"Like it or not, Canadians are american, as are mexicans, columbians, brazillians and so forth."
Just goes to show how ineffective the Border Patrol really is.... Seriously, as Americans; Mexicans, Columbians and Brazilians deserve to be capitalized. Not sure who started the mis-label Americans as applied to the U.S., but it does sound better than U.S.ers, which is pretty awkward at best. Just call us "Chief" or "Sir" with the sort of respect that doesn't get your nose broken.LOL
Nope, my rock that keeps bears away is.45 cal. brass jacketed. Works good for prevention of home intrusion, car jacking, keeping the ex-wifes husband away, and any previous business associates polite and on point. Not much different than rattlesnakes, skunks and badgers, nothing ever really changes.
The fact is I DO say anything I want to to anyone. I always have. I know you are itching to pull out the bit about shouting " fire" in a crowded theater, but that actually constitutes a criminal attack and not free speech at all.I do have free speech, how I use it is no different than how I use a car, a hammer or a weapon, all of which I am free to use as well. To dredge up the bit about police is pedestrian and generic as well. Knowing full well that police are just as able as any human to commit atrocities, they too may be put down. Granted, it may provide a sticky situation and legal entanglements, but in the right situation I would just as easily shoot a cop as a crackhead with a knife and bad intent. Being in the right,I would face a trial by a jury of my peers and be vindicated, so you can stuff your knee-jerk pissant talking points up your urethra. Perhaps it would serve you better to know what the hell you are talking about before jealously rationalizing your impotence to demand your right from your own dictatorial government. People own guns, subjects don't. Fight for your rights to life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness or quit defending your oppressors in hopes of fitting in with the sheep, you appear to be a sissified ass-kisser.
Nope, it's called self defense, standing your ground, protecting yourself. Vigilantism would have me hunting down the offender and torching his house with his family inside. Big difference. Get over your whiny self.
Democracy bombs should have been outlawed in Geneva. What a horrible thing to do to another country! It's like giving others venereal warts on purpose. There needs to be a vaccine for democrazy.
Yes, safer would be more accurate to reach an intended target. Perhaps" farther" would be a consideration as well. Greater damage upon impact would be a nice goal of efficiency, as well.
I wonder if there are some designs for printing bullets to reload in MY guns, based on this concept. That would be awesome. Perhaps dimpling them like a golf ball, or adding an explosive payload inside....
"The addition of fluoride to drinking water in the USA is well below the rates required for fluorosis."
Well someone says so anyway, gosh doctors are always right aren't they. Especially the ones paid to say so. They also seem to prescribe more medicine than is necessary, that also cause more symptoms than they cure, but that facillitates prescribing more medicines. Uhm, yeah major public advancements, you can keep them to yourself, thanks. I prefer not to be a gullible dumbass.
Yeah, the war powers act has been in constant effect since Korea, since we never actually have NOT been at war with them since the 50s. No treaty has ever been signed. The government uses THIS to justify any and all things unconstitutional, like homeland security, spying on the people, or anything else that has made you say; "how can they do that?", since then. Now you know.
A right would be pointless if there were never an occasion to use it. So far the existence of the right has made an environment where its exercise has not yet been necessary.It serves the people well.
The 3rd is reflective of the times during the Revolutionary War in which the Kings troops were billeted in houses of common people who were forced to feed and shelter their oppressors. This of course will also apply to domestic troops, police, NSA, or anyone in government. It was a concern once, who is to say it couldn't be in the future as well. Like I say, the right creates an environment.
I personally like living in a place where I can say what I choose, right or wrong, to anyone, anytime without fear of repercussions based on their office, class, religion, ethnicity and if there is; I can sue the pants off them in court and make a public spectacle of them. I notice this right gets plenty of exercise.
