Slashdot Mirror


MP3beamer Released

An anonymous reader writes "MP3tunes, Michael Robertson's new music venture, has released a snazzy linux music appliance called MP3beamer. The $399 box auto-rips CDs and imports MP3s and then connects to iTunes, Java devices, media receivers, web devices even WinCE units with handy feature to "sync" songs from server to remote machine for offline playback not just streaming - see screenshots. Last time Robertson launched something with "Beam" in the name it led to avalanche of lawsuits and more then $150MM in legal payments with BeamIt from the old MP3.com." It'd be excellent to get a review of one of these machines; looks like a good one.

191 comments

  1. Very interesting concept by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...until you realize it costs four hundred dollars. I'll stick to iTunes, thanks.

    1. Re:Very interesting concept by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having your music on one box might be appealing to some - heck, it is to me. Part os it is I dont want to keep a 550 watt machine going solely got music streaming - it does make a dent in your electric bill. It appears to be pretty portable too - if the functionality is as expected this will be a hot seller IMO.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    2. Re:Very interesting concept by sabernet · · Score: 5, Funny

      But according to Napster, iTunes can cost you 10,000$!!

    3. Re:Very interesting concept by tdemark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not that I don't agree with you, but you do realize that the specs for a power supply list how much power it _can_ supply, not how much it _does_ supply at any given point?

      For example, the server that I use for development, storage, MP3, SMTP, IMAP, HTTP, SMB, etc is an AMD 2600 with two (2) 200GB 7200 RPM drives and 1 GB RAM.

      Even though it has a 400W power supply, I've measured that it uses 140W.

      Regardless, your point still stands as the server costs about $15 / mo to run.

    4. Re:Very interesting concept by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for this link. I did measure various components of my homebrew PC, but never thought of using a commercial outlet meter on it. I need to check that out. No matter what, I got a 3.0 GHz CPU and 9 fans - I know I'm leaking fuel out of it!

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    5. Re:Very interesting concept by micolous · · Score: 1

      I built a similar box (concept-wise) from spare parts laying around. I ended up with a Pentium 133, with 16 MB RAM, 6GB HDD (I don't have a lot of music), ISA soundcard (there was no onboard soundcard) and PCI network card. It runs Debian Linux, and uses mpd to do the work. It boots up in about two minutes to ncmpc, a client to mpd. It plays music rather nicely, and can live in the living room.

      On my real (much faster) server, I run phpmp2, which provides a pretty web interface to the system. Running Apache in 16 MB just died.

      While the cost of the whole thing was virtually nothing, there was time involved in setting it up. The box is a bit noisy, not terribly visually apealing, and the computer makes it impossible to watch a particular TV channel. However if you invest a bit more money or just have better spare parts laying around than I do, these shouldn't be a problem.

      --
      SSdtIGFzIGJvcmVkIGFzIHlvdSBhcmUK
    6. Re:Very interesting concept by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are worried about the electric bill, build a mini-itx based system. They can be ran off of a 60 watt power supply (some require 90) and would make a great dedicated music server. They are not powerfull enough to worry about your electric bill.....and some can be nearly silent (no fans) except for hd and cd noise.

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
    7. Re:Very interesting concept by oskard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That post was unrightfully marked flamebait. Any one who posts their negative opinion on slashdot is considered a flamer, and that's simply due to the (f)laws of civil discourse.

      But he has a point, its 400 dollars for something you can write software to do.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    8. Re:Very interesting concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can write software to do this, you can write software to do pretty much anything you want, but considering that it is alreadt done, why bother?
      If you calculate the time you spent re-inventing the wheel, you will have spent more than $400 by the time you are done with it.

      cheers!

    9. Re:Very interesting concept by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I really like that benchmark. What's the actual math, so I can apply it to my own appliances here in NYC? Is it really about $0.10:W for an always-on appliance, per power drawn from the outlet? What's the electric price per Wh (or per joule)?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  2. WOW! by j0nkatz · · Score: 5, Informative

    EVEN BETTER! It appears they are selling just the software for $70 to let you use your own machine as the "beamer" hardware. OS included!!

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
    1. Re:WOW! by mboverload · · Score: 1

      I could buy a whole computer for 200 bucks at Frys and the 70 dollar software and it would STILL be cheaper.

    2. Re:WOW! by redcircle · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about the slick looking case? newegg.com got it for only $138

    3. Re:WOW! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Maybe on Ebay, but the cheapest thing on Outpost is $279 is not nearly as nice of specs as the beamer.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:WOW! by natemc · · Score: 1

      $70 for linux... hard sell to me. No trial either to see if it blows or actually does what it says.

      For what I would want it to do I could just setup iTunes and file sharing on the spare boxen I have for free. The only upside to their package is the extra stuff that I would never use.

      iTunes has automated ripping if you turn it on.

  3. Worth a look by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reminds me of Tivo for the musically inclined. Consumers do seem to like black boxes, as long as they work right the first time. I'd look at this for myself - it would be nice to have a music only drive and dedicate one machine for that task. Four hundred is a decent price point as well.

    --
    "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    1. Re:Worth a look by gizmofan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also a software only version for $69.95. I already use a crappy old PC as a media server, I might upgrade it. I guess for you average consumer it depends how easy/difficult the setup for it is.

    2. Re:Worth a look by zackrentwood · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, it doesn't seem like it would be all that much more expensive to include a DVR card and freevo. http://freevo.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:Worth a look by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      Also a software only version for $69.95

      which is exactly what i'm looking for. my home music distribution plan is based around some sort of software amalgation like beam plus an fm transmitter card. broadcast fm around the house and never have to lay speaker wire again!

    4. Re:Worth a look by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      Buy why lose even more quality transmitting mp3's by FM radio?

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  4. Beamer? by turtled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only MP3 Beamer I can think of is the iPod for the BMW.

    Interesting, none-the-less.

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:Beamer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      its not a beamer! a bmw car is a bimmer, a beamer is a motorcycle... i'd also like to check one of these things out, i wonder if it would work well in the trunk of a car...

    2. Re:Beamer? by exley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, as soon as I saw this post on the front page, I knew there'd be someone who inappropriately started talking about BMW cars.

  5. $150MM?!? by aendeuryu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Picturing Dr. Evil, giggling and saying "Unless you give us 150 Million Million dollars!!! Mwahahaha etc. etc."

    1. Re:$150MM?!? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MM is for "million" because M is for "mthousand." It comes from the Roman Emperor Maximus who was known for having thousands.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:$150MM?!? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      I thought that it was 150 millimeters

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    3. Re:$150MM?!? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Actually, in roman numerals, MM is 2000. Notice the end of tv shows, now it would show MMV as the year for 2005.

      To my knowledge, there was no standard convention for #'s 5000 and over.

