Pencil and paper. I had this issue in both my math and chemistry classes. It was defiantly worth it to just do it on paper and then translate them into teX later.
REST also doesn't allow sessions. The only way to do auth in rest is via HTTP, and that's shittily implemented in browsers (ugly, no way to log out, no way to log in from any page). Cookies are fine. I like sessions, for the most part JS shouldn't be needed, however.
Why do supercomputers need to look sexy? XT3's look good, but, I mean that might be more of me loving what's inside, but that's another story for another post. Most supercomputers are kept in machine/server rooms, no? People don't normally see these things, so why does it matter if they look sexy? Decent is enough.
BTW, it's fugly:) (Ok, maybe not that bad, but I still don't like it).
Ditto, I'm usually logged in so I never noticed them, but I'm on my father's laptop now, and holy crap, it's ridiculous! The "D2" system SUCKS! PLEASE/., get rid of the interstitial ads and the D2 system: they make it almost impossible to enjoy the discussion.
VBA is very nice and helps implement little features that come in handy, especially in Excel.
I don't think there is any reason VBA cannot be part of the standard, as long as it itself is standardized. There is no reason that this tool should be removed because of dumb users. The default setting in office is to not allow macros and if you want to use them you have to turn them on, I'm perfectly fine with that.
This is probably my naivety, but what is the matter with TeX or LaTeX? Especially since it is software generated, there shouldn't be anything you can't format, plus the bonus of all the math type built in?
" 'Perhapses that knowledge could allow them to reduce the footprint of the full sized version, maybe? Hopefully?'
There seems to be a problem with Firefox's spell checker too. That should be fixed in the next release."
Was that a knock at me? ispell, openoffice, and firefox all found nothing wrong with what I wrote. As for the spell checker, I find it quite useful and well designed (although there are somethings that trip it up).
My question has nothing to do with monolithic vs microkernel. My question has to do with why are these programs being including with the kernel.
Only one hardware branch of the kernel gets compiled, and yes, I know I can choose not to compile many things into the kernel, and do so whenever I compile it.
See the post below you for an answer that was helpful. Compare that to your answer, and figure out how to answer a question instead of trying to belittle someone.
See, now, that would make sense. So it's not the entire virtualization programs, just hardware hooks and drivers, basically? Meaning that there still needs to be a separate program to take care of actuality running things and what not?
...why should virtualization technology be incorporated into the kernel, and not kept outside, as a "3rd" party app? Shouldn't the kernel be essentially a library and some low level support (multi-tasking, handle certain interrupts, that sort of stuff)? I've never really even considered bash, or even ls as part of the kernel. Am I just really mistaken, or is the word kernel used more broadly than that?
This is probably a dumb question to some, but I guess I'm too young. What exactly sets a mainframe apart from a cluster of commodity boxes? The wikipedia articles wasn't all too much help.
Exactly! There would be no reason to use all the energy to replicate all of that "junk" if it had no purpose. Even if it was just there to make the frequency of mutations in genes less, then survivability with it is enhanced over not having it. I love it when science throws out old ideas and brings in the new!
I loved his show! I'm 20 and I remeber watching it and being very upset when it wasn't on TV (localy at least). I learned so much about science and he is one of the reason I am going to go for my phd. I remeber clearly the episode he showed where absolute zero came from:)
My condolences to his family. He was an awesome guy!
I wasn't even considering those, but alternative splicing could use an exon to code for a gene product here, and leave it out to code for a related, but different product later.
Did you read the part on alternative splicing...? The do express things, just not all the time. Hell, not all exons are expressed all the time, the line between them is thin at times.
Your sig is wrong. Introns are used during alternative splicing to make more possible gene products than genes. Also, introns are suspected in regulation of genes. There is a reason for them, or they wouldn't exists, that's how a lot of bio works (vestigial organs are old things going away, introns are "new" evolutionarily, so they must be useful, in theory).
At the very least, you cannot say they do nothing, because they are known to do some things...
Slashdot Mirror
Do we use 44khz because of the Shannon-Nyquest Theorem and that music is recorded at 20khz?
Pencil and paper. I had this issue in both my math and chemistry classes. It was defiantly worth it to just do it on paper and then translate them into teX later.
