Slashdot Mirror


Help Slashdot Test Our New Data Center

After many years of living in California, Slashdot is preparing to move to a new data center in Chicago, and we need your help. We have our new site running a dump of our database from a few days ago. You can hit it at beta.slashdot.org. Please go there, post comments, submit stories, and do whatever you do normally. Or maybe abnormally — run crawlers, write poll spamming robots or something. If you find any crazy issues, please submit them to our sourceforge tracker. If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM.

308 comments

  1. well done slashdot by nih · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's working gre

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    1. Re:well done slashdot by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      It didn't accept my test-comment a la "(asdf )+" due to lameness. I thought that tests always were to accept lame comments for the purpose of testing. Oh well, I'm off to install Lingua::ManagementSpeak for some real tests then.

    2. Re:well done slashdot by troll · · Score: 1

      Chicago...why?

      --
      Official Pi Ambassador -- inquire for details!
    3. Re:well done slashdot by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      A far better liquid heat sink is readily available, about 15 degrees cooler on average, and Chicago understands the value of a good flame.

      In California, the heat sink will likely one day completely submerge the datacenter. Great for cooling; bad for uptime.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    4. Re:well done slashdot by marafa · · Score: 0

      oh great! .. bad karma here AND there!

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    5. Re:well done slashdot by zonker · · Score: 0

      You joke but there is something to this. I'll bet the energy cost to power and cool a datacenter in Chicago is much lower than anywhere in CA. Sinking into the ocean notwithstanding...

  2. Old content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not much fun to play with a system with old stuff from a few days ago. How about a real test with more current content?

    1. Re:Old content by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those aren't old stories, they're dupes.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  3. Wow...all that computer power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow...all that power just to push a few kilobytes of text to my computer.

    1. Re:Wow...all that computer power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, with a mysql and perl combination... it's not hard to see why they need all that power.

    2. Re:Wow...all that computer power! by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Before the site's CSS redesign they were planning to have twenty new data centers in Chicago. It was the data center plans that led to the redesign.

  4. Obligitory by BluffBlank · · Score: 5, Funny

    But does it run linux?

    1. Re:Obligitory by tkid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read the history of Slashdot when it hit 10 year anniversary mark? I think someone should go read and stop asking silly questions.

    2. Re:Obligitory by brxndxn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    3. Re:Obligitory by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

      Ok, I don't know how that was off topic if you knew what tkid was talking about. Were you there? I am wearing the shirt right now as a matter of fact and it is clear what tkid meant. (Ok, not actually wearing the shirt right now, but I do have the shirt and remember what it says, so I was telling the truth because I'll wear it tomorrow and claim time lapse doctrine applies)

      --
      Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
    4. Re:Obligitory by Deadfyre_Deadsoul · · Score: 1

      NASA is jealous of the /. computer....

      --
      ~DF
    5. Re:Obligitory by mabhatter654 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      imagine a Bewoulf cluster.....

    6. Re:Obligitory by davester666 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      2.3 GHz databases?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Obligitory by krgallagher · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "But does it run linux?"

      I know that was meant to be a joke, but that is my question. What is the OS? What is the Database engine? What is the web server? Are you using a load balancer? Details! I want details!

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    8. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, who would want to when you can run Windows Server 2008 with IIS7?!

    9. Re:Obligitory by __aanjtz122 · · Score: 2, Informative

      $ lynx -dump -head http://beta.slashdot.org/ | grep Server

      Server: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4

      So that's one question answered :-)

    10. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooohhhhh... diss.

    11. Re:Obligitory by Hatta · · Score: 5, Informative

      iblis% sudo nmap -A -T4 beta.slashdot.org

      Starting Nmap 4.53 ( http://insecure.org/ ) at 2008-05-23 15:00 CDT
      SCRIPT ENGINE: rpcinfo.nse is not a file.
      SCRIPT ENGINE: Aborting script scan.
      Interesting ports on beta.slashdot.org (216.34.181.45):
      Not shown: 1704 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
      21/tcp open tcpwrapped
      25/tcp filtered smtp
      80/tcp open http Apache httpd 1.3.41 ((Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4)
      135/tcp filtered msrpc
      136/tcp filtered profile
      137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
      138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
      139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
      443/tcp open ssl/http Apache httpd 1.3.41 ((Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4)
      445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
      Device type: general purpose
      Running (JUST GUESSING) : OpenBSD 4.X (91%)
      Aggressive OS guesses: OpenBSD 4.1 (x86) (91%), OpenBSD 4.0 - 4.2 (90%), OpenBSD 4.0 (88%), OpenBSD 4.0 (x86) (86%)
      No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
      Network Distance: 10 hops

      TRACEROUTE (using port 21/tcp)
      HOP RTT ADDRESS
      1 0.25 beta.slashdot.org (216.34.181.45)

      OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://insecure.org/nmap/submit/ .
      Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 32.605 seconds


      Looks like they're running OpenBSD of some sort.
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Obligitory by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's impossible. I thought BSD was dead, or at least dying.

    13. Re:Obligitory by kesuki · · Score: 1

      no, it makes so much sense if you think about it, all those crazy bugs when things like friends would disappear off friends lists etc, it had to be the 25 year old bug from BSD 4.2!!!

      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/11/1339228&from=rss

      i knew i wasn't imagining it that 'friends' would suddenly disappear off my friends list... it was obvious those friends were deleted when the 25th file of 28 was deleted, then the call for the 26th file was given and it would return the 27th file as response, clearly slashcode has been running BSD a long time, hopefully they've got the patch for that 25 year old bug, so people stop disappearing from friends lists.

    14. Re:Obligitory by livingdeadline · · Score: 4, Informative

      Netcraft thinks it's an F5 BIG-IP device, which probably means that they've got a big, fancy load balancer. If my memory doesn't fail me, F5's appliance OS is BSD based.

    15. Re:Obligitory by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      I guess that means that /. must be dying, too?!

    16. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is. Netcraft confirmed it.

    17. Re:Obligitory by hendridm · · Score: 1

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=beta.slashdot.org ...says they're using an F5 product on the front end. I wonder if beta.slashdot.org is simply a web accelerator in front of the real web servers or something??? :/

      In that case, they could be running something different on the actual servers.

    18. Re:Obligitory by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well

      Its interesting given all of Microsofts boasting about how isolated and secure II6 can be on Server 2008 that by the time you get any of their own applications actaully running like CRM, Sharepoint, or anything based on Commerce Server you have to grant all sorts of system rights you would rather not. The granularity being such that at most you can harden the system as well as IIS6 on server 2k3.

      One would expect Microsoft developers to have been made aware the anticipated changes and developed their applications with them in mind. So my conclusion haveing not tried personally to engineer any applications specifically for II7 and Server 2008 is that:

      1. None of its new features and isolation is of much value because any thing complex enough to be useful won't work until you disable or puch the holes that have existed for along time.

      2. Its not possible or so difficult to design an application that won't result in number 1

      3. Server 2008 and IIS7 probably can be the most secure host if all you want to do is serve static html pages. Eat that Apachee and BSD!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    19. Re:Obligitory by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      rats -> titanic
      slashdot -> microsoft

      yes, the ship is sinking, but slowly ;)

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    20. Re:Obligitory by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      That's impossible. I thought BSD was dead, or at least trying. Fixed that for you ;)

      --- Mr. DOS
    21. Re:Obligitory by Schemat1c · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you read the history of Slashdot when it hit 10 year anniversary mark? I think someone should go read and stop asking silly questions. Whoosh!
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    22. Re:Obligitory by yanyan · · Score: 1

      Silly questions? You must be new here.

    23. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what you're seeing is the result of the site running under this: http://www.f5.com/products/big-ip/

    24. Re:Obligitory by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      The current F5 boxes run Linux. Once upon a time they were BSDI, but that was many many years ago.

