Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Sends Subpoena to Bush

Ariastis writes "Jack Thompson has filed documents with a federal court in Florida requesting to subpoena President George W. Bush for a deposition to retain Thompson's license to practice law. Ah, and Jeb Bush too, for good measure."

273 comments

  1. I'm torn by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole?

    1. Re:I'm torn by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something's on the tip of my tongue...

      turd... polish... still a turd...

      no, it's gone

    2. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole? Yes.
    3. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole?

      Uh...which "he"?

    4. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      The enemy of your enemy is usually also your enemy too.

      And if you don't believe that, then we should get a group together to play Risk. For money.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:I'm torn by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Licking your boyfriend's ass while posting to /.? Now that's kinky!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    6. Re:I'm torn by EricTheMad · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole? Rule 29: The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy, no more, no less. http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20030929.html
      --
      -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
    7. Re:I'm torn by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The enemy of your enemy is someone you can use against your enemy, and then steamroll later when his/her defenses are down. Best friend I ever had=)

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    8. Re:I'm torn by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      The enemy of your enemy is someone, who, with any luck, will eliminate your enemy while getting killed themselves. However, he is most definitely still an arsehole.

    9. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, I'm not inviting you to my Risk game since you already know my strategy.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:I'm torn by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      Rule 29: On the internet, all girls are men and all kids are undercover FBI agents.

      http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Rul es_Of_The_Internet

    11. Re:I'm torn by Poltras · · Score: 3, Funny

      turd... polish... still a turd...
      What the hell has a turd from Poland anything to do with the on-hand topic? This is serious!
    12. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule 34: There's gotta be Jack Thompson porn out there somewhere.

    13. Re:I'm torn by dcclark · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the words of a friend,

      The enemy of my enemy is... a low priority!

    14. Re:I'm torn by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      and if there isn't, someone on /b will make some in photoshop.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    15. Re:I'm torn by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      The enemy of your enemy is usually also your enemy too.

      And if you don't believe that, then we should get a group together to play Risk. For money.


      Sounds good. You come on over and we'll play Risk. You, me, and a friend of mine will be playing. (The two of us will split your part of the money after you've lost)

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    16. Re:I'm torn by skam240 · · Score: 0

      Risk? Blech.

      Why don't you just cut out the board and play craps. All both amount to is the roll of dice.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    17. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But see you've reversed the implication. That's "My friend is an enemy of my enemy" and that's normally true. If you assumed the other guy was your "friend" for no reason other than that he was also my enemy, you'd be setting yourself up for an unpleasant surprise.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll admit chance plays a significant role in Risk, but if you really believe that, try using the dice to decide where you place your armies and what countries to attack and I'd beat you 100% of the time.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    19. Re:I'm torn by aichpvee · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Slashdot: nearly a million monkeys, but still no Hamlet."

      Give us forever, we'll get there eventually.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    20. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Jack, welcome to the No-Fly List! hahahahaha snort cough bleeert

    21. Re:I'm torn by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Here is the story:

      "Wacky Jacky is currently suing the mediator, Judge Dava Tunis, along with the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar.

      Thompson's reasons for subpoenaing The President are a bit esoteric and would make great fodder for an X-Files episode or anything else in the realm of conspiracy theories and Science Fiction. This bit of paranoia stems from the "nefarious" Blank Rome law firm, which represents the defendants in the Strickland vs. Sony lawsuit where an 18-year old in Alabama was allegedly under the influence of Grand Theft Auto when he murdered two police officers and a police dispatcher in 2004. Apparently, the "evil" Blank Rome firm are lobbyists as well as Republican donors and Thompson believes that the law firm was the main culprit in having him thrown off the case by an Alabama Circuit Court judge in November, 2005.

      The Bar complaints filed by Judge Tunis are in relation to this case and Thompson's conduct when he failed to have Bully declared a public nuisance last October.
      " [ Gaming Today - Sept. 7, 2007]

      Ahh Wacky Jacky.... When will you ever learn that the world hates you and these donkey shows amount to nothing?

      _____
      "A little violence never killed anybody!"

    22. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's /b/ newsfag

    23. Re:I'm torn by wamerocity · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that is hilarious. You win slashdot for today.

      --
      "Thank you for using Stop-n-Drop, America's favorite suicide booth since 2008"
    24. Re:I'm torn by Drathos · · Score: 1

      >Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole?

      Uh...which "he"? Does it make any difference?
      --
      End of line..
    25. Re:I'm torn by DotWarner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never polish a turd on the tip of your tongue.

    26. Re:I'm torn by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how this will play out...

      Jack: Mr. Bush, multiplayer kill-simulators are training young children to become killers.
      Bush: Kill...simulators?
      Jack: Yes. An example would be Counter-strike, where a player can be counter-terrorist or terrorist-
      Bush: TERRORIST!
      Jack: Yes, yes. Terrorist. And they play over the internet-
      Bush: The internets? Do they use The Google?
      JacK: Uhh...I'm sure they do...
      Bush: So The Google and the Internets are related to terrorists!
      Jack: Well, no...
      Bush: Put me through to Homeland Security! Every person found using the Internets will be taken into custody!
      Jack: Not what I was looking for...but works either way.

      ~Jarik

    27. Re:I'm torn by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that is best strategy, then again maybe it's only one of the many optimal strategies formed by the complex polyhedron. Then again it could be both. . .wow that "intro to game theory" course was pretty interesting. Long story short, can you think of a better way to win? I tend to play defensively and convince other players that if they attack me I will assure they will lose by devoting all my resources to attacking them back, then after a few card sets have been turned in I try to steamroll the weakest players first.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    28. Re:I'm torn by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Well, would you prefer a turd Danish?

      Tell me when it gets disgusting.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:I'm torn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know, what's REALLY scary is that I wouldn't call that dialog impossible.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:I'm torn by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on who you are. If you're the US, the enemy of your enemy is someone you arm and hope that he hates your enemy more than you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:I'm torn by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Um... aren't *I* the enemy of my enemy?

    32. Re:I'm torn by Prune · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    33. Re:I'm torn by Frnknstn · · Score: 0

      This was modded insightful? I think Slashdot mods have expectations that are a little low...

      --
      If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
    34. Re:I'm torn by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      And then ten years later you decide that person has outlived his usefulness so you start a war with them and supposrt someone that hates him. The cycle continues...

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    35. Re:I'm torn by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem I have with Risk is that I can (and often do) see a good strategy break down because of bad dice rolls, which is pretty much the most frustrating experience ever. For some ungodly reason, whenever I play with my dad, he always rolls high, I always roll low. It gets painful after a while.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    36. Re:I'm torn by mistermiyagi · · Score: 0

      I'll vote for giant douche.

    37. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!

    38. Re:I'm torn by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      No we won't. I just tried to post the complete text of Hamlet in this comment via Project Gutenberg, and Slashdot doesn't allow it (no explanation was given, just an error that there was no discussion to comment on). It seems it is too long or something.

    39. Re:I'm torn by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And if you run out of substitutes, you send your own army to Afghanistan. And make another ton of cash, while getting rid of your unemployed (whose jobs are now somewhere in that area, too) as well.

      Don't you just love win-win situations?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    40. Re:I'm torn by skam240 · · Score: 1

      My point was that the game is entirely too luck based. Most games I've seen pan out to the person who rolled the best, not the person who employed the best strategy.

      There are a plethora of strategy games out there that match the simplicity of risk but are far less luck base. Wander down to your local game shop and ask around.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    41. Re:I'm torn by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I think another key is to capture Australia or (less preferably due to its dual entries) South America early. Stay the heck out of Europe and Asia (except to prevent a monopoly). Don't thin yourself out too much. Like you said, kill weakest first, mainly to steal their cards.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
  2. Rotaderp .sv Neila by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's sorta like Alien vs. Predator, but backwards. Whoever loses, we win.

