But it's not going to be empty, it's going to contain an older version of your OS which the system keeps around so it can update itself and boot from it in case the update fails.
No, men are considered to be responsible, both socially and legally, for the women and families they have, hence they will get higher paying jobs and more aggressively pursue promotions to better the life of their family and offspring. In most Western countries women cohabitating with men don't "need" to work.
I'm sure there are plenty of people that want to change those notions but being judgmental about those that choose to live that way is also wrong.
Those numbers are also largely overinflated. People like a place to put the blame, an infant that has recently died to SIDS after receiving a vaccination will be reported as caused by vaccination. Also consider that most that die or have adverse reactions to vaccination would have had the same reaction to the actual live virus.
The first engineer that comes to me with his feelings about a project and how we should empathize with his viewpoint will get summarily fired. Engineering is about what you can calculate, prove and do or not do. The rest just gets in the way of true engineers.
It's infringement from the GPLv2 point to even add those terms. They are adding terms to the GPLv2 license by modifying the code, and distributing the code with those new terms, that's breach of contract from GRSecurity's contract with the Linux community.
The GPLv2 explicitly tells you you cannot change the terms: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
Even so, regardless of the facts on the matter, Bruce is entitled to his opinion, even if he ends up being wrong. GRSecurity just shot themselves again in the other foot with this.
It's not quite that easy. It's why stations used to be built with resistor banks the size of a house to "burn" excess production.
Stopping a turbine costs brakes and with too high wind speeds you just can't without breaking something. Solar cells will destroy themselves if they are left in large arrays without a load, suddenly stopping the flow to a turbine will likewise destroy it due to its inertia.
Steam turbines are probably the simplest to stop although the reactor will take a lot of time to adjust and get somewhat hot, it's designed to be able to handle a disastrous disconnect from the net.
It's made it easier but as a buyer you were guaranteed to always get a refund, if you didn't want to wait on the seller to answer, you could actually call Amazon for an instant refund.
If sellers don't like it, they can go back to eBay and compete worldwide with Chinese manufacturers, Amazon articles almost always have a much higher markup compared to other markets, partly to cover their refund and shipping policies.
There are and you can (at least for Apple). I once wrote my own Apple update server since we moved away from Apple hardware for servers. All you do is download an XML, parse it and download the URL's that it's telling you to download. Then make them available with Apache or nginx.
Not sure about Windows, from what I understand you need Windows Server ($500-6000) and then set up WSUS and then have an Active Directory. Ever seen the WSUS interface? It's absolutely horrid and the organization of updates makes no sense.
The problem remains that most applications, regardless of how you order them are held by a small set of companies and these companies aren't going to be bidding against themselves.
Best thing to do is have an open job search market system where you only accept applications from individuals which have at least an accredited Masters degree and above and you have to pay at least 125% of the average wages for that position.
According to the sales people, it is, the costs to get into these things are huge though, not for your average business. The data feeds alone are hundreds of thousands per year and require nearly a datacenter but they can get you whatever sales info you want but they nicely tie together Social Media and Credit Card Transactions with Location Data.
It depends. Sure you can't replace a DSLR for professional studio work but many professional photographers now depend on phones (especially the iPhone) for places where a $2k purse of heavy gear would be a significant issue (think urban, war and nature photography), even short movies have been shot entirely on phone devices.
Phones are small, portable, are connected to unlimited storage capacity and have a sensor as good as many DSLR, even though it doesn't have the optics.
Exactly. There are a number of companies now offering not just your credit card data but which ads subgroups of people look online, what they buy in the real world and together with location data shared from cell phone apps and ad beacons, together with gaze tracking, even what real world ads they view and paths they take in places like malls.
In this administration? Not really. Changes seem to be afoot every day and most of these are political appointments. People who do the actual work don't get their announcement.
The penny pinching most likely doesn't happen on Apple's side but on the architect/project manager side that promoted it in the first place. The brass doesn't care about details like that, the middle managers see the project and will put "saved $50M" on their resume and by the time anyone picks up on it, the project is already halfway done and changing it would cost more than double.
You can't imagine how penny-pinching general contractors and architects are, not because the clients wants it, but because margins on cheap/open office spaces are so much higher than expensive office spaces. You can still charge the client the same amount of money for things like "design" but not have to worry about all the fire sprinklers on the plan, you just have to roll out some carpet instead of cutting around edges and either way gets charged per square foot. The only people not happy about it would be painters.
