Um you don't figure where the light is. you tweak the quality of the transmission. when you have very little interference, you've reached your target velocity. So it may actually require sending a test packet checking the results (all test packets are identical so we already know what the receiver should see). now if you can make this doubling of still faster than the state of the art congratulations.
How can we implement a test that all technological measures and DMCA arguments (an argument is a protective measure IMHO) must pass or qualify so that no indirect protection is granted?
Perhaps look up a giant thesaurus for a phrase more precise than "access control measure". Privilege control measure?
Companies do not have a right to protect that which is not protected by copyright, patent, nor trademark law.
They do this blindly, illegally, and without due process (even the due process provided by the DMCA however little it is).
Blindly: Digital Convergence claimed the DMCA was violated when someone wrote a linux driver for their CueCat Barcode reader.
Illegal patent-like protection (because they never filed for the patent): Lexmark protects the software necessary to allow you to use a different toner cartridge.
Without counter notification: ISPs closing down sites out of fear of retribution.
Maybe bandwidth carriers (the folks who provide the pipe and own several ISPs) should be exempt as opposed to service carriers (the folks who pump the spam, ads, and hosting) who deserve maybe less protection. Think of the difference between the people who own the land (bandwidth carries), the people who put up a mall(ISP) on the land, the people who put up a store in the mall(specific webmaster), and the customers who use the store(ISP fee payers). Filing for the patent would require releasing the design of the software for others to see.
How can we implement a test that all technological measures and DMCA arguments (an argument is a protective measure IMHO) must pass or qualify so that no indirect protection is granted?
Perhaps look up a giant thesaurus for a phrase more precise than "access control measure". Privilege control measure?
Companies do not have a right to protect that which is not protected by copyright, patent, nor trademark law.
The sieve is irregular because there are few cases (though regularly) where a previously sifted number comes up to the chopping block. The leftover set looks like the result of subtracting incresing frequencies out of a waveform.
Now take into account that we are talking about factors.
This in ways only the Lord knows suggests looking at the pattern of gaps thusly:
General 1. Read the pattern of gaps beginning with every square integer.
2. Read the pattern of gaps beginning with every odd square.
I imagine you might find: 1. Repeating patterns 2. Repeating patterns increasing in length. 3. Rotated patterns 4. Patterns that repeat from a simple offset away from n^2
Or all that but with regard to n^2, (n+1)^2, (n+k)^2
Because the sieve is remove multiples of x beginning with 2x, I think prime numbers are not random but only seem that way because each step is out of sync, kind of like scrambled cable signals.
Some people believe that distributing needles to drug addicts reduces problems.
Maybe it isn't the copying that is the problem, much as the use of needles isn't the problem.
Needles are harmless. Drug addicts spread disease and crime. Copying is harmless, It's what you do afterward that may or may not be harmful.
And don't even go there...
Jack Valenti (MPAA) saith:
Why would you buy something you can acquire for free?
I saith: Why would you give away what you payed for? And since you are now paying, why would you not simply get it from the source, or are artists incapable of publishing songs on the net?
Better yet offer a $1 million dollar prize to the best seller of your product only require a $1/month fee to enter the contest. Prizes handed out yearly.
Imagine a water wheel used to generate electricity.
So...
The energy of the water moves the wheel, which then converts in any way you wish to electricity.
So then energy is in taken by the wheel and by the power line.
I think we tend to think friction is just an inconvenience but perhaps unless someone comes up with a system that has exactly one output for each input (only the power line) and no waste there will be no solution.
Imagine a water wheel used to generate electricity.
The energy of the water moves the wheel, which then converts in any way you wish to electricity.
So then energy is in taken by the wheel and by the power line.
I think we tend to think friction is just an inconvenience but perhaps unless someone comes up with a system that has exactly one output for each input (only the power line) and no waste there will be no solution.
