SAS may be the best answer to "query huge amounts of data in sometimes rather odd ways". Using SQL Server for storage is fine, but not using anything else in front of it (SSAS is useless) is bringing a knife to a gun fight. Trying to do everything in a relational way means tying a hand and a foot behind your back. The real world doesn't neatly fit the model, hard as you might try to make it, so performance suffers greatly and doing unusual ad hoc things takes longer to figure out. Get SAS to send pure relational operations to the DBMS to do but perform other operations within. SAS's own SQL engine gives the user much more convenience since it supports SAS's functions and macro language, far richer than plain DBMS's, but I haven't found it to be particularly quick. In interoperability, SQL Server continues to improve, but SAS still works better with many more other applications. It has always been a best choice for moving data around. Organizations often choke on the licensing model, since most do "capital investments" every few years instead of paying a "licensing fee" every year (hefty, but does include some of the best support going). All this was about plain SAS. SAS/BI is really the product SAS will try to sell you to do what you describe; I haven't used it so can't rate it.
As far as those comments about writing code with SAS being "terrible", well, it can be inconsistent, but mostly those people have just never grasped the somewhat unique models it uses of handling observations. I find T-SQL to be seriously lacking for many tasks. If going all-MS, get VS and use a regular procedural language along with SQL Server.
When "scientists" discuss harsh facts that may have disastrous consequences, people think they're exaggerating, trying to be persuasive, and not being impartial.
Probably. I went back around age 45 to get a physics B.A. at a local state university with a small department so I could teach high school science (had 2 prior undergrad degrees in Econ and CS). I wasn't planning to do any astronomy or astrophysics, but I needed a few more hours, and the school had a 32" observatory, a Harvard-trained astrophysicist, and several interesting classes. The teaching gig afterwards didn't work out, but I'm so glad I studied astrophysics. Independent amateur researchers absolutely do contribute, but not very often in theoretical astrophysics. There's a LOT of original astronomy that can and is done by amateurs on smallish budgets. Learn a little nuclear physics and understand what's going on inside stars. Every week there's some new cool discovery in the news (a Thorne-Zytkow star found recently) and being able to comprehend what it's about is great. Many stars don't fit into neat categories, and those are the most interesting. You can use your programming skills in quite a few ways, if you're so inclined. Around here there's a community college with a small observatory run by students and a couple of committed teachers that hosts astronomy conferences and speakers. For some, it's a great opportunity to learn and contribute to the community. I have no idea how common such programs are. If you really want to spend time observing on your own, the DIY community is stronger than ever. Just as with other types of hacking, you could contribute by designing affordable, innovative DIY equipment made of common items. Like to travel? It's a good excuse to go looking for dark clear skies, and many places with dark skies are stunning in other ways. Heck, I'm thinking of taking a scope on a 21' boat to a dark isolated island. I won't discover anything but bugbites, but what a nice outing. Don't let the naysayers bother you, except for this: there probably aren't too many careers available. Keep your day job (literally). Oh, one more thing—don't restrict yourself to light. Radiotelescopy offers a lot of opportunities for amateurs as well, alone or in cooperation with others.
What did Cook not say? Did he bluntly say "we cannot read your mail"? Or did he just say "we don't have a key"? A general statement like "There is no way for us to read your mail or provide your mail to anyone else" would have more meaning. Reporters could ignore such statements, or at least every time they print one, point out how it could be misleading.
Suunto makes capable machines and I don't doubt this one works well. However, not all of us find the "big round" utilitarian look to our liking. Likewise, I respect Luminox, but I don't wear one for the same reason.
At some point in the future we'll either talk about how dorky people looked fumbling with their slab phones all the time (I always have) or just think of them like pocket watches—a machine put in use before it was miniaturized. I suspect that in the old days glancing at your wristwatch during meetings was tolerated a lot better than pulling out your pocket watch.