That's exactly what I'm trying to say, the problem is not about security in the network, we have really good security systems available to anyone, it's higher up (where the software sits) and sometimes better solutions to these problems are actually in "the real world".
What are you going to do when people continue throwing bots at you? You can usually filter/block/firewall your way out of it but if they create true economic distress, you arrest them. It's like someone throwing feces at you in public, you can pick up a shield, but right now the governments prefer that you pick up a shield with holes so they know where you've walked based on the feces on your body, you can make a better shield, fairly complete ones exist, but the problem isn't the shields, it's the idiots throwing feces at you.
You don't have to "know" everything about a person in order to make them accountable, especially not on the Internet, it's how Bitcoin works.
There is also no need to punish anyone for what they do on the Internet, anything "bad" that can be done on the Internet is easily resolved by some form of censorship whether it's firewalling, blocking or removing the content.
The main reason why this idea won't float is because the Internet or it's protocols inherently aren't broken. Sure there is a lot of old cruft in eg. TCP/IP or FTP but modern implementations scale very well and can be done securely.
The main "problem" with the Internet sits not between Layer 1 and Layer 5, it sits with Layer 6 and 7, and most of the trouble there is owned by Microsoft and to a lesser extent Google & co (ad companies) and a bunch of shovelware (both in hardware and software) vendors. Moving to another network of any kind will not resolve it since anyone will be able to couple the two networks and it still doesn't resolve the layers causing trouble.
They should release the source code just to make sure that everyone sees how NOT to create an abomination like that again, also, if you do, hopefully an ultra-intelligent AI will pick up on it, try to make it work and we'll save the human race.
Also, that bro-ski from ZDNet doesn't know what it's talking about. Flex is not Flash, Flex is a developer tool to make Flash applications. It requires Flash (the closed source plugin) to run the things that come out of Flex.
Slashdot Mirror
No they exist, if you don't see it it means you're part of it.
But it is imaginary. It's just not to you because it fits in your narrative.
So then why aren't they firing the bullies that think other employees have no right to speak up?
But it's not going to be empty, it's going to contain an older version of your OS which the system keeps around so it can update itself and boot from it in case the update fails.
No, men are considered to be responsible, both socially and legally, for the women and families they have, hence they will get higher paying jobs and more aggressively pursue promotions to better the life of their family and offspring. In most Western countries women cohabitating with men don't "need" to work.
I'm sure there are plenty of people that want to change those notions but being judgmental about those that choose to live that way is also wrong.
Those numbers are also largely overinflated. People like a place to put the blame, an infant that has recently died to SIDS after receiving a vaccination will be reported as caused by vaccination. Also consider that most that die or have adverse reactions to vaccination would have had the same reaction to the actual live virus.
The first engineer that comes to me with his feelings about a project and how we should empathize with his viewpoint will get summarily fired. Engineering is about what you can calculate, prove and do or not do. The rest just gets in the way of true engineers.
It's infringement from the GPLv2 point to even add those terms. They are adding terms to the GPLv2 license by modifying the code, and distributing the code with those new terms, that's breach of contract from GRSecurity's contract with the Linux community.
The GPLv2 explicitly tells you you cannot change the terms:
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
Even so, regardless of the facts on the matter, Bruce is entitled to his opinion, even if he ends up being wrong. GRSecurity just shot themselves again in the other foot with this.
Yet, since those generally have been defended well enough, you can't just go claiming you sell kleenexes or tivos.
It's not quite that easy. It's why stations used to be built with resistor banks the size of a house to "burn" excess production.
Stopping a turbine costs brakes and with too high wind speeds you just can't without breaking something. Solar cells will destroy themselves if they are left in large arrays without a load, suddenly stopping the flow to a turbine will likewise destroy it due to its inertia.
Steam turbines are probably the simplest to stop although the reactor will take a lot of time to adjust and get somewhat hot, it's designed to be able to handle a disastrous disconnect from the net.
It's made it easier but as a buyer you were guaranteed to always get a refund, if you didn't want to wait on the seller to answer, you could actually call Amazon for an instant refund.
If sellers don't like it, they can go back to eBay and compete worldwide with Chinese manufacturers, Amazon articles almost always have a much higher markup compared to other markets, partly to cover their refund and shipping policies.
As the summary states, previous administrations simply didn't allow them to collect the data.
