/paraphrase
No one can stop you from creating artwork.
/paraphrase
My ass.
I want to write and direct artworks. I want to support fans of my work who want to translate it.
If the media hardware is made by publishers, I'm going to get raped by the pricing of recording hardware, which would make it impossible for me to concentrate on projects where need to express superceeds the need to make a killing. Both me and my fans, who could do better at advertising my work than anyone else, will get fucked over by the blacklists and all the rest of the paranoid psychosis that seems to have bewitched publishers.
I have no problem with artists designing hardware. However, publishers are in a position to fuck everyone on both sides, consumers and artists.
I'm forced to sacrifice opportunities because a bunch of publishers can't get their heads out of their asses to use the net rather than screw it.
Is LAME catching up to mp3pro or is mp3pro catching up to Ogg and Advanced Audio Coding?
Simple solution:
1. Use Wine.
2. Create better codecs.
3. Port to native Windows/BeOS/MacOS/Amiga
a. This easier than it might seem
b. 1.5x the work of the original for
5x the value
c. Gives competitors who like to do as
little as possible something to worry
about.
4. Keep the competition busy.
If students have access to it we get salvation. If only the military gets access we get war.
Teach students science that's current.
Somehow I think there's an easier way but only
on
The Quest For Fusion
·
· Score: 1
the most ignorant and obnoxious corporate interest is allowed to learn about it.
Don't get me wrong. Corporate interest is fine. It's just that the morons who seem to hate any sort of profitmaking and the morons who piss them off have committed the perfect murder of progress and ingenuity. We'll just call the former morons for now and the latter are none other than your favorite Ayn Rand Club "meme"bers who couldn't even quote Ayn Rand to save their necks. For the slow, I love Ayn rand dearly... I hate her followers with a passion.
See it works like this:
1. Morons have made a devil in the image of what they hate. It's really just a collage of factories, smokestacks, jargon filled voice overs, and all sorts of other stereotypes.
2. Then they've created a culture, infectious one at that, that associates science and profit with the above devil.
3. That notion, especially the bit about difficult work, expensive projects, and technologies generally inaccessible to the public, has spread.
4. It has poisoned another culture (the Ayn Rand Clubs) with all sorts of ideas about corporate organization charts etc., the perfect blueprint for the 20th Century Corporation, the one whose fall Ayn Rand describes as being caused by to much dependence on trademarks, looks, and unearned pride.
5. The New Ayn Rand Clubs irritate the morons and vice-versa further entrenching their notions of good and evil into the general public's mind.
The result:
Any ingenuity and clever design is overlooked and ignored over clunky expensive overly developed hardware. Why? Cuz you know... the bigger it is the better, the more expensive the more serious the work, you know it's working because it makes more noise, etc.
And to top it off, even though a significant number of people had a computer at an early age and the first thing they did was program, computer design and programming and related technologies are considered Masters or Phd topics. Go figure.
Expect the best ideas to be ignored for at least another quarter century until we are about 50 years old and our revenge against those 50 years old in 2001 will be completed. For the slow, that means we'll have our own kids while the current day morons are scrounging for social security. Social security hopefully will have been cancelled so we can give our children the future we had briefly. The one which these morons came in and destroyed through all their moaning and groaning. Oh and a great big thank you to the Clinton family for suggesting NASA's budget should be increased.
Incidentally the reason the sound theme in most complete Windows based systems clicks when you click the mouse (in addition to the clearly audible click of the mouse button itself) is because Bill Gates is a genius! I hate his software because of the design philosophy and constant astral transcendence I have to achieve to get results from it. But mark my word, the guy knows his market. Morons need to know they clicked when they clicked. Sadly I think some who didn't hear it the first time (the mouse button), refuse to acknowledge the second click (the sound theme) and continue to miss out on the benefits Bill Gates had intended for them. Nice try Bill.
So what am I getting at? Simply this: If we weren't all gawking at all the shiny chrome on our so-called marvelous inventions we might come up with something truly useful and accessible to anyone willing to study it.
Um selling a copy and selling a copy you paid for are completely different animals. All attempts to crossbreed will either end in failure or the Second Coming.
I loved my old car really. She was schweet. I didn't sell it. I went to college. But I have such fond memories I should probably still be paying insurance in case I dream about hitting someone. You know things like that happen. Especially gotta talk about that spot 3.5 meters from a spot that's.125 inches from the tip of the door handle. I dropped a bit of ice cream there. Heck I could sit in a canoe and completely convince myself I'm in the car.
The artist already got paid when the book was first purchased. Same with the car I no longer have. Why should I still be bound to it?
