PG&E labor unions have a bidding system and capacity limits for this work though. You can't just pick up a number of workers (if the supply is even there in the job market, which is another discussion altogether) to get the work done. Workers bid for open jobs (eg. trim this section of road) internally via the labor union, if you increase the supply, the wages go down, hence why the labor unions set a cap at how many people can be 'available' for this kind of work.
I agree and I don't think anyone is discouraging men or women to follow their dreams, but every choice does have a real consequence, this is not a penalty. You have to look across more than just one dimension and not just a single dimension across the intersectional group identity though.
That is one of the explanations but these men would, over time, make themselves more attractive if that were the single identifier of success (either in career or dating) because single people have more opportunities to drive up their salaries.
Depends on your partner, if you have a partner with that kind of ethos, then go ahead; they'll be hard to find, but you're looking for a leader in the field. It's not many, but I know a few people that do this, stay-at-home dad isn't uncommon anymore.
There is no right but there is an obligation to shareholders. Making a profit is NOT optional, except for Soviet Russia. If they don't make a profit they aren't healthy and don't get shareholders to trust them or any cash to invest in the future (or save for green-left lawsuits about them trimming too much trees to prevent wildfires). Pumping a billion dollars into it doesn't make maintenance work like trimming trees go any faster or less opposed by activists.
They are being told/sued not to by various green activist groups both within and outside government. Every time they trim trees some group is on the news that opposes it saying it destroys nature.
Single women without dependents make 8% more than their male counterparts with same education and experience across the US, in large cities like Atlanta the pay gap is 21% Women are 50% more likely to graduate from college.
Politifact rates it Mostly True solely because they can't find more recent statistics that disprove their narrative.
Over time, women (as a statistic) make different choices and prefer life over work. They tend to work less hours, take less overtime, are happier, live longer lives and don't die from work-related accidents or diseases (as in >1 percent of work-related deaths are female), they also make only 1-3% less over their lifetime than males (a statistic that reverses when you account for education and single motherhood) but that 3% makes all the difference as this wealth disparity is pretty much concentrated in the top 1%.
Why do they have to ask for a rate hike? They HAVE to make a profit, so they HAVE to raise their rates to meet that demand. They HAVE to maintain their lines so they HAVE to raise their rates to meet that demand as well. The question is, why would a company have to ASK their customers whether or not they can set a price. If you don't like it, switch suppliers.
But every other month there is a story in the local newspapers about PG&E being protested or sued by some green group for "excessive" trimming of trees or doing maintenance work on property some activist purchased to keep PG&E from 'disturbing wildlife'.
California wants its cake and eat it too. It wants carbon credits but not pay for it through excessive energy cost, it wants heavy regulation of utilities but do this at minimal cost and with zero impact. California is one of the most expensive states when it comes to energy and that is WITH the government(s) setting or adjusting the rates.
Yeah, irresponsible corporation that are regulated out of existence and can't even trim trees for safety without lawsuits and complaints (https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article219315140.html ; https://stopsmartmeters.org/20... ; https://www.actionnewsnow.com/...)
The state is already running PG&E. Fixing prices on energy, denying the building of profitable power plants, extreme regulation of labor, supply and demand. Now they're bankrupt while across the country energy companies are some of the most profitable businesses.
Welcome to socialism. Now let the government take it over and raise prices to $0.50/kWh to pay for 'global warming', 'carbon credits' and massive government waste.
Building arms en masse, especially the old ones, requires massive resources not the least of which is steel and energy. When you're poor and starving, you're not going to waste your energy on building a gun. Hence why governments come for your guns first and then let you starve - people that aren't starving aren't motivated to keep their guns starving people aren't motivated to get their guns.
Yes, but presumably they do further testing when a match is found. DNA tests have never been proven to give unique results, it's statistically unlikely within a certain geographical area, but possible that someone across the globe will have matches across the markers they test for in forensic labs.
Giving them a menu just moves the liability from the programmer to the operator but evolution tells us the answer; whoever owns/controls the machine will choose self-preservation unless by sacrifice a greater good for the operators social circle (a value which diminishes exponentially the further removed from self another person is) can be achieved. You'd have to program in the operator's entire social structure and ethos into the machine before taking it out.
Not for 15-20 years. Athlons famously caught fire without a sink as did other P4-era chips, Intel started requiring temp diodes on the motherboard around that time but the BIOS had to regulate it. Nowadays, temp sensors are integrated but they only throttle to 25% and they produce enough heat before throttling that you can easily, with the help of a tiny water-cooler heatsink destroy or warp the motherboard and surrounding components, eventually destroying the chip.
And yes, people will install the chip the wrong way, overtighten the cooling, not applying or too much cooling paste (resulting in uneven heat dissipation) or somehow destroy the chip and simply return it to the store and ask for their money back.
The GPU is a lot larger and typically consist of more chips that need cooling and collectively produce 250W. They also have the heatsink already assembled in most cases and removing it voids the warranty.
