Slashdot Mirror


New Data On H-1B Visas Prove That IT Outsourcers Hire a Lot But Pay Very Little (qz.com)

New submitter FerociousFerret shares a report from Quartz: Hard numbers have been released by the U.S. government agency that screens visas for high-skilled foreign workers, and they are not pretty. Data made available by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for the first time show that the widely made complaint about the visa program is true: a small number of IT outsourcing companies get a disproportionately high number of H-1B visas and pay below-average wages to their workers. The new data also gives a more accurate picture of salaries of H-1B workers by employer. The top IT outsourcing companies on average paid much lower salaries to their workers. The wage divide is largely a result of different education requirements of H-1B positions. H-1B visas are issued to workers with specialized skills which generally requires a Bachelor's degree or higher. More than 98% of approved H-1B visa positions were awarded to workers with either a Bachelor's or a Master's degree in fiscal year 2016. A closer look at the educations held by H-1B workers at companies like Google, Amazon and Intel -- places with in-house tech staffs -- show that more than 60% had Masters degrees. For most IT outsourcing companies, the majority of H-1B visa holders only had a Bachelor's.

233 comments

  1. "...they are not pretty." by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    beauty is in the eye of the employer

    1. Re:"...they are not pretty." by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Since when are IT employees hired for their looks?

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    2. Re:"...they are not pretty." by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      Since when are IT employees hired for their looks?

      Let me guess, all that practise reading the various Cisco switch manuals in German front-to-back came in handy at your job interview.

    3. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since IT employees are not hired for their looks, why do IT employers insist upon Skype interviews?

    4. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boot mit Zystem-D

    5. Re:"...they are not pretty." by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since when are IT employees hired for their looks?

      Since, well, this prospect looks like he'll work more hours for less pay... beauty.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 3

      Since IT employees are not hired for their looks, why do IT employers insist upon Skype interviews?

      I can't speak for others, but I insist on video screening interviews so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

    7. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's the same basic reason I'll have a few beers with my brother via video chat, but almost never talk to him on the phone - a great deal of information is conveyed via nonverbal communication.

      And when you're trying to distinguish between potentially good employees, and good liars, every little bit helps.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Reverend+Green · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends what they're looking up. Sometimes knowing how to find an answer efficiently is more important than memorizing random tech trivia.

    9. Re: "...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes knowing how to find an answer efficiently is more important than memorizing random tech trivia.

      Actual knowledge is usually required to understand something. If you look something up, it doesn't mean you understand it, including understanding why or why not..
      I generally want to hire people who can not only answer and address problems by copy and paste, but will ask why more often than how, because they are subject matter experts with actual understanding.
      How to use locks or threads is child's play. Understanding when and when not, and being able to troubleshoot them in a non-standard environment requires knowledge residing in your own brain, not stackexchange.

    10. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why don't you just admit you want to judge the applicants on appearance and mannerism and sociability but you're too cheap to arrange face-to-face auditions.

      What you really want are actors who will look right into the camera and lie to you convincingly.

    11. Re: "...they are not pretty." by red+crab · · Score: 2

      And you do think that one can come up with a convincing answer on when to use locks and threads by looking it up on the stackexchange while on a voice call? If you are asking open-ended, conceptual questions then it doesn't really matter whether the candidate is on a voice call, video call or face-to-face IMO.

    12. Re:"...they are not pretty." by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Since IT employees are not hired for their looks, why do IT employers insist upon Skype interviews?

      I can't speak for others, but I insist on video screening interviews so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

      What, you don't want you employees to use initiative?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      appearance and mannerism and sociability

      You say these things as if they aren't an important factor in whether a prospect is likely to be a good fit in your various teams. Even for full remote ones ability to communicate and interact are incredibly important factors.

    14. Re:"...they are not pretty." by mysidia · · Score: 1

      so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

      If they want to cheat, they could have a hidden microphone with a friend listening in on the interview; Googling the questions, and displaying the answers on their computer monitor while they're skyping and appearing to just be watching the video chat.

    15. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If they want to cheat, they could have a hidden microphone with a friend listening in on the interview; Googling the questions, and displaying the answers on their computer monitor while they're skyping and appearing to just be watching the video chat.

      You can tell by people's eyes whether they're reading or not.

    16. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to use locks or threads is child's play.

      Said by no one that _actually_ understands parallel or distributed computation, ever.

    17. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since IT employees are not hired for their looks, why do IT employers insist upon Skype interviews?

      I can't speak for others, but I insist on video screening interviews so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

      And secretly collect information about how they will fill your "diversity" quota (your hiring practices are racist) and make sure they aren't too old (your hiring practices are also age discriminatory.) Sometimes you can even pick up if they are a swisher or "other" so you can have someone who lets your HR progressiveist nazi feel better about themselves.

    18. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 1

      What, you don't want you employees to use initiative?

      Sure, if they're open about it. "I don't know, but let me show you how quickly I can find out" is showing initiative.
      Trying to pull wool over the interviewer's eyes is not showing initiative in a way that would be an asset to my company. Even minor attempts at deceit is an automatic "thanks for the interview; we will contact you if needed", and a note of "do not interview in the future", no matter how perfect other qualifications are.

    19. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 0

      make sure they aren't too old (your hiring practices are also age discriminatory.)

      The latest person I got hired was in his 60s. Based on a video interview. Try again.

    20. Re:"...they are not pretty." by ebh · · Score: 1

      We started doing that after we hired someone based on a phone interview, and he turned out not to be able to do the job at all. An identical-sounding impostor had done the phone interview for him.

    21. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at a high level, how to use them is easy. Allocate one, initialize it and put the lock and unlock/start thread/join thread calls. The syntax isn't particularly hard. Now the when to use them and where is the right place in code to use them, which I agree with you is still part of the "how", that's difficult.

    22. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Had this happen at the last place I worked. They did a phone interview for an H1-B candidate, he was still in India, and hired him based on his knowledge and presentation during the interview. The guy that showed up, based on voice and technical "expertise" was OBVIOUSLY not him. They kept him on anyhow due to the administrative costs of going through the visa process and made us, the rest of the team, cover for his inadequacies.

    23. Re:"...they are not pretty." by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If they want to cheat, they could have a hidden microphone with a friend listening in on the interview; Googling the questions, and displaying the answers on their computer monitor while they're skyping and appearing to just be watching the video chat.

      You can tell by people's eyes whether they're reading or not.

      I have this really neat old-skool tech that solves that problem. Earpiece.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    24. Re:"...they are not pretty." by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's the same basic reason I'll have a few beers with my brother via video chat, but almost never talk to him on the phone - a great deal of information is conveyed via nonverbal communication.

      And when you're trying to distinguish between potentially good employees, and good liars, every little bit helps.

      Depends. Are you looking for someone in management or sales or marketing? Then you want both.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    25. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The hard part is to code so you do not have to use locks. Let that simmer for a while.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    26. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because so many H-1B applicants use one person for the phone interview, then a different person actually comes into the office. Even with Skype interviews though it's even gotten to the point where the person in front of the webcam is not the person speaking.

    27. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while you both watch each other masterbate

    28. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you might be asking the wrong sort of questions. Open ended essay style questions are what I tend to use to avoid this sort of thing. I do use skype to interview for other reasons (making sure the person we interviewed is the one who shows up to the job mainly).

    29. Re: "...they are not pretty." by SScorpio · · Score: 2

      It lets the interviewer know who they are talking to. I've heard stories of Skype interviews where a different H1B Indian guy shows up after getting hired.

    30. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why I'm glad I switched from a theater major to computer science.

    31. Re:"...they are not pretty." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I read the German manual cover to cover, but I still can't find the IOS command to gas the Jews.

      You should have studied the IBM documentation, rather than Cisco.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for others, but I insist on video screening interviews so I can ask the applicants questions without them looking up answers in a search engine.

      Right. Hopefully that works well for you. Depending on what line of work it is, it very well might.

      In almost all interviews I do of applicants to various positions I turn them into discussions around topics where there is no way you would make a good impression by using Google.

      I don't want to know if the applicant knows how to spell [latest-fad-framework] or what the exact name of [feature-foo-in-library-bar-version-3.5] is.

      I want to know how the applicant thinks, on the spot, when given a reasonably complex topic they have never seen before.

      Complex enough to force them to think, and talk about along the way, but not complex enough as to stump them completely.

      There are no set "right" or "wrong" answers to these. But there is "good" and "bad" reasoning around them.

      This approach works very well for us.

    33. Re: "...they are not pretty." by ranton · · Score: 1

      The hard part is to code so you do not have to use locks. Let that simmer for a while.

      I'm not sure if time stamp based concurrency is inherently harder to implement than lock based. Both can be quite challenging.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    34. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video screening restricts half of the rural US.
      Have you ever tried to stream video at 384kbit on DSL?
      Some places have that as the only option.
      Audio should be sufficient and if you really need to see someone face-to-face, have them drive in.

      It doesn't really matter if they're looking up the answers.
      You're paying for problem solving, not memorization.
      If the problem can be solved by Google and copy/paste, you just saved a few hours.
      If your questions are so generic that Google already has the expected answers, write new questions.

    35. Re:"...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can tell by people's eyes whether they're reading or not.

      It really depends on the image quality.
      Have you seen what a fractal compression algorithm does with fast motion and low bandwidth?

      It can be terrible.

    36. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked with one that did the interviews for his buds.

    37. Re:"...they are not pretty." by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Video screening restricts half of the rural US.
      Have you ever tried to stream video at 384kbit on DSL?
      Some places have that as the only option.

      If an applicant cannot perform a useful video interview, i would never hold that against him or her, and we would try to accommodate in other ways, including longer screening interviews until we think we know enough. But a video interview can cut down on time. But yes, I have experienced cases where a phone interview had so bad quality that I asked whether we could switch to phone. (One of them was in a job recruiter's office, none the less. They had permanent "bandwidth issues" despite a fast line. Perhaps they should hire one of the "networking specialists" they wanted us to hire, but I digress...)

