If he has a right to ask for manual recounts was he obligated to ask for a statewide one or did he have the pick and choose?
He did, but he only asked for ones in the largely democratic counties which favor him. Its like being a "cafeteria christian" and picking out only the parts of a religion you like.
Why didn't bush ask for a manual recount of other counties didn't he have that right?
There was no need. He won Constitutionally. Gore is trying to Clinton his way into office. Concentration camps were legal under Nazi rule. But this isn't a legal issue, its of the Constitutional ilk.
The democrats were given TWELVE days for the recount while only FIVE were MANDATORY. This ruling was done by the Ouija Board ruling by the Florida State Supreme Court.
If you're down by a few points in a baseball game, you can't extend it into extra innings. There are rules to be followed. Even if you felt that the umpire made a bad call (although instant reply shows it to be a good call) you can't keep playing more and more innings until you are up by one then say its now fair. It's childish games six year olds play.
I thought Bush "trusted people" did he really mean that he trusted machines?
He does. I wouldn't trust ANYONE to count ballots other than an unbiased machine. People are exponentially more prone to error plus that whole bias thing comes into play.
You forgot to insert the words "hand" or manual" in front of recount[s]. This is much more prone to error than machines. Redirection my ass. I corrected his all counties bit. Troll elsewhere you mindless criminal democrat.
Few weeks? Try months. When W. is supposed to be elected president in January all it takes is one member of the Senate to disagree and the whole debacle will start again. Gore needs to step like he said he would back on the 17th when the vote is certified.
Lieberman wasn't announcing anything meaningful. What he had to say was known. He whined like a school girl. Meaningless rhetoric and discourse was all he spewed. Gore and Lieberman need to be kept to their words of conceding. What liars.
Gore needs to stop going to the courts as a backdoor into the white house. His actions may be declared legal by the courts settings a ouija board presedence though. Don't forget, Lieberman was the backer of many censorship bills as was Gump.
"The Accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." - James Madison, Federalist 47
You have had a FAIR count. Al Gump has just been allowed to play dirty and politicize the happenings. He is afraid since hillary has said she would like to run for Fuhr in 2004 and she would beat him like a woman. Plus Clinton/Gore type democrats are criminals who need to be executed.
I mean, doesn't that sound a little ridiculous to you?
Not nearly as silly as Al Gump saying he would concede the election once the votes had been certified. He said this on the 17th and three days later Lieberman said the same.
Gore has a right to ask for manual recounts under Florda law
You're half right there. Its in the Florida state statute where an automatic recount must be done if its less than 1/2% margin between candidates. He asked for extentions; he was given tripple the amount of time on the books. Yet its still not fair?
Gore offered recounts in all counties.
No he didn't. He only asked for recounts in heavily democratic counties: West Palm Beach, Broward, and Volusia. Each recount was done by error prone humans reading machine-like ballots. Humans dealing with this kind of volume is bound to favor him.
Manual recounts also occurred in Republican counties.
See above.
Gore was given almost triple the amount of time that he is required by law, and he still lost.
Certain aspects of government were taken out of the people's hands on purpose. They believe that by having state legislators elect its TWO representatives to the Senate, the naturally corrupt politicians would trigger enough in-fighting as yet another check on the accumulation of power. They believed that the average person couldn't be trusted totally to make all their decisions. And they are right.
*BSD experienced moderate success about 15 years ago in academic circles. Since then it has been in steady decline.
Yeah, you can thank BSD you're using TCP/IP rather than some assanine OSI protocol suite. BSD has never lost market share, its growing, just not as fast as the pimple faced 15 year old trolls on slashdot who just had mommy take them to CompUSA to get their very first Linux distro cd set.I beg you to show me a graph of BSD user-ship ever in a decline.
BSD is about 4 years behind Linux in terms of popularity while still being 2 ahead in performance alone.
Solaris isn't slow on Sun-type hardware and neither is Net/OpenBSD. In fact, its faster than Linux on sun4m and sun4c's. Why? Linux/sparc really needs to redo its MMU. gcc is pretty crappy on all non-x86 hardware. It's disgusting on Alpha's in particular. In case you have been tracking freebsd-alpha development, theres been talk of switching to ccc. SUNSpro is kickass btw.
FreeBSD pcmcia support isn't that great. The FreeBSD Japan group started PAO extentions for 3.x series but it hasn't really been merged in the 4.x branch. OpenBSD is the best for pcmcia support on notebooks though. Look into that.
Nice flame kiddie. Solaris on x86 is a joke. It's been dubbed "Slowaris." It also scales better than Linux so why use Linux then? If you want a tight system, best TCP stack (except those new zero copy sockets where Linux rules), and unstoppable performance, then FreeBSD is for you.
