Slashdot Mirror


First Look At Final OLPC Design

blackbearnh writes "At the Consumer Electronics Show on Monday, AMD hosted a presentation of the final Industrial Prototype (Beta 1) of the One Laptop Per Child XO Laptop. Linux Today has extensive reporting, including new photos and details about power consumption, networking, and the logistics of distributing and servicing what will be the largest rollout of any computing platform in history: 5 million units in the first year. This will represent nearly a 10% increase in the total worldwide laptop production for 2007."

224 comments

  1. Design issue alert! by zanderredux · · Score: 2, Funny
    You have to look at this through the needs of a child [in the developing world]. A child doesn't want to play the latest video games. he wants to be able to read a book.
    It seems that they got the design requirements wrong! Where I came from, people couldn't care less about books as long as they could play Tetris....
    1. Re:Design issue alert! by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tetris schmetris. It should come with duke nukem forever preloaded!

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    2. Re:Design issue alert! by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Tetris is hardly "latest".

    3. Re:Design issue alert! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Does anybody want a computer to read books? There's already a perfectly good device for reading books. It's called a book. Computers are great. They're interactive and versatile. But they shouldn't be seen as a replacement for books. Books are great too and there are a lot of them not avaialable on a computer.

    4. Re:Design issue alert! by starwed · · Score: 1

      These computers are cheaper than a big stack of textbooks, though. I think that's the main point of them.

      And note that the article itself mentions that part of the project is getting media for these machines. (And apparently Mexico converts a lot of Spanish language textbooks into e-books.)

    5. Re:Design issue alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books cost. Much. Once the laptop distribution has been done, distributing an ebook file over the mesh costs almost zero).

    6. Re:Design issue alert! by Curien · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Books are also very expensive. Even in mass production, a non-trivial book can cost around $20 each, and smaller run books are much more expensive due to (lack of) economy of scale.

      Not to mention that large-scale distribution is not inexpensive, especially in the market areas for one of these laptops (poor infrastructure makes shipping more expensive). I imagine a government could actually save a good amount of money (if the laptops prove successful and long-lasting) by giving school children one of these laptops and then just having digital textbooks.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    7. Re:Design issue alert! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly. It's the same as with girls. The digital version is much cheaper than the exteriorized rib edition.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Design issue alert! by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's great, until you realize that ebooks hardly cost less than physical books.

      I'll admit that there's quite a few free ebooks, but the majority of them are 'literary classics' that a child couldn't read if it wanted to and college-level textbooks that a child couldn't read if it wanted to.

      If they can get some ebook publishers to donate books for use on these OLPCs that'll be great, but I'm not holding my breath. With the exception of MIT, Gutenberg and Baen.com, I haven't seen a lot of generosity in the form of books. (Physical or electronic.)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    9. Re:Design issue alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to get out more

    10. Re:Design issue alert! by slim · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the OLPC crowd count as a "child" but by the age of 14 a bright child could probably tackle as many Gutenberg type "literary classics" as many adults: if they were interested. Alice in Wonderland is in the Gutenberg archive; I'm sure there are many more children's books there too. Something like Frankenstein contains some ponderous language, but still has the capacity to grip a developing reader.

      TFA also mentions that the Mexican government is working towards providing all curriculum textbooks as OLPC compatible ebooks.

    11. Re:Design issue alert! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Are the computers really cheaper than the textbooks, or are they just cheaper than buying books off the publishing companies? It's not that expensive to print something out on paper. You can buy some pretty thick books for under $10.00, and that's with the cost of a nice shiny cover, retail space, salesperson wages, and a bunch of other unnecessary stuff built in. I think the money could go a lot further if it went towards the publishing of free textbooks, which could be produced very cheaply and given or sold for cost to these countries. The stuff you learn in the first 16 years of your life dpesn't changed all that much. It would be much better to just sell the countries cheap textbooks. The laptops will all be broken within 3 years, and they'll have to buy new ones. Whereas, if they had bought textbooks, some of them might be in bad condition, and might need to be rebound, but I don't think they would end up completely broken like many of the laptops will.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:Design issue alert! by ericlondaits · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live in Argentina, which is one of the target countries for OLPC. Daily through the streets of Buenos Aires I come across many many indigent children who either beg for money, perform little juggling acts for coins, sell small items or collect cardboard and other materials from the trash which they later sell. These kids were usually found as well in Arcades, playing with some hard earned coins, out of someone's good will, or hungrily peeking over someone's shoulder. They normally play real good and act as on-site advisers for kids with money to play. When Arcades started disappearing in favor of small joints dedicated to on-line games, they moved over... and now they sometimes spend hard earned change for an hour of Counterstrike (historically the most successful on-line game for this kind of places). ... So I assure you... poor kids certainly do care about games, and I have no reason to think they'd rather read a book.

      And if you aim higher, towards the working class children, the lower middle class, or middle class, then there's no question either: as a rule kids don't like to read in this country. I think it's likely that overall children books are less popular here than in the US, and reading in adults is less popular as well. Kids normally don't like school or studying (no surprise here, I guess), and they avoid it as much as they can. We don't have SAT exams here, or any other kind of exam which require a certain level (except for some high schools which have an acceptance exam), so most kids stick to getting marks just high enough as to pass the class.

      So I can't imagine why someone would think that kids would rather use the computer to read a book than to play games. What I would believe, is that many kids would rather chat and browse through social network sites (Fotolog.com is very popular in Argentina and Brasil) than play games. Girls specially. In fact, I'm really happy that thanks to SMS and IM apps, kids now have a reason to read and write ten times more than they did before... even if they do it in garbled kl00l3z-5p34k. I'd like teachers to embrace this fact and help kids improve their on-line writing.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    13. Re:Design issue alert! by kfg · · Score: 1

      I was reading the Illiad and Bhaghava-Gita at 11, because there was no one around to tell me I wasn't advanced enough. Dickens, Twain, Conan Doyle; piece of cake; although perhaps my favorite work was the Larousse Encyclopedia of Astronomy. I lugged that puppy most of the way from Cananda to Guatamala. That one's not in the public domain, but most of the material in it is.

      It's amazing what a kid can accomplish if there isn't someone force feeding him "age appropriate" material at a graded rate. The modern American education is actually designed to hold you back.

      KFG

    14. Re:Design issue alert! by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ***It seems that they got the design requirements wrong! Where I came from, people couldn't care less about books as long as they could play Tetris....***

      Of course the kids are going to use the OLPC to play Tetris and other games. It's not an either Tetris or read "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch" thing. The OLPC looks to be able to do both, and it's a safe bet that it will be used for both.

      When I worked in a K-8 school, I asked some teachers if I should take Solitaire of the Windows machines. Some didn't care. Some WANTED it on the machines so the kids could play it at appropriate times. Nobody wanted it to be disappeared.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    15. Re:Design issue alert! by hahiss · · Score: 1


      I'm a bit of a bibliophile, so I'm totally sympathetic here. However, if you don't have access to a (real, physical!) library AND you have a computer with network access, then you have access to a *ton* of books electronically---many of which are available for free.

      I don't live in the third world, just a ruralish part of SW Pennsylvania , and having the access to electronic texts means that my access to texts far outstrips my university's ability to store such documents (especially academic journals). I prefer to read them on paper, for sure, but if the choice is between no access and only electronic access, I vote for electronic access.

      I should add that I can carry more electronic texts with me on a laptop than I can in my bag. Heck, an electronic copy of Unix Power Tols is lighter than the print copy---and that includes the weight of my laptop! ;)

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    16. Re:Design issue alert! by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember that even if the electronic edition costs the same per child, the non-trivial costs of transportation will be removed from the equation.

      If you take out some or part of the cost of printing, the deal becomes even sweeter.

      This is a win-win situation - the price of the books go down because they don't need to be printed. This means more books are sold at a possibly higher profit margin. The books can get as large as needed because they are not on paper - encyclopedias can grow to unlimited size. The children have more books because the government can afford more and thus, I hope, the children get a better education and economy improves. And because they don't pollute when are made or transported, the environment wins.

      Come on... It's an easy sell.

    17. Re:Design issue alert! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If they can get some ebook publishers to donate books for use on these OLPCs that'll be great, but I'm not holding my breath.

      Or just develop them at cost. Considering that basic education books are mostly a "write once" project, I'm surprised by the costs. How much would it really cost if you can spread the cost over 5 million PCs? I mean there's not even that many people in my country, and it still happens somehow (but ok we're rich).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:Design issue alert! by swillden · · Score: 1

      That's great, until you realize that ebooks hardly cost less than physical books.

      Which is another problem that needs to be fixed. There's absolutely no reason in the world why we shouldn't have a complete set of open content textbooks covering all of a basic liberal education. Public and private schools spend ridiculous amounts of money on books that contain basic knowledge that's been known for decades, even centuries, and there's no good reason for it other than to line the pockets of scholastic publishers.

      Sure, writing books takes effort, but it's an effort that only needs to be performed once. Rather than buying what the publishers have to offer, the public school systems should commission the creation of the necessary texts, hiring the writers directly and placing the result in the public domain. Then, when they need printed texts, they should put out a request for competitive bids and buy the books from the publisher who can produce the printed, bound copies for the best price and with adequate quality (and durability). The cost of printing a high-quality, hardcover textbook is less than ten dollars, but schools presently pay three to five times that much because they're buying the content, not just the printing.

      US public schools collectively spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year on textbooks. If we're very conservative and assume that it's only $100M per year, and that paying for printing only, not content, only reduces the price by 50%, that still leaves $50M per year for commissioning of new or updated texts. You can pay more than 200 full-time textbook writers and editors for that much.

      And for students who can use e-books, the printing costs can be eliminated as well! Finally, given a reasonably well-written basis to start from, much of the maintenance and enhancement of open-content textbooks can be done by the teachers themselves, a la wikibooks. The schools would probably be wise to pitch in a little cash and hire some professional editors and subject matter specialists to oversee the process, but that would cost very, very little when divided across, for example, all of the school districts in all of the states in the US.

      Bringing this back to the OLPC project, the solution is obvious. The same nations that buy these laptops for their kids should also set aside a little of their textbook budget every year for producing open-content textbooks to be delivered in electronic format (or in printed format for kids that don't have the laptops). Particularly with international cooperation and the assistance of the teachers (and perhaps even the students!), after only a few years there would be a complete set of native-language texts for basic education.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Design issue alert! by starwed · · Score: 1

      No, I think it really is cheaper than the textbooks. Especially when you factor in the ability to hold so many classic works. (The laptops are supposed to be pretty damn durable; no moving parts inside.)

    20. Re:Design issue alert! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      My cell phone doesn't have any moving parts either. That doesn't stop the fact that accidentally dropping it, or banging it up against something will cause it to break. Things happen to computers, especially laptops. Sure they'll last 3 or 4 years, maybe longer, but There's books at my local library that are over 50 years old. I doubt that the laptop will last that long. What about batteries. I haven't seen a battery that lasts beyond 3 years of frequent charge/discharge cycles.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:Design issue alert! by smithbp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that there is a benefit to reading outside of your "age-appropriate" level. When I was 10, I picked up novels that I saw in a bookstore and my father would be more than happy to oblige getting it for me to read. It's important to develop a reading habit and love in a child at an early age. The only thing that frightens me about the OLPC model for book distribution is that kids will associate reading with being in front of a PC to do it. There is nothing quite like getting a new book in your hands as a kid and looking at the cover, reading those first few pages, etc. The way that an ebook is delivered removes that experience from the equation. There's also the eyestrain from reading a book on a PC over a prolonged period of time to deal with as well. While it's a great idea to get the OLPC initiative into action and deployed, it is also going to cause all kinds of debates and overall bitching as time goes on.

    22. Re:Design issue alert! by tanakan · · Score: 1

      A *load* of children in developing countries just want to eat...

      This OLPC is just a cunning way of indirectly making money. The computer itself will not generate a lot a revenues but will bring new clients to other internet businesses.

