Slashdot Mirror


Saturn's Moon Iapetus Has A 'Belt'

Believe writes "In another unexpected find by Cassini-Huygens, Saturn's moon Iapetus shows a bulging waistline. According to the story, the dark side of the moon is almost perfectly bisected by a tall, narrow ridge that runs for 1300 km (808 mi) and rises up to 20 km (12 mi) high. This height is amazing in such a small moon; it rivals Olympus Mons on Mars which is a body 5 times its size."

245 comments

  1. rotation ? by mirko · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does it rotates in the same direction as its parent's belt ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:rotation ? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the belt is a physical feature on the moons surface - not a floating belt of debris, rock, etc.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:rotation ? by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

      Now if there IS tectonic (could explain the dark debris in the northern hemisphere as well as the ridge) activity then one theorize that the belt is rotating in some fashion.

    3. Re:rotation ? by ch3 · · Score: 1

      This is a moutains "belt". Nothing to do with Saturn's belt. I assume it rotates with the moon, but I might be wrong ;)

    4. Re:rotation ? by Iron+Sun · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure I understand your question. But in case it helps, Iapetus is tidally locked to Saturn. This means that like our moon it always shows the same face to the parent planet, as it completes one rotation on its axis in the same time it takes to orbit the planet.

      The newfound ridge stretches the entire width of the dark hemisphere, meaning the one facing forward in Iapetus' orbital sweep around Saturn (and is thus half visible, half on the 'far side' from Saturn's perspective.)

    5. Re:rotation ? by fbform · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a ridge on the planet surface, not a ring.

      But I don't see why it is "amazing in such a small moon". Aren't larger irregularities to be expected with smaller bodies? For instance, the Mariana-Everest difference is about 19 km, so Earth's crust can be described crudely as "R0 +/- 9.5 km". Olympus Mons on Mars is at 26 km above surrounding ground. Comets are not even spherical - the "peaks" are as big as the rest of the "planet". So why is Iapetus's ridge considered surprising? I'm more interested in the ridge being *only* as tall as Olympus Mons, which is on a planet 5 times the size of Iapetus.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    6. Re:rotation ? by nijk · · Score: 1

      The most unique, and perhaps most remarkable feature discovered on Iapetus in Cassini images is a topographic ridge that coincides almost exactly with the geographic equator.

      Apparantly, yes.

    7. Re:rotation ? by Rei · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is why Slashdot is treating this as new news; they were first noticed by Cassini in pictures taken between October 15-20, 2004, and had been detected previously by Voyager. They've been widely reported in the past reporting about the Cassini mission (for example, here on Dec. 8th)

      Slashdot: Yesterday's News, Today!

      --
      Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
  2. Leave an 'ol moon alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Age does wonders to the old waistline sonny. You'll get yours.

  3. deathstar? by Phil246 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with that ridge on this pic : http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/image -details.cfm?imageID=1270 it REALLY has a passing resemblance to a death star.
    did anyone else notice this?

    1. Re:deathstar? by CdXiminez · · Score: 2

      Years ago, Saturn's moon Mimas was identified as a Death Star.

    2. Re:deathstar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally. I was going to make one of those lame "That's no moon, it's a space station!" posts.

    3. Re:deathstar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That makes two 'deathstar' moons around saturn then.
      Wheres the Rebel alliance when you need it ;)

    4. Re:deathstar? by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      Because of the spam filter, strings longer than 50 characters (i think?) are separated from the following characters...so here is a more clickable link.

      But yah, with the waistline and the rather omnious circular crater in the center, it does make you wonder if a Rebel refugee has taken refuge at Saturn.

    5. Re:deathstar? by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      More like a lemon, I think. The Death Star had other features that this moon presently lacks.

    6. Re:deathstar? by tahii · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness I read that - I was beginning to think that we had slashdotted NASA!

    7. Re:deathstar? by famebait · · Score: 1

      did anyone else notice this?

      Nope, not one. Move along now.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    8. Re:deathstar? by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Death Star had other features that this moon presently lacks.

      Oh come on. Give it a break. It was built a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. It has a lot of miles and a lot of years on it. I think it looks good for its age.

      When 4 billion years you become, look as good you will not.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    9. Re:deathstar? by johnbr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you tilt your head 15 degrees to the left, this one looks like Death Star V2 (only partially finished) There's room for both in our solar system, I think!

    10. Re:deathstar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's what happens when a Halo gets caught on a moon. Damn covenant drivers!!

    11. Re:deathstar? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      did anyone else notice this?

      no, nobody noticed this, not a single person in the 500 times it has already been posted to Slashdot. You are so observant- thank God we've got Phil246 to notice these things!

    12. Re:deathstar? by operagost · · Score: 1
      These aren't the droids we're looking for.
      Move along now.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:deathstar? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      Yes, but if you tilt your head 15 degrees to the left, this one looks like Death Star V2 (only partially finished) There's room for both in our solar system, I think!

      They probably parked them in orbit around Saturn after the filming of the first few Star Wars movies. (Assuming they didn't use the same death star for all the movies.)

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    14. Re:deathstar? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Nah. Looks more like a walnut.

    15. Re:deathstar? by revividus · · Score: 1

      I thought it looked more like a walnut.

    16. Re:deathstar? by revividus · · Score: 1

      Oops, I'm redundant. But at least it validates my "orbiting giant walnut" theory I intend to submit to the astronomic community next month.

  4. The belt is not a ring by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    Tidal forces could be wrenching the moon in half.

    I doubt if the moon at one time split and just happened to re-assemble exactly where it split.

    1. Re:The belt is not a ring by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      I have two half-baked theories: After the large impact, the planet was sent into a spin, centrifical force pushed the debris out to the equator where it settled. My other thory was explained much better in is in the first link in the post. I don't think this looks like volcanic effects.

    2. Re:The belt is not a ring by Rei · · Score: 1

      If it were set to such a rapid spin, where did all of the energy dissipate to? Yes, it is tidally locked with Saturn (79 day period), but that would be some major energy to dissipate through tidal locking if you want to have it end up this slow.

      However, you are right to think that centri*fugal* forces can play a roll on a body's shape. Usually this is manifested as an equatorial bulge - even Earth has one. Relatively fast spinning gas giants like Jupiter have dramatic bulges.

      However, normally centrifugal forces don't create a distinct mountain range; it's typically a smooth, gradual bulge. Perhaps we're looking at, as another possibility the decay of a mini-ring system around the moon itself (although, then why would it appear to be distinct mountains?), or perhaps centrifugal forces which weakened the crust enough to encourage volcanism in that region alone (however, Iapetus's low rotation speed seems problematic for this). Who knows... It's an interesting puzzle, just like the moon itself.

      P.S. - not all volcanism produces cinder cones, you know... some volcanism is just simple flows oozing from under the surface.

      --
      Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
  5. So do I... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but you don't see it on the front page of Slashdot.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:So do I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I take it your aren't this guy then.

    2. Re:So do I... by Fruvous · · Score: 1

      With the latest trends you might: Microsoft Produces a stable 64bit OS. Microsoft Anti-Spyware outdoes AdAware and Spybot. Black Parrot has a belt.

      --
      This is one of those witty signatures that you'll remember.
  6. Can you see it now... by thegoofeedude · · Score: 0

    "Overweight moon turns to Atkins diet as last resort"

  7. Black and White moon by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    "The flyby images, which revealed a region of Iapetus never before seen, show feathery-looking black streaks at the boundary between dark and bright hemispheres that indicate dark material has fallen onto Iapetus. Opinions differ as to whether this dark material originated from within or outside Iapetus." It appears as if Iapetus' leading edge is becoming covered with material from its sister moons as well as the rings of Saturn.

  8. NASA... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's no moon.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:NASA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its a satellite.

    2. Re:NASA... by hamsterspeed · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's no moon.

      It's a SPACE STATION!

      I have a very bad feeling about this...

      --
      pants
    3. Re:NASA... by De+Bas+Meister · · Score: 1

      Seriously, doesn't the ridge make it look kind of like the Deathstar? With a big enough crater to form the dish...

