I agree, but I was just correcting the claim that temperature didn't affect water density. I was just pointing out they were thinking about pressure which really doesn't affect it much. But you are correct, it DOES affect it. and as others have said, pressure involves mass, so you could never, ever use something like that for setting a kg standard.
I was not advocating using water;) That would be nuts.
This *could* be possible I suppose, but not really how you think (I think).
I'm going to assume they are kept under a glass in a vacuum. If we suppose the glass sublimates in to the vacuum somehow, and then the glass is absorbed by the hunk of metal... The travel would make the travelling ones slightly older, and they would have had more time to absorb.
Or more likely, they have to remove the protection to measure the items and since the standard probably is measured less often, it is less contaminated. (This has nothing to do with your post)
I was under the impression that the burden of proof still lies with the accusing party. so i would imagine that the riaa would have to prove that you did.
They are techincally stored in a fashion similar to this (not really, they are split up so directory sizes don't grow too huge) but they appear in their normal folder trees. (you access them exactly as you would if you were network connected)
what you didn't get was the undertone of my post. i think the whole downsampling requirement is retarded, but it *does* exist. why people are surprised that vista respects that is what has me baffled.
our legal system has shown to be friendly to those who implemented this system. again, i state, what do you expect the OS to do? ignore it?
Since these things are required for them to be able to play blu-ray or hd-dvd content, what did you expect?
Did we honestly expect the largest OS vendor to create their OS to ignore the built in controls with the HD disk formats?
Get a proper hdmi supporting card and a proper hdmi monitor and you won't get down sampled output.
I think the whole thing is stupid as well, but this is an integral part of the hd formats. Reporting that Vista respects what is required to play these DRM laden formats "legally" is just pointless. What did you think they would do? Can you imagine the lawsuits? If your DRM'ed HD content is sent through a non-encrypted channel it gets downsampled. Gee whiz, who would have thought that... It's not like this has been common knowledge for years. Oh wait... Yes it has.
It's not like it will downsample non-drm'ed HD content.
(I have taken the slashdot approach and repeated the same thing many times in this post)
Slashdot Mirror
"oh, your app doesn't work? what? wine? HAHAHAHA.
install the app on what it's certified for and maybe you can get the support you're paying for."
You, umm, have no concept of the business IT world.
We've used coal for years. And how many people have died from the coal industry yearly?
Eventually, we're going to have to get a fear of the word nuclear...
Looks like some mod has an agenda and needs to read the mod guidelines ;)
Just because you don't like the truth, doesn't mean you should mark it troll.
I could get XP on any model. It was a concern of ours since none of our apps are certified for Vista yet.
And yes, I mean through Dell.
This is flat out incorrect.
As a business customer, XP has never been unavailable to me.
Furthermore, Vista (other than basic) OEM has always had downgrade rights as part of the license.
The funny thing about that *floating* ice is that it is already displacing its liquid volume of water ;)
That's supposed to be does it COUNT, not could.
I can't type early on Saturday mornings.
if your own people have to do it?
Yes, it does.
:)
but not like it does with temperature, and I was trying to just correct the original mistake
I agree, but I was just correcting the claim that temperature didn't affect water density. I was just pointing out they were thinking about pressure which really doesn't affect it much. But you are correct, it DOES affect it. and as others have said, pressure involves mass, so you could never, ever use something like that for setting a kg standard.
;) That would be nuts.
I was not advocating using water
I think you mean that the density of water is essentially invariant to pressure.
It very much fluctuates with temperature.
This *could* be possible I suppose, but not really how you think (I think).
I'm going to assume they are kept under a glass in a vacuum. If we suppose the glass sublimates in to the vacuum somehow, and then the glass is absorbed by the hunk of metal... The travel would make the travelling ones slightly older, and they would have had more time to absorb.
Or more likely, they have to remove the protection to measure the items and since the standard probably is measured less often, it is less contaminated. (This has nothing to do with your post)
hah.
at what temperature exactly?
wrong kind of troll
I was under the impression that the burden of proof still lies with the accusing party. so i would imagine that the riaa would have to prove that you did.
i suppose i am just . jaded due to all the deliberate misinformation that lives here. i see motive behind simple ignorance.
2 wrongs don't make a right (and before someone thinks they are witty.... 3 lefts yadda yadda yadda)
yes, i meant hdcp. i mistyped hdmi since the two are closely married in my head.
This is blatant misinformation.
They are techincally stored in a fashion similar to this (not really, they are split up so directory sizes don't grow too huge) but they appear in their normal folder trees. (you access them exactly as you would if you were network connected)
Why post flat out deceptive comments?
yes i meant hdcp.
what you didn't get was the undertone of my post. i think the whole downsampling requirement is retarded, but it *does* exist. why people are surprised that vista respects that is what has me baffled.
our legal system has shown to be friendly to those who implemented this system. again, i state, what do you expect the OS to do? ignore it?
Since these things are required for them to be able to play blu-ray or hd-dvd content, what did you expect?
Did we honestly expect the largest OS vendor to create their OS to ignore the built in controls with the HD disk formats?
Get a proper hdmi supporting card and a proper hdmi monitor and you won't get down sampled output.
I think the whole thing is stupid as well, but this is an integral part of the hd formats. Reporting that Vista respects what is required to play these DRM laden formats "legally" is just pointless. What did you think they would do? Can you imagine the lawsuits? If your DRM'ed HD content is sent through a non-encrypted channel it gets downsampled. Gee whiz, who would have thought that... It's not like this has been common knowledge for years. Oh wait... Yes it has.
It's not like it will downsample non-drm'ed HD content.
(I have taken the slashdot approach and repeated the same thing many times in this post)
Honestly, without a BES, there is no reason to use a BlackBerry :)
You would be better served by another device. The strength/advantages of BlackBerries is tied 100% to being connected to a BES.
No.
That is not the correct way to set up a BlackBerry in a corporate environment, sorry.
It sure can be used to pluralize certain things.
Your sentence has twelve s's in it.
BlackBerry
Treo