But, why on earth would anyone want to run a PCI video card? And if you managed to find a reason (I'm too broke to spend $100 on a new motherboard, memory and CPU which is why I'm running linux) then obviously you do not care about performance so why not just pick up a $5 flea market generic? Don't tell me you are doing anything in graphics mode on your non-AGP motherboard system? Oh yea... pron...
I get SO tired of hearing this same crap over and over: "M$ will win because... M$ money can buy the best lawyers." and the closely related but not yet spotted (give it time): "M$ bought the judge!"
Look idiots - IF that were so, then why did MS lose the recent federal trial? Hmmm? IF they bought off the judge and have the best lawyers why is their entire existance dependent on surviving an appeal? Why didn't those best lawyers with the paid off judge just find MS innocent and have it end there?
Been seeing any black helicopters lately?
Re:In other news: MS Switches Internal Servers to
on
Microsoft Cracked
·
· Score: 1
Search Deja for "~a doug@fsck-athome.lordlegacy.org" & "~g comp.dcom.modems.cable"
Sample:
The following procedure outlines the proper steps to be taken when dealing with customers that have been suspended for AUP violations and customers wanting to report an AUP violation.
If you are talking to someone who has been suspended, warned or terminated for an AbuseViolation:
1. Verify that they are a customer who has had action taken against them, and not someone reporting abuse.
2. Transfer them to the Policy Management phone line. This phone is answered 7 AM to 7 PM, Monday through Friday PST. The direct line is (650) 569-5399. You may distribute this phone number freely. If no one is available to answer the phone, Policy Management will call them back if they leave voice mail.
3. Do NOT discuss the issue with them, the Policy Management Team will do this when they speak to the customer.
If you are talking to someone who wants to report a Violation of @Home's Acceptable Use Policy:
1. Direct them to send email to abuse@home.com. Please include any relevant documentation: log file excerpts, email message or Usenet posting with complete headers, URL, etc. This is the preferred method of reporting an abuse violation and will cause a ticket to be automatically generated. The Policy Management team will follow up on the report. Do NOT open a ticket and assign it to Abuse.
2. If they insist on speaking to someone, transfer them to the Policy Management phone line. This phone is answered 7 AM to 7 PM, Monday through Friday PST. The direct line is (650) 569-5399. You may distribute this phone number freely. If no one is available to answer the phone, Policy Management will call them back if they leave voice mail.
If you are talking to someone who has a question about @Home's Abuse Policy:
1. Direct them to http://www.home.net/aup where the AUP is posted.
2. If they have a question about the policy as written, they can send email to abuse-policy@corp.home.net.
You wrote: "but when an NTFS partition corrupts so badly that..." - well, gee, if we're just making up scenarios that's pretty unfair! I mean, why can't I say: "but when Linux screws up so badly that the pc not only won't boot but has actually suffered physical damage..." - you didn't address likelyhood...
Complete lie. Unlike you *I* have been to hotmail.com and seen with my own eyes the farm. Get over it - W2K is running the show (except a single solaris box) now.
That's Netcraft quoting some troll... Try running netcraft against Hotmail yourself. Go ahead. Try it 1000 times... do you see anything but IIS/W2K? I know I sure don't. This is old news. hotmail runs W2K for IIS.
I must tell you that NT4 is horrible for laptop users - you simply must upgrade to w2k for your laptop. you will be simply amazed at how much improved your battery life and overall performance will be.
I'm curious - what types of scientific apps and instant stants generation for RH (nothing comparable under win32?)
Quake runs on any windows machine (so long as the video card has opengl support), server or otherwise.
...who cares. The only serious laptop OS is windows 2000 (don't comment unless you've tried it to see what I mean). Given the volume of windows on laptop's and the (at least initial) target of this chip is low power consumption laptops - who cares how it runs server OSes...
Linus? Input? He's sucking down the bucks from the only place that'll pay him. I question how much he did to earn it.
Don't you get it you pathetic zealous moron fucking idiot? There never was and never will be 65,000 bugs in W2K? the initial story was wrong, that number is wrong, the stories number was wrong and everything about it was bullshit. But what isn't bullshit is that the RedHat 7 distribution has 2500+ confirmed bugs in it -- doesn't matter if it's in the base or not - it's what you get when you get the whole package. Does anyone count IE bugs seperate from W2K Bugs? IIS bugs seperate from W2k? No - so why give RH any such luxury - oh forgot, yer a zealot, Linux is perfect. What is it with "all those people?" Well, they're right. Slashdot *IS* always forgiving of Linux and harsh on MS. Always. Period.