      You're paying for problem solving, not memorization.

      Not just problem solving, but problem finding and problem avoidance. That requires knowledge and understanding. You can be master of searches, but if you don't know what to search for, it doesn't help.

      In a phone/video screening interview, I cannot easily ask you to take a look at some code or schematics and tell what's wrong. But I can ask questions that reveal some of your knowledge in the area. If you don't seem to have any, or appear to be cheating, you won't get called in for an in person interview where better skill testing can be done. It's that simple. And Skype is a useful tool there. The good applicants get through the screening no problem, because if we advertise a job, it's because we do want it filled.

    38. Re: "...they are not pretty." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and to surreptitiously check their age, race, health, sex...without being easily caught by DoL sting operations.

    39. Re:"...they are not pretty." by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      While I generally agree with you, because I think it's important to be able to trust your employees, I think you'll have a difficult time finding anyone who hasn't been at least a little deceptive in an interview or elsewhere. 100% truth just doesn't happen. I hate being lied to, and take note of those I catch in it, but also realize that I'm being hypocritical because I'm also not always 100% honest. You don't even get that between spouses.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  2. Seriously? by technomom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is news? Companies wouldn't bother to even do H-1B visas unless they paid less than homegrown employees.

    1. Re:Seriously? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has 3 great wins in the USA.
      Removes unions.
      Staff have to work under threat of not been able to stay in the USA.
      Low costs.
      One person with needed legal standing in US can have a lot of new low cost workers working US services.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Seriously? by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a former H1B holder who was paid far more than the equivalent homegrown employees, I can tell you that you missed the point of the article.

      The point is that US companies that directly employ H1B holders pay more than the companies whose business is outsourcing.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While simultaneously replacing jobs that U.S. citizens might take.. after a computer-focused IT education provides them what they thought was the means to a career....

      Yet you fail to understand the "argument" that the United States is failing to provide qualified tech workers... even with years of STEM programs.

      So if they don't get the overworked-underpaid H1B temp employees they want and they for some reason can't find local talent... its time to ship jobs beyond our shores!

      Wait.. do I hear an echo from Disney-world?

      https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/us/last-task-after-layoff-at-disney-train-foreign-replacements.html

      California dreaming!

      http://www.computerworld.com/article/3117602/it-outsourcing/university-of-california-to-send-some-it-jobs-to-india.html

      This is corporate greed funded by legislation.. and nothing more.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Precisely.

      H1-B visas should only be granted to companies that are hiring the holder directly - no contracting companies should be allowed to sponsor H1-B holders.

      If the employer of the H1-B candidate had to treat them as an employee, we would see the higher wages. But since they are employed by contract houses, they get less money, the corporations get cheap foreign labor, and wages stay low.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Train the trainer, then send them back home with a promotion and pay cut as management.

    6. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is corporate greed funded by legislation.. and nothing more.

      This.
      I have said as much since I saw the first article claiming that the so-called leader of technology and the first world claimed that they did not have enough programmers, despite having the largest pool of programming talent in the world - silicon valley. Honestly, this excuse is like movie companies saying that there aren't enough actors in Hollywood to make a movie.
      An the fact that this has gone on with little lashback from the public over the last two years indicates just how much companies can demand and get what they want, whilst any individual complaints about the unfairness of the system will be swept under a rug.

    7. Re:Seriously? by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Which companies? Dedicated outsources, no doubt. But I'm a hiring manager in a tech company, and about 3/20 of my people are H1Bs. They get paid the same as the rest of my people (software engineers, in the $300K+ range). We don't look for H1Bs because we pay less.

    8. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1B program of the early 90's was a different beast. The H1B's from Europe were generally far better qualified, with a more focused education that put them 5 years ahead of student out of the US programs with supposedly similar qualifications, and got paid much better. They likely didn't waste a year on worthless general education that should have been covered in middle school.

      The Disney situation is appalling, and the program needs reforming back into a direct employment of high skilled individuals to augment rather than replace US talent. Filling body shops with mediocre and limited talent needs to be seriously culled.

    9. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Companies wouldn't bother to even do H-1B visas unless they paid less than homegrown employees.

      Sure, for the sleazy IT firms. For the big software companies that actually pay their H1B holders competitive salaries, they do it because not enough Americans get serious CS educations.

      The Big Four company I work for would never admit it, but they screen citizen applicants far less aggressively for developer positions than foreign-national applicants, and yet still hire foreign-nationals disproportionately because the Americans just can't cut it. Which is fine, I guess, except that the garbage IT firms abusing the visa system means that fewer and fewer of our talented, educated, and highly trained foreign workers are able to remain in the country when their existing visas expire.

    10. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it's sort of news because the companies say that they can't find enough domestic people, not that they cost more. that is what they say.

      many companies get .. well, shortshifted.

      you know how a western high school is? do you know how a typical non-japanese asian UNIVERSITY is? it's like a finnish high school with finnish elementary school stuff thrown in. attendance is the key to graduation.

    11. Re:Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This is corporate greed funded by legislation.. and nothing more.

      No, there are exceptions, where a person really is hired because there truly aren't anyone on the native market with the skill set. Those are few and far-between, but examples can include new technologies that haven't been introduced to the US before, so there is no local expertise, or old technologies where those who knew it are either already hired or dead. Try finding a competent Fortran programmer or certified horologist these days. Chances are you have to shop abroad.

    12. Re: Seriously? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Or you could just find a competent programmer who's willing to learn Fortran. Seriously, people get way too hung up on language experience. I guess it's a way to pigeonhole people and keep pay rates low.

      But seriously, any decent programmer can pick up a new language in a few weeks. And probably only half of the decent programmers have been pushed out of the industry So there's still a big pool of domestic labor to exploit.

    13. Re: Seriously? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Your situation is atypical.

    14. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Bigcorps don't even consider US citizen applicants. If your name is "Joe" instead of "Prajeet" you won't even get an interview, regardless of education and experience. And if your name is "Prajeet" but you were born & raised in New Jersey, you won't get an interview either.

    15. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's so atypical in the software industry it has bullshit all over it.

    16. Re: Seriously? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      it is easy to skill up in a language, it takes many months or years to be proficient with all the ins and outs of the language to get the best from it. When you are dealing with something critical the last thing you want is someone that has only just picked up the language.

    17. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really isn't Atypical. It is actually the normal, the numbers though are seriously skewed by a few bad eggs, namely the big outsourcers. Looking at the data from the article all the big non outsourer companies are actually paying the H1-B' employees very well.

    18. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picking up the language is easy; it's far more important to understand the logic behind the existing codebase, and the last thing you want is someone to jump in and make critical changes without knowing the code.

    19. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work for Google's Research and Machine Intelligence division with a Ph.D. in a very particular area, where simply two things happen:

      1. Everyone who knows anything about the subject already has tons of offers to choose from (I had an offer from every major tech company and got to choose), so to hire someone you need to snatch them from someone else (who then needs to find a replacement).

      2. Only a small chunk of the population has the cognitive capacity to learn the stuff and be able to apply it well.

      I agree that most jobs, you could find someone local to do it, but when people come with these blanket statements that for any job we can always find someone and train them, that is complete BS. There are plenty of areas where you've got less than a 100 people worldwide with significant expertise in it and training someone takes 5+ years and even then only a handful of people can be trained.

      On the other hand, had I not been chosen in the H-1B lottery, Google would just have applied for an O-1, but they didn't since getting the H-1B was less work in case you happened to get lucky.

    20. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see someone with no experience on C++ jump in on Google's C++ library team as a software engineer. I guarantee that they would feel quite hopeless when asked to implement some finer points of e.g. C++17 or design idiomatic APIs for common tasks while trying to influence the standards committee to adopt similar APIs.

    21. Re:Seriously? by jandersen · · Score: 2

      The eerie irony of this is that the companies using contractors are often paying a higher hourly rate than they would for a permanent employee at the same time as the contractor himself is paid less than the normal wage. I think what is needed is something like a minimum wage scheme, graded after the profession - something like the average pay for that category minus a small percentage. Yes, I do realise it would put many contracting agencies out of business - that is sort of the point.

    22. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are the main reasons for mass immigration, which most people don't want - why would they? The more people who are looking for work, the lower employers can set wages.

    23. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right but you've likely just described 0.001% of the programming jobs out there.

    24. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about making sure you have a training pipeline. If it's so hard to learn, your team should have identified engineers that can be mentored to fill the gap when someone gets poached.

      It's basic risk mitigation. The reality is most stuff isn't that hard to learn. That's why it's generally better to hire smart, flexible people because technologies and focus change.

    25. Re: Seriously? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      <em>Only a small chunk of the population has the cognitive capacity to learn the stuff and be able to apply it well.</em>
      <br><br>
      Your sense of self worth is a little inflated.  If you can do it, at least 1% of the population of the planet is capable of it.  You're nowhere near as special as you think.

    26. Re: Seriously? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      Considering that at least 20% of the world's population lives in abject poverty and may never have even seen a computer, 1% being capable doesn't mean much.

    27. Re:Seriously? by jebrick · · Score: 1

      The difference is healthcare and other benefits. Companies would not do it if it were not cheaper

    28. Re:Seriously? by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also allows you to essentially fix costs for a position if you're using H1B as temporary labor. New employees every 3 years means never needing to raise what that position costs you.

      And as another poster pointed out above, these are rarely used to hire in workers of skill greater than they could find locally. I'm aware of a company that has staffed their QA department almost entirely through H1B, and their QA is not required to actually understand the product at all, just run specified test cases and report results. My dad is not a technical person and he could do their QA.

    29. Re:Seriously? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      While simultaneously replacing jobs that U.S. citizens might take.. after a computer-focused IT education provides them what they thought was the means to a career....

      Yet you fail to understand the "argument" that the United States is failing to provide qualified tech workers... even with years of STEM programs.

      So if they don't get the overworked-underpaid H1B temp employees they want and they for some reason can't find local talent... its time to ship jobs beyond our shores!

