Not even 1 million. Think about all that text. I'm sure you could compress the hell out of all that data and you would be able to store it. Why would they store raw data when they could compress it down?
I bet they are able to Tap connections and peer into what people are talking about if they have the capability to monitor the raw traffic being sent.
If it's an option they have then I'm sure some sysadmin or tech guys is going to be using it.
Yeah, I totally agree. AOL would only change its stance if they thought they might have some customers leave or prevent some customers from joining their service.
AOL must know that no Slashdot reader is an AOL customer, eh, well I hope not:)
That's why I doubt/. was the motivating factor. Maybe in the event CNet, CNN, Etc or something linking to a slashdot story where we get wider coverage to AOL customers.
I think this is pretty standard practice for any company. Like contract negotiation without negotiation with anyone. The company can construct a totally one-sided contract that people hardly ever read and just accept.
Once and a while people call BS and they might make an adjustment.
Yeah, I checked many cached pages and could not duplicate the results even on Google own pages. I think what happed was that they created a pages and then removed or updated the content and the title no longer reflects the contents that where cached originally.
I think this is actually handy. Google is simply altering the title "with the keywords you searched for". So that you can see the Google cache page in your title bar without seeing "Google cache", blah.
I don't see this as anything sneaky just something to help people. Why would Google want to alter the page rank of a cached page anyways?
Seems like a post to grab some hits on http://www.threadwatch.org/
On musiclub.web.cern.ch/musiclub/bands/cernettes/ there was a large 57MB Real Player RM file that will probably get/.'ed so I created a torrent.
HERE is the TORRENT
LHCLive.rm
Peace
Not sure what you problem is but that link works.. Try it again.. I think mirrordot was still mirroring the content on their servers and you might have hit it while the process was still going.
Slashdot Mirror
To lighten the load on the /. image server here is a torrent of the MP3 file.
mitchell_baker_interview_cut.torrent
Not even 1 million. Think about all that text. I'm sure you could compress the hell out of all that data and you would be able to store it. Why would they store raw data when they could compress it down? I bet they are able to Tap connections and peer into what people are talking about if they have the capability to monitor the raw traffic being sent. If it's an option they have then I'm sure some sysadmin or tech guys is going to be using it.
Yeah, I totally agree. AOL would only change its stance if they thought they might have some customers leave or prevent some customers from joining their service. AOL must know that no Slashdot reader is an AOL customer, eh, well I hope not :)
That's why I doubt /. was the motivating factor. Maybe in the event CNet, CNN, Etc or something linking to a slashdot story where we get wider coverage to AOL customers.
I think this is pretty standard practice for any company. Like contract negotiation without negotiation with anyone. The company can construct a totally one-sided contract that people hardly ever read and just accept.
Once and a while people call BS and they might make an adjustment.
Yeah, you are correct. My bad.
Yeah, I checked many cached pages and could not duplicate the results even on Google own pages. I think what happed was that they created a pages and then removed or updated the content and the title no longer reflects the contents that where cached originally.
See: Searched for Google AdI think this is actually handy. Google is simply altering the title "with the keywords you searched for". So that you can see the Google cache page in your title bar without seeing "Google cache", blah.
I don't see this as anything sneaky just something to help people. Why would Google want to alter the page rank of a cached page anyways?
Seems like a post to grab some hits on http://www.threadwatch.org/
Lame
Sure, I get the idea. I just wanted to mirror the conent so when 10,000 people hit the site all wanting to listen we all can.
Here is a torrent of the Full PodCast. It's 20MB.
bsg_ep109_FULL.torrentwhoops.. here is the torrent... 18MB..
heh, here is
18MB video of the dartmail :)
MP3tunes purchase and loading MP3s to MP3beamer - 10:18 mins
Mpeg Low-Res - 43.5MB
Mpeg High-Res - 60 MB
iTunes streaming, Home Stereo use - 10:39 mins
Mpeg Low-Res - 40MB
Mpeg High-Res - 55MB
iTunes syncing, iPod loading, PDA playback - 11:30 mins
Mpeg Low-Res- 39MB
Mpeg High-Res - 49MB
Here is a torrent of the prime number.. it's 25MB..
:)
M42.torrent
Some good times testing bandwidth
Here is a 10MB torrent of an Animation from the acticle.
SolarTower-Metric-Short.mpg.torrentHere is a torrent of the Geek Girls :P
Geek GirlsPeace
Looks like this torrent is of three girls :) YEAH!
On musiclub.web.cern.ch/musiclub/bands/cernettes/ there was a large 57MB Real Player RM file that will probably get /.'ed so I created a torrent.
HERE is the TORRENT
LHCLive.rm
Peace
here is a mirror http://mirrordot.org/stories/63d72f637743d71a6cfd0 1e6d95be129/index.html
Not sure what you problem is but that link works.. Try it again.. I think mirrordot was still mirroring the content on their servers and you might have hit it while the process was still going.
Here is a mirror http://mirrordot.org/stories/94956edfe592d87195c41 25ea9151084/index.html