    23. Re:Design issue alert! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way that an ebook is delivered removes that experience from the equation.

      The way books are delivered removes that experience from much of the world.

      KFG

    24. Re:Design issue alert! by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Right, because the whole point of the project is to have US ebook publishers sell books to kids in developing nations. Good think you pointed out that won't work!

    25. Re:Design issue alert! by scruffyMark · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA carefully, you'll note they mention that Mexico has been working hard on producing an electronic version of every textbook in their primay school curriculum. Which probably will mostly not be fascinating summer reading for the kids, but it gets the things to the point of being useful to schools. Over a year or two, the things could probably pay for themselves just in reduced book purchase costs to the state.

      --

      What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht

    26. Re:Design issue alert! by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      Seems like they would be more interested in eating than playing Tetris or reading books.

    27. Re:Design issue alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My late great grandfather was a missionary in bungo bungo land, he told me that when they gave books to all the fuzzy-wuzzies there they just used them for wiping their arses. At least you can't do that with a laptop!

    28. Re:Design issue alert! by deviq · · Score: 1

      But ebooks really do cost lest that physical books. In India, most of the textbooks are dirt cheap, even the printing costs are subsidised. this is atleast true. The reason is , in India, most of the books are written by writers commissioned by the government. So once they have written it , there is nothing such as author's royalty etc. etc. So I guess the ebooks can be really cheap.

    29. Re:Design issue alert! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That made me laugh too. It sums up the difference between the philosophies of people that make things that are to be bought by individual consumers, and people that make things that will be bought by governments and handed out for free.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    30. Re:Design issue alert! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      That's great, until you realize that ebooks hardly cost less than physical books. I'll admit that there's quite a few free ebooks, but the majority of them are 'literary classics' that a child couldn't read if it wanted to and college-level textbooks that a child couldn't read if it wanted to.

      fucking google it

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Design issue alert! by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that there's quite a few free ebooks, but the majority of them are 'literary classics' that a child couldn't read if it wanted to and college-level textbooks that a child couldn't read if it wanted to. And kids aren't smart enough to even use computers. ;)
    32. Re:Design issue alert! by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think YOU do. His cost-benefit analysis is pretty accurate from my data too.

    33. Re:Design issue alert! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "as a rule kids don't like to read in this country"

      Do you suppose that might be a good thing to address? I'm convinced that the reason I am successful today is because I'm a voracious reader. I'm also successful because I learned how to work computers in order to improve my Wing Commander gaming experience. It seems like the xo could indeed scratch both itches.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    34. Re:Design issue alert! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So, after you exclude three large free repositories of literature and knowledge, there aren't very many free repositories? Well, OK. I guess.

      The solution to the problem is not to complain, it is to find a classic that meant something to you as a child and transcribe it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    35. Re:Design issue alert! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "This OLPC is just a cunning way of indirectly making money"

      Gosh, let's put a stop to that right away. If people could make money, well, who KNOWS what they'd get up to next? They might want to, like, found liberal governments or something!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    36. Re:Design issue alert! by slocan · · Score: 1

      I assume the parent wrote about ebook versions of printed books, which governments already buy to give to students in public schools. It would make sense then.

      If these books were produced without the costs of printing and distributing physical books, they would certainly cost less, for they could be digitally copied and distributed.

      If ebooks sold to the general public actually do not cost less than their physical counterparts (I don't know if this is so), it's because the printing corporations are extracting even more profit buy charging relatively more, given the less work their employees have to produce and distribute ebooks, compared to the cost of producing and distributing physical books.

      I, for one, do think ebooks must be less expensive (given the reduced costs of production and distribution) -- even if ebooks have their own features and advantages over physical books, for they have disadvantages and lack features too.

    37. Re:Design issue alert! by mykdavies · · Score: 1

      "If they can get some ebook publishers to donate books for use on these OLPCs that'll be great, but I'm not holding my breath. With the exception of MIT, Gutenberg and Baen.com, I haven't seen a lot of generosity in the form of books. (Physical or electronic.)"

      FTFA: According to Bletsas, Latin America is in the best shape, due to Mexico's aggressive initiative to produce an electronic library of all of their text books.
      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    38. Re:Design issue alert! by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      Since I was a child I love reading, and have done so a lot. I'm convinced about the benefits of reading itself as an activity (regardless of the subject matter of the book you're reading).

      Yet... I'm also convinced about the benefits of practicing sports, taking acting classes, taking singing lessons, learning how to play an instrument, studying hard science, doing outdoor activities, keeping up with current political issues and learning to debate, learning how to cook, taking art lessons (any discipline), learning electronics and/or hacking hardware, traveling to different countries, and countless other activities. Yet, though I do many of the activities I mentioned, I don't do every single one of them... and would never expect someone to do them all.

      What I'm not convinced of is that reading as a regular activity is more important than all of the others... even though it was very important for me. I believe than there might be different paths to exercising the brain, and the real problem would be apathy. Educators should encourage kids to read, but not consider it a panacea. They should instead try to develop the full potential of the kid through alternate paths which might be more appropriate for him.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    39. Re:Design issue alert! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Educators should encourage kids to read, but not consider it a panacea. They should instead try to develop the full potential of the kid through alternate paths which might be more appropriate for him."

      Well, of course. Having said that, the chances of being successful because you're smart and literate are much higher than your chances of being successful if you're a good football player. Or ballerina. Or whatever.

      I'd never for a moment suggest this system is a panacea. However, it's easy for me to imagine it being re-purposed by clever young people to do amazing things. I really want to see what they come up with.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    40. Re:Design issue alert! by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      Its all relative. They don't currently have anything better. Not to be an a-hole. But we could start them out with our 1980's games since they haven't seen anything as of yet...

      Then we can "release" games so that they always have fresh new games. We could choose the speed at which we leak the games too. We could do it fast so that think the game industry progresses VERY fast (although they have no reference). Then when we get them caught up, put all of their expectations into designing new games.

      Just in case this gets looked at out of context, I was speaking of the kids getting them in 3rd world countries.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    41. Re:Design issue alert! by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      Reading is for morons. TV is where its at...

      Wait, thats it...Instead of the OLPC initiative, I think I should found the OTVPC. Its soo much better to have your TV force feed you age appropriate material.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    42. Re:Design issue alert! by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      I've got my own theory. Reading has nothing to do with it. You had motivation to better yourself. Reading was just your vessel of choice. Vocabulary is a good thing and that shouldn't be downplayed, but I hate reading (for pleasure at least) and manage to do just fine.

      People who want to succeed and better themselves will. Gaining knowledge through reading is one way of doing it. Acquiring new skills, communicating with people and putting in effort is what separates the over achievers from the under achievers.

      I just re-read your post, and I completely agree...I started this after just reading the first paragraph (back to that whole not liking to read thing). So yeah, you pretty much nailed it. Maybe you should write a book...and send it to all of the OLPC kids.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    43. Re:Design issue alert! by *s.panzer* · · Score: 1

      Because Counter-Strike is the 'latest video game'.

      Zing!

    44. Re:Design issue alert! by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      And *I* meant that it's only what *we* would consider the latest games that it can't play.

      It would be able to play tetris -easy-, regardless of the design requirements. I don't think can still make pcs that would be too slow, the technology is so redundant it's lost.

    45. Re:Design issue alert! by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      hese computers are cheaper than a big stack of textbooks, though.>/blockquote>Between sharing books, buying them used and selling them at the end of the year, you could easily go through school spending less than 100-150$.
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    46. Re:Design issue alert! by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      Because Counter-Strike is the 'latest video game'.
      Well, it never gets old. I (and my friends) could have fun playing an old version of counterstrike. It doesn't take graphics or a story, just relatively good maps and a fast game pace (like quake)
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    47. Re:Design issue alert! by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      Counterstrike stuck around for long in Argentina due to the popularity of small shops which offer cheap internet access. Some of these places have low end machines (due to the high prices we pay for imported hardware) and Counterstrike runs very well in them... our internet connections are nothing to write about either, and the game doesn't have big bandwidth requirements.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
  2. Couch-device? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to admit that the more I read about the OLPC the more it seems like an ideal device for couch-centric web surfing and ebook reading... ;)

    But respect to the project for getting this far, I for one hope they make it all the way. Information wants to be free, after all.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Couch-device? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, for couch-centric web surfing, you need appropriate software. Hmm, that's a daunting engineering task indeed. I guess OOP has finally run out of steam here. The time has come to invent Loafer-Oriented Programming.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Forget the iPhone as the next Newton Replacement! by VE3OGG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw the pics (which are quite nice!) and the first this that jumped into my mind was the ages old (by hardware standards) but infinitely cool eMate 300 based on Apple's Newton platform. Those things were nigh indestructible and were marketed at he education market. All of those schools that are looking to invest thousands of dollars for computer equipment should really turn an eye to this unit -- cheap, infinitely flexible, and incorporating a lot of things that could be educational...

  4. Re:Optimized for p0rn distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be children using these devices, you prick.

  5. I wonder how far MS got installing XP on one? by GreatDrok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MS has had prototypes to try and install XP on, does anyone think they were successful? It looks like an amazing amount of thought has gone into the design and execution. MS must be scared to death of this thing.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:I wonder how far MS got installing XP on one? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      MS has had prototypes to try and install XP on, does anyone think they were successful?

      Probably, based on the colour scheme. =8o

      (Yes, I know it's aimed at kids and will no doubt be available in other colours; put me down for a red one to go with the devil-horns antennas.)

    2. Re:I wonder how far MS got installing XP on one? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      XP is so 2006. I want to see Vista running on these machines.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:I wonder how far MS got installing XP on one? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      XP is so 2006. I want to see Vista running on these machines.

      Really? Are all of your tastes so perverted? ;->

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  6. because by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    OLPC because every child has a right to have MySpace account!!

    1. Re:because by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OLPC: Overtly lustful pedophiles, celebrate!

  7. Goodbye, Commodore! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Linux Today has extensive reporting, including new photos and details about power consumption, networking, and the logistics of distributing and servicing what will be the largest rollout of any computing platform in history: 5 million units in the first year."

    Well, so much for the C64 world domination. It was fun while it lasted.

    ... Wait! With this production rate, it's more than three years to go, isn't it? Hmm, I guess I can snog my little lovely breadbox for some more time.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The C64 is part of why this project never really impressed me much. I can buy a C64 brand new for $15. No, I'm not talking about NOS, I am talking about a C64 manufactured within the last year. Yes, you would need to add a keyboard, Monitor, Wifi, larger case, and foot peddle, but when I went online, I found that I could put together a rugged, human powered computer for ~$90. This was right after the OLPC project was announced, and was single unit, retail pricing. No doubt that if parts were bought in 5 million unit lots wholesale, and bought today, that price could come down to ~$50.

      This just makes me ho-hum about this. It is just another business, and they have found a way to get other people to pay for all of the R&D in their new proprietary system.

    2. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > I can buy a C64 brand new for $15.

      And I can buy a calculator for $10, and it probably has a more advanced processor. I had a C64 for years and years, but unless you're doing embedded work, it's time to let the 8-bit era go.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    3. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      We are not talking about a target audience that will be doing database work, or working with large data sets. We are talking about very poor people. People who have not had access to computers before, and who find even getting access to books to be difficult. This is supposed to give them first and foremost, access to reading books electronically. Second, it is designed to introduce these people to computers in general. The C64 is more than capable of handling these tasks at a noticeably lower price. We are talking about charity here. If we can supply twice as many people with computers that meet the need than exceed the need, we would be making far more progress.

      I don't understand why so many people think that these second/third world countries need to skip the 'introduction to computers' phase of computers.

    4. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > The C64 is more than capable of handling these tasks at a noticeably lower price.