    4. Re:$150MM?!? by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1

      Actually MM is not for millimeters because the "s"s have to be lower case letters. http://physics.nist.gov/Document/sp811.pdf

    5. Re:$150MM?!? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Notice the end of tv shows, now it would show MMV as the year for 2005.

      And here I always thought that meant [Your] "Mileage May Vary", as in the show's creators thought it's good but everybody else on the planet likely thinks it stinks.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:$150MM?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... and according to your logic, 128 MB would therefore be 128 milli-bytes?

    7. Re:$150MM?!? by lysander · · Score: 1

      It's $150 of M&Ms, of course.

      --
      GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
    8. Re:$150MM?!? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of this.

      I wonder, have you ever heard of laughter it is a typical response when someone tells a joke.

      Since the "$" symbol at the beginning is used to reference money, a distance, or size measurement would not be relevant in this case since it said "$150MM" with a dollar sign ($) at the beginning.

      Remember, "Smile and the world smiles with you. Fart and you stand alone."

      Perhaps you'd benefit from a course in comedy appreciation.[/rant]

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    9. Re:$150MM?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder, have you ever heard of laughter it is a typical response when someone tells a joke.

      Yes, but laughter more frequently occurs after a joke that is actually funny.

    10. Re:$150MM?!? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      In finance terms, MM is more like "M times M," or 1000 times 1000.

      By the way, I'm a little scared that my "Roman emperor Maximus who was known for having thousands" explanation was called "Insightful." I must be new here.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    11. Re:$150MM?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it if you say it, mkay?

    12. Re:$150MM?!? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      At least link to real words

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  6. Almost perfect by Jon+Chatow · · Score: 1, Informative

    All I need is one of these that can convert on-the-fly from a native store of FLAC to MP3 or Vorbis depending on the using application. Oh, and, currenntly, an 800 GiB hard disc. *sigh* Yeah, I know, "not the target market" and all that jazz, and I'll probably get one regardless of the lack of FLAC/Vorbis, but...

    --
    James F.
    1. Re:Almost perfect by Snommis · · Score: 1

      On the money! I took the time to convert almost all my tunes to FLAC, and very few devices support it. Just goes to show that quality is not the highest priority...

      --
      Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
    2. Re:Almost perfect by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Why not just do a batch conversion once on all your flacs and then not worry about the on-the-fly? The extra disc space isn't going to be that bad...

    3. Re:Almost perfect by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That's what I did... the disc space isn't huge... but it took like 2.5 days of constant running to finish the batch :)

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  7. Auto-rips CDs? by yetdog · · Score: 0, Troll

    Unless it comes with a mechanized cd stacker/arm, there's nothing automatic about me having to drop in a single CD at a time.

    1. Re:Auto-rips CDs? by syd2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just pay a kid 10 cents per CD to drop them in the mp3beamer for you. Like Robertson himself did.

    2. Re:Auto-rips CDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you are a whiner.

    3. Re:Auto-rips CDs? by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      Correction: 20 cents per CD. Oops.

  8. Slimserver by Quixote · · Score: 5, Informative
    This appears to be an Asus Pundit with Linspire. The music server component is a hacked-up Slimserver, as clarified by Robertson himself (see link for more answers from him).

    Still, looks like a nice box.

    --
    Does MSN censor search results?

    1. Re:Slimserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...?

    2. Re:Slimserver by jhernand · · Score: 1

      It's information. Do with it what you will. I make no conclusions about it, but some people might want to know where it comes from.

    3. Re:Slimserver by Petronius · · Score: 1

      Their UI is a blattant rip off.

      --
      there's no place like ~
  9. CPU choice? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why'd they pick an expensive P4 for the box ? I would think such a utillity type box would run just fine on a celeron, or sempron type chip..

    Is all that power really nessicary ?

    1. Re:CPU choice? by LostCauz · · Score: 1

      "CPU Support: Intel Celeron-D 320 2.4Ghz Processor"

    2. Re:CPU choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      screw that a cyrix processor on a mini-itx mobo would do great.

      what is it with this desire to overpower everything in computing these days?

      A 500mhz cyrix processor on a miniitx board would do this just as well as a 4 processor Opteron motherboard with 5ghz processors.

      fools think processing power get's them anything for most tasks.

    3. Re:CPU choice? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the other poster indicated, it does run a P4-derived Celeron [as a sidenote, isn't it about time to retire the product name Celeron? It has caused confusion since the days of the Celeron 300a]. Personally I'd rather it ran a low-power processor, such as a Pentium M or Powerstep processor, or even the via processors (formerly Cyrix). A 2.4Ghz Celeron is a ridiculous power hog for something that plays MP3s. Hell I put together a fully capable full-video media player machine with a 2.4Ghz Celeron.

    4. Re:CPU choice? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      People are generally impatient. If the box takes 10 minutes to encode one MP3, nobody will want it.

    5. Re:CPU choice? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

      While it is actually a Celeron, note this benchmark of CPUs encoding MP3s.

    6. Re:CPU choice? by redcircle · · Score: 1
      Why'd they pick an expensive P4 for the box ? I would think such a utillity type box would run just fine on a celeron, or sempron type chip..

      Did you look at the machine specs? And the reason they aren't using a sempron is because Asus don't make a Pundit that uses the sempron proc.
      System specifications:
      Software
      Linspire Five-O & MP3Beamer Software

      CPU Support
      Intel Celeron-D 320 2.4Ghz Processor

      hdd
      80 Gig Hard Disk (7200 RPM)

      Memory
      256 MB Memory

      Drives
      CDRW / DVD Combo Drive
    7. Re:CPU choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't take more than a few minutes to encode a mp3 even on a 500MHz celeron. I have never had it take 10 minutes since the days of l3enc.exe on a DOS/Windows 3.11 system using an old 75MHz Pentium.

    8. Re:CPU choice? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Seeing how it has a DVD/Combo Drive, it is probably was designed to rip DVD's but legal realized to many problems.

      Plus at those speeds, it will rip in minutes as opposed say half an hour for a slower machine.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    9. Re:CPU choice? by davebytes · · Score: 1

      Actually, at some level I disagree. The Celeron gives the box some 'headroom' to expand it. With the DVI/vid outs, you can use this as quite an extensive media player if you want to. And at the pricepoint, using one of the low-power chips and chipsets would have made the unit much more expensive. This way it's pretty much 'standard components'. On another level, I'm working on an article building a VIA EPIA-M 10000 media player box using Linux, booting via inexpensive (and silent) USB devices, and pulling media off of network storage. So I agree, silence is nice. ;) But, that's meant to be hooked up to a HDTV and stereo DIRECTLY, whereas the beamer could be seen as designed to sit tucked away somewhere... -d

      --
      --- David Chait, Editor [CHAITGEAR]
  10. Direct links to 150+ MB of video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they're not using MP3Beamer as their server.