Yes many haven't had success with it yet but only a few have been charging. Most of the online companies aren't turning a profit, the venture capitol has run dry. So what do you do to get some money? You charge people who visit of course. Only a few have tried this and failed so imagine if most of them had a pay-per-view type service.
Sounds like flamebait. It sounds like you would have liked the Soviet Union. What the govertainment told the people was always right. I'll assume you come from either Washington or Maine with that kind of chowdah head liberal blind understanding.
Yes, the South lost the War of Northern Agression but wasn't it their right to declare themselves seperate if they wished? Now if you agree to that then you'd have to say the North was wrong for attacking the South since violence never solves anything. Well, thats what CNN told me. I hate everything Farakhan has to say but I'd die for his right to say it.
but, uh, anyway, no, if the people of South Carolina want to fly a confederate flag or swastika or rising sun or Union Jack or whatever on their public buildings, well, that's their business."
You're liberal ignorance really shows there son. Stars and Bars =! Swastika. The South was the first to elect a jewish man to Congress plus he was the same man to be the Secretary of War for the South. Try not to spew out liberal obfuscated rhetoric anymore. Sure a few crazy's who are neo-nazi's like the Stars and Bars but 99% of the Southerners HATE nazi's.
Don't forget, the north also used slaves during and little while after the War of Northern Aggression. All slaves captured were put to work for Yankees soldiers. They justified this as they were "contraband."
Listen, you toothless dumbass backwoods cracker feebs, the Civil War was a HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS AGO, and YOU LOST. Don't you think it's about time you, y'know, let it go?
It's not about that. Why let every state have its own flag then? They are proud of being from Texas, Ohio, New York, Maine, or California. I'm sure you're proud of your state being in whatever region.
Go troll elsewhere son. It's obvious you can only understand what CNN/NBC or the UN tell you whats right.
I live in Orlando and the hell he does. It's just a smear campaign at this point. Bush is a retard just as Gore is. Both of them will rape our rights. Each keeps talking about what HE is going to do with the surplus even as Congress is busy spending it all! Funny but no one in the Constitution does it give the Fuhr the right to spend the money, that power goes to Congress. Inflation will skyrocket with either one of them as they spend non-existant money. If you were a sentient person you'd either vote for Nader or Keyes. But since a Black Conservative is blasphemous to the media.....
...it targets kids who are 10 and under. It should be moved up at least three years into middle schools rather than keep it with kids who are still playing with Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
Note: The point below is to note that MacOSX is not a new flavour of unix, it's a new major version increment of NeXTSTEP. Note the internal version number consistancy. On MacOSX Server,
`uname -s` == "Rhapsody", `uname -r` == "5.7".
MacOSX = Rhapsody 5.7+
Rhapsody = OPENSTEP for Mach (product code name change as of Apple buyout)
OPENSTEP for Mach = NeXTSTEP (product name change as of Sun-NeXT co-released OpenStep spec.)
therefore (transitive property)
MacOSX = NeXTSTEP
The series, each of which is comprised of some version of Mach, BSD, Display Postscript, and Objective-C Frameworks:
BSD bits were taken from NetBSD and FreeBSD, with (I thought) some userland from OpenBSD.
EOF = Enterprise Object Framework - an Object-to-Relational Database adapter layer (very very good.)
Up until not too long ago, French was the international language for business. But since they got bitch-smacked in WW2 and their economy has floundered compared to others, English has taken the lead. Sure English semantics are sloppy, coherent grammar rules are non-existant, its not specific enough with its diction but what's gonna make English stick around for a long time to come is it's ability to absorb other languages into it.
When it comes to an "world" language, it'll either be some bastardized form of english (as if english isn't crucified by its own sanctity) or chinese (just because there are so damn many of them). I just don't like the idea of the UN telling me what language to speak.
Southerners....nyah try understanding all those chowdah heads up in the northeast.
Take Vouchers -- I advocate vouchers because public schools don't work compared to private schools. I also think that poor people should have the same ability to put their kids in the school of their choice as rich people. Yet Democrats usually oppose vouchers. Why, when the people it would help the most are poor people in bad schools?
So then what about the average middle class person whose kids are stuck in the shitty school? They can't afford private school either. Everything isn't black and white like vouchers insinuate.
Slashdot Mirror
He did, but he only asked for ones in the largely democratic counties which favor him. Its like being a "cafeteria christian" and picking out only the parts of a religion you like.
Why didn't bush ask for a manual recount of other counties didn't he have that right?