There are and you can (at least for Apple). I once wrote my own Apple update server since we moved away from Apple hardware for servers. All you do is download an XML, parse it and download the URL's that it's telling you to download. Then make them available with Apache or nginx.
Not sure about Windows, from what I understand you need Windows Server ($500-6000) and then set up WSUS and then have an Active Directory. Ever seen the WSUS interface? It's absolutely horrid and the organization of updates makes no sense.
The problem remains that most applications, regardless of how you order them are held by a small set of companies and these companies aren't going to be bidding against themselves.
Best thing to do is have an open job search market system where you only accept applications from individuals which have at least an accredited Masters degree and above and you have to pay at least 125% of the average wages for that position.
According to the sales people, it is, the costs to get into these things are huge though, not for your average business. The data feeds alone are hundreds of thousands per year and require nearly a datacenter but they can get you whatever sales info you want but they nicely tie together Social Media and Credit Card Transactions with Location Data.
It depends. Sure you can't replace a DSLR for professional studio work but many professional photographers now depend on phones (especially the iPhone) for places where a $2k purse of heavy gear would be a significant issue (think urban, war and nature photography), even short movies have been shot entirely on phone devices.
Phones are small, portable, are connected to unlimited storage capacity and have a sensor as good as many DSLR, even though it doesn't have the optics.
Exactly. There are a number of companies now offering not just your credit card data but which ads subgroups of people look online, what they buy in the real world and together with location data shared from cell phone apps and ad beacons, together with gaze tracking, even what real world ads they view and paths they take in places like malls.
In this administration? Not really. Changes seem to be afoot every day and most of these are political appointments. People who do the actual work don't get their announcement.
Yeah, anything else gets delayed by days, to the point we're getting year-old stories. But Trump fired someone "News for nerds, stuff that matters"?
The penny pinching most likely doesn't happen on Apple's side but on the architect/project manager side that promoted it in the first place. The brass doesn't care about details like that, the middle managers see the project and will put "saved $50M" on their resume and by the time anyone picks up on it, the project is already halfway done and changing it would cost more than double.
You can't imagine how penny-pinching general contractors and architects are, not because the clients wants it, but because margins on cheap/open office spaces are so much higher than expensive office spaces. You can still charge the client the same amount of money for things like "design" but not have to worry about all the fire sprinklers on the plan, you just have to roll out some carpet instead of cutting around edges and either way gets charged per square foot. The only people not happy about it would be painters.
That's exactly what I'm trying to say, the problem is not about security in the network, we have really good security systems available to anyone, it's higher up (where the software sits) and sometimes better solutions to these problems are actually in "the real world".
What are you going to do when people continue throwing bots at you? You can usually filter/block/firewall your way out of it but if they create true economic distress, you arrest them. It's like someone throwing feces at you in public, you can pick up a shield, but right now the governments prefer that you pick up a shield with holes so they know where you've walked based on the feces on your body, you can make a better shield, fairly complete ones exist, but the problem isn't the shields, it's the idiots throwing feces at you.
You don't have to "know" everything about a person in order to make them accountable, especially not on the Internet, it's how Bitcoin works.
There is also no need to punish anyone for what they do on the Internet, anything "bad" that can be done on the Internet is easily resolved by some form of censorship whether it's firewalling, blocking or removing the content.
The main reason why this idea won't float is because the Internet or it's protocols inherently aren't broken. Sure there is a lot of old cruft in eg. TCP/IP or FTP but modern implementations scale very well and can be done securely.
The main "problem" with the Internet sits not between Layer 1 and Layer 5, it sits with Layer 6 and 7, and most of the trouble there is owned by Microsoft and to a lesser extent Google & co (ad companies) and a bunch of shovelware (both in hardware and software) vendors. Moving to another network of any kind will not resolve it since anyone will be able to couple the two networks and it still doesn't resolve the layers causing trouble.
They should release the source code just to make sure that everyone sees how NOT to create an abomination like that again, also, if you do, hopefully an ultra-intelligent AI will pick up on it, try to make it work and we'll save the human race.
Also, that bro-ski from ZDNet doesn't know what it's talking about. Flex is not Flash, Flex is a developer tool to make Flash applications. It requires Flash (the closed source plugin) to run the things that come out of Flex.
Only if python3/4 was backwards compatible with python2 this wouldn't be a problem. Python is the systemd of programming languages.