"tyranny coupled with the lack of economic development is going to end in revolution. It's inevitable."
So what? Dictators are not most sane and/or reasonable lot.
"at some point the cost of revolution that I mentioned above will be seen in the eyes of the man on the street as less than the cost of allowing the regime to persist."
Like in Tunisia, Egypt and most dramatically Libya. Other examples seem to be destined to failure.
"I should be able to do anything I want to do to it. "
Unfortunately, being drug addict WILL bring harm to persons other than yourself. So bad argument.
With sousveillance, police have nothing to hide before you! And no, it is not soviet russia, only "most free nation in the world"... excuse me, I must go puke.
Sousveillance should be right of everyone. I think it will be only when ubiquitouness of recording devices will make completely impossible to enforce destroying devidence of power abuse anyway.
China will not change any time soon. They are, as for now, able to give bread and circus. As long as they can dope in this way proverbial unwashed masses, they can sleep sound and safe.
In other words, this research would help us, not corporations. And this was destroyed, not some dark strain in corporate experimental lab. Well, since when ecoloonies and neoluddists have any logic?
"I don't see anyone forcing anyone to buy anything."
Yes, they force. Now what? Do you admit this is problem? I do not see problem with GMO, but I see big problems with corporations involved in this. Like suing thrid parties for their own faults, making harder informed consumer choice (GMO should be marked as such) and other typical corporate fascism.
"If a species does not actually contribute anything, why save it?"
Seems you have miraclous way to know what exactly each species contribute to ecosystem. And by the way, I really doubt low thousand species would be enough for survive of entire Earth biosphere. Good luck with that, corporate drone.
"Monsanto has every right to sue you for not following the terms of a license you never agreed to."
And I thought "Corporate Fascist America" is just leftist degoratory term. Seems like in few decades it will be factual description of USA.
Why? They as for now can deliver circus and bread and will be capable of this for any predictable future. Just that.
"tyranny coupled with the lack of economic development is going to end in revolution. It's inevitable."
So what? Dictators are not most sane and/or reasonable lot.
"at some point the cost of revolution that I mentioned above will be seen in the eyes of the man on the street as less than the cost of allowing the regime to persist."
Like in Tunisia, Egypt and most dramatically Libya. Other examples seem to be destined to failure.
Nah, China does just fine. Circus and bread. More like North Korea.
"They won't listen unless their wellbeing or money is threatened in a significant way."
When you will threaten them, you will bacome terrorist.
"I should be able to do anything I want to do to it. "
Unfortunately, being drug addict WILL bring harm to persons other than yourself. So bad argument.
"LulzSec tried to extort money from them while LulzSec claimed they offered the money to stop the hacking"
And it is not same thing because...?
Another retard that contributes to making "terrorist" word meaningless, or rather meaning "I do not like these people".
Hundreds, not thousands.
I think he formed this sentence in that way deliberately.
Oh, another police dog.
Wow, aren't you Internet Tough Guy. Pathetic.
With sousveillance, police have nothing to hide before you! And no, it is not soviet russia, only "most free nation in the world"... excuse me, I must go puke.
Sousveillance should be right of everyone. I think it will be only when ubiquitouness of recording devices will make completely impossible to enforce destroying devidence of power abuse anyway.
"checking any facts or do any digging on your own"
You mean conspiracy sites, argumentum ad YouTubium and similiar crap on internez?
Born blind and deaf? They are probably screwed.
China will not change any time soon. They are, as for now, able to give bread and circus. As long as they can dope in this way proverbial unwashed masses, they can sleep sound and safe.
Ever heard about thing called "genetic mutation"?
They have altered genes all the same, ecoloonie. Only difference is timescale.
Retarded analogy is retarded.
In other words, this research would help us, not corporations. And this was destroyed, not some dark strain in corporate experimental lab. Well, since when ecoloonies and neoluddists have any logic?
"Someone/something else does this too" is shittest excuse in existence.
"I don't see anyone forcing anyone to buy anything."
Yes, they force. Now what? Do you admit this is problem? I do not see problem with GMO, but I see big problems with corporations involved in this. Like suing thrid parties for their own faults, making harder informed consumer choice (GMO should be marked as such) and other typical corporate fascism.
"If a species does not actually contribute anything, why save it?"
Seems you have miraclous way to know what exactly each species contribute to ecosystem. And by the way, I really doubt low thousand species would be enough for survive of entire Earth biosphere. Good luck with that, corporate drone.
"Monsanto has every right to sue you for not following the terms of a license you never agreed to."
And I thought "Corporate Fascist America" is just leftist degoratory term. Seems like in few decades it will be factual description of USA.
Aren't you cute neoluddistic troll. Go back to your cave.