      Quite frankly, no it isn't. You might be able to piece together a low-end web browser, but it'd probably be even less capable than WebTV -- and good luck finding anyone who would want to maintain it. The idea is not to give people decades-old leavings of obsolete technologies so that they can navigate the corners of the web that will condescend to work for them, but to give a platform on which people can build tools (thus does it have squeak, which at the very least requires a 32bit CPU). There's probably some inbetween device even lower-spec'd than the OLPC could do, but I suspect it should then be the kind of device people can afford, not the sort of thing we toss out as charity.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    5. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      One of the major points of the whole OLPC exercise is to get people in developing countries hooked up to the Internet and I'm sorry, but a platform that can barely run Lynx just isn't going to cut it there.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    6. Re:Goodbye, Commodore! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why so many people think that these second/third world countries need to skip the 'introduction to computers' phase of computers.

      Then, to put it bluntly, you're an idiot. Nobody needs an "introduction to computers" phase, least of all kids! Maybe you think everyone needs to learn on a C64 because that's what you grew up with, but kids today are growing up with vastly more powerful and capable machines, and learning to use them just fine!

      Also, you (and a lot of other people around here) really have no idea what the OLPC is actually designed to be used for. Here's a hint: it's not just for reading books. Half the point is that kids will use it to interact with each other with chat and shared-whiteboard-style drawing programs, write programs (think LOGO or Squeak, not C++), compose music, etc.

      Oh, plus the OLPC is designed to function as a router in a mesh network. There's no way a C64 could even handle that task (routing multiple TCP-IP streams at once with decent throughput? yeah, right!), let alone do it while simultaneously processing interactive multimedia.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. When will consumers be able to buy these? by DrXym · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd pay $300 for a rugged laptop that runs 6 hours, can be stuffed into a small bag, has wifi, browser and other functionality. I'm sure a lot of other people would too - who knows perhaps it would be great way to subsidize the educational version.

    1. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by alnapp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Via Ebay ? ! ?
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6246989.stm

      As posted below, but more pertinaint as a reply to your post

    2. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Interesting. If that were the conditions, I'd say yes to it. I wouldn't want sugar UI - just Fedora & GNOME / xfce or similar, but other than that I can live with it the way it is, even down to the lime green finish.

    3. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      we can buy one only if we spend the money on one for the needy, as well? shite -- I was, and still am, willing to pay nearly 300 for one anyway, so i'd call it a done deal.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    4. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by kjcole · · Score: 1

      Although the situation has no doubt changed, when Dr. Negroponte spoke at the National Educational Computing Conference (NECC) in San Diego last summer, he said that his group didn't want to get into the business of selling in the U.S. The group didn't have the human resources to handle hundreds of purchase orders from independent school districts ordering 50-100 machines each. Rather, he said his group wanted to deal with entire governments, or similar large entities, that would be able to order gazillions of machines in a single shot. (At least, that's what I recall from his keynote.) Of course, the manufacturers of the hardware may have other ideas.

    5. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Although I agree these laptops could be useful (I currently use a $500 laptop for browsing, e-mail and chatting primarily), I do wonder whether the UI (both hardware and software) and storage limitations are sufficient for western adults.

      The software side can probably be changed (given it's linux based, I expect major improvements will happen if the OLPC becomes popular in the west). Perhaps a different color (black or white instead of green?) would make it more appealing. But storage would be a serious issue unless it allowed secure and fast access to home systems from anywhere.

      It could also make a very good terminal for X or similar protocols.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Although I agree these laptops could be useful (I currently use a $500 laptop for browsing, e-mail and chatting primarily), I do wonder whether the UI (both hardware and software) and storage limitations are sufficient for western adults.

      I think Sugar (the UI) would be hateful, but it is just Linux running underneath so I expect you could shove a cut down dist onto the thing and it work pretty much like a regular laptop. In terms of usefulness, I think that if it were bundled with Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice (or even Abiword / Gnumeric), Skype + a few games and multimedia things that it would satisfy what most people want to do when they're out and about.

      The software side can probably be changed (given it's linux based, I expect major improvements will happen if the OLPC becomes popular in the west). Perhaps a different color (black or white instead of green?) would make it more appealing. But storage would be a serious issue unless it allowed secure and fast access to home systems from anywhere.

      I wouldn't mind the colour at all but black would look nice. As for storage I believe the thing supports standard USB key devices so there should be no issue there.

      Personally I just think of the times that I go away on a holiday (to the beach, weekend or city break) and salivate over these things. At the moment I take a PocketPC loaded with Skype but it absolutely sucks for web browsing because the screen & input are so tiny. I could take one of these instead and use it on the plane over, or in the hotel room and the small size means its easy to carry with me without being scared of breaking it. It would knock the spots off a PocketPC in this role.

    7. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by konijn · · Score: 1

      $300 (or less) is the annual income of a billion people on this planet. Suppose your child comes home from school with a present with a market value of your annual income. A whole year of food...

      I'm pretty sure some of these laptops will end up in the western world soon.

    8. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Perhaps a different color (black or white instead of green?) would make it more appealing.

      Making it a different color would also serve another purpose: visually distinguishing between the official "sold-to-geeks-to-subsidize-the-kids" version and the "taken-away-from-the-kids-and-hocked-on-Ebay" version. I think it would do a lot to help keep these in the kids' hands where they're supposed to be, because the color would be a very noticeable bright green sign saying "I (effectively) stole this laptop from a poor kid in Africa!" and most people would be ashamed for people to see it.

      Personally, I think a good color for the consumer version would be red (even if this particular product is about helping education rather than fighting disease)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:When will consumers be able to buy these? by Riktov · · Score: 1

      because the color would be a very noticeable bright green sign saying "I (effectively) stole this laptop from a poor kid in Africa!" and most people would be ashamed for people to see it.

      Or perhaps, alternately, "I fed the family of a poor kid in Africa for a year!" ?

  9. And we can get them by alnapp · · Score: 3, Informative
  10. What about heat? by Yeti.SSM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wondering... What happens when somebody forgets the thing on direct sunlight (which is IMHO quite likely with kids)? Won't it damage the LCD or battery if left there for a while?

    --
    R Tape loading error, 0:1
    1. Re:What about heat? by slim · · Score: 1

      Just wondering... What happens when somebody forgets the thing on direct sunlight (which is IMHO quite likely with kids)? Won't it damage the LCD or battery if left there for a while? They've suggested that one reason they want to give the machines directly to kids, and not to schools, is that the kids will value them more that way, have a sense of ownership, and look after them better. By that logic, once they've learned that leaving one out in the sun kills it (if that's the case), they won't do it again.

      The question then is, how easy is it to get a replacement? Make it too easy, and you lose the incentive to look after the one you have. Make it too hard, and there'll be deserving children with no laptop.
    2. Re:What about heat? by gradedcheese · · Score: 5, Informative

      As I recall from the couple OLPC mailing lists that I read, they did (and continue to do?) a lot of LCD and overall 'destructive' testing. The LCD was sourced very carefully can contains a special UV filter, in fact last I heard there was a 'desert' and 'not desert' version of that to deal with the different environments. Similarly, they've done a lot of battery testing and there are improvements that will go into the revised and more final hardware.

      The OLPC does not contain any real moving parts (hard disk, etc) and the motherboard is behind the LCD panel, not under the keyboard (where the battery is). The processor runs nice and cool (in fact, it's underclocked).

      I worked at one for a while and it was a welcome relief from my 'burn your lap' ThinkPad with a PIII : ) That said, proper suspect and power management isn't done yet, so they have a lot more to do in these areas.

    3. Re:What about heat? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to wonder if anybody at the OLPC project (or even on Slashdot) has actually watched kids in real life? Even when a kid has a sense of ownership, that doesn't mean they won't leave the thing sitting on the floor of the living room for someone to step on, or next to a window that will get direct sun in 12 hours. Kids don't work like that.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:What about heat? by slim · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to wonder if anybody at the OLPC project (or even on Slashdot) has actually watched kids in real life? Even when a kid has a sense of ownership, that doesn't mean they won't leave the thing sitting on the floor of the living room for someone to step on, or next to a window that will get direct sun in 12 hours. Kids don't work like that. You generalise. Also we don't know what age kids we're talking about.

      When I was -- ooh -- 9 years old perhaps, my parents bought a BBC Micro for the family. It cost £400 -- a lot of money in those days, and a big investment by my parents. They sat me down and explained that it was an expensive and precious thing, and that I wasn't to boast about it at school because other kids would be envious. I was as good as gold, I used it every day, and I treated it with great care, and I most certainly did not crow about its bling.

      Kids can do that. If they want to.

      Of course, if all their friends have a Playstation, they're given one as if it's nothing special, they don't know it's value, they won't look after it. Easy come, easy go.

  11. Software by Cheesey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is one aspect of the OLPC that really worries me: the software. The machine will ship with many pieces of entirely new software, or at least new frontends for existing programs (e.g. Firefox). I think that this is a significant risk. There is a lot of code to be designed, written, and thoroughly tested before their first deployment on millions of machines. Those machines may not see a network connection after they are sold, so the software has to be right first time. It also has to be secure.

    However, the OLPC folks seem unworried:

    With two more betas to go before the summer, Bletsas was unfazed by the glitches. He also called the current state of the software "barely useable," but again was confident that it would be where it needed to be by launch.

    I hope that this confidence is not misplaced.

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
    1. Re:Software by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't have to take their word for it; you can grab the complete software stack and test it yourself, if you want. The OLPC team provide OS images that you can use to run the software in any x86 virtualization platform (they recommend qemu, but people have it running in VMWare and Parallels as well).

      It's worth checking out just to see their new "Sugar" UI -- which is pretty cool IMHO.

    2. Re:Software by vhogemann · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's where Python comes into.

      It's not like you can't shoot yourself in the foot with python, its just harder to do so. You don't have to worry about pointers, it has a HUGE and stable library, and integrated unit testing.

      Also, the GTK bindings are very mature. So if all you need is rewrite some UI code, Python probably is your safer bet.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    3. Re:Software by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Security is not really a great concern in the ones which will never get networked, and those that do can be updated.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those machines may not see a network connection after they are sold, so the software has to be right first time. It also has to be secure.


      Actually, not seeing a network connection should remove the need for security. There's got to be a Windows joke here somewhere...

    5. Re:Software by slim · · Score: 1

      Security is not really a great concern in the ones which will never get networked, and those that do can be updated. But the intention is that the vast majority will be networked. Almost all will join a mesh with nearby machines. Provision of Internet access to communities is part of the project.

      One nod to security is that each application runs in its own VM. (Why am I replicating TFA??)
    6. Re:Software by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

      Whoof, you must be kidding. One of the two single best development tools ever created by man (of course, some women were also involved of course -- thanks, Mrs. Goldberg! ;-)) will be sitting on the flash disk just next to that messy disorganized snake thing and you suggest ignoring it?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:Software by smagoun · · Score: 1
      There is one aspect of the OLPC that really worries me: the software.


      There are alternatives - Pepper Computer's Linux environment runs on the OLPC. It's more mature than the OLPC software, and was designed from the beginning for consumers. It focuses on web browsing and media rather than education, although it's possible to run things like eToys too. Pepper integrates Firefox, MPlayer, Helix, and a number of other open-source projects into something much simpler and easier to use than your standard GNOME/KDE clone of the Windows desktop. If you're at CES, stop by the booth for a hands-on demo of Pepper on the OLPC.

      (I work for Pepper)

    8. Re:Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very unclear and hard to understand comment. "messy disorganized snake thing" must be Python. I guess there is something you like better but I have absolutely no idea what it is, and I don't care enough to try to guess from your meagre clues.

      Clear writing is best.

    9. Re:Software by xa0s · · Score: 1

      I've been running it in Parallels for just over a week now. They post new builds daily, and its really simple to just bzcat | dd them to the Parallels harddisk image, and then boot.

      For fun, try running multiple vms to get show how the neighbourhood view and shared apps work.

      The 'activities' (apps) are still buggy, but I keep seeing improvements in each daily build; so much so that I've become addicted to trying out the new image every day.

    10. Re:Software by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Personally, I still don't understand why they didn't just use Squeak for the interface, since it was developed for the same purpose (and by the same guy, for that matter) and already exists and works well...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Software by slim · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking about Squeak.