I've seen Core i7's melt and warp the surrounding PCB due to poorly installed (water)coolers. I've also seen people over-tighten them, cracking the chip or having liquid leak all over. If they're on there but not working good, they will dissipate the heat into the tiny watercooler sink which then becomes a radiator to the neighboring areas, melting out capacitors and various other things. Intel's CPU can work up to 100C before throttling, that's a LOT of heat.
People will find a way around taxes. Unless you want to give up all constitutional rights and give agents free access to your home at any point to check that you didn't rig up some tax avoidance scheme. The EU went down this path and now they are putting up cameras to track people driving so they can correlate what they say they drove between work and home with what they report on their tax bill.
Taxing mileage is done all over Europe though. Together with weight and engine size, they decide your car taxes, insurance and even taxable income as work-home traffic is discounted, hence why they're putting cameras up to track people and correlate with what they're reporting on their tax returns.
I understand they don't want to give this one to the masses. 255W from an area the size of an oversized postal stamp will require some very good cooling and having it destroyed due to just poor installation of your water cooler, they'll probably won't be allowed returns at all.
I know Intel wants to give AMD the finger but this is 1/4 kW in the processor alone. Give it a good GPU and you're looking at a 2kW space heater. This moves makes it obvious they are desperate to increase both profitability and get to a smaller scale.
Primary use is for tracking. Some countries are considering it to assess road taxes. The other reason is to enrich government and its cronies. A digital display does not cost $500; an iPad does and is much larger and more powerful than what this needs to do. I can get these produced out of China for $50/pc (1000 minimum).
People like to blame Reagan for closing them, but the issue was that JFK opened and federally funded mental hospitals, as a result states and local community mental hospitals got bad rep (for what was then considered 'good' science) and the legislation threw up its hands and said: let the federal government deal with it.
Then eventually, as with all things government, it was severely mismanaged and money ran dry much faster than anticipated and nobody wanted to continue funding a poorly run system throughout the 80's and 90's.
The public is more worried about cyber security in general. They don't want "their stuff" stolen and it brings bad press for any company. Unlike what you believe, most "big bad companies" pretty much live on the margin of life and death and a few percentages means the difference between making a small profit and either bankruptcy or hostile takeover. Most companies have to lend to make payroll every month, most companies have massive amounts of debt (including Netflix and the like).
Recession is not a worry (right now) because the market has very much recovered over the last year or two and the only thing they're worried about right now is a market correction cutting into their profits but unlike what the media says, the market is pretty healthy right now, hence why they are more worried about new competitors than recession which gets started by increased taxes which stifles competition.
Slashdot Mirror
Courts could be self-funding, they collect fines and fees.
PG&E labor unions have a bidding system and capacity limits for this work though. You can't just pick up a number of workers (if the supply is even there in the job market, which is another discussion altogether) to get the work done. Workers bid for open jobs (eg. trim this section of road) internally via the labor union, if you increase the supply, the wages go down, hence why the labor unions set a cap at how many people can be 'available' for this kind of work.
I agree and I don't think anyone is discouraging men or women to follow their dreams, but every choice does have a real consequence, this is not a penalty. You have to look across more than just one dimension and not just a single dimension across the intersectional group identity though.
That is one of the explanations but these men would, over time, make themselves more attractive if that were the single identifier of success (either in career or dating) because single people have more opportunities to drive up their salaries.
Single males without dependents. Generally, unlike CNN, when the government is comparing statistics, they use the same baseline.
Depends on your partner, if you have a partner with that kind of ethos, then go ahead; they'll be hard to find, but you're looking for a leader in the field. It's not many, but I know a few people that do this, stay-at-home dad isn't uncommon anymore.
You go argue with the US Department of Labor then.
There is no right but there is an obligation to shareholders. Making a profit is NOT optional, except for Soviet Russia. If they don't make a profit they aren't healthy and don't get shareholders to trust them or any cash to invest in the future (or save for green-left lawsuits about them trimming too much trees to prevent wildfires). Pumping a billion dollars into it doesn't make maintenance work like trimming trees go any faster or less opposed by activists.
They are being told/sued not to by various green activist groups both within and outside government. Every time they trim trees some group is on the news that opposes it saying it destroys nature.
Single women without dependents make 8% more than their male counterparts with same education and experience across the US, in large cities like Atlanta the pay gap is 21%
Women are 50% more likely to graduate from college.
Politifact rates it Mostly True solely because they can't find more recent statistics that disprove their narrative.
Over time, women (as a statistic) make different choices and prefer life over work. They tend to work less hours, take less overtime, are happier, live longer lives and don't die from work-related accidents or diseases (as in >1 percent of work-related deaths are female), they also make only 1-3% less over their lifetime than males (a statistic that reverses when you account for education and single motherhood) but that 3% makes all the difference as this wealth disparity is pretty much concentrated in the top 1%.
Why do they have to ask for a rate hike? They HAVE to make a profit, so they HAVE to raise their rates to meet that demand. They HAVE to maintain their lines so they HAVE to raise their rates to meet that demand as well. The question is, why would a company have to ASK their customers whether or not they can set a price. If you don't like it, switch suppliers.