    25. Re:Obligitory by jmy · · Score: 1

      Obligatory myth-debunking have me quoting http://www.f5.com/pdf/white-papers/tmos-wp.pdf:

      "Many people have observed that a TMOS-based device has a form of Linux running on it, which can be seen when administering the device using the command line. It is important to note that this Linux system is not involved in any aspect of the traffic flowing through TMOS. TMOS has its own dedicated CPU, memory, and system bus for access to peripheral devices.
      When a TMOS-based device receives packets, everything from the wire to the system bus, from the networking subsystem to the memory management subsystem are completely self-contained within TMOS. Linux is never involved or aware of any of it; not even the Linux kernel. The Linux system is used for management tasks, such as the command line or the web GUI only."

    26. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F5 Big-IP this is some tweaked Linux and TMOS. I know NBC use similar/same products.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F5_Networks

    27. Re:Obligitory by koafc · · Score: 0

      But has the demise of BSD been confirmed by Netcraft yet?

    28. Re:Obligitory by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      With that much processing power, articles would be duped faster than we could read them!

    29. Re:Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe slashcode runs on RH9 with MySQL and Apache 1.3.

    30. Re:Obligitory by RobNich · · Score: 1

      Linux. According to one of mine:
      Linux [hostname that I removed] 2.4.21-9.4.4.65.0smp #2 SMP Mon Jan 28 19:08:25 PST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
    31. Re:Obligitory by livingdeadline · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was talking out of my ass, then. How exotic.

      On second thought, I might have confused f5 with netapp. They seem to use bsd in some appliances (search for BSD in the post).

      I know nothing about tcp/ip stacks, but it's interesting that netcraft's monitoring service claims to be able to separate generic linux machines from f5 ones, in my experience they don't recognize that many specialized OS'es (I've developed have some sort obsession with netcrafting sites I visit). Netapp and f5 are among the only special OSes i've seen detected properly on netcraft.

    32. Re:Obligitory by livingdeadline · · Score: 1

      More out-of-ass talking. I didn't notice that this post was in place already, with an explanation the f5 boxes' relationship with Linux. (Whatever Linux is in them faces only the management interface)

  5. oh yeah by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    my cowboy neal bot has already gained complete control of all survey functionality.
     
    A Natalie Portman statue and a 10 gallon tub of hot grits or I wont give control back. Oh - and I want the ponies theme back. Permanently.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GAWD. Read this too fast...

      A Natalie Portman statue and 10 gallon hot tub girls or I wont give control back.
  6. Re:Obligitory trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course not!

  7. new computer setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh, I've got calculators with more hardware than that. :D

  8. Abnormally? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Run abnormally? So, throw a few of these out there?

    ab -n 10000 -c 10 http://beta.slashdot.org/
    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Abnormally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So it was really a typo: Run ab normally.

    2. Re:Abnormally? by mnslinky · · Score: 1

      ab -n 100000 -c 10 http://beta.slashdot.org/
      This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev apache-2.0
      Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
      Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

      Benchmarking beta.slashdot.org (be patient)

      Test aborted after 10 failures

      apr_socket_connect(): Operation already in progress (37)
      Total of 7 requests complete

    3. Re:Abnormally? by zukinux · · Score: 1

      What's ab command? didn't get it right and it doesn't work for me...
      Or perhaps, it doesn't exists on Slackware :)

    4. Re:Abnormally? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apache benchmarker. If you have the right packages installed (e.g. 'apache2-utils' on Debian) it certainly exists on any Linux distro worth its salt.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    5. Re:Abnormally? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      ab used to be Sun's Answerbook. Online documentation.

    6. Re:Abnormally? by Fweeky · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Abnormally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does it say when I started ab before reading the comments...

    8. Re:Abnormally? by kohaku · · Score: 0

      It's probably in root's path; I'm running vanilla slack current, and it runs after su'ing.

    9. Re:Abnormally? by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      you don't have to su if you know the absolute path

      root@linux:/home/ed# cat /etc/slackware-version
      Slackware 12.0.0
      root@linux:/home/ed# ls -l `which ab`
      -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 46636 2007-07-01 19:12 /usr/sbin/ab
      root@linux:/home/ed# exit
      ed@linux:~$ /usr/sbin/ab -n 100000 -c 10 http://beta.slashdot.org/
      This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0
      Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
      Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

      Benchmarking beta.slashdot.org (be patient)

    10. Re:Abnormally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b -n 10000 -c 10 http://beta.slashdot.org/
      This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev apache-2.0
      Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
      Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

      Benchmarking beta.slashdot.org (be patient)
      Completed 1000 requests
      apr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (54)
      Total of 1326 requests completed

    11. Re:Abnormally? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      while [ 1 ];do curl -o /dev/null http://beta.slashdot.orgdone/

      Started that up on a few servers I have..

    12. Re:Abnormally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Server Software:        Apache/1.3.41
      Server Hostname:        beta.slashdot.org
      Server Port:            80

      Document Path:          /
      Document Length:        71419 bytes

      Concurrency Level:      100
      Time taken for tests:   398.772441 seconds
      Complete requests:      10000
      Failed requests:        9781
         (Connect: 0, Length: 9781, Exceptions: 0)
      Write errors:           0
      Total transferred:      718036044 bytes
      HTML transferred:       714467776 bytes
      Requests per second:    25.08 [#/sec] (mean)
      Time per request:       3987.724 [ms] (mean)
      Time per request:       39.877 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
      Transfer rate:          1758.41 [Kbytes/sec] received

      Connection Times (ms)
                    min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
      Connect:      111  416 106.7    411    3484
      Processing:  1924 3552 392.5   3501    9397
      Waiting:      145 1873 731.1   2057    3847
      Total:       2035 3969 383.0   3925    9816

      Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
        50%   3925
        66%   4028
        75%   4117
        80%   4184
        90%   4353
        95%   4525
        98%   4798
        99%   5023
      100%   9816 (longest request)

    13. Re:Abnormally? by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      Isn't that basically what Rob's doing by posting this?

      --- Mr. DOS

    14. Re:Abnormally? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Works on Leopard :)

    15. Re:Abnormally? by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      You're telling me I just put ABBY-NORMAL CODE IN A GIANT SET OF 18 2x QUAD-CORE SERVERS!

  9. L8r D00dz by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm off to ride the new iron!

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:L8r D00dz by maxume · · Score: 1

      Don't hurt yourself.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  10. Tracerouted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    3 fewer hops to 11, latency tripled to 85ms

    1. Re:Tracerouted by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I get 10ms

    2. Re:Tracerouted by mnslinky · · Score: 2, Informative

      wow, 5 fewer hops to me, with about half the latency

    3. Re:Tracerouted by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      5 fewer for me, about 2/3 latency.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    4. Re:Tracerouted by Anubis350 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm in NYC, dropped latency rather impressively from 96ms to 36ms, dropped hops from 16 to 13, all depends on where you live and what networks your traffic is going over

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    5. Re:Tracerouted by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Same results here in the NYC suburbs (via speakeasy). Soon I'll be able to read slashdot 3 times faster!

    6. Re:Tracerouted by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      speakeasy here too :-p. Schweet, faster /. :-D

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    7. Re:Tracerouted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "$ traceroute slashdot.org
      The program 'traceroute' can be found in the following packages:
        * traceroute-nanog
        * traceroute
      Try: sudo apt-get install
      bash: traceroute: command not found"

      wow ubuntu doesn't come with traceroute...