  11. And for $100 more... by sootman · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...you can get a Mac Mini to do just about all that and more. I have mine hooked up to my TV doing most of what this does, as well as playing games, showing slideshows, and ripping and playing DVDs.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:And for $100 more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but then you have to pay the apple tax... plus you have to use Mac OS (puke)

    2. Re:And for $100 more... by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      Or you can just download the mp3beamer software for $70 and stick it on whatever PC based computer you may have.

    3. Re:And for $100 more... by chill · · Score: 1

      Not quite... read the fine print.

      The $70 is for Linspire, not the beamer software -- which looks to be just a snazzied up version of LSongs.

      LSongs is free, if you want to compile from source. It is also free (and simple) if you run Linspire.

      Keep in mind, Linspire is a "family" license. Buy it once and install anywhere you want, pretty much.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:And for $100 more... by TLSPRWR · · Score: 2, Funny

      You got a mac to play games? Like... games other than Warcraft and the Apple logo puzzle?

      Please post pictures and a tutorial, I'm not sure if I believe this.

    5. Re:And for $100 more... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      What the hell are you talking about? What Apple tax?

      If you really want to, you can install linux on the bloody thing and enjoy less software and hardware compatiblity.

      Have you actually used Mac OS X? It's a *nix OS with a usable GUI.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:And for $100 more... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Yeah and UT2k3, UT2k4, Doom3, Homeworld 2, RTWC, WOW, Rise of Nations, Halo, Age of Mythology, The Sims, The Sims 2 etc.... I could go on but you are obviously a troll.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  12. Overpriced, underpowered, and dumb. by garcia · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You too can spend an exorbitant amount of money on software that is already freely available! This software package is only $70! It allows you to rip and share your MP3s all over your house just like everyone else does with Samba or built in Microsoft networking or your typical streaming MP3 server!

    You can also buy a $400 2.4 Ghz Celeron with a ridiculously small amount of RAM (256) and HD space (80GB) which includes Linspire which wants you to pay to upgrade software available for other Linux distributions FREE!

    Sorry guys, I'm sticking to my current setup that includes free software that's just as easy to use.

    1. Re:Overpriced, underpowered, and dumb. by zackrentwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure the software is available, but it doesn't set itself up. If a non-/.'er wanted to set this up they'd either have to spend a large amount of time learning linux and such, or pay a geek quite a bit of cash to make it work.

    2. Re:Overpriced, underpowered, and dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Nullsoft's Shoutcast is relatively easy to setup and I don't really know of anyone needing to setup Linux to offer up Windows Networking.

      But hey, that's me. I'm not a fucking retard like you.

    3. Re:Overpriced, underpowered, and dumb. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      This gizmo isn't for geeks like us. It's for normals who would rather spend $400 once, and have it working immediately, than spend even one second staring at a config screen. Just like the rest of their AV gear. And this PC comes with a help desk geared for music consumers, not computing users. It's the kind of thing I'd recommend to relatives who'd otherwise bug me for help all the time with the Linux/PIII I set up to do the same thing for half the price. $200 buys a lot of sanity.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  13. Finally! by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 5, Funny

    A machine you can put on autopirate and it works! A new generation of AI!

    1. Re:Finally! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well, it does have a dvdrw drive, and presumably some spare pci slots as the case lookes to be a microatx case so it could be a tivo with a dvdripper.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  14. Slimserver by jhernand · · Score: 4, Informative

    This product borrows heavily from the OSS Slimserver product, which is primarily developed for the Squeezebox and SliMP3 by http://www.slimdevices.com/Slim Devices.

  15. This is actually pretty interesting... by William_Lee · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you check out the site, they're offering the software only for around $70 which makes it a more viable solution for many of us unwilling to buy a box for $400.

    The only box that has to be running Linux is the main beamer, so you could easily work this right into an existing home M$ network.

    It even looks like you can beam your collection remotely to work.

    Also, different users can play different tunes at the same time.

    It seems pretty cool and useful at first glance.

    1. Re:This is actually pretty interesting... by Zed2K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you can download slimserver for free. Granted the $70 fee gets you linspire, but I'm willing to bet someone wanting to do this has the ability to download linux iso images and do the install themselves and for free.

    2. Re:This is actually pretty interesting... by William_Lee · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. I hesitate to admit this on /. but I'm not up on all the Linux solutions since I have fallen to the XP darkside (for gaming first and foremost).

    3. Re:This is actually pretty interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you value your time, this is a nice solution. I'm not loaded with cash, but I don't have the time to go the free route with something like this.

    4. Re:This is actually pretty interesting... by Fortun+L'Escrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you might be missing the point. simply because they have "solutions" priced at $400 and $70 does not mean they are trying to con anyone.

      there are many customers that will fork over the $400 because all the configuration is done for them and they can rely on dedicated tech support should the need arise. if they do not care for the standalone box and they only require the software then its only $70 again, the software is designed to work out of the box. no need to spend however long to configure it yourself.

      sounds like a pretty compelling argument to those consumers that do not wish to spend the time researching and configuring their boxes to "emulate" the behavior of mp3beamer.

      you acturately point out that the functionality of the mp3beamer can be achieved for "free". but just a reminder, for a true geek this functionality and more has been available for a long long time. from the time you could put up a playlist on the web to putting music on an ftp site to remote controlled streaming music and even potentially converting one's music from a lossless format to mp3 or whatever on a case by case basis.

      the point is that the mp3beamer is a convient package in the same way a pre-built desktop is a convient package. the best thing is that you could go into business offering similar "solutions" derived from similar software. you might even decide to sell your solutions at $300 and the software at $40. you might make a killing in sales on the assumption that your solutions were at the same quality or else the consumer will continue to vote elsewhere with their disposable income. anyways. im done.

    5. Re:This is actually pretty interesting... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      If double clicking a windows installer and typing in a path to your music is too complex for someone (which is all you really need to do with the windows version of slimserver) then they really need to rethink their need for a streaming server.

      I'll double click myself instead of paying someone $70 to do it for me.

  16. Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ads for nerds, stuff that doesn't really matter(exept to the advertisers)

  17. even WinCE units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    even WinCE units

    "Even" WinCE units? Since Pocket PC outnumber everything else you mention by at least a factor of 4 to 1, I think you betrayed your bias again /.

    1. Re:even WinCE units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so full of SHIT you stink.

      Palm OS still outnumbers the wince devices (yes pretendPC is still wince.)

      get a clue msft lover.

  18. re by computerme · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd rather spend $499 and get a Mac Mini...

