If you can't bear to kill your 'criminal' by ripping off their heads with a rope tied to the back of a F100 you're just putting lipstick on a pig and calling it pretty.
I strongly disagree with this sentiment. Even if you're against capital punishment you can still recognize the reality of the current situation and desire a better form of execution.
It's quite simple, if you yourself were to be executed which method would you think is more humane? CO2 buildup is an extremely painful way to die, not just merely "aesthetics." CO poisoning is as well. In studies (google for them), nitrogen (or another inert gas) has been shown to be one of the most humane ways to kill any mammal.
I, in fact, hope this sets a precedent and that states move to nitrogen gas as the primary method of execution. At least then the innocent people we kill wouldn't have to suffer while it's done.
I agree with you but the the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act opt-out "fee" is not a fee and is instead a tax penalty with no teeth (the worst they can do is take it out of an income tax refund.) And it allows exemptions for various reasons.
So it's really only a fee/burden on healthy people who make decent income and don't want to get health insurance and subsidize others. Anyone who is poor and who can't actually afford insurance (even with subsidies) is either exempt or just wouldn't bother to pay $95.
I'd just like to note that while electric cars are doing well in Norway I believe that Teslas are not the most popular cars in Noway.
I found the statement surprising and was hoping it was true but the claim seemed to be from news articles with cherry picked statistics over a short time period -- supposedly when batch orders were being delivered. Basically if a whole year's deliveries are in a few months then it it will be the post popular for those few months but not overall and not for the whole year.
Electric cars make up 1% of all cars in Norway (something like ~25,000 vehicles out of ~2.5 million, not including trucks/vans/buses/etc) which is a lot compared to most countries but still a small amount.
I swear you must work for the NSA or some other three letter agency. Please don't come to my house and rape me. Down with China! Up with the West! Um... nukes bad and scary! Mall bombs bad and scary! I promise I won't ever demonstrate outside of a "free speech" zone or without a permit. I'm a good citizen!
I'm sorry for the ad hominem but your only valid argument against preferring a foreign government spying on you, Average Joe, to your own government was the identity theft risk and that seems worth it to me. The rest of your points are frivolous. It doesn't matter if China is a modern Nazi Germany -- the other countries still aren't paragons of excellence either.
Browser Javascript is already limited in what it can do and access.
And in this case even if you had NoScript installed (which is different from turning Javascript off entirely in your browser) and the main Jamie Oliver website whitelisted you'd still have been protected because what the JS was doing was creating an iframe to another site and loading Flash/Silverlight/Java exploits inside of that.
And note that even with a compromised site where they were able to inject their own JS that they still had to rely on Flash/Silverlight/Java rather than just Javascript to download and run the trojan. So to answer your question: No, Javascript isn't really dangerous. Poorly written browser plugins are.
The war on drugs couldn't even be "won" and that had physical products with high costs and prison sentences. How does anyone possibly think they can stop information, right or wrong, on a system that is designed to facilitate moving information?
It's honestly a waste of time and humanity would be much better served spending the resources/time/money/man hours elsewhere.
The GP wasn't saying anything about racial slurs or straw man arguments and "Don't attack the messenger if you cannot refute the message" isn't straw man -- it's ad hominem.
In most religions the religion itself defines what behavior is allowed if you're an actual adherent and not just paying lip service to it and so it would very much so be important to many debates even without being the topic of the discussion. Just look at any american discussion of homosexual relationships. You have religion, which is a choice, (or at least religion influenced values) affecting the opinions of people with regards to sexual orientation which is probably not a choice. Though honestly I'm not sure religion is a choice given that there is some research that says that the religion condition is partially tied to genetics.
More on topic: This article seems a bit facile to me (maybe pointless would be a better word.) It might as well say "the way to stop wars would be for everyone to be nice to each other."
People shit talk and harass each other constantly -- online and off. Sometimes in jest, sometimes in anger, sometimes in affection. Shaming people who do any of that to females should also need to shame anyone who does that to anyone and I just don't see that happening. In my opinion the line between offensive harassment and normal behavior is too blurry for it to happen. And I'm not sure if 'shame' is really a healthy tactic culturally.
The best we can do is to try to be the best people we can be and try to influence our kids to not be dicks and hope they become better people than we are.
The definition of male and female can get rather murky when you really start looking at the variety of people out there. There's a reason that the olympics uses testosterone levels and not whatever sexual organs you may (or may not) have.