      Wait.. do I hear an echo from Disney-world?

      https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/us/last-task-after-layoff-at-disney-train-foreign-replacements.html

      California dreaming!

      http://www.computerworld.com/article/3117602/it-outsourcing/university-of-california-to-send-some-it-jobs-to-india.html

      This is corporate greed funded by legislation.. and nothing more.

      And you confirmed the GP point -- abuse of the program. Those companies that hire H1Bs in order to import them into this country are to be blamed (they keep 2 books similar to accounting). Those employers that outsource their work to a company which hires H1Bs are to be blamed. How hard is it to see that the program is not really the culprit, but companies that intend to cut their cost in order to make more profits are? Most of them are Indian companies, but one Australian based company caught on the loophole and now has been abusing it due to the growth in the industrial that is still a big problem in this country -- Health Care.

    30. Re:Seriously? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      The point is that US companies that directly employ H1B holders pay more than the companies whose business is outsourcing.

      Wow, what an insightful comment. This is like seriously posing a question such as: Which of the two turds is better?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    31. Re:Seriously? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      It is when Tech Companies go before Congress claiming they need more H-1B visas and claim H-1B visas don't cost jobs and don't depress wages. Having facts to refute those arguments is handy.

    32. Re:Seriously? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      You mean this point:

      "Top 10 H-1B employers are all IT offshore outsourcing firms, costing U.S. workers tens of thousands of jobs " http://www.epi.org/blog/top-10...

      You might want to read the article.

    33. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent about 4 hours learning FORTRAN for a 6 month job and was really good at it in a week.

    34. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1% of 6 billion is 60 million people... In absolute numbers 1% is huge. even if you take 20% off for 'abject poverty' you are still looking at what, 48 Million people?

      I think the numbers speak for themselves.

    35. Re:Seriously? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      My dad is not a technical person and he could do their QA.

      Judging from a lot of the crap out there, that would probably be an improvement.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    36. Re:Seriously? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It is when Tech Companies go before Congress claiming they need more H-1B visas and claim H-1B visas don't cost jobs and don't depress wages. Having facts to refute those arguments is handy.

      Congress has never let facts get in the way of listening to lobbyists. When it comes to special interests vs. the good of the public, they know which side their bread is buttered on. Otherwise, everyone would be covered by Medicare already.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    37. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be missing a 0, but if we have 7.5 billion people in the world, 1% of that is 75 million, right? Telling me out of 75 million people, you can't find a qualified candidate? Seems unlikely.

    38. Re:Seriously? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      It also allows you to essentially fix costs for a position if you're using H1B as temporary labor. New employees every 3 years means never needing to raise what that position costs you.

      And as another poster pointed out above, these are rarely used to hire in workers of skill greater than they could find locally. I'm aware of a company that has staffed their QA department almost entirely through H1B, and their QA is not required to actually understand the product at all, just run specified test cases and report results. My dad is not a technical person and he could do their QA.

      NO. Hiring new engineers for your product is super disruptive. It takes years for the new hire to learn the code, learn the company processes and get good at what they are doing. You want to retain as much as possible.

      I don't know how you can staff your QA with H1Bs. First, DOL's salary requirements are high. Second, lawyer and USCIS fees are also very high. Third, their salary and job description must be posted on the company common room and if anyone can claim that they have the minimum requirements for the job, the H1B must vacate that position for the US person.

    39. Re:Seriously? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't an employer hire someone cheaper? Isn't that the point of business? Raise profits and cut expenses is what creates jobs and an economy.

      Who is the real greedy one?

    40. Re:Seriously? by thunderclees · · Score: 1
      One could argue the costs are much higher since visa labor is often incompetent partially because they come from degree/certification mills.

      True case, and typical of H1B competence. You can also experience a version of this for yourself if you contact FIOs support.

      A company specializing in production control software in the NE was purchased and the new owners increased executive compensation and laid off all of their support staff replacing them with H1B people. Where a given issue would normally take a hour for the in house staff to solve remotely the H1B people needed to come on site for 2 weeks, constantly having to call someone else for directions and then lying about resolving the issue to the customer. The production control company had to close when they were dumped by their largest account.

      What will you do, where will you hide, when the man in black is on the inside? - Doktors for Bob

    41. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, people having money to spend is what creates an economy. Consumer spending is what drives the economy, and a healthy middle class is what kept us going after WW2. Those days are gone thanks to trickle-up capitalism and globalization.

      The rich don't spend nearly enough to make up for what the working poor.

      If the rich want to maintain their quality of life (i.e. rescue the American economy) the best thing they can do is go out and spend like crazy.

    42. Re: Seriously? by NickGnome · · Score: 1

      Agreed...but there are different schools of thought on what constitute "best practices". Brilliant, experienced software developer A's elegant best is an incomprehensible and un-maintainable to brilliant, experienced SW dev B. I've seen several people I consider to be in the world's top 1K go at it for several days at a clash over such professional differences before a manager became aware enough to break the log-jam.

    43. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you've missed the point which is that the overwhelming majority of people hired under H-1B visa program have been hired by body shops at below market wages and that that practice has contributed to overall wage decreases at the middle and lower end of the tech market.

      Yes, some people hired under the H-1B program are hired for the right reasons and are paid well for their expertise, but you all are exceptions, not the norm.

  3. The sky is blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water is wet. News at 11.

    1. Re:The sky is blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tilted playing field is tilted.

  4. I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That corporations would do the most economically sensible thing, given the conditions at hand.

    In other words: Duh. Now that we have the evidence, can we PLEASE do something about this?

    I have serious problems with a visa that's designed for the worker to have to go home again later (I know that a fair number of H1B holders do convert to green card holders, but that's deliberately NOT the point of an H1B).

    H1B should be a fairly rare thing - if the US is so short of workers that you have to go oversees, then we should be giving out green cards and encouraging citizenship, not paying crap wages, depressing pay scales for US workers, and then sending them home.

    Take the number of H1B visas issued, and put that number into the green card program instead. I want people who are going to stay and be my neighbor, not temps from oversees!

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      (I know that a fair number of H1B holders do convert to green card holders, but that's deliberately NOT the point of an H1B).

      Wrong. H1B visas are "dual-intent" -- this means that it is expected that the holder will apply for a green card.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make employers bid for H1B visas. Order the applications by salary and accept the top N applications, where N is the number that we decide to admit that year.

    3. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      In fact, we need to get rid of all H1Bs.
      In addition, divide the number of green cards by 10, and use that.
      The reason is that majority of H1B is being used to replace Americans, not supplement us, AND, Green Cards will stay while about 50% of H1Bs convert.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The problem remains that most applications, regardless of how you order them are held by a small set of companies and these companies aren't going to be bidding against themselves.

      Best thing to do is have an open job search market system where you only accept applications from individuals which have at least an accredited Masters degree and above and you have to pay at least 125% of the average wages for that position.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      right right. This is why it takes on average 10-15 years for someone from India to be granted a Green card and any tiny misstep in that 15 years can negate any progress they've made forcing them to start over or move back to India. yes, i'm sure that was the intent. The dirty little secret is that often times people and governments don't actually mean what they say. Looking the other way while people drive through loopholes as big as the airplanes used to keep bringing over new cheap labor.

    6. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by CraigCruden · · Score: 2

      H1B is a 3 year visa. An employee is limited to 2 of them. It is a dual-intent visa and it takes almost 6 years to navigate the green card process. H1B is one of the only dual-intent visas. The US Immigration system is broken and getting rid of H1B visas is only the answer if they replace it with a provisional green card where the employee is not tied to a single employer (i.e. if you are gainfully employed for 6 years on the provisional green card you a transferred to a permanent green card. Basically, there will be a limited number of sponsored tech workers entering the US but they will not be restricted in salary/benefit negotiations if they can just go to another company and not be locked into one employer during that period. Companies that currently abuse the visa would find there imported labour walk away from them for better jobs.

    7. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the least economically sensible thing. If everybody does it, then nobody can buy products. It is amazingly short-sighted and "money today, and I don't care if the world is a poisoned nuclear wasteland when I die, your grandkids can fix it".

      Bah humbug.

  5. I'm shocked by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

    Positiviely shocked. Hilary says that outsourcing is good for the economy.

    1. Re:I'm shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, when you can not say anything intelligent, just turn it into some political lie.
      What a fucking idiot.

    2. Re:I'm shocked by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Like your comment. Hillary Clinton said out sourcing was good for the country. While Senator of NY she increased the number of H1B Visas. Interestingly one of her donors was an out sourcing firm.

    3. Re:I'm shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary Clinton said out sourcing was good for the country. [Citation Needed]
      While Senator of NY she increased the number of H1B Visas. [Citation Needed]
      Interestingly one of her donors was an out sourcing firm. [Citation Needed]

      Not saying that you're not right, just saying that I can't take your word for it.
      Please provide evidence.

  6. The real money by bobstreo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The IT outsourcing companies make a ton of other money in the process.

        From a percentage of the pay their H-1B contracts receive, to the flop houses they store their programmers in while they're not at work, it's all pure profit.

  7. Easily fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The H1B issue is easily fixed but politicians on either side do not really want to fix it. The simple fix is just a max applicants of 1000 per organization per year. This ensures IT outsourcers cannot game the lottery by submitting a ton of applicants each year which they do, and that legitimate companies like Google, Facebook, MicroSoft, Amazon etc. have enough to fill their needs.

  8. 2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Data here

    Is it any wonder that middle class wages have stagnated and young workers are under employed?

    And some people still can't figure out why Hillary lost....

    1. Re: 2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really believe that don't you?

    2. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has Trump done something about it yet?
      Other than Boost the Number of Visas for Low skilled workers?

      Trump Lies Better than Hillary?

    3. Re: 2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's less than 20% of the unemployed population in the US. Or an average of 2% over the decade.

      5 times as many people are looking for work in any given year. I am sure the wages were already depressed before the H1s got to it.

      and our wages are being depre

    4. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pivot to Hillary. Surely it's all her fault. Or else Obama's.