There was no need. He won Constitutionally. Gore is trying to Clinton his way into office. Concentration camps were legal under Nazi rule. But this isn't a legal issue, its of the Constitutional ilk.
The democrats were given TWELVE days for the recount while only FIVE were MANDATORY. This ruling was done by the Ouija Board ruling by the Florida State Supreme Court.
If you're down by a few points in a baseball game, you can't extend it into extra innings. There are rules to be followed. Even if you felt that the umpire made a bad call (although instant reply shows it to be a good call) you can't keep playing more and more innings until you are up by one then say its now fair. It's childish games six year olds play.
I thought Bush "trusted people" did he really mean that he trusted machines?
He does. I wouldn't trust ANYONE to count ballots other than an unbiased machine. People are exponentially more prone to error plus that whole bias thing comes into play.
You talk about a coup? What Gump is doing is a coup. Hillary is a criminal btw. I still wonder why only the clintons weren't indicted over whitewater.
agreed. But hillary has the love of the media and all those feminist groups. The mob rules unfortunately.
You forgot to insert the words "hand" or manual" in front of recount[s]. This is much more prone to error than machines. Redirection my ass. I corrected his all counties bit. Troll elsewhere you mindless criminal democrat.
Lieberman wasn't announcing anything meaningful. What he had to say was known. He whined like a school girl. Meaningless rhetoric and discourse was all he spewed. Gore and Lieberman need to be kept to their words of conceding. What liars.
Gore needs to stop going to the courts as a backdoor into the white house. His actions may be declared legal by the courts settings a ouija board presedence though. Don't forget, Lieberman was the backer of many censorship bills as was Gump.
"The Accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." - James Madison, Federalist 47
You have had a FAIR count. Al Gump has just been allowed to play dirty and politicize the happenings. He is afraid since hillary has said she would like to run for Fuhr in 2004 and she would beat him like a woman. Plus Clinton/Gore type democrats are criminals who need to be executed.
I mean, doesn't that sound a little ridiculous to you?
Not nearly as silly as Al Gump saying he would concede the election once the votes had been certified. He said this on the 17th and three days later Lieberman said the same.
You're half right there. Its in the Florida state statute where an automatic recount must be done if its less than 1/2% margin between candidates. He asked for extentions; he was given tripple the amount of time on the books. Yet its still not fair?
Gore offered recounts in all counties.
No he didn't. He only asked for recounts in heavily democratic counties: West Palm Beach, Broward, and Volusia. Each recount was done by error prone humans reading machine-like ballots. Humans dealing with this kind of volume is bound to favor him.
Manual recounts also occurred in Republican counties.
See above.
Gore was given almost triple the amount of time that he is required by law, and he still lost.
Certain aspects of government were taken out of the people's hands on purpose. They believe that by having state legislators elect its TWO representatives to the Senate, the naturally corrupt politicians would trigger enough in-fighting as yet another check on the accumulation of power. They believed that the average person couldn't be trusted totally to make all their decisions. And they are right.
Yeah, you can thank BSD you're using TCP/IP rather than some assanine OSI protocol suite. BSD has never lost market share, its growing, just not as fast as the pimple faced 15 year old trolls on slashdot who just had mommy take them to CompUSA to get their very first Linux distro cd set.I beg you to show me a graph of BSD user-ship ever in a decline.
BSD is about 4 years behind Linux in terms of popularity while still being 2 ahead in performance alone.
FreeBSD's pcmcia support in 4.x isn't that good compared to any MicroSoft OS, Linux or OpenBSD. Does that satisfy you?
Oh christ, my undernet comments have come back to haunt me! But come on, my posts have been in support of BSD yet again.
Solaris isn't slow on Sun-type hardware and neither is Net/OpenBSD. In fact, its faster than Linux on sun4m and sun4c's. Why? Linux/sparc really needs to redo its MMU. gcc is pretty crappy on all non-x86 hardware. It's disgusting on Alpha's in particular. In case you have been tracking freebsd-alpha development, theres been talk of switching to ccc. SUNSpro is kickass btw.
FreeBSD pcmcia support isn't that great. The FreeBSD Japan group started PAO extentions for 3.x series but it hasn't really been merged in the 4.x branch. OpenBSD is the best for pcmcia support on notebooks though. Look into that.
Probably, since slashdot linked to ISO's rather than the tgz's themselves. Not smart Hemos.
Nice flame kiddie. Solaris on x86 is a joke. It's been dubbed "Slowaris." It also scales better than Linux so why use Linux then? If you want a tight system, best TCP stack (except those new zero copy sockets where Linux rules), and unstoppable performance, then FreeBSD is for you.