Granted the pool of astronauts is a lot smaller so it probably doesn't matter that much but it would suck to be that one small 'male' astronaut with a low metabolic rate that wasn't even considered because the astronaut shows up in a database as having a penis.
The worst part is when the repair guy can't even figure out what the problem is.
You would think in a modern world that it would be pretty simple to add some relatively inexpensive sensors to help with diagnostics. I saw one slashdotter replied with a 3rd party vendor for that but I imagine it also comes with a silly monthly fee for monitoring.
I'd mostly be interested in using a smart thermostat for logging. If I can detect HVAC performance problems just once before they lead to a dead system on a deadly hot summer day and an emergency call to a repair guy then it would easily have paid for itself in comfort.
As a developer if you use 3rd party javascript libs (like jquery) it can be really smart to use a popular CDN instead of locally hosting because it decreases load time as it's likely already in the user's cache. Of course it's also smart to load a backup locally hosted version if the CDN version fails.
Given that it can only be transferred through bodily fluid I don't think it's really that big of a risk to treat patients in the states. We have isolation wards for a reason.
My impression is that the whole reason it's even spreading in Africa is because of the culture there -- people don't trust the doctors and bad burial practices and lots of ignorance and superstition.
Skype already leaks your IP anyway (both to active callers and to anyone that requests it as long as they know your username.) It's common knowledge in live streaming that you should hide your skype username when streaming to prevent DoS attacks.
Yeah, median would probably be a better 'average' but I think a heat map in general would be better.
And interestingly enough the map looks very similar to a median household income map. It doesn't show maximum available internet speeds per area or something more interesting like price per megabit in an area.
To me it just shows that poor and/or rural people tend to have slower internet speeds. Big surprise.
Japan seemed to work out alright; South Korea did too. Puerto Rico almost became a state, could still. California and Texas became states though I'm not sure they'd qualify as occupations.
Mexico could be doing better but I wouldn't count it as a hostile nation. I don't think the Philippines is hostile.
More recently Serbia is almost an EU member. I guess there hasn't been as good of a track record post-WW2 given Vietnam and the various Middle Eastern wars. Mostly the US seems to fail at converting strong communist(?) or Islamic countries into friendly nations.
The USA arguably wouldn't exist if the French, the Spanish, and the Dutch hadn't helped out in the American Revolution.
American interventionism has had a lot of failures but interventionism as a policy doesn't always turn out poorly.
Consider how different history would be if everyone subscribed to the "let asian boys handle asian problems" mentality. I don't think it would be a change for the better.
I agree that people have a legitimate, reasonable right to have their private lives kept private. I don't agree that public information on the internet that is indexed by Google constitutes private information.
I can see a situation where someone illegally put your private information on the internet and you send a C&D and then get a court to order that website to remove that information and they comply and THEN you ask Google to remove it from search results (assuming it doesn't automatically get removed the next time the index is updated.) Maybe the website is in a different country and doesn't comply and you want Google to take it down. Then maybe I could understand an argument for a process to remove private information from Google.
But if you post naked pictures of yourself on a forum or advocate cannibalism on twitter then tough luck. That's no longer private information as you just published it to the world. It's not like removing the information from their index without removing it from an actual website is going to make the information 'private' again.
Voters end up with the exact same number of choices in the general election: two.
The party system itself is the issue there -- not open or closed primaries. The way to give more choices would be to do away with "primaries" and have every candidate on the general election ballot and have runoffs or a different method of voting (like a ranked system).
Or maybe he's just REALLY angry after being in prison for two years? Can you even imagine yourself in an American prison for that long and what that might do to you?
Not that it validates anything he says but I wouldn't call him a douche based on that little bit of information. He's probably a douche for all of the trolling he's done before now though.
In general ISPs didn't ever have unlimited. They advertised unlimited and then knocked people off if they passed some secret unpublished limit.
The difference now is that they no longer advertise a lie and they have published and trackable limits. The only issue is that the limits are in many cases absurdly low but otherwise it's a better practice than what they were doing before.
Slashdot Mirror
If you can't bear to kill your 'criminal' by ripping off their heads with a rope tied to the back of a F100 you're just putting lipstick on a pig and calling it pretty.
I strongly disagree with this sentiment. Even if you're against capital punishment you can still recognize the reality of the current situation and desire a better form of execution.
It's quite simple, if you yourself were to be executed which method would you think is more humane? CO2 buildup is an extremely painful way to die, not just merely "aesthetics." CO poisoning is as well.