The way the industry has been promoting DRM is with a bait and switch tactic. They tell the colleges that DRM can keep students honest. They tell companies that DRm can ensure that documents have not been tampered with. Then after everyone gets excited about DRM, they claim that companies and colleges support the use of DRMs like Palladium.
That's the issue at hand.
Whether it's illegal to copy something you bought, I couldn't give less of a damn. The fact that copyright is there as an incentive (not a privilege) to publish content and here we have content publishers extending the protection of ALREADY PUBLISHED WORKS seriously bothers me.Given that it is an incentive, the fervor with which the publishers whine about copying is rather arrogant. They are not entitled to special treatment as publishers only to a rather quite distorted incentive from what it was designed to do. When I see teachers turned away at Kinko's for trying to make 20 or 30 copies for students of 1 page from one workbook the rest of which is never used (I often see this) I fucking want to scream bloody murder.
Rosen and Co. say, "Why would anyone buy it if they could download it for free?"
I say why would anyone offer it for free if so many people want it?
Copyright came about when it cost more to print than to produce a work. No argument there. The cost of printing is pennies compared to what it was. Copyright allowed people to earn money without having a day job, and frankly I think that's absurd. People got used to freeloading off consumers. It's time they got a real job.
Mickey Mouse is almost 100 years old, Disney give it up already! It deserves to be dead and public domain by now.
This is just as bad as peer pressure to get into drugs.
It prioritizes mass harrassment over reason.It turns the conflict (much of it natural at a certain age) internally on a person with the added weight of others who are contemptible in choosing to subject others under such pressure because:
1. It is dishones; the "right to look your accuser in the face" is taken away. Anyone looking their accusers in the face will be shamed. Any honest (willing to accept convincing evidence) dialogue is silenced and utterly impossible.
2. It is authority by majority, no accountability of the accusers is taken.
3. It is pressure based on raging fears and mass hysteria. 'Nuff said.
The lack of competition means fewer companies with a clue to cluebat those without one.
AOL's stock is almost worthless. In a documentary about the Time-Warner and AOL merger it's reported that AOL will be swallowed up by the very company they tried to buy, Time-Warner.
What went wrong? Reality bites. They had the content, they had the subscribers, they didn't have the other three magic beans:
1. The content promotion and exclusivity 2. The pipe, technology, and geeks to make it possible 3. A shred of respectability left after being tainted by the spam-breeding, comsumer information selling, child abduction prone, technological dinosaur. They only NOW got email sorting feature! AOL SO R NOT INNOVATION!
The other reason we don't fortify our homes is because it's just plain nuts to do so.
Lwt's all just examine the final product of every arms race solution to every problem and fast forward to the end. Just tell me how to parallel park the tank on my side of the street.
Given the article I'm starting to think taking up caligraphy to embellish my penmanship and becoming an MD to completely obfuscate my writing might actually have some value.
Hire me as a public encryptor and then hire another caligraphic MD as the decryptor.
Slashdot Mirror
the odds?
Will the odd finally get even?
-rares
Um you don't figure where the light is. you tweak the quality of the transmission. when you have very little interference, you've reached your target velocity. So it may actually require sending a test packet checking the results (all test packets are identical so we already know what the receiver should see). now if you can make this doubling of still faster than the state of the art congratulations.
Umm, oxidation is not the same as evacuation of air.
Wouldn't the distance be too short then?
I have a right to defend myself with a sufficiently capable weapon.
Plain and simple.
>If only Ben Franklin were still around to help us out with thorny issues like this... *sigh*
Clone him until we can guarantee he has five fingers on each hand no more no less. If he comes out with or even three heads even better then.
How is answering the phone in broken english doing the job better?
How is someone who just started doing the job better than someone who got promoted twice?
How can we implement a test that all technological measures and DMCA arguments (an argument is a protective measure IMHO) must pass or qualify so that no indirect protection is granted?
Perhaps look up a giant thesaurus for a phrase more precise than "access control measure". Privilege control measure?
Companies do not have a right to protect that which is not protected by copyright, patent, nor trademark law.