    1. Re:Rotaderp .sv Neila by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out that "predator" backward is "rotaderp". That deserves +5, Funny all by itself.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  3. Prepare for cranial explosions! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson vs. George Bush - whatever are slashdotters to do?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...sell tickets? Get popcorn and soda?

    2. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by mconeone · · Score: 5, Funny

      My guess is that it's to prove that if Bush can be completely incompetent and misguided as President, then Thompson has the right to do so as a lawyer.

    3. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait until January 20, 2009, that's what.

      Most likely, Bush will be able to claim executive privelege and force Thompson to wait until then.

      All Thompson is trying to do is stick a monkey wrench in the works, delaying the end of his disbarrment hearing in front of the Florida Bar.

      The guy's a whack job. Seriously, he needs to get a life. He's tried to sue the Florida Bar more than once, a clear violation of the 11th Amendment (which says you can't sue the court system).

    4. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bar associations are not courts. They're unions for lawyers. You can sue unions. You can sue bar associations.

    5. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Wait until January 20, 2009, that's what.

      Most likely, Bush will be able to claim executive privelege and force Thompson to wait until then."

      NEWSFLASH: former Atty. Jack Thompson, has mysteriously been shipped to Gitmo. Coincedentally, said subpoena has been withdrawn.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative
      Try again, this time understanding something about the structure of the court system in Florida. The Florida Bar is an agent of the Supreme Court of Florida:

      Article V, Section 15 of the Constitution of the State of Florida gives the Supreme Court of Florida exclusive and ultimate authority to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline of those persons who are admitted to practice. The Court performs those official functions through two separate arms: the Florida Board of Bar Examiners , which screens, tests and certifies candidates for admission to the practice; and The Florida Bar, the investigative and prosecutorial authority in the lawyer regulatory process. Neither of these two agencies, nor any of their functions, is supported by state tax dollars
      (source)


    7. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll never forget the stories a good friend of mine used to tell about his job as a vet tech for the Henry Villas Zoo, specifically the monkey house. To quote...

      "When in doubt, throw poo"

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    8. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest we lock them both in a room and don't open the door until both of them are dead. If then.

    9. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Bar associations and Bars are very different entities.

    10. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm hoping that it's a trick for the president to set a precedent of answering to subpoenas. Hopefully during the next administration, there will be quiet a number of neocons called to take the stand.

      --
      We are all just people.
    11. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      IANAL. There are exceptions to the 11th amendment. Generally you can sue for injunctive relief in federal court, but not for damages.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    12. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats to stop jacky-boy from asking dubya about fired US attorneys while he's on the stand? ;) /obvousily not a lawyer :P

    13. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Two men enter, one man leaves...and then we kill him.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, but it must involve Cowboy Neal.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    15. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      You mean that there is no association between them?

    16. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by kjs3 · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have to claim executive privilege, per se. The sitting President enjoys immunity from civil liability. See Jones v. Clinton.

    17. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by bigsam411 · · Score: 0

      Jack Thompson vs. George Bush - whatever are slashdotters to do?
      I for one just simulated what would happen!!!
    18. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 1

      That's easy. As long as they are busy with each other they can't do as much harm as usually.

    19. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the other day Bush called the APEC conference the "OPEC" conference (and corrected himself), and that he thanked his host, John Howard, for the "Austrian" troops participating in Iraq (and didn't correct himself), Thompson might be able to make a case of it.

    20. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all Thompson has to do is trick Bush into standing up?

  4. wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet you Slashbots are just foaming at the mouth.

    1. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by powerpants · · Score: 0

      This, written within seconds of the story going live.

    2. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not yet, Microsoft and Gates need to also be in the mix.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    3. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hahaha listen, here's the first rule of Slashdot - you don't get to make fun of the rest of the web for being the same opinion-reinforcing feedback loop that this place is.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      i thought it was you don't talk about slashdot...

    5. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it has to insult linux, call evolution a fake, and then be found out to all be the working of the RIAA, funded by Sony who is working for the CIA. Then you'd have a lot of angry /.er...or at least angrier than normal...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    6. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      So that's why I keep getting kicked out of those fight clubs. I mean... aw crap.

    7. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      Same story!? Try the same building

      That'll take some security.

    8. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by dokebi · · Score: 1

      Actually, some bill criminalizing hentai would do a better job.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    9. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by paimin · · Score: 1
      I think you're onto something here...we could be on the verge of the ultimate /. flamebait. Let's see, can we fit the following into a single story?

      • Jack Thompson
      • Bush's
      • Microsoft, Ballmer, Gates, etc.
      • Sony
      • Apple
      • Google
      • SCO
      • RIAA
      • anti-Linux/OSS fud
      • BSD is dead

      My god, the mind boggles. Surely I've missed at least half.

      Anyone up to the task?
      --
      Facebook is the new AOL
    10. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by lanswitch · · Score: 1
      • ???
      • profit
    11. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      No, that's the first rule from the dating handbook.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  5. i said it before, i'll say it again... by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived Perhaps we can build a bridge to nowhere for him to live under?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived and that's coming from circletimessquare!
    3. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Could only have gotten lessons from Klerck... RIP

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Alaska?

    5. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      wrong kind of troll

    6. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by subreality · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he belongs on a "greatest trolls ever" list somewhere, but I think Thompson should come in below:

        * Mahatma Gandhi
        * Michael Moore
        * Jonathan Swift
        * Fred Phelps
        * Osama bin Laden

      Adolph Hitler should get honorable mention for severe disruption of political discourse for well over half a century, but he doesn't get to be on the list because I'm pretty sure that wasn't his motive.

    7. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I don't see Thompson successfully accomplishing his goals (assuming a successful law practice, making a good living and getting laws against violent games passed were among of his major goals, he's pretty much the equivalent of Gandhi never getting past running for dog-catcher, or Jonathan Swift only getting a nibble from a guy who already wants to publish an Irish Baby cookbook).
            It's too soon to tell with Michael Moore - he could definitely make a documentary where his editing crossed into such blatant propagandizing that he lost just about all his viewers, but so far, and right or wrong, he's kept a sizable and increasing audience.
            I'm not sure about Fred Phelps - sometimes I think his big goal is to become a martyr, so maybe he's not doing so great either. Just remember, when people laughed at Gandhi, he ended up winning anyway (by his own quote), but laughing Fred off the political stage means he loses.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Is there ever a 'right' kind of troll?

    9. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by Don_dumb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aww, now you'll have the anti-silicate defamation league up in arms. They'll send Detritus around and he'll set you straight.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    10. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by mink · · Score: 1

      Unless he finds out you have been selling Slab to troll childern, then me might nail you to the wall by your ears.

      This message brough to you by the campaign to stop people selling slab to troll childern.

      Remember!
      Slab: jus' say 'AarrgharrghpleeassennononoUGH'

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  6. good luck with that by hguorbray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering that not even congress can get Bush, Rumsfield, Cheny et al to respond to subpoenas -or even off the record chats ire the Plame affair, the attorney firings etc (maybe they can get Gonzales now that he has stepped down) I don't think he's got a prayer.

    And when he loses his license he can blame Bush -just like everyone else

    -I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:good luck with that by arivanov · · Score: 0

      You are missing something.

      Ask yourself the following questions:

      1. Who won for Bush and Co the Y2K election? Who mobilised a certain part of the American population to vote for the righteous man and who taught them who is the righteous man this time?
      2. Who is one of the major supporters of Mr Thompson?