Open carry of weapons has always been around, but seldom used. Rural places have farmers that will carry a pistol on their hip, now and then,(like an old uncle or two of mine, and my grandfather as well) to ward off rattlesnakes, skunks, badgers or the neighbors illegal Mexican farmhands burgling outbuildings, neighbors dog raiding the chickenhouse,( all of which actually occurred) etc. I can recall seeing one walk into the bank to do business, without raising anyones eyebrows, with a revolver on his hip. Today, with concealed carry and the training that accompanies it, I hear many MORE tales of those defending their selves, family and property, successfully. Occasionally I will hear of misadventures, but then, if you license a nation to drive, you will occasionally have collisions, so what?
If you actually use logic on the situation, the nuts are those who would deny people the right to defend themselves and their families. There is NO defense for this stance that doesn't arise from selfish fear placed in their heads by the ignorant. The state is incapable of providing police protection around the clock to everyone. Notice the police show up AFTER a crime has been commited, not before. Guns are an important part of a life in pursuit of happiness like a set of wrenches is an important part of doing maintenance on your car. Further, the intention of the right exists, should the people ever need to take back control of their Constitutional government, no matter what government licensed lawyers my lie about. THAT, is the reason the issue gets ANY attention at all in D.C.
The FBI isn't yet aware of the NSAs little brown submarine drones that listen in on FBI scuttlebutt in the loo. Periscope UP! Only assholes in here captain.
No, no, you're thinking of Mao having peasants pull dry turds from his heroin addicted ass. Omama has a team of Secret service to pull his head from his ass.( the ears make it difficult)
To rinse your mouth after eating and neutralize the acids that harm teeth is FAR more effective at fighting decay than slowly poisoning yourself to meet government recommendations.Therefore water IS still the focus.Don't be a yuckmouth.
Yeah, think so? This highlights the value of privacy and places an appropriate cost on it for me. If you want my details bad enough to meet the value of my privacy, you will give up some dignity, do a good job and swallow, once a week for as long as you sell MY details. No negotiation, this is final. Don't like it? Don't use my details.
Still, that doesn't speak to the individual AND as I noted elsewhere, when all have less, there is no scarcity. BUT, take away that and the desperation for survival kicks in along with the urgency of acquisition of necessity. So , NO, it is TRUE.
Of course he approved it! The Democrats put a retard in office, because he would be easy to control! He obviously suffers Microcephilia, he has a head the size of a baseball! http://www.halloweenforum.com/... , http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... Contrast and compare.
They can keep their bullshit debit card, I want a blowjob from time to time if they want to track me. It seems that I have the merchandise, therefore I get to set the price and reject their offer. Tracking= 1 blowjob a week; firm, take it or leave it. No negotiation.
Nope , you're naiive because "ripping off people" is universal in all cultures and is only defeated at an individual level. Crack a newspaper or a history book open. Surprise, you don't live in Utopia. So making sweeping statements about your culture also makes you look retarded.
You seem to have imagined a generalized assumption of my circumstances. I associate cheating with an abstract action, I associate stealing with a concrete action. Either will put you in harms way, in arms reach. Yes, the problem is age old and universal no matter what government, class, walk of life, religion it is filtered through. In my case, even with a job I had just acquired that paid MORE, I found myself in circumstances brought about by the actions of others that had me losing 100 lb in 3 months, not due to drug use, but starvation so my woman and child could survive as I plotted an escape by whatever means presented themselves, in an unfriendly environment. I stole, I conned, I inadertantly wound up mugging an attacker for his wallet and left him with no front teeth and a broken nose. unconscious in FRONT of a bar in a major city.I cheated many, some deserved it, some probably deserved it, some didn't. It was winter and our fuel was stolen, even as I dodged rent and saved every penny to get us and a few items to a safe place in a distant city. I gave up my possessions, used up my resources and we survived. In the good ol' U.S. Yes, most of my "victims" were those who put me in my circumstances, others I just scammed money from. I've tried to pay it forward over time, but, if you are ever REALLY there, you will too.
Even the rich of the world will rip each other throats out if they perceive that tomorrow will not be as full as today. I don't think it is different for any other subset of people in any era.
Slashdot Mirror
"Like it or not, Canadians are american, as are mexicans, columbians, brazillians and so forth."
Just goes to show how ineffective the Border Patrol really is....
Seriously, as Americans; Mexicans, Columbians and Brazilians deserve to be capitalized.