      I'm a full grown adult, and I couldn't make head nor tail of Squeak, using online resources I could find.

  12. Playstation buttons by slim · · Score: 1

    The four buttons just below the screen and to the right are marked Triangle, Circle, Square, X.

    What's the story there? Did Sony suggest it? Were Sony asked for it? Is it product placement, or did the OX designers see merit in the culture-agnostic use of geometric shapes?

    1. Re:Playstation buttons by daranz · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's another one of Sony's uncoventional and widely ineffective marketing campaigns. This one targets third-world children as potential PS3 users.

      --
      This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
    2. Re:Playstation buttons by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I could see this helping for language agnostic buttons, but I think they were a complete failure on the Playstaion I,II,III. The problem for new gamers is to remember which button is where. Since you don't associate Triangle, circle, square and X with any position, it's hard to remember which button is where. Granted I find it weird that the NES put B on the left of A, but that's easy enough to remember. Maybe other people like it, and after a while playing on it, probably don't find it that bad. But my experiences, where I visit a friends house, and play NHL hockey or some other game, find it very frustrating. Which ones the shoot button. oh that's circle. and I have to keep on looking for where the circle button is. If you ask me, the GC has the best button layout. You can Identify all the buttons by feel, and the "Home" (Big green A) button always makes sure you know which button you are on. It also makes sense that since in 90% of games you are pushing 1 button 90% of the time, to make that button nice and big.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  13. Has Bletsas ever met an actual child? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OLPC should get to know their customers a little. This quote is a gem:

    "You have to look at this through the needs of a child [in the developing world]. A child doesn't want to play the latest video games. he wants to be able to read a book."

    Yes, those pure, innocent children of poor nations, unafflicted by the ills of our modern society, only want to study and advance themselves. Just look at the preferences of most children in the society with which you are familiar. And the children in poor communities -- they are even more focused on knowledge and self-improvement!

    It sounds like these MIT engineers are using themselves as a focus group -- if they were children in a poor country, knowing what they know now, that's exactly what they'd want!

    1. Re:Has Bletsas ever met an actual child? by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A child doesn't want to play the latest video games. he wants to be able to read a book."

      The children that this will help DO want to read a book. In order to reach the kids who will matter, one must offer opportunity to the group.
      Let's face it, most PEOPLE, anywhere, don't amount to sh1t. That is not a problem. Reaching the few who will learn and use that learning along with the personal ambition and ability to succeed matters.

      Geeks and technically able people are a minority in ALL countries, but we matter.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Has Bletsas ever met an actual child? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, "it's not a bug, it's a feature".

  14. Someone's smoking crack... by Daemonik · · Score: 1, Funny

    "You have to look at this through the needs of a child [in the developing world]. A child doesn't want to play the latest video games. he wants to be able to read a book." What reality does this dude live in that he believes a kid would choose "Pride and Prejudice" over Halo?
    1. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by electronspiraltoroid · · Score: 1

      Apparently according to someone on 4HV who has played with one of these, the stability of the software may be an issue as it crashed three times during testing. Its possible they had a bad unit though. I'd make the OS open source, so bugs like this can be fixed by Flash update (perhaps with a reset button to prevent brickage) -A

      --
      "Bother" said Pooh, as he was dipped in bees...
    2. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by BigTom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that, in a nutshell, is why the next generation of US and European kids are going to be serving coffee and noodles to the highly motivated, well educated immigrants who will be doing all the real work by then.

    3. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      And that, in a nutshell, is why the next generation of US and European kids are going to be serving coffee and noodles to the highly motivated, well educated immigrants who will be doing all the real work by then. Please, if 3rd worlders were that educated then 419 scams wouldn't be half as funny.

      Furthermore, I'd take the general knowledge base of an average American any day of the week over someone who grew up in a country where it's 'common knowledge' that sleeping with a virgin can cure AIDS.
    4. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      Furthermore, I'd take the general knowledge base of an average American any day of the week over someone who grew up in a country where it's 'common knowledge' that sleeping with a virgin can cure AIDS.
      A majority of Americans don't believe in Evolution.
    5. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, I'd take the general knowledge base of an average American any day of the week over someone who grew up in a country where it's 'common knowledge' that sleeping with a virgin can cure AIDS.

      You're just jealous because there are no virgins left in the US.

    6. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Not outside the programming community.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    7. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by gendusoa · · Score: 1

      Sign me up! This software stuff is hard to write.

    8. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by arifirefox · · Score: 1

      A majority of people who believe in evolution also believe in UFO's and the idea if you tax people more, the government makes more money and we are all better off.

      --
      Firefox Power http://firefoxpower.blogspot.com/
    9. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by slim · · Score: 1

      What reality does this dude live in that he believes a kid would choose "Pride and Prejudice" over Halo? "a kid"?

      I bet if you sampled a typical mixed classroom of British 14 year olds, at least 10% of them would choose Jane Austen over Bungie.
      After all, more than half of them will be girls, and while many girls do enjoy gaming, Halo's a particularly macho example.

      But, you know, you can have both. Monday: save Princess Peach. Tuesday: The Old Man and the Sea.
    10. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by slim · · Score: 1

      Please, if 3rd worlders were that educated then 419 scams wouldn't be half as funny. Yes, because all Nigerians are 419ers, Nigeria is just like every other developing country, and every developing country is just like Nigeria.

      Tsk.

    11. Re:Someone's smoking crack... by smithmc · · Score: 1

        And that, in a nutshell, is why the next generation of US and European kids are going to be serving coffee and noodles to the highly motivated, well educated immigrants who will be doing all the real work by then.

      Oh, nonsense. When I was a kid (born in 1969, in the US), I spent hours and hours in front of video games - Odyssey2, then VIC-20, then C-64. But I also spent hours and hours with my nose in various fiction and non-fiction books, and not just textbooks either. (Actually, I seldom bothered with textbooks.) And I may not have grown up to be Steve Wozniak or John Carmack or (shudder) George W. Bush, but I still manage to earn a pretty decent living - I'm certainly not serving anyone's damn coffee or noodles. Why should we worry about today's kids being any different? In any country, in any generation, there are the smart people, and then there's everyone else.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  15. Remember the other day... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 0

    ...when you asked me what irony was? Ironically they might have to resort to third-world cheap labor as the final solution to pumping the cost down to $100. Good thing little Paco* is learning how to use a laptop, since the only decent job in his country is putting them together! *Random spanish name chosen because Brazil was one of the first countries on the list

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Remember the other day... by perdelucena · · Score: 1

      Brazilian people speak Portuguese, and no our capital is not Buenos Aires

    2. Re:Remember the other day... by gradedcheese · · Score: 1

      They'll most likely be assembled in Taiwan and mainland China, you know, like where all your current electronics are assembled. I don't know how to put this eloquently, but the OLPC is an empowerment and education project so that those kids will grow up with skills and access to information (like you have), enabling them to have a nicer life later and improve their own country/economy. The $100 price is due to economies of scale, subsidies, etc.

      As for your ignorance of the language and people of Brazil... wow. But the other reply explained that to you.

    3. Re:Remember the other day... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

      ...I'm sick and I haven't slept in 25 hours due to work. Sorry about that. I was aware of the language of Brazil. But that issue that every reply continues to drive is trivial in this context (yes, knowledge is good. And yes, pointing out other people's ignorance is good. But there's no need to kick a man who made a simple mistake while he's down. I don't have enough time to do research on every word in every one of my posts. If you think all slashdotters should research the proper names for characters in cruel jokes, then by all means. Personally I don't know any *real* names that would work in the joke.). The point was a "made for children...by children" sweat-shop kind of thing. Odds are children don't make electronics, but are used primarily for textiles (I honestly don't know about this either) in sweatshops (if used at all). And yes, I understand the purpose of this charity. I've read articles about it...I was trying to make a point mixed with some humor.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    4. Re:Remember the other day... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1
      Random spanish name chosen because Brazil was one of the first countries on the list
      Too bad they speak Portuguese in Brazil.
      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Remember the other day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... Brazil = Portuguese... rest of Latin America = Spanish.

    6. Re:Remember the other day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *Random spanish name chosen because Brazil was one of the first countries on the list

      Jeez you must feel stupid then. After all, Brazilians speak portuguese, which isn't "spanish". Moreover, Paco isn't a Portuguese name either and it isn't at all a common name in Brazil. I guess you fail at smarts.

    7. Re:Remember the other day... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      *Random spanish name chosen because Brazil was one of the first countries on the list

      Unfortunatelly for you, we speak Portuguese here in Brazil, as many others have already pointed out. Anyway, just for not being "one more to bash you for you not knowing that", let me add some information. In Spanish-speaking countries, "Paco" is a nickname for "Francisco", which is a common name in Brazil too. But in Brazil the nickname for "Francisco" is "Chico", which coincidentally is one of the Spanish words for "boy". But "Paco" has no meaning for brazilian people, sounds "foreigner". Sorry!

      --
      So say we all
    8. Re:Remember the other day... by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Well, and Haiti = French...

  16. Re:Optimized for p0rn distribution by ray-auch · · Score: 1

    Well I, for one, can remember seeing porn passed round in school (paper-based, in the days before the internet). Plenty of interest in actual sex as well, and clearly some people were succeeding looking at the number of pregnancies...

    Looking at current statistics and surveys I see no reason to believe it is any different now. I think the figures are around 1% of UK 13-15yr old girls are acutally getting pregnant, so the % of that age group having sex must be much higher, and the % looking at porn is most likely higher still.

    I see no reason why the OLPC users should be any different from other schoolchildren - so, if they can use it to find porn, they almost certainly will.

  17. Won't someone think of the environment! by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Great 5 million laptops all needing more power. Say 100W per laptop, 500MW extra power is now needed to run them, allowing for 1/3 loss due to transport of said electricity and thats nigh on 700WM!?
    If they are being deployed in developing countries you can be the power comes from fossile fuels (being cheap and readily available, heck it's why the developed world uses them. Plus the UN/US wont let anyone else have nuclear technology as there is a potential bomb-risk).

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA - they run on average at 3W and will include a hand or foot cranked "Yoyo" for charging. Presumably in the countries they're going to solar power would be an option too.

    2. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Say 100W per laptop. . .

      Say 3w at cruising speed; 5w flat out. Less than a standard nightlight.

      2 1/2 hours of manual "labor" for a full charge, or 2 1/2 seconds of lifting the brick to the ceiling if you're a bit clever.

      KFG

    3. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by slim · · Score: 1

      Great 5 million laptops all needing more power. Say 100W per laptop, 500MW extra power is now needed to run them. Why speculate about the power requirements, when you can RTFA?

      Peak consumption is around 5 watts for high-demand media applications, it falls to around 3 watts for browsing, under a watt when used as an e-Reader in black and white mode, and only 350 milliwatts to participate in the mesh network. ... and in many parts of the world the power will be generated by the owner pulling on bit of string.

      I accept that manufacturing and distribution will have an environmental impact. Whether or not an empowered and informed next generation of world population offsets that, I can't begin to guess.
    4. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by nietsch · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you did not read the article did you? The XO consumes between 350 milliWatt when only it's only meshing, and 5 Watt when it's doing heavy multimedia applications. It can be powered by handpower/solar/ or a generator running off all the hot gas you produce when you open your mouth.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    5. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Even in a thunderstorm in Belgium a solar panel will still produce 5 watts without problems.

    6. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by rudlavibizon · · Score: 1

      Or they can tie a goat to the yo-yo!!!!!!!!!!

    7. Re:Won't someone think of the environment! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Or they can tie a goat to the yo-yo!!!!!!!!!!

      Well yeah, but what do they do after dinner?

      KFG

  18. Exactly! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1
    I could use thousands of machines like these and at the moment am stuck between using full laptops with all of the associate cost and bollocks or palm like devices which are useless for anything but reading the occasional appointment.

    These machines are substantially below the market value, in particular the built in mesh networking is interesting. What's going to happen is that they will be diverted in large numbers to places like ebay. What would you do if you were handed something worth a year's salary? To stop that they'll have to release the units generally to the public, hell it's even a good idea, the increased production would reduce the cost per unit significantly and will subsidise the educational version.