    5. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [ Just to be clear: I'm a virulent anti-Trump liberal. I'm not trying to shill for the guy. I think he's awful ] On this front, there've been two developments you can attribute to Trump: 1. USCIS has suspended priority processing of H1Bs, which reduces some mobility of H1B workers; 2. The general travel ban and xenophobia of his administration has had a chilling effect on non-US residents' desire or willingness to come to the US to work. This also includes people who are in the US today who have started considering leaving. If you're against more foreign workers, I'd say he (well, his administration) actually has some accomplishments to point to.

    6. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody in the Midwest was interested in seeing her, outside Chicago. Everywhere she went her crowds were fractional compared to Trump's.

      The problem isn't Russia, it's the MSM distortion field, the bulk of the country isn't LA, NYC and Chicago, and have jobs that don't include instagraming our asses.

    7. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, if you like fires, he's started them. Which means new home construction will be up.

    8. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost because, as a modern liberated feminist woman, she should have kicked Bill Clinton to the curb several decades ago. The email scandal was an example of her inability to think through the consequences and avoid them by actually following the law, and oh, my dear lord, the mess she left in Northern Africa as Secretary of State is still haunting us as the disaster in Libya resonated throughout the region.

    9. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspending priority processing is an absolute shit change though.

      There are two types of H1B employers:

      - Legitimate employers who really want to hire specific people they have identified as being exceptional recruits
      - Exploiter employers who hire boatloads of people at crap wages and don't care who they get, then contract them out at stupid markups

      Priority processing was there to allow the legitimate people to spend more money to actually have the visa work the way it's intended. Now they get lost in the sea of exploiters. The legit people get punished, and the exploiters go on with no change.

    10. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I don't think he has helped at all, sure if what you wanted was foreigners out then yes, but if it was jobs then he is hurting us. The net effect of his policies is that projects that would have normally brought people into the country to augment projects are now being done wholly overseas as the difficulty with visa's causes too much of a strain on timelines. Our company recently decided to run one of our large projects out of Europe for this reason instead of US and another is also being considered to be moved as well. This has actually resulted in lost jobs in the US for our company.

    11. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost because, as a modern liberated feminist woman, she should have kicked Bill Clinton to the curb several decades ago.

      That's not why Hillary Clinton lost the election. She did well with modern liberated feminist women. There have been many excellent books written on the subject in recent months explaining in great detail why Hillary Clinton lost. If you weren't so intellectually lazy you would already know this, but like many liberals you assume that you already know it all and can't be bothered. Keep it up buttercup and you'll see what it gets you in the 2020.

    12. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has actually resulted in lost jobs in the US for our company.

      Except that you admit that you were bringing in foreigners to meet deadlines which means Americans weren't getting those jobs anyway and even when Americans do work they get stiffed on wages. Since 1978 the overwhelming share of profits from massive productivity gains has gone to owners of capital and not labor so what is the American worker getting out of the deal? Is it any wonder why he voted for Trump? If you want better policy and politics then you have to stop screwing the little guy and cut him in for a piece of the action. Otherwise you'll get more politicians like Donald Trump as people decide, "fuck it, if I'm going to get screwed then so are you."

    13. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Afty0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has Trump done something about it yet?

      Yes, I am a Brit trying to get into the US on the H1B program because my girlfriend is there. It is now significantly harder to get companies to even talk to me since they defunded priority applications. My best shot is to apply in April, for a visa that *may* start in October. My chances of getting it are very slim though.

      Note that I'm in software, in London, earn a very good salary and have 20 years of experience - I'm a model candidate - and I've been told by some people over there that I may as well not bother and to "explore other options"...

    14. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody in the Midwest was interested in seeing her, outside Chicago.

      Then why was the vote so close? Not only was there no landslide for Trump, many of the closest states were in the Midwest.

      Everywhere she went her crowds were fractional compared to Trump's.

      99/100ths is a fraction.

      The problem isn't Russia, it's the MSM distortion field, the bulk of the country isn't LA, NYC and Chicago, and have jobs that don't include instagraming our asses.

      So you say, but your lack of suspenders suggests otherwise. Maybe you need to get off the backcountry Redneck distortion field, and stop hating people in LA, NYC, and Chicago just cuz the radio box tells you to do so.

    15. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by link-error · · Score: 1

            and how many of those degrees are from degree mills over there?

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    16. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Hillary Clinton did not do well with "modern liberated feminist women." She did well with the old guard feminist but had a hard time with the modern ones.

      Since you know why because you are not intellectually lazy and have read all those excellent books, it would be very easy for you to provide us with the "real reason" why Hillary Clinton lost. Since you didn't post the reason, it's obvious you don't have an answer. Troll somewhere else.

    17. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, hell, by that logic, we should just let the hedge funds run rampant and collapse the economy a few more times. Once we've destroyed the GDP, nobody will want to come here to work. MAGA via bankruptcy!

    18. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BuBye now. . . . .

    19. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be burning you up that you have to get in line behind all the bloddy Pakis. LOL. A just comeuppance for centuries of oppression.

    20. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by strikethree · · Score: 2

      Note that I'm in software, in London, earn a very good salary and have 20 years of experience - I'm a model candidate - and I've been told by some people over there that I may as well not bother and to "explore other options"...

      You are the perfect candidate for what the H1-B program "should" be for. The H1-B program has been twisted to lower the average wages of all employees, in which case, you are ideally the WRONG candidate.

      I wonder what they are doing with all of that extra money they are "saving"? Surely there are only so many castles and personal servants a person could own. I do not see the money going into new and innovative businesses nor improving infrastructure, nor, most importantly, increasing our understanding and ability to manipulate the universe through Scientific Research.

      Is it just desirable to have utterly poverty stricken masses that can be abused and an upper class that never needs to worry about anything other than how their stupid narcissistic endeavors may end up destroying all of modern civilization?

      I just don't get it. Life is more fun for everyone (including the upper class) if they have lots of talented and creative people willing to do talented and creative things. People in abject poverty can rarely achieve talented and creative things of note. There are no resources for such things. Sure, dancing, football (soccer or American), etc require talent and can be fun to watch, but I am thinking more fundamentally here. New literature that makes people think and possibly drives new cultural attitudes. Scientific questions generally need money to validate answers.

      I dunno. It seems like we are in a war of absolute control while forgetting what life is really all about: The Experience... and creating new humans.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    21. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been many excellent books written on the subject in recent months explaining in great detail why Hillary Clinton lost. If you weren't so intellectually lazy you would already know this, but like many liberals you assume that you already know it all and can't be bothered. Keep it up buttercup and you'll see what it gets you in the 2020.

      Don't be too smug with the Liberals. Those books laid out the fact that Hillary lost because of white resentment towards a changing culture and social order. White working-class people don't understand why they can't make any money anymore, or why they have to press1 for English, and blame immigrants and black people for it. The 12 Cookies joke is funny because it's true, and it got Trump elected.

    22. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      That's one perspective. Another is that she ran the most incompetent and negative campaign in modern history. It has been demonstrated that she completely failed to lay out a plan for why anyone would vote for her, other than that she wasn't Trump, and she spent most of her advertising money in places that she had already locked down instead of places where the outcomes were less sure.

      But, you can go ahead and blame it on the deluded white racists clinging to their God and guns if you want.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    23. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anti Trump because your a moron or a fool, stop using sodium flouride and perhaps you can start thinking for yourself and your countries interests vs the 265bil bank account companies.
      Dumbing down of america is complete when you all believe that the media and your college were not tainted in the 60's by people with agenda's and they hate you.

    24. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You *might* be the perfect candidate. I've personally met probably fewer than a handful of developers who were truly worthy of H1-Bs and represent what the program was supposed to be fore.

      The program was intended to facilitate hiring personnel when it was *impossible* to find equivalently staffed personnel here in the US (at any price). (For example, I know one H1-B candidate who was one of the fewer than half-dozen engineers familiar with the details of on-disk format of ZFS and capable of doing data recovery on corrupted ZFS partitions (such as when some idiot imports the same pool from two hosts simultaneously over a mutlti-host FC array.) That guy had skills that you simply COULD NOT FIND in the US (or anywhere else), and probably could have commanded whatever salary he wanted.

      What the program is *not* intended for is to provide a cheap alternative to US labor, or to provide immigration opportunity for engineers (skilled or otherwise) when equivalently skilled persons are available in the US (at any price). (Whether you are "uniquely" talented or not is something I don't know... I probably would fall into the uniquely skilled talent pool, as I have some very uncommon low-level systems knowledge. But then I'm a US citizen by birth, so this is a non-issue for me. :-)

      The fact that your significant (but unmarried) other here is of no consequence -- immigration law is not designed around dating relationships; it isn't fair to give a US job to a non-resident foreign national just because said foreigner has a girlfriend/boyfriend here in the US. If you're just wanting to come visit (not permanently, and not work), then you can apply for a tourist visa (or from the UK you can just come directly due to visa waiver; your stay duration will be limited.)

      That said, if your girlfriend is a US citizen, and you're serious enough to consider marriage, a K-1 visa may be a realistic option.

    25. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not getting in there are hardly any H1Bs allocated for the UK. They all go to india and china.... yes the us govt sets aside certain numbers for each country

    26. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Has Trump done something about it yet?

      Yes, I am a Brit trying to get into the US on the H1B program because my girlfriend is there. It is now significantly harder to get companies to even talk to me since they defunded priority applications. My best shot is to apply in April, for a visa that *may* start in October. My chances of getting it are very slim though. Note that I'm in software, in London, earn a very good salary and have 20 years of experience - I'm a model candidate - and I've been told by some people over there that I may as well not bother and to "explore other options"...

      Absolute hogwash.

      Priority processing has nothing to do with this. Even with priority processing, you still apply in April and come in October. It's just that you'll know in June instead of July if you're coming or not.

