I was thinking of "What Happens in Vegas", yup, I'm pretty sure they've put all the best punch lines in the trailers. You can tell when a movie hits about four different trailers that, yup, you've watched the best fifteen minutes of the movie already.
I don't know I think if I had that kind of space I might go for dual or triple projectors. After I posted, it occured to me that, that office looks like it hasn't ever been worked in at all, you notice how none of the desks have pens, papers, books, phones, people? It looks more like a monitoring site than any sort of a workspace. I think if it were my personal office I might clear out at least two rows of crap for just some simple table space.
What about piping it through large algae tanks? yea the tank would have to ensure that no leaks would happen, but you could kill two birds with one stone, hell you'd even have all the same old corporate cronies around to
sorry but this is all bullshit, yes shareholders are fucking retarded, you included. the market is going to move down sometimes, you can compare a company's 5yr high to their 5yr low (albeit current price), and say that they are completely fucking things over. Long term profits, according to everything I've read, are much more likely to come from the deal with Google.
I don't own any Yahoo stock atm, but they will probably get bought for $33 a share; so your and smart money's rhetoric doesn't mean much anyhow
no it won't, and you can go on and on about how these poor shareholders aren't all millionaires and blah blah blah. I don't really give a shit, they're slash and burn next quarter investors, where a drop of $20 over two years is reason enough to sue? Nah, you might be modded insightful but you are way overrated.
I'm not really trying to pick on you, but I think it's funny that people seem to think that none of this occurred to Yahoo. MS needs Yahoo, Yahoo does not need MS, Ballmer might want everyone to think and talk like Yahoo needs this deal, but that's been Ballmer's problem the whole time. He's full of shit.
There's some confusion going around here on this subject, you seem to understand as well as the gp. Yes it's illegal to commit perjury, but it's extremely difficult to prove almost to the point that it's a worthless item to prosecute on. The story reads like they are actually going to push for perjury, what it actually takes to prosecute someone for this I have no idea. I know people lie every day in court, they change their story here and change it there, people are so dishonest prosecuting for perjury basically, amounts to writing someone a ticket for eating ice cream on Sunday.
software support is more like insurance, it's there when you need it. you don't buy support and sit on the phone with them all day, you call support when you have exhausted all avenues or when you need to get things back up and running asap.
Slashdot Mirror
I think he works for microsoft.
rats -> titanic
;)
slashdot -> microsoft
yes, the ship is sinking, but slowly
this is a really good I idea, I've often thought that slashdot handles abuse rather well, except for teh groupthinks and moderator gangs.
now mages will argue for their spell books and prison riots will look like old vietnam footage.
Yes! It is!
I was thinking of "What Happens in Vegas", yup, I'm pretty sure they've put all the best punch lines in the trailers. You can tell when a movie hits about four different trailers that, yup, you've watched the best fifteen minutes of the movie already.
but not according to the museum of hoaxes
indoors you could dunk it in vegatable oil: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1657251 http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/3153/P20/
I don't know I think if I had that kind of space I might go for dual or triple projectors. After I posted, it occured to me that, that office looks like it hasn't ever been worked in at all, you notice how none of the desks have pens, papers, books, phones, people? It looks more like a monitoring site than any sort of a workspace. I think if it were my personal office I might clear out at least two rows of crap for just some simple table space.
yeah, you're kinda right. I hate this one though http://valleywag.com/photogallery/Microsoftheadquarters/1001409837 I could get nothing done here, too much ability to see and talk, plus I'd never get to browse slashdot - I'd always feel like big brother was there. this one caught my eye too, diggin' the book layout below the monitor http://valleywag.com/photogallery/GoogleplexWorst/1001410045 of course that might just be a laptop with papers over the keyboard.
What about piping it through large algae tanks? yea the tank would have to ensure that no leaks would happen, but you could kill two birds with one stone, hell you'd even have all the same old corporate cronies around to
sorry but this is all bullshit, yes shareholders are fucking retarded, you included. the market is going to move down sometimes, you can compare a company's 5yr high to their 5yr low (albeit current price), and say that they are completely fucking things over. Long term profits, according to everything I've read, are much more likely to come from the deal with Google.
I don't own any Yahoo stock atm, but they will probably get bought for $33 a share; so your and smart money's rhetoric doesn't mean much anyhowno it won't, and you can go on and on about how these poor shareholders aren't all millionaires and blah blah blah. I don't really give a shit, they're slash and burn next quarter investors, where a drop of $20 over two years is reason enough to sue? Nah, you might be modded insightful but you are way overrated.
YHOO hit the mid 40s for approximately one week two years ago.
No I didn't, I think shareholders are idiots.
http://www.smartmoney.com/commonsense/index.cfm?story=20080506-yahoo-microsoft-deal&pgnum=1
Google's been a more profitable possibility from day one. Like I said, Yahoo didn't need this as much as MS did.
that's funny, i forgot JAVA
I'm not really trying to pick on you, but I think it's funny that people seem to think that none of this occurred to Yahoo. MS needs Yahoo, Yahoo does not need MS, Ballmer might want everyone to think and talk like Yahoo needs this deal, but that's been Ballmer's problem the whole time. He's full of shit.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SUN&t=my&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=
Basically, Sun and Apple have performed well against the Nasdaq computer index while MSFT has been chained to the index.
most AD implementations are
Network (y/n)
email (y/n)
drive access (y/n)
the next biggest feature is software that makes single signon workable.
anyways it was just a joke
it's kinda like LDAP, there's probably a windoze user around here that's used it.
...but does it run linux?
There's some confusion going around here on this subject, you seem to understand as well as the gp. Yes it's illegal to commit perjury, but it's extremely difficult to prove almost to the point that it's a worthless item to prosecute on. The story reads like they are actually going to push for perjury, what it actually takes to prosecute someone for this I have no idea. I know people lie every day in court, they change their story here and change it there, people are so dishonest prosecuting for perjury basically, amounts to writing someone a ticket for eating ice cream on Sunday.
software support is more like insurance, it's there when you need it. you don't buy support and sit on the phone with them all day, you call support when you have exhausted all avenues or when you need to get things back up and running asap.
how in the hell is this a goddamn troll, no i'm not going to explain my position, some asshole needs read
why do you say that? I'm sure I'm missing something.
oh shit, where was I yesterday...