      Add 2 and 2 ...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus?

    3. Re:good luck with that by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      People voting republican + Hillary Clinton = 4?

    4. Re:good luck with that by grolschie · · Score: 1

      You are missing something.

      Ask yourself the following questions:

      1. Who won for Bush and Co the Y2K election? Who mobilised a certain part of the American population to vote for the righteous man and who taught them who is the righteous man this time?
      2. Who is one of the major supporters of Mr Thompson?

      Add 2 and 2 ...

      Jesus?

      Je...Jes...don't you kids know anything? The Serpent of Rehaboam?
      [the kids look blank]
      The Well of Zohassadar?
      [the kids look blank]
      The Bridal Feast of Beth Chedruharazzeb?
    5. Re:good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's standard practice to remove the opposing parties appointments. The hypocrisy of the liberals knows no bounds. They do the same shit when they are in office.

      The dems are just throwing anything up in the air that they can in an effort to create big enough dustcloud you'll forget what an evil bitch the hilda-beast is.

  7. The Time Is Approaching by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The time is approaching when someone is going to have to put this guy in the nut house. I hope all those self-serving pandering politicians who like to align themselves with Thompson against the invented evils of video games start seriously considering the kind of delusional maniac they've decided is their ally.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      No, no, we want him to stick around. as long as that idiot is doing his baboon act on television on a regular basis everyone will point, laugh, and ignore what his friends are saying.

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    2. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Leftist+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      The time is approaching when someone is going to have to put this guy in the nut house.

      I agree, but we need to do something about that Thompson guy too.

    3. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that Bush agrees to appear in court, but the Secret Service won't let them be in the same room until Thompson undergoes psychiatric evaluation. Which would then be public, of course.

    4. Re:The Time Is Approaching by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      as long as that idiot is doing his baboon act on television on a regular basis everyone will point, laugh, and ignore No, no, he was talking about Thompson.
    5. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      I was also talking about Thompson.

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    6. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your preaching to the choir there buddy, anybody reading this site has thought Jack is two bricks short a load for years now.

    7. Re:The Time Is Approaching by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I hope all those self-serving pandering politicians who like to align themselves with Thompson against the invented evils of video games start seriously considering the kind of delusional maniac they've decided is their ally.

      Not likely. Probably 80% of those politicians are just as sociopathic as he is, just more subtle.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Which would then be public, of course.

      If they got any sense for business, it's on pay per view.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:The Time Is Approaching by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Hint: look at the other man mentioned in the article title.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  8. Who's next by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Funny

    CowboyNeal!

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:Who's next by brouski · · Score: 1

      Finally a CowboyNeal option that makes sense!

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  9. So Jack is a Conspiracy Loon by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Funny that never came up before. If we'd all known this, he probably would have gotten a lot less attention.

  10. Uh-oh. by seebs · · Score: 1

    What if he manages to persuade Bush that video games might be somehow related to terrorism, or non-Christians?

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Uh-oh. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Suing people in power is usually not considered the most effective form of lobbying.

  11. Alcoa makes a fortune by meme_vector · · Score: 1

    Alcoa must make a fortune off of Mr. Thompson since he must keep a giant roll of tin foil in his briefcase to constuct new headgear.

    1. Re:Alcoa makes a fortune by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      There's no aluminum in tin foil.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    2. Re:Alcoa makes a fortune by ddddan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You mean aluminium :)

  12. That Must Be Some Good Crack by noc007 · · Score: 1

    He has to be smoking something seriously. Either that or he's doing this as another publicity stunt.

  13. Subpoena as evidence? by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, now that I've trolled in another post, I'm wondering if the folks trying to get him kicked out of the Bar could enter the subpoena ITSELF as evidence of JT's unfitness to practice law.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok, now that I've trolled in another post, I'm wondering if the folks trying to get him kicked out of the Bar could enter the subpoena ITSELF as evidence of JT's unfitness to practice law.


      I don't know if it can be directly referenced or not. Is it necessary? The guy's record speaks for itself. This delicious piece of irony is just icing on the cake.

      I'm more concerned about his fitness to walk down the street. I really do think Thompson is completely out of his mind. I think what's needed after the disbarment is a 30 day psychiatric review in a closed facility. Maybe there's some meds they can give him.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Perseid · · Score: 1

      Wow. And then...and then he can use that as reason to get another subpoena which his opponents can use as evidence..and...and...

      BOOM!

    3. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Ok, now that I've trolled in another post, I'm wondering if the folks trying to get him kicked out of the Bar could enter the subpoena ITSELF as evidence of JT's unfitness to practice law.

      I know from my dealings with a lawyer due to a negligent, threatening, [expletive deleted] landlord that there are certain parts of the legal process that are not admissible as evidence as court. I'm not sure where all that extends, but I know it covers at least part of pre-trial settlement communication.

      I curse your name, my landlord, I curse your name (as soon as the case is settled).
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    4. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Rycross · · Score: 1

      He's already had a psychiatric review, on court order. Turns out he's sane, at least according to one psychiatrist. I think its more likely that he's a publicity whore. Sending a subpoena to the president smells of publicity stunt anyway. I mean, really, what can Bush of all people add to his case? Bush probably doesn't even know who this guy is.

    5. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Darby · · Score: 3, Funny

      .Maybe there's some meds they can give him.

      KCN perhaps?

    6. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      You can refer to subpoenas in a court proceeding, as well as just about every other filing. If you couldn't do that, you'd never be able to bring a charge for malicious prosecution.

    7. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Psychosis has been suggested in the past, but unfortunately those who examined him claim to have found nothing wrong, and sent him packing with a large "SANE" rubber stamp in red ink on the back of his hand. I guess that means they'll never be able to make it stick.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    8. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupidity!=Insanity

    9. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If Thompson is that stupid, then how the hell did he get to be a lawyer? No, I think he's a fruitcake.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Schäuble managed to become minister of interior in Germany, despite being a clinic case of paranoia due to an attempted assassination that forced him into a wheelchair. Just because a shrink says someone's ok doesn't mean they really are. After all, even shrinks have to eat and want to continue their work, which could become kinda complicated if they piss off the wrong people.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      You can refer to subpoenas in a court proceeding, as well as just about every other filing. If you couldn't do that, you'd never be able to bring a charge for malicious prosecution.
      Well, maybe I didn't really know that after all. :-)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    12. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      By this point, I suspect that no one of importance is going to be pissed off by Thompson being declared insane.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  14. sounds to me by to_kallon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jack is currently suing the mediator, Judge Dava Tunis, along with the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar.

    like he's a lawyer, alright...

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:sounds to me by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Consider this - President Bush shows up, but wearing a Master Chiefs' costume.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:sounds to me by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Suing the person that's meant to be mediating the dispute is taking things a little far, even for him... If he keeps suing the judges and courts, who's going to finally judge the case, and where? If you want to use the legal system to your advantage, you can't sue it... I would have thought a lawyer would realise that.

    3. Re:sounds to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      along with the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar.

      How does that work, anyway? "Give me a license to sue people, or I'll sue you"?

    4. Re:sounds to me by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Suing the person that's meant to be mediating the dispute is taking things a little far, even for him... If he keeps suing the judges and courts, who's going to finally judge the case, and where? If you want to use the legal system to your advantage, you can't sue it... I would have thought a lawyer would realise that.


      AFAIR, this won't be Jack' first time filing against a judge in one of his cases. Whenever he doesn't like a judge, he has convinced himself that suing the judge will result in a conflict of interest, and force the judge to recuse himself, allowing him to arbitrarily judge-shop until he finds somebody he thinks will kow-tow to his bullshit for fear of being sued.