They fixed the bug 2 days after it was announced - check http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1488 AND this was NOT the method used to break in - did you actually read the article or just stop as soon as a random "security expert" attacked IIS?
#1) The hacker, by his own admission, did NOT use the IIS 4.0/5.0 Source Fragment Disclosure Vulnerability. HE says he didn't. Who knows WHY CNN choose to quote some misc. "security expert" who GUESSED at what was done when they KNOW (they wrote the quote one paragraph later) that this was untrue! How irresponsible and misleading this is!
#2) The Microsoft IIS 4.0/5.0 Source Fragment Disclosure Vulnerability has already been fixed for both IIS4 and IIS5!!! HELLO PEOPLE! Visit http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1488 and see for yourself - fixed 2 days after it was discovered!
#3) What hack this guy used we do not know but it does not automatically mean that all IIS servers are vulnerable. Does one crack on one Apache server mean all Apache servers are vulnerable? Until we know how exactly he did what we don't know where the weak link was. Maybe someone forgot to change the blank password for SA - who knows:)
ALL I'm saying is - Wait for details and stop spreading FUD.
No, it's not. The 5th Amendment would kick in when someone asks him: "Are you bootlegging copyrighted music?" - he could plead the 5th. (Cause if he said "No" and was found guilty, they would add perjury easily). That's where the 5th comes in. Another example: "We have a search warrant for your house, give us a key." No. "OK, we're going in anyway (crash) AND you are charged with obstruction of justice. Feel victorious now?" waaaaaaa!
Don't like a law, try to have it overturned. But, fighting by disobeying the police and judges is a very hard way to fight. Not impossible but you had BETTER *KNOW* you are right! Civil disobedience has failed far far far far far far far more often than it's succeeded in history. Are you THAT sure that stealing music is legal?
The student didn't get his PC confiscated for distributing MP3. He was busted for distributing copyrighted music he didn't have the right to distribute (doesn't matter if he owned the original CD or not).
When some warez kiddies are busted for posting copies of Office 2000 - why doesn't the community rise up to protect him declaring: "Computer User Arrested For Distributing RAR files!" They are coming after the RAR format! They want to stiffle our ability to compress! Those bastards! They are trying to slow us down by making us send larger files! It's a plot by the ZIP format MiBs! They want to make us use large single ZIPs instead of chasing down and making repost requests for Photoshop55DoD.r32 or the SFV file.
Oh the hypocracy! I like playing a game. Every time I read about "Save Napster" or how it should be legal to steal music and distribute it - I just replace the appropriate words/terms with those for warez. Gee - don't ever see that on/. or EFF...
Ignoring your mainly pathetic, ignorant, uneducated and obviously whiny central point - let me also dash your desire for Scram disk.
So you've got this encrypted volume with ultra super duper mega uncrackable security. Even the NSA can't break it - the only way in is by knowing your way obtuse and totally freaky weird password.
Guess what - it'll be effortless for police to get in. Why? Because they'll ask you for the password. Simple as that. "Joe, what is the password?" they'll say and expect you to answer correctly. You don't/won't? The judge will order you to or be found in contempt of court. Don't/won't? You'll go to jail - later be asked again. Still won't? You'll be found guilty of obstruction of justice and put in jail. Upon release you'll be asked again - won't do it? Repeat the above. AND you don't even have to be guilty of the original charge. No one cares at that point.
Oh - decide you want to install some "insto-delete-it-and-overwrite-it" software? Cops come in and you hit Ctl-Alt-Shift-Z and even the NSA can't read the drive. Into jail you go for destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice AND they'll prosecute you anyway and they will claim they say this or that on your system and have screen shots and print outs andyou'll have NOTHING to counter with other than "No, you're lying but I erased my proof cause I wanted to but I'm innocent."
I don' know who is more pathetically stupid, you or the person who moderated this crap upwards? Track you via your watermark to your credit card purchase of the CD? hahahahaha - and how, mr. brainiac, are they going to do that? And what if you paid by cash? Wow, there goes your entire theory...
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.nvnews.net/previews/leadtek_geforce2_mx /dh_pro.shtml
But, why on earth would anyone want to run a PCI video card? And if you managed to find a reason (I'm too broke to spend $100 on a new motherboard, memory and CPU which is why I'm running linux) then obviously you do not care about performance so why not just pick up a $5 flea market generic? Don't tell me you are doing anything in graphics mode on your non-AGP motherboard system? Oh yea... pron...
I get SO tired of hearing this same crap over and over: "M$ will win because... M$ money can buy the best lawyers." and the closely related but not yet spotted (give it time): "M$ bought the judge!"
