Lenina Huxley: That is correct, money is out-moded. All transactions are through code.
John Spartan: All right, so he can't buy food or a place to stay for the night. And, it would be a waste of time to mug somebody. Unless he rips off somebody's hand, and let's hope he doesn't figure that one out.
Even with my recent T-Mobile re-contracting, I made sure to make changes to their contract, which I had their customer retention and sales department approve.
I sure hope you didn't miss the part where they say "reserves the right to change terms and conditions at any time". Oops?
DeBeers. They have the world's monopoly on diamonds and are quick to buyoff any new mines and ventures to control the supply. They are shitting bricks(diamonds?) and spending millions into detecting the ever more sophisticated synthetic diamonds. With all the effort they force on you to make the "perfect" diamond it will cost more than just buying one from them.
I didn't think so either, but then I went to winki. In my search I ended up rollyoing and swicking. Sure it's not like lexxing but it sure beats having to clusty. But then again nothing beats a good old-fashioned google.
Well he is right. To leverage the multiple cores you have to write concurrent programs. Soon there will be 4, 8, 16 cores on a cpu. And who will be doing the hard work? That's right the programmers. Writing a concurrent program is anything but simple. You have to worry about a whole new range of problems like livelocks, deadlocks, etc. And it's harder to test as well. You can test the crap out of your program and still find unexplained behaviour when you deploy.
A better solution might be some kind of fingerprint reader that generates digitally signed "proof of life" which can be demanded by remote sites
The random confirmation images seem to do a good job, although they are a nightmare for usability. Imagine a blind person having to enter the contents of an image... Also don't forget that unlike passwords, fingerprints are not very easily changed.
You're reading/. and you happen to come to an article that is mostly correct. However, it is missing a crucial piece of information without which the context of the post makes no sense. You mod it up because you watched these other shows by this Ridley Scott but have no clue what this article has to do with Blade Runner. You have just been Voight-Kampffed.
Lets say the ISPs decide to start degrading performance of servers that aren't willing to pay up. How exactly do they accomplish this? Isn't the core idea of TCP to not let anyone use bandwidth of a node more than anyone else? Or are they thinking on the level of peering agreements? (any BGP experts around?)
There is a review of it back in 2000: "Rather well, as it ends up: better than any Linux to date, including Red Hat Linux." I personally never heard of it back then or since then.
Slashdot Mirror
Tesla roadster article.
"So you think my money is counterfeit? I'm a counterfeiter as well?? You are sending me to jail for 40 years? Ah well."
Lenina Huxley: That is correct, money is out-moded. All transactions are through code.
John Spartan: All right, so he can't buy food or a place to stay for the night. And, it would be a waste of time to mug somebody. Unless he rips off somebody's hand, and let's hope he doesn't figure that one out.
I would just gank the mirror. But that's just me.
DeBeers. They have the world's monopoly on diamonds and are quick to buyoff any new mines and ventures to control the supply. They are shitting bricks(diamonds?) and spending millions into detecting the ever more sophisticated synthetic diamonds. With all the effort they force on you to make the "perfect" diamond it will cost more than just buying one from them.
I didn't think so either, but then I went to winki. In my search I ended up rollyoing and swicking. Sure it's not like lexxing but it sure beats having to clusty. But then again nothing beats a good old-fashioned google.
Tell that to this guy.
Damn kid. Probably copied it. They're all alike.
Well he is right. To leverage the multiple cores you have to write concurrent programs. Soon there will be 4, 8, 16 cores on a cpu. And who will be doing the hard work? That's right the programmers. Writing a concurrent program is anything but simple. You have to worry about a whole new range of problems like livelocks, deadlocks, etc. And it's harder to test as well. You can test the crap out of your program and still find unexplained behaviour when you deploy.
Or they might sue, which I think is the real incentive.
Hey Google isn't a frickin truck with frickin series of tubes attached to its head..
"Honey, what is this redlight district?"
You're reading /. and you happen to come to an article that is mostly correct. However, it is missing a crucial piece of information without which the context of the post makes no sense. You mod it up because you watched these other shows by this Ridley Scott but have no clue what this article has to do with Blade Runner. You have just been Voight-Kampffed.
...crickets with frickin lasers attached to their heads!
see moonwalk.
I use mplayer-plugin on my nix box. Don't think they have a windows port though.
Lets say the ISPs decide to start degrading performance of servers that aren't willing to pay up. How exactly do they accomplish this? Isn't the core idea of TCP to not let anyone use bandwidth of a node more than anyone else? Or are they thinking on the level of peering agreements? (any BGP experts around?)
It is called a cruise missile.
Mines already can distinguish between the two. Combatants know better than go where they are deployed. Good luck telling that to your children.
"The only safe windows box is one that has no connection to the internet."
Sorry, under USC 195843 sec. 398 this is illegal.
There is a review of it back in 2000: "Rather well, as it ends up: better than any Linux to date, including Red Hat Linux." I personally never heard of it back then or since then.