The Pebble is definitely more attractive than most others, certainly more than what the Apple looks like so far. Surely the fans will buy Apples, but I'm guessing Apple won't dominate the market or even lead the way this time. Until we have some kind of I/O that displays stuff in our eyes or brain without Glass and reads thoughts, seems like the wristwatch is the least intrusive, most convenient device.
I want features that have already appeared in watches: time display, stopwatch, alarm, tides for anywhere not dependent on downloading, barometer/altitude, compass, glow-in-the-dark, survivability from shock/EM fields/water/heat/cold, good styling (very few smart watches are much less than ugly), programmable remote control, good battery life, and durability, all in one. Add to that rudimentary navigation (only signals from GPS satellites necessary, and maybe not even that), Bluetooth, an accelerometer, and a great programming environment for those not wanting the hassle of a ridiculous tool chain.
A fatter version should have something like FindMeSpot functionality—SMS to satellites.
City and school buses are the perfect target for hybrid ICE/Electric propulsion (along with FedEx and UPS delivery trucks). They accelerate and decelerate a huge mass every block or so. Recapture as much of the energy as you can while slowing to speed up again. The power of the ICE needn't be anywhere close to what it is currently. Maybe not even electric—some mechanical means of storing energy for short periods would be helpful, and probably a lot cheaper. Just DO SOMETHING to avoid throwing away all that energy put into accelerating every block.
Since there's already a lot of experience using CNG for buses, use that and avoid much of the complicated emissions-control equipment. Buses are so big that putting a reformer on board and fueling them with methane but powering them with fuel cells might be feasible.
There are low-tech means of capturing windpower at sea that certainly aren't as efficient as fabric sails but are cheap, reliable, low-maintenance, and work independently of direction of wind vs heading. To supplement other means of propulsion they can make a lot of sense. I agree that hoisting sails on cargo ships probably won't catch on.
Maybe, but people tend to pull coupons out of the automatic dispensers just to see another offered. I suspect some being happened by and was doing the same. As long as more keep popping out, they'll keep doing it.
Better yet, install them in a fixed reclining position to begin with. When might I want to sit up straight? If I'm eating a meal, and I can't remember the last time I had that on a plane (obviously I don't fly transcontinentally).
Which is what I'd hope to get out of this, something that can be done on a medium-sized or smaller farm. Or under my house, but for the explosion hazard. Decentralized bacon byproduct!
Yes. And if the frackers were required to incorporate the external costs, it would be more expensive still.
I take it you mean LPG liquefaction and liquid storage is cheaper/easier than LNG. CNG is certainly common and useful, just not very compact, even at 3,000 psi. LNG is arguably safer, however, as it's lighter than air, whereas a major LPG leak can leave a lot of gas at ground level. And LNG is cold enough to quench hot bullets if they penetrate the tank. LPG isn't particularly cold until you evaporate some of it.
Call your Rep if they're on the Judiciary Committee. Google the committee to find out who's on it. My Rep's staffer was unfamiliar with the bill. At least bring it to their attention. I've usually sent email. It hasn't gotten the attention that a voice phone call has. Be polite and firm and be ready to explain what the bill is.
After reading a number of comments, I see that many of them fall into either the "Amazon is evil" or "Publishers are evil" camps. Guess what? Just like politics, it comes down to choosing the lesser evil. Neither one works to serve consumers.
There's a lot of argument for more sellers. Fewer is almost always bad for consumers in the long run. But here's something else. Amazon won't sell some things for fear of attacks from special interest groups. Suppose you want to read something shunned by many. No other outlets but Amazon? Too bad. On the other hand, a small seller based in a garage in L.A. isn't going to give a flip about a special interest group in Texas.
An interesting case is Costco. They push suppliers hard, but they also concentrate on quality. In some areas, this works well. However, their definition of quality isn't everyone's. Quality to me means food with no transfat (not "0%", which is often a lie allowed by the FDA). Their idea is what the majority wants—that which tastes good. With only big box stores, there's no one to sell to the minority with different needs.