    8. Re:Tracerouted by the_one(2) · · Score: 2, Informative

      I get 16 hops from sweden on both. latency is about 40 ms less

    9. Re:Tracerouted by bram · · Score: 2, Informative

      try mtr

      --
      People using html in email should be shot.
    10. Re:Tracerouted by zhiwenchong · · Score: 1

      Similar results from Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
      17 hops -> 12 hops
      90 ms -> 25 ms

    11. Re:Tracerouted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting -1 hops and an instant ping. You gonna mod me informative or interesting? (Because my parents are neither)

    12. Re:Tracerouted by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      It's not as if on a text based site anyone can really notice latency below a couple of hundred microseconds.

    13. Re:Tracerouted by GumphMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Latency! That ain't latency:

      • Current 14 hops 236ms
      • New 16 hops 317ms

      Figures courtesy of tracepath. The packets have paddled across the Pacific.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    14. Re:Tracerouted by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      Living in Indianapolis and trying to get to a site in Chicago, it of course makes sense that Comcast routes my traffic down to Nashville, then to New York (newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net is hop 6), then to LA (..losangelesequinix.savvis.net is hop 8), then to Chicago.

      Latency to the normal site in California is about 4 - 5 ms more than to Chicago. Go figure.

    15. Re:Tracerouted by indi0144 · · Score: 0

      old > new
      30+ (?) > 17hops
      147ms+ > 112ms
      in south America

      ...I guess I'm the lag bitch here.. time to camp [/notetoself]

    16. Re:Tracerouted by PRC+Banker · · Score: 1

      Latency averaging around 350ms for me. I am in China, packets crossing the Pacific. This is normal.

      --
      Oh.
  11. "dump"... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't explain it (oh okay, maybe I can) when the database in question contains /. comments and old Jon Katz stories (quite apart from Taco's nicely spelled and eloquent posts), calling it a dump somehow seems appropriate in the more scatological sense of that word...

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  12. you're done by amazon10x · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have access to the storm botnet. Should I try to DDoS the new data center?

    1. Re:you're done by idiotwithastick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Alternatively, we could always just try the Slashdot effect.

    2. Re:you're done by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does having your computer be a zombie node equate to "access"? ;-)

    3. Re:you're done by compro01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      so we're gonna slashdot slashdot?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  13. new account by altair1230 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I couldn't create a new account on beta.slashdot.org

    1. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAILURE MUCH

    2. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny, *mine* still works...

    3. Re:new account by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Funny, *mine* still works... Mine doesn't, but i'm not set 'willing to moderate' and my uid is in the mid range, at the middle low 6 digits.
    4. Re:new account by kesuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      okay i've tried 4 of my slashdot accounts, in opera for linux, and none of them lets me log into beta.slashdot.org...

      mine was low 6 digits..
      the rest were in the high 6 digits...

      tried with wand asking, enabled and disables, as well as 'public terminal' checked, no dice, can't log in with opera at all.

    5. Re:new account by Valtor · · Score: 1

      I was able to login with my account without any problem using Firefox 3 RC1...

      --
      "Sockets are the standard networking API, also useful for stopping your eyes from falling onto your cheeks" zeromq.org
    6. Re:new account by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Worked fine with both accounts I have. Firefox 2.0.0.11 on Windows XP SP2.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    7. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holly smokes, you hijacked my account!

    8. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also was unable to create a new account. got a server error.

    9. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you should change your password. I just guessed it.

  14. I think.... by ForestGrump · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think slashdot slashdotted themselves.

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:I think.... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Yep, same thing here.

      Internal Server Error
      The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

      Please contact the server administrator, pater@slashdot.org and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

      More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

      Apache/1.3.41 Server at beta.slashdot.org Port 80

    2. Re:I think.... by Idbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      They just wanted to coin the term: "recursive slashdotting".

  15. I got some ideas of scripts... by zukinux · · Score: 1

    using things like wget -r + ping to check how it changes with logs and stuff to check the results later
    If you got more ideas [using scripts or so] post them to me, I'd be more than happy to use my computer to check the beta :)

  16. Slashdot hardware specs... by madskyllz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM" What do you mean, "If" ?

    1. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Talen317 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean that "If I'm not curious" the system runs on some other hardware?
      Perhaps an Apple IIe?

      What if I'm curious one day but not curious the other day?
      Will that dramatically affect my user experience?

    2. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course it will. If you're not curious you're not getting anywhere close to your normal share of fun.

    3. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM

      Hereafter known as a Slashdot cluster.

    4. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      What if I'm curious one day but not curious the other day?
      Will that dramatically affect my user experience?

      YES! Slashdot runs on the Schoedinger Inc., Curiosity Wave Reaction Vessel®. If you're NOT curious slashdot will simply cease to exist. Something about curiosity killing the cat...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    5. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Talen317 · · Score: 1

      What if I'm curious one day but not curious the other day? Will that dramatically affect my user experience?

      YES! Slashdot runs on the Schoedinger Inc., Curiosity Wave Reaction Vessel®. If you're NOT curious slashdot will simply cease to exist. Something about curiosity killing the cat...

      So does this result in two separate realities, one for those who are curious and one for those who are not?
      So if I am not curious one day and then I AM curious the next, am I just jumping between the two different realities or have I created a new fork in space/time/reality?
    6. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by ChoppedBroccoli · · Score: 1

      Ok smart alics, insert witty response after this...

      and if I'm bi-curious...?

    7. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      It means "A implies B", with "A" being "you're curious" and "B" being "the site runs this and that hardware".

      It doesn't say anything about what's correct if A doesn't hold; a priori, B could be true, or it could not, but nothing's telling you.

      Do not confuse implication and equivalence: it said "if", not "iff".

    8. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Akardam · · Score: 1

      Heisenberg would like a word with you...

    9. Re:Slashdot hardware specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that "If I'm not curious" the system runs on some other hardware?
      Perhaps an Apple IIe?


      Close - the hardware originally ran like an Apple IIe but Taco removed Windows Vista.

  17. Seems recursive by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Funny

    So let me get this straight. You want us to Slashdot....Slashdot?

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Seems recursive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. they want you to /. them.

    2. Re:Seems recursive by Bovius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop it, you're freaking me out.

    3. Re:Seems recursive by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a Coral Cache link, just in case. ;)

    4. Re:Seems recursive by beamich · · Score: 1

      Oh god this is doing my head in!! HEEEELLLLPPP

    5. Re:Seems recursive by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russia,... Slashdot slashdots Slashdot. :-)

      So, here's the plan:

      1. Set up new test website for popular web forum.
      2. Announce it as a test.
      3. Encourage others to slashdot slashdot.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

    6. Re:Seems recursive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /.: /. /..

      (fuck you, filters)

    7. Re:Seems recursive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Exactly. My first thought was that this might be more dangerous than the Large Hadron Collider.

      I'm picturing the entire internet collapsing in on itself. Either that or we're looking at the genesis of Skynet.

  18. Power consumption? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM.

    What's the power consumption on this set up?

    1. Re:Power consumption? by HogGeek · · Score: 1


      I have to build a datacenter and infrastructure to "fit" in a LEEDS Platinum building, so I care!

    2. Re:Power consumption? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's the power consumption on this set up?
      Probably less than you'd expect. Intel's latest line of Quad-core Xeon processors use 45nm fab technology. If these are 2.33GHz "Harpertown" chips, then each chip (not core!) uses only ~50 watts. That means these machines could be running in as little as 150 watts for the dual processor machines, and 250 watts for the quad processor machines. (Though the quad core machines are most likely drawing a lot more power than that for a full RAID array.) Which really isn't too shabby.
    3. Re:Power consumption? by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Three puppies and a hair from CmdrTaco's head every 108 minutes.

    4. Re:Power consumption? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1, Funny

      1.21 gigawatts.

    5. Re:Power consumption? by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      What's the power consumption on this set up?