  9. Arthur C Clarke by panurge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I think it was had a story about a planet with a wall round the middle. (A long time ago now.) If there's any chance this wall has similar properties, we need to get a robot down there to take a look at it.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Arthur C Clarke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stanislaw Lem had a story about a two-coloured planet with a line intersecting it in the middle, with two countries permanently at cold war :)

    2. Re:Arthur C Clarke by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      In fact in the novel of 2001 the Discovery goes to Saturn not Jupiter and in particular to Iapetus where as Clarke mentions there is an enormous visual discrepancy between the light side and the dark side ... of course in 2001 there was an eye like object on one side with a ginormous monolith as the pupil.

      Never read 2010 or 3001 (or whatever) so I don't know how this was resolved with Europa etc.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    3. Re:Arthur C Clarke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I think it was had a story about a planet with a wall round the middle. (A long time ago now.) If there's any chance this wall has similar properties, we need to get a robot down there to take a look at it.

      Similar properties... like being a fictional object?

    4. Re:Arthur C Clarke by petterbergman · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a short-story by Clarke about a universe that contains only one sun and one planet, the universe is about as big as the planets orbit. The planet is constantly showing the same face toward the sun, it has a day-side, very hot, and anight side, very cold. Humans live around the equator where the temperature is right.

      In the book the universe actually ends somewhere around the north pole(dark side) of the planet and a long time ago humans built a great wall to hide the end of the universe... great short-story.

    5. Re:Arthur C Clarke by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      The book 2010 was written as a sequel to the movie, not to the book. There are some things in the book from the book 2001 ("My god, it's full of stars!" wasn't in the movie - yes,I've checked a dozen times), but it discards Saturn and re-sets everything to Jupiter. The reason Jupiter was used in the movie? They couldn't get a convincing enough Saturn, and decided that by eliminating the ring by depicting Jupiter instead they'd simplify the FX issues.

    6. Re:Arthur C Clarke by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of Dr. Seuss... The Butter Battle Book anyone?

    7. Re:Arthur C Clarke by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      They couldn't get a convincing enough Saturn, and decided that by eliminating the ring by depicting Jupiter instead they'd simplify the FX issues.

      As I recall, ACC said the Saturn effects were realistic, but so strange they weren't convincing -- fortunately they didn't let that argument sway them from zero g, silence in space, the sparse asteroid belt, and all the other true-to-life but counter-intuitive effects.

      The SFX guy however, Douglas Trumball, found a way to use Saturn effects he'd worked out when he made Silent Running, a rather silly space movie, though endearing in places. That didn't concern itself much with scientific veracity.

    8. Re:Arthur C Clarke by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      He did describing them as "unconvincing," true - though I don't remember the "realistic, but strange" part. Anyway, there are several places you could look, including *The Making of Kubrick's 2001*, Clarke's *Lost Worlds of 2001*, and I think there's an intro to 2010 (that's the most likely place).

    9. Re:Arthur C Clarke by fbjon · · Score: 1
      "Clarke mentions there is an enormous visual discrepancy between the light side and the dark side ... of course in 2001 there was an eye like object on one side with a ginormous monolith as the pupil."
      Exactly. My first thought was: "My god, it's the still unopened eye of Iapetus!"
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  10. Lucas be praised! by duffahtolla · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Lucas be praised! by dolphin558 · · Score: 2, Informative
  11. Oh my God - it's full of... by adnonsense · · Score: 1

    ...stars!

    (if you believe in the book version that is).

  12. Why surprising? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it surprising that tall mountain ridges are found on small (relative to planets) moons, where there may be little weather and low gravity to cause their erosion?

    1. Re:Why surprising? by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

      Tall mountain ridges of this magnitude would be surprising on planets like Venus and Earth because of the high gravity. Not on small bodies like Iapetus.

    2. Re:Why surprising? by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is surprising in the way these mountains are on the moon's equator and form a nice belt.
      That there is little erosion isn't a surprise, but the mountains origin is far more interesting.
      On earth mountains are all results of our molten core (plate tektonics and vulcanoes). There must be some process that created this moutain belt.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Why surprising? by HuguesT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For several reasons:

      On Earth mountains are caused by plate tectonics, i.e. disconnected area of crust floating on magma that run into each other, but such mechanism are impossible on small bodies because they cool too fast, i.e their crust quickly become too thick and form a single fused objet.

      Of course mountains can also be volcanoes, but similarly this implies magma that can rise to the surface, i.e a crust that is not too thick.

      The exception are moons close enough to their parent body so that internal heat can be sustained by tidal effects. This is the case on Io, for example.

      However there can only be tidal effects if the moon is rotating around itself at a different rate as it revolves around its parent body. For Iapetus, just like our moon, the two rates are the same and they always present the same face to their parent. This implies only minimal tidal effects due to the eccentricity of the orbit.

      Of course the mountain/volcano may have been formed a very long time ago when the moon wasn't as cool as it is now, probably this is the case for mount Olympus on Mars, however there is erosion on most planetary bodies even without atmosphere or low gravity, caused by the myriad of asteroid impact they sustain.

      One remaining option is impact by a large asteroid. We now have to come up with a reasonable impact scenario that can produce a feature similar to the one seen on Iapetus, which is indeed very strange.

    4. Re:Why surprising? by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have two theories...

      Less possible:
      What I'd look for are two large craters of similar size and same age (can be estimated by amount of erosion from later meteorites), placed on opposite sides of the moon, shifted from the surface of the intersection by similar distance in opposite directions. Strong enough hit could have just split the moon it two...

      More possible:
      The moon had its own ring, just like Saturn has. But the ring's rotation was slowed down by Saturn's gravity (the same way our Moon's rotation got stopped by Earth) and the ring was pulled by the moon's gravity down, on the surface, depositing all the material straight below its orbit.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    5. Re:Why surprising? by rhennigan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm willing to bet there used to be a ring around the moon, that eventually fell out of orbit, piling up in a neat row around the equator. Then again, IANAKP (Knowledgable Person), so feel free to suggest why this might not be possible.

    6. Re:Why surprising? by LeninZhiv · · Score: 2, Funny

      One remaining option is impact by a large asteroid. We now have to come up with a reasonable impact scenario that can produce a feature similar to the one seen on Iapetus, which is indeed very strange.

      Easy: two big asteroids struck the moon simultaneously on both poles!

    7. Re:Why surprising? by helioquake · · Score: 1

      The presence of Saturn itself would disrupt the formation of a ring around a small planetary body like a satellite, I would think. Not that I have done n-body simulation for this type of things.

      If not, then I'd bet the gravitational perturbation alone would increase perpendicular motion of this hypothetical ring in the plane of rotation (i.e., the ring would get puffed up).

      In any case, I'd look for geophysical reasons before invoking some "ring" theory.

    8. Re:Why surprising? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Note the moon is stopped in its rotation around saturn (1day=1year) and the ring is right around its equator. That would be a strong coincidence for the forces to appear right there. On the other hand, this symmetrical layout would be about the only possible where Saturn's influence wouldn't "puff" the ring and could actually stabilize it in this position.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    9. Re:Why surprising? by helioquake · · Score: 1

      Tidal lock doesn't necessarily mean that the revolution of Iapetus is in the plane of the ring or Saturn's rotation (or is it so? I can't locate its ephemeris).

      Besides this object is so small that it is more likely to be part of Saturn's ring. Its gravitation field is not significant enough to trap a larger number of small bodies as Saturn does. And if you're saying that Saturn's ring particles gets deposited there, then that's probably not right either. As they decend onto the surface, it'd make a crater, not mountains. I'm pretty sure the differential velocity is large enough to do that.

      So sorry, I'm not buying this yet. Give me some numbers and I'll happily listen, though.

    10. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So sorry, I'm not buying this yet. Give me some numbers and I'll happily listen, though.
      13 42 69 512 666 - Happy?

    11. Re:Why surprising? by LS · · Score: 1

      Damn you and your plausible theories! I was hoping this would finally be the strange artifact that would have scientists announcing "we have finally found signs of extra-terrestrial intelligence". punk...