They do this blindly, illegally, and without due process (even the due process provided by the DMCA however little it is).
Blindly:
Digital Convergence claimed the DMCA was violated when someone wrote a linux driver for their CueCat Barcode reader.
Illegal patent-like protection (because they never filed for the patent):
Lexmark protects the software necessary to allow you to use a different toner cartridge.
Without counter notification:
ISPs closing down sites out of fear of retribution.
Maybe bandwidth carriers (the folks who provide the pipe and own several ISPs) should be exempt as opposed to service carriers (the folks who pump the spam, ads, and hosting) who deserve maybe less protection. Think of the difference between the people who own the land (bandwidth carries), the people who put up a mall(ISP) on the land, the people who put up a store in the mall(specific webmaster), and the customers who use the store(ISP fee payers).
Filing for the patent would require releasing the design of the software for others to see.
How can we implement a test that all technological measures and DMCA arguments (an argument is a protective measure IMHO) must pass or qualify so that no indirect protection is granted?
Perhaps look up a giant thesaurus for a phrase more precise than "access control measure". Privilege control measure?
Companies do not have a right to protect that which is not protected by copyright, patent, nor trademark law.
I tend to look at primes like this:
The sieve is irregular because there are few cases (though regularly) where a previously sifted number comes up to the chopping block. The leftover set looks like the result of subtracting incresing frequencies out of a waveform.
Now take into account that we are talking about factors.
This in ways only the Lord knows suggests looking at the pattern of gaps thusly:
General
1. Read the pattern of gaps beginning with every square integer.
2. Read the pattern of gaps beginning with every odd square.
Variation: Dependent on n^2
1. Read n^2 + 2, n^2 + 4, skip 2n.
I imagine you might find:
1. Repeating patterns
2. Repeating patterns increasing in length.
3. Rotated patterns
4. Patterns that repeat from a simple offset away from n^2
Or all that but with regard to n^2, (n+1)^2, (n+k)^2
Because the sieve is remove multiples of x beginning with 2x, I think prime numbers are not random but only seem that way because each step is out of sync, kind of like scrambled cable signals.
Some people believe that distributing needles to drug addicts reduces problems.
Maybe it isn't the copying that is the problem, much as the use of needles isn't the problem.
Needles are harmless. Drug addicts spread disease and crime. Copying is harmless, It's what you do afterward that may or may not be harmful.
And don't even go there...
Jack Valenti (MPAA) saith:
Why would you buy something you can acquire for free?
I saith:
Why would you give away what you payed for? And since you are now paying, why would you not simply get it from the source, or are artists incapable of publishing songs on the net?
Better yet offer a $1 million dollar prize to the best seller of your product only require a $1/month fee to enter the contest. Prizes handed out yearly.
Imagine a water wheel used to generate electricity.
So...
The energy of the water moves the wheel, which then converts in any way you wish to electricity.
So then energy is in taken by the wheel and by the power line.
I think we tend to think friction is just an inconvenience but perhaps unless someone comes up with a system that has exactly one output for each input (only the power line) and no waste there will be no solution.
Imagine a water wheel used to generate electricity.
The energy of the water moves the wheel, which then converts in any way you wish to electricity.
So then energy is in taken by the wheel and by the power line.
I think we tend to think friction is just an inconvenience but perhaps unless someone comes up with a system that has exactly one output for each input (only the power line) and no waste there will be no solution.
Fuzzy logic could make it easier.
Like ever go up to traffic lights on a 2 or 3 or more lane road?
I can tell those lights apart just fine.
What is difficult here is that radio waves are damn hard to pinpoint where they come from since they go in all directions.
But so does light doesn't it?
Man this gives me an idea.
The way the industry has been promoting DRM is with a bait and switch tactic. They tell the colleges that DRM can keep students honest. They tell companies that DRm can ensure that documents have not been tampered with. Then after everyone gets excited about DRM, they claim that companies and colleges support the use of DRMs like Palladium.
That's the issue at hand.