Unless you want to argue that people have photographic memory, please try harder next time.
And don't push it. People remember plots using mental cues that come from everyday life as well as what they read. Does the author own those as well? Goddamned prideless greedy... well nevermind.
When the trucker that delivered those books gets paid should the author get paid TWICE again considering HE/SHE/IT (author) got paid when the books were purchased from the publisher's warehouse.
You're not paying for the OS silly. Retailers have agreements about that. You are paying in terms of choices. Things like no dual boot options on machines with the "free" Windows".
Exactly what right do they have to shut people up? Where is that a right?
There is no right to looking good in the eye of your beholders. Sorry. Check out China.gov or something to that effect. It has a capitalist economy I'll give it credit for that, but it's still a communist, repressive government, mostly because of convenience.
Photogenics has an unlimited undo system
on
Gimp 1.2.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
One version is even GPLed.
Now seeing as gtk became a standard lib and Photogenics' author Paul Nolan is working on the GUI for the new Amiga I wonder what what you just said could do for system design.
If you don't have X's keys then you tell Y keys info and you never need X's keys cuz Y thinks you're X.
It's easily fixed just need a different approach.
I have one. It's slightly clumsy but I do have one.
Coming soon... Hint: session keys (only the computer knows them)... and multitude of ambiguities caused by things like fixed length verification exchanges even though your algo is simple. There is only one case when the keys can be discovered by backtracking, that's when the keys are discarded anyway.
It's kinda like Diffie-Hellman but MITM proof.
The only thing I can imagine is someone recording random sessions a la SETI and then trying to find when key rejections occurred and then testing a long list of possibilities.
Slashdot Mirror
How about a private person keeping them?
You really must think every company is just having a great time.
/paraphrase
No one can stop you from creating artwork.
/paraphrase
My ass.
I want to write and direct artworks. I want to support fans of my work who want to translate it.
If the media hardware is made by publishers, I'm going to get raped by the pricing of recording hardware, which would make it impossible for me to concentrate on projects where need to express superceeds the need to make a killing. Both me and my fans, who could do better at advertising my work than anyone else, will get fucked over by the blacklists and all the rest of the paranoid psychosis that seems to have bewitched publishers.
I have no problem with artists designing hardware. However, publishers are in a position to fuck everyone on both sides, consumers and artists.
I'm forced to sacrifice opportunities because a bunch of publishers can't get their heads out of their asses to use the net rather than screw it.
Is LAME catching up to mp3pro or is mp3pro catching up to Ogg and Advanced Audio Coding?
Simple solution:
1. Use Wine.
2. Create better codecs.
3. Port to native Windows/BeOS/MacOS/Amiga
a. This easier than it might seem
b. 1.5x the work of the original for
5x the value
c. Gives competitors who like to do as
little as possible something to worry
about.
4. Keep the competition busy.
It's also easy to further lock down - it's straightforward to block any TCP or UDP port or even protocol you choose (without additional software).
What took them so long? There's no bloody difference between filling out a form and commenting lines in inetd.conf as well as firewall config files.
Frankly unsecured boxes should be tagged as tools for aiding and abetting crackers.
By the way, "bent-up security 'focus'"...
What your fingers are going to fall off typing a login/password pair?
Mrs. Hacker:Please keep John Q away from temptation.
Sprint: Will do Mrs. Hacker.
In any case..., before you whiners whine about people posting this story, look at what persistence is doing for the religious right.
Does it run AmigaOS?
Of = belonging/liable to
By = designed/chosen by
For = instead of/in the wishes of
I fail to see where you're confused.
God has no need for such vanities as patents. Thank God for God.
Wish I knew. I have a copy some place. I might OCR it one day while standing over her grave. Just as a sentimental gesture you know.
Internet offers free stuff, Fusion offers infinite energy resources, tawk amongst yourselves.
I'd add more but I really don't know what will happen afterwards.
If students have access to it we get salvation. If only the military gets access we get war.
Teach students science that's current.
the most ignorant and obnoxious corporate interest is allowed to learn about it.
Don't get me wrong. Corporate interest is fine. It's just that the morons who seem to hate any sort of profitmaking and the morons who piss them off have committed the perfect murder of progress and ingenuity. We'll just call the former morons for now and the latter are none other than your favorite Ayn Rand Club "meme"bers who couldn't even quote Ayn Rand to save their necks. For the slow, I love Ayn rand dearly... I hate her followers with a passion.
See it works like this:
1. Morons have made a devil in the image of what they hate. It's really just a collage of factories, smokestacks, jargon filled voice overs, and all sorts of other stereotypes.