      If you have a company that is genuinely interested in you then it is possible to do EB2 green card. It takes about 6 months before you can get your work permit and green card about 5-8 months afterwards. It is more complicated and more burden on the employer to file 4 stages of paperwork to prove that you are getting paid high enough salary, not taking an American's job and that the employer has enough money to pay you. But, it is possible to go outside of H1B.

      I don't know about Britain, but a lot of European countries have treaty visas, special visas negotiated per country basis. So, it bypasses everything but depends on the country.

    27. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did issue the executive order that gave us the statics we are looking at today. Prior to that getting this kind of information out of the government was extremely difficult. He's also at least using his bully pulpit to put pressure on companies to hire Americans first. Not as good as fixing the law but still better than nothing.

    28. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From https://www.uscis.gov/news/uscis-resume-h-1b-premium-processing-certain-cap-exempt-petitions ...
      Release Date: July 24, 2017
      WASHINGTON â" U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will resume premium processing for certain cap-exempt H-1B petitions effective immediately. ...

    29. Re:2.6 million H-1Bs over a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From https://www.uscis.gov/news/uscis-resume-h-1b-premium-processing-certain-cap-exempt-petitions ...
      Release Date: July 24, 2017
      WASHINGTON â" U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will resume premium processing for certain cap-exempt H-1B petitions effective immediately. ...

  9. Other side of coin by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Too bad they can't outsource management and CEO's. Let's see how they like it.

    1. Re:Other side of coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They soon will be replacing middle managers with AI, cost 1 license to have 10 middle managers replaced at 10k.
      I have trained an AI for middle management already by having it read every existing Dilbert!

    2. Re:Other side of coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, "A.I." is coming soon to take care of them...

  10. yawn ... by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 0

    New data, you say? It's common fucking sense that clients and the Pimps: Wipro, Syntel, IBM Export Blue, Cognizant, Infosys ... they all take advantage of H1-Bs. The quality of work is typically subpar, the majority of Indians can follow a script but rarely think outside the box or solve problems. Of course there are exceptions to this but generalizations are generally true ... Warren Buffet has been kicking around changing American Express to Indian Express.

  11. I'm confused by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Why is it not a requirement to pay above average wages for H1-B holders? The only reason they have the visa is because there is no local worker with the required skill, right?

    1. Re:I'm confused by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      it IS a requirement.
      Our gov under W and then O, and now Trump, have not enforced it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re: I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it not a requirement to pay above average wages for H1-B holders? The only reason they have the visa is because there is no local worker with the required skill, right?

      You obviously are confused, because it is a requirement to pay above average wages.

      Fucking idiot. No wonder you are worried about your job.

  12. There's a Fix by BBCWatcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Naively capping H-1Bs at 1,000 per organization would only result in more organizations. The outsourcers would simply lean on shell companies. Depending on the elasticities, workers would get paid even less in order to fund the extra overhead. That won't work.

    2. There is an easy fix, actually: set minimum H-1B salaries to $10,000 per month (2017 dollars, inflation indexed) nationwide, up to $2,000/month more (2017 dollars) in high cost of living areas (e.g. Silicon Valley), plus require that the employer post a 12 month bond. That'll have zero impact on Apple and several other legitimate H-1B employers. Closely monitor compliance (e.g. compare to tax records), deport any employee paying kickbacks, throw anybody accepting kickbacks in prison, and keep the bond if there are any rule violations.

    3. A variation on #2 is to hold monthly or quarterly H-1B auctions. The bid price is the employee's salary, and the highest salaries win, subject to a $10,000/month (2017 dollars) floor.

    Options #2 and #3 would help boost government revenues since high salaries (for both the H-1Bs and resident workers) mean higher tax payments.

    1. Re:There's a Fix by taustin · · Score: 2

      On #2, I'd say only deport them if they refuse to testify against whoever they paid the kickbacks to. And if that person is convicted, give the H1B holder a green card.

      "You need to give me 10% of your paycheck."

      "Oh, thank you sir, I'll be a US citizen before you get out of prison."

    2. Re:There's a Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This creates a powerful, unifying, incentive for the H1Bs to conspire against the employer. And any that won't play ball, can be sabotaged by their peers, deported, and replaced with new candidates.

    3. Re:There's a Fix by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      An even easier solution would be to simply say that only 5% (or some other reasonable amount) of your workforce can be H-1Bs. That would effectively eliminate the consultant sweatshops, and at the same time it wouldn't matter if you sub-divide your org into many to try to get around it, a percentage is a percentage. Want to hire more H-1B's, well better find more domestic help then also to a larger degree. Need more than the allowed percentage? Then perhaps you shouldn't be running your business, or at least not in the US. It would also mean, if a company can only get x% of H-B's, they are going to try to get the best ones, using them for actual useful high end intensive tasks, not drudgery (you can easily find US interns for that), and that will also drive the wages into being competitive.

      There you are welcome, I solved all your problems. Of course all of that would be depended on said changes being done and not torpedoed with loopholes, and also that it would actually be enforced with debilitating penalties should companies decide to try and cheat... Good luck with that, but I can only do so much...

    4. Re:There's a Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK *shrug*

    5. Re:There's a Fix by bdares · · Score: 1

      Re point 2: The minimum salary should be tied to the industry average, not some arbitrary high-sounding number. The bond serves what purpose other than blocking all but the largest (FAANG) from the H1-B program? This sounds like the billionaire's wet dream.

    6. Re:There's a Fix by m00sh · · Score: 1

      1. Naively capping H-1Bs at 1,000 per organization would only result in more organizations. The outsourcers would simply lean on shell companies. Depending on the elasticities, workers would get paid even less in order to fund the extra overhead. That won't work.

      2. There is an easy fix, actually: set minimum H-1B salaries to $10,000 per month (2017 dollars, inflation indexed) nationwide, up to $2,000/month more (2017 dollars) in high cost of living areas (e.g. Silicon Valley), plus require that the employer post a 12 month bond. That'll have zero impact on Apple and several other legitimate H-1B employers. Closely monitor compliance (e.g. compare to tax records), deport any employee paying kickbacks, throw anybody accepting kickbacks in prison, and keep the bond if there are any rule violations.

      3. A variation on #2 is to hold monthly or quarterly H-1B auctions. The bid price is the employee's salary, and the highest salaries win, subject to a $10,000/month (2017 dollars) floor.

      Options #2 and #3 would help boost government revenues since high salaries (for both the H-1Bs and resident workers) mean higher tax payments.

      This will let the rich buy H1B visas.

      Make a shell company, and hire yourself.

    7. Re:There's a Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rich don't need H1B visas, there are a litany of options for the wealthy to obtain US residency(EB5 program) and lets face it if you can pay yourself a big salary and are outside the US chances are there are more beneficial places to form your shell corp. Raising the salary works, if you really have a skill that is difficult to hire for companies should absolutely be paying more than college hire get paid. When I started in software development it was entirely common for people right out of college to make 90-100k and people who went to the tech companies got upwards of 120k to start and this was 15 years ago, the wage in high cost markets is approx 130k-150k for a real developer as of today. The auction is great as it would yield the greatest economic benefit by presumably bringing in the most qualified people and yielding maximum tax payments. Also other types are visas are abused by these companies and that needs to be investigated as well.

    8. Re:There's a Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already exists, it's called an E2 visa.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    9. Re:There's a Fix by taustin · · Score: 1

      That's why courts allow both sides to present their case, and juries to judge the credibility of witnesses and evidence.

      The second time that happens, the employer will have a recording of every interaction with every employee.

      But, hey, at least the employee won't get deported until they finish their sentence for perjury.

    10. Re:There's a Fix by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      2. There is an easy fix, actually: set minimum H-1B salaries to $10,000 per month

      That doesn't work, I know from people who left here to go work in the states on H1B that they don't receive their full salary because things like company housing, company healthcare benefits are counted as part of their salary. The value is somewhat dictated by the employer since they are the provider that you agree to when signing the contract.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  13. No, we can't by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because it's not an issue that brings anyone to the polls. You've got guns, abortion, Obamacare and coal jobs (mostly because it's a swing state issue). But H1-Bs? Nope. Nobody votes on it. If you wanna end H1-B abuses you need to start voting in your primaries and tossing the incumbents out when then vote against it. But good luck, I doubt you could get the herd of cats that is IT people to vote as a block. Besides, we're all convinced we're the irreplaceable guy...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: No, we can't by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As real average wages (adjusted for cost of living) continue to drop, and the last of the independent consultants are starved out, maybe we programmers can finally grow up, stop acting like man-children, and show some solidarity.

      Or maybe we'll become like immediate post-USSR Russia. A huge pool of highly skilled programmers, with near zero job prospects. Nany of whom will turn to illicit activity.

    2. Re: No, we can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't grouping everyone who disagrees with into a group called âoeman childrenâ itself rather ... childish?

    3. Re:No, we can't by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 1

      You are wrong in at least one case: mine. I pretty much have one issue I vote on and it's H1B visas. Half joking here but as far as I'm concerned Trump can abort every LGBTQ with an AR-15 assault rifle, nuke the whales, pave the planet with CO2 belching tractors, put on clown makup to gargle Putin's balls, and build a 100 foot wall of undulating penises waving at Mexico. I'm a single issue voter and that single issue is the H1B visa program. If Trump can nix it, I'll be the one person voting for him.

      As someone said earlier. They should be greencard holders, instead. Then we at least have the option of fighting back and forming a union or something. That'll never happen as long as I'm competing with indentured servants. I'm happy to compete on quality (*any* *day*), but not on price. I'm happy to compete with Americans (brown, white, black, whatever) but not with 3 billion people from 3rd world nations for the sake of labor arbitrage by the elite so they can buy a bigger boat and a new lambo.

      Rich folks need to see some guillotines being constructed inside the walls of their gated communities. It seems like that's the only thing that is going to reverse the "unstoppable force" of globalization. The aristocracy became much more pliant after the French started rolling their heads down the street (the ones that lived).

    4. Re:No, we can't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Ok. Name one politician to vote for who cares? Trump and Hillary are both pro h1b1 visa.