    Infinite more software
    Infinite more customizability
    Hundreds of add ons and accessories from ipod tool makers..
    Upgradeability.
    iTunes store purchases
    Ability to wireless stream around house with the $99 Airport express...
    Plays DVDs
    Shows photos
    hooks up to iPod

    etc...

    1. Re:re by zackrentwood · · Score: 1
      Infinite more software


      Now that's not a fair claim... if nothing else this product has a processor with a turing-complete machine language.
    2. Re:re by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      But when you're talking about an appliance, you really only want it to do one thing well. Otherwise just get a decent desktop.

      That said, I have a couple of squeezeboxes connected to a slimserver, and it does what it does nicely. No muss, no fuss.

    3. Re:re by computerme · · Score: 1

      in general i agree with you but itunes (which would be the central tool used here) is best of class and of breed when it comes to MP3..

      exceptions would be ogg vorbis or other things like that 99% of people do not care about...

    4. Re:re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you have days to tinker with it. For the rest of us we just buy a beamer and be done with it.

    5. Re:re by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Mac mini is a great $499 computer until you put enough options on it to make it worth while. It's a mere $724 with a Superdrive and 80GB HDD. Want a monitor? Not included in this magic $499 price, want wireless? Keep raising the low low $499. Wow, my $499 Mac Mini is really cheap when it has features added, mine would be over $1000 with a few basic additions (512MB RAM, 80GB HDD, wireless, Monitor, DVD-RW, Airport crap). Dimension 3000 with same config (RAM, HDD, DVD-RW, Monitor) was $669. That Mac mini is sure cute.

      This is not a discount or cheap computer, it's just another expensive Mac completely stripped down so it looks cheap. At least it's not an eMac or iMac or whatever cute Volkswagon Bug-type crap Mac will try to overprice and get people who buy "cute" things to jump all over. At least they offer loans.

    6. Re:re by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll

  19. My free solution... by borawjm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I use my roomates machine to stream and store all of my music. He doesn't notice and it cost me no money.

    Did I mention that he's not very computer literate?

    1. Re:My free solution... by Snommis · · Score: 1

      Besides, the the Feds will bust HIM, while you watch and snork your Slurpee...

      --
      Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
    2. Re:My free solution... by tommyth · · Score: 1

      That worked for me until the network admins shut off his 'net connection because he was sharing.

    3. Re:My free solution... by borawjm · · Score: 1

      Haha, yeah... I can see it now..

      Feds: "Are you aware of any illegal file sharing going on around here?"
      Me: "Nope" *clears playlist* "However, my roomate has been complaining about how slow his machine has been running lately. You might want to talk to him."

  20. AAC Support by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It kinda sucks that it doesn't at least include unprotected AAC support. It seems like, outside of Apple, AAC is turning into a flop (although I know the Roku Soundbridge supports it).

    Heck, with Hymn they could even add support for iTMS files, outside of the US anyways. Not that it matters. If I wanted to change portable players I'd just find one that played unprotected AAC and run my music through Hymn myself. But there don't seem to be any options out there!

    1. Re:AAC Support by ch3 · · Score: 1

      Well, the mythmusic plugin for mythtv 0.17 supports AAC pretty well and daapd can stream aac too.

      It also seems that SlimServer (I understand that MP3Beamer is based on it) supports AAC (as well as vorbis)

    2. Re:AAC Support by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Informative

      It kinda sucks that it doesn't at least include unprotected AAC support. It seems like, outside of Apple, AAC is turning into a flop (although I know the Roku Soundbridge supports it).

      I currently run SlimServer on an old Dell Optiplex, and it supports AAC -- via re-encoding on the fly with faad2. I don't know if the Roku Soundbridge uses this method (it also uses SlimServer) or if the hardware natively supports it, but it makes sense that the MP3Beamer ALSO supports AAC via re-encoding on the fly, given that their software is based on SlimServer.

      However, setting up to re-encode on the fly is likely outside the scope of the MP3Beamer's target audience (plug in, turn on, forget about it) -- as is explaining why they can play their own AACs, but not those they download from iTunes.

      Oh, and for those considering the SlimServer/old boxen approach, I had SlimServer originally running on an old Pentium II 450 with 384mb of memory, which was also running web/mail/ssh/samba/NAT services. It could even do the re-encoding on the fly, unless someone hit a web site, at which point there'd be a slight hiccup in playback. I moved to a Pentium III 800 with 512 of memory, and now everything's peachy.

      Note: I do my listening with a Slim Devices Squeezebox, which I love. YMMV with Soundbridge, et al.

  21. Not again by LordRPI · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    All publicity is good publicity. He must want to get sued again so he can start another company.

  22. o/t but related to your sig by dknight · · Score: 1

    I'm from philly originally (sadly now live in VA) and I was very saddened to hear about the loss of Y100. I've been to 4 Feztivals and a Feastival and have 4 of the sonic sessions CDs. I always looked forwarded to hearing the station when I was in the area. Good luck getting them back!

    1. Re:o/t but related to your sig by JPM+NICK · · Score: 1

      If you are in VA or the DC area, you should check out Ron and Fez at nights on WJFK. I think they are on from 7-11. They are a very funny talk show. No music, but most of the crap on the radio is the same stuff no mater what station. They really break up the torture of a drive in traffic.

    2. Re:o/t but related to your sig by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Don & Mike! Can't get them where I am, though :(

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  23. Where's the utility? by Radi-0-head · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So why can't I do this with my existing machine and maybe an additional hard disk for storage? Oh wait, I already do!

    1. Re:Where's the utility? by arodland · · Score: 1

      It's not for you! It's for someone who just wants to be able to buy a box that has a certain feature set, and works right as soon as you plug it in. In other words, it's for the TiVo crowd, not the MythTV crowd. Nothing wrong with that.

  24. free schwag by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
    "It'd be excellent to get a review of one of these machines; looks like a good one."

    In other words, Slashdot editors want a free one to play with.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:free schwag by fbartho · · Score: 1

      free hardware is always welcome. Send me a Mac Mini, a Salina, and while you're at it, I need to write some reviews...

      --
      Gravity Sucks
  25. hmm.. side note by shadowpuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while back I noticed that iTunes has the ability to automatically rip a CD when it's put in the drive. And when it's done the CD can be automatically ejected. I'm not certain but I suspect that combined with some Applescript and a CD jukebox could be a frightenly effective combination. How much you wanna bet that programmers at Apple have already done it for themselves?

    1. Re:hmm.. side note by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      *nod*

      I personally share my music via iTunes throughout the house. While this doesnt work beyond the local subnet, theres a solution for that as well? Maybe a VPN tunnel built from my everyday or roaming location to the router/firewall at home, and booting up iTunes remotely?