2. Then they've created a culture, infectious one at that, that associates science and profit with the above devil.
3. That notion, especially the bit about difficult work, expensive projects, and technologies generally inaccessible to the public, has spread.
4. It has poisoned another culture (the Ayn Rand Clubs) with all sorts of ideas about corporate organization charts etc., the perfect blueprint for the 20th Century Corporation, the one whose fall Ayn Rand describes as being caused by to much dependence on trademarks, looks, and unearned pride.
5. The New Ayn Rand Clubs irritate the morons and vice-versa further entrenching their notions of good and evil into the general public's mind.
The result:
Any ingenuity and clever design is overlooked and ignored over clunky expensive overly developed hardware. Why? Cuz you know... the bigger it is the better, the more expensive the more serious the work, you know it's working because it makes more noise, etc.
And to top it off, even though a significant number of people had a computer at an early age and the first thing they did was program, computer design and programming and related technologies are considered Masters or Phd topics. Go figure.
Expect the best ideas to be ignored for at least another quarter century until we are about 50 years old and our revenge against those 50 years old in 2001 will be completed. For the slow, that means we'll have our own kids while the current day morons are scrounging for social security. Social security hopefully will have been cancelled so we can give our children the future we had briefly. The one which these morons came in and destroyed through all their moaning and groaning. Oh and a great big thank you to the Clinton family for suggesting NASA's budget should be increased.
Incidentally the reason the sound theme in most complete Windows based systems clicks when you click the mouse (in addition to the clearly audible click of the mouse button itself) is because Bill Gates is a genius! I hate his software because of the design philosophy and constant astral transcendence I have to achieve to get results from it. But mark my word, the guy knows his market. Morons need to know they clicked when they clicked. Sadly I think some who didn't hear it the first time (the mouse button), refuse to acknowledge the second click (the sound theme) and continue to miss out on the benefits Bill Gates had intended for them. Nice try Bill.
So what am I getting at? Simply this: If we weren't all gawking at all the shiny chrome on our so-called marvelous inventions we might come up with something truly useful and accessible to anyone willing to study it.
/end rant
Maybe that's cuz there's no pr0n on the net anymore. Just pr0n used to advertise pr0n that doesn't exist.
They are for real... very real.
Um selling a copy and selling a copy you paid for are completely different animals. All attempts to crossbreed will either end in failure or the Second Coming.
I assure there are no living faggots in Kansas. Lord don't like that ya know.
Yeah but JD Salinger isn't fighting to extend to copyright rules.
I loved my old car really. She was schweet. I didn't sell it. I went to college. But I have such fond memories I should probably still be paying insurance in case I dream about hitting someone. You know things like that happen. Especially gotta talk about that spot 3.5 meters from a spot that's .125 inches from the tip of the door handle. I dropped a bit of ice cream there. Heck I could sit in a canoe and completely convince myself I'm in the car.
The artist already got paid when the book was first purchased. Same with the car I no longer have. Why should I still be bound to it?
Unless you want to argue that people have photographic memory, please try harder next time.
And don't push it. People remember plots using mental cues that come from everyday life as well as what they read. Does the author own those as well? Goddamned prideless greedy... well nevermind.
When the trucker that delivered those books gets paid should the author get paid TWICE again considering HE/SHE/IT (author) got paid when the books were purchased from the publisher's warehouse.
Is that like fast forwarding through commercials while taping?
God the doubletalk:noise:signal is high today about 1 googol:2:1
You're not paying for the OS silly. Retailers have agreements about that. You are paying in terms of choices. Things like no dual boot options on machines with the "free" Windows".
Right to pursue? Where?
Exactly what right do they have to shut people up? Where is that a right?
There is no right to looking good in the eye of your beholders. Sorry. Check out China.gov or something to that effect. It has a capitalist economy I'll give it credit for that, but it's still a communist, repressive government, mostly because of convenience.
One version is even GPLed.
Now seeing as gtk became a standard lib and Photogenics' author Paul Nolan is working on the GUI for the new Amiga I wonder what what you just said could do for system design.
If you don't have X's keys then you tell Y keys info and you never need X's keys cuz Y thinks you're X.
It's easily fixed just need a different approach.
I have one. It's slightly clumsy but I do have one.
Coming soon... Hint: session keys (only the computer knows them)... and multitude of ambiguities caused by things like fixed length verification exchanges even though your algo is simple. There is only one case when the keys can be discovered by backtracking, that's when the keys are discarded anyway.
It's kinda like Diffie-Hellman but MITM proof.
The only thing I can imagine is someone recording random sessions a la SETI and then trying to find when key rejections occurred and then testing a long list of possibilities.