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    12. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is proof that a divine being was responsible for creation of the solar system. I think it's called the design argument or something. Anyway, like all such bodies, it was assembled from two hemispherical halves, just like rubber balls are made in a factory. In this case the two halves didn't quite line up. I guess the being was in a hurry that day. But since it was just a minor moon, the being thought that probably nobody would notice and decided not to fix it.

    13. Re:Why surprising? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      There's no reason why a satellite can't have a satellite. A ring system is just another orbiting object (or rather, many, many objects). Planets in our solar system have moons, and rings, after all, and their orbits are not disrupted by the Sun. Therefore, it should be possible for a moon to have a natural satellite or ring system. I don't know that we've ever seen that in practice, but we did put a man-made orbiting vehicle around our own Moon.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    14. Re:Why surprising? by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Both are doubtfull.

      Plate technonics tends to make subduction zones along arcs, not in straight lines. Volcanism outside of subduction zones tend to be in hot spots, not lines. So neither is likely to be the cause of this.

      I'd guess that the cause is core colapse. The crust got strong enough (relative to the size of the moon) to resist techtonics. The core shrunk through cooling or volcanism or both. Then the crust colapsed along the weekest line to take in the size. The weakest line was the equator. The poles were thicker either through more cooling, or less inner turbulance in the mantle.

      My only second guess, though I don't give it much credit myself, would be a hotspot that is moving in a straight line around the equator and leaving a line of volcanos behind it. It does not appear very volcanic in the picture, and it is too even.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    15. Re:Why surprising? by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tidal lock doesn't necessarily mean that the revolution of Iapetus is in the plane of the ring or Saturn's rotation (or is it so? I can't locate its ephemeris).
      Actually Iapteus could orbit opposite to Saturn's location and perpendicular to the ring, it doesn't matter. What only matters is so its orbit axis was parell to its rotation axis when it had a normal daily cycle yet (no tilt), and paralell to its ring axis. (so tidal lock was changing speed, not direction of rotation). Nowadays when it's stopped it's impossible to tell.

      Its gravitation field is not significant enough to trap a larger number of small bodies as Saturn does.

      Sure it wouldn't if it was somewhere in open space. But in Saturn's ring it has enough debris nearby to catch them. Much lower strength but way more material to catch. And weak gravity isn't that much of a problem as most of the ring material travels at similar speed, very slowly, so obtaining a "high orbit" for a random piece of rock moving only slightly faster or slightly slower than the moon is really easy.

      As they decend onto the surface, it'd make a crater, not mountains.
      So they do. Great most of them. Only some that get onto its orbit get to create the ridge. They can keep orbiting for millenia (and get stabilized on the equatorial orbit from any randomness where they got) before they finally slowed down by gravity fall to the surface, and as Iapteus has no atmosphere, they can orbit an inch over the surface and still won't fall unless they hit something (horizontally), and rapidly losing speed fall somewhere more or less on vector of their orbit. You get a crater from a really powerful hit from straight above, when a fast moving body (be it accelerated by gravity or just floating through space at high speed) hits the surface. Not from a satellite of atmosphere-less planet, hitting the surface horizontally.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    16. Re:Why surprising? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Plate technonics tends to make subduction zones along arcs, not in straight lines. Volcanism outside of subduction zones tend to be in hot spots, not lines. So neither is likely to be the cause of this.

      Don't you think plate tectonics is specific to planets of volcanic core?
      Rules that apply to a planet with hot liquid core don't apply to cold bodies of debris stuck together.

      I'd guess that the cause is core colapse.
      Nice theory but what would be the reason for it to happen? And why is the line so straight?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    17. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they may have one hell of a mole problem on Iaepatus

    18. Re:Why surprising? by lambkabobwithfeta · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I bet the ridge is an accumulation of material from Saturn's rings. Rationale: - The ridge spans the leading face of Iapetus - Saturn's rings are not very thick at all, smiliar to the width of the ridge - The wide black band spans the leading face of Iapetus along the same axis/plane of the ridge - Saturn's rings are not fixed. NASA scientists have already postulated that Saturn's rings will slowly fall into Saturn's atmosphere over the next few million years. Iapetus could have plowed through a no-longer existing portion of the rings, building up the ridge over time - As ring particles crashed onto Iapetus, they created small craters on the ring, throwing up powdery debris - The powdery debris was blown northward and southward from the ridge, landing on the face of Iapetus and creating the wide black band. The far north and south of Iapetus are so sloped that is is difficult for particles to adhere.

    19. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saturn got angry one morning a billion years ago, and smacked the moon around a little bit.

    20. Re:Why surprising? by Caltheos · · Score: 1

      Its not a moon, its a giant plastic easter egg with goodies inside. We must get a team of robots out there post haste to figure out how to crack it open. Just hope the candy inside isn't stale

      --
      We've secretely replaced the Enterprise's dilithium crystals with Folgers crystals. Lets see if they notice.
    21. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bet would be the thermal stress from the uneven heating from Saturn due to the moon being tidal locked has over say 500 million years or so caused the range to form.

    22. Re:Why surprising? by djward · · Score: 1

      To set a thing or two straight about plate tectonics (not tektonics, or techtonics; parent got it right, about 5 other posts have not) on Earth, the pieces of lithosphere (crust+uppermost rigid mantle) float not on magma but on hotter, solid mantle rock that flows plastically and behaves like a fluid on long timescales. The magma that we observe coming to the surface is the result of partial melting (a few % only!) of this solid mantle rock. All of which has very little to do with the molten (outer) core of the earth.

      Not picking on parent here specifically, but on several other posts as well.

      At any rate, you are correct that Iapetus is probably too small to have fully differentiated and heated to the point of convection of rock, molten or otherwise. What I'd like is more data on what is inside Iapetus. Europa, for instance, probably has an icy shell surrounding liquid water (or other cold fluid). The surface of Europa is covered in arcuate pairs of ridges. One explanation for these is that cracks have formed in the surface due essentially to tidal stresses in the fluid under the ice, and fliud propagates to the surface of the moon along these cracks, spills to either side of the crack, and freezes, forming ridge pairs.

      The point is that there may be several ways to form a ridge like the one on Iapetus (though its position is curious) but it's hard to know which mechanisms are reasonable without more data on the interior of the moon.

    23. Re:Why surprising? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to bet there used to be a ring around the moon, that eventually fell out of orbit, piling up in a neat row around the equator. Then again, IANAKP (Knowledgable Person), so feel free to suggest why this might not be possible.

      There is virtually no atmosphere, so no air braking. Orbits do degrade due to tidal friction, but just prior to fragments of a ring hitting the surface they'd still be in an orbit, moving very fast (1500 km/hr by my calculation). So if they did finally touch down to the surface, it would be very violent, fragments would go all over the moon (again, not slowed by air) and not fall in a narrow band to form a mountain ridge. Also, if the ridge was a pile of such fragments, it'd be a sand castle, and subsequent impacts would knock it flat in short order.

    24. Re:Why surprising? by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing more or less. I was thinking more that perhaps this moon actually brushed against the Saturn's rings or possibly even went through it. I don't think you would end up with a mountain range though, probably a canyon of some sort.

      --
      "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
    25. Re:Why surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vulcanoes? You mean the cereal with Spock on the box?

    26. Re:Why surprising? by helioquake · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point (and being modded up...sigh).

      In an ideal world where everything falls as 1-D numerical grid, that may work. But there are n-body rotating around the object plus Saturn, making it difficult gravitationally to achieve what you hypothesize. If what you're saying is true, there are other cases where a similar geographical feature is observed. That's my argument based on statistical occurrence. I know it's weak but that's all I've got at this point. And IAAA but never really cared about planets.

      It's easy to concoct a "model" that is not easy to verify. You can believe in it, but that ain't science.

      And someone said "a satellite can have a satellite": yes. but having a ring is a whole different story. You have to think how to create a stable gravitational field to keep the ring to form first, and then destroy it later. Easy said, hard to do.

    27. Re:Why surprising? by argent · · Score: 1

      You get a crater from a really powerful hit from straight above, when a fast moving body (be it accelerated by gravity or just floating through space at high speed) hits the surface. Not from a satellite of atmosphere-less planet, hitting the surface horizontally.