Nothing speaks to the few big guys driving out the small guys with variety more than hardware stores. Need a 3/4" to 1/2" barbed brass plumbing adapter? Forget it. It's not used in new construction or renovations, so they don't have it. But they have 50 different kinds of drills. I have two, a cordless and a hammer drill, and may never need another. Also, they tend to carry fewer brands that cover more items, even though the best maker of each item is different. Too bad. The makers that remain profitable are thusly the ones who expand their line until they're no longer very good at any one thing.
Some areas, like biology, change quickly enough to justify introducing new editions every few years. Others most certainly do not, and publishers only do that to obsolete the existing copies, creating a demand for new ones and hence supporting a higher price. Teachers can't require a book for which there may not be adequate supply, so anytime publishers change editions, teachers have to go along. What a racket.
So have two e-editions with two prices, one that comes out early with the hardbacks and includes something extra... an additional short story, visual media, lack of DRM, whatever, and one that comes out later with just the main text. Or... just drop the price of the ebook when the softback comes out.
Price elasticity of demand curves are just that—curves, so dropping the price below $9.99 doesn't mean revenue will continue to grow. However, I won't buy their claims until I see their curve, and I bet it supports that dropping the price to $8.99 or even $7.99 increases revenue even further.
How many think that paying ten dollars for something for which the marginal cost is nearly zero is rather absurd? Virtually free replication is something for which capitalism is not well suited, hence all the manufactured scarcity we see.
The Beginning? Absolutely not. Amazon may have a wider market and may play a big part in the popularization of it, but Shapeways has already done "the beginning" of mainstream 3D printing, so Amazon can't do that. Don't think it's the mainstream? Try checking out the types of people using it. Not just engineers, hobbyists, and avant-garde artists.
Slashdot Mirror
SAS may be the best answer to "query huge amounts of data in sometimes rather odd ways". Using SQL Server for storage is fine, but not using anything else in front of it (SSAS is useless) is bringing a knife to a gun fight. Trying to do everything in a relational way means tying a hand and a foot behind your back. The real world doesn't neatly fit the model, hard as you might try to make it, so performance suffers greatly and doing unusual ad hoc things takes longer to figure out. Get SAS to send pure relational operations to the DBMS to do but perform other operations within. SAS's own SQL engine gives the user much more convenience since it supports SAS's functions and macro language, far richer than plain DBMS's, but I haven't found it to be particularly quick. In interoperability, SQL Server continues to improve, but SAS still works better with many more other applications. It has always been a best choice for moving data around. Organizations often choke on the licensing model, since most do "capital investments" every few years instead of paying a "licensing fee" every year (hefty, but does include some of the best support going). All this was about plain SAS. SAS/BI is really the product SAS will try to sell you to do what you describe; I haven't used it so can't rate it.
As far as those comments about writing code with SAS being "terrible", well, it can be inconsistent, but mostly those people have just never grasped the somewhat unique models it uses of handling observations. I find T-SQL to be seriously lacking for many tasks. If going all-MS, get VS and use a regular procedural language along with SQL Server.
I think you'd have to go back at least to Gutenberg. Gave the power to individuals to create many copies in hours rather than single copies in years.
When "scientists" discuss harsh facts that may have disastrous consequences, people think they're exaggerating, trying to be persuasive, and not being impartial.