    "The first units will be closer to 100 Euros than 100 dollars," admits Bletsas. Of course the dollar has dropped in value by 40% over the period the OLPC has been in creation, so perhaps it isn't the best standard to compare the price against.
    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Exactly! by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      Yea... I could see lots of potential as field computers for engineering purposes. The ability to charge it via the crank itself is a good option in necessity. The size and form and apparently weight is great. You don't need top of the line laptops for the purposes I have in mind... but handhelds are just too darn small. This would be the perfect solution.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
  19. I guess even glancing at the article.... by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

    ...was too much to ask

    The final selection for power generation has yet to be made; it will be a yo-yo-like device that can be pulled by hand or foot, with a strap that can attached it to a belt or table. The yo-yo generates around 10 watts, while the XO consumes a mere 3 watts in non-intensive computing. This means, for example, that that for every 10 minutes of power generation, a child should be able to surf the internet for a half hour.

  20. Out of touch? by Hodr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You have to look at this through the needs of a child [in the developing world]. A child doesn't want to play the latest video games. he wants to be able to read a book."
    - Bletsas

    They may be in the third world, but believing that most children would rather read an e-book than play a video game seems a bit out of touch. And before the rabbid Lemony Snicket and Harry Potter fans chime in, a couple things to keep in mind are that not all children can read, and of those who can and want to read, books tend to occupy less of their time [anecdotal I know, but seems intuitive] than most other activities (including playing video games).

    1. Re:Out of touch? by stereoroid · · Score: 1

      Heck, as literary works go, there are many PD texts far superior to Harry Potter: just about anything by Mark Twain, for starters, and Dickens for the older kids. Heck, I even enjoyed "Anne of Green Gables" and sequels, and I'm not even a girl...

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    2. Re:Out of touch? by witte · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe not books.
      But this platform allows kids to explore multimedia representations of all kinds of neat stuff, e.g. wikipedia (and also allowing them to "add their distinctiveness to the collective" ;-)

      To paraphrase an old proverb, It may look like giving them fish, but it is in fact giving them the means to learn fishing by themselves.

      It will at least help to close the information rift between "modern civilization" cultures and tribal cultures that live out in the sticks. (Both ways !)

      I imagine at first the kids will be less involved, but imagine for example the impact this has for jungle schools. Once a few years have passed, the introduction of internet, free information, worldwide communication will be something a lot of kids will have gotten used to that otherwise would never have gotten much of a chance to expand their mind.

      It may also lessen the tactical edge some oppressive regimes have over some of the ethnic/political groups the try to eradicate.

  21. Is this really the best idea by haijak · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It would not surprise me if others have brought this up, but I have not seen it.

    Is the target market for this thing really those kids we see on the Christian Children's Fund adds? If they are, I think a better goal for the worlds resources would be something like "A pair of shoes for every chilled" I would imagine that starving people in the Sudan, or wherever they end up distributing these things, will pass them of in a heartbeat if it gets them a meal for a day.

    If the goal is to give computers to people who don't have them, a good place to start would be in developed and nearly developed countries. Right here in the US, 2000 census claims 42% of American households have a computer, and only 22% have internet access. That leaves millions of kids in American schools who don't have a computer. I think they, and those like them in other countries, should be the real targets of a project like this.

    --
    Don't judge me by my spelling
    1. Re:Is this really the best idea by slim · · Score: 1

      Is the target market for this thing really those kids we see on the Christian Children's Fund adds? If they are, I think a better goal for the worlds resources would be something like "A pair of shoes for every chilled" I would imagine that starving people in the Sudan, or wherever they end up distributing these things, will pass them of in a heartbeat if it gets them a meal for a day.

      We're probably not talking about refugee camps in famine-struck areas -- those really are people with more pressing needs.

      But there are villagers in the developing world who are not starving, but who are definitely "knowledge have nots". We're in the realms of "give a man a fish / give a man a fishing net" here.

    2. Re:Is this really the best idea by jimmyfergus · · Score: 1

      This reads like thinly veiled nationalism/racism.

      That leaves millions of kids in American schools who don't have a computer. I think they, and those like them in other countries, should be the real targets of a project like this.

      It is "those like them in other countries" that these computers are going to be sent to. Didn't you just contradict your own point? Or are the kids in Brazil etc. somehow not like American kids? Who exactly are the inappropriate targets of this plan, and how are they inappropriate?

      Nothing is stopping the government (or private ventures) in the wealthiest country in the world, backing OLPC to educate and supply its own poor (except greed, corruption, and an inane support for "Free Market" dogma). I'm sure if the US wanted to sign up to OLPC, the project would greet them with open arms.

    3. Re:Is this really the best idea by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``It would not surprise me if others have brought this up, but I have not seen it.

      Is the target market for this thing really those kids we see on the Christian Children's Fund adds? If they are, I think a better goal for the worlds resources would be something like "A pair of shoes for every chilled" I would imagine that starving people in the Sudan...''

      No, you're not the only one to think of this. People keep bringing this up, but I wonder why. It's not like everyone who doesn't live in the rich West and doesn't have two cars in the garage and a TV in every bedroom is automatically naked and starving.

      Why is it so hard for people to see that there are people who have their basic needs met, but lack access to information and means of expression? _Those_ people are the real target audience of OLPC. With the laptops, they can access information (potentially everything available on the Internet), and create their own content.

      If you consider what (censored) Internet access and blogs are doing for information, awareness and political speech in China, you can imagine what a project like OLPC could mean. Which is why I was surprised that Libya wants to participate in the project, by the way.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:Is this really the best idea by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Yes, people are ppor in many parts of the world, but I would imagine that they have the footwear issue figured out well enough to get where they need to go everyday. In an earlier conversation about OLPC, somebody asked a question similar to yours, except it was about pencil, paper, and textbooks for learning, not laptops. Basically, my argument is that these are fishing poles, and not fish. I'll quote my reply:

      "This is my opinion on the subject. Simply my humble predictions: this will be a *very* disruptive technology, changing the world in ways that we are not planning and we cannot for see. Children will use these laptops for their own purposes.

      As far as teaching plain ol' reading, writing, and 'rythmetic, a pencil and paper would do just as good a job for a lot less money. As a teaching device, they won't be a smashing success. However, what they will do is usher kids in third world poverty into the global communication revolution.

      Have you read about cell phones in rural Africa? These were places so poor that nobody, not business, not the corrupt government, not international aide programs, could justify the cost of wiring these places for phone service and electricity. However, once cell phone towers started going up, poor people started getting a hold of cell phones. Poor farmers were lining up buyers for fruit they were picking in the fields *as they were picking it*, instead of dragging it all the way to market and having it rot in the sun when there were no buyers. African societies have formalized rules of friendship and obligation, and having these fast communication tools allowed people to better utilize their social network and provide for the daily needs.

      These OLPC laptops will be used more like cell phones than desktop office computers. Yes, children are going to use these laptops to learn a little at school. But far and away, they will use them to talk to each other via the wireless capabilities. They will talk to people everyday that are more that a day's walk away. They will meet new people in neighboring villages electronically; people they have never met in real life.

      All people everywhere provide for their daily needs through their social networks. These rural third world kids will have a much expanded social network on account of these laptop. The tittering, giggling children passing gossip and songs back and forth on these laptops will one day grow up, start families, plant gardens, and conduct business, and uses these communication technologies to improve their lives.

      The paper and pencil model prepares kids for the office of the 1950s, where the only problem solving tools are pens and paper, in/out boxes on each person's desk, and vacuum tubes shuttling papers around. Kids of today will make their lives in a new world where we can organize flash mobs in a hour on a cell phone. They need to play with the tools to tomorrow, so they can creatively explore all the yet-unimagined possibilities they will use in the future."

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Is this really the best idea by eggegg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, the whole greed, corruption and "inane support for "Free Market" dogma" thing... must be referring to the incredibly successful and widespread school voucher program.

    6. Re:Is this really the best idea by haijak · · Score: 1

      I understand that there are various levels wealth in the middle. And in fact that was what I was talking about. From what I have read it sounded like the target was the bottom, I suggested in the second paragraph that the target for this be more in the middle.

      Your self and others have now confirmed for me, that is actually the plan. Thank you.

      --
      Don't judge me by my spelling
    7. Re:Is this really the best idea by jimmyfergus · · Score: 1

      Fair point with respect to what I actually said, though my intention wasn't to imply that nothing is done for the poor - simply that there's nothing stopping a project like this being adopted, so whining about it going to foreigners is baseless.

    8. Re:Is this really the best idea by haijak · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I was just concerned over what it seamed like I was reading. It didn't make sense to to me that they would be given to the absolute bottom, who are still working on the basic needs.

      Thanks for remeasuring me this is not a waisted project

      --
      Don't judge me by my spelling
    9. Re:Is this really the best idea by hjo3 · · Score: 1

      jimmyfergus wrote:
      It is "those like them in other countries" that these computers are going to be sent to. Didn't you just contradict your own point? Or are the kids in Brazil etc. somehow not like American kids? Who exactly are the inappropriate targets of this plan, and how are they inappropriate?
      ***

      He was just unaware of the OLPC's actual target group. I think it's obvious he wasn't trying to say the laptops should only be given to white American children. He certainly didn't deserve your accusations. Next time you might try making an effort to understand someone's message before you call them a racist.

  22. Re:Optimized for p0rn distribution by kfg · · Score: 1

    They will be children using these devices, you prick.

    Children who, for the most part, probably get to see a modicum of real life fucking going on.

    Most of the world does not operate by the prudish to the point of psychosis standards of Peoria. They live too close to the metal of reality.

    KFG

  23. Toss em in the dump? by Der+Reiseweltmeister · · Score: 1

    One thing that I notices when I read the article is that the distributors were suggesting that for most failures other than an LCD failure the thing would probably just be discarded.

    That suggests that in the not to distant future we could have millions of these things in the dumps of the third-world countries ill-equipped to process the waste. There is no mention of whether this has been considered, or if these devices may be RoHS compliant. I kind of doubt it, considering the (slightly at present) higher cost of RoHS compliant equipment and manufacturing.

  24. MESH .. Yes, please! by SlOrbA · · Score: 1

    I really really like the mesh networking.

    There is no way that Phone or Network hardware companies can make it happen. There is no question about the future being mesh, but the issue is when.

  25. alright, sorry... just sick of the anti-OLPC FUD by gradedcheese · · Score: 1

    I am sick too, similar situation. Sorry.

    I just really care about this project, it means a lot to me and I believe in it. I guess I get really defensive about all the FUD being spread about it. Here's an example of a website set up as a FUD/astroturfing thing whose purpose is to make people see the OLPC as a very bad thing:

    http://olpcnews.com/

    You see enough of this crap and then you start to get kind of upset (at least, I do). I don't know who hired that guy, for instance, but they really ought to be ashamed.

  26. soon by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    "The backers of the One Laptop Per Child project plan to release the machine on general sale next year." according to the BBC.
    and it will be twice the price (so $300 seems about right as they cost $150 to make at the moment)

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:soon by VE3MTM · · Score: 1

      Or how about this idea: in developed countries, sell them at a fairly significant profit, and put those profits into subsidizing the cost to the governments of these countries? If the cost is around $100 (it's higher now, but $100 is the target) to manufacture these laptops, they could even double the cost, turning the mass market sales into a kind of sponsorship, where buying one of these means also "buying" one for a child somewhere.

      I'm with other people here when they say that these sound like sweet little devices for web browsing and other low-powered computing.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 Whoops, silly middle mouse button...
    2. Re:soon by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I would be delighted to buy three, and keep one of them. I think this is a very cool project, and I look forward to giving them money.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  27. Books are NOT that expensive to print by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking as a publisher, there is no chance whatsoever that children's textbooks need to cost twenty bucks each to print.