      For grazing impacts you get parallel grooves as displayed by the moons of mars. For almost any other angle of impact, the released kinetic energy dominates and you get a more or less circular crater: elliptical craters are rare, but they're still craters rather than mountains.

    28. Re:Why surprising? by argent · · Score: 1

      If the impacts were of small enough objects over long enough time, you might get layers of ejecta that built up into mountains.

      Another possibility is that an encounter with ring material while it was still cooling weakened the surface enough for volcanic outflow to build up the ridge.

      I'd still class these as very low probability, either one requires Iapetus to be lined up with the rings to an unlikely degree of precision.

    29. Re:Why surprising? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      ...on bodies of what size?

      The mass of Iapetus m=1.88E+21 kg
      The diameter of Iapetus 2r=1,436 kilometers (radius r=718E3 m)
      G=6.7E11 m3 kg-1 s-2
      v0=sqrt(mG/r)

      v0=419 m/s
      That's the orbital speed at the level of surface of Iapetus. Not all that impressive?
      In many cases it won't even get the rock to break. If it breaks, the dust lands somewhere further, but on the same vector, covering the strip of land, filling other craters. If it just slightly rubs the surface of the dust (note the descent may be very slow, as much as fractions of a milimeter in a single orbital period!) it starts rotating, losing its energy, then rolls on the surface till it stops. Now I don't know what effects are responsible for creating the orbit of a body but I don't know of any moon of polar orbit around its planet, most of them are more or less equatorial. But the chances are many orbiting bodies will get the equatorial orbit before landing/impact and the amount of dust falling on the route will cover the craters/groves created by falling bodies.

      Now what makes me wonder is, can similar (maybe much smaller) structures be observed in other small atmosphere-less moons of Saturn?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  13. A bit of a stretch I guess by andrewjhall · · Score: 1

    But it could be a continuous monolith? A mobius monolith perhaps?

    Give a geek an interesting, if fictional, concept and he's doomed to make lame jokes about it for the rest of eternity....

  14. Priorities by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 0, Troll

    Gee, am I glad we're spending what remaining money we have left as a country blowing up Brown People instead of funding more projects like this. I'll tell ya... seeing those flag-draped coffins is much more gratifying than these silly pictures.

    Er.

    Oh, yeah... I'm also happy we spent all that money to fill in the hole we had already dug for the SSC. Now that's priorites, baby!

  15. not quite that high by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    The NASA summary says the ridge can reach 20km/12m wide. The height only reaches 13km/8m, only about half the actual height of Olympus Mons. Proportionally, though, it's about 2.5 times the size of Olympus Mons. Still very impressive.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:not quite that high by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Proportionally, though, it's about 2.5 times the size

      the height.

      Olympus is a single top. This is a ridge, very long.
      Comparing a lake 1km wide and a river 1km wide...

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:not quite that high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lighten up poindexter - unless you have a better analogy to show the scale of these ridges that without using the term pringles.

  16. LBA similarity by heitikender · · Score: 0

    Well, now we know where Little Big Adventure blatantly copied its planet, as we can see here: http://www.geocities.com/simon_lba/worldz.gif :)

  17. it's obvious by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    the moon is giving birth

    duh

    sometimes the ignorance of basic science i see around here is so depressing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it's obvious by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it is the remains of the ancient circum-Iapetus particle accelerator.

    2. Re:it's obvious by jeif1k · · Score: 1

      In what species does "giving birth" involve having a narrow belt around your midsection???

    3. Re:it's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a giant parasite sucking the life fluids of Iapetus. It must be nuked, otherwise its next victim might be Earth.

  18. It's all about justification by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    YOU go up on Capitol Hill and make the case for transferring money to a space project of your choice. If you can make the case that taxpayer $$ is better served funding your dream then it will happen.

    1. Re:It's all about justification by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't see how that would be possible, considering we have the Western world's absolute stupidest politicians, who are chosen by the Western world's most fervently anti-intellectual electorate.

      Cost of Cassini mission per day (max): $821,917.81
      Cost of Iraq War per day (min): $225,563,909.77
      Cassini mission body count (since 10/15/97): 0
      Iraq war body count (since 3/19/03) (min): 15,094

      Anybody can present the numbers. But who's listening, really?

    2. Re:It's all about justification by Dano+Watt · · Score: 2, Funny

      It cost me $1 to buy a cheeseburger this afternoon, and to my knowledge no person was killed in the process. So I guess with your logic, the government should spend billions on cheeseburgers. Well, I wouldn't mind.

    3. Re:It's all about justification by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I'd dare say the world would be better off. Heck, if they just burned 200 billion one dollars bills the world would be much better off.

    4. Re:It's all about justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq war body count (since 3/19/03) (min): 15,094

      That number is way too small. Try this one instead.

    5. Re:It's all about justification by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      the government should spend billions on cheeseburgers But we are already spending billions on pork.

  19. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like a walnut to me.

    Must mean that humans were created from space aliens and the egyptians were actually a space fairing race.

    1. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, it means that George Bush is going to send a crack team to go crack it open so he and his dynasty can have space walnuts for EVAR!

    2. Re:Hmmmm by junklight · · Score: 1

      Nah - this is proof of GOD:

      you can see the joins!

    3. Re:Hmmmm by fataugie · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly, I was thinking it was where the "Planetary Model Kit" didn't trim the flashing that well.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    4. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I wouldn't want to see the alien nut cracker that opens that.

  20. Irregular Tectonics by p0 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Lapetus has strange magnetic fields or equator centric tectonic movements.

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  21. yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now for some interesting news maybe...

    1. Re:yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of news do you find interesting?
      I bet when you get cable you keep switching channels...

  22. Must be a newly formed moon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...otherwise the belt would be much higher =)

  23. I know! by Vo0k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/image -details.cfm?imageID=1270
    http://www.theforce.net /swtc/Pix/books/weg/dstc3.g if

    Striking similarity, isn't it? :)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  24. The expanded midsection is because... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... it ate too many MARS BARS

    Ahhhahahah! hahahaha! hahahaha...ooooo, just shoot me now.

    1. Re:The expanded midsection is because... by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct response to this includes "Uranus" somewhere... :)

    2. Re:The expanded midsection is because... by El+Gordo+Motoneta · · Score: 0

      could have been worse.

      You could have said "Your planet's momma is so fat,
      that her belt is the EQUATOR!!!"

      =oP

  25. nerds rejoyce by helioquake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my, thousands of nerds will come out and rejoyce over this pic.

    Screw science tag; it's Star Wars, baby!

    [Literally, I expect to see little scientific discourse on this thread...so sad.]

    1. Re:nerds rejoyce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As pointed out earlier in the thread, I would say Mimas looks more like the Death Star.

      Well, not the 15th picture, anyway.

    2. Re:nerds rejoyce by helioquake · · Score: 1

      Of course, I hoped that I could've spelt "rejoice" correctly.

      [This one is gonna get attention of nerds as well as spelling nazi's.]

  26. It's a stretch mark... by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    ...you insensitive clods. :)

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  27. Thanks by scum-e-bag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thanks.

    Stories like this make slashdot cool.

    --
    Does it go on forever?
  28. Kim Stanley Robinson's A Short, Sharp Shock by boa13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Coincidences are weird, sometimes.

    Kim Stanley Robinson is well known for his hard sci-fi Mars trilogy (Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars). He has also written a small and memorable fantasy book, A Short, Sharp Shock, which takes place on a strange world covered by sea, almost perfectly bisected by a tall, narrow ridge that seems to run all around the world (but maybe only for 1300 km?) and that sometimes almost reaches the sea, sometimes climbs up to great heights (20 km maybe?).

    Just a coincidence, of course, but it's funny that a man who loves space in general and planets in particular would use an existing but at the time unknown geological feature as the basis of a fantasy book.

    1. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson's A Short, Sharp Shock by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      Speaking of coincidences, my friend from work just let me borrow "Red Mars" today.

    2. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson's A Short, Sharp Shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More coincidences:
      In "Red Mars" they build a centrifuge-train on a Mars moon.
      They run a train on tracks around the moon very fast
      in order to get an enviroment with decent gravity.

      Would work pretty well as long as the train stays latched to the tracks.