      Unfortunately for Jack, there is no clear precedent requiring a judge to recuse himself if he gets sued by someone involved in a case he is judging. Naturally, this is because such a precedent would enable exactly what Jack wants. IIRC, the last judge he sued didn't recuse himself because of being sued, but eventually did recuse himself because there was a conflict of interest arising from the fact that the judge was filing a formal complaint about Jack being an asshat.
    5. Re:sounds to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is going to give me nightmares.

    6. Re:sounds to me by dkf · · Score: 1

      Suing the person that's meant to be mediating the dispute is taking things a little far, even for him... If he keeps suing the judges and courts, who's going to finally judge the case, and where? I don't know how things work where you are, but in the UK people who do that tend to get declared to be Vexatious Litigants and can end up losing the right to take cases to the law. Now, if someone can't bring any cases before the law, can you imagine just how thoroughly everyone else can mess them over? Now to my (non-expert) eyes, it seems that Jack is going for just such a declaration...
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    7. Re:sounds to me by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm British, but I didn't know that. Very interesting, thanks for pointing it out. After reading that Wikipedia page, it appears you can still sue if you get the permission of a judge, and the restriction lasts a limited time, so everyone can't mess them over *too* thoroughly.

  15. What if.... ha... you almost had me there. by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then he'll make elaborate laws that restrict our rights with promises that it will stop video game-ism, only to have video games become better at hiding, stockpiling weapons, and money laundering.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    1. Re:What if.... ha... you almost had me there. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      You know, all he has to do is point out that Microsoft Flight Simulator used to allow you to crash into the World Trade Center. However, that would result in a positive good plus a negative bad and result in a positive goodnotgood for him (and us, I think).

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  16. ObHomer by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Can't he be both, like the late Earl Warren?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:ObHomer by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      haha... only the flyboys among us will understand this. :)

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  17. Jack Picture by Dan667 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone have a picture of this guy. You cannot make up some of the stuff this guy does and I am curious to see if you can see the crazy in his eye.

    1. Re:Jack Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Posting as anon to avoid karma whoring, but you can readily find pictures of him.

      Try his wikipedia entry here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorn ey)

      Or just google image search him? There are non-photos of him there, but you should easily be able to tell which is which.
      http://images.google.ca/images?client=firefox-a&ch annel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hl=en&q =jack+Thompson+&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2

    2. Re:Jack Picture by djones101 · · Score: 1

      You can see a picture here. You can't see the crazy in his eye, but he looks old and crotchety enough to have forgotten to zip up his fly.

    3. Re:Jack Picture by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you can't see the crazy here ... well, stop looking.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:Jack Picture by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Anyone have a picture of this guy. You cannot make up some of the stuff this guy does and I am curious to see if you can see the crazy in his eye.
      You be the judge!
      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    5. Re:Jack Picture by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what would be worse the photo of Jack or the goatse I was expecting...

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    6. Re:Jack Picture by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Okay...Hmmm....

      Normally I would say something like: 'you must be new here'.

      In this case, I might have to say:'maybe you've been here too long', but I can see the association with JT and Goatse-Ewwhhh!

      Now I have to go scrub my brain with bleach.

      Why didn't I just go to bed when I got home from work?

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  18. Re:I've seen Thompson on Law and Order by Gaerek · · Score: 1, Informative

    You might have been being sarcastic, but if not...wrong Thompson. Fred Thompson was on Law and Order. Jack Thompson is the asshole...

  19. Re:Liberals control the justice system by Pojut · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Never forget my dear coward...the media is only as liberal as its conservative owners.

  20. New Video Game by securityfolk · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to write an ultra-violent video game where Jack Thompson goes on a hunting trip with Cheney... wait - on second thought, he shouldn't get off that easy.

    1. Re:New Video Game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily ... just make sure the rendered Cheney has one of these.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  21. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get off your high horse. Jack Thompson is of interest around here, because of his links to the anti-gaming lobby. It's Friday, it's a hilarious story, and we're all enjoying it. You know who Thompson is, if you have been around for a while. That's like asking "Which Bill Gates? How should I know?"

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  22. Friendly subpoena? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could he be calling Bush as a friendly witness? Since I would imagine that violence in video games is sinful, and W. sure loved the Jesus (Jeb, not so much), it might be for the President to excuse him from having to report to the bar. Maybe he wants to get on the short list for the open AG spot!

    Jack Thompson for Attorney General!

  23. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Pojut · · Score: 1

    No disrespect intended, especially considering your triple-digit UID...but uh...GTFO.

    I realize that my UID doesn't back this up, but I have read /. for years...just never got an inkling to post anything until the past year or so...

    But Seriously. You come off as a cranky old coot. Uphill both ways and such.

  24. Re:I've seen Thompson on Law and Order by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    You might have been being sarcastic, but if not...wrong Thompson. Fred Thompson was on Law and Order. Jack Thompson is the asshole...
    And yet both are clearly detached from reality.
    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  25. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by coug_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because you don't know the name Jack Thompson, doesn't mean that most geeks/nerds don't immediately know who he is. You'll also note that this story is tagged as "humor" not as "gaming", so to be perfectly honest, it could be *any* lunatic lawyer that's issued a subpoena for the President in defense for the deposition of his license to practice law. The fact that it's Jack Thompson just makes it better for those of us who know who he is (which, I'm sorry, I would bet that there are more of us who do than those who don't).

  26. Stranger Than Fiction by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2

    Every time I see a story involving Jack Thompson, I wonder if it's some guy making stuff up - this guy is stranger than fiction...

    1. Re:Stranger Than Fiction by AusIV · · Score: 1

      I agree. As much as I despise everything Jack Thompson stands for, I don't want him to disappear because I'm often amused by the sheer retardedness of his methods. Since I don't think I've ever read about Jack Thompson on anything more credible than slashdot or wikipedia, I occasionally find myself wondering if he could be a work of fiction.

  27. At least.. by CokeJunky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    he can claim that gaming has driven at least one person to raving lunacy... Himself! (at least in my personal opinion.)

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
    1. Re:At least.. by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      Raving lunacy might be an overstatement. I would guess he's bipolar.

      One day he's the champion of all that is good and holy.
      Next day a single email asking reasonable questions scares him shitless
      Then he's up to debating with anyone or doing anything
      Then he assumes that a PAX invitation is a trap to kill him.
      Then he's above the FL justice system
      Then there's a conspiracy against him in Florida
      Then he's mighty enough that the president of the USA must answer to him personally.

      I'm not even sure I'm even exaggerating with this list. This guy needs medication.

  28. Pardon by WhiteRider · · Score: 0

    If Jack would've went to school to become a lawyer, instead of print out a document that says "I can sue people for stupid reasons", he would've known that he should've caused all these problems when Clinton was President.

    Then he would've received a Presidential pardon for the heinous crimes he's committed against gamers everywhere.

  29. stuck in court by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fogive my ignorance of the US legal system but my understanding from TFA is that because they wont respond to his supeona that the disbarment is stuck in limbo for the time being at least? Could the bar board just ask relavence of these people and discount these supeonas? What would be next, him sending supeonas to dead people or the children of pregnant women?

    1. Re:stuck in court by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fogive my ignorance of the US legal system but my understanding from TFA is that because they wont respond to his supeona that the disbarment is stuck in limbo for the time being at least?

      Nope. His theory is he may have to wait until Bush leaves office for the subpoena to be issued, which he is willing to wait for. Even if he got the subpoena issued and Bush didn't show up for deposition, that doesn't automatically put the federal case in limbo either, he'd have to ask for a continuance.

      The disbarment isn't being decided by the federal court; I'm guessing from the article (which isn't too detailed) is he's suing to stop the disbarment proceedings.