    5. Re:No, we can't by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      You are wrong in at least one case: mine. I pretty much have one issue I vote on and it's H1B visas. ...as far as I'm concerned Trump can abort every LGBTQ with an AR-15 assault rifle, nuke the whales, pave the planet with CO2 belching tractors, put on clown makup to gargle Putin's balls, and build a 100 foot wall of undulating penises waving at Mexico.

      Clown makeup? Now you've gone too far!

    6. Re:No, we can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ok. Name one politician to vote for who cares?

      Elizabeth Warren.

  14. Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    in the swing states. Arrogance and bad data cost her the election, not a lack of lip service to tech workers. We don't vote in blocks and we've got a host of other issues (gun rights, gay rights, abortion, taxes) that motivate us, so we never stand a chance. If you want to end H1-b abuse you need to make it a central issue for a large block of voters; particularly in swing states. Until then you'll get lip service from the parties and nothing more. I'll remind you Trump has done nothing of consequence to reign the program in...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Hillary Clinton lost because voters had a choice between a Republican running as a Democrat and a Democrat running as a Republican....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost because Obama couldn't run for a third term.

    3. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hillary lost because she comes off as a manipulative bitch with an axe to grind. The election was over when Bernie Sanders lost.

    4. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in the swing states. Arrogance and bad data cost her the election

      Some of the states that went for Trump have not generally been recognized as swing states in recent Presidential elections. For example, the so-called "blue wall" states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin had been reliably Democratic in Presidential elections for decades before 2016. Their loss on election night was frankly a huge surprise to the Democrats, signalling that clearly something had gone horribly wrong. On the issue of "bad data" Hillary Clinton was hardly alone in thinking that the white working class vote no longer mattered and could be safely written off as an acceptable sacrifice in pursuit of seemingly more desirable demographic groups including Latinos, Blacks, LGBTQ and mixed race individuals to combine with their college educated whites. Trump meanwhile was quick to capitalize on her callousness and masterfully played upon the fears of working class whites, channeling their anger over economic issues into a massive backlash against coastal liberal "elites", of which Hillary Clinton is a paragon, and recalling the days of elections past where "limousine liberals" botched their approach to white working class voters, as personified by Archie Bunker of All in the Family. Well, to paraphrase Monty Python, "He's not dead yet". That's why Hillary lost the election. The preferred answers of some on the left, including racism and Russian meddling, were marginal compared to the economic issues and would probably still not have been enough to sway the election back to Hillary had they not been issues at all. Bill Clinton said it best in 1992, "It's the economy, stupid".

    5. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost because she did not get enough votes.

    6. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilary lost because MOST of the electorate don't support her - look at the size of Trump's campaign crowds versus Hilary's - and that's in spite of the anti-democratic efforts of some Hilary supporters (or Bernie supporters) to physically prevent Trump supporters or even POTENTIAL Trump supporters from actually getting to his speeches, by blocking roads! Unbelievable.

    7. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by asylumx · · Score: 2

      Hillary lost because she didn't get enough electoral votes to win. Everything beyond that is speculation.

    8. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hillary lost because she lost."

      Real insightful.

    9. Re:Hillary lost because she didn't campaign by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Whyever Hillary lost, the DNC lost because it chose to run Clinton over Sanders. The polls outright said that Sanders could beat Trump and Clinton couldn't, the voters said they wanted to vote for Sanders, the DNC said fuck you, and reality said fuck the DNC.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. stop h1B, and issue more visas based on job by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, rather than doing H1Bs, it should be green cards and should based on corporate needs.
    Also, the hire should be required to ONLY work INSIDE of that company. IOW, they can not be contracted out.
    Finally, the green card holder should not be allowed to contract for the first 5 years that they are here.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:stop h1B, and issue more visas based on job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This pretty much describes the Swiss system for workers from outside the EU.

    2. Re:stop h1B, and issue more visas based on job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Switzerland there is also the additional requirement that no one currently registered for unemployment matches the skillset of the proposed new hire.

  16. Trump will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have faith, ye of little faith. There will be orgiastic prosperity for ALL!

    1. Re: Trump will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right?

  17. You got to look at the reasons behind outsourcing by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Here in Sweden, we have had an outsourcing problem for many years too, this isn't unique to the U.S. in any way, shape or form - it's just got more attention because "USA".

    People want a big salary, they've become accustomed to high salaries and do not want to change their lifestyle. What about electronics? We're living in times were you can purchase a huge 50 inch flat screen TV for 300 bucks or less, electronics gadgets are almost ludicrously cheap - and salaries at an all time high. Our standard of living has never in history been any better than it is now, and we got a new form of 1st world disease called "comfort issues".

    Heh, Europe is no better. There's a so called "poverty" standard, that says that if you earn less than roughly 700$ per month, then you're below the poverty limit. I've seen people beg on the street corners for money, rags for clothes - and they don't even have an income, what do we call those then?

    In Sweden - people are used to a certain income, anything less than 120 SEK an hour - is pure poverty according to them (that's around 15$ for you Americans). I saw a program series on TV we have here called "Lyxfallan" roughly translated as The Luxury trap/money trap. It's about singles or couples that have overspent, and are now trapped in debt they "can't" get out of by themselves. I saw this woman that was on TV crying her mascara off - "I don't know what to do, no one can live below 2000$ a month, I'm so poor - this is hopeless". Wow - just wow.

    I live in a freaking HOUSE of my own, and I sometimes worked hard as a substitute teacher and sometimes I had to live on my savings, sometimes I only get 500$ a month to live on - but I survive - without ANY debt. How? I save, I don't need the latest "border-less" big-screen TV, I'm fine with my 9 year old 47" tv which is still pretty darn good and big. I purchase second hand furniture, I purchase food in bulk, and watch out for coupon sales. Am I poor? According to some authorities I'm supposed to be dirt-poor in their eyes, but I feel crazy rich since I got my entire house, property and all the food I can eat.

    And that's the problem with our society today, no one is willing to compromise on their living standards, daughter gotta have the latest iPhone, right? Otherwise she'll be the laughing stock of the entire school, right? Wrong! No one NEEDS the latest and greatest, what we do need though - is to get our stuff together, realize that if we WANT jobs to STAY in our country, we need to adjust to the times we live in.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  18. It is a form of endenture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way it works is the company sponsors your H1-B in exchange you have to work 1 year for them and they off course set the terms.
    I was there, the solution was to create my own company and sponsor it myself.

  19. Re: You got to look at the reasons behind outsourc by Reverend+Green · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you were earning $500/mo in the States, you would NOT have a house of your own and plenty of food. You would be living in a cardboard box under a bridge and eating out of dumpsters. Get real, broham.

  20. Re:You got to look at the reasons behind outsourci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > And that's the problem with our society today, no one is willing to compromise on their living standards,

    It's not no one. It's the women. Single moms, expecting the income and benefits that used to be tied to a full-time salaried man with a *wife at home*, expecting society to provide all the benefits for them that the stay at home dad used to pay for, and "we don't need men" translating to "men don't need you, either, if they can just evaporate at whim".

    Take a good look at the number of US workers overseas are divorced men skipping alimony, and vice versa.

  21. Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by rossz · · Score: 2

    Don't tie the visa to a specific company. Make it easy for the workers to switch jobs. H1B workers are damn near indentured servants because it's so damn hard to switch jobs. The result is they have to put up with crap that a regular worker wouldn't tolerate, e.g. longer hours (at a fixed salary), no bonuses, shorter or no vacations, etc. It's not just about the salary. It's the ability to completely control the workers.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by CraigCruden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are two issues with the process. The H1B is the only visa that allows for dual purpose/intent - temporary worker while allowing for the person to have the intent to work permanently in the United States. It is often used while a company is sponsoring the individual for a green card. H1B is a maximum of 2 3yr visas, and sponsoring for a green card typically takes almost 6 years to process. During this time a worker cannot change employers or they have to start over on the green card application -- basically turning them into indentured servants with little or no ability to negotiate on pay.

      The H1B tech worker program should be changed into a temporary work permit given to the employee (not the employer) while the green card application is underway. The green card application once started should have the ability to "transfer sponsors". H1B visas should require a minimum salary at or above the prevailing wage. Data on salaries of local hires and H1Bs should be reported annually, and if a company is abusing the visa then they should be banned from sponsoring them for a period of 5 years.

    2. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Don't tie the visa to a specific company. Make it easy for the workers to switch jobs. H1B workers are damn near indentured servants because it's so damn hard to switch jobs. The result is they have to put up with crap that a regular worker wouldn't tolerate, e.g. longer hours (at a fixed salary), no bonuses, shorter or no vacations, etc. It's not just about the salary. It's the ability to completely control the workers.

      This was fixed 15-20 years ago.

      H1Bs can easily switch jobs. It does cost the company legal fees and USCIS fees (around $4000 or so) but it is pretty straightforward to switch.

    3. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by m00sh · · Score: 1

      There are two issues with the process. The H1B is the only visa that allows for dual purpose/intent - temporary worker while allowing for the person to have the intent to work permanently in the United States. It is often used while a company is sponsoring the individual for a green card. H1B is a maximum of 2 3yr visas, and sponsoring for a green card typically takes almost 6 years to process. During this time a worker cannot change employers or they have to start over on the green card application -- basically turning them into indentured servants with little or no ability to negotiate on pay. The H1B tech worker program should be changed into a temporary work permit given to the employee (not the employer) while the green card application is underway. The green card application once started should have the ability to "transfer sponsors". H1B visas should require a minimum salary at or above the prevailing wage. Data on salaries of local hires and H1Bs should be reported annually, and if a company is abusing the visa then they should be banned from sponsoring them for a period of 5 years.

      There are already stuff like this.

      Main problem is that most H1Bs are from India and because of the diversity quotas (one country cannot send more than 10% of the total immigrants per year), the backlog is decades long.

      However, a lot of stuff like 140 and priority dates are transferable.