      Maybe the Iapetus tracks are just covered :-)

    3. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson's A Short, Sharp Shock by hmniq · · Score: 0

      Another interesting coincidence that I'm surprised hasn't been mentioned:

      In Arthur C. Clarke's novel 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on Iapetus. A vast black circle has been painted on the moon's surface, with the monolith occupying a smaller white circle at the centre. Remarkably, when the Voyager space probes arrived at Iapetus eighteen years later, they did indeed photograph an enormous, roughly circular black region with a whiter region within it. Clarke reports that Carl Sagan, who was on the Voyager imaging team, sent him a photo, with the note 'Thinking of you...'

  29. Not 20km high by little1973 · · Score: 1

    The ridge is 13km high and 20km wide.

    --
    Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
  30. I think I speak for many when I say... by solios · · Score: 3, Funny

    o_O.

    It's a giant space WALNUT. :O

    1. Re:I think I speak for many when I say... by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      In Korea, only old people have belts around their equator.

    2. Re:I think I speak for many when I say... by Ed_1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's made of chocolate. The ridge is where the two halves of the mould met.

    3. Re:I think I speak for many when I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. that's no moon... by mabinogi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me, or does that photo look disturbingly like an almost completed Death Star?

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  32. What you meant to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no moon, that's a battlestation!

    1. Re:What you meant to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Blasphemer! Do not utter the sacred words of Star Wars incorrectly in the hallowed nerd halls of Slashdot!

      INTERIOR: MILLENNIUM FALCON -- COCKPIT.

      _________The distant star can be distinguished as a small moon or planet.

      LUKE: Look at him. He's headed for that small moon.

      HAN: I think I can get him before he gets there...he's almost in
      range.

      ________The small moon begins to take on the appearance of a
      ________monstrous spherical battle station.

      BEN: That's no moon! It's a space station.

      HAN: It's too big to be a space station.

      LUKE: I have a very bad feeling about this.

      HAN: Yeah, I think your right. Full reverse! Chewie, lock in the
      auxiliary power.
  33. hrmm by magister · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does anyone else notice that with that one crater and the ridge, it looks surprisingly like the Death Star.

    Anyway, thats my .02$

    --
    -magister-
  34. The Wall Around the World by AYeomans · · Score: 2, Informative

    See the story The Wall Around the World written in 1953 by Theodore R. Cogswell. And look out for the Dark Man!
    (The Wall separated the technologists from the magicians.)

    --
    Andrew Yeomans
  35. I'm a product designer by I7D · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that is definitely a parting line, just an artifact of the mold.

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
    1. Re:I'm a product designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quite true. It was a budget moon so it is bound to have some minor issues.

      Sincerely,
      Magrathea planetary wharf

    2. Re:I'm a product designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if its anything like thailand, the aliens on the left side are available for analsex

    3. Re:I'm a product designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technician: "The spec says deburr!"
      Manager: "Screw that, it'll cut into my bonus. I doubt anyone will ever notice, and if they do, I can just blame you."

  36. Re:Hmmmm - No a macadamia nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know th difference? You never get walnuts in space

  37. Size confusion by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "This height is amazing in such a small moon; it rivals Olympus Mons on Mars which is a body 5 times its size."

    Article submitter didn't take Astronomy 101 apparently. Small planetoids tend to have more prominent geological features than larger planets because stronger gravity pulls everything together harder and flattens things out. For instance, Olympus Mons on Mars is much higher than any mountain on Earth precisely because Earth has stronger gravity.

    1. Re:Size confusion by ralphh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The submitter is rephrasing the JPL news release, which a implied a similar awe. In part: "No other moon in the solar system has such a striking geological feature. In places, the ridge is comprised of mountains. In height, they rival Olympus Mons on Mars, approximately three times the height of Mt. Everest, which is surprising for such a small body as Iapetus. Mars is nearly five times the size of Iapetus."

      --
      "A worthy cause has never been harmed by the truth" - Gandhi
    2. Re:Size confusion by SsShane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, Mars has a much thicker crust than Earth. Our mountains literally sink into the mantle when they reach a certain mass.

    3. Re:Size confusion by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Other people just say Olympus Mons is much higher because its THE vlocano with the longest span of activity.

      While gravity makes planets to be round, it has not such a great effecct as that it "flattens" mountains.

      The difference between Himalaya and Olympus mons is: the former is a folding mountain, where two plates press against each other and the later is a shield vocano.

      If at all you could argue that "volcanos" behave different depending on gravity.

      Regards,
      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Size confusion by beeplet · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is gravity alone which accounts for the size difference, but mainly weathering and erosion, for which you need an atmosphere. Earth has this in abundance, Mars relatively little, and Iapetus probably none at all. Gravity has nothing to do if there is no wind or rainfall to knock loose stones to begin with. (Of course, the gravity of the planet is a factor in whether it can retain an atmosphere to begin with...)

    5. Re:Size confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got things backwards. The size difference is due mainly to gravity, and weathering and erosion to a lesser extend.

    6. Re:Size confusion by Preeminence · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but Mars has one of the most active atmospheres in the solar system dust storms that cover the entire planet, hundred-mph winds, etc. One of the main problems facing human exploration there is making a suit that is both flexible and can withstand that. Erosion on Mars is definitely a factor.

  38. no, lush was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://images.northamerica.lush.com/zoom/52.jpg

  39. theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be so that it was somehow cracked during its early days and then settled again?

  40. Ok, a REAL theory by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

    Forget the walnut jokes, and the deathstar jokes, a real idea, to be shot down with real science (I hope):

    1) Moon form as overall a solid shell, but has a core containing radioactive materials
    2) Due to composition, heat builds up faster than it escapes, and builds preasure as the center expands
    3) Preasure eventually causes outer solid shell to crack along the equator at the time, molten material flows out, and forms band, and solidifies, never to occur again.

    Thoughts?

    1. Re:Ok, a REAL theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thought :
      Why would this phenomenon be present on the equator and not anywhere else ?

      and another : although I am not a geologist, don't you describe a normal volcanic and tectonic activity as they happen on earth?

    2. Re:Ok, a REAL theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same question, rephrased: "Why would this phenomenon be present anywhere else and not the equator?"

    3. Re:Ok, a REAL theory by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Like all real science, it's too weird to adequately theorize. But I'll toss in my ignorance and say tidal stresses along the equator causes the cracking and extrusion of material.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    4. Re:Ok, a REAL theory by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      All other factors being equal, there is more stress at the equator than at other regions due to spin. As such, for something like this to occur, it would "most likely" happen there, although I won't even guess at the odds of the theory being correct. What 5%? 1%? It's a theory.

  41. It's not a ridge, it's a seam... by matt_wilts · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..like a Russian Doll, open it up & there's another moon inside!

  42. Does it have a name yet? by josgeluk · · Score: 1

    Let's call it Kirk's Equator.

  43. Re: Peace on Earth by Lem by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative
    Stanislaw Lem had a story about a two-coloured planet with a line intersecting it in the middle, with two countries permanently at cold war :)

    It was our Moon, with Earth countries having a telepresence war. One of the best Lem books IMHO.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  44. The Iapetusian Wall by TintinX · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a remnant from the Iapetusian Cold War, when the folk from the northern hemisphere were separated from those in the southern.
    Be grateful that Cassini-Huygens' lens isn't more powerful or you might have been able to make out David Hasselhoff standing on it singing a song about freedom.

  45. Wait a sec... by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    Where are all the sperm trying to get in?

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  46. 'belt' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad the editor put the word 'belt' in quotes, otherwise I would have assumed that one of Saturn's moons was having trouble keeping its trousers up.

  47. Production fault... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Slartibartfast forgot to remove the glue that remained after merging the two half-sphere's together...

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  48. A few suggestions... by balloonhead · · Score: 1

    1. It was originally two moons, of the same size. They collided, leaving a ridge at the join.

    2. It will become two moons, of the same size. It is in the process of mitosis.

    3. It is a giant cricket ball.

    4. This is the seam the mould left.

    5. There is no spoon. I mean, moon.

    6. Aliens did it as a display of power.

    7. We did it, millions of years ago, before nuking ourselves and starting again. As a warning to ourselves in the future, which we are now ignoring.