      Where do you think all those hot grits are produced? :))
    6. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The SAN will blow away the power consumption of the CPUs in any moderately sized setup. I wonder how many discs are in the Slashdot SAN?

    7. Re:Power consumption? by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now if we can just find a way to get the datacenter up to 88mph...

    8. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power consumption?

      1.21 gigawatts.


      No worries. They installed a Mr. Fusion. It runs off all the garbage that tries to pass for enlightened comments, plus Cowboy Neil's old socks.
    9. Re:Power consumption? by linuxpyro · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would explain the dupes.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    10. Re:Power consumption? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Put on the truck and run on the area toll roads.

    11. Re:Power consumption? by legoman666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And that's only if they're at 100% load, which they won't be except in rare cases.

    12. Re:Power consumption? by Mastadex · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      1.21 Gigawatz

      If I didn't say it, who would?

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    13. Re:Power consumption? by hey · · Score: 1

      I don't think they did any market research in Canada when they used the name "Harpertown".

    14. Re:Power consumption? by zdzichu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is /.. If there were 2.33 chips they would write 2.33. 2.3 GHz clearly show it's Barcelona Opteron. They've TDP of 137W (or 74W in case of High Efficiency chips).

      --
      :wq
    15. Re:Power consumption? by afidel · · Score: 1

      If the webservers are anything like our HP BL406c's blades then about 3kva for the webservers. For the DB servers if they are single quad core the probably around three hundred watts each with a decent amount of disks onboard. This is with moderate use, slashdot probably has bigger peak load so maybe increase those numbers 40% for more heavily loaded CPU's and disk.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Power consumption? by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Anyone could look those specs up on Intel's site. What about the TOTAL power consumption including power supplies, cooling, hard drives, etc

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    17. Re:Power consumption? by omnipresentbob · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're all quad core machines. 18 of 'em have 2 quad core processors, and the other 4 lack the extra processor but get more RAM.

      It's sorta like, there's 22 guys. 18 of 'em ain't missing nothing, but the other four only have one nut but have more endurance. Though the analogy is a bit off.

    18. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yawn. CPU power is a small fraction of overall data center power costs.

    19. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though the quad core machines are most likely drawing a lot more power than that for a full RAID array. Redundant Array of Inexpensive/Independent Drives Array? What is this newfangled technology of which you speak?

  19. I'm in downtown Chicago right now by lpangelrob · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want me to try to walk out with your servers, just post the address. I'll let you know if I'm successful, but odds are you'll know long before then...

    1. Re:I'm in downtown Chicago right now by cmacb · · Score: 1

      And furthermore, more background on the reasons for the move would be fun. For example, do you have some inside information about California that we could all use? There has been quite a bit of earthquake activity around the world lately.

    2. Re:I'm in downtown Chicago right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its at 1060 West Addison #1.

      Don't forget to take anything you find.....

    3. Re:I'm in downtown Chicago right now by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Nice try, Jake and Elwood.

  20. Not a problem by dedazo · · Score: 2, Funny

    18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM.

    twitter will create a few more sockpuppets and bring this rig to its rack-mounted knees.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  21. ey, you need insurance? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    Vinnie and Rocco, here, they do a good job for the others in the neighborhood. shame to have anybody run any of them viruses or whatever on ya. we can work somethin' out.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  22. Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nearly as powerful as my CS server...

  23. More info about the hardware? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AMD or INTEL?

    What is the raid setup?

    Hardware raid? raid 5? raid 6? raid 50? others?

    SAS? scsi?

    MB chipset?

    How are they linked to each other Dual or more teamed gig-e

    10 gig-e?

    others?

    1. Re:More info about the hardware? by Precision · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the Web servers, the specs are

      Dual Quad Core Intel E5345 with RAID 1 of 2xSATA drives

      On the Database boxes

      Single Quad Core Intel E5345 with RAID 5 of 7xSAS drives w/ a hot spare

      All machines are 2xGigE connected to cabinet switches which are 10G connected to our cores and our Dual 10G uplinks

      --
      - U
    2. Re:More info about the hardware? by felipekk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, what version of IIS are they running?

      And SQL 2008 I suppose?

      *hides*

    3. Re:More info about the hardware? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Why 7 disks and only raid 5 and not raid 6?

      on the Database is that a hardware raid card?

    4. Re:More info about the hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to second this... details please!

    5. Re:More info about the hardware? by Precision · · Score: 1

      Yes, all machines have hardware RAID cards, even the webservers. The reason for RAID 5 vs 6 was purely a performance thing. Some sites choose to use RAID 10, some RAID 5+spare.

      --
      - U
    6. Re:More info about the hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I guess more than half of the folks who come in here have more servers than that, better than these configs and more bandwidth in their basements...
       
        Well, on my side, I do!

    7. Re:More info about the hardware? by roblarky · · Score: 0

      It's called Personal Web Server:
      http://www.coveryourasp.com/PWS.asp

    8. Re:More info about the hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any reason for not using a SAN

    9. Re:More info about the hardware? by allscan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only dual 10G uplinks?

    10. Re:More info about the hardware? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Single Quad Core Intel E5345 with RAID 5 of 7xSAS drives w/ a hot spare

      Seems like an poor choice of disk configuration for a database server. Or do these database servers not see a lot of writes ?

      Bit surprising you didn't get more RAM, either, seeing its so cheap. We basically don't buy boxes with less than 16G now.

    11. Re:More info about the hardware? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Seems like an poor choice of disk configuration for a database server. Or do these database servers not see a lot of writes ?

      RAID 5 is perfectly fine for database servers, presuming you don't want to piss-away 1/2 of your storage in a RAID 10 arrangement. Checksum calculations are largely a non-issue with hardware RAID.
    12. Re:More info about the hardware? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      any reason for not using a SAN

      The SAN market is currently a sucker's market, where vendors and huge-commission salespeople sell products at absurd price points.

      Not to mention that it's also a single point of failure.
    13. Re:More info about the hardware? by Deaddy · · Score: 1

      Since normally most users are readers, I guess they don't need that much write-performance, at least compared to the read-throughput.

    14. Re:More info about the hardware? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      RAID 5 is perfectly fine for database servers, presuming you don't want to piss-away 1/2 of your storage in a RAID 10 arrangement.

      RAID5 has inherently bad random write performance (*especially* when degraded). Thus, RAID5 (or similar schemes) is typically a poor choice for any remotely write-heavy DB.

      (On the other hand, read performance is great - hence my question about these particular DBs not being write-heavy - it would be a quite reasonable decision for a mostly-read DB).

      Checksum calculations are largely a non-issue with hardware RAID.

      No "hardware RAID" can escape the extra physical IOs RAID5 requires.

    15. Re:More info about the hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most SANs have shelves of disks with two data connections, each passing thru two controllers that keep track of ongoing IO.
      So if either loop, or controller were to fail it wouldn't bring down the storage array.

      Some of the nice SANs even have controllers with the ability to do Active/Active instead of only Active/Passive

    16. Re:More info about the hardware? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that most db reads are people posting. The average story gets a few hundred comments, and they rarely post more than a dozen stories a day, so you're not looking at more than a few thousand writes per day. In comparison, every time someone visits the site, you're going to see a load of reads to get at all of the comments. People updating their account data probably adds a few too, but I suspect you could get enough write performance out of a 1960s teletype to satisfy Slashdot's write rate.

