Slashdot Mirror


User: El+Gordo+Motoneta

El+Gordo+Motoneta's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
41
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 41

  1. Re:what went wrong? on IBM Desktop Linux Pledge, One Year Later · · Score: 0

    "I'm guessing you work for the mob. Can I send you a resume?" No need, billy. We already know stuff about you. Our Senior manager, Vinnie, who works at the casino, knows your two brothers. Tell Tim we're sorry about his leg, but maybe that eMule download was not such a good idea after all...

  2. Re:what went wrong? on IBM Desktop Linux Pledge, One Year Later · · Score: 0

    "And _I_ would have you fired for getting in the way of doing my fucking job." Each company has it's ways, i guess. But where i live, if you need a program installed, you ask the admins for it. If we catch you installing stuff without permission, you are the one in trouble.

  3. Re:what went wrong? on IBM Desktop Linux Pledge, One Year Later · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you even read the article?

    Do you REALLY believe that a *corporate desktop* computer
    needs to "easily install software" or "configure printers"?

    I, for one, would cut off your fingers if i caught you installing
    crap on one of my company's workstations.

    Having seen more than one medium-sized company deploy desktops,
    I'm positive that all computers are already configured to run
    anything they need to run and print anywhere they need to print
    *before* they are presented to the user.

    No. The problem is (as you might have learned if you R the FA)
    is at the application level. They are running into problem with
    web-based applications that were geared towards Internet Explorer.
    They are running applications on Wine (which they list as a
    temporary workaround themselves).

    So, you are right in that there are problems yet to be fixed,
    but completely failed to put your finger on what it is that needs
    fixing.

  4. Re:HL on Bizarre Deep Sea Fish Dredged Up By Tsunami · · Score: 0
    ...... "fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck?"
    No, man, I wouldn't put my thingie in there if you paid me a million dollars.
  5. Re:The expanded midsection is because... on Saturn's Moon Iapetus Has A 'Belt' · · Score: 0

    could have been worse.

    You could have said "Your planet's momma is so fat,
    that her belt is the EQUATOR!!!"

    =oP

  6. p2p www..? on Iran Cracks Down on Internet Sites · · Score: 0

    Ya know what would be cool? some kind of p2p way
    to access the web. The p2p network should run over
    port 80, and when i ask for any webpage i want
    to visit, any random (idle?) node could reply to
    my request and serve as a proxy for me.

    And NO! i DON'T mean windows 98 botnets =oP

  7. Re:'Extraterrestrial laser flashes'? on New and Improved SETI · · Score: 0

    No, man. laser pointers!! think of the cool laser pointers
    the aliens must have!!

  8. Re:350 Antennas on New and Improved SETI · · Score: 0

    nah. that should read
    ~fitzprrklpop~ople of nice bule ball, can you hear us now?~fwopzzwwep~

  9. @home? =oP on New and Improved SETI · · Score: 0

    So where do I download the client for this?

  10. Thin clients? on Why Microsoft Should Fear Bandwidth · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've got one question: If we still have not managed to make standard thin clients popular (what percentage of the market is using sunrays, for example?) -- and these work over a LAN at 100Mbps or more, then what is making these people think that just because there's broadband, everyone will just jump over this thing? Thin clients are NOT a replacement for a desktop computer. They are, if they get them to work as good as a thin client can work, office workstation replacements. Nothing more. You can't play games or video at decent rates using remote applications. Not even over a 100Mbps line. Not even using Citrix. I've worked with citrix myself and while it's performace over a low-bandwidth link is impressive, the look and feel of a remote application is not anywhere near perfect at 100Mbps. It's just not the same. So, *maybe* some big company will start offering this service. My prediction is that a few people will subscribe to it, use it for two days at the very most, and go back to their "primitive" local applications as fast as they can. But i guess we'll just see.

  11. Long live QT on Qt 4 Beta 1 Available for Download · · Score: 0

    QT is a cutie! ... get it? "kiu - tee"! get it?? thank you, thank you..

  12. BWAHAHA! on Four New Unpatched Windows Vulnerabilities · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've tested all of the vulnerabilities on Windows 2000 and they did nothing!! I'm invincibNOCARRIER

  13. ttp://example.com/ will au on ReactOS Runs On The XBox · · Score: -1, Troll

    n table on the built-in hard disk) were limited to the HAL. This is a first, important step towards better portability, as it has already underlined some shortcomings in our build system. What the port is lacking is hardware support: especially, ReactOS has no USB support at the moment, so it basically just sits there being pretty, because mouse and keyboard won't work. The network and video cards should be mostly identical to their "real" counterparts, so the Windows drivers for them should work (except the video card, a modified GeForce - it's been established we need some HAL trickery to make the Windows driver load). We wouldn't mind some help :-) To run ReactOS on the XBox you need our custom version of th

  14. to keep posto keep pos on Private Spaceflight Law Passes Senate · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illeg

  15. Re:Who needs sex anyway? on Venture Capitalists Think Open Source Again · · Score: 1

    well, you should try sex with a human being, at least once. Yes, i'm aware of the fact that you are only going to get it by paying for it, but still.

  16. Re:Oops. on FDA Approves Implantable RFID for Patients · · Score: 2

    Well, no. It's actually the same meaning that it always had =oP