      This (mp3 beamer) sounds cool, but I'm not gonna spend 400 bux for something I'm sure I can do with a little time an ingenuity. Plus, there's several set top style boxes that do similar things...

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  26. Sync to iTunes - How? by Slackrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the product FAQ, they mention an MP3Beamer Sync component that automatically syncs your iTunes collection with your MP3Beamer collection. I'm curious how they pulled this off. Does the iTunes Sharing protocol (DAAP) support file upload? Or are they pushing the music in some other way?

    1. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Possibly by using SMB? The iTunes library is, after all, just a bunch of artist/album/genre folders in your Music folder.

    2. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by digerata · · Score: 1
      ...I'm curious how they pulled this off....

      I believe it went something like this...

      vi smb.conf
      insert:
      [music]
      path = /home/music
      comment = MP3 Beamer super technology link
      browseable = yes
      writable = yes
      create mode = 0664
      directory mode = 0775
      --

      1;
    3. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      ...plus the XML library database, which is the key to the whole works. The reason iTunes works so much better for me, is because the metadata is cached in a searchable database. That's the keys to the kingdom right there.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by natrius · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't sync your iTunes collection, you stream from the server using iTunes' built-in sharing.

    5. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would be interesting to see the server do that. If they could get that to work, I would buy one.

      The only problem is that iTunes ALWAYS stores the XML library file in "My Documents" on Windows. They could probably get around this by creating(or adapting) software to sync the library. From what I have seen, the XML format is pretty easy to detangle, and could be re-created by a 3rd party program.

    6. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would be very nice. I really like the way iTunes organizes my music (I haven't even thought about the directory structure of my collection since I started using iTunes...it's simply irrelevant).

      However, iTunes is really bad about letting two computers view the same library .xml file. I think you could probably point two different computers at the same corpus of music, and have them each generate their own .xml files, but that seems like a kludge to me.

      What I think I'm going to wind up doing, to share music between my Mac, my gf's PC, and my iPod, will be to figure out a way to sync the library .xml files with one another when the libraries are not in use, and then to make sure both libraries have all the music. That way, I'll have two identical libraries (no worries about backing up), and I'll still have full functionality within iTunes.

      Sounds like a fun weekend project.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by doon · · Score: 1

      My guess is they use something like daapd. I know that is what I use at home to stream to all the macs from a FreeBSD server. Check out the project here

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    8. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Slackrat · · Score: 1
      I think it's more than that. After looking at the FAQ a little more closely, I see that you can sync your MP3Beamer music from iTunes to your iPod, which you definitely can't do from an iTunes share. However, it looks like there is some program running on the machine running iTunes that does the work of talking to iTunes on behalf of MP3Beamer.

      To quote the FAQ:


      Q: Can I use my iPod with the MP3beamer?
      A: Yes. Because you can "sync" all songs from MP3beamer to iTunes, when you plug in your iPod it will also have all the songs from MP3beamer.
      You must use iTunes to load music onto your iPod. The MP3beamer provides a program called "MP3beamer Sync" that allows you to syncronize MP3beamer with your machine running iTunes. The process for loading music on your iPod is simple:

      1. Load the music onto your MP3beamer
      2. Go to your Windows computer and launch the "MP3beamer Sync" program
      3. Click the name of your MP3beamer server
      4. Click the "Syncronize" button to copy the songs from your MP3beamer to iTunes
      5. Plug your iPod into iTunes and load music onto your iPod like you normally do
    9. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Slackrat · · Score: 1

      Based on the description of the Sync program in the FAQ (aka it runs as a client on the same machine running iTunes), I don't think it's SMB. Also, I think SMB is ultimately a no-go for shared iTunes as discussed in this BoingBoing link:

      Mac Mini Media Center Challenge

    10. Re:Sync to iTunes - How? by Otto · · Score: 1

      I'm curious how they pulled this off. Does the iTunes Sharing protocol (DAAP) support file upload? Or are they pushing the music in some other way?

      You run a client on the machine with iTunes. When you hit "Sync" in the client, it talks to the server, copies the files to the local machine, then uses iTunes COM interface to add the files into the iTunes Library.

      Basically it syncs iTunes to the server in the same basic way that the iPod can sync to iTunes.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  27. Scripts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little OT, but does anyone know where I could find a decent script to let me rip a cd to mp3 & flac, with an automatic connection to freedb to get the track names etc? I'm running Mandrake 10, and I've looked for this before with no luck.
    Thanks.

    1. Re:Scripts by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Why not just use grip? That's what I do and I am doing the same thing that you are. I figure I have to be at the computer to swap the cd's and an extra click for rip & encode isn't too much work. I do have a script that the encoder calls that does the wav -> mp3 and the wav -> flac.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:Scripts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I use abcde .

      It fetches what it can from freedb for the track info and asks you to verify it is correct with the option to adjust it.

      It is just a script calling programs, but can do (if your machine has the programs) ogg, mp3, flac, spx or mpc. All command line based, but it is fairly simple to understand (I think).
      I used it to re-rip 44 CDs to FLAC.
      It can be told to do multiple outputs in each pass, so adding a "-O mp3,flac" gave me both mp3 and flac files in the output.

    3. Re:Scripts by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      They probably are using Grip or something like it.

      Grip can be configured to auto rip and then eject.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  28. Not a troll... does it do ogg vorbis? by datastalker · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I'd prefer to have my music in a format unemcumbered by licensing fees to Thompson...

    1. Re:Not a troll... does it do ogg vorbis? by DaveInAustin · · Score: 1

      According to their FAQ, there's no ogg, nothing lossless, just mp3. A home system like this should have better formats as an option. When you export your music to a portable device, at that time, you should convert it to the necessary format. In a few years, when hard disks are 5 times as large, or when another lossy format is standard, you won't be able to decompress your mp3's back to cd-quality, or change to the new format.

      --
      --- http://davidnehme.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Not a troll... does it do ogg vorbis? by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      SlimServer does Ogg Vorbis with re-encoding to mp3 or wav on the fly, so presumably MP3Beamer might be able to as well.

      The bottom line seems to be that the end player -- not the server software -- dictates the native streams that are acceptable. For instance, my Slim Devices Squeezebox can't play AAC streams unless they're re-encoded to MP3 or WAV, but if they came out with a Squeezebox that could play AAC streams, the server software could be configured to send them without re-encoding.

  29. Uh-oh by tommyth · · Score: 1, Troll

    I built a computer that does what the MP3Beamer does, does that mean I can sue?

    This is OT, but does it seem like a high percentage of /. stories involving new technology also include a snippet about how X sued Y over frivilous object Z?

    1. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And is it really such a new idea to buy an ASUS barebones PC, add memory, disk and cpu, throw an almost free OS at it, and free media software on it, and call it a product? Come on....