Probably. I went back around age 45 to get a physics B.A. at a local state university with a small department so I could teach high school science (had 2 prior undergrad degrees in Econ and CS). I wasn't planning to do any astronomy or astrophysics, but I needed a few more hours, and the school had a 32" observatory, a Harvard-trained astrophysicist, and several interesting classes. The teaching gig afterwards didn't work out, but I'm so glad I studied astrophysics. Independent amateur researchers absolutely do contribute, but not very often in theoretical astrophysics. There's a LOT of original astronomy that can and is done by amateurs on smallish budgets. Learn a little nuclear physics and understand what's going on inside stars. Every week there's some new cool discovery in the news (a Thorne-Zytkow star found recently) and being able to comprehend what it's about is great. Many stars don't fit into neat categories, and those are the most interesting. You can use your programming skills in quite a few ways, if you're so inclined. Around here there's a community college with a small observatory run by students and a couple of committed teachers that hosts astronomy conferences and speakers. For some, it's a great opportunity to learn and contribute to the community. I have no idea how common such programs are. If you really want to spend time observing on your own, the DIY community is stronger than ever. Just as with other types of hacking, you could contribute by designing affordable, innovative DIY equipment made of common items. Like to travel? It's a good excuse to go looking for dark clear skies, and many places with dark skies are stunning in other ways. Heck, I'm thinking of taking a scope on a 21' boat to a dark isolated island. I won't discover anything but bugbites, but what a nice outing. Don't let the naysayers bother you, except for this: there probably aren't too many careers available. Keep your day job (literally). Oh, one more thing—don't restrict yourself to light. Radiotelescopy offers a lot of opportunities for amateurs as well, alone or in cooperation with others.
What did Cook not say? Did he bluntly say "we cannot read your mail"? Or did he just say "we don't have a key"? A general statement like "There is no way for us to read your mail or provide your mail to anyone else" would have more meaning. Reporters could ignore such statements, or at least every time they print one, point out how it could be misleading.
I'd recommend starting by avoiding LCDs. Use something like color E-Ink—a low-power but high-contract display—and use it artfully.
Suunto makes capable machines and I don't doubt this one works well. However, not all of us find the "big round" utilitarian look to our liking. Likewise, I respect Luminox, but I don't wear one for the same reason.
At some point in the future we'll either talk about how dorky people looked fumbling with their slab phones all the time (I always have) or just think of them like pocket watches—a machine put in use before it was miniaturized. I suspect that in the old days glancing at your wristwatch during meetings was tolerated a lot better than pulling out your pocket watch.
The Pebble is definitely more attractive than most others, certainly more than what the Apple looks like so far. Surely the fans will buy Apples, but I'm guessing Apple won't dominate the market or even lead the way this time. Until we have some kind of I/O that displays stuff in our eyes or brain without Glass and reads thoughts, seems like the wristwatch is the least intrusive, most convenient device.
I want features that have already appeared in watches: time display, stopwatch, alarm, tides for anywhere not dependent on downloading, barometer/altitude, compass, glow-in-the-dark, survivability from shock/EM fields/water/heat/cold, good styling (very few smart watches are much less than ugly), programmable remote control, good battery life, and durability, all in one. Add to that rudimentary navigation (only signals from GPS satellites necessary, and maybe not even that), Bluetooth, an accelerometer, and a great programming environment for those not wanting the hassle of a ridiculous tool chain.
A fatter version should have something like FindMeSpot functionality—SMS to satellites.
Oh yeah, and a friendly price.
City and school buses are the perfect target for hybrid ICE/Electric propulsion (along with FedEx and UPS delivery trucks). They accelerate and decelerate a huge mass every block or so. Recapture as much of the energy as you can while slowing to speed up again. The power of the ICE needn't be anywhere close to what it is currently. Maybe not even electric—some mechanical means of storing energy for short periods would be helpful, and probably a lot cheaper. Just DO SOMETHING to avoid throwing away all that energy put into accelerating every block.
Since there's already a lot of experience using CNG for buses, use that and avoid much of the complicated emissions-control equipment. Buses are so big that putting a reformer on board and fueling them with methane but powering them with fuel cells might be feasible.
There are low-tech means of capturing windpower at sea that certainly aren't as efficient as fabric sails but are cheap, reliable, low-maintenance, and work independently of direction of wind vs heading. To supplement other means of propulsion they can make a lot of sense. I agree that hoisting sails on cargo ships probably won't catch on.
Maybe, but people tend to pull coupons out of the automatic dispensers just to see another offered. I suspect some being happened by and was doing the same. As long as more keep popping out, they'll keep doing it.
