I agree with you. Google is in a much higher profit business with much less overhead. Verizon should just charge google much much more for using their network. Then, Verizon's profits go up while googles go down.... Oops, Competition!! Doh! I am sure other network providers would love to google use them instead of verizon.
Okay, so you say I am wrong. Dark matter isn't causing the accelerating (positive) expansion of the universe. But, then what is the theory as to why this (positively accelerating expansion) has recently been observed? Whats pushing us?
I thought Dark matter effectively functioned like negative gravity so as to account for the accelerated expanding universe? How does the graviton explain this phenomenon?
Same thing I was thinking. It only says students who "graduate from american universities", not US Citizens. Surely they were not that stupid up there at Duke. I am betting it was just a sucky reporting job.
Sounds good, but I don't know how well the partial download would go over. I doubt that many kids would have been happy only getting cetain body parts of their favorite action figure that they could eventually piece together and make a toy that you could actually play with. Why would you only want spiderman's arm and leg? Would that encourage return customers, or actually not be a good enough incentive to make the purchase in the first place?
I have installed DR17 from CVS on my gentoo distribution, so I was really interested in looking at vector linux's website after reading this. However, it appears to me that since I can't get through, then they must have been slashdotted.
Do you think this would happen at the apple retail stores if the prices would be lowered? Should apple marketing re-think and re-model the optimum revenue generated (as a function of volume and pricing) system?
Speaking of Roadmaps... Why not would Apple not switch to AMD? AMD's chips run with less power consumption and way less number of transistors. When comparing the Dual core chips from AMD and Intel, AMD wins on power consumption. But I thought Jobs said Intel had the best Performance per watt?
ADA4800DAA6CD (AMD Dual core 64-bit): 110W
Intel® Pentium® Processor Extreme Edition: 130W
These are the latest and greatest from Intel and AMD right?
I am looking at the Fermilab press release and it states, "When in 1929 Edwin Hubble proved that the universe is in fact expanding, Einstein repudiated his cosmological constant, calling it 'the greatest blunder of my life.'"
I may be mistaken here, but I thought that Einstein's Cosmological Constant was introduced to modify His theory so that it would not predict an expansion in the Universe? Then that would explain why the article from Fermilab says that He later repudiated His Cosmological Constant after Edwin Hubble verified the expansion experimentally.
After reading it over and over again, I still get from the article that Einstein's Cosmological Constant was added to the theory to explain the expansion. But didn't His theory already explain expansion? And if so, why would He "repudiate" something that was experimentally verified a few years later by Edwin Hubble? Then if His theory already predicted expansion, then the only purpose of introducing the Cosmological Constant that explains expansion would be to enhance the prediction in expansion rate, would it not?
Is there a contradiction in the article? Am I missing something?
Exactly. Expose is extremely handy. I use cadence to design digital IC's, and my productivity on the mac soars when compared to my productivity on a sun box or a windows machine. This is precisely because of expose and the many windows that I need to have open when using cadence to design circuits. Its not a toy to me! I've gotten to where I dred having to use cadence on a windows or sun box, and wish that I were using OS X.
I agree with you. Google is in a much higher profit business with much less overhead. Verizon should just charge google much much more for using their network. Then, Verizon's profits go up while googles go down.... Oops, Competition!! Doh! I am sure other network providers would love to google use them instead of verizon.
Okay, so you say I am wrong. Dark matter isn't causing the accelerating (positive) expansion of the universe. But, then what is the theory as to why this (positively accelerating expansion) has recently been observed? Whats pushing us?
I thought Dark matter effectively functioned like negative gravity so as to account for the accelerated expanding universe? How does the graviton explain this phenomenon?
Same thing I was thinking. It only says students who "graduate from american universities", not US Citizens. Surely they were not that stupid up there at Duke. I am betting it was just a sucky reporting job.
Sounds good, but I don't know how well the partial download would go over. I doubt that many kids would have been happy only getting cetain body parts of their favorite action figure that they could eventually piece together and make a toy that you could actually play with. Why would you only want spiderman's arm and leg? Would that encourage return customers, or actually not be a good enough incentive to make the purchase in the first place?
I have installed DR17 from CVS on my gentoo distribution, so I was really interested in looking at vector linux's website after reading this. However, it appears to me that since I can't get through, then they must have been slashdotted.
Do you think this would happen at the apple retail stores if the prices would be lowered? Should apple marketing re-think and re-model the optimum revenue generated (as a function of volume and pricing) system?
Speaking of Roadmaps... Why not would Apple not switch to AMD? AMD's chips run with less power consumption and way less number of transistors. When comparing the Dual core chips from AMD and Intel, AMD wins on power consumption. But I thought Jobs said Intel had the best Performance per watt? ADA4800DAA6CD (AMD Dual core 64-bit): 110W Intel® Pentium® Processor Extreme Edition: 130W These are the latest and greatest from Intel and AMD right?
Okay, Maybe I am an idiot... I meant Einstein's Cosmological Constant, NOT Newton's Cosmological Constant. Please still take my question seriously.
I used the Preview button, Honest!
Maybe somebody can help me out here.
I am looking at the Fermilab press release and it states, "When in 1929 Edwin Hubble proved that the universe is in fact expanding, Einstein repudiated his cosmological constant, calling it 'the greatest blunder of my life.'"
I may be mistaken here, but I thought that Einstein's Cosmological Constant was introduced to modify His theory so that it would not predict an expansion in the Universe? Then that would explain why the article from Fermilab says that He later repudiated His Cosmological Constant after Edwin Hubble verified the expansion experimentally.
After reading it over and over again, I still get from the article that Einstein's Cosmological Constant was added to the theory to explain the expansion. But didn't His theory already explain expansion? And if so, why would He "repudiate" something that was experimentally verified a few years later by Edwin Hubble? Then if His theory already predicted expansion, then the only purpose of introducing the Cosmological Constant that explains expansion would be to enhance the prediction in expansion rate, would it not?
Is there a contradiction in the article? Am I missing something?
Exactly. Expose is extremely handy. I use cadence to design digital IC's, and my productivity on the mac soars when compared to my productivity on a sun box or a windows machine. This is precisely because of expose and the many windows that I need to have open when using cadence to design circuits. Its not a toy to me! I've gotten to where I dred having to use cadence on a windows or sun box, and wish that I were using OS X.
That analyst obviously hasn't spent much time working with OS X. It certainly has style and function in my opinion.