  30. MOD PARENT DOWN. by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do any of the moderators actually read the fucking article first?

    The CPU is a 2.4Ghz Celeron. It's not an expensive P4.

  31. is $MM a Britishism? International unit? by xtermin8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    $150 in M&Ms would not be so bad. If only my Ex-wife had only asked for that!

  32. Do not be alarmed. by PopeAlien · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we wouldnt want anything to be easy for the music 'consumer'. If only there were a simple solution to music piracy problems.

  33. Shhh! do you wanna get us all caught! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frighteningly effective way to violate the law! If you outlaw sharing music only outlaws will have music to share!

  34. WMLS11B support? by Phoenix823 · · Score: 1

    As many others here have stated, it looks like this machine is just running a modified version of the SlimServer software. I was shopping for wireless MP3 players last year and I got myself a Linksys WMLS11B. This MP3beamer says that certain media receivers can play the content stored on it, and it shows a picture of the WMLS11B.

    My question is, how are they doing that? The server component I need to use currently is MusicMatch, which sucks. I need to run Windows on a seperate computer for it and it's very unreliable. I'd like to switch to a Linux based server but I'm not going to shell out $400 when I've got 100's of gigs of music already. How can I get SlimServer (or any other software) to broadcast to my media player?

    1. Re:WMLS11B support? by Whizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      WMLS11B is a standard UPnP client. The TwonkyVision Media Server works just great to serve MP3s to my WMLS11B from linux.

    2. Re:WMLS11B support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPNP : you can use the Twonkyvison media server with any of these devices.

      http://www.twonkyvision.de/

    3. Re:WMLS11B support? by Phoenix823 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, thanks a lot. I'll give that a shot.

  35. Here are the torrent MPG links :) by TorrentNinja · · Score: 2, Informative
    Watch videos describing MP3beamer - click on the links below to view clips.

    MP3tunes purchase and loading MP3s to MP3beamer - 10:18 mins
    Mpeg Low-Res - 43.5MB
    Mpeg High-Res - 60 MB

    iTunes streaming, Home Stereo use - 10:39 mins
    Mpeg Low-Res - 40MB
    Mpeg High-Res - 55MB

    iTunes syncing, iPod loading, PDA playback - 11:30 mins
    Mpeg Low-Res- 39MB
    Mpeg High-Res - 49MB

  36. Too late... by di0s · · Score: 1

    Apple already beat them to the punch. Wait, wrong Beamer...

  37. Umm. . . I don't get it? by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    What exactly does this do that I can't do with my Mac already? I've already ripped my CDs and keep my whole music collection in my iTunes library. It already syncs with my iPod. I can stream music to my main stereo system, over the Airport network to my Roku Soundbridge. And. . . I don't have a PDA. So what's the point of buying a whole new $400 box to do all this stuff?

    Am I missing something?

  38. Does nobody value real estate anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of those screenshots seriously look as if they're running in 640x480. The taskbar, the icons... all way too big. In some of the screenshots with konqueror running, the taskbar and the browser toolbars take up damn near half the screen. It's this kind of impedence that forces me to adjust so many default settings I feel like I'm running windows again.

  39. MP3beamer was already released last summer by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1
    1. Re:MP3beamer was already released last summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are wrong.

      That's an mp3 bimmer.

  40. Case? by zoloto · · Score: 1

    This might be offtopic but its' in honest question regarding the device...

    What is the case the system is in? I find it very attractive and small. Can anyone help me out with a link or a name?

    1. Re:Case? by lar3ry · · Score: 1

      Already answered: Asus Pundit

      --
      "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
  41. Re:Umm. . . I don't get it? by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something?

    Dude, it's Linux... Don't you get it?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  42. where are the clients? by Rutulian · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is great. We now have at least three appliance-like devices that can take ripped cds and make them available over a network (comments about how the mac mini already does this aside). But where are the clients? This is the missing link. Sure, you can buy some crappy mp3 players that will let you browse a gigantic list of mp3s on a tiny lcd display, and won't support multiple formats or playlists or have high quality audio outputs for your stereo system...c'mon, we need a good client.

    What I want:
    1) A miniature box with networking capabilities that can take multiple input formats, and generate high quality audio output (something I can put in every room where I have an amp and a set of speakers). By high quality audio output, I mean support for 5.1 or 7.1 surround in addition to just plain stereo. Doesn't need to be powered, I can plug in my own amps.
    2) Ability to configure and play music from the display. So, if I'm sitting in the room and want to listen to some Bach, I can just walk over, press a few buttons, and adjust the volume.
    3) Ability to push music/playlists to the client from a networked computer or the server. So if I am sitting in the computer room, and I want Ben Folds playing in the kitchen and Beastie Boys playing in the living room, I can just click a few buttons and have it happen.

    Seriously, the server is there and has been there for a while. Now we need some quality clients to get your house really wired up. And yes, I'm aware I can set up a computer in every room, and fiddle with software settings and audio outputs...maybe write some custom software. The idea is to make this an appliance. Out of the box, easy to setup and just use.

    1. Re:where are the clients? by beetle99 · · Score: 1

      I don't work for Slim Devices, but...

      You can check off your list with the Squeezebox by Slim Devices (http://www.slimdevices.com/index.html), although it only has two "native" input formats - MP3 and WAV. The SlimServer software (free and multi-platform) can be set up to convert various other formats (AAC, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, etc.) on the fly to stream to one or more Squeezeboxes, either individually or in synch. Getting back on topic, the MP3Beamer also supports streaming to the Squeezebox client. From my reading of the MP3Beamer FAQ, however, it only works with the MP3 format, "...since that is the universally supported format..."

    2. Re:where are the clients? by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Easy answer: check out Slim Devices Squeezebox. Here's how it addresses your needs:

      1. The box is barely wider or taller than the display, and it's not very deep, either.

      2. The output is analog or digital stereo, not 5.1 or 7.1, but it doesn't funnel video anyway so there's no need for surround sound support (unless there's 5.1 and 7.1 non-movie audio out there?)

      3. You can use the remote and the surprisingly large and bright screen to configure your player, search through your music, build playlists, adjust the volume, change the screensaver, pull up internet radio streams, play pacman and tetris...okay, those last two might be gratuitous.

      4. You can use any computer on your network to change the playlist on and control all aspects of every player you have. Not only can you start Ben Folds and Beastie Boys playing on two different players from a computer in another room (or over the internet), you can also sync them so that they both play the same music AT THE SAME TIME in both rooms.

      I highly recommend the wired version, because it's cheap, in stock, and reliable as hell.

    3. Re:where are the clients? by toy4two · · Score: 1

      D-Link makes one that supports multiple formats and has high end output for stereos (optical) and high end output for televisions (component) http://support.dlink.com/products/view.asp?product id=DSM-320 Not by any means portable though.