Not sure who started the mis-label Americans as applied to the U.S., but it does sound better than U.S.ers, which is pretty awkward at best.
Just call us "Chief" or "Sir" with the sort of respect that doesn't get your nose broken.LOL
LOL, yeah.
Nope, my rock that keeps bears away is .45 cal. brass jacketed. Works good for prevention of home intrusion, car jacking, keeping the ex-wifes husband away, and any previous business associates polite and on point. Not much different than rattlesnakes, skunks and badgers, nothing ever really changes.
The fact is I DO say anything I want to to anyone. I always have. I know you are itching to pull out the bit about shouting " fire" in a crowded theater, but that actually constitutes a criminal attack and not free speech at all.I do have free speech, how I use it is no different than how I use a car, a hammer or a weapon, all of which I am free to use as well. To dredge up the bit about police is pedestrian and generic as well. Knowing full well that police are just as able as any human to commit atrocities, they too may be put down. Granted, it may provide a sticky situation and legal entanglements, but in the right situation I would just as easily shoot a cop as a crackhead with a knife and bad intent. Being in the right ,I would face a trial by a jury of my peers and be vindicated, so you can stuff your knee-jerk pissant talking points up your urethra. Perhaps it would serve you better to know what the hell you are talking about before jealously rationalizing your impotence to demand your right from your own dictatorial government. People own guns, subjects don't. Fight for your rights to life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness or quit defending your oppressors in hopes of fitting in with the sheep, you appear to be a sissified ass-kisser.
Nope, it's called self defense, standing your ground, protecting yourself. Vigilantism would have me hunting down the offender and torching his house with his family inside.
Big difference. Get over your whiny self.
Democracy bombs should have been outlawed in Geneva. What a horrible thing to do to another country! It's like giving others venereal warts on purpose.
There needs to be a vaccine for democrazy.
Yes, safer would be more accurate to reach an intended target. Perhaps" farther" would be a consideration as well. Greater damage upon impact would be a nice goal of efficiency, as well.
I wonder if there are some designs for printing bullets to reload in MY guns, based on this concept. That would be awesome.
Perhaps dimpling them like a golf ball, or adding an explosive payload inside....
"The addition of fluoride to drinking water in the USA is well below the rates required for fluorosis."
Well someone says so anyway, gosh doctors are always right aren't they. Especially the ones paid to say so. They also seem to prescribe more medicine than is necessary, that also cause more symptoms than they cure, but that facillitates prescribing more medicines. Uhm, yeah major public advancements, you can keep them to yourself, thanks. I prefer not to be a gullible dumbass.
Yeah, the war powers act has been in constant effect since Korea, since we never actually have NOT been at war with them since the 50s. No treaty has ever been signed. The government uses THIS to justify any and all things unconstitutional, like homeland security, spying on the people, or anything else that has made you say; "how can they do that?", since then. Now you know.
A right would be pointless if there were never an occasion to use it. So far the existence of the right has made an environment where its exercise has not yet been necessary.It serves the people well.
The 3rd is reflective of the times during the Revolutionary War in which the Kings troops were billeted in houses of common people who were forced to feed and shelter their oppressors. This of course will also apply to domestic troops, police, NSA, or anyone in government. It was a concern once, who is to say it couldn't be in the future as well. Like I say, the right creates an environment.
I personally like living in a place where I can say what I choose, right or wrong, to anyone, anytime without fear of repercussions based on their office, class, religion, ethnicity and if there is; I can sue the pants off them in court and make a public spectacle of them. I notice this right gets plenty of exercise.
Open carry of weapons has always been around, but seldom used. Rural places have farmers that will carry a pistol on their hip, now and then,(like an old uncle or two of mine, and my grandfather as well) to ward off rattlesnakes, skunks, badgers or the neighbors illegal Mexican farmhands burgling outbuildings, neighbors dog raiding the chickenhouse,( all of which actually occurred) etc. I can recall seeing one walk into the bank to do business, without raising anyones eyebrows, with a revolver on his hip. Today, with concealed carry and the training that accompanies it, I hear many MORE tales of those defending their selves, family and property, successfully. Occasionally I will hear of misadventures, but then, if you license a nation to drive, you will occasionally have collisions, so what?