Look idiots - IF that were so, then why did MS lose the recent federal trial? Hmmm? IF they bought off the judge and have the best lawyers why is their entire existance dependent on surviving an appeal? Why didn't those best lawyers with the paid off judge just find MS innocent and have it end there?
Been seeing any black helicopters lately?
MS Does, it's pure W2K
Search Deja for "~a doug@fsck-athome.lordlegacy.org" & "~g comp.dcom.modems.cable"
Sample:
The following procedure outlines the proper steps to be taken when dealing with customers that have been suspended for AUP violations and customers wanting to report an AUP violation.
If you are talking to someone who has been suspended, warned or terminated for an AbuseViolation:
1. Verify that they are a customer who has had action taken against them, and not someone reporting abuse.
2. Transfer them to the Policy Management phone line. This phone is answered 7 AM to 7 PM, Monday through Friday PST. The direct line is (650) 569-5399. You may distribute this phone number freely. If no one is available to answer the phone, Policy Management will call them back if they leave voice mail.
3. Do NOT discuss the issue with them, the Policy Management Team will do this when they speak to the customer.
If you are talking to someone who wants to report a Violation of @Home's Acceptable Use Policy:
1. Direct them to send email to abuse@home.com. Please include any relevant documentation: log file excerpts, email message or Usenet posting with complete headers, URL, etc. This is the preferred method of reporting an abuse violation and will cause a ticket to be automatically generated. The Policy Management team will follow up on the report. Do NOT open a ticket and assign it to Abuse.
2. If they insist on speaking to someone, transfer them to the Policy Management phone line. This phone is answered 7 AM to 7 PM, Monday through Friday PST. The direct line is (650) 569-5399. You may distribute this phone number freely. If no one is available to answer the phone, Policy Management will call them back if they leave voice mail.
If you are talking to someone who has a question about @Home's Abuse Policy:
1. Direct them to http://www.home.net/aup where the AUP is posted.
2. If they have a question about the policy as written, they can send email to abuse-policy@corp.home.net.
You wrote: "but when an NTFS partition corrupts so badly that..." - well, gee, if we're just making up scenarios that's pretty unfair! I mean, why can't I say: "but when Linux screws up so badly that the pc not only won't boot but has actually suffered physical damage..." - you didn't address likelyhood ...
NTFS 5 is a commercial quality journaling file system.
What a pack of idiots. I don't see how those linux guys can operate screw-top caps.
Complete lie. Unlike you *I* have been to hotmail.com and seen with my own eyes the farm. Get over it - W2K is running the show (except a single solaris box) now.
That's Netcraft quoting some troll... Try running netcraft against Hotmail yourself. Go ahead. Try it 1000 times... do you see anything but IIS/W2K? I know I sure don't. This is old news. hotmail runs W2K for IIS.
It was 49.7 days and WAS fixed as soon as it was detected. Sigh... more FUD...
I must tell you that NT4 is horrible for laptop users - you simply must upgrade to w2k for your laptop. you will be simply amazed at how much improved your battery life and overall performance will be.
I'm curious - what types of scientific apps and instant stants generation for RH (nothing comparable under win32?)
Quake runs on any windows machine (so long as the video card has opengl support), server or otherwise.
This puppy has a unique serial number exposed that can be used to track you...
Where is the same outrage we heard when Intel (profitable company) did what Transmuta (won't make a dime company) is doing?
Ahhh yes, I forgot, Linus is involved...
...who cares. The only serious laptop OS is windows 2000 (don't comment unless you've tried it to see what I mean). Given the volume of windows on laptop's and the (at least initial) target of this chip is low power consumption laptops - who cares how it runs server OSes...
Linus? Input? He's sucking down the bucks from the only place that'll pay him. I question how much he did to earn it.
Don't you get it you pathetic zealous moron fucking idiot? There never was and never will be 65,000 bugs in W2K? the initial story was wrong, that number is wrong, the stories number was wrong and everything about it was bullshit. But what isn't bullshit is that the RedHat 7 distribution has 2500+ confirmed bugs in it -- doesn't matter if it's in the base or not - it's what you get when you get the whole package. Does anyone count IE bugs seperate from W2K Bugs? IIS bugs seperate from W2k? No - so why give RH any such luxury - oh forgot, yer a zealot, Linux is perfect. What is it with "all those people?" Well, they're right. Slashdot *IS* always forgiving of Linux and harsh on MS. Always. Period.
The July 17th exploit everyone is going on about was fixed July 19th. Read: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1488
So, how are all those compromised zombie servers in unix land doing these days? Compromised for ages and more continued to e compromised daily.