    4. Re:where are the clients? by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      Wow, very nice! Thanks for the info.

  43. Re:CPU choice? - RIP speed by chill · · Score: 1

    Ripping chews cycles. The speed is mostly so it doesn't take 20 minutes to import a new CD.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  44. Awesome.. by Klowner · · Score: 1

    But, does he own the schematics or did he find them somewhere and assume they were free?

  45. But does it sync better than slimp3 on generic hw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using multiple computers, listening to the same stream, wifi?

  46. Too expensive, but I have a cool idea by telemonster · · Score: 1

    Too expensive... but a cool idea would be to hack the software so it shares your collection with all of your friends. Perhaps only let it serve 2 tracks at any given time, then make a network of these so you can play music from anyone connected to the network. You wouldn't store the stuff locally, of course, but the collective would have a huge library of music.

    I was looking at those setup tv devices that let you play stored mpeg1/2/4 content from a server. Neat but they rely on a host computer to do processing, which isn't a glamerous as a housewide media network of setop boxes accessing a fileserver.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  47. MP3beamer does have very unique features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be much more then just the slimserver code and far more functional then a Mac-Mini. Here are some of the unique features:

    - Ability to connect to any UPnP media device. Sorry, but Apple's airport express is garbage. Who wants to go to computer to change a song and then run back to your living room to hear it? That's lame. There are much better media receivers out there like the 2 listed on the MP3beamer web site from SMC and Linksys. Both have a remote control, a remote display and Linksys unit even has powered speakers. There's no other music server that supports UPnP devices.

    - Web, Java, AND iTunes interface
    Check out those screen shots. This device connects to EVERYTHING imaginable. Remote access via web or slick Java feature PLUS inline iTunes interface. You might find software that does one of those, but not all of them.

    - MP3beamer Sync
    This seems to be the best part of the whole package. A program where you can copy ALL the songs from MP3beamer to a remote machine with a click of a button. That ROCKS! (pun intended) Streaming is fine if you have a fat pipe, but often I don't my wifi clogged up with 128K MP3 streams. And if you're on a laptop you want to take the music with you since you're not always going to have a net connection. You can sync with your music collection and have local copies on ALL your computers. Nice. Then I can load up my iPod by simply plugging it into the synced machine running iTunes.

    About the only missing solution is the car. Where can I get a device which will sync over wifi when I pull the car into the driveway? If MP3beamer had a solution for that, then it would be the ULTIMATE. Anyone know of such a device? But as it is, it's impressive.

    I will buy the software though because I want to put it on a machine with bigger then 80gb disk.

  48. Death knell for DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh... anyone else see the impact of such a device? This is a death knell for DRM because it lets you copy your music to any device as well as just stream it. This blows up attempts to lock consumers into DRM schemes.

    If people haven't figured it out, the media companies and tech companies (Apple and MS) are trying to cram DRM down everyone's throat. This device lets music move freely among devices shattering the Apple-centric (AAC devices) or the MS-centric (Plays For sure) strategy.

    I think Robertson who put MP3 on the map with MP3.com is back with another invention which will rock the music industry to its core.

  49. "an avalanche of lawsuits" by serutan · · Score: 1

    Incredibly funny phrase. Maybe I'm just in a mood. Haven't RTA yet but the post made my day. Good jorb.

  50. What are we doing? by scottennis · · Score: 1

    All the money that goes into technology research and the best we can do is yet another toy for listening to music?

    All the money that goes into drug research and the best we can do is yet another ED pill or something to stop heartburn or keep your nose from running.

    Sometimes consumerism gets me so depressed that I go out on a shopping binge.

    1. Re:What are we doing? by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but when you try to do something really hard, you need a lot of money and a lot of talent. Projects like that throw off a lot of extra useful knowledge, and people who don't have the talent or money to tackle the big thing can look for a lesser problem and solve it with the spillover knowledge.

      Besides, even the smallest things are worth doing better. Read "The Evolution of Useful Things" to see just how much time and effort have gone into the creation of the Gem paper clip (the one you picture in your head when you think "paper clip").

  51. Are there any Windows Apps that can do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to do this, mostly for the accessing all my music online factor, but I dont want to install Linux just to do it. Is there anything that can do it, with a nice interface like this, on Windows XP?

    Otherwise I have to resort to using FTP... so 1998.

  52. reminds me of "Da Bomb" by afritz · · Score: 1

    I used to work for MP3.com back in the day, and this sounds a lot like "Da Bomb", the internal code name for the mechanism we had set up for mass ripping of CDs. Granted, this is a single linux box, and we had a cluster of a few hundred devoted to this purpose, but the concept is the same. We hired hourlies to insert new CDs into trays as they popped out, and the ripped data got automatically indexed and shipped off to its appropriate place in the disk farm. This isn't the first time MR has been interested in appliances. MP3.com sold music appliances to businesses to replace Muzak installations. The boxes needed to be plugged into a phone line, and would download playlists and new MP3s as needed. The store would log into a web interface at MP3.com and set up play lists and schedules. All it was was a cheap PC with a customized Linux distro and mpg123 playing files using cron. A *very* cool setup with a much lower monthly fee than Muzak. At one time all Rubio's restaurants had them.

    1. Re:reminds me of "Da Bomb" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mp3.com sold that technology to a company still in business called Trusonic. It is great technology.

      Robertson doesn't get his due as good tech mind. Well, maybe it wasn't all his idea, but MP3.com had good tech minds.

  53. As a bimmer owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a bit amusing to see people who can't afford a bimmer talk about them like they can. First clue...calling it a "beemer".

  54. Re:As a bimmer owner by exley · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and us BMW drivers may be snobs about the whole thing, but... We're BMW drivers.

  55. You're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mac Mini is a computer. This is an appliance.

    1. Re:You're missing the point by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini is a computer. This is an appliance.

      Is it still a computer if you use it like it's an appliance?

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  56. another application by hankaholic · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking lately about a similar device for an in-car player/media station which would combine an in-dash slot-loading drive (Pioneer makes them, such as the DVD-106s or similar) with a small PC with a local hard drive and 802.11.

    You could pop a new CD into the drive on the way home/to work/wherever, and the system would recognize it as a new device, automatically ripping it. With multi-session, it shouldn't be a problem to rip while playing. When you return home (or anywhere with an 802.11 connection) the system would automatically pull down CDDB data, and assuming your access point's range included your garage the ripped album could be sent automatically to a process running on a local machine.

    I hadn't thought about using iPods, et. al to push the music to, but it's a neat application. Problems to be solved include needing a simple daemon to notify of media change (think famd for removable media). There's an ioctl for it, and I have a clip of reference code for those interested, but I haven't determined whether polling for change will force a drive close (or with a slot-loading drive, simply pulling the disc back in) any time the software polls for change.