But every other month there is a story in the local newspapers about PG&E being protested or sued by some green group for "excessive" trimming of trees or doing maintenance work on property some activist purchased to keep PG&E from 'disturbing wildlife'.
California wants its cake and eat it too. It wants carbon credits but not pay for it through excessive energy cost, it wants heavy regulation of utilities but do this at minimal cost and with zero impact. California is one of the most expensive states when it comes to energy and that is WITH the government(s) setting or adjusting the rates.
Yeah, irresponsible corporation that are regulated out of existence and can't even trim trees for safety without lawsuits and complaints (https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article219315140.html ; https://stopsmartmeters.org/20... ; https://www.actionnewsnow.com/...)
The state is already running PG&E. Fixing prices on energy, denying the building of profitable power plants, extreme regulation of labor, supply and demand. Now they're bankrupt while across the country energy companies are some of the most profitable businesses.
Welcome to socialism. Now let the government take it over and raise prices to $0.50/kWh to pay for 'global warming', 'carbon credits' and massive government waste.
Building arms en masse, especially the old ones, requires massive resources not the least of which is steel and energy. When you're poor and starving, you're not going to waste your energy on building a gun. Hence why governments come for your guns first and then let you starve - people that aren't starving aren't motivated to keep their guns starving people aren't motivated to get their guns.
Yes, but presumably they do further testing when a match is found. DNA tests have never been proven to give unique results, it's statistically unlikely within a certain geographical area, but possible that someone across the globe will have matches across the markers they test for in forensic labs.
Giving them a menu just moves the liability from the programmer to the operator but evolution tells us the answer; whoever owns/controls the machine will choose self-preservation unless by sacrifice a greater good for the operators social circle (a value which diminishes exponentially the further removed from self another person is) can be achieved. You'd have to program in the operator's entire social structure and ethos into the machine before taking it out.
Not for 15-20 years. Athlons famously caught fire without a sink as did other P4-era chips, Intel started requiring temp diodes on the motherboard around that time but the BIOS had to regulate it. Nowadays, temp sensors are integrated but they only throttle to 25% and they produce enough heat before throttling that you can easily, with the help of a tiny water-cooler heatsink destroy or warp the motherboard and surrounding components, eventually destroying the chip.
And yes, people will install the chip the wrong way, overtighten the cooling, not applying or too much cooling paste (resulting in uneven heat dissipation) or somehow destroy the chip and simply return it to the store and ask for their money back.
The GPU is a lot larger and typically consist of more chips that need cooling and collectively produce 250W. They also have the heatsink already assembled in most cases and removing it voids the warranty.
I've seen Core i7's melt and warp the surrounding PCB due to poorly installed (water)coolers. I've also seen people over-tighten them, cracking the chip or having liquid leak all over. If they're on there but not working good, they will dissipate the heat into the tiny watercooler sink which then becomes a radiator to the neighboring areas, melting out capacitors and various other things. Intel's CPU can work up to 100C before throttling, that's a LOT of heat.
People will find a way around taxes. Unless you want to give up all constitutional rights and give agents free access to your home at any point to check that you didn't rig up some tax avoidance scheme. The EU went down this path and now they are putting up cameras to track people driving so they can correlate what they say they drove between work and home with what they report on their tax bill.
Taxing mileage is done all over Europe though. Together with weight and engine size, they decide your car taxes, insurance and even taxable income as work-home traffic is discounted, hence why they're putting cameras up to track people and correlate with what they're reporting on their tax returns.
I understand they don't want to give this one to the masses. 255W from an area the size of an oversized postal stamp will require some very good cooling and having it destroyed due to just poor installation of your water cooler, they'll probably won't be allowed returns at all.
I know Intel wants to give AMD the finger but this is 1/4 kW in the processor alone. Give it a good GPU and you're looking at a 2kW space heater. This moves makes it obvious they are desperate to increase both profitability and get to a smaller scale.
Primary use is for tracking. Some countries are considering it to assess road taxes. The other reason is to enrich government and its cronies. A digital display does not cost $500; an iPad does and is much larger and more powerful than what this needs to do. I can get these produced out of China for $50/pc (1000 minimum).
People like to blame Reagan for closing them, but the issue was that JFK opened and federally funded mental hospitals, as a result states and local community mental hospitals got bad rep (for what was then considered 'good' science) and the legislation threw up its hands and said: let the federal government deal with it.
Then eventually, as with all things government, it was severely mismanaged and money ran dry much faster than anticipated and nobody wanted to continue funding a poorly run system throughout the 80's and 90's.
The public is more worried about cyber security in general. They don't want "their stuff" stolen and it brings bad press for any company. Unlike what you believe, most "big bad companies" pretty much live on the margin of life and death and a few percentages means the difference between making a small profit and either bankruptcy or hostile takeover. Most companies have to lend to make payroll every month, most companies have massive amounts of debt (including Netflix and the like).
Recession is not a worry (right now) because the market has very much recovered over the last year or two and the only thing they're worried about right now is a market correction cutting into their profits but unlike what the media says, the market is pretty healthy right now, hence why they are more worried about new competitors than recession which gets started by increased taxes which stifles competition.