      He thinks he can game the system, but he's pretty much at the end of his rope. The Florida Bar may have been willing to settle cases in the past with him just to avoid the headache, but there's too much pressure, and his tactics have gotten so weird that they won't be able to just let it go this time.

      I don't think he actually believes that Bush will show up, he probably just thinks if he makes a big enough mess for the courts, judges, mediators and the bar that they'll just give in and let him keep his license.

  30. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be new here.

  31. Don't trust everyone on your side by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't think you understand.
    The guy is loony.
    This is not the kind of person you want arguing for your side & case.

    Seriously.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  32. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is relevant to gaming in that Jack Thompson is perhaps the most vocal critic of gaming and the gaming community there is. Him going off the deep end like this hurts his case, so its a good thing for the rest of us.

    Besides, the story has the Foot next to it. It's funny. Laugh.

  33. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by everphilski · · Score: 1

    but... omg... when he makes himself look bad I can laugh and feel better about myself!!!!!

    (sigh, I happen to agree with you. let this guy fade into obscurity)

  34. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters." Anyone else remember when that was "News for Nerds ON THE Stuff that Matters?"

    No, I don't remember that, and I remember the first day when Chips N' Dips was dead and Slashdot was live. Was it really different? Because I really don't remember it having "on the" in there, which really reduces the punchiness of the tag line and really I doubt would make any difference regarding the content. As if they said "whew, now that we got rid of 'on the' we can start posting irrelevant nerdy stuff, and non-nerdy relevant stuff!"

    Anyway, this is a story about Jack Thompson being a nut job in trying to prove he isn't a nut job. JT is a /. whipping-boy due to his long standing aggression against games, and we love to see stories where he makes himself look insane. Yeah, it's like replying to a bad troll, we're only giving him the attention he wants, but still it amuses me. Much like stories about every little decision and motion in SCO's ongoing slow death spiral isn't very important, but simply amusing for those of us who've been watching. The fact that SCO was a major Linux antagonist has given them a position of relevance. Similarly, because he's the "anti-gaming lawyer", JT and his legal antics are a relevant slashdot topic, like it or not. Like we used to say back when someone would complain about an article's appropriateness for slashdot: "It's Rob's site".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  35. Re:I've seen Thompson on Law and Order by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    Yes. I was joking. But sadly, no one seemed to get that.

  36. Re:Liberals control the justice system by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    And a good chunk of the media as well.

    It's no coincidence that companies like Disney and Rockstar gang up on the few people that dare to stand up for values that are so fundamental to the working of our society. They are in the business of making money through the spread of violence, hip hop and pedophelia to the lesser minded people.

    I hope that Jack Thompson wins, not only this battle but the entire war. Else, it might be worth thinking about kicking out the democrats and their valued pedophile constituents back to New York and then going our own way.


    And on the next episode of M*A*S*H, Klinger tries to get his Section 8 by impersonating a lawyer and subpoening Harry Truman, General Douglas MacArthur and the Andrew Sisters.
    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  37. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's a really nice rant, and I agree with you somewhat in your general assertion that Slashdot has drifted pretty far away from being a nerd site (WTF is up with the Politics section, for example). However, I have some issues:

    1.) I haven't been around quite as long as you have, but I don't recall the slogan ever being "News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters". That may have been the original intent, but I don't think that was ever the actual slogan. The oldest page from Slashdot I could find on web.archive.org is from November, 1998, which was prior to the Andover.net buyout (thereby presumably before the major corporate influence began). On that page, the slogan is "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters."

    Now, I grant you, prior to maybe 5 or 6 years ago, the "stuff that matters FOR NERDS" was sort of implied, but that hasn't really been the case for a long, long time.

    2.) Jack Thompson has been going after the gaming industry for a long time. Seeing his long, slow descent into madness is of great interest to gaming nerds, even if not to you particularly. Even if you decide that the site should be limited only to things that the typical nerd would care about (not your decision or mine to make), this still would fit that category.

    So, even though I agree with you that Slashdot in general has strayed pretty far from its roots (but what site this old hasn't), I disagree with you about this particular story.

  38. One good send deserves another by NJVil · · Score: 4, Funny

    George Bush sends Jack Thompson to Guantanamo

    1. Re:One good send deserves another by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how many /.ers, who are against Guantanamo on average, would feel about that. I'm sure there would be some mixed feelings.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    2. Re:One good send deserves another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent idea. He would have the opportunity to learn what ACTUAL violence is like.

  39. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson is the crazy guy who's on a personal crusade against video games. He thinks those young whipersnappers will imitate them and go around stealing cars and shooting hookers, or jumping on turtles or something. Involved in lots of high profile cases (Grand Theft Auto ring any bells?) and has tried to have legislation pushed in several states to restrict sales of certain games. Rants on national TV, interviews with the press. Was the inspiration for this song. Has been covered on Slashdot multiple times. Involved in a legal skirmish with Penny Arcade, threatening to have them arrested because they donated to a charity in his name. Much, much, more.

    I'd link all that stuff to the relevant articles, but I'm feeling lazy today. I'll give you a head start, though.

  40. Good luck by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting the executive branch to respond to subpoenas. Congress tried to subpoena testimony from Karl Rove, and look how well that turned out for them.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:Good luck by taustin · · Score: 1

      He'll use it to claim he's been denied due process, because his subpoena wasn't honored, and demand everything be dropped as a result.

      He'll fail. But he's used to that by now.

  41. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Kamokazi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So user ID doesn't mean you know everything? Wow. (Admittedly mine is huge, but mostly because I've never botherd to make an account until recently...so I never judge based on UID).

    I'd say the majority (at least 80%) of Slashdot regulars know and despise Jack Thompson. It started with that trial, but he has been an annoying wart on the video game industry's toe ever since then, constantly proclaiming how video game violence is destroying society, etc. He has also been in a couple good squabbles with the guys that run Penny Arcade. And since you may not be in the 80%+ of regulars who know who they are, then I'll just sum it up by saying they are probably the most-read video game webcomic on the net, to the point that they have a pretty substantial video game expo every year.

    So perhaps if you'd checked Slashdot since you created your account, you might have known who this guy is and not made a fool of yourself. I will give you some credibility on the fact that this might deserve to be under video games instead of politics...but that's about it.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  42. Re:I've seen Thompson on Law and Order by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    Unfair! Fred Thompson might be an asshole too, if we only give him a chance.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  43. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1, Informative

    Thanks for the great response, the points you make are very good.

    But it was indeed "Slashdot: News for Nerds on the Stuff That Matters" at one point. If you look at this link from archive.org:

    http://web.archive.org/web/19980113191222/http://s lashdot.org/ ... which is the oldest slashdot.org link there (from Jan 13, 1998), you can see this. On my browser the logo at the top of the page is just a grey blob which I am sure was at one point a picture reading "Slashdot: News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters". If you look at the HTML source, you can see that the alt text for this image is the old slogan.

    The next oldest link that works from archive.org is from Nov. 11, 1998, and the logo and the alt text at that point had already been changed to "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters."

    My memory was wrong, I thought that the change happened in late 1999 or 2000 sometime, around the time that Slashdot's parent company (Andover.net) went public. I guess it was sometime in 1998 that the slogan was changed.

  44. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Ah, I saw the link in another post of yours. Well i'll be hog barreled, it was "News For Nerds on the Stuff that Matters" (and assuredly authentic due to the inappropriate and inconsistent capitalization).

    And no, damnit, you're not allowed to post your opinions! Get of meh internets!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  45. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by eln · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. I saw that page, but didn't see any slogan at all on it, so I skipped it. I didn't think to check the alt text for the image.