In studies (google for them), nitrogen (or another inert gas) has been shown to be one of the most humane ways to kill any mammal.
I, in fact, hope this sets a precedent and that states move to nitrogen gas as the primary method of execution. At least then the innocent people we kill wouldn't have to suffer while it's done.
While I'm pretty sure you're mocking the GP I thought someone might actually want that information.
The summary: http://www.fcc.gov/document/fc...
I think the rules are here (but a fourth of it is commentary): http://transition.fcc.gov/Dail...
I think this is the related "title II" stuff so you can see what portions they picked to apply: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
I find it weird that I couldn't actually find that chapter on ecfr.gov but oh well.
I agree with you but the the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act opt-out "fee" is not a fee and is instead a tax penalty with no teeth (the worst they can do is take it out of an income tax refund.) And it allows exemptions for various reasons.
So it's really only a fee/burden on healthy people who make decent income and don't want to get health insurance and subsidize others. Anyone who is poor and who can't actually afford insurance (even with subsidies) is either exempt or just wouldn't bother to pay $95.
I really enjoy when the current generation uses "feels" as a plural noun.
They think it's cute. :(
I'd just like to note that while electric cars are doing well in Norway I believe that Teslas are not the most popular cars in Noway.
I found the statement surprising and was hoping it was true but the claim seemed to be from news articles with cherry picked statistics over a short time period -- supposedly when batch orders were being delivered. Basically if a whole year's deliveries are in a few months then it it will be the post popular for those few months but not overall and not for the whole year.
Electric cars make up 1% of all cars in Norway (something like ~25,000 vehicles out of ~2.5 million, not including trucks/vans/buses/etc) which is a lot compared to most countries but still a small amount.
I swear you must work for the NSA or some other three letter agency. Please don't come to my house and rape me.
Down with China! Up with the West! Um... nukes bad and scary! Mall bombs bad and scary!
I promise I won't ever demonstrate outside of a "free speech" zone or without a permit. I'm a good citizen!
I'm sorry for the ad hominem but your only valid argument against preferring a foreign government spying on you, Average Joe, to your own government was the identity theft risk and that seems worth it to me.
The rest of your points are frivolous. It doesn't matter if China is a modern Nazi Germany -- the other countries still aren't paragons of excellence either.
Browser Javascript is already limited in what it can do and access.
And in this case even if you had NoScript installed (which is different from turning Javascript off entirely in your browser) and the main Jamie Oliver website whitelisted you'd still have been protected because what the JS was doing was creating an iframe to another site and loading Flash/Silverlight/Java exploits inside of that.
And note that even with a compromised site where they were able to inject their own JS that they still had to rely on Flash/Silverlight/Java rather than just Javascript to download and run the trojan.
So to answer your question: No, Javascript isn't really dangerous. Poorly written browser plugins are.
The "battle" was lost a long time ago.
The war on drugs couldn't even be "won" and that had physical products with high costs and prison sentences.
How does anyone possibly think they can stop information, right or wrong, on a system that is designed to facilitate moving information?
It's honestly a waste of time and humanity would be much better served spending the resources/time/money/man hours elsewhere.
Honestly it seems like we're trying to solve an energy storage problem with more energy production.
Maybe we need to do more research into large scale energy storage solutions?
The GP wasn't saying anything about racial slurs or straw man arguments and "Don't attack the messenger if you cannot refute the message" isn't straw man -- it's ad hominem.
In most religions the religion itself defines what behavior is allowed if you're an actual adherent and not just paying lip service to it and so it would very much so be important to many debates even without being the topic of the discussion.
Just look at any american discussion of homosexual relationships. You have religion, which is a choice, (or at least religion influenced values) affecting the opinions of people with regards to sexual orientation which is probably not a choice.
Though honestly I'm not sure religion is a choice given that there is some research that says that the religion condition is partially tied to genetics.
More on topic: This article seems a bit facile to me (maybe pointless would be a better word.)
It might as well say "the way to stop wars would be for everyone to be nice to each other."
People shit talk and harass each other constantly -- online and off. Sometimes in jest, sometimes in anger, sometimes in affection.
Shaming people who do any of that to females should also need to shame anyone who does that to anyone and I just don't see that happening.
In my opinion the line between offensive harassment and normal behavior is too blurry for it to happen. And I'm not sure if 'shame' is really a healthy tactic culturally.
The best we can do is to try to be the best people we can be and try to influence our kids to not be dicks and hope they become better people than we are.
The definition of male and female can get rather murky when you really start looking at the variety of people out there.
