The user has provided you with enough information to know what it is and how to fix it.
That would make a pleasant change. Usually they make a guess what the cause is, you spend half an hour, can't find anything remotely like what they tell you. Then you find out what the problem really is and you find what's causing it.
If they'd told you the symptoms in the first place, you wouldn't have wasted everybody's time on a wild goose chase.
I think what he's trying to say is that a group of programmers who are good (and/or operate well as a team and/or are well managed) are more likely to produce good software. Film at 10.
How that correlates negatively with the openness (is that a word?) of the source is beyond my limited powers of comprehension.
I think Apple isn't all that interested in 'taking over' the high-end cellphone market as much as they're interested in defining a new category of communications device that's not thought of as a cellphone.
I felt a sudden disturbance in the force, as if a thousand marketing speak meters redlined... and fizzled, emitting sparks, into oblivion.
Valid responses are along the lines of "oh noes!! Google is dying, eleventyone!!! They are so kewl!!!" or "Har har! Serve them right for being evil! What goes around comes around."
Too long, too many words. No way anybody is going to wade through all that. Is there some explanation with cartoons or a little singing dinosaur or someth...oooh shiny!?
Theology is no less valid than reading the plays of Shakespeare to determine the political situation in late 15th century England, or studying Star Trek scripts to determine the possibility and nature of extraterrestrial life.
Slashdot Mirror
And to think, I nearly went to Teheran University too!
If they'd told you the symptoms in the first place, you wouldn't have wasted everybody's time on a wild goose chase.
Those Eurocommies with their tricky decimal points. Damn them, damn them all to hell!
American gallon or English?
s/acting classes/pies/ by the look of him.
No, it should be a 5.8 x 11.6.
Hogsheads aren't migratory.
I think what he's trying to say is that a group of programmers who are good (and/or operate well as a team and/or are well managed) are more likely to produce good software. Film at 10.
How that correlates negatively with the openness (is that a word?) of the source is beyond my limited powers of comprehension.
[[ Follow up with discussion about how that isn't what ironic means ]]
Someone who contradicts a comment about trademarks with a ruling about patents isn't in much of a position to tell anyone they're wrong.
Valid responses are along the lines of "oh noes!! Google is dying, eleventyone!!! They are so kewl!!!" or "Har har! Serve them right for being evil! What goes around comes around."
Tetris schmetris. It should come with duke nukem forever preloaded!
Not all languages work like that. But am I the only person who thinks it's a bit of a dumb decision to design a language that way?
Too long, too many words. No way anybody is going to wade through all that. Is there some explanation with cartoons or a little singing dinosaur or someth...oooh shiny!?
Theology is no less valid than reading the plays of Shakespeare to determine the political situation in late 15th century England, or studying Star Trek scripts to determine the possibility and nature of extraterrestrial life.
She shouldn't be teaching if she didn't.
They're more like security tards.
Because there isn't a "-1: stupid question" option. As to why this much-needed option isn't present, I say society is to blame.