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya! by Moqawama · · Score: 1

    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!

    The American pigs do not know what awaits them very soon. We will make their cities burn like they burnt al-Fallujah! America will soon forget 11 September when they see what is in store for them in the coming months!

    The American dogs will die in the millions for the death they have brought to our lands!

    DEATH TO AMERICAN DOGS.