      However, the whole green card process was never indented to be a 2 year process. It was 3-4 months process and stuff that made sense for a 3-4 month process doesn't make sense for 2 year process. For example, considering a green card application as abandoned for leaving a job makes sense for a 3-4 month process but doesn't make sense for 2 year process.

    4. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by rossz · · Score: 1

      I don't consider that a reasonable fix. The process is still a pain and costly. As Craig suggested in his response to me, tie the visa to the worker, not the company. I would add to his suggestion, if you remain unemployed for too long, your visa is cancelled. How long is too long is open for discussion.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    5. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      It takes almost the entirety of the time limit to complete the green card application -- you basically are committing only to use the H1B as a temporary work permit for a maximum of 6 years then leave -- if you are able to switch employers (your employer is your green card sponsor).

      If the H1B "temporary/permanent dual intent" is changed to something like a provisional green card - you the employee have the provisional green card... As long as you pay taxes, are not a burden on society, work a minimum of 5 years accumulated, stay out of the criminal justice system -- the provisional green card status becomes full green card status.

      I did work on a TN1 status in the US for a couple of years - but I turned down the offer to transfer to an H1B and start the green card process -- it just was not worth it. I have no plans on ever returning to work in the United States - but I do recognize that the American system is a complete mess which does not give priority to those that are skilled -- which leaves these H1B visas as basically a hack where immigration reform that changes to a point based system that favoured high tech / employment sponsored for permanent status.
      Points would be issued on:
      1. English language proficiency
      2. Education (American University Education would be the most points).
      3. Education (University/College - Skilled - Assigned based on University ranking globally)
      4. Employment Offer / Salary based points
      5. Prior Employment History in selected fields (American University can be duplicated and applied for these points as well).
      6. Age
      7. Marital Status (Married - your wife has her points calculated and then combined and divided by 2)
      Figure out the immigration target level - divide it by 12 (monthly) and then those that have the most points in the month of the application get approved in that month. An employer may make another job offer the following month and your status could be evaluated in the following month (it would rely on a patient employer).

      The system would encourage talent to immigrate or those with American University degrees to be ranked highly. The H1B would become redundant then.

    6. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by m00sh · · Score: 1

      I don't consider that a reasonable fix. The process is still a pain and costly. As Craig suggested in his response to me, tie the visa to the worker, not the company. I would add to his suggestion, if you remain unemployed for too long, your visa is cancelled. How long is too long is open for discussion.

      H1B is attributed to the person first, not the company. A person cannot get an H1B without a company sponsorship but the H1B belongs to the person.

      If unemployed for too long, the visa is not cancelled. The person is free to start up another H1B again with another company anytime afterwards. It's just that immigration does not let you stay in the US but free to come back anytime they have another sponsor.

    7. Re:Easy to eliminate H1B abuse by m00sh · · Score: 1

      It takes almost the entirety of the time limit to complete the green card application -- you basically are committing only to use the H1B as a temporary work permit for a maximum of 6 years then leave -- if you are able to switch employers (your employer is your green card sponsor). If the H1B "temporary/permanent dual intent" is changed to something like a provisional green card - you the employee have the provisional green card... As long as you pay taxes, are not a burden on society, work a minimum of 5 years accumulated, stay out of the criminal justice system -- the provisional green card status becomes full green card status. I did work on a TN1 status in the US for a couple of years - but I turned down the offer to transfer to an H1B and start the green card process -- it just was not worth it. I have no plans on ever returning to work in the United States - but I do recognize that the American system is a complete mess which does not give priority to those that are skilled -- which leaves these H1B visas as basically a hack where immigration reform that changes to a point based system that favoured high tech / employment sponsored for permanent status. Points would be issued on: 1. English language proficiency 2. Education (American University Education would be the most points). 3. Education (University/College - Skilled - Assigned based on University ranking globally) 4. Employment Offer / Salary based points 5. Prior Employment History in selected fields (American University can be duplicated and applied for these points as well). 6. Age 7. Marital Status (Married - your wife has her points calculated and then combined and divided by 2) Figure out the immigration target level - divide it by 12 (monthly) and then those that have the most points in the month of the application get approved in that month. An employer may make another job offer the following month and your status could be evaluated in the following month (it would rely on a patient employer). The system would encourage talent to immigrate or those with American University degrees to be ranked highly. The H1B would become redundant then.

      It takes around 1-1.5 years to get the green card. 2 months for PWD, 2 months recruitment, 4-5 months for PERM and 5-8 months for AOS. You could be done around a year.

      US has quotas for each of the different types of family and employment based green cards and are issued by first come first served basis and not by points. The point based system is the Canadian immigration system now being suggested by the Trump administration for US.

  22. Slaves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slaves were paid too. From what I understand, they tended to DIE if you didn't feed and house them.

  23. Far Cry 1 Download by malikb2017 · · Score: 0
  24. "New" data, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, we are no longer suppressing / hiding / ignoring or deliberately failing to collect the data which surely already existed.

    1. Re:"New" data, eh? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      As the summary states, previous administrations simply didn't allow them to collect the data.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  25. Labour Protectionism is not the answer by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

    Younger workers are have been under employed since I was a kid -- long before H1B visas were an issue (30 years). Many workers in any field are just not worth employing -- especially in the tech industry where productivity of the top worker is often a rather high multiple of the lowest worker.

    Protectionism that blocks foreign skilled talent will only hurt American businesses which will have a further knock on when it comes to secondary employment, taxation etc. If the foreign worker is in demand and yet cannot be employed in the US because of protectionism -- it will only encourage the company to setup offices in places where they can employ the people they need (whether it be offshore or just to the north).

    I am not saying there isn't abuse in the H1B visa category -- there obviously is... protectionism for the sake of protectionism is not the answer.

    1. Re: Labour Protectionism is not the answer by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      I'm solidly a free trader...but your working from a bad premise. I'm a consultant that works with companies of all types, including the big tech companies, and my experience is that overall fewer than 2 in 10 H1b workers are "highly skilled". It's really unbelievable how bad the situation is.

    2. Re: Labour Protectionism is not the answer by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I'm solidly a free trader...but your working from a bad premise. I'm a consultant that works with companies of all types, including the big tech companies, and my experience is that overall fewer than 2 in 10 H1b workers are "highly skilled". It's really unbelievable how bad the situation is.

      I live in Belfast and it's unbelievable how anyone who has slightly any tech smarts in universities end up going on a H1B visa to the states. It's left Northern Ireland starved for tech talent, to the point that most of the tech workers you see are very incompetent over here because there are very few left. I'm not saying these people are geniuses, but it's scary that even the 'average' tech talent is getting gobbled up here by H1B visas.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  26. The failing argument for a degree by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Does a CCIE require a Masters degree?

    Can I sit for the MCSE exam with a high-school diploma?

    Does Oracle require a Bachelors degree to become a DBA?

    We need to drop this bullshit argument within the IT sector. 98% of the time, you're paying for the specialized skills.A perfect example of this is the utter lack of a degree requirement when hiring a technical consultant or contractor. Not everyone in IT is going to become a CxO, and most don't want to. Obtaining and keeping specialized skills honed is far more valuable for organizations needing it.

  27. H1-B Visa program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to drive programmer salary to nought.

  28. Neither of those had any practical effect by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the maximum number of H1-B visas was awarded this year as always. There's no sign of a drop for next year either. Putting a few hoops up doesn't change anything. The program needs to end.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  29. Filed under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh.

  30. News for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has now been obsessed with what I gather is a specific type of visa in the United States for several years, with very frequent posts, sometimes several times a week. It's not interesting and it's not relevant to the overwhelming majority of people. It is time to end the H-1B visa obsession. There are more interesting things in the world.

    1. Re:News for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American centered blog discusses American issues, news at 11.

      No one finds you interesting or relevant, so SHHHHHHH.

    2. Re: News for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bloody visa. It's not interested in the slightest. Why have several stories a week about it?

  31. Isn't this the whole point? by bravecanadian · · Score: 1

    If they had to pay the going rate they wouldn't bother in the first place.

  32. what about looking up commands or the exact name? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about looking up commands for cmd / cli stuff?
    the exact name of some tech?

  33. make the H1B min wage 80-150K+ based on COL by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    make the H1B min wage 80-150K+ based on COL.

    In some areas 80K is good others it's not so much.

    In the bay area they want 60K 50-60 hour a week workers and have a hard time finding USC at the rate so they have H1B's hired to be any where from code monkeys to higher level jobs.

    In some cases they have ways to pay them less then the now 60K min.

    I would not really want to take an job in bay area or NY NY for only 50K-60K

    1. Re:make the H1B min wage 80-150K+ based on COL by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      We have a similar shitshow with the TFW program in Canada. I've always said the solution is to force TFW/H1B positions to be paid 150% of market rate for the job, and paid through the TFW/equivalent office, who then pays the worker. The excess would then be used to fund the program and pay for career training programs to address the lack of local talent for those jobs.

      That way companies will look a little harder to see if there really is local talent before having to pony up 1.5 times the market rate for that foreign worker.

  34. Re:what about looking up commands or the exact nam by arth1 · · Score: 1

    what about looking up commands for cmd / cli stuff?

    It displays a lack of understanding. I don't want someone who needs to look up the man page for chown to figure out what the -h flag does. If he doesn't know it, it's fairly implausible that he has an inherent understanding of symlinks and challenges they may pose. I want someone who can look at a script or a program and see problems with it, not someone who can paint by number.

    the exact name of some tech?

    Ask the interviewer. An ability to ask meaningful questions scores a plus.

  35. time to unlike healthcare from jobs like the rest by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    time to unlike healthcare from jobs like the rest of the world

  36. This needs to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B is an abuse of the system and needs to be stopped. I have no problem with legal immigration and let everyone pay there taxes and compete in the marketplace, but H1B is destroying jobs.

  37. Market Value 101 !! by ripvlan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father always told me "don't get good at something you don't like to do" --- years later I'd learn that it was true, and B) don't ever get good at something that isn't valued (or can be automated).