Yes many haven't had success with it yet but only a few have been charging. Most of the online companies aren't turning a profit, the venture capitol has run dry. So what do you do to get some money? You charge people who visit of course. Only a few have tried this and failed so imagine if most of them had a pay-per-view type service.
Yes, the South lost the War of Northern Agression but wasn't it their right to declare themselves seperate if they wished? Now if you agree to that then you'd have to say the North was wrong for attacking the South since violence never solves anything. Well, thats what CNN told me. I hate everything Farakhan has to say but I'd die for his right to say it.
but, uh, anyway, no, if the people of South Carolina want to fly a confederate flag or swastika or rising sun or Union Jack or whatever on their public buildings, well, that's their business."
You're liberal ignorance really shows there son. Stars and Bars =! Swastika. The South was the first to elect a jewish man to Congress plus he was the same man to be the Secretary of War for the South. Try not to spew out liberal obfuscated rhetoric anymore. Sure a few crazy's who are neo-nazi's like the Stars and Bars but 99% of the Southerners HATE nazi's.
Don't forget, the north also used slaves during and little while after the War of Northern Aggression. All slaves captured were put to work for Yankees soldiers. They justified this as they were "contraband."
Listen, you toothless dumbass backwoods cracker feebs, the Civil War was a HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS AGO, and YOU LOST. Don't you think it's about time you, y'know, let it go?
It's not about that. Why let every state have its own flag then? They are proud of being from Texas, Ohio, New York, Maine, or California. I'm sure you're proud of your state being in whatever region.
Go troll elsewhere son. It's obvious you can only understand what CNN/NBC or the UN tell you whats right.
I live in Orlando and the hell he does. It's just a smear campaign at this point. Bush is a retard just as Gore is. Both of them will rape our rights. Each keeps talking about what HE is going to do with the surplus even as Congress is busy spending it all! Funny but no one in the Constitution does it give the Fuhr the right to spend the money, that power goes to Congress. Inflation will skyrocket with either one of them as they spend non-existant money. If you were a sentient person you'd either vote for Nader or Keyes. But since a Black Conservative is blasphemous to the media.....
...it targets kids who are 10 and under. It should be moved up at least three years into middle schools rather than keep it with kids who are still playing with Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
`uname -s` == "Rhapsody", `uname -r` == "5.7".
MacOSX = Rhapsody 5.7+ Rhapsody = OPENSTEP for Mach (product code name change as of Apple buyout) OPENSTEP for Mach = NeXTSTEP (product name change as of Sun-NeXT co-released OpenStep spec.)
therefore (transitive property)
MacOSX = NeXTSTEP
The series, each of which is comprised of some version of Mach, BSD, Display Postscript, and Objective-C Frameworks:
NeXTSTEP 1.x -4.4BSD-lite -Mach 2.5 -DPS -Objective-C + Appkit Framework
NeXTSTEP 2.x -4.4BSD-lite -Mach 2.5 + extensions -DPS -Objective-C + Appkit Framework
NeXTSTEP 3.0..3.3 -4.4BSD-lite -Mach 2.5 + more extensions -DPS -Obj-C + Appkit + Foundation Kit (early kit)
OPENSTEP 4.0..4.2 -4.4BSD-lite -Mach 2.5 + more extensions -DPS -Obj-C + New OpenStep frameworks + EOF
Rhapsody 5.x (Early Apple prototype) -4.4-lite -Mach 2.5 + blah blah -DPS -Obj-C + OpenStep core frameworks (Codenamed Yellowbox) + extensions + EOF
MacOSX Server 1.x (Rhapsody 5.7) same as the above, but stabler.
MacOSX 1.x (Rhapsody 5.x [where x -4.4BSD-lite -Mach 3 + fidly bits -DisplayPDF (Quartz) -Obj-C + enhanced OpenStep frameworks (Now called Cocoa) + EOF
BSD bits were taken from NetBSD and FreeBSD, with (I thought) some userland from OpenBSD. EOF = Enterprise Object Framework - an Object-to-Relational Database adapter layer (very very good.)
Actually he was a bastard. He was born out of wed-lock.
Your understanding of history must be non-existant then.
Look into SIEMENS over Nortel or Lucent. Their newer telephony products are based off of Solaris.
When it comes to an "world" language, it'll either be some bastardized form of english (as if english isn't crucified by its own sanctity) or chinese (just because there are so damn many of them). I just don't like the idea of the UN telling me what language to speak.
Southerners....nyah try understanding all those chowdah heads up in the northeast.
So then what about the average middle class person whose kids are stuck in the shitty school? They can't afford private school either. Everything isn't black and white like vouchers insinuate.