    8. Aliens did it for a joke.

    9. This is what the Beagle has been up to since we lost it.

    I have run out of ideas and can't think of any proper suggestions.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    1. Re:A few suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. We did it, millions of years ago, before nuking ourselves and starting again. As a warning to ourselves in the future, which we are now ignoring.

      Actually neanderthals, homo erectus' and others were mutants left from the great nuke war. More precisely they were commie mutant traitors.

  49. They had to put a belt on it ... by sstidman · · Score: 1

    ... cause it kept mooning passing ships.

    --
    Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
  50. That clever SCO by syntap · · Score: 1

    THAT's where it's hiding it's intellectual property theft evidence!

    My best sig is this one.

  51. Amazing? Why? by slavemowgli · · Score: 3, Interesting

    his height is amazing in such a small moon

    Why? There is a limit on which heights are possible for a given celestial body (planets etc., that is, I'm not counting in stars here), and that limit is actually higher for a smaller body (for example, a volcano the size (height) of Olympus Mons wouldn't even theoretically be possible on earth).

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  52. Planetary romance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were originally two half moons, and they found each other and fell in love.

    Fer crissakes, stop peeping at them.

  53. Nut by geo.georgi · · Score: 1

    So, we have a really really big nut! The question is only what's inside, and what you need to smash him, in order to find what's inside.

    1. Re:Nut by Dysan2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new giant, spacefaring squirrel overlords.

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
  54. So what they're syaing is... by 10537 · · Score: 1

    Iapetus is American?

    --
    This sentence no verb.
    1. Re:So what they're syaing is... by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Iapetus is American?

      If not, then we should most certainly naturalize Iapetus as an american citizen, and thus establish our first extraterestrial territory.

  55. really? the equator you say? by stormi · · Score: 0

    funny that it coincides with a line that is imaginary eh? what happens if the Martians had a different equator, that separated things diagonally instead of north to south? Throws off the whole coincidence.....

    --
    "if only i had known i would have been a locksmith." -albert einstein
    1. Re:really? the equator you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "human" equator is based on physical properties of the object being considered. Pray tell, what physical property would a "diagonal" equator represent?

      I'm sure that the Martians on Mars would come to the same basic conclusions about the physical behavior and makeup of their planet as we have with ours. They would use different words of course, but the actual properties are the same.

  56. Wrong turn by LS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like Bugs Bunny definitely took a wrong turn at Albuquerque...

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  57. Kim Stanley Robinson by TuataraShoes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having just read the very fine Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson, he describes the spectacular collapse of a space elevator causing a ring that went almost twice around the equator of Mars.

    Actually, the space elevator was actually one of Arthur C Clarke's ideas

    The structure of the ring is a bit different from this one, but the location (along the equator) is the link.

    --
    Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird -- Proverbs 1:17
    1. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Clarke himself attributes the space elevator to Tsiolkovsky. On this one, Wikipedia has it right.

    2. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another version of a orbital elevator collapse depicts it shattering into untold billions of tiny fragments, which are of no particular threat to anyone.

      I suppose the image of the elevator crushing everything twice around the planet is a more exciting visual.

    3. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      If I remember that type of collapse is due to friction with the atmosphere and the thing burning up as it slowly comes down. Mars has a much thinner atmosphere.

      It probably also depends on how long each of the nanotubes used for the elevator is.

  58. we need interplanetary shuttles by xmp_phrack · · Score: 1

    so some idiot can go climb this

  59. Re:Farkst Parst!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KING of teh FAILURES1111!!!!LOL

  60. Um.... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/image -details.cfm?imageID=1270

    Dare I say it?

    That's no moon....that's a space station!

    I believe we should start training our X Wing pilots to hit Womp Rats in Beggar's Canyon NOW.

    --
    -Styopa
  61. Sensible non-death-star explanation by adeyadey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many of the smaller moons/asteroids are barely spherical, and having been hit so often, barely held together by gravity. given the size of the impact crater, it is possible this moon was nearly torn apart by that impact, and the belt is a relic of that event.

    Some of the smaller moons & asteroids out there are more like piles of rubble held together by gravity than solid bodies - thus the headaches in what to do if one were ever found to be on collision course with earth, since an attempt to move it of course would merely fragment the body..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  62. fluid? by geo.georgi · · Score: 1

    However there can only be tidal effects if the moon is rotating around itself at a different rate as it revolves around its parent body. For Iapetus, just like our moon, the two rates are the same and they always present the same face to their parent. This implies only minimal tidal effects due to the eccentricity of the orbit.

    Right now, that's true, but maybe this was not the fall in the past.
    Note, that this mountain ring seem's to be very old. See on the photo
    http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/moons /images/PIA06166-br500.jpg on how much places the mountain ring is broken. This means he is older than the formations, who broke him. It will be probably not wrong to say, he is at least one milliard years old. Maybe he is relict from times, when the equator was fluid. When the fluid freeze you have your mountain across the equator.

  63. Another, but... by IPFreely · · Score: 1
    Another book with a world with a wall around the middle. But it's probably not the one you are thinking of.

    Midnight at the Well of Souls.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  64. Here's a thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is at the moons center, like a belt. Where do the gravitational poles lie in contrast? Just a thought.

  65. Obviously an early design from Magrathea by cbelt3 · · Score: 1
    They just didn't design the mould properly. If we inspect closer, you'll see a big circle with an alien "M" in it for the trademark .

    In separate news, I would be willing to expect that someone will point out that a planetoid like this little dude does not form in the 'interstellar void' where it is expected to be nicely spherical. This sucker grew up exposed to some mondo tides, so it's reasonable to assume that while the crust may have cooled significantly, the core may look like a kneaded bowl of bread dough, and be nice and toasty. Makes sense that there is a pressure ridge of crust all the way around it. Hey- this planet has a pressure ridge of crust too ! Just worn down and cracked all over the place...

  66. Footfall? by Mukaikubo · · Score: 1

    If we find three rings braided into a ponytail, it's time to start stockpiling nukes in Washington.

  67. I'm divided. by yobbo · · Score: 1

    http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/image -details.cfm?imageID=1270

    Does it look like:

    a) the death star
    b) a lemon
    c) the suse logo

    ???

  68. Obviously It's full of cheese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...underneath that delicious italian crust.

    1. Re:Obviously It's full of cheese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it does cost $1 more than than a regular moon.

  69. Obviously... by mikael · · Score: 1

    It was assembled - the two halves must join somewhere...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  70. I know! It's.... by emilng · · Score: 2, Funny


    a giant mold line.
    Since we're all wildly speculating anyway.

  71. That's *too* straight by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I have *real* trouble believing that's natural.

    Damn, we missed 'em by how many millions of years?

    mark

  72. Second thoughts: I *know* what it looks like... by whitroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone read Kim Stanley Robinson's [Red/Green/Blue] Mars?

    Reminds me of the *big* space elevator cable that fell. If that caused lava flows/vulcanism in a line....

    mark

    1. Re:Second thoughts: I *know* what it looks like... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I have. Awesome series IMO.

      Oh? That really didn't come to mind when I read about the belt. An odd formation to say the least.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Second thoughts: I *know* what it looks like... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      The first thing that jumped to my mind was... WTF... OMFG, spill mountains!!

      I really should get to work now.

  73. message from Iapetus by jthayden · · Score: 1

    It's just a little extra holiday weight. You know how it is, it's hard to stay on your diet during the holidays. I'm working on getting rid of it and would appreciate it if you didn't keep bringing it up.

    Honey does this belt make my moon look big?

  74. mimas is by wh173b0y · · Score: 1

    http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA05423
    the real death star...looking....moon......thing.

  75. How many miles? by daten · · Score: 1

    Two pages are linked in the /. post, the first page says:

    "One of these features is a long narrow ridge that lies almost exactly on the equator of Iapetus, bisects its entire dark hemisphere and reaches 20 kilometers high (12 miles)."

    But the second page says:

    "The ridge is conspicuous in the picture as an approximately 20-kilometer wide (12 miles) band that extends from the western (left) side of the disc almost to the day/night boundary on the right. On the left horizon, the peak of the ridge reaches at least 13 kilometers (8 miles) above the surrounding terrain."