Open Source didn't help prevent RedHat from releasing a distrib with 2500+ bugs in it eh?
ALSO - the July 17th exploit was FIXED July 19th!!
They fixed the bug 2 days after it was announced - check http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1488 AND this was NOT the method used to break in - did you actually read the article or just stop as soon as a random "security expert" attacked IIS?
#1) The hacker, by his own admission, did NOT use the IIS 4.0/5.0 Source Fragment Disclosure Vulnerability. HE says he didn't. Who knows WHY CNN choose to quote some misc. "security expert" who GUESSED at what was done when they KNOW (they wrote the quote one paragraph later) that this was untrue! How irresponsible and misleading this is!
:)
#2) The Microsoft IIS 4.0/5.0 Source Fragment Disclosure Vulnerability has already been fixed for both IIS4 and IIS5!!! HELLO PEOPLE! Visit http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1488 and see for yourself - fixed 2 days after it was discovered!
#3) What hack this guy used we do not know but it does not automatically mean that all IIS servers are vulnerable. Does one crack on one Apache server mean all Apache servers are vulnerable? Until we know how exactly he did what we don't know where the weak link was. Maybe someone forgot to change the blank password for SA - who knows
ALL I'm saying is - Wait for details and stop spreading FUD.
Funny how no one said that during the "65,000 bugs in W2K" bullshit spammed around here February. This is not suprising either.
So, unable to refute anything I wrote? Just lame attempts at some kinda insult I assume? Weird...
No, it's not. The 5th Amendment would kick in when someone asks him: "Are you bootlegging copyrighted music?" - he could plead the 5th. (Cause if he said "No" and was found guilty, they would add perjury easily). That's where the 5th comes in. Another example: "We have a search warrant for your house, give us a key." No. "OK, we're going in anyway (crash) AND you are charged with obstruction of justice. Feel victorious now?" waaaaaaa!
Don't like a law, try to have it overturned. But, fighting by disobeying the police and judges is a very hard way to fight. Not impossible but you had BETTER *KNOW* you are right! Civil disobedience has failed far far far far far far far more often than it's succeeded in history. Are you THAT sure that stealing music is legal?
The student didn't get his PC confiscated for distributing MP3. He was busted for distributing copyrighted music he didn't have the right to distribute (doesn't matter if he owned the original CD or not).
/. or EFF...
When some warez kiddies are busted for posting copies of Office 2000 - why doesn't the community rise up to protect him declaring: "Computer User Arrested For Distributing RAR files!" They are coming after the RAR format! They want to stiffle our ability to compress! Those bastards! They are trying to slow us down by making us send larger files! It's a plot by the ZIP format MiBs! They want to make us use large single ZIPs instead of chasing down and making repost requests for Photoshop55DoD.r32 or the SFV file.
Oh the hypocracy! I like playing a game. Every time I read about "Save Napster" or how it should be legal to steal music and distribute it - I just replace the appropriate words/terms with those for warez. Gee - don't ever see that on
db
Ignoring your mainly pathetic, ignorant, uneducated and obviously whiny central point - let me also dash your desire for Scram disk.
...
So you've got this encrypted volume with ultra super duper mega uncrackable security. Even the NSA can't break it - the only way in is by knowing your way obtuse and totally freaky weird password.
Guess what - it'll be effortless for police to get in. Why? Because they'll ask you for the password. Simple as that. "Joe, what is the password?" they'll say and expect you to answer correctly. You don't/won't? The judge will order you to or be found in contempt of court. Don't/won't? You'll go to jail - later be asked again. Still won't? You'll be found guilty of obstruction of justice and put in jail. Upon release you'll be asked again - won't do it? Repeat the above. AND you don't even have to be guilty of the original charge. No one cares at that point.
Oh - decide you want to install some "insto-delete-it-and-overwrite-it" software? Cops come in and you hit Ctl-Alt-Shift-Z and even the NSA can't read the drive. Into jail you go for destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice AND they'll prosecute you anyway and they will claim they say this or that on your system and have screen shots and print outs andyou'll have NOTHING to counter with other than "No, you're lying but I erased my proof cause I wanted to but I'm innocent."
So, Shmoe - feel better
I don' know who is more pathetically stupid, you or the person who moderated this crap upwards? Track you via your watermark to your credit card purchase of the CD? hahahahaha - and how, mr. brainiac, are they going to do that? And what if you paid by cash? Wow, there goes your entire theory ...
Well, there you have it- go and collect your $10,000 ... if you actually think that would work! ha!