REST also doesn't allow sessions. The only way to do auth in rest is via HTTP, and that's shittily implemented in browsers (ugly, no way to log out, no way to log in from any page). Cookies are fine. I like sessions, for the most part JS shouldn't be needed, however.
"print page for FEWER ads" FTFY
Why not your wife?
I agree with you about Jobs; I think it's foolish to base the stocks of a company on the CEO.
Most of the time the sysadmins don't even get to see them...
Why do supercomputers need to look sexy? XT3's look good, but, I mean that might be more of me loving what's inside, but that's another story for another post. Most supercomputers are kept in machine/server rooms, no? People don't normally see these things, so why does it matter if they look sexy? Decent is enough.
BTW, it's fugly:) (Ok, maybe not that bad, but I still don't like it).
Ditto, I'm usually logged in so I never noticed them, but I'm on my father's laptop now, and holy crap, it's ridiculous! The "D2" system SUCKS! PLEASE /., get rid of the interstitial ads and the D2 system: they make it almost impossible to enjoy the discussion.
VBA is very nice and helps implement little features that come in handy, especially in Excel.
I don't think there is any reason VBA cannot be part of the standard, as long as it itself is standardized. There is no reason that this tool should be removed because of dumb users. The default setting in office is to not allow macros and if you want to use them you have to turn them on, I'm perfectly fine with that.
This is probably my naivety, but what is the matter with TeX or LaTeX? Especially since it is software generated, there shouldn't be anything you can't format, plus the bonus of all the math type built in?
Mine's called Jane*, but that's besides the point. I also hate it when people call things a "USB."
*After my love: Jane Eyre
haha, do I feel foolish....
" 'Perhapses that knowledge could allow them to reduce the footprint of the full sized version, maybe? Hopefully?'
There seems to be a problem with Firefox's spell checker too. That should be fixed in the next release."
Was that a knock at me? ispell, openoffice, and firefox all found nothing wrong with what I wrote. As for the spell checker, I find it quite useful and well designed (although there are somethings that trip it up).
Perhapses that knowledge could allow them to reduce the footprint of the full sized version, maybe? Hopefully?
Thanks, that all makes sense now.
My question has nothing to do with monolithic vs microkernel. My question has to do with why are these programs being including with the kernel.
Only one hardware branch of the kernel gets compiled, and yes, I know I can choose not to compile many things into the kernel, and do so whenever I compile it.
See the post below you for an answer that was helpful. Compare that to your answer, and figure out how to answer a question instead of trying to belittle someone.
See, now, that would make sense. So it's not the entire virtualization programs, just hardware hooks and drivers, basically? Meaning that there still needs to be a separate program to take care of actuality running things and what not?
...why should virtualization technology be incorporated into the kernel, and not kept outside, as a "3rd" party app? Shouldn't the kernel be essentially a library and some low level support (multi-tasking, handle certain interrupts, that sort of stuff)? I've never really even considered bash, or even ls as part of the kernel. Am I just really mistaken, or is the word kernel used more broadly than that?
gah, "article", singular.
This is probably a dumb question to some, but I guess I'm too young. What exactly sets a mainframe apart from a cluster of commodity boxes? The wikipedia articles wasn't all too much help.
Exactly! There would be no reason to use all the energy to replicate all of that "junk" if it had no purpose. Even if it was just there to make the frequency of mutations in genes less, then survivability with it is enhanced over not having it. I love it when science throws out old ideas and brings in the new!
I loved his show! I'm 20 and I remeber watching it and being very upset when it wasn't on TV (localy at least). I learned so much about science and he is one of the reason I am going to go for my phd. I remeber clearly the episode he showed where absolute zero came from:)
My condolences to his family. He was an awesome guy!
I wasn't even considering those, but alternative splicing could use an exon to code for a gene product here, and leave it out to code for a related, but different product later.
Did you read the part on alternative splicing...? The do express things, just not all the time. Hell, not all exons are expressed all the time, the line between them is thin at times.
I know that this is OT, my apologies...
Your sig is wrong. Introns are used during alternative splicing to make more possible gene products than genes. Also, introns are suspected in regulation of genes. There is a reason for them, or they wouldn't exists, that's how a lot of bio works (vestigial organs are old things going away, introns are "new" evolutionarily, so they must be useful, in theory).
At the very least, you cannot say they do nothing, because they are known to do some things...