    So how high is that ridge?

  76. Ridge is only 8 miles high by woods · · Score: 1
    According to the article text, the ridge is twelve miles wide and eight miles high:
    The ridge is conspicuous in the picture as an approximately 20-kilometer wide (12 miles) band that extends from the western (left) side of the disc almost to the day/night boundary on the right. On the left horizon, the peak of the ridge reaches at least 13 kilometers (8 miles) above the surrounding terrain.
    Still very impressive for the size of that moon, of course.
  77. Correct me if I'm wrong... by Ayaress · · Score: 1

    But didn't the Death Star have a trench around its equator, not a ridge? So wouldn't that make this a soft of anti-Death Star? A Life Star if you'll excuse my poor humor.

  78. Die-cast planetoid made in Macau... by juanfe · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone forgot to file this down.
    The Intelligent Design pushers will have a field day with this one!

    --
    ***Foucault is watching you..***
  79. Fight! by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Unicron, I choose you!

  80. measurements are slightly wrong by fatpelt · · Score: 1

    notice that it is only 8 miles high. from http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/image -details.cfm?imageID=1270 The most unique, and perhaps most remarkable feature discovered on Iapetus in Cassini images is a topographic ridge that coincides almost exactly with the geographic equator. The ridge is conspicuous in the picture as an approximately 20-kilometer wide (12 miles) band that extends from the western (left) side of the disc almost to the day/night boundary on the right. On the left horizon, the peak of the ridge reaches at least 13 kilometers (8 miles) above the surrounding terrain. Along the roughly 1,300 kilometer (800 mile) length over which it can be traced in this picture, it remains almost exactly parallel to the equator within a couple of degrees. The physical origin of the ridge has yet to be explained. It is not yet clear whether the ridge is a mountain belt that has folded upward, or an extensional crack in the surface through which material from inside Iapetus erupted onto the surface and accumulated locally, forming the ridge. The origin of Cassini Regio is a long-standing debate among scientists. One theory proposes that its dark material may have erupted onto Iapetus's icy surface from the interior. Another theory holds that the dark material represented accumulated debris ejected by impact events on dark, outer satellites of Saturn. Details of this Cassini image mosaic do not definitively rule out either of the theories. However, they do provide important new insights and constraints.

  81. Yeah, I thought it was obvious too by QuasiDon · · Score: 1

    I thought it was obvious too, I wonder how many obvious explanations are out there.

    Isn't it obvious that this is proof that God exists? It is left over evidence that all moons were put together from two parts, kind of like those gum ball machine eggs that come with toys in them.

  82. I've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get a pattern like that when your mold is worn and doesn't close properly before injecting polymer. Not to worry, it's nothing a regrind and a little re-molding won't cure.

  83. I don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who put that thing back together again after they took it apart, but
    a) they should have aligned the halves correctly; and
    b) I wonder what's inside?

  84. Holy cow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they found God's scrotum.

  85. Solve by supercomputers? by Muttonhead · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is farfetched, but is it possible with present day AI for a supercomputer programmed with the knowledge of every scientific fact about physics to come up with possible scenarios as to how a moon might develop a feature like this belt?

  86. I don't know about you, but... by iapetus · · Score: 1

    ...I find allegations that Iapetus has 'a bulging waistline' quite offensive and hurtful.

    Not untrue, you understand. Just hurtful.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  87. Arthur C. Clarke's "The Wall of Darkness" (1946) by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    http://math.cofc.edu/faculty/kasman/MATHFICT/mfvie w.php?callnumber=mf319

  88. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i'm no scientist, but a couple of thoughts:

    1: the ridge's length coincides very well with one axis of the extent of the dark material on the moon

    2: (according to the article, i can only barely make this out myself) a large number of the craters have exposed clean ice only on the part of the rim that would be sheltered from anything coming from the equator. this includes the really big, old crater in the center of the picture, but also lots of newer ones.

    3. *none* of the visible craters (as far as i can make out) have a clean basin, implying (to me) that the black material was laid down since the last significant impact on the moon; although, without wind, maybe most of the black material was just lifted straight up and fell right back down.

    so, i would guess that the center ridge formed as a very odd volcanic eruption (or passing blow by a planet killing laser) which threw black material over half the moon. apparently this happened relatively recently, and not in conjunction with the large crater visible on the picture (though maybe with another newer one that isn't visible)

  89. Death Star by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    That's totally the Death Star trench. I mean, no question about it.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  90. I thought it was quite that high by aoki_taichi · · Score: 1
    Where does that "13km" come from?
    NASAsays that it
    reaches 20 kilometers high (12 miles). It extends over 1,300 kilometers (808 miles) from side to side,
    Can you tell me the URI of "NASA summary"?
    Sorry if I am missing something.
    1. Re:I thought it was quite that high by LuxFX · · Score: 1
      Hmm, interesting, NASA is giving contrasting information.

      The link I was referring to was the second, labelled tall, narrow ridge, which had this to say:

      The ridge is conspicuous in the picture as an approximately 20-kilometer wide (12 miles) band that extends from the western (left) side of the disc almost to the day/night boundary on the right. On the left horizon, the peak of the ridge reaches at least 13 kilometers (8 miles) above the surrounding terrain.
      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    2. Re:I thought it was quite that high by serutan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the articles contradict each other. Looks ilke somebody got their numbers mixed up. But any way you look at it, a high ridge running around the equator like that is pretty weird and cool. It will be interesting to hear theories of how it got there. I'm sure the face-on-Mars enthusiasts have it figured out already and are updating their websites at this very moment.

  91. kalidasa by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    If any of y'all wind up working for the parent poster, make sure to hold on to your hands....(from Arthur C. Clarke's _The Fountains of Paradise_ (1979))

  92. Chinese secret space program uncovered .... by constantnormal · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Great Wall of Iapetus imaged by Western surveillance satellite.

    Film at 11

  93. Don't flip out just because of a coincidence by pclminion · · Score: 1
    It is a very typical "failure mode" of the human mind. We see something coincidental that catches our attention, and assume that something fishy must be going on.

    We can rest assured in the fact that, for every moon that coincidentally has a ridge coinciding with its equator there are thousands of moons elsewhere which do not. The reason we notice the "unusual" arrangement is precisely because it is unusual. Unusual to the human mind, that is.

    How many mundane events happen to you on a daily basis? And how many coincidental and weird ones? Does that mean there is a ghost following you around making strange things happen? Of course not. We notice weird stuff because that's what our brains evolved to do. Ignore the usual and pick out the unusual.

    Yawn...

    1. Re:Don't flip out just because of a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I suppose if a monkey happened to write the complete works of Shakespeare, you'd yawn at that as well.

    2. Re:Don't flip out just because of a coincidence by pclminion · · Score: 1

      You're seriously equating a ridge on some moon with a monkey producing the works of Shakespeare? Talk about desperate argumentation...

  94. Obligatory PF by onemorechip · · Score: 1

    According to the story, the dark side of the moon is almost perfectly bisected

    There is no dark side of the moon, really.

    As a matter of fact, it's all dark.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  95. Where are the stars? by UncleMark · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that pictures of objects in space would have stars in the background, but no picture from NASA has stars anywhere.

    Other than the obvious conspiracy theories, is there an explanation?

  96. The moon looks like a walnut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moon looks like an cold walnut.

  97. Ahem... by pjt48108 · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't this moon have been formed by the collision of two similarly-sized bodies? Not a spectacular Industrial Lights and Magic collision, but suppose they were in the same (or similar) orbits that eventually converged? I imagine it as more of a crush than and crash.

    This might account for material not flying out. Additionally, it might account for the equatorial ridge, where mantle materials piled up on each other during the crushing gravitational embrace. As gravity pulled the new object closer to circular, bits crushed up around the equator. However, that gravity, while having created a new, larger, circular body, but might not have been strong enough to erase a feature as relatively small as this ridge.

    I am not a student of science, however, so don't think I have anything to support this notion with other than wild fantasy and lack of interesting shows on basic cable.

    --
    Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
    1. Re:Ahem... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      No way, and here's why:

      1. No spin. At least none mentioned in the article. Any offset in approach would have resulted in a spin of some kind at an angle to the seam.