    The low wages for these IT jobs is simply the Value That Companies Put on the Work. They need a semi-skilled laborer to write 'em some dumb code. Or push buttons for a manual testing effort. The cost of "now" vs "automate it" -- usually "now" wins. Regardless of how bad you may feel about somebody doing the same job for less -- realize this -- it's all the employer is willing to pay to get the job done.

    Don't get good at those jobs.

  38. Congress will simply use this data to extort by billrp · · Score: 1

    greater contributions from companies that rely on H1Bs

  39. HB1 helps me and the country more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company wants to hire cheaper labour, they have two main choices with foreigners; Outsourced to another country, or bring them on HB1.

    HB1 helps me and my country more:

    1) As a HB1 has to pay US cost of living they get paid higher than outsourced employees; making paying my wages more reasonable because there isn't a bigger gap.

    2) As a HB1 they pay US taxes, funding my government ( not somebody else's ), and giving me the benefits a well funded government can give me.

    3) As a HB1 they spend their money in the US buying food and lodging, making the US economy larger.

    4) The business stays in the US, and doesn't move to another country.

    An outsourced employee does none of that.

  40. that work needs to be an trade not 4+ years of CS by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    that work needs to be an trade not 4+ years of CS that is a poor fit for MCSE / CCIE / IT / help desk work.

  41. Yep, Trump may be a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I can't defend Silicon Valley, either. They are just as disengenuous and exploitative as anyone else. Why wouldn't they be? They are just the West Coast side of corporate America, after all, only slightly worse as they veil themselves in notions of moral rectitude and integrity. At least the other folks are honest, out in the open assholes. ;) Would love to see us regulate the poop out of all of them. I can dream.

  42. this is going to bite you on the arse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these H1-B workers are not as "skilled" as they claim!
    Poor code, poor practice and just horribly poor methods. This is going to be our downfall!!!
    Danger Will Robinson! Danger!!

  43. Re:You got to look at the reasons behind outsourci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rent on my 2 bedroom apartment is $1500 a month.

    Its one of the cheapest places in town to live that does not have a bug/drug/crime issue.

    $2000 a month would be impossible to live on and feed the family, much less save for a house.

  44. Re:Market Value 101 !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't make any sense.

    If an employer is "willing" to pay a programmer $100,000 to do a job that they need done, but someone is available who will do it for $30,000, the choice is obvious. If the $30,000 offer wasn't available to the employer, they'd pay someone else more, up to $100,000.

    The fact that an employer ends up paying a certain amount of money to get something done is entirely, completely, utterly unrelated to how much they 'value' the work.

    If someone from another political demarcation who's social contract includes alot less service, safety, and opportunity can freely give offers to another place with much higher standards and the associated costs, with no intervening boundaries, that person's offer will always win. To quickly jump into politics: Without those intervening boundaries, there is essentially no national self-determination.

  45. Re:what about looking up commands or the exact nam by sycodon · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between looking up what something does and looking up what the damned switch is to get it do do something you want it to do.

    Same with most other languages and utilities. Expecting people to keep the syntax diagrams and all the options in the heads is ridiculous. If they were at work and broke out the manual to look up function references, would that be acceptable?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  46. Re:Market Value 101 !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "ntirely, completely, utterly unrelated"

    So I regretted that phrasing because it also makes no sense. Instead, this long paragraph: ... is alone not any indicator how much they 'value' the work. It provides some indication in that the work is valued at *least* that much, but still provides a poor measure. A stated value cannot be trusted. An offer could be $100,000 but the employer ends up paying $120,000 since that was the lowest taker. Value is a non-trivial combination of supplier and demander negotiating a value. Equal footing of he negotiators and all that will impact the actual result, not the valuation.

  47. Re:Market Value 101 !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't ever get good at something that isn't valued (or can be automated).

    About that can be automated thing...

  48. Re: You got to look at the reasons behind outsourc by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    >>If you were earning $500/mo in the States, you would NOT have a house of your own and plenty of food. You would be living in a cardboard box under a bridge and eating out of dumpsters. Get real, broham.

    That's an uneducated utterance, simply because you cannot dictate how I live, nor can you know it, all you can do is assume that what I inform you of is either untrue or true.

    Here's an example. (the very truth, in my case): I own the house, my property taxes are roughly 300$ a year, thats less than 30 bucks a month. Food is roughly 100 bucks a month, can be 150 if I stretch it and eat really well. I pay utility bills like everyone else, one month I have to pay for garbage collection, that's roughly 100 bucks too, but it's only 4 times a year, so that comes down to 25$ a month. Then it's water and sewage costs - roughly the same. Insurance is the most expensive part, and cost me 450$ a year. So my total costs don't even exceed 500$ a month.

    I don't pay a mortgage - because the house is already mine, no bank loans - and no debt.

    This can be hard to understand (I live in Sweden btw, one of the highest taxed places on earth), but we do have some advantages, purchasing a house roughly 2 hours away from any major city is usually dirt cheap. I paid roughly 54K usd (yes fifty four thousand!) for my house 7 years ago, and it's a 3 story BRICK house! I bet you could get a decent trailer (mobile home) for that in certain places in the US, or a free fixer-upper in Detroit...what do I know? I just know my reality - the one I live every day.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  49. Re:what about looking up commands or the exact nam by arth1 · · Score: 1

    If they were at work and broke out the manual to look up function references, would that be acceptable?

    That depends on how intrinsic it is to the work they are doing. Understanding based on wetware-retained knowledge means you're able to spot potential problems. Like when someone forgets that crucial dereferencing option.
    And you won't spend 80 hours on a code review, looking up every little thing, while missing the big elephant because all you have is the ability to look up individual things, not the understanding of the big picture which can only be complete when you already know the parts.

  50. Re:time to unlike healthcare from jobs like the re by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    time to unlike healthcare from jobs like the rest of the world

    I think you meant "unlink". It could happen, now that the government was unable to change anything so far. People want certainty. Especially with health care. The majority do NOT trust the government any more with respect to health care - which is why this has a chance to catch on finally

    Bernie Sanders pushes universal health plan in wake of Republican repeal failure

    Bernie Sanders has spent the first months of the new Congress defending Barack Obama’s health reforms as Republicans vowed to repeal them. But after the GOP’s seven-year drive to eliminate the Affordable Care Act collapsed on the Senate floor last week, Sanders is ready to introduce his own solution - government-run universal healthcare for all Americans.

    The Vermont senator will spend the next several weeks leading a campaign to build support for his plan before unveiling the bill next month. On Wednesday, he launched a six-figure digital advertising campaign on Facebook and Google that encourages supporters to become "citizen co-sponsors" of his plan, which he calls "Medicare for All", according to Sanders spokesman Josh Miller-Lewis, a reference to the public healthcare program for older Americans.

    "Bottom line is: if other countries around the world are providing quality care to all their people, we can do the same," Sanders told NPR in an interview on Tuesday.

    Surveys show people want this. And with the total failure of the current regime to get anything done, it will be a delicious irony if Trump's stupidity ultimately results in the US bringing health care supply into the second half of the 20th century.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  51. Re:H1B indo-chimps get paid less on paper by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    But you have to pay someone to clean up the shit in the parking lot.

    Or just stop hiring people who shit in the parking lot in the first place. Or you can pay them to crap in toilets.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  52. I'll just drop this here by r1348 · · Score: 1
  53. Re:what about looking up commands or the exact nam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol I know how symlinks down to the fs level and how hardlinks work down to the inode and I can't tell you what the -h flag does for chown jesus christ.

    I just looked it up.. like how fucking often does anyone need to chown a symlink? This is the sort of thing I might need to worry about dicking around at home maybe once in a blue moon.

    You're actually a shitty interviewer.

  54. Duh... by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    See the comment's subject. No further comment needed.

  55. Let's see if people put 2 and 2 together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data released for the first time.... Trump's merit-based immigration announcement...MAGA.....

    Maybe Obama, and all previous administrations, we're not really your friends. Sure, he's coarse and to the point the way New Yorkers of his generation were and Obama was a smooth rhetoritician but what do they DO?

    This THIS is why we elected Trump. It's about old fashioned, basic fairness, frank truth telling and opportunity.

    1. Re:Let's see if people put 2 and 2 together by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      What?
      Immigration based on "Economic Security" points?
      This is "Fairness"?
      in a pigs (Trump's) Eye!!!

  56. End H1B; open the boarder and lets compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an artificial imbalance of power created by H1B where employers can pay less because should an H1B employee decide they're not getting paid enough they can't quit without having to leave the country. If we open the boarder and allow for a free market the wages may go down in some cases - but there will still be high demand for skilled employees and even if there aren't we're better off adapting to competition as we'll become more competitive and able to compete with other countries. Look at the alternative- companies leave the US. We don't have much of an industrial base today because of it.

  57. Their degrees are worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, both working for Cognizant & working with other outsourcing company staff, the minions' degrees are no better than paper mill. This is my first hand experience with programmers, software admins & network engineers. It was a rarity to find one person in each category that actually knew the subject matter. The rest were just oxygen combustion units following knowledge trees and monkey manuals.

  58. Re:You got to look at the reasons behind outsourci by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    sometimes I only get 500$ a month to live on

    But how much do you normally get?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  59. Expel Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  60. Re:Market Value 101 !! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I think we're saying the same thing. Just because an employer has to pay $100k for a job doesn't mean they "want" to pay that much. It's worth $30k to them but they can't find anybody near by willing to do that.

    So they go looking for somebody willing to take the job for less. Or realize that the work isn't something they want to do and that consolidation is necessary and the only way to achieve that is through outsourcing the service.

    We had a skill that was semi-valued but not at a full-time level. So management kept asking the expert to do other tasks that he really wasn't trained in nor wanted to learn. He left the company seeing no growth and was never replaced. Years later in the midst of quality problems a senior manager asked "what does John's testing effort tell us?" -- "Oh, John quit a year ago, we haven't been doing his kind of testing since."