If you actually use logic on the situation, the nuts are those who would deny people the right to defend themselves and their families. There is NO defense for this stance that doesn't arise from selfish fear placed in their heads by the ignorant. The state is incapable of providing police protection around the clock to everyone. Notice the police show up AFTER a crime has been commited, not before. Guns are an important part of a life in pursuit of happiness like a set of wrenches is an important part of doing maintenance on your car. Further, the intention of the right exists, should the people ever need to take back control of their Constitutional government, no matter what government licensed lawyers my lie about. THAT, is the reason the issue gets ANY attention at all in D.C.
The FBI isn't yet aware of the NSAs little brown submarine drones that listen in on FBI scuttlebutt in the loo.
Periscope UP! Only assholes in here captain.
No, no, you're thinking of Mao having peasants pull dry turds from his heroin addicted ass.
Omama has a team of Secret service to pull his head from his ass.( the ears make it difficult)
function=1 dysfunction=0
To rinse your mouth after eating and neutralize the acids that harm teeth is FAR more effective at fighting decay than slowly poisoning yourself to meet government recommendations.Therefore water IS still the focus.Don't be a yuckmouth.
The future holds nothing different from the past, just rearranged and painted a different color.
Yeah, think so? This highlights the value of privacy and places an appropriate cost on it for me. If you want my details bad enough to meet the value of my privacy, you will give up some dignity, do a good job and swallow, once a week for as long as you sell MY details. No negotiation, this is final. Don't like it? Don't use my details.
Still, that doesn't speak to the individual AND as I noted elsewhere, when all have less, there is no scarcity. BUT, take away that and the desperation for survival kicks in along with the urgency of acquisition of necessity. So , NO, it is TRUE.
Of course he approved it! The Democrats put a retard in office, because he would be easy to control! He obviously suffers Microcephilia, he has a head the size of a baseball! http://www.halloweenforum.com/... , http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... Contrast and compare.
They can keep their bullshit debit card, I want a blowjob from time to time if they want to track me. It seems that I have the merchandise, therefore I get to set the price and reject their offer. Tracking= 1 blowjob a week; firm, take it or leave it. No negotiation.
What is is the past is plainly seen and therefore in front of you. What you can't see, the future, must therefore be behind you.
Nope , you're naiive because "ripping off people" is universal in all cultures and is only defeated at an individual level. Crack a newspaper or a history book open. Surprise, you don't live in Utopia. So making sweeping statements about your culture also makes you look retarded.
You seem to have imagined a generalized assumption of my circumstances.
I associate cheating with an abstract action, I associate stealing with a concrete action. Either will put you in harms way, in arms reach.
Yes, the problem is age old and universal no matter what government, class, walk of life, religion it is filtered through. In my case, even with a job I had just acquired that paid MORE, I found myself in circumstances brought about by the actions of others that had me losing 100 lb in 3 months, not due to drug use, but starvation so my woman and child could survive as I plotted an escape by whatever means presented themselves, in an unfriendly environment. I stole, I conned, I inadertantly wound up mugging an attacker for his wallet and left him with no front teeth and a broken nose. unconscious in FRONT of a bar in a major city.I cheated many, some deserved it, some probably deserved it, some didn't. It was winter and our fuel was stolen, even as I dodged rent and saved every penny to get us and a few items to a safe place in a distant city. I gave up my possessions, used up my resources and we survived. In the good ol' U.S.
Yes, most of my "victims" were those who put me in my circumstances, others I just scammed money from. I've tried to pay it forward over time, but, if you are ever REALLY there, you will too.
Even the rich of the world will rip each other throats out if they perceive that tomorrow will not be as full as today. I don't think it is different for any other subset of people in any era.
Government is just smoke and mirrors distracting from the problem at hand, as it has plagues all people for all time under all govenrment.
Government is a red herring in this. The problem plagues all walks of life, under all authority and has for all time.
To assume makes an ass of u not me. ass-u-me