    Go for it, you find me quotes from printers for runs of over five thousand books where they cost any more than, oh, five bucks apiece. And that is assuming conventional paper, hardcover (which is, btw, a terrible design approach compared to, say, tyvek over soft plastic), and the book being the awkward size and design of "normal" textbooks.

    But then what would I know? I've only done textbook production work for Harcourt-Brace, Houghton-Mifflin, and Scholastic, not to mention collateral materials and periodicals production for The Trumpet Club, Time, Inc., McGraw-Hill, and, oh, right, my own publishing company.

    No, the pricing of textbooks is a result of back-assed production systems, government contractor pricing, schoolbook adoption board warping of design, and terrible legacy choices related to all of the above. And with new digital printing systems coming on line all the time, real world limitations are dropping every year.

    Admittedly, I'm delighted at all of the above. I'm just now bringing my first bound products to press and I expect to underprice the buggers by fifty to eighty percent.

    But don't believe them when they tell you their mahooah about printing costs. You might as well take Halliburton's word for it on their costs.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    1. Re:Books are NOT that expensive to print by slim · · Score: 1

      Go for it, you find me quotes from printers for runs of over five thousand books where they cost any more than, oh, five bucks apiece. And that is assuming conventional paper, hardcover (which is, btw, a terrible design approach compared to, say, tyvek over soft plastic), and the book being the awkward size and design of "normal" textbooks.

      $5 is considerably more than "free", of course. And then there's distribution costs.

    2. Re:Books are NOT that expensive to print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you telling us that you can get textbooks into the hands of children all over the world for $5 a book? You can get the books into tiny towns in Africa this cheap, and you can get them replacements equally cheap when necessary?

      Sorry, I don't believe you.

      One XO laptop can replace every textbook a kid needs, and on top of that can access Wikipedia and other resources that would be hard to distribute as books.

      And Wikipedia can be sitting on a USB flash drive on a teacher's XO; it will still be available in places that can't manage a realtime connection to the Internet.

      But don't believe them when they tell you their mahooah

      On my initial reading of your words, I thought that "them" in the above sentence was the OLPC folks, and I was very annoyed at you. On second reading, perhaps you meant the folks who produce textbooks.

      The OLPC guys are right to say that textbooks cost around $20 because that's what they actually cost. If you can deliver textbooks for 80% less than that, then good on you, but the OLPC guys can't be faulted for viewing the textbook situation the way it currently is instead of the way you think it could be.

    3. Re:Books are NOT that expensive to print by bigpat · · Score: 1

      No, the pricing of textbooks is a result of back-assed production systems, government contractor pricing, schoolbook adoption board warping of design, and terrible legacy choices related to all of the above. And with new digital printing systems coming on line all the time, real world limitations are dropping every year. Thanks for the insight, so the price is really the result of market control over distribution channels and not physical costs associated with printing. That issue is not so trivial. Seems that electronic distribution solves this problem though.

      Admittedly, I'm delighted at all of the above. I'm just now bringing my first bound products to press and I expect to underprice the buggers by fifty to eighty percent. You can print your books, but can you distribute them? Seems places like amazon allow for greater choices in publishers, where they might not require distribution deals just to get your foot in the door. But there is a reason, they call the business "publishing" and not just "printing".

      Seems electronic publishing has the potential to be a lot more competitive to the benefit of more consumers, in this case kids trying to learn something useful and to the benefit of smaller publishers who are not frozen out of the market anymore.

    4. Re:Books are NOT that expensive to print by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      Oh, I certainly agree that five bucks is not anything like the same as "free", I just wanted to contest the misinformation out there about costs. And, btw, most of the cost of distribution if your product is good and not a copycat is plain old smiling and dialing. Makin' love to the electric donut. That and fullfillment which, for a small publisher, need be nowhere near as expensive as it usually is.

      For example, price out mailing tubes and then see what you get if you use two empty soup cans with rolled heavy paper between them instead. Stronger, cooler, far more ecologically responsible, and, including the cost of tape and mailing address, about a fifth the price of what you would pay ordering in bulk from Staples.

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  28. stealing food from starving children .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "I would imagine that starving people in the Sudan, or wherever they end up distributing these things, will pass them of in a heartbeat if it gets them a meal for a day"

    The people of Sudan and elsewhere are starving because of continual civil war brought on by the use of other technology sold them by the west, namely GUNS. Providing them with the OLPC and a meal are not necessarly mutually exclusive.

    http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/sudan1103/
    http://www.ecosonline.org/back/aboutus.html

    Is this really the best idea (Score:1)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:stealing food from starving children .. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "other technology sold them by the west, namely GUNS."

      Um, hate to rain on your ideological parade, but the AK-47 is not a western-made firearm. I imagine you'll see rather a lot of them in these troubled regions.

      Never mind that, though. Much more important to demonize the West than to actually try to, you know, educate people.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:stealing food from starving children .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

      Um, hate to rain on your ideological parade, but the AK-47 is not a western-made firearm. I imagine you'll see rather a lot of them in these troubled regions

      The reason it's 'troubled' is that it is full of diamands, gold and OIL. You don't have to be on an 'ideological parade' to oppose the international arms trade. Top Arms Exporters: United States, Russia, China

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry

      Never mind that, though. Much more important to demonize the West than to actually try to, you know, educate people

      Don't need to demonize the west. It's doing a good enough job of that already. And it is the west who is the top exporter of arms to the third world, the same place that the other poster accuses the OLPC of stealing food from.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    3. Re:stealing food from starving children .. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Top Arms Exporters: United States, Russia, China"

      Two of which are conspicuously not "the West".

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  29. Maybe I'm just a sap by Azathfeld · · Score: 1

    . . . reading this makes me cry a little. I think I love you, AMD.

  30. I have a copy by xxdesmus · · Score: 0

    I have a copy of the OS and I must admit it definitely is a bit confusing. The icons are not really all that intuitive. (I played with it inside of a VM)

  31. Think about it by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

    What would happen if you put them over here? For simplicity, let's say that every kid in every decent-sized city has one of these things. The mesh could potentially spread across the entire city. Which means a total blanket of Internet access. Do you have any idea exactly how, in a word, PISSED the telecoms would be about this?

    Wait, that gives me an idea!

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  32. brickwork! Mod parent up, please by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    2 1/2 seconds of lifting the brick to the ceiling if you're a bit clever.

    I had to noodle on that a moment before the image became clear. Good one! And I think right in line with the kind of creative interaction that OLPC hopes the kids will get into.

    1. Re:brickwork! Mod parent up, please by kfg · · Score: 1

      Turn a shaft and you have electricity. It really is as simple as that. Turning a shaft isn't exactly high tech by modern standards, but many of us live in a world where just raising a window requires a 3L internal combustion engine, so we forget how simple things really are. We are disconected from the tech we rely on. We know only its shadow, not its true form.

      Think about this; all the techonolgy to build a steam driven generator has been available since about the time of Christ. All that was missing was the raw knowledge that it could be done.

      Simple DC has been doable since the Copper Age. Some copper wire spinning between a couple Hunks-O-Magnetite.

      Knowledge is power.

      KFG

  33. I don't think the OLPC is a good idea by lbbros · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't like the idea of the OLPC because there is some fundamental problem that needs to be fixed before that. That is, a good deal of the so called third world countries that will need it aren't democracies. Now, what gain would it be if you give the chance to obtain information that has been already altered and censored? I'd say to worry about that problem first.

    --
    A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    1. Re:I don't think the OLPC is a good idea by slim · · Score: 1

      I don't like the idea of the OLPC because there is some fundamental problem that needs to be fixed before that. That is, a good deal of the so called third world countries that will need it aren't democracies. Now, what gain would it be if you give the chance to obtain information that has been already altered and censored? I'd say to worry about that problem first.

      I've been reading about the USSR recently. One of Lenin's beliefs was that the interim proletariat dictatorial state would wither into an state-free utopia once the right conditions were engineered, and that abuse of power would not be possible because the people would not allow it. Of course, notwithstanding Lenin's own exercising of state terror, Stalin blew that theory away. I'd say that one of the aspects that prevented "the people" from reining in Stalin was the state of communications. A Ukrainian peasant couldn't really know what was going on in (for example) Khazakhstan (in fact later on, an increase in travel associated with service in WWII opened people's eyes to what was going on in other parts of their Union, and fuelled resistance to Stalin).

      Distributing these computers is a step towards empowering these people with mass communication. As the OLPC people point out, people tend to find workarounds for state Internet filtering. Maybe increased education and communication is a tool to foster democracy, rather than something to introduce afterwards?

  34. the Newton by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Agggh, the pain! Yep, the wondrous, neglected Apple Newton, stranded to die an abandoned death by the Jobs regime for reasons they never did really justify.

    "It canniblizes our other sales"
    Really, now? The Marine corps wants to carry iMacs into battle?

    "It puts us in marketplaces we can't afford to focus on."
    Oh, you mean like education, already a core market, and vertical stuff like insurance that is vastly profitable?

    "There was never really any demand."
    Funny, that's not what, say, Infoworld said, let alone teachers, doctors, mobile salespeople, and, as mentioned above, the U.S. Marine Corps.

    "Shareholders are upset about all that investment in plant."
    So better to just write it all off and cut your profit numbers down further?

    "We can't afford the distraction from important projects."
    As CNet showed two months ago, the Newton is still better than most of what's out there. And from the scuttlebutt I heard from folks inside Apple, there were plenty of people wanting to buy the rights to the molds, the IP, the whole damn package. Apple (read Jobs and buddies) was just too snitty to accept any of the offers.

    I'm impressed by what I'm seeing about the iPhone, though a little more comparison to the Nokia 800 and various Psions would be appreciated. But this is pissant compared to what we would have now if we had gotten TEN FRICKIN' YEARS more improvement of the Newton.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  35. worried about the software .. by rs232 · · Score: 1
    "There is one aspect of the OLPC that really worries me: the software"

    I thought OLPC was based on Fedora Core sponsored by Red Hat Inc. so I wouldn't worry.

    "Those machines may not see a network connection after they are sold, so the software has to be right first time. It also has to be secure.

    If they won't be seeing a network then how would security be a problem.

    However, the OLPC folks seem unworried:

    With two more betas to go before the summer, Bletsas was unfazed by the glitches. He also called the current state of the software "barely useable," but again was confident that it would be where it needed to be by launch.
    Do you have any links or citations that quotes Bletsas as saying this?

    was: Software (Score:5, Interesting)
    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:worried about the software .. by Cheesey · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links or citations that quotes Bletsas as saying this?

      Yes, it's in the article. http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/200701090 2326NWHWEV

      My concerns about the software are really about the UI and applications. As I understand it, these are almost entirely new. I'm sure the OS will be fine since it is based on mature technology as you say. However, someone has pointed out that I can try out the whole thing right now using code from http://laptop.org/ - I'll do that before posting any more concerns which are only based on second hand information.

      --
      >north
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
  36. Wow, you're so smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they never thought of that. It probably never occurred to them these things might be used in sunny places. You should be on the design team.

  37. Re:Software - Sugar UI by oftencloudy · · Score: 1

    The Sugar UI looks very interesting. Jeff Atwood wrote about this just the other day. Its kind of refreshing to see a project like this break new ground in other areas besides hardware. Unfortunately there have been rumors that there has been zero usability testing so far. And yes, you can test it out for yourself, but maybe it would be even better to let your kid try it and email them the results.

    --
    But whatever the object, you must keep him praying to it. To the thing he has made, not to the person that has made him.
  38. Parallel processing capability? by Infinityis · · Score: 1

    Something I was wondering in general (but which might apply well for OLPC laptops due to the lower processing power) is if it would be feasible to implement a multicomputer parallel processing capability. That is, use the mesh network to divide processing between multiple laptops, based on a language like Erlang (if it requires substantial changes or simplification maybe give it a new name like IntErlang). I imagine it would use a BitTorrent approach to managing jobs and transferring data, and the connected laptops each run a safe process that handles computation & calculation (like is done with SETI@home).