    I could argue that the alt text may have been a mistake, but given the text plus your memory, I guess I'll just say I stand corrected. I don't remember exactly how long I've been reading this site, but I'm fairly certain it was since at least 1997, and I couldn't remember the slogan ever being different, but then my memory for detail obviously isn't as good as yours.

  46. Perfect lesson in english usage by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone asked me the other day about the difference between psychotic and psychopathic. Here it is laid out nicely.

    The psychotic Jack Thompson is sending a subpoena to the psychopathic George Bush.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Perfect lesson in english usage by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      "The psychotic Jack Thompson is sending a subpoena to the psychopathic George Bush."

        Strange that when I read that, I was listening to Don Henley singing "you can't get the genie back in the bottle..."

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  47. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 0

    Well, it's not that my memory for detail is very good - it isn't - but for some reason at the time (in 1998 apparently) I did notice the change when it happened, I can't remember why, probably because there were so many changes going on to the site back then as it evolved into its current state, and I was very in tune with the site at the time and the direction it was taking. Remember that this used to be in big letters on the front page logo, so it was pretty easy to notice back then. You probably noticed it but long since forgot.

    And I've always referred back to that memory when I think about how Slashdot "isn't as good as it used to be", with the crappy editors (zonk and kdawson come to mind) posting stories that constantly make me wish I could break the habit of reading slashdot. So whereas I would normally forget such trivia, I remembered this because it's close to an issue that I care about (and honestly, I do care about the quality of Slashdot because I've been reading it for a long time, I've enjoyed it most of that time, and I don't want to see the quality of the site degrade any further).

    All that being said, I still think Slashdot is on balance worth reading, which is why I still read it. I gave up on it for a couple of months last year but I came back ...

  48. It's clear who Bush needs to defend him... by Runefox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Phoenix Wright, Ace Attorney!

    --
    Screw the rules, I have green hair!
    1. Re:It's clear who Bush needs to defend him... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

      OBJECTION!!!!

    2. Re:It's clear who Bush needs to defend him... by Phoenix+Wright · · Score: 1

      Leave me the hell out of this!

      --
      This is not legal advice.
  49. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by eln · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm with you on the editors (remember how kdawson would put almost everything into the Enlightenment category?), and the overall quality of the site over time. I pretty much agree with your other points as well.

    On another note, something that may only be funny to me:

    I was browsing your comment history briefly, and noticed that the VERY FIRST comment that Slashdot shows you having posted is from January 1999, and is complaining about the QUALITY OF AN ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT! That is just hilariously awesome.

    The comment.

  50. Boy, huh, wha? by solar_blitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, after reading this article I actually thought it was the first of April for a while. I kind of wish Jack Thompson sticks around, though. By the time he's caused enough chaos our legislative branch will finally push for more frivolous lawsuit and ethics reforms. He'd be the Bar Association's equivalent to Enron.

  51. Duck Hunt by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jack better watch out. Some of out government officials have already been trained on violent video games. I hear Cheney is pretty good at Duck Hunt.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Duck Hunt by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've heard he kinda sucks at it.

      Pro tip: get Cheney to invite Thompson on a game of Duck Hunt. Figures someone still gets hurt, even in the absence of live ammo.

    2. Re:Duck Hunt by Philotic · · Score: 1

      I hear Cheney is pretty good at Duck Hunt. It's actually *not* good to aim for the dog every time.
  52. department-of-cheap-shots by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Thompson is a raving nut. I think he needs to lower the stress in his life, do something to relax, like play video games. I've heard those are great for calming people down and making them act more rationally.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  53. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by mkiwi · · Score: 1
    As you can see from my user number, I've been around a while

    I'm not nearly as close to slashdot's inception as you are as I was Junior High school, but I can tell you, things have changed a lot... some of it for the worst.

    I don't think I would put the title of your post the way you did, but I definately agree with your points about content and slashdot. To not read your post and simply mod you as flamebait/troll/whatever evil is not right. However, there are a new generation of computer users with decidedly different views than more traditional slashdotters have. Some of these people are good, some of them will mod you -1 for disagreeing with your opinion.

    I believe that most people are good people who want their feelings to be felt and accounted for by their social groups. Not all posts have to have a light, fluffy, omg ponies slant to them. But that is the way of things today, as the new replace the old. Slashdot of long ago is dramatically different from Slashdot today. I remember when Zonk used to post Mac OS X updates as news and those would get feedback about features/bugs/fixes. I have not seen anything like this in many, many years.

    Maybe it is due to the world's political climate, the times we live in, or some economy driven thing. Either way, I speak my mind no matter what I'll be moderated. This is free society, speak your mind and give others the benefit of the doubt.

    That ends my philosophical rant.

    And for the record, there's probably a Dvorak or Cringley story that is just as bad as this story.

  54. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by nuzak · · Score: 1

    Despite my uid, I've been on slashdot since it was running on Taco's laptop. Truth is, the quality wasn't really any better then, but for it to not have improved at all is still a larger indictment now than it would be then.

    I've twice thrown out my identity on slashdot and gotten myself a new one. Once it was because I didn't like my old nick, once it's because I got disgusted and changed my email and password to random keyboard-banging strings. I actually did it to this one, but by some weird quirk, firefox remembered my password and kept me logged in. I might fix this one someday, but truth is, I don't much like this nick either, so I'll probably drop it too.

    I remember when Half-Empty started up -- I had high hopes for that. Alas, it probably just would have become Digg with extra icons... it eventually comes down to the people, I guess.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  55. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca... by Chas · · Score: 1

    Jack's one of the few who actually think a flashy Chewbacca Defense validates his position.

    Loony doesn't NEARLY do him justice.

    As to the topic.

    The only side ANYONE is ever on is THEIR OWN.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  56. Oh won't somebody give him... by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    ... a reason to sue IBM. Seriously, Microsoft, Judges, Bush... can't we please throw in the Nazgul for good measure?

  57. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by nuzak · · Score: 1

    > Jack Thompson is the crazy guy who's on a personal crusade against video games.

    And before that, it was gangsta rap. Remember 2 Live Crew? He's the one that led the charge against them. And before that, it was pornography. He got into some rather interesting exchanges with the then-AG of Florida, Janet Reno over that, while he was running for the same job. His big mouth killed his political aspirations then, and it doesn't look like he's learned now.

    He's always been a mean, vindictive, self-righteous foul-tempered loud-mouthed crank. Even his own son can't stand him, and has more than once made that publicly known.

    His subpoena to depose the Bushes (if it's even proper -- Jack is notorious for making deficient filings) is only to get their testimony in support of him, i.e. as a friendly witness. Apparently he's written letters to them (no sign that they were actually ever answered) and he thinks they'll come out and say what a great upstanding morally upright dude Jack is. Mmm hmm. Even construing this in a sane light, which is giving Whack Jack *way* too much latitude, it's a dilatory motion meant to confuse and slow proceedings, the Referee in his disciplinary proceedings (whom he has also filed suit against -- real smart Jack!) is going to see it for what it is, and lay the appropriate degree of smack down against it.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  58. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Xtravar · · Score: 1

    (WTF is up with the Politics section, for example) Well, when politicians started legislating our happy interweb world, us nerds needed a forum to respond. Not to mention, the world is becoming more integrated with "technology" everyday.

    YOU sir may only see the gaming aspect, but the rest of us see the government's encroachment on our civil rights through the use of and regarding to technology. The EFF is often lumped together with the ACLU for a reason.

      1. Internet censorship
      2. Big Brother use of technology
      3. Moral legislation
      4. Black-box voting

    Having a vested interest in certain political outcomes means we have a vested interest in politics in general, and that's why we can get away with a Politics section.
    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  59. Jack Thompson Sends Subpoena to Bush by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    "Lots of tards live really kick ass lives."