      Oh, and you forgot to mention the fact that the RAID 5 write hole means that a decent database server needs to do a lot more flushing / syncing on a RAID-5 setup than it does with RAID-1 or a single disk. This probably doesn't make a difference for /. since it uses MySQL which treats data integrity as an optional extra.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  24. Only on Slashdot by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    do they intentionally slashdot the beta.slashdot.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  25. What is the current hardware? by llZENll · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:What is the current hardware? by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      http://meta.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/18/1641203

      Slashdot currently has 16 web servers all of which are running Red Hat 9. Two serve static content: javascript, images, and the front page for non logged-in users. Four serve the front page to logged in users. And the remaining ten handle comment pages. All web servers are Rackable 1U servers with 2 Xeon 2.66Ghz processors, 2GB of RAM, and 2x80GB IDE hard drives. The web servers all NFS mount the NFS server, which is a Rackable 2U with 2 Xeon 2.4Ghz processors, 2GB of RAM, and 4x36GB 15K RPM SCSI drives. (CT: Just as a note, we frequently shuffle these 16 servers from one task to another to handle changes in load or performance. Next week's software story will explain in much more detail exactly what we do with those machines. Also as a note- the NFS is read-only, which was really the only safe way to use NFS around 1999 when we started doing it this way.)

      Besides the 16 web servers, we have 7 databases. They currently are all running CentOS 4. They breakdown as follows: 2 Dual Opteron 270's with 16GB RAM, 4x36GB 15K RPM SCSI Drives These are doing multiple-master replication, with one acting as Slashdot's single write-only DB, and the other acting as a reader. We have the ability to swap their functions dynamically at any time, providing an acceptable level of failover.

      2 Dual Opteron 270's with 8GB RAM, 4x36GB 15K RPM SCSI Drives These are Slashdot's reader DBs. Each derives data from a specific master database (listed above). The idea is that we can add more reader databases as we need to scale. These boxes are barely a year old now -- and still are plenty fast for our needs.

      Lastly, we have 3 Quad P3 Xeon 700Mhz with 4GB RAM, 8x36GB 10K RPM SCSI Drives which are sort of our miscellaneous 'other' boxes. They are used to host our accesslog writer, an accesslog reader, and Slashdot's search database. We need this much for accesslogs because moderation and stats require a lot of CPU time for computation.
      --
      Unpleasantries.
  26. Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 0, Troll

    Who moves from California to Chicago Illinois? I mean I understand it is cheaper out there but there IS a reason for that.

  27. WooHOO! Let's slashdot SlashDot!! by haruchai · · Score: 1


      I'm sure my lethal DoS over my 2 Meg ADSL line will
    bring your site to its knees!!!

    Mehehehahehahehahhhhhehahhhh!!!!

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:WooHOO! Let's slashdot SlashDot!! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add 127.0.0.1 to the DOS target -- that's one of Slashdot's "secret" alternate addys!!

      ! Brillia--NO CARRIER

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  28. Ah, the Data Center robbery center of America! by snarfies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How soon we forget.

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/03/2054208

    WISE choice, Slashdot. Wise choice.

    1. Re:Ah, the Data Center robbery center of America! by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points...first comment in a good while on /. that actually made me laugh.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    2. Re:Ah, the Data Center robbery center of America! by hakr89 · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're not being hosted out of CI Host, they're being hosted out of Savvis.

  29. great choice by ILuvRamen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody should have any sort of datacenter in CA cuz it's too hot and the power to cool it is too expensive. Chicago was a far better choice! Plus it's closer to Wisconsin where I live so the response time will be better. That's even more important ;)

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:great choice by houghi · · Score: 1

      What about Juneau if you still want to be in the US and have cold tenmperatures.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:great choice by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      you know how much electricity costs up there?! Then again they'd need basically no cooling and just open windows but you still have to run the servers

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    3. Re:great choice by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Juneau, Wisconsin? Still gets pretty warm there during the summer.

    4. Re:great choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wisconsin where I live

      I've got to admire your courage for going public with this.

    5. Re:great choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to tell Silicon Valley that...

    6. Re:great choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Nobody should have any sort of datacenter in CA cuz it's too hot

      You do realize most of the tech is in Northern California? Chicago gets just a a wee bit hotter than San Francisco.

    7. Re:great choice by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      It was bloody hot last weekend but now it's freezing again.

    8. Re:great choice by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Nobody should have any sort of datacenter in CA cuz it's too hot and the power to cool it is too expensive. Chicago was a far better choice! Plus it's closer to Wisconsin where I live so the response time will be better. That's even more important ;) Ditto - go Bucky!

      Now, only if they would have waited for Wisconsin's newest data center in Fitchburg to go online, it would have been even faster for me. But Chicago is just down the road - so I'll take it.
  30. Re:Just one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could well be just the cost of it. Considering the bandwidth slashdot must go through each month, there could be a serious saving.

  31. I'm sure I'm not alone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM"
    I just got an erection

    1. Re:I'm sure I'm not alone... by StarfishOne · · Score: 4, Funny

      You just gave my mind a way to fast association with "uptime"... ;o

      And to be ahead of obvious replies: has Netcraft confirmed it? :P

    2. Re:I'm sure I'm not alone... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Then you'll really get a kick out of our production financials:
      DB
      4xOperton 8220
      32GB ram
      Dual FC HBA's
      110 disk SAN
      Dual TOE ethernet

      Batch
      4xOperteron 8220
      12GB ram

      Logic
      2xOpteron 280
      12GB ram

      Citrix app servers
      8x DL360 G4p with 4GB ram and dual Xeon dual cores

      Citrix reporting servers
      17x BL460c 2x Xeon 5345 with 4GB ram
      There's a few more systems involved but that's the bulk of it =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  32. Weaker Databases? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM. I read this as "two quad-cores per webserver, and a single quad-core per database." Is this correct?

    I was always under the impression that database servers needed more CPU horsepower than webservers.
    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Weaker Databases? by bol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depending on their architecture they very well be more web server bound than DB.

      If they are more web server bound than DB I would suspect that they are using a high degree of server side caching to remove as much dependency on the database as possible. The DBs are also likely scaled out across the web servers and load balanced as well with possibly a distributed data set. This would require the front end web servers to do more work in querying the databases and displaying the results.

      For example, a mod on the article ID may determine which database that article is stored on distributing the load evenly across N database nodes.

      That combined with front end caching will give you almost unlimited scalability and is the foundation for all high traffic web sites.

    2. Re:Weaker Databases? by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      Caching lets the webservers take much of the strain from the DBs. Higher scalability that way.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    3. Re:Weaker Databases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your impression is wrong. Though of course it depends on the application in question.

      For my day job stuff the web servers are the bottle neck.

      Given that database servers tend to be highly tuned and optimised code and web front ends tend to be perl/php/ruby/python interpreted crapfests I wouldn't be surprised if that's the normal state of affairs...

    4. Re:Weaker Databases? by jpbelang · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember a USENIX talk about Altavista's servers and they had many more web servers than DB servers (like 3 to 1).

      So I'm not surprised.

      --
      JP http://www.wearerite.com
    5. Re:Weaker Databases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it really depends on the application.

      Most of the time you want your databases to have the fastest hard drives and plenty of ram, but processor usage can vary a lot. Ideally most database queries are simple lookups. The web servers could be doing a lot more of the processing with rendering the html, handling connections, generating captchas, that sort of thing.

    6. Re:Weaker Databases? by Precision · · Score: 1

      It is correct. The Databases servers can go to another Quad Core in about 15 minutes however. For the most part, at least with Slash, the Databases are more i/o bound than CPU.

      --
      - U
    7. Re:Weaker Databases? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Web servers scale better with the number of CPU cores, whereas database servers tend to scale better with the speed of each core.

    8. Re:Weaker Databases? by Bluehorn · · Score: 1

      Depends. As Slashdot is probably using some heavy scripting for the site, the web servers may well generate more load. Even more so as I guess that the database schema is quite simple compared to typical "enterprise" db applications.

      It could well be that the performance of the DB servers are mostly I/O bound.

