I thought it had something to do with time... Like, positrons were electrons going the other way in time, which is why they annihilate when they collide and produce a photon. Really the electron is hitting a photon and turning around in time. Likewise with pair production. Anyone know if this is right? I honestly think that quantum physics book was chock full of lies...
...are the scum of the earth. I can't stand that! Take separate notes! Respect the text for future users! And they always write stupid crap in'em, too.
Besides, they should've given'em to some real college students, like engineering majors. I'd love to stop carrying a pile 8 inches thick of textbooks around the campus every freakin' day. I mean, that can't be good for your back.
Actually, it's a widely accepted fact that cooking food vastly increased the amount of calories early man could consume and led directly to the development of higher functions. If anything, this article is about 40-50 years too late to be considered newsworthy.
I've seen both polarized films and shutter glasses, and they are not the same. You might as well be watching Creature from the Black Lagoon even with modern films. Additionally, without expensive projection equipment, the polarized technique is virtually impossible. It is no where near home ready, whereas the shutter glasses most definitely are.
Well, Arch has a very active developer/user group of exactly the type of people who would use this browser. I think they have a majority of a very solid niche market.
I believe this is the article that is quoted. I submitted it to the editor, but who knows if it'll get up there. Science articles listed therein are cited from print form.
Wow, an incredible post from a century ago, where the invention of Solar Cells is considered a recent development! Unless, of course, you're talking about modern Solar Cells, which were developed during the aforementioned grandmother's lifetime (1954).
I would contend that it is much simpler to avoid accidents in three dimensions than two: you have significantly more options should a collision be imminent.
How are these companies "businesses that you probably don't associate with Linux?" I've heard of at least the top 8, and they are all pro-Linux companies as far as I know.
If Microsoft was high on the list, I'd be surprised, or even Apple. IBM? Novell? Not so much.
To travel from one point to another, an object must pass through all the points in between. There are an infinite number of points "in between," thus to move at all, an object must travel through an infinite number of points in a finite time. Clearly this definition of reality is flawed: stop using it.
Slashdot Mirror
0=1+e^i(Alt something);
You could just use degrees and say 0=1+e^180i;
I dunno, it sounds to me like a "two otherwise respectable scientists got drunk one night and now are saying something pretty crazy" story.
Yea verily.
5 or 6 really decent electrical puns and you get a -1 Troll. Nice.
I thought Asia was in Eastern Europe...
Man, Faraday's gonna beat you up, you talk smack like that...
"Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
Dude! Fix your sig! Just make it say "Brooker, C" or something! Jeez.
Or the Northeastern United States.
Every 2bit moron wants to add his unintelligible opinion.
Indeed.
Sounds to me like their patent summary consists of slapping a computer onto an idea that's been around for over a century.
I thought it had something to do with time... Like, positrons were electrons going the other way in time, which is why they annihilate when they collide and produce a photon. Really the electron is hitting a photon and turning around in time. Likewise with pair production. Anyone know if this is right? I honestly think that quantum physics book was chock full of lies...
...are the scum of the earth. I can't stand that! Take separate notes! Respect the text for future users! And they always write stupid crap in'em, too.
Besides, they should've given'em to some real college students, like engineering majors. I'd love to stop carrying a pile 8 inches thick of textbooks around the campus every freakin' day. I mean, that can't be good for your back.
Actually, it's a widely accepted fact that cooking food vastly increased the amount of calories early man could consume and led directly to the development of higher functions. If anything, this article is about 40-50 years too late to be considered newsworthy.
I know I want high wattage wireless power beamed directly at my forehead. I don't know about anyone else, though.
Yes, exactly, thats why these silly "console" gaming systems will never catch on. Charging those PS3 controllers is such a hassle.
I've seen both polarized films and shutter glasses, and they are not the same. You might as well be watching Creature from the Black Lagoon even with modern films. Additionally, without expensive projection equipment, the polarized technique is virtually impossible. It is no where near home ready, whereas the shutter glasses most definitely are.
Yes, yes it was. My bad.
Well, Arch has a very active developer/user group of exactly the type of people who would use this browser. I think they have a majority of a very solid niche market.
focusing on creating software thatdoes its one and only job better
I think you agree more with the Unix philosophy than you realize. From the summary:
Unix Philosophy: 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well...'
I believe this is the article that is quoted. I submitted it to the editor, but who knows if it'll get up there. Science articles listed therein are cited from print form.
Dressing in copper armour and shouting "Thor is a fink!" in a storm will ruled as suicide(SCA)
will be ruled
Wow, an incredible post from a century ago, where the invention of Solar Cells is considered a recent development! Unless, of course, you're talking about modern Solar Cells, which were developed during the aforementioned grandmother's lifetime (1954).
I would contend that it is much simpler to avoid accidents in three dimensions than two: you have significantly more options should a collision be imminent.
How are these companies "businesses that you probably don't associate with Linux?" I've heard of at least the top 8, and they are all pro-Linux companies as far as I know.
If Microsoft was high on the list, I'd be surprised, or even Apple. IBM? Novell? Not so much.
To travel from one point to another, an object must pass through all the points in between. There are an infinite number of points "in between," thus to move at all, an object must travel through an infinite number of points in a finite time. Clearly this definition of reality is flawed: stop using it.