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
    1. Re:Jack Thompson Sends Subpoena to Bush by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Is he an airline pilot now, too?

  60. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    OMG. That is just TOO FUNNY. I can totally appreciate the irony of that given all of the pontificating I have done in this thread about how slashdot quality is going down.

    For what it's worth, I am sure I used to post before I had an ID, back when you just typed whatever nickname you wanted to show up next to your post, for every post. But, my posts back then probably weren't any more worthwhile than the drivel I have posted since.

    How do you tell what year comments or articles come from? Whenever I do a google search and end up on a Slashdot article, or go back and read old articles or comments, I can never tell what year they are from. Neither the page nor the URL contain anything that I can identify as the year. How do you tell?

  61. End of Credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a friend who is bipolar and paranoid schizophrenic. Every so often (6 months or so), he would go into his manic phase, decide that he didn't need to be on his medication, and stop taking it. The no-longer-controlled psychosis would inevitably emerge, and he'd do batshiat crazy things like trying to go to Scotland to get Excalibur from Lady of the Lake.

    One time, when he was in court for calling 911 for fires that didn't exist, the judge asked him, "Is there anybody you'd like to call in your defense?" My friend stood up to say that he wanted to call "The President of the United States" and "The King of England" (the fact that England doesn't have a king wasn't really an important factor in his reasoning process). My friend's mother was elated; this was the best possible answer my friend could have given to demonstrate (beyond a shadow of a doubt), to the court, that he was indeed a few cans short of a six pack, (i.e. totally batshiat crazy).

    I think Jack Thompson has aptly demonstrated exactly the same thing. His opinion is only worth a shot of Thorazine and a little time in the quiet room with the Mr. Friendly Hugs jacket.

    1. Re:End of Credibility by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      My friend stood up to say that he wanted to call "The President of the United States" and "The King of England" (the fact that England doesn't have a king wasn't really an important factor in his reasoning process).

      Maybe that was a cunning trick. If the King of England is required to appear at the trial, then the trial cannot fairly proceed until His Majesty turns up. Which means that the whole proceeding has to wait until there is a king of England. Given the fact that the Queen Mother only died a couple of years ago, and lived to over a hundred, that might be a long wait.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  62. It makes me wonder, though by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It makes me wonder, though. Schizophrenia quite often starts mild, debatably sane, and progresses over time to padded-room calibre. Just because at some point you might look like just a bit eccentric or slightly bizarre or a bit of a bad case of cognitive dissonance, doesn't mean that 17 years later you can't be diagnosed with proper schizophrenia.

    And this guy's delusions started from half-way between mildly annoying and mildly funny, and progressed to outright bizarre. I can't diagnose him anyway, but it makes me, you know, wonder. Maybe a second examination would find it a bit worse than the one almost 2 decades ago? It's a possibility.

    Plus, to the best of my knowledge, a lot (most?) doctors tend to prefer to err on the conservative side, especially when it would bury someone's career. If slapping a "yup, he's schizophrenic" label on him would terminate his right to act as a lawyer, even temporarily, they'll give him a lot of benefit of the doubt. He'd pretty much have to be at the raving lunatic stage to get that. It's just a different standard. Even if you'd consider giving him neuroleptics in a private consultation, you'd have to be convinced that he's to deranged to do his job to actually slap that on his dossier.

    Plus, in that kind of context, I figure it's hard to diagnose anyway. Noone will start telling you about the voices in his head, when he's sent there to determine whether he's fit to keep working and doing his crusade. Being insane carries a major stigma. So unless they're deranged past the point of hiding it, a lot of people _will_ try to hide it, if you just send them to a psychiatrist. They might admit stuff to their therapist if it was their idea to go there, and it's going to be kept secret. But not to the guy who has to determine whether they're fit to keep their job, and whose conclusion will probably be public record.

    What I'm trying to say is that it's entirely possible that he just slipped through the cracks the first time. (_If_ he's indeed nuts.) There's no telling if he'd still pass after all this time.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  63. I, for one... by Tarmas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for once, welcome our Jack Thompson overlord.

    --
    Signature has left the building.
  64. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by chuck · · Score: 1

    I haven't been around quite as long as you have, but I don't recall the slogan ever being "News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters". That may have been the original intent, but I don't think that was ever the actual slogan.


    Not addressing the point that you have a silly argument, but anyway... It's the slogan RIGHT F'N NOW, and has been since the beginning of slashdot. Seriously. Go to http://slashdot.org/ right now. It's the slogan. It's in the banner. It's in the HTML title. What's wrong with you??
  65. OH FFS! by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Won't someone please give Jack Thompson a clue?

    He's pleading for his license to practice law.

    He thinks the president is going to give him a helping hand for "furthering" the agenda?

    It doesn't work that way.

    Jack Thompson, you are a lowlife scumbag.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  66. Objection! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should print up some "Objection!" t-shirts and stand outside the courthouse that day :-)

  67. Bush will enjoy this by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I think what's needed after the disbarment is a 30 day psychiatric review in a closed facility. Might I suggest a closed facility on a nice tropical island; say, Cuba?
  68. Jack Thompson, dead at 57 by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived

    I just heard some great news on the radio - Jack Thompson, 57, was found dead in his Florida home this morning. There weren't any more details, but authorities think he was shot by a deranged, miserable wretch who wasn't allowed to play video games as a child. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will be happy to see the fucker burn in hell - even if you didn't enjoy his constant trolling of the legal system, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture by making GTA amazingly popular. Truly an American icon.

  69. And Jack Thompson needs by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Attorney Lionel Hutz!

    Mr. Thompson, you're in luck. Your suit against the President is just the thing I need to rebuild my shattered practice! Care to join me in a belt of scotch?

  70. sound of joke flying over your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whooooooooosh

  71. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    "," is short form for "on the" ?

  72. No excuse for torture. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's no excuse for one human being to torture another. There's no reason to joke about it, either. Jack should be stripped of his ability to practice law in the United States, but being an obnoxious and pedantic lawyer isn't a reason to deprive him of his basic human rights and inflict pain on him. In fact, there's no reason why torture should be acceptable in the 21st century world.

    Human Rights Watch

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:No excuse for torture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grow up and stop being such a fucking chode, dude.

    2. Re:No excuse for torture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no excuse for one human being to torture another. There's no reason to joke about it, either.

      Your first point is true, your second is not. We laugh so we don't cry.

    3. Re:No excuse for torture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stfu and gtfo, stupid hippie, part of the bong water brigade

  73. Of course when sending a subpeona to someone... by wilgibson · · Score: 1

    there is one major question that must be asked. I believe Peter Potamus said it best: "Did you get that thing I sent you?"

  74. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

    Thanks Bryan you're last few post's and window into the past have been more interesting than a lot of this weeks news :)
    (I too started very occasionally browsing /. around 1999 but didn't sign up until somewhere around 2005 or maybe later)

    Anyway, to answer your question immediately under each story or comment title it states :

    'by (user id) on (day month year) @ (time) (#comment id)'

  75. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by XenoPhage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    was allegedly under the influence of Grand Theft Auto

    Whoa.. I've heard of people smoking some crazy stuff, but a video game? How the hell do you smoke that? You can burn the cd, but then you're smokin the cd.. burn the computer? How the hell do you burn a series of 1s and 0s? And how do said binary digits "influence" you?

    --
    XenoPhage
    Technological Musings
  76. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by eln · · Score: 1

    As a subscriber, you can see posts all the way back as far as they have them. I just clicked on your name, and went back to the beginning. You may need to set the date to show the year in your preferences, though.