    9. Re:Weaker Databases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people seem to think that....

      In the "real" world (as opposed to just looking at the specs) databases (simple stash n' fetch sites like slashdot and other web bloggy type stuff) are for the most part I/O bound on the storage interface (esp writes!). Even a RAID 5 7 disk array is slow in terms of moving bits to it and from it compared to say a CPU. So unless you are doing some fancy stuff to the data before you store/retrieve it (stored procedure or otherwise on the db box), storage is the bottleneck. Which is why several companies make fantastically expensive large format solid state storage arrays to speed up database access among other things. The price of these are coming down, and if you had uber fast storage then I'm sure you would need to beef up the number of cpu cores to match. I seem to recall something about the price of a SSD matching HDs in a few years on slashdot the other day. Why do you think IBM sold there HD buisness to Hitachi lock, stock and barrel? The whole concept of storing data on a PHYSICALLY moving medium is so..... 1950's if you think about it :D

      And web servers, as simple as they are, have a bit of overhead per http request, which adds up on large scale sites. You can cache your database results to some degree so you don't need to hit the db for duplicate web requests, but every web request needs a sliver of cpu juice to figure out what to do with it. Death by a hojillion paper cuts indeed.

  33. which are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... all running MS Access DB's in Windows Vista!

  34. Oblig by felipekk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new beta Slashdot overlords.

  35. Mirror Universe /. by m93 · · Score: 1

    Keep that dupe site up as a mirror universe to "our" slashdot. There, evil and conquest will reign supreme over discussion and civil discourse. Let all of our darkest thoughts and perversions run wild without editorial control! A no holds barred Darwinian process of devouring the weak will replace moderation. Women will be plentiful in this mirror universe of /. You can banish out of favor "real" slashdotters there, kind of like that movie where all the prisoners were sent to that island where they formed their own warring societies. It will be the slashdot version of Austraila!

    1. Re:Mirror Universe /. by HRbnjR · · Score: 1

      Keep that dupe site up as a mirror universe to "our" slashdot. There, evil and conquest will reign supreme over discussion and civil discourse. Let all of our darkest thoughts and perversions run wild without editorial control! A no holds barred Darwinian process of devouring the weak will replace moderation. http://www.kuro5hin.org/
  36. But ... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Oh right, another of one of these 'upgrades' where we don't get any flashy improvements. Its backend you say? How do I as an average user know for sure?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  37. Re:Just one question by marxmarv · · Score: 1

    It can't be that it's thirty minutes from everything, could it?

    I am curious. Why would they be moving? Is it just a coinkydink that SourceForge is updating their privacy policy at the same time?

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  38. Tempus Interruptus! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please, kill the 2-minute comment delay timer on beta.slashdot. We really want to test it!

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:Tempus Interruptus! by Mastadex · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other words:

      "First Post"
      Re: "First Post" - "Second Post"
      Re: Re: "Second Post" - "Third Post"
      etc...

      I know your kind.

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    2. Re:Tempus Interruptus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, kill the 2-minute comment delay timer on beta.slashdot. We really want to test it!

      Please kill the new comment listing format -- I want to continue to use my mobile device which this setup destroys.

  39. some advice .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    If those flash adverts were a little less intrusive and didn't have those anoying animations then I wouldn't feel the need to install noscript.

    On another site, they have talking adverts, I forget the name, I ain't ever going back there.

    Don't the advertisers realize that pissing people off isn't the way to sell product.

    Also, the page freezing on google-analytics.com and doubleclick.net is .. wait ... waaaaiit .... wait some more ..now why did I click on that link, what was I thinking .. never mind, on to the next site ......

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  40. Bring it on by Cracked+Pottery · · Score: 1

    So you want a king hell DDOS attack to test your new servers? Slashdot Slashdot. Let's roll.

  41. nmap dump by Al_Kane · · Score: 1
    nmap -A -T4 216.34.181.45

    Starting Nmap 4.62 ( http://nmap.org/ ) at 2008-05-23 11:54 PDT
    Interesting ports on beta.slashdot.org (216.34.181.45):
    Not shown: 1713 closed ports
    PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
    80/tcp open http Apache httpd 1.3.41 ((Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4)
    443/tcp open ssl/http Apache httpd 1.3.41 ((Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4)
    Device type: PBX|general purpose
    Running (JUST GUESSING) : Vodavi embedded (86%), FreeBSD 6.X (85%)
    Aggressive OS guesses: Vodavi XTS-IP PBX (86%), FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE (85%)
    No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
    Uptime: 35.124 days (since Fri Apr 18 08:59:04 2008)
    Network Distance: 12 hops

    TRACEROUTE (using port 80/tcp)
    HOP RTT ADDRESS
    1 ... 12 no response
    13 67.70 beta.slashdot.org (216.34.181.45)

    OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .
    Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 214.082 seconds

  42. Re:Just one question by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0, Troll

    How about because California is full of self-important shitheads like you, who denigrate the rest of the country without even understanding it.

  43. Morbo crush your puny data center by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM. Morbo crush your puny data center with his mighty story submissions!
    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  44. Smooth Move, Rob. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    This will end up being like that 'Hack Our Box' thing that TSS did a few years ago, where no one hacked the box, but fucked up a whole bunch of other things.

    This is just asking for trouble.

  45. Test /. on a holiday weekend?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of all weekends, this may be the first weekend of 2008 to see three sunny days in a row, let alone even two. No thanks, but I'm not that dedicated of a /. lurker.

    On a side note, you may notice the absence of tests from the state of Ohio. That won't be a statistical anomaly; in fact, you can ignore that. It is indeed a rare event of the daystar emerging out of the clouds for three consecutive days. It's quite an event in this neck of the woods.

  46. slashdotted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its taking very long to load pages. the site seems to be slasdotted!!!

  47. It runs Unix by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Server:Apache/1.3.41(Unix)mod_perl/1.31-rc4

    X-Bender:That'snotmygold-plated25-pinconnector.


    Pulled from the Rex Swain's HTTP viewer site.
    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:It runs Unix by __aanjtz122 · · Score: 1

      Alas, plenty of Linux servers will report 'Unix' in such a server line.

    2. Re:It runs Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I set my Apache server to report random windows server versions so those attempting to break in will be attempting to use windows exploits against apache which hopefully have less chance of actually succeeding and/or assume it is running as a load balancer :P

  48. Employee loss by baomike · · Score: 1

    I am surprised at this, is this a way of trimming back on staff?
    I can't imagine anyone who finds Calif. at least halfway likable
    (being an Oregonian, I don't) wanting to live or go near Chicago.

    there is an old saying:
    If the pilgrims had landed in California the east coast would be a wilderness.

    1. Re:Employee loss by afidel · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of the staff lived in cali. Taco and Hemos were from Michigan and their sysadmin was likewise from the midwest. With todays tech who the heck has to be physically close to their servers anyways?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Employee loss by Precision · · Score: 1

      It's really alot more in response to the availability of space and power.

      --
      - U
  49. Re:Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 0, Troll

    Exactly what in my post was self-important? Have you ever been to Chicago during the middle of Summer? How about during the middle of Winter? My point was that California has much milder weather, is closer to so many city centers, has a varied geography that is interesting and useful for recreational activities and we have a functional beach. You might want to take some of these into consideration when you choose where to live.

  50. Sure, I'll help! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    I'll just post this to Digg :-)

  51. Re:Just one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's power, and cooling, and space.

    Most of the DC's in CA are at capacity, if not above, if you're looking for racks and racks of equipment. For example, Google and Microsoft have first right of refusal for either their servers (search or xbox live).

    I know that a few other companies are looking at either supplementing their CA rackspace with rackspace in Chicago.

  52. Best of luck, by hwyengr · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Best of luck, by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      This being Slashdot, it's more likely to be at 39th and Vincennes.