Whether it's illegal to copy something you bought, I couldn't give less of a damn. The fact that copyright is there as an incentive (not a privilege) to publish content and here we have content publishers extending the protection of ALREADY PUBLISHED WORKS seriously bothers me.Given that it is an incentive, the fervor with which the publishers whine about copying is rather arrogant. They are not entitled to special treatment as publishers only to a rather quite distorted incentive from what it was designed to do. When I see teachers turned away at Kinko's for trying to make 20 or 30 copies for students of 1 page from one workbook the rest of which is never used (I often see this) I fucking want to scream bloody murder.
Rosen and Co. say, "Why would anyone buy it if they could download it for free?"
I say why would anyone offer it for free if so many people want it?
Copyright came about when it cost more to print than to produce a work. No argument there. The cost of printing is pennies compared to what it was. Copyright allowed people to earn money without having a day job, and frankly I think that's absurd. People got used to freeloading off consumers. It's time they got a real job.
Mickey Mouse is almost 100 years old, Disney give it up already! It deserves to be dead and public domain by now.
This is just as bad as peer pressure to get into drugs.
It prioritizes mass harrassment over reason.It turns the conflict (much of it natural at a certain age) internally on a person with the added weight of others who are contemptible in choosing to subject others under such pressure because:
1. It is dishones; the "right to look your accuser in the face" is taken away. Anyone looking their accusers in the face will be shamed. Any honest (willing to accept convincing evidence) dialogue is silenced and utterly impossible.
2. It is authority by majority, no accountability of the accusers is taken.
3. It is pressure based on raging fears and mass hysteria. 'Nuff said.
Welcome to Salem, MA 1692.
There I said it!
I hate Slashdot.
I I hate Slashdot.
hate SlaI hate Slashdot.
shdot.I hate Slashdot.
I hateII hI hate Slashdot.I hate Slashdot.
ate SlashdI hate SlaI hate Slashdot.
shdot.
ot.I hate Slashdot.
hate Slashdot.
I hate SlashdI hate Slashdot.
ot.
Slashdot.I hate Slashdot.
You know you're right. I think it's about time for them flying cars don't you?
See that's where your argument falls apart.
The lack of competition means fewer companies with a clue to cluebat those without one.
AOL's stock is almost worthless. In a documentary about the Time-Warner and AOL merger it's reported that AOL will be swallowed up by the very company they tried to buy, Time-Warner.
What went wrong? Reality bites. They had the content, they had the subscribers, they didn't have the other three magic beans:
1. The content promotion and exclusivity
2. The pipe, technology, and geeks to make it possible
3. A shred of respectability left after being tainted by the spam-breeding, comsumer information selling, child abduction prone, technological dinosaur. They only NOW got email sorting feature! AOL SO R NOT INNOVATION!
TWOL anyone?
No airline = no business meetings
No business meetings = no companies like hotels
No hotels = Where do I sleep when DEFCON comes around?
Mission I: Get approval of caffeinated chewing gum project (based on 60 Minutes before their laughing stock show split in two and ratings plunged).
Other titles:
Friendly Fire I: I Regret That I Have Only One Lif... Thud!
Friendly Fire II: No Such Disease
and My Favorite!
Electoral College Arena: Capture The Flag
Weapon of Mass Eavesdropping. Everything you want during high school is dangerous!
The other reason we don't fortify our homes is because it's just plain nuts to do so.
Lwt's all just examine the final product of every arms race solution to every problem and fast forward to the end. Just tell me how to parallel park the tank on my side of the street.
Sure, if we just listen to EVERYONE's conversations we'll find soemthing interesting.
We pay these people money? and let them operate heavy computing machinery? did they get their pubes yet?
Dr. Egon Spengler: Print is dead
Given the article I'm starting to think taking up caligraphy to embellish my penmanship and becoming an MD to completely obfuscate my writing might actually have some value.
Hire me as a public encryptor and then hire another caligraphic MD as the decryptor.
Quantum encryption? HAH!