  77. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by thaylin · · Score: 1

    The point he was making and where you are incorrect on is that the slogan, at least since nov 1998 as has been pointed out, is "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters" not "News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters".

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  78. reminds me of an email that went out by geekoid · · Score: 1

    in a company I was at:

    "Please contact me if you don't get this message."

    Seriously. Yes, the guy was an idiot. I could go on with some of the winner statements this guy had said.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  79. I sent a Subpoena to Bush by geekoid · · Score: 1

    , but she still said no.

    ba-da-bing!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. Troll? by gaijin99 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The parent comment is comedy gold! What twit modded it troll?

    --
    "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
  81. This is taking too damn long ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    can't we just have him committed? Please?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  82. Re:Liberals control the justice system by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    Hey Jack,

    Aren't you a little too busy to be posting on slashdot right now?

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  83. Gamepolitics by Hemogoblin · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want the original story, check out the Gamepolitics article The submitted link is practically word for word plagiarism of the gp article. At the end of the submitted link, they state "thanks gamepolitics", but that hardly makes up for ripping off the article.

    In summary, if you want well written and interestering articles on politics and games with no advertisements, check out Gamepolitics.com. I'm not affiliated with the site in any way, I'm just a fan.

    Cheers

  84. Offtopic, but I had to post it by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting


      From the link you gave to the oldest slashdot page:

      Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... "

      I don't know what's scarier, the echoes from the past, or the echoes from the present ;-)

    SB

      (remembering with fondness my first 5MB IBM PC drive)

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    1. Re:Offtopic, but I had to post it by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Reminder to self, , not :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  85. Here is Jack Thompson's defense by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    George W. Bush was playing Civilization II when he got the idea to invade Iraq for the Oil and resources and gain a lot of gold. So Jack Thompson wants George W. Bush to testify under oath that he did play Civilization II on his PC before or after he held office. Jack Thompson will claim that this is the way the Civilization II game is played, to invade other nations for the gold.

    He might as well subpoena Bill Gates, and accuse him of playing the Monopoly video game for DOS or the Apple //, before deciding to bundle MS-Office, Internet Explorer, and Media Player with Windows installed on each new PC sold by PC Vendors. The object in the Monopoly video game, claims Jack Thompson, is to own property and bundle them together to lock out competitors and raise the prices in order to become the richest person in the game.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Here is Jack Thompson's defense by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, I hope he never gets his hands on Alpha Centauri then...

      If you never want to sleep well again, imagine what Redneck Nero and his All-Republican Roadshow could pull off with "Nerve Stapling..."

  86. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by chuck · · Score: 1

    Oopsie, I guess I'm not enough of a pedantic prick to notice that completely pointless distinction.

  87. Classic Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    They're just trying to avoid a classic blunder: forgetting Poland.

    1. Re:Classic Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inconceivable.

  88. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been reading this site since Rob learned Perl and moved from Chips and Dips to this site, and I think Bob has suffered a stroke or something. Not to mention the content of this site has always been rather vapid. There was a lot of banter about software releases and anime, then later came Katz, and well let's just be blunt: Slashdot is not a site for intellectuals of any caliber and never has been. It's a link magnet for men.

  89. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by jackbird · · Score: 1
    What, the distinction between English and Engrish?

    "News for Nerds on the stuff that matters" sounds like it came from the packaging of a very cheap thumbdrive.

  90. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Kandenshi · · Score: 1

    And how do said binary digits "influence" you? Trust me, 1s and 0s can have a great influence on your life. Goatse, Tubgirl, Lemonparty, etc... they're just 1s and 0s, but they can influence you. They can shatter a man's soul. Or make a /b/tard really happy I suppose.
  91. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by grendel03 · · Score: 1

    Just roll it into a fatty and light it up.

  92. There goes the neighborhood! by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

    Ol' Jack-o wack-o is nuttier than squirrel poop. If he we'rn REALLY smart, he would have subpoena'd Miss South Carolina as a character witness. THAT would be a nifty.

  93. Re:Slashdot jumps the shark by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Does Fred Thompson have fuckall to do with this? No.

    Lay off the crackpipe, AC. If you're not going to RTFA, or even RTFS, at least read the fucking HEADLINE.

  94. Attention Whore by kjs3 · · Score: 1

    Yet another pathetic attempt to be an attention whore. He knows (or, should know if he's competent), that he can't do this. The sitting President enjoys immunity from civil liability. See Jones v. Clinton.

  95. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    The problem with ACs is you can't track them down and make them pay for your new keyboard.

  96. Or maybe by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Harvey Birdman: I'll take the case!

  97. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that - actually it turns out that it's a preference in the "homepage" preferences section. I've gone looking for it in the past, in the "comments" preferences section, where I thought it would logically be, but having not found it there, gave up.

  98. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the pointer, since you said that it was possible to get the date/time like that I did a more exhaustive search of the user preferences. Turns out it's a setting in the "homepage" section, not the "comments" section, and I didn't find it before. Now I'm golden. Thanks again!

  99. Re:Liberals control the justice system by Alsee · · Score: 1

    kicking out the democrats and their valued pedophile constituents

    Huh? Since when are Republican legislators the Democrat's constituents?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  100. No, IAWTPA by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    I Am With The Penny Arcade; Thompson serves a useful purpose. Whenever the media need a quote about the latest case of a sociopath going disco 'because' he played Pong as a child, they go straight to Jack and get an absolutely barking mad, howling at the moon tirade that no sane person would take seriously. If Jack vanished from the public eye, then he might be replaced with someone actually credible.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:No, IAWTPA by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What's worrysome is that a loonie like him is already been taken serious, considering the laws passed (and promptly knocked out) against games.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  101. Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I just wish the cowardly democrats would also suboena Bush for Lying USA into a WAR causing some 4000 US troops deaths.. !

  102. JUst to be fashionable... by justkeeper · · Score: 1

    I'll send Bush a DMCA takedown notice!

  103. MOD PARENT UP by hollowedOut · · Score: 1

    Anyone who pulls out Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law references deserves at least a 2.

  104. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no-one posts content anymore it is all about AGGREGATING (and adwords revenue)

  105. Re:Liberals control the justice system by Annie+Ominus · · Score: 1

    Wow! Did you just fix hate on Disney, Rockstar, hip hop and Democrats all in one email? And, hic. compare them with pedophiles??? i think i found jack thompson's nom de plume on slashdot, or are you Bush. Same difference, y'all are from the same gene pool are'nt you...Yours is definetely not my way, and possibly not many other folks either. So drop the royal "our" and keep it in your fancy pants cowboy.

  106. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by XenoPhage · · Score: 1

    Trust me, 1s and 0s can have a great influence on your life. Goatse, Tubgirl, Lemonparty, etc... they're just 1s and 0s, but they can influence you. They can shatter a man's soul. Or make a /b/tard really happy I suppose. Ah, I had not considered that aspect. Touché, good sir, touché....
    --
    XenoPhage
    Technological Musings
  107. Re:Liberals control the justice system by Azuma+Hazuki · · Score: 1

    > Huh? Since when are Republican legislators the Democrat's constituents?

    You're a loon if you don't think the two major parties are basically the same under the surface...

    --
    ~Eien no Inori wo Sasagete~ Searching for my Hatsumi...
  108. Let him keep his license by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

    If Thompson disappears, it will be a sad day for gamers. Why? Because someone new will certainly come along to fight against video games. That new person might actually be reasonably intelligent and charismatic. That would be bad.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  109. Re:I've seen Thompson on Law and Order by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

    Please do, as we certainly don't want the executive and legislative branches to both be controlled by one party.

    At least, that's what I heard while the Republicans were controlling congress....

    --
    Here's your sig.