    Aside from that, a process to control ripping and encoding gracefully in the event of system shutdown or the user removing the disc would be needed. Also on the wish list would be a process which would wait for an available Internet connection to poll CDDB data when possible. Bonus points would be given if the process would realize when you're on a home LAN and push the music to your "main" PC.

    --
    Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
  57. Re:But does it sync better than slimp3 on generic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're confusing STREAMING with SYNCING.

    Yes it streams to any PC, iTunes, web or Java device. What's very unique is SYNCING. This causes copies of all music on server to be put on local machine for convenient playback. This is a very unique feature I've never seen anywhere else and makes it infinitely more useful then stream only solutions which assume you always have a fat pipe t your finger tips.

  58. BeamIT by kylv · · Score: 1

    BeamIT was such a great idea, I was really upset when the legal types killed it, which didn't take too long, and I've been searching ever since for a solution that is as good.

    All you had to do was put in a CD which you legally purchased, mp3.com would make a note that you owned this CD, then would let you download any songs off that CD on any other computer from anywhere in the world. I had all my music, at my fingertips from anywhere, for free, without having to manage my own server.

    If anyone, knows a solution anything like this in the world today, please let me know.

    1. Re:BeamIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i Think that's the point of this appliance. Copyright laws make the original my.mp3 undoable so MP3beamer is a local version.

      For the record, my.mp3 would only let you stream songs from CDs that you own not download them. The labels were idiots for suing them because that technology encouraged people to buy more CDs. Instead they wait 4 years and then go to selling every song for a dollar and being puzzled why their revenues are dropping. How do these people keep their jobs?

  59. European for "million" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea is that M = 1000 in Roman Numerals, so MM = 1000 * 1000, despite the fact that it would really be 2000 in Roman Numerals.

    They also use "M" for 1000 instead of the more commonplace "K". Yeah, don't ask me why, I think they do it just to be difficult.

  60. Re:As a bimmer owner by turtled · · Score: 1

    Apparently, the above replies don't get the humor in the joke. Maybe it's because they drive, Bimmers? Beemers? BMWs. Whatever.

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  61. emulators... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    lots of emulators for Mac.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  62. Doesn't a Mac Mini do this? by podperson · · Score: 1

    The first time you insert an audio CD you'll be asked if you want your Mac mini to launch iTunes. You can set iTunes to automatically rip and eject CDs (and pick the format).

    I imagine you can probably get a cheap PC to do the same trick using WMP (although you'll have to fight the defaults harder to avoid locked up file formats).

    Oh, but a Mac mini is *slightly* more expensive than this $400 one-trick-pony.

    1. Re:Doesn't a Mac Mini do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you read anything on MP3beamer website? Or did you just hit the reply button as fast as your 1.2 watt brain could move?

      If you would have taken the time to read the website you'd see that it does Java, it does web, it even Syncs - NONE OF WHICH iTunes does. It also interfaces with a whole host of UPnP devices for wireless access to home stereos and unlike the piece of crap airport express you actually can remotely control the music.

      And it's not a $400 one trick pony you idiot. It's actually a full fledged Linspire PC.

    2. Re:Doesn't a Mac Mini do this? by davebytes · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can now remote-control Airport Express. I think Griffin has a remote out... But I agree with the general statement. It's not a one-trick-pony. It's a full Linspire box, with (supposed) DVI and video outs to make it an instant media-player unit (thanks to the open-source linux media player initiatives). But yes, it's not a teeny tiny silent box either... -d

      --
      --- David Chait, Editor [CHAITGEAR]
  63. Why so much? by jbrandv · · Score: 1

    Download SlimServer and do most of that for free.

  64. Asus Pundit by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or dose the 'beamer' box look exactly like an ASUS pundit case?

    Asus Pundit

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  65. Jeez, I wrote about this LAST THURSDAY... by davebytes · · Score: 1

    and it was rejected then -- not sure why.

    If anyone cares of another quick read, feel free to check out my original coverage of the MP3beamer announcement. It's not much, just my read on the unit.

    BTW, I figured it being a linux box, and the iTunes/iPod connectivity, it'd be sure to get picked up immediately! Again, not sure why my original submission would have been rejected (would love to know!), but then I'm still new to this /. thing... ;)

    -d

    --
    --- David Chait, Editor [CHAITGEAR]
  66. Ever see this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.revogear.com/downloads/kuroboxspecs.pdf

    Basically a Buffalo Linkstation.

  67. BFD, it's just a very ordinary, overpriced PC. by Bubba+Bui · · Score: 1

    Sure, it sounds like a wonderful idea until you realize that it's a very ordinary celeron box with fairly ordinary software you can replicate with readily available open source software. This box is going to be expensive to keep running 24/7, too. As already mentioned a microITX box would be cheaper, at the cost of reduced performance. I'd go for a Mac mini myself. It's $100 more than Robertson's solution, but it's tiny and quiet, and you'll probably make up the price difference in a year with your utility bill. I went a much cheaper route: I bought a Linksys NSLU2 ($80), attached a 250GB USB drive ($130), hacked it using the instructions at http://www.nslu2-linux.org/, installed Samba 3 (for Unicode support) and NFS to share music files with my computers (mounting this network volume on a Mac or PC you can easily maintain the collection with iTunes), mt-daapd to serve the music to iTunes and the Roku SoundBridge, and recently jamvm to run the GlooLabs java server so the HomePod can see it too. Not bad for half the price Robertson wants for his lame device. FWIW, the SoundBridge is absolutely wonderful. Don't buy a competing device until you've had a chance to play with one.

  68. Output to TV for mac mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you output the the TV?

    Not a troll. I'm considering getting one for this purpose.. never entered the mac world..

    Insights please?

    1. Re:Output to TV for mac mini? by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      Well even if it doesn't have a built in TV out (not sure if it does) You could always use a scan converter.

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    2. Re:Output to TV for mac mini? by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      There's an S-Video/composite video adapter available on apple's site. It outputs from dvi to svideo and composite.

    3. Re:Output to TV for mac mini? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Apple sells a $19 adapter that connects to the DVI jack and has composite (RCA) and S-Video out. Use S-Video if your TV supports it.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  69. free soln: replicate your files using kareware rep by majid_aldo · · Score: 1
    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  70. nlsu2 & HomePod by nolus2 · · Score: 1

    I also own a HomePod and I just bought a NLSU2. It runs mt-daapd to serve my music library to all workstations in the home. I plan to run the Gloo Java server on it. What JVM dis you install ? How did it go ? What are the performances when mt-daapd and the Gloo server over Java run at the same time ? Thanks a lot in advance for your response.