    Doing all this would seem to create a virtual community-based supercomputer, but I don't know enough to identify if there are any showstoppers.

    1. Re:Parallel processing capability? by slim · · Score: 1

      Something I was wondering in general (but which might apply well for OLPC laptops due to the lower processing power) is if it would be feasible to implement a multicomputer parallel processing capability. That is, use the mesh network to divide processing between multiple laptops, based on a language like Erlang (if it requires substantial changes or simplification maybe give it a new name like IntErlang). I imagine it would use a BitTorrent approach to managing jobs and transferring data, and the connected laptops each run a safe process that handles computation & calculation (like is done with SETI@home).
       
      Doing all this would seem to create a virtual community-based supercomputer, but I don't know enough to identify if there are any showstoppers. Translation: "Imagine a Beouwulf cluster of these things"

  39. Extreme Annoyance? by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    According to TFA: "In general, the XO uses what Bletsas calls 'Extreme Suspend,' going to sleep after two seconds of inactivity, but waking up within 300 milliseconds of an action."

    When I'm reading something online, I don't scroll more frequently than two seconds. I would probably find something else to do if I had to keep jogging the touch pad to keep the display active. Maybe I'm misinterpreting this?

    1. Re:Extreme Annoyance? by slim · · Score: 1

      According to TFA: "In general, the XO uses what Bletsas calls 'Extreme Suspend,' going to sleep after two seconds of inactivity, but waking up within 300 milliseconds of an action."
       
      When I'm reading something online, I don't scroll more frequently than two seconds. I would probably find something else to do if I had to keep jogging the touch pad to keep the display active. Maybe I'm misinterpreting this? I understood this as being the CPU suspending, not the whole machine. The display subsystem would stay up. I could be wrong also, though.

    2. Re:Extreme Annoyance? by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 1

      Even with the main machine shut down the DCON chip can maintain the last image on the LCD since it has its own frame buffer and power domain. So you can read for as long as you want and only if you press a button will the computer wake up to change what is on the screen (to go to the next page, for example).

      In the same way, the wireless chip also is in a separate power domain and can keep working (routing packets on the mesh) even when the rest of the machine is off.

    3. Re:Extreme Annoyance? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The article said that the screen buffer is driven by a separate subsystem. My wild, unsubstantiated guess is that they've thought of the problem you describe, and have solved it, seeing as how anybody using the thing would literally notice said problem in two seconds.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Extreme Annoyance? by carpeweb · · Score: 1

      Thx to all four replies for my own mini Ask Slashdot. I didn't know what those technical descriptions meant. And thx for not assuming I was trolling; I was truly unenlightened.

  40. Re:Optimized for p0rn distribution by Pegasus · · Score: 1

    Ah, let them have sex, at least that's not harmful to the environment ...

    What worries me is countries like Nigeria and Rwanda being among the largest recipients of this toy ... as if not enough spam is coming out of those countries already ... and when kids learn how to get money from stupid people all over the world, what do you thing they will do?

  41. OLPC will retard democracy .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "a good deal of the so called third world countries that will need it aren't democracies"

    But then again neither is the US or its satellite in Europe, GB ltd. For decades protests were allowed across the road from the House of Commons, but not any more. It took the party of the workers to sneek in the leglisation, over the weekend and while parliament was on holiday. Eight arrested in Iraq protest

    was: I don't think the OLPC is a good idea

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:OLPC will retard democracy .. by lbbros · · Score: 1

      But then again neither is the US or its satellite in Europe, GB ltd.

      Apologies for the off topic post, but this irritates me. The fact that you are here, writing that, means they are democracies, or at least you have free speech. Go say that in China, or another real regime, and watch what happens.

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    2. Re:OLPC will retard democracy .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

      "The fact that you are here, writing that, means they are democracies, or at least you have free speech. Go say that in China, or another real regime, and watch what happens"

      We have free speech as long as we don't excercise it.

      Jailed for blogging ..
      http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/27/opinion/eds age.php

      Blogger arrested at Atlantica conference
      br> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/06/my-few-hours -in-jail-with-saint-john.html

      French Blogger Arrested Then Sued
      http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-4 5-20050513FrenchBloggerArrestedThenSued.html

      Canadian blogger arrested trying to enter the US.
      http://www.ensight.org/archives/2005/03/17/the-end -of-the-story/

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
  42. Before we project from our own experience ... by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    and before we worry about delivery method ... shouldn't someone verify that the target user can ... read? Literacy rates in the target countries are probably not what they are in the developed economies. Before worrying about distributing text books, OLPC hopefully will figure out how to overcome the possible problem that the user can't understand anything but the picture on the screen. And if the pictures on the screen resemble a "desktop", would that have any meaning to a typical user?

    1. Re:Before we project from our own experience ... by slim · · Score: 1

      and before we worry about delivery method ... shouldn't someone verify that the target user can ... read? Literacy rates in the target countries are probably not what they are in the developed economies. An abundance of (interesting) reading material is a pretty fundamental tool in developing literacy.

      Before worrying about distributing text books, OLPC hopefully will figure out how to overcome the possible problem that the user can't understand anything but the picture on the screen. And if the pictures on the screen resemble a "desktop", would that have any meaning to a typical user? TFA indicates that the UI is language-free.

      Do you really think the "desktop metaphor" bears any resemblance to the top of a desk? I think early Xerox and Apple UIs bore some resemblance to a desk, but I have great difficulty mapping any of the objects on my Windows screen to any of the objects on my desk any more.

      (When we were using MacOS 9 at university, my girlfriend commented that it was desktop because it had an apple in the corner)
    2. Re:Before we project from our own experience ... by carpeweb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An abundance of (interesting) reading material is a pretty fundamental tool in developing literacy.

      I agree; but I didn't learn to read just by sitting next to a pile of books. People read to me, etc. Note that I didn't claim putting books on the machine was a bad idea. I'm just questioning whether it's sufficient and also pointing out that the discussion of which specific literature might be best, regardless of whether it shows how erudite other posters might have been as wunderkinds.

      TFA indicates that the UI is language-free.

      TFA was also not written by anyone with experience teaching children in developing countries how to read. I'm not one of those, either. I'm just suggesting that consultation with those types of experts seems more important than, again, debating which specific sophisticated literature was most important to which specific child genius here in the developed world. Also, language-free doesn't mean culture-free. That doesn't mean it won't work, just that such basic considerations might be key determinants in the success of the concept. I'll bet you don't have any trouble mapping objects on your Windows screen to "objects" of your intellectual domain. I don't really know which of them is too tightly bound to developed-economy culture to be meaningful to an illiterate child in Libya, but it wouldn't surprise me if some meaningful fraction of them don't find the icons "intuitive".

      I posted this comment mostly because I saw the thread running into the realm of "well, when I was 2 months old, I read ...", which has little to do with the prospects for educating the developing economies, as a public policy proposition. I'm sure 20 years from now, some superstar rags-to-riches success story will in fact be profiled as having been inspired in his/her journey to the top of the Fortune Global 1000 by reading Ayn Rand on his hand-cranked PC. But the masses won't be educated simply by putting books on the machine (again, something that I think seems like a pretty good idea, but not a sufficient one in and of itself).

      Related response to the next criticism of my OP ...

  43. FURTHER OLPC BENEFIT! by allanc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just realized, if we make entire generations of young children in developing nations into computer geeks who can't get laid, we'll also solve the developing world's problems with:
    1. Overpopulation
    2. Teen pregnancy
    3. AIDS and other STDs

    Now I'm even more in favor of the OLPC project!

  44. More evidence about true cost by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "One way that costs are being kept down is to deliver the units en-masse to governments for delivery along the same channel as they currently use for textbooks, keeping the OLPC out of the distribution business. 'If we were selling this laptop through normal consumer channels, it would be more like a $250 laptop.'"

    My guess is that the implicit $150 "savings" in distribution cost -- which is a cost shift (to developing economies) and not a cost savings -- is based on distribution costs in developed economies. I would expect distribution costs to be higher in developing economies, simply because, by definition, they don't have the infrastructure comparable to developed economies. (Yes, that's why we call them "developed"!)

    Of course, if the purchasing governments simply distribute the units without regard to politics or greed, maybe they'll have lower costs, but it seems more likely that the costs that OLPC has shifted to the governments of developing economies will be shifted downstream, one way or another. "Yes, we have laptops for everyone, but you must come to Tripoli to pick them up."

  45. re: literary classics by arifirefox · · Score: 1

    those are the books we want kids to read anyway. I don't expect Literature classes to teach the works of Tom Clancy or Stephen King

    --
    Firefox Power http://firefoxpower.blogspot.com/
  46. Not in daily usage. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those library books don't get handled every day. I've been told by someone who worked in library preservation that regular hardcover bindings are good for (and I'm probably messing up these numbers) about twenty checkout-return cycles, whereas the more expensive library bindings they had done would be good for about a hundred before they needed to be rebound. (The library actually preferred to purchase paperbacks and have them rebound, because the hardcover bindings were expensive and comparatively fragile.)

    The point is that library books may not be in constant, daily use; you might be comparing apples to oranges here.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Not in daily usage. by suggsjc · · Score: 1
      you might be comparing apples to oranges here
      But thats what makes for a good conversation/debate...
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  47. OLPC contributes to waste .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "One thing that I notices when I read the article is that the distributors were suggesting that for most failures other than an LCD failure the thing would probably just be discarded"

    He didn't actually say discarded, what he said they would be repaired at government depots or replaced.

    "There is no mention of whether this has been considered, or if these devices may be RoHS compliant"

    You're kidding right? .. So projects like Computer Aid International should be banned. Incidentally the cost of these free computers usually works out at around £10,720 per 20ft container.

    was: Toss em in the dump? (Score:1)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:OLPC contributes to waste .. by Der+Reiseweltmeister · · Score: 1

      He didn't actually say discarded, what he said they would be repaired at government depots or replaced.

      And when these government replace a laptop, what are they going to do with the old unit? I am simply pointing out that there is a great possibility that they would be junked.

      You're kidding right? .. So projects like Computer Aid International should be banned. Incidentally the cost of these free computers usually works out at around £10,720 per 20ft container.

      Far from it, I think these projects are providing an invaluable service and I applaude them for that. However, I am wondering (aloud) if anyone has taken into consideration the long-term post-mortem impact of this additional 10% of the world's laptops being placed in countries with even less of an infrastructure for disposing of waste electronics than those that have traditionally had all the laptops.

      I mention this not because I think some action should be taken against OLPC, but because I think that if anyone wants to make a point out of acquiring the old defunct laptops they could provide a further service to these countries.

  48. No moving parts....but by Da_Weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In addition, Bletsas indicates that the units have been designed around low-failure operation, with no moving parts. For example, the motherboard sits directly behind the LCD, avoiding the need for a failure-prone connecting cable. So then how is the keyboard on the lower portion of the device communicating with the mother board? Is is using a low power radio transmitter or something? What about the touchpad? And power from the battery?
    --
    If you must!
    1. Re:No moving parts....but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Display requires high bandwidth communication and lots of connections. Keyboards on the other hand only require a few wires which would have a lot lower failure rates.

    2. Re:No moving parts....but by smithmc · · Score: 1

        So then how is the keyboard on the lower portion of the device communicating with the mother board? Is is using a low power radio transmitter or something? What about the touchpad? And power from the battery?

      Uh... the same way a regular notebook manages to display data even though the display is in one half and the motherboard is in the other. There are these things we call wires, running between the two halves...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  49. Distribution. Distribution. Distribution. by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Selling the laptop via an eBay store (especially when being sponsored by ebay corp.) actually makes sense. eBay already has the server-rack space, huge bandwidth, order processing capabilities and other online-retail amenities at the scale needed for something like this to work well. This makes it an easy step for the OLPC project to go retail without having to reinvent the wheel.

  50. the display doesn't go black by r00t · · Score: 1

    This is a reflective display, so it doesn't need a backlight. There is a special chip to keep it going when everything else is shut down. This requires very little power.

  51. Thank You by Cili · · Score: 1

    You just made my day!