There's a reason that the olympics uses testosterone levels and not whatever sexual organs you may (or may not) have.
Granted the pool of astronauts is a lot smaller so it probably doesn't matter that much but it would suck to be that one small 'male' astronaut with a low metabolic rate that wasn't even considered because the astronaut shows up in a database as having a penis.
The worst part is when the repair guy can't even figure out what the problem is.
You would think in a modern world that it would be pretty simple to add some relatively inexpensive sensors to help with diagnostics.
I saw one slashdotter replied with a 3rd party vendor for that but I imagine it also comes with a silly monthly fee for monitoring.
I'd mostly be interested in using a smart thermostat for logging.
If I can detect HVAC performance problems just once before they lead to a dead system on a deadly hot summer day and an emergency call to a repair guy then it would easily have paid for itself in comfort.
As a developer if you use 3rd party javascript libs (like jquery) it can be really smart to use a popular CDN instead of locally hosting because it decreases load time as it's likely already in the user's cache.
Of course it's also smart to load a backup locally hosted version if the CDN version fails.
Given that it can only be transferred through bodily fluid I don't think it's really that big of a risk to treat patients in the states. We have isolation wards for a reason.
My impression is that the whole reason it's even spreading in Africa is because of the culture there -- people don't trust the doctors and bad burial practices and lots of ignorance and superstition.
Skype already leaks your IP anyway (both to active callers and to anyone that requests it as long as they know your username.)
It's common knowledge in live streaming that you should hide your skype username when streaming to prevent DoS attacks.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/201...
Or worst case scenario they could set up some sort of bird house program (away from the site) to encourage breeding to offset the numbers lost.
Yeah, median would probably be a better 'average' but I think a heat map in general would be better.
And interestingly enough the map looks very similar to a median household income map.
It doesn't show maximum available internet speeds per area or something more interesting like price per megabit in an area.
To me it just shows that poor and/or rural people tend to have slower internet speeds. Big surprise.
Japan seemed to work out alright; South Korea did too. Puerto Rico almost became a state, could still.
California and Texas became states though I'm not sure they'd qualify as occupations.
Mexico could be doing better but I wouldn't count it as a hostile nation.
I don't think the Philippines is hostile.
More recently Serbia is almost an EU member. I guess there hasn't been as good of a track record post-WW2 given Vietnam and the various Middle Eastern wars.
Mostly the US seems to fail at converting strong communist(?) or Islamic countries into friendly nations.
The USA arguably wouldn't exist if the French, the Spanish, and the Dutch hadn't helped out in the American Revolution.
American interventionism has had a lot of failures but interventionism as a policy doesn't always turn out poorly.
Consider how different history would be if everyone subscribed to the "let asian boys handle asian problems" mentality. I don't think it would be a change for the better.
I agree that people have a legitimate, reasonable right to have their private lives kept private.
I don't agree that public information on the internet that is indexed by Google constitutes private information.
I can see a situation where someone illegally put your private information on the internet and you send a C&D and then get a court to order that website to remove that information and they comply and THEN you ask Google to remove it from search results (assuming it doesn't automatically get removed the next time the index is updated.)
Maybe the website is in a different country and doesn't comply and you want Google to take it down.
Then maybe I could understand an argument for a process to remove private information from Google.
But if you post naked pictures of yourself on a forum or advocate cannibalism on twitter then tough luck. That's no longer private information as you just published it to the world.
It's not like removing the information from their index without removing it from an actual website is going to make the information 'private' again.
Voters end up with the exact same number of choices in the general election: two.
The party system itself is the issue there -- not open or closed primaries. The way to give more choices would be to do away with "primaries" and have every candidate on the general election ballot and have runoffs or a different method of voting (like a ranked system).
There are of course trade-offs for doing that.
Or maybe he's just REALLY angry after being in prison for two years?
Can you even imagine yourself in an American prison for that long and what that might do to you?
Not that it validates anything he says but I wouldn't call him a douche based on that little bit of information.
He's probably a douche for all of the trolling he's done before now though.
It's easier to reelect the evil that you know rather than risk the evil that you don't know.
Especially when the evil that you know has so much money and is so vocal about saying how much more evil the other guys are.
In general ISPs didn't ever have unlimited. They advertised unlimited and then knocked people off if they passed some secret unpublished limit.
The difference now is that they no longer advertise a lie and they have published and trackable limits. The only issue is that the limits are in many cases absurdly low but otherwise it's a better practice than what they were doing before.