Competition in Europe isn't just between airlines. Serious passenger rail service in the US would do a world of good.
Better yet, install them in a fixed reclining position to begin with. When might I want to sit up straight? If I'm eating a meal, and I can't remember the last time I had that on a plane (obviously I don't fly transcontinentally).
Propane is heavier than di-nitrogen, hence they'll be ground-hugging and slower to dissipate.
Which is what I'd hope to get out of this, something that can be done on a medium-sized or smaller farm. Or under my house, but for the explosion hazard. Decentralized bacon byproduct!
Yes. And if the frackers were required to incorporate the external costs, it would be more expensive still.
I take it you mean LPG liquefaction and liquid storage is cheaper/easier than LNG. CNG is certainly common and useful, just not very compact, even at 3,000 psi. LNG is arguably safer, however, as it's lighter than air, whereas a major LPG leak can leave a lot of gas at ground level. And LNG is cold enough to quench hot bullets if they penetrate the tank. LPG isn't particularly cold until you evaporate some of it.
Call your Rep if they're on the Judiciary Committee. Google the committee to find out who's on it. My Rep's staffer was unfamiliar with the bill. At least bring it to their attention. I've usually sent email. It hasn't gotten the attention that a voice phone call has. Be polite and firm and be ready to explain what the bill is.
After reading a number of comments, I see that many of them fall into either the "Amazon is evil" or "Publishers are evil" camps. Guess what? Just like politics, it comes down to choosing the lesser evil. Neither one works to serve consumers.
There's a lot of argument for more sellers. Fewer is almost always bad for consumers in the long run. But here's something else. Amazon won't sell some things for fear of attacks from special interest groups. Suppose you want to read something shunned by many. No other outlets but Amazon? Too bad. On the other hand, a small seller based in a garage in L.A. isn't going to give a flip about a special interest group in Texas.
An interesting case is Costco. They push suppliers hard, but they also concentrate on quality. In some areas, this works well. However, their definition of quality isn't everyone's. Quality to me means food with no transfat (not "0%", which is often a lie allowed by the FDA). Their idea is what the majority wants—that which tastes good. With only big box stores, there's no one to sell to the minority with different needs.
Nothing speaks to the few big guys driving out the small guys with variety more than hardware stores. Need a 3/4" to 1/2" barbed brass plumbing adapter? Forget it. It's not used in new construction or renovations, so they don't have it. But they have 50 different kinds of drills. I have two, a cordless and a hammer drill, and may never need another. Also, they tend to carry fewer brands that cover more items, even though the best maker of each item is different. Too bad. The makers that remain profitable are thusly the ones who expand their line until they're no longer very good at any one thing.
Some areas, like biology, change quickly enough to justify introducing new editions every few years. Others most certainly do not, and publishers only do that to obsolete the existing copies, creating a demand for new ones and hence supporting a higher price. Teachers can't require a book for which there may not be adequate supply, so anytime publishers change editions, teachers have to go along. What a racket.
So have two e-editions with two prices, one that comes out early with the hardbacks and includes something extra... an additional short story, visual media, lack of DRM, whatever, and one that comes out later with just the main text. Or... just drop the price of the ebook when the softback comes out.
Price elasticity of demand curves are just that—curves, so dropping the price below $9.99 doesn't mean revenue will continue to grow. However, I won't buy their claims until I see their curve, and I bet it supports that dropping the price to $8.99 or even $7.99 increases revenue even further.
How many think that paying ten dollars for something for which the marginal cost is nearly zero is rather absurd? Virtually free replication is something for which capitalism is not well suited, hence all the manufactured scarcity we see.
The Beginning? Absolutely not. Amazon may have a wider market and may play a big part in the popularization of it, but Shapeways has already done "the beginning" of mainstream 3D printing, so Amazon can't do that. Don't think it's the mainstream? Try checking out the types of people using it. Not just engineers, hobbyists, and avant-garde artists.