      Stupid Google censorship ruined my joke. IT WAS A DRUG DEAL!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Best of luck, by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

      Phenomenal. Street View can also now confirm what I suspected all along; Indiana is just a black hole.

      I wonder what the cooling properties are in there?

  53. Im in ur slashdot, postin commenz by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Chicago!
     
      For those asking why not California, lots of good internet structure here (those heavy usage financial firms have data centers here for a reason)

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:Im in ur slashdot, postin commenz by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      Also, Barack Obama

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
  54. Will it Blend? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

    Will it Blend?

  55. Cluster by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

    Yes but is it a Beowulf cluster?

  56. Which data center? by qBardq · · Score: 1

    The company I work for also has servers at a data center in the Chicago area. Which one are you in?

    Are you my neighbor? :)

  57. Re:Just one question by Omestes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then why do you guys keep moving to my state, and messing it up?

    We have no beaches, we have 2 cities, the weather is NEVER mild, but yet we have an endless stream of Californians coming to to mess everything up.

    Living in AZ, sometimes I wonder if Californians are like locusts, they all swarmed to CA, killed it, and now have to move on to somewhere else.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  58. You picked a horrible location, Taco. by Khyber · · Score: 0

    Chicago has far less available bandwidth than California. Also, your new servers are already running slower than these old ones. That's bad if we can Slashdot you. Perhaps you should just stick to what works?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:You picked a horrible location, Taco. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Sorry but Chicago sits on like half the cross-continental backbone, I don't think they are hurting for bandwidth, they mentioned dual 10G uplinks, that's plenty for most apps other than streaming video.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:You picked a horrible location, Taco. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Chicago does not sit on half the cross-continental backbone and most internet traffic services only have one router listing for the Chicago area. St. Louis sits on more bandwidth than Chicago.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:You picked a horrible location, Taco. by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Chicago does not sit on half the cross-continental backbone and most internet traffic services only have one router listing for the Chicago area.
      St. Louis sits on more bandwidth than Chicago. Many private and public networks converge in Chicago... the pipes running north to Madison, Milwaukee, and Minneapolis are very large, as are the pipes going to Saint Louis and all points west... then you also have a major pipeline heading in from the east coast.

      The concept of a singular backbone in this day and age is simply not accurate, Chicago has a very robust internet connection - as large as L.A.? Who knows... but it's got fiber heading in many more directions and is much more central in the U.S. than L.A. is.
    4. Re:You picked a horrible location, Taco. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Far more networks converge in Memphis, since it's THE transportation hub of the country, you need massive logistical support. Chicago PALES in comparison as far as access to backbones goes.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  59. AWESOME [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  60. To Words: Uriah Rocks! by bangzilla · · Score: 1

    Nice work!

    --
    Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
    1. Re:To Words: Uriah Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats from me two!

  61. Down Already! by Shuh · · Score: 1

    Should have bought a Mac!



  62. Dropping connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ab -n 10000 -c 10 http://beta.slashdot.org/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev apache-2.0
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

    Benchmarking beta.slashdot.org (be patient)
    apr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (104)
    Total of 144 requests completed

    1. Re:Dropping connections by Niklas+Ohlsson · · Score: 1

      I got the same message when I ran it on two different machine at two different locations. The tests were aborted at the same time, twice. Completed 4617 requests, 5083, 980 and ~500.

  63. Down or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While slashdotting slashdot, keep an eye on this: http://www.downornot.com/beta.slashdot.org

  64. Aha. The old fractal compression trick by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1
    (which is why CmdrTaco doesn't mention disk capacity - it's all stored on an old USB memory stick) - with CowboyNeal being the grad student...

    Andy

  65. Re:Just one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your a moron. San Diego aint shit compared to Chicago. Chicago is a real metropolis compared to San Dirego and even the city (more like a big suburb) LA.

  66. Pictures? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some pictures of the new setup would be great.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some pictures of the new setup would be great.


      Hell, I want a Slashdot server webcam. *drools at the thought*

  67. Re:Just one question by Hatta · · Score: 1

    That works out well. We don't want you in the midwest anyway.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  68. Search still broken by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Unlike the slashdot.org search which redirects to google (good choice,really), the beta site attempts the slash search which is still broken. (Returns no Story results for "Tassie", which is right there on the main beta page.)

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  69. Re:Just one question by Vancorps · · Score: 1

    Hey I don't mind, a lot of those Californians brought them bandwidth which we get to enjoy. I have servers at two facilities here in AZ and really all the bandwidth available to me that I can shake a stick at.

  70. Re:Just one question by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Locusts know when their home is about to fall into the ocean*. So maybe they're on to something.

    *No idea if locusts know that, but it fits my metaphor.

  71. Re:Just one question by sharpone · · Score: 1

    Exactly what in my post was self-important? Have you ever been to Chicago during the middle of Summer? How about during the middle of Winter? My point was that California has much milder weather, is closer to so many city centers, has a varied geography that is interesting and useful for recreational activities and we have a functional beach. You might want to take some of these into consideration when you choose where to live.

    If you've worked in a datacenter as I have and do, you know that the weather is always the same inside the datacenter, as is the lighting, and generally the sound. Day runs to night runs to day. Its always the same. Generally when I make a trip to the datacenter, there is no time for recreation anyway, so none of that matters.

    In seriousness, my employer is also going to be moving out of a California datacenter in 2008, likely to Chicago or Dallas. Reasons for /. are probably similar to ours:

    • 1) Cost of power. California's power is lined with platinum or something because they charge 3 arms and 2 legs for it.
    • 2) Chicago is arguably more wired than even the bay area in terms of Tier1 and large Tier2 carriers, translation is (hopefully) less hops to your customer. I'm still not really convinced of this myself.. as most Network Operators know, in the wily world of AS to AS (eBGP) routing, geography means very little.. For example, I route through XO to LA where XO peers w/ Savvis, to get back up to Savvis in Chicago (beta.slashdot.org), even though I know for a fact that XO is peered with Savvis in Chicago too.
    • 3) Perhaps Chicago is less suseptible to natural disasters, etc.

    I'm leaning on #1 as being most likely. Better power grid, cheaper power. Lower cost, higher profit. Same reason we are looking..

  72. It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Been to California (4 weeks), New York (7 years), and Chicago (2 weeks). The pizza in California sux. NYC is better, but I think Chicago gets the nod. Good move Slashdot!

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    1. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Best Pizza I have ever had was in Athens Greece, and yes I have been to Italy a few times now.

    2. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there was some sort of kitchen that specialized in Californian pizza.

    3. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago-style Pizza is for idiots. It has a thicker, breadier crust to accomodate all the toppings which are piled on, but if you want to eat bread with toppings, why not just get a sandwich? Californian pizza is likewise all about the toppings, putting a smaller, but stranger array of toppings on a tasteless super-thin crust. New York style is the only way to go, thick enough that it's got a good flavor, but thin enough that it's not just bread with toppings.

    4. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Best pizza I've eaten in the US was in Salt Lake City. If you're ever in that part of the world, try Wasatch Pizza - it makes up for the weather, pollution, and proximity of SCO.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      You're killing me, man... Chicago-style is a pizza pie. A deep pie crust to hold the wonderful goodness inside! MMmmmm

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    6. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the 'stranger toppings' that bugs me about California pizza. Avocado, tofu & organic sea salt? Puhleeze!

      --
      - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    7. Re:It's all about the Pizza, isn't it? by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

      Poor bastard - SCO? Get any on ya?

      --
      - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
  73. I was just testing by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    ; DROP DATABASE--

  74. RSS by aram535 · · Score: 1

    Is there a new RSS site too?