    This is the best news I've had in quite some time. I'll definetly get one for me and one for my girlfriend... and two kids somewhere in the world will get theirs because of us. And all this in under 500 euro total. AWESOME!

  52. Re: literary classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    _The Shining_ is often considered a "literary classic". A lot of the "literature" you read got that way simply because it's old. Much of it is still pretty much crap.

  53. Proprietary closed source Wifi chip by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Have they solved this problem yet? The decision to go with Marvell (instead of some better supported chip, say, RealTek) seems to be arbitrary rather than informed.

    The choice of Marvell Wifi chip contradicts the very philosophical goal of OLPC itself. Disgusting.

    1. Re:Proprietary closed source Wifi chip by gradedcheese · · Score: 1

      Huh? The driver for it is completely open source. The firmware is a firmware image downloaded into the processor just like in any other WiFi 'card'.

    2. Re:Proprietary closed source Wifi chip by smithmc · · Score: 1

        The choice of Marvell Wifi chip contradicts the very philosophical goal of OLPC itself. Disgusting.

      And here I thought the philosophical goal of OLPC was... One Laptop Per Child. What does Marvell vs. Realtek have to do with that? That only raises the hackles of folks who think this is about some open-vs-closed "war", rather than the larger (and IMO more important) goal of helping disadvantaged children.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    3. Re:Proprietary closed source Wifi chip by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      > And here I thought the philosophical goal of OLPC was... One Laptop Per Child.

      It goes deeper than that. Take a look from their own press releases from OLPC.

      > What does Marvell vs. Realtek have to do with that? That only raises the hackles of folks who think this is about some open-vs-closed "war", rather
      > than the larger (and IMO more important) goal of helping disadvantaged children.

      I'm against the RMS "everything must be OSS" BS. However, in this case, the OLPC project just doesn't seem to be consistent with themselves, or has at one point spread misinformation. What I find disgusting is the deception, the hypocracy, not just being closed. If they told people in the first place that proprietary drivers will be involved, I'd be fine with it.

      Google for the controversy.

  54. Doom! by Kynmore · · Score: 1

    Granted, I love the OLPC idea, but the addiditon of millions of kids to the internet all at once can't be good... Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling. Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness. Earthquakes, volcanoes... Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave. Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria

  55. Same TROLL different day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    and before we worry about delivery method ... shouldn't someone verify that the target user can ... read?

    Before you post on Slashdot....shouldn't you verify that you.....read TFA?
    OLPC is an educational tool to be distributed through a local educational system. It will be used in conjuction with teachers in classroom activities.

    This argument is kind of like the other typical slashdotter OLPC canard: "shouldn't we feed them first, I mean how can they learn if they are starving???"

    The developing world is not all alike. There are levels and levels, with different needs. OLPC is aimed at some and not others. But most people have never been "there" (be it Vietnam or Kenya), and just have a cartoon vision of what it's like. That would be like, uhm, projecting from inexperience.
    1. Re:Same TROLL different day by carpeweb · · Score: 1

      Before you post on Slashdot....shouldn't you verify that you.....read TFA?

      Yes, everyone with a perspective different from yours is an uninformed troll. If only we would all have the same interpretation of the TFA as you, the world would be so much better. How arrogant can you get? I read TFA, but I was commenting about the extended discussion about a different aspect of both TFA and the /. thread. In fact, I think it's pretty clear that I was commenting more about the literature discussion than I was about TFA.

      OLPC is an educational tool to be distributed through a local educational system. It will be used in conjuction with teachers in classroom activities.

      So, by definition, the existing local educational systems are experts on teaching kids how to read? How well have they done so far? Oh, the only thing holding back the incredibly talented teachers and the equally gifted kids (not to mention the selfless bureaucratic heroes in these places) is access to technology? And it's a laptop design because it won't be taken out of the classroom? I see ... I guess I didn't read TFA, at least not the one in your head.

      Again, I have not indicated in my post(s) that I think OLPC is a bad idea. I'm questioning the logic of focussing on which specific content to install on it, rather than more fundamental questions like whether the machines will even be used in ways that OLPC anticipates. The coke bottle from The Gods Must Be Crazy comes to mind. And, before you rip me a new one for naivete about conditions in the undeveloped world, no, I don't assume that the entire developing world looks like that or even that the Kalahari (IIRC) looks like that. But I do assume that people from radically different cultures will interpret our ubiquitous objects (like PCs) quite differently from the way we interpret them. I assume that the way they interpret them will be heavily influenced by how they are introduced to them and how they are trained to use them. Lastly, from my experience with bureaucracy here in the bastion of capitalism, I assume that the way they are actually trained, on the ground, so to speak, will differ from the vision of how they "ought" to be trained, as designed "in the lab", so to speak. Imagine the children's game of Telephone, but the "caller" is Nicholas Negroponte and the receiver is a 5-year old in some remote jungle. In between are various operatives from OLPC, bureaucrats along the distribution chain (about which I've commented elsewhere), bureaucrats along the educational management chain, and of course, the local teachers. Why would we assume that the vision so eloquently expressed by Negroponte would reach its destination ungarbled?

      I still think this is an exciting and promising venture, but I remain skeptical about utopian implementation predictions.

      This argument is kind of like the other typical slashdotter OLPC canard

      Nowhere in my post(s) have I indicated that I don't think this cannot work. Again, I was mainly commenting that other factors are more important than which piece of great literature inspired little Johnny (or Janey) Middleclass on his incredibly significant intellectual journey here in DevelopedWorld.

      The developing world is not all alike. There are levels and levels, with different needs. OLPC is aimed at some and not others. But most people have never been "there" (be it Vietnam or Kenya), and just have a cartoon vision of what it's like. That would be like, uhm, projecting from inexperience.

      Really? I never would have guessed that. Thanks for enlightening me. No, I've never been to those places, but your implication that you have greater insight than I do is a bit arrogant. Because I, too, read, I'm aware that lots of experts have, in fact been to those places, etc. I'm pretty sure I was also aware that "those places" encompass a range of environments. Nowhere in my post(s) have I indicated that I thought they were homogeneous. In fact, nowhere in my post(s) have I indicated anything whatsoever about their similarities or differences, period.

  56. Re: literary classics by slim · · Score: 1

    _The Shining_ is often considered a "literary classic". A lot of the "literature" you read got that way simply because it's old. Much of it is still pretty much crap.
      Whereas The Shining is both new(ish) and crap (seriously -- cite me a respectable source that really claims it's a literary classic)

  57. It's not MS and it's not Intel AMD. Look out by g8orade · · Score: 1

    This is really poised to be a disrupter.

  58. And DOH it IS AMD by g8orade · · Score: 1

    RTFM.

  59. Publishers are NOT that expensive to hire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all nice. Now when are you going to address the other side of the equation? The costs to create a book? Not the printing costs. Not the distribution costs.* The costs from author all the way to final typesetting. Or the costs of all the failures?

    *If that really was the issue, then outsourcing would have taken root in the book industry. Chinese labour and production with a distribution system to match.

    1. Re:Publishers are NOT that expensive to hire. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      Hey, Mr. AC person, take a look at commodity books like dictionaries. "Chinese labour and production with a distribution system to match" became the norm over ten years ago now.

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  60. Open Source Education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a World Education Council codevelop an Open Source Education?

    Based off of free resources such as Project Gutenberg
    and Wikipedia.

    A great deal of basic education is 1. Old 2. Redundant
    Math, Science, Language, all 'Open Source' to begin with if you think about it.

    Only when you get into culture, social studies, politics, religion, do differences among cultures begin to diverge.

    How about it ?
    A Global Education, not sourced on any one country/politics/belief system,
    teaching the needed skills of math, logic, science, reading, speaking.

  61. Cue the lawsuits... by Lord+of+Hyphens · · Score: 1

    ...from the {MP,RI}AA against children who got OLPC laptops and got creative.

    ...from the {MP,RI}AA against the OLPC people, claiming that the machines are a breeding ground of copyright violations as they don't have DRM pre-equipped.

    We all know that they just love negative publicity.






    Yes yes, I know about (or can readily surmise) the various hurdles and impracticalities of suing a child on the other side of the planet. If you took that seriously, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

    --
    "I've spent my whole life figuring out crazy ways to do things. It'll work." -- Montgomery Scott, "Relics"
  62. Re:Design issue alert! (Not Troll Post) by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

    This post is NOT a troll.

    So many rich, spoilt yanks (I am a rich, spoilt Brit) are posting to this discussion as if they have something to contribute based on their western decadent upbringing. The fact is that they are not even planning for a single one of these machines to end up in the US of A. They are intended to go to THE THIRD WORLD.

    The third world consists of a great many places where buying even 1 text book for each child would break the bank for the government.

    If you are going to contribute something to this discussion please try and put yourself in the position of a child in africa, who has no toys other that what they can make themselves, probably very few books and can only go to school once per week as that is all the country can afford teachers for.

    As for talking about eye strain, please follow the link below and read up about the infant mortality rate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_mortality

    In short, the kids have far worse things to worry about than eye strain, like dying of Aids because some western drug company wants a bit more profit and put the price beyond what poor countries can afford because it makes more profit in the west.
    And when a country refuses to follow western drug patent laws like India, did the US of A government lobbies the WTO until the country gets financially punished for trying to save some lives. (more links below)

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0 7EED7163FF937A15750C0A9639C8B63&sec=health
    http://www.news-medical.net/?id=8684

    The idea of the OLPC program is that by providing children in the third world with a decent education we can try and level the playing field in the future and enable these countries to better compete with us economically in the west. This has to done soon or the gap between rich countries and poor will become so huge that the idea of joining some looney religious sect that promotes suicide bombing will become very appealing.

    If you knew that there was a high chance of dieing of starvation you might just commit suicide too, especially if you have had to watch someone starve to death as this is supposedly one of the worst ways to go. As it is a great many people from the third world are willing to risk some pretty hairy sea voyages on home made rafts just to end up in our countries and work for less than we would consider. Fast forward 10 years and who knows how bad things will get.

    Once again, this post is not a troll, so please don't moderate it as such just because you dont like hearing anything bad said about the US or its residents.

    --
    I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  63. Warranty/Support/Repairs? by Dretep · · Score: 1

    While a noble effort by the OLPC, have they really thought this true? Who is going to provide support for 5 million notebooks? Will there be authorized local service centres where kids can take them after they've been dropped? How long are these things supposed to last?

  64. Free textbooks for a cool mil? by phaggood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >There's absolutely no reason in the world why we shouldn't have a complete set of open content textbooks covering all of a basic liberal education
    Agreed, tho the $100M you mention seems more than should be needed; Wikipedia just raised nearly $1M all from small donations. I can't believe that textbooks for the basic 4 subjects, math, reading, science, history, for 1-8th grade, couldn't be written by a small group of writers in a year for $1M. I bet if you offered a bounty, like 'RentACoder' on two smaller projects, one that created the 'table of contents' for the books, then another to actually write all the chapters, you'd end up with free-to-use e-books that could be used by any district that wished.

    Maybe some of these 'free textbook' sites are a good place to start:

    http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page
    http://www.businessbookmall.com/Free%20Business%20 Books.htm
    http://digg.com/tech_news/Hundreds_of_Free_Textboo ks_on_one_website
    http://www.textbookrevolution.org/

    1. Re:Free textbooks for a cool mil? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Agreed, tho the $100M you mention seems more than should be needed; Wikipedia just raised nearly $1M all from small donations. I can't believe that textbooks for the basic 4 subjects, math, reading, science, history, for 1-8th grade, couldn't be written by a small group of writers in a year for $1M.

      Oh, absolutely. I was just being ridiculously conservative. US public schools spend more than $100M per year on books, and I would think that a complete set of texts for K-12 would cost much less than $50M, even without any volunteer help -- and I think there'd be plenty of that, as well.

      It's just so obvious that it's a better, cheaper approach... I don't understand why it doesn't happen. Though I'll bet lobbyists from the textbook publishing industry have more than a little to do with it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.