      2. You're talking to moons of exactly the same size.

      3. You're talking about a very slow approach that would allow the moons to melt into each other rather than crushing each other.

      4. They'd have had to be running exactly parallel to each other without strongly attracting each other, as opposed to shepherding each other in a braided orbit. The braided orbit would have degraded into the two moons tightly orbiting each other, and the final merge would have, again, resulted in a very tight spin.

      I just don't see it.

      Also, while the entire surface is scarred with a tremendous amount of old and multi-layered craters, the seam doesn't seem to be that damaged, suggesting that the ridge is younger than some of the craters. Two moons merging would have caused enough volcanic activity to repave nearly the entire surface.

      On the other hand, I wouldn't buy that this was an expansion at the middle. Such expansion would have fractured the entire globe and certainly wouldn't have only appeared in a straight line at the equator.

      What it looks like to me is that it got hit by something *seriously* large, something that knocked a bunch of material off or that burst on impact. Perhaps even a moon, but one much smaller and moving in the opposite direction, perhaps captured. That would explain the dark material -- a body of different material, splattered, then collected as the larger moon continued in its orbit.

      The collision, as I picture it, cracked the crap out of the large body. I don't see pix of the other side. I'll bet there's one hell of a crater on the opposite side. Perhaps tidal stresses caused by Saturn made the equator weaker than other areas, and with just the right punch, it cracked right own the middle. But then that implies that the middle oozed out to create the ridge, otherwise it would be just a crack, right? So why not more volcanic activity? Why just a ridge?

      Neato.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  98. Tuff guy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Iape has a grey belt in the martial arts. I ain't gonna mess with him. I'll go pick on Mimus instead. Mim already has a missing eye."

  99. how cool... by haaz · · Score: 1

    how cool is it that we're seeing this, and some of us, years ago, were so fascinated by the images coming back from Voyager 2 that we were certain we'd become astronomers, space explorers, little future Buck Rogers and Dr. Whos... this is awesome. :D

    --
    -- haaz.
  100. if you think this is news... by i+3+joo! · · Score: 0

    wait until they see Iapetus' chewy nougat-filling.

  101. There is no dark side of the moon by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    It is all dark.

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  102. height above what? by aoki_taichi · · Score: 1

    Oh thanks ! Sorry I didn't see that link.
    I don't know how they define height of land features on heavenly body with no sea.
    Maybe it is "13 kilometers (8 miles) above the surrounding terrain" but somehow "20km" above something(average height ?).

  103. Silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That's where they screw the two halves together.

  104. Mould lines by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    Simple, that is where the two parts are glued together. Obviously the maker didn't find the time to clean it up before displaying it.
    ______

    --
    Huh?
  105. Fashion faux pas by banausikos · · Score: 0

    It also has suspenders.

  106. That's no moon... it's a space station! by JPamplin · · Score: 1
    Sorry, it's probably been said, but it's so appropriate here:

    That's no moon...it's a Space Station! ;-)

  107. Dark Side... by douglips · · Score: 1

    Pedants like to point out that there is no "Dark Side of the Moon" when referring to Earth's Moon, because during the month all portions of the Moon eventually have a full "day" of sunlight.

    In the case of Iapetus, there really is a dark side, not because one side never sees the sun, but because it is just, well, dark. For some reason half of Iapetus is dark, and the other half is light - much like those Star Trek guys.

    Here's NASA's page on the subject of Iapetus' dark side.

  108. Iapetus' Belt - Proposed Explanations by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    10. The moon was actually injection-molded.
    9. The hill is the remains of an ancient alien rail-gun launcher.
    8. Iapetus, in a fit of sibling jealousy, has attempted to grow its own rings.
    7. Percival Lowell accidentally based his sketches on the wrong planet.
    6. This is the planet from Kim Stanley Robinson's "A Short, Sharp Shock", without the oceans.
    5. The moon was tectonically separated aeons ago from Vallis Marineris.
    4. This is the solar system's frenulum.
    3. Ringworld deorbited here.
    2. Not much, just loosening its belt after the holidays.

    and..

    1. That's No Moon...

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  109. That's no moon.... by AJWM · · Score: 1

    That's the Solar System's biggest walnut.

    --
    -- Alastair
  110. Re:deathstar? - Yes. by Slicker · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Starwars story begin as a dream of something that happened long ago? Maybe this was a vision. Perhaps The Force is real.

    Perhaps this is the Death Star after a billion years, covered with cosmic debris....dust, rocks..

    And perhaps, this was part of the war ware 1/3rd of the Angels rebelled against heaven, as per biblical accounts... Separating good Angel's from the fallen ones (Daemons), from which we get UNIX. You never really know..

  111. Re: Peace on Earth by Lem by jgrahn · · Score: 1
    Also don't forget Theodore Sturgeon's 1958 short story The Comedian's Children which starts with a failed manned mission to Iapetus itself in 2034:
    Captain Swope's mission was to accomplish the twelfth off-earth touchdown, and the body on which he touched was Iapetus, the remarkable eighth satellite of Saturn. All Saturn's satellites are remarkable, each for a different reason. Iapetus' claim to fame is his fluctuating brilliance; he always swings brightly around the eastern limb of the ringed planet, and dwindles dimly behind the western edge. Obviously this little moon is half bright and half dark, and keeps one face turned always to its parent; but why should a moon be half bright and half dark?

    It was an intriguing mystery, and it had become the fashion to affect all sorts of decorations which mimicked the fluctuatings of the inconstant moonlet: cufflinks and tunic clasps which dimmed and brightened, bread-wrappers and bookjackets in dichotomous motley. [---]

  112. Re:My God, it's full of stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's in the movie, because not only have I seen the movie and never read 2001, but I can even spout "My God, it's full of stars." in exactly the same intonation used by the performer in the movie. Where would that knowledge have come from, if not from the movie eh?

  113. Hyugen's Parachute by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    Not to get too off topic, but off the page mentioned in this /. article, there're links to videos, mostly computer generated, and one is of Hyugens landing on Titan. According to the video, the parachute remains attached all the way down. In the video, the probe lands with a blackened impact dust-splot and the parachute very politely folds up on itself and lays neatly to one side. But what if the parachute lands on top of the probe? Would that suck or what?

    And I can imagine that at least two NASA engineers have discussed the chances of this happening and disagreed on the outcome. Cocky engineer #1 insisting that even a slight breeze is all it would take to cause the chute to fall to the side, and irritated engineer #2 slapping engineer #1 on the back of the head, knocking the gum from his slack mouth, as the pictures come back from the surface of Titan all looking like billowing white fabric.

    So anyone out there with some experience with parachutes have an idea if there's a way to build a parachute that always slides sideways on landing?

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  114. Re:My God, it's full of stars by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    I know it's in the movie, because not only have I seen the movie and never read 2001, but I can even spout "My God, it's full of stars." in exactly the same intonation used by the performer in the movie. Where would that knowledge have come from, if not from the movie eh?

    The sequel, 2010. It's not in 2001, only 2010 (unless they've made some change to the DVD in the past few years). You don't have to believe me, though, watch the DVD.

  115. Hmm...Launch Ramp by marcus · · Score: 1

    That's what I think it is. It is the remains of an an ancient and degraded alien mag-lev launcher.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  116. It's a Casting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks just like a mold joint ring on a large spherical casting that was never polished off before it was put into use. Perhaps Iapetus is merely a very large, old ball bearing, possibly a reject that was never properly finished. Possibly it came out of a Vogon Planetary Bulldozer.

  117. Not again... by Whomever · · Score: 1

    it looks like ANOTHER death star, or a giant walnut. You take your pick.

    --


    ----------
    perl -e 'print(pack("H*","646176652e7761676e657240676d6169 6c2e636f6d0a"));'
  118. I guess great minds do think alike by Whomever · · Score: 1

    It's funny to me that so many people commented on it's striking resemblance to either the death star or a walnut.

    We all posted before reading the other comments I guess...

    Just don't let covenant wake that thing up.

    --


    ----------
    perl -e 'print(pack("H*","646176652e7761676e657240676d6169 6c2e636f6d0a"));'