  75. Can't log in using Opera by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't log in to the new site using Opera. IE works just fine. But with Opera, the system returns me to the screen it should, but not logged in. The login doesn't work in any access technique -- main page, sidebar, even the Ajax-y popup thing.

    It's validating, because if I use invalid data, I get "Danger Will Robinson!" But if I use my actual login/pwd, it silently fails.

    I'm not about to create a Sourceforge account just for this, though... I suspect they'll find enough bugs without my direct help.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Can't log in using Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you set Opera to check for new pages every time in preferences? Annoying default setting it has, to only check for new pages periodically, even after something like logins and other stuff.

  76. Comcast Routes are Screwy by slifox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live just south of the loop (downtown Chicago). Using Comcast cable, I get routed to Boston, back to Chicago, then to New York, then back to Elk Grove (near Chicago)!

    Comcast from a suburb just north of Chicago does nearly the same thing:
        Chicago, to Chartford CT, back to Chicago, to New York Savvis, then to Elk Grove, and finally to beta.slashdot.org.

    That doesn't make a whole lot of sense... Who the hell setup Comcast's routing??

    For comparison, on the Illinois Century Network (an Internet2-capable ISP for many universities and research labs), I get routed through Chicago Cogentco, then right to Chicago Savvis, and finally to beta.slashdot.org

    Can anyone explain Comcast's weird routes?

  77. Re:Just one question by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

    It's probably cheaper much like our houses here and cost of living is to you. You have a $500,000 2000 sq foot ranch while we can buy a 3,500 two story for the same price. The winters are cold but the summers are humid and hot. We have all 4 seasons.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  78. SEO by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

    Google is going to kill you with SEO for having duplicate content on that sub domain, even though you're pagerank on this site is through the roof.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    1. Re:SEO by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I strongly suspect enough Googlers read Slashdot for it to get some special cases in their system if anything goes wrong. If anything, I'd welcome Google being a bit less aggressive at indexing Slashdot - the last few times I've wanted to look up a term used in a /. post, the post mentioning it has been the top hit. I wonder how long it will take this one to show up for 'yoyodyne frobnicator'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:SEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yet, but it won't surprise you that 2 of the 4 hits for "yoyodyne frobnicator" are right here!

  79. Re:Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Ok but That arrangement will fit in one 42U rack and there are free racks at Intelenet just down the street besides CalPop and Technicolor. So I'm pretty sure that wasn't the reason.

  80. Re:Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Wow, don't take it personally dawg. Just back away from the gun...

  81. Re:Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Yes it does cost more to live here and that sucks. Luckily this housing crisis hit and housing prices are coming down. It's a good thing really. The thing is I like that while we have all four seasons here in California too most places never get colder then 45 degrees in the winter and when it's hot it's almost never humid. Personally I can't stand the humidity.

  82. Re:Just one question by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1
    This part of your post was self-important:

    Who moves from California to Chicago Illinois? I mean I understand it is cheaper out there but there IS a reason for that.
  83. Re:Just one question by ari_j · · Score: 1

    California would be the best state in the Union if it were entirely unpopulated. Beaches, mountains, rivers, etc. Just way too many Californians for my taste.

  84. Re:Just one question by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Wow, what an informative post!

  85. known issue by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

    not really an issue

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:known issue by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      sorry, meant to type, i get mod privileges in beta, but not regular. what's the deal?

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
  86. Does this mean I'll no longer have to wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later."

  87. Really? You should move here... by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 1

    Humidity's below 20 percent most of the time, it's cooler than 80F more than 360 days a year, housing prices are relatively inexpensive, and the views are spectacular! /Fairbanks, Alaska

  88. Sigh, a comment on your server shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your carbon footprint for your servers - are you green enough?

    BTW: thanks for being so courteous to newbies ;-(

  89. Subject OS by troll · · Score: 1

    OpenBSD is a stable system. I ran it for a few months, but went back to Linux because I wanted to get back into the bleeding edge with its crashes, hangs.
    OpenBSD served me well and I would not hesitate to recommend it to anyone desiring a stable, secure (except for the bug lately) system (read: business users) that doesn't crash.

    --
    Official Pi Ambassador -- inquire for details!
  90. IPv6 please by ptudor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you please start listening on a v6 address?

  91. But will it blend? by hlt32 · · Score: 1

    But will it blend? ^_^

    --
    à_à
  92. Can't log in by rips123 · · Score: 1

    I can't log in! If I type the wrong password it tells me. If I type the right one, it still says "log in" on the top bar. Firefox 3.0b5/Ubuntu

    1. Re:Can't log in by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      same here. login on auto on this server, but no-go at all on the beta site

      plus, they have that awful topic/indent thing happening again over there.

  93. but are they B3 stepping? by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    Someone script something that will make slashcode context switch really quickly. Gotta make sure that TLB bug is nailed.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  94. Re:Just one question by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    Texas already has locusts; and the locals are losing the Darwinian contest to the Californians.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  95. Apache/1.3.41??? by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Why does ab return Apache/1.3.41 instead of something... well a little newer? Is the slashdot server really running on this?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Apache/1.3.41??? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Does 2.x do mod_perl yet?

  96. Nevermind that server, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone appears to have flubbed the footer.

    Either that or it's the best fortune ever on all of the pages.

    Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir

  97. Is this going to be in the new Stargate facility? by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

    I lease a server from them and they're moving me into the new data center next week. Exciting stuff!

    --
    Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
  98. You lost me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM."



    Seriously? Does anyone here even understand what all that techno-jargon means?

  99. root password by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

    Or maybe abnormally- run crawlers, write poll spamming robots or something. What's the root password then? :)
    --
    No sig for now.
  100. Thats fine and dandy but by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...will we be getting I helped test Slashdot t-shirts?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  101. Dayum! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM. That's some SERIOUS power! I bet they could go from POST to a loaded Vista desktop in under 5 minutes! :O
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  102. I kindly signed you up.. by slashmojo · · Score: 1

    for a monitoring account here..

    http://www.servermojo.com/view/slashdot

    It will show the down/slashdotted times (if any) straight away but we'll have to wait for the daily update to see the charts for response times, daily uptimes etc. Bet you all can't wait eh? ;)

  103. high failures for me by eneville · · Score: 0

    $ ab -n 5000 -c 5 http://beta.slashdot.org/
    This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev apache-2.0
    Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
    Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

    Benchmarking beta.slashdot.org (be patient)
    Completed 500 requests
    Completed 1000 requests
    Completed 1500 requests
    Completed 2000 requests
    Completed 2500 requests
    Completed 3000 requests
    Completed 3500 requests
    Completed 4000 requests
    Completed 4500 requests
    Finished 5000 requests

    Server Software: Apache/1.3.41
    Server Hostname: beta.slashdot.org
    Server Port: 80

    Document Path: /
    Document Length: 71365 bytes

    Concurrency Level: 5
    Time taken for tests: 1685.538664 seconds
    Complete requests: 5000
    Failed requests: 3715
          (Connect: 0, Length: 3715, Exceptions: 0)
    Write errors: 0
    Total transferred: 357671196 bytes
    HTML transferred: 355887895 bytes
    Requests per second: 2.97 [#/sec] (mean)
    Time per request: 1685.539 [ms] (mean)
    Time per request: 337.108 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
    Transfer rate: 207.23 [Kbytes/sec] received

    Connection Times (ms)
                                min mean[+/-sd] median max
    Connect: 111 231 523.0 137 9163
    Processing: 857 1452 518.7 1347 7750
    Waiting: 133 213 177.1 184 6685
    Total: 1008 1684 737.6 1504 12390

    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
        50% 1504
        66% 1567
        75% 1619
        80% 1659
        90% 1930
        95% 3568
        98% 4470
        99% 4654
      100% 12390 (longest request)
    ed@ed-desktop:~$